Legislative Council Hansard 1913

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Legislative Council Hansard 1913 Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Council TUESDAY, 11 NOVEMBER 1913 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 2628 Axjournment. [COUNCIL] Joint Committees. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL .. TcESDAY, 11 NoVEMBER, 1913. The PRESIDENT (Hon, Sir Arthur Morgan) took the chair at half-past 3 o'clock. PAPERS. The following papers, laid on the table, were ordered to be printed :- Rl•port of the L nder Secretary for Pub­ _lic \Yorks and Government Architcc' on his tour through Europe, Great Brit .tin, F nitnd States of America, ;,;nd Canada. Third Report of the Workers' Dwellings Board for tho year 1912-13. Report on tlw Government Central Sugar Mills. SCSPB~SIOK OF ST \NTll~G IU.'LB~ AND ORDERS. On the motion of HoN. _\. H. BARLO\Y it v-;a, rl•,olwd- .. That so mu. h of the Standing Rules and Orders be suspended, for tho rc­ maindc>r of the session, as would other­ \Yise preclude the passing of Bills. through all their stages in one day." St:~SPEKSIOK OF STANDING ORDER No. 76. On the motion o£ RoN. A. H. BARLOW, it was resoh-ed- " That so much of Standing Order ::'>!o. 76 be suspended as requires the plans, sections, and books of reference of proposed rail ways, received from the Le<sislative Assembly, to lie on tho table during the remainder of tbe sitting at which they are brought in, and during th' whole of the next ,,itting day, be­ fore being referred to a Select Com­ mittee." JOINT COl\HIITTEES. ('O"TINT'ATION DeRING R:P. ,L;:JS, On the> motion of Ilo'l. A. H. BARLOW, it was rosohed-- " 1. That, i11 the opinion of this Ccun­ cil, it is dc,,irable that tho rnntlem.on constituting, rospndivcly, tlw Joint Librarv Committee, thn Joint Rcfresh­ rnpnt-r'Ooms Committ('1>, and the Joint Buildine-o Committee should continuo, to control, during the recess, the scYorul matters committ c·d to 'heir charg·e as ;;uch connnittof's during the ~c"·sion~ "2. That the abo•,'c resolution he for­ wardl'cl to the Legis!ativB Assembly by mesFage inviting their concurrence therein. Pure Seeds Bill. [11 J\'OVEMBER.j Pu1·e Seeds Bill. 2629 CRIMINAL CODE AMENDME::"!T BILL. get about a 90 per cent. crop." He (Mr .. Stephens) understood that, if the Bill was \ME~D~IENT o~ MoTro~ FOR THIRD passed, thG storekeepers would say that they READING. kept corn and wheat for the farmers' fowls, The ATTOR::"!EY-GENERAL (Hon. T. but they would not keep seed whu:~t or seed O'Sullivan) moved the insertion, on line 27, corn, and they would be able to evade the page 2, of the heading "Amendments as to law in that manner, if the Government Criminal Appeals" bdoro subclause (4) of allowed the law to be evaded in that way. dause 2, which would become subclause (3). He agreed with the Minister that, if the Amr'ndmcnt agreed to. ftmcndment was agreed to, it would make the clause optional, and possibly the best thing· would be to drop the Bill altogether. THIRD READING. Hox E. J. STEVENS was not mor<" sur­ prised· at the amendment than he was at On the motion of the ATTORNEY­ the means of evading the Bill proposed by GEXER~\L, tho Bill was road a third time, the hon. gentleman who repi'esented the passed, and ordered to be returr,ed to the Government. On looking at the title of the Ass0mbly b_, mes,ago in thp usual form. B1ll, he sa\> that it was "A Pure Seeds Bill.·' If there was anything in the Bill at all, it was to provide that pure seeds only PURE SEEDS 13ILL. should he us8d in this country. 'The "amend· mont provided that bY an agreement, verbal COMMITTEE. or otherwise, inferior seeds could be sold. That was entirely against the spirit of the (Han. W. F. Taylor in thr chair.) Bill, and it would not be a Pure Seeds Bill Clauses 1 to 4, both inclnsiY<'! put and at all under an arrangement of that kind. passed. He should certainly vote against tho a;nend­ ment, but ic would be a good thing after On clause 5--" Invoice to be given b"· \"dl­ the amendment was defeated to dc'eat the dor; '' .:trranty '' -- clause altogethe1·. l-Ie had n1a.de inquiries Ho]';. \V. V. BRO\Y::"!: The clausP com­ nu_tside Parliament, and he had been unable pellred a seed merchant to give a "·arranh to find anyone who w:.ts in favour of the with regard to all seeds sold by him, and Bill. The farmers were against it, as they imposed conditions which it was quit" im­ said thoro wac, nothing in it, and the ·SBBd possible for him to comply with. \Vhon n1er{lhants were entirely against it, as it farmers camB into the city to buy seed, they would place them in an absolutely false had the opportunity cf inspecting the seed, position. They had to import their seed and they know then what they were gotiing, from other countriPs, and they had to buy .so that there· was really no occasion for snch it without any warranty or guarantee at e.ll, a dradtic waTrantt~ in that ca,Je. He could and yet, when they sold it, they were called quite understand that,. when people living in U[lOn to guarantee that it was pure seed. remote places in the country S<'llt down to a If the Bill was carried out in its entirety, seed merchant in the city for seed, they it vmuld mean that no seed would be im: should have some warrantv that the seed was ported, as no seedsman would run the risk. .suitable for their purposes, and then the \\'arranty should stand good, unlhs tho pur­ HoN. A. J. THYN"'"E: The object of the {)haser agrE'ed in writing not to require a Bill was to provide that farmers would not warranty. He, therefore, moved the omis­ havB seed palmed off on them which wa• sion, in linrs 38 and 39, of the words "not­ use1ess. and also that they should have seed withstanding any agreements to th·~ con­ which was not contaminated with seeds of trary," with the view of inserting the words weeds, which wonld be a very serious injury " unlee, otherwise agreed in writing bv th(• purcha'"Or." ·' to them. \Yith regard to testing the germi­ nating qualitv of seed, that was a very HoN. A. H. BARLOW: The effect of the simple matter. Any farmer, simply by put­ amendment would be to make the Bill purely ting a qu'lntity of see,! between a. couple of optional. Nobody would have to obey it shec.ts of blotting paper for three or four unless he felt inclined. Exception was taken days, would be able to tell what the gcrmi­ on the second reading that a farmer would nn.ting qualit:- of the seed was. Then,_ 'iS not be able to sJ!l a bag of seed wheat to to weeds in seeds. that was a more serwus his neighboar. There was nothing in the matter, and one that required a good deal Bill to prevent him doing so. of consideration. Se\eral weeds had been introduced in imported seeds, and it was Hon. \V. V. BROWN : He is a vendor. desirable that the hrmers should be pro­ HoN. A. H. BARLOW, He as a vendor, tected, but the cheJk should not be on the but he was not a seed merchant. .'1. farmer s·oedsman alono. It should bu as tight, if <Jould give a bag of seed wheat to his neigh­ not more tight, on tho farmer than on the bour, and he could ~ay to him, " You can seedsman, because the whole of this s:vstem eat it, you can burn it, or do what•wer you was to be initiated for the benefit of the like with it." The Secretary for Agriculture farmer, and, if a farmer had a crop growing was of the opinion that, if the amendment in a fod condition, it would be almost a was passed, it would destror the whole cri,uinal act on his part to sell the seed effect of the Bill. " from that crop un]e,s he took precautions to ck-an it of weeds or other foul elements HoN. W. STEPHE="JS: On one occasion from which hB suffered. On the other hand, he went to bu3 some seed from a seed mm­ there \':as a g·ood dcctl to be ,aid on b<>half chant for planting, and the merchant said of tho scedsman. It was possible for them to him, "I don't sell seed for pl-anting, but to eupecvisc and check see.ds grown in I have some excellent bird seed, and a lot Queensland, but it was not an easy rna tter {)f my neighbours ar<> using it. and they for them to chPck ''ed import,- d from othm· Han . .A. J. Thynne.] 2630 Pure Serds Bill. [COUNCIL.] Pure Serds Bill. ·countries. He had tried some little experi­ RoN. A. J. THYNNE asked in what H;.ent: in grass seed.. He sent to {' very respect the Bill differed from the Yictorian [Hommc·nt seedsman m anothor country-a Act. man of very high standing-and he got a Ron. P. J. LE.\HY: It is more drastic than ~mall packet of seed •and sowed it, nursed thD Victorian Act. 1t, and looked after it c_arefully, aml he was ven. much _mterested m the shape of its HoK.
Recommended publications
  • FY 2022 Aid and Incentives for Towns (Sorted by County)
    Aid and Incentives for Municipalities (AIM) and AIM-Related Revenue Sharing FY 2022 Enacted Budget Towns Sorted by County FY 2021 Enacted Budget FY 2022 Enacted Budget AIM & AIM-Related AIM & AIM-Related Municipality County Class Revenue Sharing* Revenue Sharing Town of Berne Albany Town 12,028 12,028 Town of Bethlehem Albany Town 126,638 126,638 Town of Coeymans Albany Town 27,793 27,793 Town of Colonie Albany Town 456,567 456,567 Town of Green Island Albany Town 26,528 26,528 Town of Guilderland Albany Town 135,398 135,398 Town of Knox Albany Town 15,968 15,968 Town of New Scotland Albany Town 37,704 37,704 Town of Rensselaerville Albany Town 8,632 8,632 Town of Westerlo Albany Town 13,403 13,403 Town of Alfred Allegany Town 44,303 44,303 Town of Allen Allegany Town 2,454 2,454 Town of Alma Allegany Town 5,440 5,440 Town of Almond Allegany Town 10,907 10,907 Town of Amity Allegany Town 10,042 10,042 Town of Andover Allegany Town 9,776 9,776 Town of Angelica Allegany Town 5,063 5,063 Town of Belfast Allegany Town 8,897 8,897 Town of Birdsall Allegany Town 1,866 1,866 Town of Bolivar Allegany Town 16,848 16,848 Town of Burns Allegany Town 5,874 5,874 Town of Caneadea Allegany Town 14,814 14,814 Town of Centerville Allegany Town 4,131 4,131 Town of Clarksville Allegany Town 8,876 8,876 Town of Cuba Allegany Town 14,326 14,326 Town of Friendship Allegany Town 14,133 14,133 Town of Genesee Allegany Town 14,050 14,050 Town of Granger Allegany Town 3,093 3,093 Town of Grove Allegany Town 3,176 3,176 Town of Hume Allegany Town 12,728 12,728
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works Commissioners & Highway Superintendents
    City Commissioners of Public Works and Highway Superintendents Name Title County Address City State Zip County Phone Fax e-Mail Willard Bruce City Commissioner of Public Works City of Albany One Conners Blvd Albany NY 12204 Albany 518-427-7480 518-427-7499 [email protected] Raymond Halgas City Public Works Supervisor City of Amsterdam 61 Church St Amsterdam NY 12010 Montgomery 518-841-4339 518-843-3614 William Lupien Jr City Superintendent of Engineering Services City of Auburn 24 South St Auburn NY 13021 Cayuga 315-253-8354 315-252-7688 B. Leonard Walker City Director of Public Works City of Batavia One Batavia City Centre Batavia NY 14020 Genesee 585-345-6325 585-343-9221 [email protected] Anthony Thomaselli City Highway Superintendent City of Beacon One Municipal Plaza Suite One Beacon NY 12508 Dutchess 845-831-0932 845-831-0932 Luke Day City Commissioner of Public Works City of Binghamton 38 Hawley St Binghamton NY 13901 Broome 607-772-7021 607-772-7023 Joseph Giambra City Commissioner of Public Works City of Buffalo 502 City Hall Buffalo NY 14202 Erie 716-851-5636 Louis Loy City Director of Public Works City of Canandaigua 205 Saltonstall St Canandaigua NY 14424 Ontario 585-396-5060 585-396-5002 [email protected] Ken Radliff City Commissioner of Public Works City of Cohoes 97 Mohawk St Cohoes NY 12047 Albany 518-233-2140 518-237-0072 Michael Harris City Commissioner of Public Works City of Corning 1 Nasser Civic Center Plaza Corning NY 14830 Steuben 607-962-0340 607-937-3358 Christopher Bistocchi City Commissioner
    [Show full text]
  • CHIPS and Local PAVE Runs
    County of Albany 2016-17 Base CHIPS PAVE-NY Share Total CHIPS SFY 2016-17 County Municipality Appor?onments Albany County of Albany $2,371,506 $541,320 $2,912,826 Albany City of Albany $1,553,107 $354,512 $1,907,619 Albany City of Cohoes $350,149 $79,925 $430,074 Albany City of Watervliet $197,788 $45,147 $242,935 Albany Town of Berne $183,511 $41,888 $225,399 Albany Town of Bethlehem $316,235 $72,184 $388,418 Albany Town of Coeymans $111,906 $25,544 $137,450 Albany Town of Colonie $563,009 $128,512 $691,521 Albany Town of Guilderland $284,300 $64,894 $349,194 Albany Town of Knox $81,463 $18,595 $100,058 Albany Town of New Scotland $184,090 $42,020 $226,110 Albany Town of Rensselaerville $181,446 $41,417 $222,863 Albany Town of Westerlo $120,753 $27,563 $148,316 Albany Village of Altamont $21,832 $4,983 $26,815 Albany Village of Colonie $148,767 $33,958 $182,724 Albany Village of Green Island $47,581 $10,861 $58,441 Albany Village of Menands $51,723 $11,806 $63,530 Albany Village of Ravena $50,939 $11,627 $62,566 Albany Village of Voorheesville $54,679 $12,481 $67,161 County of Allegany 2016-17 Base CHIPS PAVE-NY Share Total CHIPS SFY 2016-17 County Municipality Appor?onments Allegany County of Allegany $2,356,291 $537,847 $2,894,137 Allegany Town of Alfred $94,063 $21,471 $115,534 Allegany Town of Allen $118,285 $27,000 $145,285 Allegany Town of Alma $96,645 $22,060 $118,705 Allegany Town of Almond $141,401 $32,276 $173,677 Allegany Town of Amity $87,093 $19,880 $106,972 Allegany Town of Andover $124,155 $28,340 $152,495 Allegany Town
    [Show full text]
  • DESIGNED LANDSCAPES in QUEENSLAND, 1859-1939: Experimentation – Adaptation – Innovation
    DESIGNED LANDSCAPES in QUEENSLAND, 1859-1939: experimentation – adaptation – innovation. by Jean Constance Robertson SIM B.Des.St. (UQ), B.Arch. (UQ), Grad.Dip.Land.Arch. (QUT), MA-Conservation Studies (York), AAILA A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Queensland University of Technology November, 1999 [This electronic copy was compiled in November 2007] ABSTRACT The conservation of historic cultural landscapes in Queensland is in its infancy. Effective conservation practice, however is based on sound historical information, and no previous study has investigated the historical development of local parks, gardens and other landscapes. The objectives of this research were to examine the factors which influenced landscape design in Queensland, to identify the forms and expressions of design derived from these influences, and to identify any distinctive aspects related to local landscape character. The timeframe chosen for this investigation was from the beginning of the separate colony of Queensland (1859) to the outbreak of World War 2 (1939). Using historical method, the research began with an exploration of published primary sources (particularly garden literature from the 1860s to 1930s) related to Queensland and other 'tropical' areas. A series of hypotheses was proposed to explain the findings, and these were tested by further analysis and data gathering. There followed a triple-layered central proposition, suggesting that: (i) in Queensland, the traditional delineation of styles to
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council
    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Council WEDNESDAY, 1 NOVEMBER 1905 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 1378 Death of Hon. B. D. Morehead. [COUNCIL.] AdJournment. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL • .WEDNESDAY, 1 NOVEMBER, 1905. The PRESIDING CHAilniAN (Hon. A. Norton) ook the chair at half-past 3 o'clock. PAPER. The following paper, laid ot1 the table, was >rdered to be printed :-Repmt of the Engineer 'or Harbours and Rivers for the year ended 30th rune, 1905. P:B;TITIONS. METROPOLITAX HosPITAr.s Bn.L. HoN. :B'. H. HART pre,ented a petition from ;he council of the city of Brisbane setting forth ·easons why the Council should amend or reject ;his BilL Petition read and received. Petitions of" similar purport and prayer were presented by the HoN. A. J. THYNNE from the council of the city of Rout h Brisbane, the council of the shire of Oaboolture, and the cnuncil of the shire of Kedron; by the HoN. J, T. ANN EAR from the council of the town of \Vindsor and the council of the shire of Tin­ galpa; by the HoN. :F. T. BRE:t\TNALL from the C•lUncil of the shire of Balmoral, the council of the shire of Be!rnont, the council of the shire of Coorparoo, and the council of the shire of Stepbens ; by the HoN. G. \V. GRAY from the council nf the town of Hamilton, from the council of the shire of Toombul, and from the council of the town of Sandga.te; by the HoN. E. J. STEVJ:;JNS from the council of the shire of Beenleigh, the council of the shire of South­ port, and the council of the shire of N erar•g; by the HoN.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 6
    ATTACHMENT 6 Appendix B: PRODUCT / SERVICES SPECIFICATIONS It is the intention of Region 4 ESC to establish an annual contract with highly qualified Vendor(s) for Software and Related Products and Services on a national basis for education agencies and other public entities. Vendor(s) shall, at the request of Region 4 ESC and/or TCPN members, provide these covered products and associated services under the terms of this RFP and the contract terms and conditions. Software may be offered as out-of-the-box, Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) or Software-as-a-service (SAAS). Region 4 ESC is seeking a variety of software applications pertaining to public agencies’ needs, including but not limited to: Operating Systems and Utilities Office Productivity Software Creative Software Financial Management Software Language Learning Software Enterprise Content Management Software Mass Communications Software Workforce Management Software Research-Based Data Analysis Software Anti-virus and Computer Security Software Peripherals having to do with software offered for this RFP (such as headsets that may be paired with language learning software) may be offered as value add. All such peripherals must be auditably priced and follow the same guidelines listed in Appendix C as the main offering of software does. The following software offerings are excluded from this RFP and will not be accepted if they are offered: Oracle Software Safety Information Management System Software Curriculum Software Facility Security or Vehicle Security Software These are adequately handled by other contracts or pending solicitations. 26 of 154 Appendix E: QUESTIONNAIRE Please provide responses to the following questions that address your company’s operations, organization, structure and processes for providing products and services.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Cultural Heritage
    The University of Queensland Archaeological Services Unit Report No. 423b Cultural Heritage Report for the Proposed Northern Link Project Report to Sinclair Knight Merz Connell Wagner Joint Venture Jon Prangnell PhD, Karen Murphy BA(Hons), Tam Smith MA and Linda Terry BA(Hons) School of Social Science The University Of Queensland Brisbane Q 4072 September 2008 Executive Summary This report details the results of the cultural heritage investigations undertaken of the Northern Link Project area (henceforth known as the Study Area). The University of Queensland Archaeological Services Unit (UQASU) was contracted by the Sinclair Knight Merz Connell Wagner Joint Venture on behalf of Brisbane City Council to undertake a study of the existing cultural heritage values of the proposed Northern Link route. This report details the results of studies of both the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal cultural heritage places within the Study Area and the likely impacts and mitigation measures required. It is based on existing knowledge, registers and reports of the Study Area, community consultation, survey reports produced by the relevant Aboriginal Parties and surveys of standing structures conducted between October and December 2007. The Study Area consists of a corridor that traverses the inner western suburbs of Brisbane from Toowong in the west to Kelvin Grove in the east, taking in parts of the suburbs of Auchenflower, Bardon, Bowen Hills, Brisbane City (Petrie Terrace), Fortitude Valley, Herston, Kelvin Grove, Milton, Mount Coot-tha, Paddington, Red Hill, Spring Hill, Taringa and Toowong. For the purposes of the Cultural Heritage Study, a 300m buffer was applied around the Study Area to ensure that all places that may be affected by the proposed development were captured in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State & Local Retirement System Participating Employers
    New York State & Local Retirement System Participating Employers Employees’ Department of Law Interstate Environmental Comis Department of Motor Vehicles Joint Leg Audit Committee Retirement System Department of State Justice Center for Protection Department of Tax & Finance Kingsboro Child & Youth Serv State Agencies Department of Transportation Kingsboro Psych Ctr Adirondack Correction Facility Dept Labor - Manpower Kirby Forensic Psych Ctr Adirondack Park Agcy Dept of Agriculture & Markets Labor Management Committee Albion Corr Facility Dept of Correctional Services Lake George Park Commission Allegany St Pk and Rec Regn Dept of Economic Development Lakeview Shock Incarc Facility Altona Corr Facility Dept of Environmental Conservation Lansing Residential Center Appellate Div Dept of Financial Services Law Library, 7th Judicial Dist Assembly Ways & Means Committ Dept of Public Service Lawyers Client Protection Fund Attica Corr Facility Div Alc & Alc Abuse Trtmnt Ctr Leg Task Force Reapportionment Auburn Corr Facility Div Alcoholic Beverage Control Legislative Ethics Committee Authorities Budget Office Div Criminal Justice Serv Legislative Health Service Bare Hill Correction Facility Div Housing & Community Renewal Legislative Library Bedford Hills Corr Facility Div Military & Naval Affairs Legislative Messenger Service Bernard Fineson Dev Ctr Div of Tax Appeals Lincoln Corr Facility Bill Drafting Commission Division of Human Rights Livingston Correction Facility Binghamton Childrens Services Division of Parole Long Island Dev Ctr Bronx
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Annual Report Supplement
    NEW YORK STATE AND LOCAL RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 2002 ANNUAL REPORT SUPPLEMENT H. Carl McCall State Comptroller CONTENTS FINANCIAL SECTION ................. 1 ACTUARIAL SECTION .............. 65 Independent Auditors’ Report ....................... 1 Actuarial Funding and Valuation .................. 66 Statements of Plan Net Assets ........................ 2 Actuarial Valuation Balance Sheets .............. 68 Statements of Changes in Plan Net Assets ..... 3 Employer Final Contribution Rates ............. 70 Notes to Financial Statements ........................ 4 Employer Contributions .............................. 72 Schedule of Funding Progress ...................... 10 Changes In Contributions ............................ 74 Schedule of Employer Contributions .......... 11 Historical Trends .......................................... 75 Investment Results ....................................... 76 STATISTICAL SECTION ............. 12 Combined Systems Participants ................... 12 INVESTMENT SECTION ............ 76 Membership by Age and Years of Service..... 13 Domestic Stock Performance ....................... 77 Membership by Tier ..................................... 14 International Stock Performance ................. 78 Membership by Status .................................. 14 Global Equity Performance .......................... 78 Membership by Employer Type ................... 15 Domestic Bonds ........................................... 79 Average Salary by Employer Type ................. 15 Private Equity Investments Summary
    [Show full text]