DOCSLIB.ORG

Dark Matter Lecture 1: Evidence and Candidates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dark Matter Lecture 1: Evidence and Candidates Dark Matter Lecture 1: Evidence and candidates March 27, 2012 Dark matter lectures University of Sao Paulo Laura Baudis, Universität Zürich 1 Content: first lecture • Overview: cosmological parameters in the standard model of cosmology • Dark matter in galaxies and in the Milky Way structure of the Milky Way galactic rotation curve and what can we learn from it dark matter distribution simulations of the Milky Way’s dark halo - spatial distribution of dark matter - velocity distribution of dark matter - the dark matter disk • Candidates for dark matter, overview neutrinos WIMPs and freeze-out candidates from supersymmetry - allowed parameter space in a constrained SUSY model 2 Content: second lecture • Direct detection of WIMPs: principles expected rates in a terrestrial detector kinematics of elastic WIMP-nucleus scattering differential rates corrections I: movement of the Earth corrections II: form factors cross sections for scattering on nucleons - spin independent - spin dependent • Expected WIMP signal and backgrounds time and directional signal dependance quenching factors and background discrimination background sources in direct detection experiments detector strategies: overview 3 Content: third lecture • Overview of experimental techniques example: theoretical predictions and experimental limits vanilla exclusion plot WIMP mass and cross section determination complementarity between different targets and astrophysical uncertainties • Cryogenic experiments at mK temperatures Principles of phonon mediated detectors Detection of fast and thermalized phonons Temperature measurements: thermistors, SC transition sensors (SPT, TES) • Phonon and light detectors Example: CRESST • Phonon and charge detectors Examples: CDMS, EDELWEISS • Future detectors Challenges; examples: SuperCDMS, EURECA, GEODM 4 Content: fourth lecture • Liquid Noble Element Experiments Principles and properties of noble liquids Charge and light in noble liquids Calibration issues (electronic and nuclear recoils) • Single Phase Experiments Principles Examples: XMASS, DEAP/CLEAN • Double Phase Experiments Principles Examples: XENON, ZEPLIN, ArDM, WARP, LUX • Future detectors Challenges Examples: DARWIN, MAX, LZS • Overall summary and conclusions 5 Literature 1. “Particle Dark Matter”, editor Gianfranco Bertone; Cambridge University Press, December 2009 2. Cold thermal relics: “The Early Universe”, by Edward W. Kolb, Michael S. Turner, Addison Wesley, 1990 3. Introduction to supersymmetry: “Weak Scale Supersymmetry”, by Howard Baer, Xerxes Tata, Cambridge University Press, 2006 4. Direct and indirect detection: “Supersymmetric Dark Matter”, by G. Jungmann, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Physics Reports 267 (1996) 5. Principles of direct dark matter detection: “Review of mathematics, numerical factor and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoils”, by J.D. Lewin and P.F. Smith, Astroparticle Physics 6 (1996) 6. Reviews of direct detection experiments: “Direct Detection of Dark Matter” by R.J. Gaitskell, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54 (2004), L. Baudis, “Direct Detection of Cold Dark Matter” SUSY07 Proceedings 7. Low background techniques: “Low-radioactivity background techniques” by G. Heusser, Ann. Rev. Part. Sci. 45 (1995) 8. Particle Astrophysics: “Particle and Astroparticle Physics” by U. Sarkar. Taylor & Francis 2008; “Particle Astrophysics” by D. Perkins, Oxford University Press 2003 9. mK Cryogenic Detectors: “Low-Temperature Particle Detectors”, by N.E. Booth, B. Cabrera, E. Fiorini, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 46, 1996 10.Liquid xenon detectors: “Liquid xenon detectors for particle physics and astrophysics”, by E. Aprile and T. Doke, Reviews of Modern Physics, Volume 82, 2010 11. PDG: Particle Detectors for Non-Accelerator Physics (http://pdg.lbl.gov/2010/reviews/rpp2010-rev-particle-detectors- non-accel.pdf) 6 . !BB %INE VON DER 3EITE wEDGE ONi BETRACHTETE 'ALA XIEMIT7ARP"ILD2"OTTEMA 0 !BB3CHEIBENGALAXIENLASSEN SICH MITTELS EINES 4ILTED 2ING -ODELLSDARSTELLEN"ILD92E VAZ 'ENF Z Y X 0 !BB$IE&ORMEINES7ARPSËH fhe]hWcc[di_dZm_hWX[hc_jjb[hm[_b[ Z[h Wajk[bb[d Lehij[bbkd] m_hZ `[Z[ =W# NELTAUFDENERSTEN"LICKEINEM _d Z[h BW][" Z_[i[ 7dWboi[d c_j Z[h [h# bWn_[led[_d[ch_[i_][d>Wbe"[_d[hMeb# )NTEGRALZEICHEN LINKS 3CHAUT \ehZ[hb_Y^[d :[fhe`[aj_ed X[h Z_[ ][# a[Wki`[d[dec_di[d:kdab[#CWj[h_[# MANSICH'ALAXIENJEDOCHGENAU iWcj[ 7kiZ[^dkd] Z[h =WbWn_[ ZkhY^# J[_bY^[d" [_d][^bbj$ M[dd cWd [_d[d ER AN DANN BESITZEN DIE 7ARPS pk\^h[d$ :_[i ][iY^_[^j c_jj[bi [_d[h iebY^[d >Wbe d_Y^j Wbi ak][b\hc_] Wd# DER 'ASSCHEIBEN DIE &ORM EI CeZ[bbh[Y^dkd]" m[bY^[ Z_[ =WbWn_[ _d d_ccj" iedZ[hd c_j pm[_ eZ[h ]Wh Zh[_ NES)NTEGRALZEICHENSMIT3ERIFEN [_d[ ]he[ PW^b ][][d[_dWdZ[h ][d[_]# kdj[hiY^_[Zb_Y^bWd][d7Y^i[dWkiijWjj[j RECHTS j[h H_d][ Wk\j[_bj ½J_bj[Z#H_d]#CeZ[bb¼" ZW^[hZ[hDWc[½jh_Wn_Wb¼"ieZWii[hWX# 7XX$ -$ =b[_Y^p[_j_] [hc]b_Y^j Z_[i ][ÔWY^jkdZkdj[hKcijdZ[d][][dZ_[ [_d[ [_d][^[dZ[ Kdj[hikY^kd] Z[h ;_# ij[bbWh[IY^[_X[][d[_]j_ij"m_hZZWi=Wi ][diY^W\j[dledMWhfi$ _c?dd[dX[h[_Y^Z[h=WbWn_[Z[cIY^m[# :_[ <ehc Z_[i[h L[hmbXkd] ]b[_Y^j h[\[bZ Z[h Ij[hd[ <eb][ b[_ij[d" m^h[dZ pkdY^ijZ[hZ[icWj^[cWj_iY^[dIoc# Wk[dZWi=hWl_jWj_edi\[bZZ[i½iY^_[\[d¼ Xebi \h ZWi ?dj[]hWb 7XX$ .$ ;hijcWbi >WbeiZ_[A_d[cWj_akdZL[hj[_bkd]Z[i mkhZ[cWd;dZ[Z[h\d\p_][h@W^h[Wk\ =Wi[ikdj[hAedjhebb[^Wj7XX$/$:_[i[i L[hX_[]kd][d]WbWaj_iY^[hIY^[_X[dWk\# 8_bZ m_hZ ZkhY^ 8[eXWY^jkd][d kdj[h# c[haiWc"kdZpmWh_dkdi[h[c[_][d[d ijjpj0:_[MWhfii[jp[ddcb_Y^_cc[h C_bY^ijhW[dioij[c$ M[i[djb_Y^ X[ii[h ][dWkZehjWd"meZ_[ij[bbWh[dIY^[_X[d 0 !BB $IE INNERE STELLARE [ha[ddjcWdZWiF^dec[d"m[ddcWd [dZ[d$ 3CHEIBE IST GEGEN DEN TRIAXIA led Wk[d Wk\ =WbWn_[d iY^Wkj$ ;i mW# The Standard Model of Cosmology LEN (ALO GEKIPPT )M !UENBE h[die][dWddj[;Z][#Ed#=WbWn_[dieb# REICHDER'ALAXIEISTDIE3CHEIBE Y^[" Z_[ cWd h[Y^j ][dWk led Z[h I[_j[ WENIGER DICHT UND MASSEËRMER i_[^j" _d Z[h[d 7k[dX[h[_Y^[d H[dpe Galaxies Clusters (lensing) Large scale structures SIEGEHORCHTDAHERDEM'RAVITA IWdY_i_'/-,iebY^[MWhfi[haWddj["kdZ TIONSPOTENTIAL DES $UNKLEN (A pmWh_dl_[hled\d\kdj[hikY^j[d<b# LOS b[d${X[hZ_[KhiWY^[Z_[i[iF^dec[di ^WX[di_Y^Z_[7ijhedec[di[_j^[hl_[b[ =[ZWda[d][cWY^j"[_d[[_dZ[kj_][B# ikd]Z[iFheXb[ci_ijWX[hdeY^d_Y^j_d I_Y^j$;_d[C]b_Y^a[_j_ijZ_[Z[h=[p[_# j[dm_hakd]ledX[dWY^XWhj[d=WbWn_[d$ @[ZeY^ÓdZ[jcWdWkY^_d_ieb_[hj[d=W# bWn_[dabWhWki][X_bZ[j[MWhfi$ ;_d[ WdZ[h[ c]b_Y^[ ;habhkd] \h Z_[i[iF^dec[db_[\[hdie][dWddj[jh_# A B C D Wn_Wb[ >Wbei :kdab[h CWj[h_[$ =[c Atoms (visible Matter) 34%2.%5.$7%,42!5- 3EPTEMBER 5% Dark Matter 22% Dark Energy 73% Clusters (lensing) Cosmic Microwave BG 7 Overview: WMAP results • WMAP data reveals that its contents include 4.6% atoms, the building blocks of stars and planets. • Dark matter comprises 23% of the universe. This matter, different from atoms, does not emit or absorb light. It has only been detected indirectly by its gravity. • 72% of the universe, is composed of "dark energy", that acts as a sort of an anti-gravity. This energy, distinct from dark matter, is responsible for the present-day acceleration of the universal expansion. Credit: NASA / WMAP Science Team 8 The Standard Model of Cosmology • Cosmological Parameters (WMAP7) ➡ Total matter and energy density: Ωtot = 1.02 ± 0.02 ➡ Total matter density: Ωm = 0.266 ± 0.029 ➡ Density of baryons: Ωb = 0.0449 ± 0.0028 ➡ Energy density of the vacuum: ΩΛ = 0.743 ± 0.029 ➡ Hubble constant: H0 = (71.0 ± 2.5) km/s/Mpc ➡ Age of the Universe: τU = (13.75 ± 0.13) Gy http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/current/parameters.cfm 2 expansion rate 3H0 −27 −3 ρ ρc ≡ = 9.47 × 10 kg m a& Ω ≡ x 8πG H(t) ≡ x a ρc 3 ⇢ 6H atoms m− c ' − a(t) = scale factor, describes the expansion of the Universe density parameter critical density 9 Dark Matter in the Milky Way and in galaxies 10 The MilkyASTRO II, S SWay06 as9.1 Inater sgalaxytellarer Staub 93 Die Milchstraße im optischen Spektralbereich • Complex system made of stars, dust, gas and dark matter Sternlicht, starke Absorption durch Dunkelwolken (Staub) 11 93 The Milky Way as a galaxy, initial remarks • Its study has proven to be quite challenging, as we live at the edge of a disk of stars, dust and gas that severely impacts our ability to “see” beyond our stellar neighborhood when we look along the plane of the disk, and the problem is most severe when we look towards the Galactic Center (GC) • Much of what is known today about the formation and evolution of our galaxy is encoded in the motion of its constituents • Measuring this motion is complicated, because it occurs from an “observing platform” that is itself undergoing a complex motion that involves the motion of the Earth around the Sun and the Sun’s path around the Galaxy • As we shall see, the detailed study of these motions lead to the conclusion that the luminous, baryonic matter in the Galaxy is only a small fraction of what the Milky Way is composed of COBE near IR view 12 Structure of the Milky Way • The Milky Way consists of: galactic thin disk (scale height* zthin ≈ 350 pc), composed of relatively young stars and region of current star formation galactic thick disk (zthick ≈ 1000 pc), composed of an older population of stars; the stars per unit volume is only about 8.5% of the one in the think disk galactic bulge visible (stellar) halo dark halo dark disk (new!) • The diameter of the disk (including dust, • The distance Sun - Galactic Center (GC) stars and gas) is: D ≈ 50 kpc R0 = 8.5 kpc (official value, IAU 1985) new value R0 = 8.0±0.5 kpc * one scale height (z) = the distance over which the number density decreases by e-1 13 Mass-to-light ratio • Based on data from star counts and orbital motions, the estimated stellar mass of the thin disk is roughly: 6 1010M ⇠ ⇥ • To this, we must add the contribution from dust and gas: 0.5 1010M ⇠ ⇥ • The luminosity of stars in the think disk in the blue-wavelength band is: 10 LB 1.8 10 L ' ⇥ • From this, we obtain a mass-to-light ratio of: M M 3 LB L ' • For the thick disk, the blue-band luminosity is ~ 1% of the one of the thin disk, with the mass around 3% of the thin-disk mass (it has been much more difficult to detect; diagnostic importance for the dynamics of the disk); the bulge is very similar to the thin disk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dark Matter Sensitivity of Multi-Ton Liquid Xenon Detectors
    Prepared for submission to JCAP Dark matter sensitivity of multi-ton liquid xenon detectors Marc Schumann,a;1 Laura Baudis,b Lukas Bütikofer,a Alexander Kish,b Marco Selvic aAlbert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Universität Bern, Switzerland bPhysik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Switzerland cINFN Bologna, Italy E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. We study the sensitivity of multi ton-scale time projection chambers using a liquid xenon target, e.g., the proposed DARWIN instrument, to spin-independent and spin- dependent WIMP-nucleon scattering interactions. Taking into account realistic backgrounds from the detector itself as well as from neutrinos, we examine the impact of exposure, energy threshold, background rejection efficiency and energy resolution on the dark matter sensitivity. With an exposure of 200 t × y and assuming detector parameters which have been already demonstrated experimentally, spin-independent cross sections as low as 2:5×10−49 cm2 can be probed for WIMP masses around 40 GeV/c2. Additional improvements in terms of background rejection and exposure will further increase the sensitivity, while the ultimate WIMP science reach will be limited by neutrinos scattering coherently off the xenon nuclei. arXiv:1506.08309v2 [physics.ins-det] 3 Sep 2015 1Corresponding author. Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Light and Charge Signal Generation2 3 Energy Scale and Energy Resolution3 4 Evaluation of the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon Sensitivity4 5 Backgrounds6 6 Electronic Recoil Rejection 10 7 WIMP Sensitivity 12 8 Summary and Discussion 15 1 Introduction The nature of dark matter, contributing about 27% to the matter and energy content of our Universe [1], is one of the outstanding open questions in physics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Debate Page 6 in This Issue: CLAS Welcomes New Faculty
    November 2004 Volume 18 notes CLASThe University of Florida College of Liberal Arts and Sciences The Great Debate page 6 In this Issue: CLAS Welcomes New Faculty ........... 3 The Great Debate ............................. 6 Around the College ......................... 8 Grants .............................................. 10 Bookbeat ........................................ 11 The Dean’s Junk Mail Be Gone! ....................... 12 Musings The Fundamentals As important as our cross-disciplinary interactions are, E-mail [email protected] with your news and especially in the applied sciences and social sciences, events information for publication in CLAS- we need to remind ourselves of the critical importance notes. The deadline for submissions is the 15th of the month prior to the month you would of the fundamental academic disciplines—the essential like your information published. Don’t wait! units of mathematics, English, philosophy, history, the Send us your news and events today! languages, natural sciences, behavioral sciences and social studies. It is these core units that engage in the basic research that historically has led to some of the most far-reaching discoveries and the formation of new interdisciplinary programs. Inventions which have led to revolutionary technologies and analyses that College of Liberal Arts and Sciences News and Publications have changed our understanding of societies and their 2008 Turlington Hall behaviors have often had their as their origin the PO Box 117300 Gainesville FL 32611-7300 research of a challenging academic problem. [email protected] Our college has the responsibility of advancing http://clasnews.clas.ufl.edu these basic areas of inquiry by energizing fundamental CLASnotes is published by the College of Liberal research with support for promising interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences to inform faculty, staff and stu- programs.
    [Show full text]
  • DARWIN: Dark Matter WIMP Search with Noble Liquids
    DARWIN: dark matter WIMP search with noble liquids Laura Baudis∗† Physik Institut, University of Zurich E-mail: [email protected] DARWIN (DARk matter WImp search with Noble liquids) is an R&D and design study towards the realization of a multi-ton scale dark matter search facility in Europe, based on the liquid argon and liquid xenon time projection chamber techniques. Approved by ASPERA in late 2009, DAR- WIN brings together several European and US groups working on the existing ArDM, XENON and WARP experiments with the goal of providing a technical design report for the facility by early 2013. DARWIN will be designed to probe the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross sec- tion region below 10−47cm2 and to provide a high-statistics measurement of WIMP interactions in case of a positive detection in the intervening years. After a brief introduction, the DARWIN goals, components, as well as its expected physics reach will be presented. arXiv:1012.4764v1 [astro-ph.IM] 21 Dec 2010 Identification of Dark Matter 2010-IDM2010 July 26-30, 2010 Montpellier France ∗Speaker. †DARWIN Project Coordinator; on behalf of the DARWIN consortium. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ DARWIN: dark matter WIMP search with noble liquids Laura Baudis 1. Introduction One of the most exciting topics in physics today is the nature of Dark Matter in the Universe. Although indirect evidence for cold dark matter is well established, its true nature is not yet known. The most promising explanation is Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), for they would naturally lead to the observed abundance and they arise in many of the potential extensions of the Standard Model of particle physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Physics with Multi-Ton Scale Liquid Xenon Detectors
    Prepared for submission to JCAP Neutrino physics with multi-ton scale liquid xenon detectors L. Baudis,a;1 A. Ferella,a;b A. Kish,a A. Manalaysay,a;e T. Marrodán Undagoitiaa;c and M. Schumanna;d aPhysik Institut, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland bLaboratorio Nazionale del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi, Italy cMax-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany dAlbert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Universität Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland eDepartment of Physics, University of California Davis, 95616 Davis, CA, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. We study the sensitivity of large-scale xenon detectors to low-energy solar neu- trinos, to coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering and to neutrinoless double beta decay. As a concrete example, we consider the xenon part of the proposed DARWIN (Dark Matter WIMP Search with Noble Liquids) experiment. We perform detailed Monte Carlo simula- tions of the expected backgrounds, considering realistic energy resolutions and thresholds in the detector. In a low-energy window of 2–30 keV, where the sensitivity to solar pp and 7Be-neutrinos is highest, an integrated pp-neutrino rate of 5900 events can be reached in a fiducial mass of 14 tons of natural xenon, after 5 years of data. The pp-neutrino flux could thus be measured with a statistical uncertainty around 1%, reaching the precision of so- lar model predictions. These low-energy solar neutrinos will be the limiting background to the dark matter search channel for WIMP-nucleon cross sections below ∼2×10−48 cm2 and WIMP masses around 50 GeV·c−2, for an assumed 99.5% rejection of electronic recoils due to elastic neutrino-electron scatters.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Neutrino Programme Laura Baudis Nicola Serra Alain Blondel
    Swiss Neutrino Programme Laura Baudis Nicola Serra Alain Blondel Teresa Montaruli Antonio Ereditato André Rubbia Swiss Neutrino Programme Basic Neutrino Properties Neutrino Oscillation Physics (supported by relevant theoretical activities) Year 2015 FTE: 19 PhD students, 21.5 PostDocs, 10.25 Senior, 9 Technicians. (30 June 2015, CHIPP) I. Kreslo, 1.04.2016 RECFA visit to Switzerland -- ETHZ 2 Past results from experiments on neutrino properties Search for Majorana neutrinos with the first two years of EXO-200 data, J. B. Albert et al, (EXO collaboration), Nature 510, (2014) 229±234 First Search for Lorentz and CPT Violation in Double Beta Decay with EXO-200, J. B. Albert et al, (EXO collaboration), arXiv:1601.07266 (2016) 6 pp. Results on Neutrinoless Double-β Decay of Ge76 from Phase I of the GERDA Experiment M. Agostini et al. (GERDA Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 122503 I. Kreslo, 1.04.2016 RECFA visit to Switzerland -- ETHZ 3 Past results from neutrino oscillation experiments Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation by the K2K Experiment, M. H. Ahn et al. (K2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006), 072003 Indication of Electron Neutrino Appearance from an Accelerator-Produced Off-Axis Muon Neutrino Beam K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 041801 Observation of Electron Neutrino Appearance in a Muon Neutrino Beam K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 061802 Measurements of π± differential yields from the surface of the T2K replica target for incoming 31 GeV/c protons with the NA61/SHINE spectrometer at the CERN SPS N. Abgrall et al., CERN-EP-2016-057, arXiv:1603.06774 Discovery of tau neutrino appearance in the CNGS neutrino beam with the OPERA experiment, N.
    [Show full text]
  • European Astroparticle Physics Strategy
    European priorities for Astroparticle Physics M. Spiro IN2P3/CNRS AppEC Chairman 1 What is ApPEC? ¾ ApPEC created in 2001 by the national funding agencies of France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and UK. ¾ Since then Spain, Belgium, Portugal, Greece, Switzerland and Poland have joined ¾ ApPEC aims to ¾ Promote and facilitate co-operation within the European Particle Astrophysics (PA) community ¾ Develop and promulgate long term strategies for European PA, offering advice to national funding agencies and EU ¾ Assist in improving links and co-ordination between European PA and the scientific programmes of organisations such as CERN, ESA, and ESO ¾ Express their collective views on PA in appropriate international forums, such as OECD, UNESCO etc. 2 Operation ¾ ApPEC operates ¾ Strategically through its Steering Committee, ¾ Operationally through its Peer Review Committee ¾ Steering Committee (SC): ¾ France: M.Spiro, P.Chomaz, S.Katsanevas Germany: T. Berghöfer, R.Köpke, H. Bluemer, Netherlands: F. Linde, UK: D. Miller, J. Womerseley , Italy: R. Petronzio B. Dettore, Spain: J. Fuster, A.Ferrer, Switzerland: M. Bourquin, Belgium: D. Bertrand, C. DeClerq, Portugal K. Gaspar Greece: D. Nanopoulos Poland S. Pokorski , Romania NV. Zamfir, CERN: D. Schlatter ¾ Peer Review Committee (PRC) ¾ Elena Aprile, Laura Baudis, Jose Bernabeu, Pierre Binetruy,Christian Spiering, Franz v. Feilitzsch, Enrique Fernandez,Andrea Giuliani, Werner Hofmann, Uli Katz, Paul Kooijman, Paolo Lipari, Manel Martinez, Antonio Masiero,Benoit Mours, Francesco Ronga, Sheila Rowan, Andre Rubbia, Subir Sarkar, Guenther Sigl, Gerard Smadja, Nigel Smith, Lucia Votano 3 The ASPERA program ¾ ASPERA, 14 countries ( ApPEC+ Czech republic +Sweden + CERN) funded by EU in 2006 for 3 years for coordination actions ¾ Coordinator S.
    [Show full text]
  • DARWIN Dark Matter Wimp Search with Noble Liquids
    DARWIN DARk matter WImp search with Noble liquids Laura Baudis University of Zurich (on behalf of the DARWIN Consortium) darwin.physik.uzh.ch IDM2010 University of Montpellier, July 30, 2010 Friday, July 30, 2010 1 ARRENBERG, BAUDIS, KONG, MATCHEV, AND YOO PHYSICAL REVIEW D 78, 056002 (2008) proportional light signals induced by particles interacting sensitive to both SD and SI WIMP-nucleon couplings. The in the sensitive liquid xenon (LXe) volume. The 3D posi- production of bubbles is monitored optically and via sound tion sensitivity, the self-shielding of LXe, and the prompt emission, reaching a reconstructed 3D spatial resolution of versus proportional light ratio are the most important back- 1 mm. It allows one to reject boundary events and to ground rejection features. The first results, using identify multiple neutron interactions. The most recent 136 kg-days exposure after cuts, demonstrated that COUPP results set the most sensitive limit on SD WIMP- LXe can be used for stable, homogeneous, large scale proton cross sections for a WIMP mass below 30 GeV. As dark matter detectors, providing excellent position resolu- an example, the upper bound on the SD coupling is 2:7 1  tion and discrimination against the electron recoil back- 10À pb at a WIMP mass of 40 GeV. ground. The derived upper bound on SI cross sections on In Fig. 8 we show the current CDMS and XENON10 8 nucleons is 4:5 10À pb for a WIMP mass of 30 GeV. upper bounds for the SI cross section together with pro- Since natural Xe contains 129Xe (26.4%) and 131Xe jected sensitivities for SuperCDMS 25 kg, XENON100, (21.2%) isotopes, each of these having an unpaired neu- and for a ton-scale detector.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Searches for Cold Relics of the Early Universe Laura Baudis University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
    22nd Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics at Stanford University, Dec. 13-17, 2004 Underground Searches for Cold Relics of the Early Universe Laura Baudis University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA We have strong evidence on all cosmic scales, from galaxies to the largest structures ever observed, that there is more matter in the universe than we can see. Galaxies and clusters would fly apart unless they would be held together by material which we call dark, because it does not shine in photons. Although the amount of dark matter and its distribution are fairly well established, we are clueless regarding its composition. Leading candidates are Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), which are ’cold’ thermal relics of the Big Bang, ie moving non-relativistically at the time of structure formation. These particles can be detected via their interaction with nuclei in deep-underground, low-background detectors. Experiments dedicated to observe WIMP interactions for the first time reach sensitivities allowing to probe the parameter space predicted by supersymmetric theories of particle physics. Current results of high sensitivity direct detection experiments are discussed and the most promising projects of the future are presented. If a stable new particle exists at the weak scale, it seems likely to expect a discovery within this decade. 1. Introduction fundamental physics at the weak scale. More than seventy years after Zwicky’s first ac- counts of dark matter in galaxy clusters [1], and thirty 2. Direct Detection of WIMPs five years after Rubin’s measurements of rotational ve- locities of spirals [2], the case for non-baryonic dark WIMPs can be detected directly, via their scatter- matter remains convincing.
    [Show full text]
  • Input from the DARWIN Collaboration to the European Strategy for Particle Physics
    Input from the DARWIN collaboration to the European Strategy for Particle Physics The DARWIN principal investigators: Elena Aprile (Columbia University), Francesco Arneodo (New York University Abu Dhabi), Laura Baudis (University of Zurich), Amos Breskin (Weizmann Institute of Science), Ethan Brown (Rensse- laer Polytechnic Institute), Ranny Budnik (Weizmann Institute of Science), Auke-Pieter Colijn (Nikhef and the University of Amsterdam), Jan Conrad (Stockholm University), Patrick Decowski (Nikhef and the University of Amsterdam), Guido Drexlin (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Klaus Eitel (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Ralph Engel (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Alfredo Ferella (Stockholm University), Walter Fulgione (INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso), Horst Fischer (Universit¨atFreiburg), Peter Fischer (Heidelberg University), Michelle Galloway (University of Zurich), Luca Grandi (University of Chicago), Stephanie Hansmann-Menzemer (Heidelberg University), Bernhard Holzapfel (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Ben Kilminster (University of Zurich), Lawrence Krauss (Arizona State University), Rafael Lang (Purdue University), Manfred Lindner (Max-Planck-Institute f¨urNuclear Physics, Heidelberg), Teresa Marrod´anUndagoitia (Max- Planck-Institute f¨urNuclear Physics, Heidelberg), Jos´eA. Matias Lopez (University of Coimbra), Carla Macolino (LAL, Uni- versit´eParis-Sud), Kaixuan Ni (University of California, San Diego), Uwe Oberlack (Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨atMainz), Gabriella Sartorelli (University of Bologna
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Facilities and Infrastructure Laura Baudis (U
    Report Underground Facilities and Infrastructure Laura Baudis (U. Zurich) Jeter Hall (SNOLAB) Kevin Lesko (LBNL) John Orrell (PNNL) 8 October 2020 1 Underground Facilities and Infrastructure Frontier Laura Baudis (U. Zurich) Jeter Hall (SNOLAB) Kevin Lesko (LBNL) John Orrell (PNNL) Topical Group Topical Group co-Conveners and Liaisons Co-conveners Liaisons Neutrinos Accelerator Neutrinos 0νββ Albert de Roeck UF01 Underground Facilities for Neutrinos Tim Bolton Patrick Decowski Astronomical ν Danielle Speller Gabriel Orebi Gann LXe DM LAr DM Particle DM Kaixuan Ni Emilija Pantic Hugh Lippincott UF02 Underground Facilities for Cosmic Frontier Jodi Cooley Low Mass Instrumentation Scott Hertel Eric Dahl Gravity Waves Instrumentation Frontier UF03 Underground Detectors Laura Cadonati Maurice Garcia-Sciveres Low Background Radon Cleanliness UF04 Supporting Capabilities Assay Richard Schnee Alvine Kamaha Brianna Mount Nuclear Astrophysics Geo-microbiology Geo-engineering QIS, QC UF05 Synergistic Research Daniel Robertson TBD TBD Maurice Garcia-Sciveres Early Career An Integrated Strategy for Underground Laura Baudis Jeter Hall UF06 Pietro Giampa Facilities and Infrastructure Kevin Lesko John Orrell William Thompson UF Topical Areas • UF1 – Neutrinos – Accelerator-based Neutrinos • e.g., LBNF/DUNE, Hyper-K – Non-accelerator Neutrinos • e.g., Supernova, solar, atmospheric, background n’s – Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay • Nuclear Physics in US, but large HEP & UG overlap • UF2 – Cosmic Frontier – Direct detection of dark matter in underground locations • UF3 – General Underground Detectors – e.g., New technologies, R&D/small-scale exp., QIS, gravity 3 UF Topical Areas • UF4 – Supporting Capabilities – Low-background methods, cryogenics, other supporting… not necessarily UG, but needed for UG experiments • UF5 – Synergistic Research – Non-HEP UG science: Geo., Bio., Eng., Nuc.
    [Show full text]
  • 0.0.1 XENON Articles
    0.0.1 XENON Articles - The Search for Dark Matter Laura Baudis, European Review, Volume 26, Issue 1 February 2018, pp. 70-81, arXiv:1801.08128 - A Dual-phase Xenon TPC for Scintillation and Ionisation Yield Measurements in Liquid Xenon Laura Baudis, Yanina Biondi, Chiara Capelli, Michelle Galloway, Shingo Kazama, Alexander Kish, Payam Pakarha, Francesco Piastra, Julien Wulf, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) no.5, 351, arXiv:1712.08607 - Search for Bosonic Super-WIMP Interactions with the XENON100 Experiment E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys.Rev. D96 (2017) no.12, 122002, arXiv:1709.02222 - The XENON1T dark matter experiment E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) no.12, 881, arXiv:1705.01828 - First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) no. 18, 181301, arXiv:1705.06655 - Effective field theory search for high-energy nuclear recoils using the XENON100 dark matter detector E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) no.4, 042004, arXiv:1705.02614 - Material radioassay and selection for the XENON1T dark matter experiment E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) no.12, 890, arXiv:1705.01828 - Search for WIMP Inelastic Scattering off Xenon Nuclei with XENON100 E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) no.2, 022008, arXiv:1705.05830 1 - Search for magnetic inelastic dark matter with XENON100 E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), JCAP 1710 (2017) no.10, 039, arXiv:1704.05804 Oral Presentations - L. Baudis: Illuminating the dark side: direct searches for cold dark matter in the Milky Way Elisabeth Spreadbury Lecture, UCL, London, March 14, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Astroparticle Physics – the European Strategy
    the European strategy C M J CM MJ CJ CMJ N Members of the Roadmap Committee, 2008 Elena Aprile Laura Baudis Jose Bernabeu Pierre Binetruy Christian Spiering (chair) Franz v. Feilitzsch Aspera Working Group Leads Enrique Fernandez Andrea Giuliani Dark Matter: Werner Hofmann Gabriel Chardin Uli Katz Nigel Smith Paul Kooijman Neutrino Mass: Paolo Lipari Andrea Guiliani Manel Martinez Fabrice Piquemal Antonio Masiero Stefan Schönert Benoit Mours Francesco Ronga Megaton Detector: Sheila Rowan Aldo Ianni André Rubbia André Rubbia Subir Sarkar Charged Cosmic Rays Günther Sigl Andreas Haungs Gerard Smadja Günther Sigl Jenny !omas Lucia Votano Gamma Rays Werner Hofmann Editorial Board Manel Martinez Maurice Bourquin High Energy Neutrinos Stavros Katsanevas Uli Katz Arnaud Marsollier Gravitational Waves Deborah Miller Harald Lück Christian Spiering Michele Punturo Rob van der Meer Graphic design Arnaud Marsollier Didier Rouable Towards a European Strategy for Astroparticle Physics HYSIC LE P S TIC R A P Astroparticle Physics is a rapidly growing field of research at the intersection of astrophy- AS T R sics, particle and nuclear physics and cosmology. It addresses questions like the nature of O Y P G H O Y L dark matter and dark energy; the stability of protons and the physics of the Big Bang; S O E I L C M A ST TIC S the properties of neutrinos and their role in cosmic evolution; the interior of the Sun or S ROPAR O PHYSICS supernovae as seen with neutrinos; the origin of cosmic rays and the view of the sky at C extreme energies; and violent cosmic processes as seen with gravitational waves.
    [Show full text]