Key to the Dung Beetles in Sumatran Oil Palm (BEFTA)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Key to the Dung Beetles in Sumatran Oil Palm (BEFTA) Key to the Dung Beetles in Sumatran Oil Palm (BEFTA) Max Brown, Eleanor Slade & Darren Mann 1 Sexing dung beetles HORNS ♀ ♂ 2 Higher level key to Scarabaeidae and Aphodiinae 1.A –Asymmetrical antennal club 3-7 segmented and lamellate, segments able to fit together closely. Pronotum not covering 2.A - Midcoxae extending along anterior head. Foretibia flattened with one or more 3.A - Pygidium almost always exposed and posterior axis, trochanters widely separated. Key to genera teeth on outer edge. Tarsi have 5 distinct with rounded body shape (except Oniticellini) segments. Abdomen has 6 ventral sclerites. Elytra not widely separated at apex. 3.B - Pygidium covered by apex of elytra, Aphodiinae 2.B - Midcoxae extend inwards, lying laterally usually less than 6mm and parallel sided with trochanters close, not a dung beetle. 1.B - None of the above, not a dung beetle 1.A – Dung 1.B – Not a 2.A – Dung 2.B – Not a Beetle Dung Beetle Beetle Dung Beetle 3.A – Pygidium almost 3.B – Pygidium almost always exposed always covered by elytra 3 Key to Genera 4.A - Scutellum clearly visible 5.A - Two dents at the base of the pronotum, a large species Onitis sp. 1 between the bases of the elytra >15mm and lacking front tarsi 5.B - None of the above 6.A - Strongly raised elytral striae, punctured in posterior Liatongus femoratus pronotum only, femorae orange. Smaller species <10mm 6.B - Dorso-ventrally flattened, Oniticellus tesselatus very small scutellum, bicoloured yellow and black striped elytra 4.B - Scutellum not visible 7.A - Very dorso-ventrally flattened. Large ring like punctures on pronotum. Parallell sided and <6mm. Females with hairy Eodrepanus sp aff. striatus tufts on the pronotum and tufts down elytral striae. 8.A - Large >20mm, all black, pronotum granulate 7.B - None of the above Catharsius sp aff. renaudpauliani 8.B - Small 4- 9.A - Onthophagus spp with four pronounced teeth on the 16mm, forelegs – most of the Sumatran oil palm Dung Beetles in this Onthophagini genus. 9.B - Very small <4mm, three outer teeth and nearly 90 degree angle on first tooth on front tibia. Male with single conspicuous horn on head Caccobius unicornis Note that some specimens are teneral, i.e. just emerged, and will not show the exact colour patterns seen in the key. This should be kept in mind 4 when seeing a light brown dung beetle specimen. 3.B Aphodiinae, Parallel sided Aphodius sp and pygidium completely covered by elytra 4.A Scutellum 4.B Scutellum not visible. visible e.g Onthophagus species 5 5.A – Two dents at the base 5.B – No large dents of the pronotum – Onitis. at the base of the pronotum 6.A – Strongly raised elytral 6.B - Very small striae and orange femora – scutellum, yellow Liatongus femoratus with black markings and dorso-ventrally flattened – Oniticellus tesselatus 7.B – Parallel sided, no visisble scutellum, ring like pronotal punctuation. Elytra with lines of bristles Strongly dorso-ventrally flattened – Eodrepanus sp aff. striatus 6 8.A – Very large, 8.B – >20mm, all black, Onthophagini, 4- pronotum granulate 16mm Catharsius spp. 9.A – Onthophagus has four pronounced teeth with larger angle on first tibial tooth. 9.B – Caccobius unicornis has three pronounced teeth with smaller angle on first tibial tooth. 7 Onthophagus group 1 9.A - Onthophagus 12.A - Distinctly sp with four shaped notched pronounced teeth 11.A - Pale yellowish clypeus. Brown on the forelegs – brown colour that antennae. Small 4- O. luridipennis most of the is punctured with 6mm Sumatran oil palm black. Dung Beetles in this genus. 12.B - More rounded clypeus. O. rectecornutus Light orange antennae. Large 7- 8mm 11.B - None of the Continue to above Onthophagus Group 2 12.A – Notched clypeus, dark 12.B – Rounded clypeus and brown antennae. Male has orange antennae – two pronotal bumps – Onthophagus rectocornutus Onthophagus luridipennis 11.A – Pale brown colour, punctured with black, top is Onthophagus rectecornutus, bottom is Onthophagus luridipennis 8 Onthophagus Group 2 10.B - Onthophagus species with four 13.A - Body, pronotum pronounced teeth and elytra covered in on the forelegs – long, erect hairs. Eyes O. echinus most of the very large in relation 14.A - Shiny green Sumatran oil palm to body size. 4-5mm Dung Beetles are in 13.B - Body not this genus. covered in long, 14.B - Brown O. vigilans erect hairs, but may have pubescence 15.A - Punctuation fading towards base of pronotum. Often two bumps on pronotum in males. Mostly all matt black , except orange femora. O. ventralis Sometimes orange streak on outer edge of pronotum. 16.A - Pronotum 17.A – Upper body very 15.B – not as completely and coarsely punctured. above evenly Completely black or with O. orientalis punctured. glossy green pronotum. Hairy. Large ~ 8mm 18.A - Yellow 19.A - Three colouration bumps on glossy 17.B - Not around edges of green pronotum coarsely elytra(anterior O. trituber and wavy yellow punctured and posterior) or elytral bands extensively on the elytra 19.B – One bump on 18.B - Matt pronotum. Yellow O. limbatus appearance, with elytral border. May yellow pronotal be broken. flanks in most cases. O. obscurior Pubescence towards outer elytra, no hairs across central elytra. 16.B - 20.A - All glossy black small beetle Pronotum with orange antennae. Basal margin either with bald impunctate, otherwise evenly patches on punctured and hairy throughout. either side that O. foedus Male has deep punctuation on back are surrounded of fore femora. Pubesence on by longer setae, pronotum and all interstriae. or basal margin impunctate. 21.A - Female two ridges on 20.B - Glossy red head. Male single or green horn. Often coloured O. waterstradi yellow flecks at pronotum, with top of elytra and smooth patch often yellow and long setae at pygidium edge of pronotum 21.B – None of 22.A - Short ridge above features. on head – O. crassicollis 22.B - Long9 ridge on head between eyes – O. liliputanus 13.A – Long, erect 14.A - Shining green hairs and large eyes Onthophagus aff. echinus in relation to body. 13.A – Pubescence - shorter and less 14.B - Pale Brown – erect hairs. Small Onthophagus vigilans eyes. 15.A – punctuation fades towards base of pronotum. Often two bumps on pronotum. Mostly orange femora – Onthophagus ventralis 10 16.A – Pronotum 17.A – Large. Upper body very mostly evenly coarsely punctured. Completely punctured. Almost black or with glossy green always two small pronotum. Hairy – bumps on either side Onthophagus orientalis of pronotum. 16.B – Pronotum with smooth patch surrounded by longer hairs or basal margin impunctate. 17.B – Not coarsely punctured on pronotum and elytra. 11 18.A – Orange- 18.B – Matt appearance yellow around edges throughout, yellow of elytra or pronotal flanks - extensively on elytra Onthophagus obscurior in a distinctive pattern. 19.A – three bumps on 20.A - An all glossy pronotum except in black small beetle minor male, pronotum with orange shiny green; yellow antennae. Basal wavy elytral bands margin inpunctate, always present – otherwise evenly Onthophagus trituber punctured and hairy throughout – Onthophagus foedus 19.B – only ever a single bump on pronotum; pronotum not shiny green; yellow broken elytral border – Onthophagus limbatus 12 21.A –Male single horn. 20.B – Glossy red or green ♂ pronotum, with smooth Female two ridges on patch and long setae at head Often yellow flecks edge of pronotum. at top of elytra and often yellow pygidium - Onthophagus waterstradi ♀ 13 22.A – Onthophagus crassicollis Short basal ridge on head. Pronotum lighter green/brown. Very long and curved basal segment of hind tarsus. 22.B – Onthophagus lilliputanus – Pronotum Front femora narrower, with longer teeth. dark green. Basal ridge on head nearly touching both eyes. 14 Aphodiinae 15 Onitis sp. 1 16 Liatongus femoratus 17 Oniticellus tesselatus 18 Eodrepanus sp near striatulus 19 Catharsius aff. renaudpailiani ♀ ♂ 20 Onthophagus luridipennis 21 Onthophagus rectecornutus ♀ ♂ 22 Onthophagus aff. echinus ♀ ♂ 23 Onthophagus vigilans ♀ ♂ 24 Onthophagus ventralis ♀ ♂ 25 Onthophagus orientalis ♀ ♂ 26 Onthophagus trituber ♀ ♂ 27 Onthophagus limbatus ♀ ♂ 28 Onthophagus obscurior ♀ ♂ 29 Onthophagus foedus 30 Onthophagus waterstradi ♀ ♂ 31 Onthophagus crassicollis ♀ ♂ 32 Onthophagus lilliputanus 33 Catharsius sp. 8.A - Large >20mm, al black, pronotum granulate 10.A - Underside of thorax between front two legs a row of hairs – renaudpauliana turn beetle towards the light 10.B - Underside of thorax between front two legs no hairs– turn dayacus beetle towards the light 10.A – Row of hairs between legs on a ridge - 10.B – No row of hairs between C. renaudpauliani legs on a ridge - C. dayacus 34.
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Iberian Dung Beetles Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae): Insights on the Evolution of Nesting Behavior
    J Mol Evol +2002) 55:116±126 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-002-2314-4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Iberian Dung Beetles Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae): Insights on the Evolution of Nesting Behavior Soraya Villalba,Jorge M. Lobo,Fermõ  n Martõ n-Piera,* Rafael Zardoya Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Jose Gutie rrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain Received: 22 October 2001 / Accepted: 25 January 2002 Abstract. A phylogeny of the main lineages of dung Introduction beetles +Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) from the Iberian Peninsula was based on partial nucleotide sequences The Scarabaeinae +dung beetles) are a worldwide- +about 1221 bp) of the mitochondrial cytochrome distributed, highly successful subfamily of Coleoptera oxidase I and II genes of 33 taxa. Our phylogenetic with nearly 5000 species grouped in 234 genera analyses con®rmed the validity and composition of +Hanski and Cambefort 1991). Ever since Linnaeus' most of the recognized tribes within the subfamily. Systema Naturae, dung beetles have received wide Interestingly, the Onitini showed an evolutionary rate attention from entomologists because of their singu- signi®cantly higher than that of the other tribes. The lar adaptations in exploiting vertebrate dung pads molecular phylogeny supports a sister-group rela- +e.g., Fabre 1897, 1899; Heymons and von Lengerken tionship of the tribes Onitini and Oniticellini + On- 1922; Burmeister 1930; Heymons 1930; Prasse 1957; thophagini. A close relationship of Scarabaeini, Rommel, 1961; Balthasar 1963; Halter and Matth- Gymnopleurini, and Sisyphini is also suggested but ews 1966; Halter and Edmonds 1982). Scarabaeids lacks bootstrap support. Surprisingly, the Coprini, are one of the best-studied groups of beetles in terms which had always been related to the Oniticellini and of taxonomy +Janssens 1949; Balthasar 1963; Iablo- Onthophagini, were placed closer to the Scarabaeini, kov-Khnzorian 1977; Zunino 1984; Browne and Gymnopleurini, and Sisyphini.
    [Show full text]
  • Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and Horse Dung: the Importance of Mouthpart Traits, Body Size, and Nesting Behavior in the Community Assembly Process
    life Article Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and Horse Dung: The Importance of Mouthpart Traits, Body Size, and Nesting Behavior in the Community Assembly Process Mattia Tonelli 1,2,* , Victoria C. Giménez Gómez 3, José R. Verdú 2, Fernando Casanoves 4 and Mario Zunino 5 1 Department of Pure and Applied Science (DiSPeA), University of Urbino “Carlo Bo”, 61029 Urbino, Italy 2 I.U.I CIBIO (Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad), Universidad de Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain; [email protected] 3 Instituto de Biología Subtropical, Universidad Nacional de Misiones–CONICET, 3370 Puerto Iguazú, Argentina; [email protected] 4 CATIE, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, 30501 Turrialba, Costa Rica; [email protected] 5 Asti Academic Centre for Advanced Studies, School of Biodiversity, 14100 Asti, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Dung beetles use excrement for feeding and reproductive purposes. Although they use a range of dung types, there have been several reports of dung beetles showing a preference for certain feces. However, exactly what determines dung preference in dung beetles remains controversial. In the present study, we investigated differences in dung beetle communities attracted to horse or cow dung from a functional diversity standpoint. Specifically, by examining 18 functional traits, Citation: Tonelli, M.; Giménez we sought to understand if the dung beetle assembly process is mediated by particular traits in Gómez, V.C.; Verdú, J.R.; Casanoves, different dung types. Species specific dung preferences were recorded for eight species, two of which F.; Zunino, M. Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and prefer horse dung and six of which prefer cow dung.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Genera Tiniocellus Péringuey, 1901 and Nitiocellus Gen
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 47 (2010) : 71‒126. REVISION OF THE GENERA TINIOCELLUS PÉRINGUEY, 1901 AND NITIOCELLUS GEN. N. (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE, ONITICELLINI) Tristão Branco Rua de Camões, 788, 2º Dto, P-4000-142 Porto, Portugal − [email protected] Abstract: The taxonomical history of the genus Tiniocellus Péringuey, 1901 and the 10 species-group names that have been associated with it is reviewed, and the reasons that justify the creation of Nitiocellus gen. n. for Oniticellus panthera Boucomont, 1921 and Oniticellus collarti Janssens, 1939, are explained. The taxonomy of the Oniticellini is briefly reviewed and a key is provided for the separation of Tiniocellus and Nitiocellus gen. n. from all the other genera currently ranged in the tribe. The synonymies of Oniticellus variegatus Fåhraeus, 1857 and Oniticellus humilis Gerstaecker, 1871 with Tiniocellus spinipes (Roth, 1851) are confirmed. The Asian Tiniocellus imbellis (Bates, 1891) and the African Tiniocellus setifer (Kraatz, 1895) are rehabilitated as good species. Oniticellus modestus Arrow, 1908 is synonymised with T. imbellis, and Tiniocellus asmarensis Balthasar, 1968 with T. spinipes. Three Afrotropical species, one of them containing two subspecies, are described: T. praetermissus sp. n. from western Africa, T. dolosus sp. n. from eastern, central and western Africa, T. eurypygus sp. n. from South Africa, the nominotypical subspecies from the uplands west of the Drakensberg mountain range, and T. eurypygus transdrakensbergensis ssp. n. from the lowlands east of the same mountain range. Keys are provided to the species and sub- species of Tiniocellus, and to the species of Nitiocellus gen. n. For this study 4,628 specimens were examined, including the name-bearing types of all the species-group names, except that of T.
    [Show full text]
  • Oniticellus (Liatongus)
    Zootaxa 3974 (1): 145–147 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3974.1.13 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC597535-68B3-45C5-BBF2-AD0287A15A4C Oniticellus (Liatongus) boucomonti Balthasar, 1932 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Oniticellini)—clarification of its taxonomic status by lectotype designation ALEŠ BEZDĚK1, DAVID KRÁL2 & FRANTIŠEK X. J. SLÁDEČEK1,3 1Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] 2Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ-128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] 3Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] The dung beetle Oniticellus (Liatongus) boucomonti Balthasar, 1932 was described according to an unknown number of specimens labelled “Giufu-Shan, Szechuan” [= Jinfo Shan, ca. 29°04′N, 107°18′E, Chongqing province, China]. Balthasar evidently did not dissect these specimens and simply assumed that specimens with a small horn on vertex were males and specimens without such horn but with two elevated transversal carinae on head were the females of the same species (Balthasar 1932, 1935). Later, Janssens (1953) claimed that the type series of O. (L.) boucomonti was a mixture of two species. Specimens considered males by Balthasar were actually identical to the female of Liatongus denticornis (Fairmaire, 1887), and those sexed as females were identical to the female of L.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Beetles Recorded to Visit Elephant Dung In
    Journal of Wildlife and Parks (2014) 29 : 45-48 45 BEETLES RECORDED TO VISIT ELEPHANT DUNG IN TEMENGGOR FOREST, MALAYSIA Thary Gazi Goh*1, Johannes Huijbregts2, Hii Ning3 & Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz3 1Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, Postbus 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 3School of Geography, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Little is known about the beetles associated with Elephant dung in the South East Asian region. Elephant dung was inspected for beetles by manually pulling apart dung present at elephant salt licks. Two sites were visited on 3 occasions and at least 20 piles of dung were inspected on each visit. 11 taxa of dung beetle were collected, Copris numa, Cp. bellator, Cp. doriae, Copris sp., Heliocopris tyrannus, Liatongus femoratus, Paragymnopleurus maurus, Sisyphus thoracicus, Onthophagus mulleri, O. rutilans and Megatelus sp. Most species were from the large tunnelers class in comparison to small tunnelers that tend to dominate other types of dung. While this is merely a preliminary sample, most of the species encountered have not been found in locations where elephants are absent. Larva of Campsiura nigripennis, a flower beetle was found to dwell inside the dung. The larvae were successfully bred to adulthood in elephant dung in laboratory conditions. Predatory Histeridae were found to also oviposit on the dung, in which the larvae preyed on other beetle and fly larva. One larva in a dung ball possibly belonging to Paragymnopleurus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Dung Inhabiting Insects, Their Diversity, Abundance and Bio
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2021; 9(2): 537-546 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Dung inhabiting insects, their diversity, abundance and www.entomoljournal.com JEZS 2021; 9(2): 537-546 bio ecology of coprine beetles © 2021 JEZS Received: 24-01-2021 Accepted: 28-02-2021 Sumana Saha, Avirup Ghosh, Arghya Biswas and Dinendra Sumana Saha Raychaudhuri Post Graduate, Department of Zoology, Barasat Government College, 10, K.N.C. Road, DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/j.ento.2021.v9.i2h.8532 Barasat, Kolkata, West Bengal, India Abstract The insects most prominently colonized in a nutrient-rich fresh dung habitat are mainly beetles and flies Avirup Ghosh and the group is termed collectively, the dung community. Coprophagous insects play an important role Post Graduate, Department of in tropical ecosystems by providing essential functions including mechanically breaking down excrement Zoology, Barasat Government into smaller-sized particles, mixing of organic matter in the soil, soil aeration, nutrient cycling and to College, 10, K.N.C. Road, remove unhealthy materials from their surroundings. Against this backdrop, present study is an attempt to Barasat, Kolkata, West Bengal, assess the insect diversity and abundance inhabiting dairy farm dung community in North & South 24 India Parganas, West Bengal along with the study on the life cycle pattern of frequently encountered dung beetle taxa, Oniticellus cinctus (Fabricius) and to observe their role in the decomposition. Altogether 2 Arghya Biswas Post Graduate, Department of dung beetles, 4 dung loving beetles, 8 dung loving flies, 17 dung associated insects of different groups, Zoology, Barasat Government one mesostigmatic mite species are recorded from cow and buffalo dung community during the study College, 10, K.N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Classification and Phylogeny of an Afrotropical Species Group Based on Molecular and Morphological Data, with the Descri
    Org Divers Evol DOI 10.1007/s13127-016-0297-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Revised classification and phylogeny of an Afrotropical species group based on molecular and morphological data, with the description of a new genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Onthophagini) Angela Roggero1 & Enrico Barbero1 & Claudia Palestrini1 Received: 27 January 2016 /Accepted: 22 July 2016 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2016 Abstract The worldwide distributed Onthophagus genus include the three genera into a single clade of suprageneric comprises at present more than 2000 species, that often show rank naming it as Phalops complex. a complicated and uncertain systematic history. In particular, the many Afrotropical species included in this genus have Keywords Onthophagus . New genus . Phalops complex . never been entirely reviewed after the division into 32 species Molecular analysis . Morphological analysis . Phylogeny . groups proposed by d’Orbigny in 1913, although subsequent Geometric morphometrics researches focusing on some of these species suggested that Onthophagus constituted a nonmonophyletic taxon. In order to highlight their phylogenetic relationships, the various Afrotropical species groups of d’Orbigny must thus be exam- Introduction ined, and it would be advisable to study them separately to avoid misunderstanding. In this framework, the taxonomic The widespread genus Onthophagus Latreille, 1802 com- position of the three species currently included in the 21st prises more than 2000 species and is thus one of the largest d’Orbigny group was examined. Both morphological and bio- genera in the world (Emlen et al. 2005). It was hypothesized molecular analyses contributed in confirming that these spe- that these dung beetles originated in Africa during the cies (i.e., Onthophagus caffrarius d’Orbigny, 1902; Oligocene (23–33 mya) concurrently with the expansion of Onthophagus quadraticeps Harold, 1867; and Onthophagus grassland habitats and the radiation of mammals (Ahrens et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) and the Separation of Dynastini and Oryctini
    Chromosome analyses challenge the taxonomic position of Augosoma centaurus Fabricius, 1775 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) and the separation of Dynastini and Oryctini Anne-Marie DUTRILLAUX Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, UMR 7205-OSEB, case postale 39, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Zissis MAMURIS University of Thessaly, Laboratory of Genetics, Comparative and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 41221 Larissa (Greece) Bernard DUTRILLAUX Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, UMR 7205-OSEB, case postale 39, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Dutrillaux A.-M., Mamuris Z. & Dutrillaux B. 2013. — Chromosome analyses challenge the taxonomic position of Augosoma centaurus Fabricius, 1775 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) and the separation of Dynastini and Oryctini. Zoosystema 35 (4): 537-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2013n4a7 ABSTRACT Augosoma centaurus Fabricius, 1775 (Melolonthidae: Dynastinae), one of the largest Scarabaeoid beetles of the Ethiopian Region, is classified in the tribe Dynastini MacLeay, 1819, principally on the basis of morphological characters of the male: large frontal and pronotal horns, and enlargement of fore legs. With the exception of A. centaurus, the 62 species of this tribe belong to ten genera grouped in Oriental plus Australasian and Neotropical regions. We performed cytogenetic studies of A. centaurus and several Asian and Neotropical species of Dynastini, in addition to species belonging to other sub-families of Melolonthidae Leach, 1819 and various tribes of Dynastinae MacLeay, 1819: Oryctini Mulsant, 1842, Phileurini Burmeister, 1842, Pentodontini Mulsant, 1842 and Cyclocephalini Laporte de Castelnau, 1840. The karyotypes of most species were fairly alike, composed of 20 chromosomes, including 18 meta- or sub-metacentric autosomes, one acrocentric or sub-metacentric X-chromosome, and one punctiform Y-chromosome, as that of their presumed common ancestor.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinâmica Evolutiva De Dnas Repetitivos Com Ênfase Em
    DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DE DNAS REPETITIVOS COM ÊNFASE EM ESPÉCIES DA TRIBO PHANAEINI SARAH GOMES DE OLIVEIRA Botucatu – SP 2013 UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “Julio de Mesquita Filho” INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS DE BOTUCATU DINÂMICA EVOLUTIVA DE DNAS REPETITIVOS COM ÊNFASE EM ESPÉCIES DA TRIBO PHANAEINI CANDIDATA: SARAH GOMES DE OLIVEIRA ORIENTADOR: CESAR MARTINS CO-ORIENTADORA: RITA DE CÁSSIA DE MOURA Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências, Câmpus de Botucatu, UNESP, para obtenção do título de Doutora no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Genética). Botucatu – SP 2013 @@ A A ? #","(=(!&$)@ "%/$",&#+*", )('*"*",&)&$3%)$)'2")*("& !%"%"B(!&$)#","(C&*+*+?F)@%G=JHIK )D&+*&(&EA%",()")*+#+#")*= %)*"*+*& "&"3%")&*+*+ ("%*&(?)( (*"%) &&("%*&(?"*.))" &+( ')?JHJHLHHH I@ @J@(&$&))&$&)@K@&#6'*(&@L@,&#+10&D"&#& "E@ M@ '$%*&(&$&))7$"&@ #,()A!,?&#&'*(> ('*"*",&>#$%*&)*(%)'&)"10&> ,&#+10&(&$&))7$">,&#+10&$&%(*&>$4#")$+#*" 3%")> (%)(3%"!&("-&%*#@ Dedico aos meus amados pais, por acreditarem. AGRADECIMENTOS A realização desta tese marca o final de uma importante etapa da minha vida. Gostaria de agradecer a todos que contribuíram de forma decisiva para a sua concretização: À minha amada família, que sempre me estimulou a crescer cientifica e pessoalmente; apoiando-me nos momentos de ansiedade, de desespero e de empolgação. Acima de tudo aos meus pais, Márcia e Manoel, pelo inestimável apoio familiar, pelo incentivo por toda a minha vida e, principalmente, durante esta trajetória na pós-graduação. À minha vozinha pelo carinho, amor e paciência revelados ao longo destes anos. Ao meu querido irmão Mauro e sua adorável esposa, pela compreensão e ternura manifestadas apesar da falta de atenção e ausências; e pela excitação e orgulho com que sempre reagiram aos meus resultados acadêmicos ao longo dos anos. Ao meu orientador, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dung Beetle Fauna of the Big Bend Region of Texas (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) William D
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2018 The dung beetle fauna of the Big Bend region of Texas (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) William D. Edmonds [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Edmonds, William D., "The dung beetle fauna of the Big Bend region of Texas (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)" (2018). Insecta Mundi. 1149. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/1149 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. July 27 2018 INSECTA 0642 1–30 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:55CCB217-771C-499D-9110- A Journal of World Insect Systematics 36F143C375C5 MUNDI 0642 The dung beetle fauna of the Big Bend region of Texas (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) W. D. Edmonds 2625 SW Brae Mar Ct. Portland, OR 97201 Date of issue: July 27, 2018 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL W. D. Edmonds The dung beetle fauna of the Big Bend region of Texas (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) Insecta Mundi 0642: 1–30 ZooBank Registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:55CCB217-771C-499D-9110-36F143C375C5 Published in 2018 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P.O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 USA http://centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Onthophagus Posticus-Group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of Australian Dung Beetles with Five New Species
    Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 58 Bicentenary of Ludwig Leichhardt: Contributions to Australia’s Natural History in honour of his scientific work exploring Australia Edited by Barbara Baehr © The State of Queensland, Queensland Museum 2013 PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 0079-8835 NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Director. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qm.qld.gov.au A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum A review of the Onthophagus posticus-group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of Australian dung beetles with five new species. G.B. MONTEITH Natural Environments Program, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane Qld 4101, Australia Email: [email protected] R.I. STOREY* Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry, PO Box 1054, Mareeba Qld 4880, Australia. *deceased 14 June 2008 Citation: Monteith, G.B. & Storey, R.I. 2013 10 10: A review of the Onthophagus posticus-group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of Australian dung beetles with five new species.Memoirs of the Queensland Museum – Nature 58: 55–72. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835.
    [Show full text]