DOCSLIB.ORG

Ernst Wolff Between Daily Routine and Violent Protest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ernst Wolff Between Daily Routine and Violent Protest Ernst Wolff Between Daily Routine and Violent Protest Ernst Wolff Between Daily Routine and Violent Protest Interpreting the Technicity of Action The publication of both paper and OA versions of this book was made possible by Internal Funds from the KU Leuven. ISBN 978-3-11-072497-4 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-072504-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-072514-8 DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110724974 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2021905145 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Ernst Wolff, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published open access at www.degruyter.com. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Preface Most human action has atechnical dimension. This book is afirst consolidation of my research into this simple fact.Onthe one hand it required an examination of the twoconstituents of the technicity of action:acquired capabilities and the means of action. On the other,Ihad to examine the interrelation between the technicity of action and how it is activated, givenits tension with normative con- siderations. Ihavefollowed the intuition thatthe technicity of actionstretches as far as human action itself, includingspheres of interaction wherethere are good reasons to fear atechnicistreduction of action, namely ethics and politics. Con- sequently, my studycovers the entire gamut of human action between the ex- tremes of dailyroutine and violent protest. Although it is clearlyimpossible to discuss every kind of human action, the chapters of this book cover asubstantial and representative selection of major forms of action. Moreover,the interdisciplinary cast of the book is aimed at ren- dering what can be considered corefeatures of action in all human beings, while giving us the means by which to remain attentive to the socio-historical partic- ularities of action as it plays out in different contexts. Hermeneutics (understood as the philosophical inquiry into the human phenomena of meaning,under- standing and interpretation) and social science (as the studyofall human af- fairs) represent the two main disciplinary orientations of this book. There are manybooks of philosophyand of social theory in which hermeneutics is simply understood as synonymous with the name of Hans-GeorgGadamer. In the Intro- duction Iexplain whyIhave instead chosen Paul Ricœur as my principal herme- neutic interlocutor for the purposes of this book. Previous versions of some of the chapters have been published elsewhere. I thank the journals and publishersfor permission to includetranslated, reworked and expandedversions of these texts here: “Transmettre et interpreter,” Médium 6(January-March 2006): 30 –47 / “Mediologie en hermeneutiek,” Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 47,no. 1(March 2007): 81–94; “Habitus – means – worldli- ness. Technics and the formation of ‘civilisations’,” in OliverKozlarek, Jörn Rüsen and Ernst Wolff, eds., Shaping aHumane World – Civilizations, Axial Times, Modernities,Humanisms (Bielefeld: Transcript,2012), 25–53; “Compéten- ces et moyens de l’homme capable àlalumièredel’incapacité,” Études Ricœuri- ennes /Ricœur Studies 4, no. 2(2013), 50 –63; “Ricœur et Giddens: l’herméneu- tique de l’homme capable et la théorie de structuration,” Études Ricœuriennes /Ricœur Studies 5, no. 2(2014), 105–127; “Of what is ‘Ricœur’ the name?Or, phi- losophising at the edge,” LeuvenPhilosophyNewsletter 26 (2018–2019), 7–22; and “Justice despite institutions. Strugglingfor agood life from the destitute OpenAccess. ©2021ErnstWolff, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110725049-001 VI Preface edge of society,” in Geoffrey Dierckxsens,ed., TheAmbiguity of Justice. New Per- spectives on Paul Ricœur’sApproach to Justice (Leiden: Brill, 2020), 97– 127. Over manyyears of ruminating on this project,Ihavehad the benefit of hos- pitality and funding for which Iwould like to express my gratitude. Iwas gener- ouslyreceivedbyJörn Rüsen (Kulturwissenschaftliches Institut in Essen), avisit partiallyfunded by the Mercator Stiftung,AxelHonneth (Goethe University in Frankfurt), supported by the Alexander vonHumboldt Stiftung,and Olivier Abel and Laurent Thévenot (in the framework of the Fonds Ricœur and the EHESS, Paris), wheretwo research visits werepartiallyfundedbythe National ResearchFoundation of South Africa at atime when Iwas still employed at the University of Pretoria. Iwould liketothank IdetteNoomé very warmlyfor her indefatigable work in editing the final manuscript.Rachel Mahlanguand her colleagues at the library of the University of Pretoria, and Stefan Derouck and his colleagues at the library of the KU Leuven deservemygrateful recognition for their servicestomeinthis project.Christoph Schirmer,MaraWeber,FlorianRuppenstein and their collea- gues at De Gruyter have accompanied me through the publication phase of this book in amost professional way. Finally, Iwould like to expressmydeepest gratitude to my wife and children for their patience and support. Ernst Wolff KU Leuven, May2020 Contents Introduction The Technical Dimension of Action 3 Basic Orientation: Approaching the Composition of Action 3 Ricœur and Social Theory 5 Ethics and Means in Ricœur.APreliminaryExploration 9 . Efficacy,without Abandoning Ethics 9 . An Ethics of LimitedViolence 12 . With and Against Ricœur 15 AContribution to Interpretive Social Theory 15 . Part 1: The Technicity of Action: Capabilities and Means 17 The Heat of Action 21 . Part 2: Finding Compromises in Practice 24 IntermediaryReflexion and Conclusion: Towards an Integrated Theoryof the Technicity of Action 27 Part : The Technicity of Action: Capabilities and Means Chapter 1: TheEffectiveness of Symbols: Mediologyand Hermeneutics 33 Introduction 33 Enter Mediology 34 The Technical Milieu and the World of Technology 36 . Transmission and Communication 37 . Transmission in the Mnemosphere 38 . Clothes: Transmission and Understanding 41 . No Mediologywithout Hermeneutics. No Milieu without a World 42 Autonomy and Appropriation 45 . Discourse as Action 46 . Autonomy and the Effectiveness of Symbols 47 . On Reception: Reading Texts and Artefacts 50 Vigilance and Politics 53 Conclusion 55 VIII Contents Chapter 2: Habitus – Means – Worldliness 58 Introduction: “Civilizing Processes” as Processes of Hominization 58 Human Technicity and the Civilizing Processes 63 Technics and Narrativity 66 . Prefiguration 67 . Configuration 70 . Refiguration 74 Conclusions 77 Chapter 3: Human Capabilities in the Light of Incapabilities 83 Introduction: AHypothesis on the Technicity of Capabilities 83 The Capable Human is the Incapable Human 86 . FiveFigures of Incapability 87 . Incapability as aPractical Horizon of Action. (In)capability as aMark of Uncertainty 91 . The Capable Human is the Finite Human 93 The Capable-Incapable Human Discloses the Technical Human 94 . Misrecognition of Incapability,Practical Horizon and Primary Technicity 95 . Reflection, Level of Competence and Secondary Technicity 95 Social Theoretical Horizon 97 Conclusion: The Technical Paradoxand its Political Relevance 100 Chapter 4: Organized Action: Agency, (In)capabilities and Means 103 Organized Action as Part of the Technicity of Action 103 Organized Action and the Agency of Organizations 105 . Entities of ParticipatoryBelonging andInstitutions 106 . Practices and the Example of AdvisoryBodies 112 . Social Capabilities 114 . Scales of Organized Action, its Capabilities and Means 116 Capabilities andIncapabilities of Organizations 119 Conclusion. Paradoxes, Risks, and Political Implications of Organized Action 124 . The ParadoxofOrganized Action 125 . Organized Action in the Social Sciences 126 Chapter 5: TheHermeneutics of Human Capabilities and the Theory of Structuration 128 Introduction 128 Contents IX Ricœur: Individuals and Society in the Hermeneutics of the Capable Human 131 . First Approach: Ricœur on Institutions 132 . Second Approach: Practices Between “Basic Actions” (Danto) and “Narrative UnityofHuman Life” (MacIntyre) 140 Giddens: Individual and Society in Structuration Theory 144 . Giddens: Action, the Original SociologicalProblem 144 . Giddens: Action and Duality of Structure – Some Specifications 147 Conclusion: Contributions of Structuration Theorytothe Hermeneuticsof the Capable Human 154 IntermediateReflection:Tools for Critique 159 Something Is at Stake 159 On Critique 160 Towards the Intricate Relations betweenTechnicity and Ethics 162 Working in Anticipation 163 Part : Finding Compromises in Practice Chapter 6: Of What Is “Ricœur” the Name?Or, Philosophising at the Edge 167 What’sinaName? 167 “The Colonial Question” 168 Ricœur’sAnticipation of GlobalPoliticsafter Independence 171 Ricœur’sView on the Philosophical and Cultural Critical Consequences of Decolonization 173 . Interim Conclusion: Disillusioned Modernity and the Task of Hermeneutics 177 Okolo –“Praxis Triggers the Hermeneutical Process and Gives it an Orientation” 180 . Taking Stock: Engagement without Promises 186 Conclusion: Philosophising at the Edge 188 Chapter 7: Acts of ViolenceasPolitical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Concept of the “Polylogue” and the Question of “Intercultural” Identity
    Intercultural Communication Studies XIX: 3 2010 Chen The Concept of the “Polylogue” and the Question of “Intercultural” Identity Hsueh-i Chen, National Taiwan Normal University In this study, two different ideas will be analyzed, the concept of the polylogue, which was developed by Franz Martin Wimmer, and the assumption of an intercultural identity. The complementary relationship between the two ideas will be expounded. In a polylogue, individuals are confronted with several dialogue partners from different cultures simultaneously; the term is used to emphasize that many perspectives need to be considered, rather than just two, as the word dialogue seems to imply. Due to its different approach, the idea of the polylogue will profoundly affect the structure of intercultural communication. This study also takes the multicultural nature of actual reality into account, presupposes the human ability to accept different cultures, and attempts to explore the relations between interculturally capable individuals and multicultural society. Under the assistance of a conception of an intercultural identity, finding one’s identity not only involves one’s own pre-existing tradition but also includes influences from other cultures as well. Employing the concept of the polylogue and relying on the human capacity for multicultural acceptance, individuals should be able to construct their own personal intercultural identities and communicate with others interculturally. The concept and term polylogue stems from Franz Martin Wimmer (Wimmer, 2004), a contemporary Austrian philosopher who employs the concept in order to surmount the so- called Eurocentrism in philosophical thinking. Not only does he criticize the standard, narrow-minded way of philosophizing, in using the term polylogue, he also intends to reject every possible form of cultural centrism, such as Sinocentrism and Americacentrism.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Newsletters
    APA Newsletters Volume 01, Number 2 Spring 2002 NEWSLETTER ON HISPANIC/LATINO ISSUES IN PHILOSOPHY FROM THE EDITOR, EDUARDO MENDIETA ARTICLES BENIGNO TRIGO “Latinamerican Genealogies: Appropriating Foucault” EDWARD DEMONCHONOK “Globalization, Postcoloniality, and Interculturality” INTERVIEWS LINDA MARTIN ALCOFF “Introduction: ‘Puerto Rican Studies in a German Philosophy Context: An Interview with Juan Flores’” LINDA MARTIN ALCOFF “Introduction: ‘A Philosophical Account of Africana Studies: An Interview with Lewis Gordon’” © 2002 by The American Philosophical Association ISSN: 1067-9464 APA NEWSLETTER ON Hispanic/Latino Issues in Philosophy Eduardo Mendieta, Editor Spring 2002 Volume 01, Number 2 States. He is known for his work on Frantz Fanon, race theory, phenomenology and Africana philosophy. His work is FROM THE EDITOR particularly significant because he has been bridging the divide between Latino Studies, Latin American philosophy, and Afro-Caribbean and Afro-American thought. These two Eduardo Mendieta “Afro-Latino” philosophers epitomize the cosmopolitanism and originality of an emergent paradigm in cultural studies In this issue of the newsletter we have been able include a and philosophy. version of the introduction to the recently published book The committee welcomes as a new chair Susana Foucault and Latin America, edited by Benigno Trigo. This Nuccetelli who has been appointed by the APA directors to wonderful collection gathers canonical texts from Latin take over Pablo DeGreiff, who resigned late last semester from American literary criticism and more recent contributions that the chairship. We are thankful to Prof. Nuccetelli for taking exhibit a creative appropriation of Foucault for the study of over this important job. We also congratulate her for the recent Latin America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Promise and Problems of Intercultural Philosophy
    The Promise and Problems of Inferculfural Philosophy Murray Hofmeyr Deporlment of Philosophy, University of Vendo Abstract In this paper I sketch the main elements of Heinz Kimmer/e's conceptualisation of intercultural phlïosophy: a new concept of difference that makes possible a new take on "different and equar~ which is the foundation for real dialogue. I interrogate the concept of culture in intercultural philosophYt and argue that for the South African context suffident emphasis must be ploeed on power relations as they impact on cultures and the legaey of a hlstory of cultural domination. / try to show that Kimmer/e's notion of the equa/ity of cultures imp/ies that a particu/ar context IS taken seriously as avalid instanee of the human condition, and in that sense it is of equal status with all other si/uations. All '/oealities" are linked in some way or another. /t thus belongs to adequate/y conceptualising the thoughts and feelings of a speC/fic locality that the need for dialogue should be ref/ected. A philosophy that negates these shifts would be dlsqualified as inadequate. The fact that it seeks dia/ogue IS indicative of the experience of an aporia. It IS loek, incomp/eteness, which IS universa!. I a/so tentatively propose "contex/ua/ phlïosophyl/ as a more appropriate name for intercultura/ philosophy in South Afriea. Introduction The first part of this paper is a description of the main elements of intercultural philosophy as conceptualised by the German philosopher Heinz Kimmerie, who taught at the Erasmus University in Rotterdam since 1976, and since his retirement in 1995 heads the Foundation for Intercultural Philosophy ond Art in Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • A Response to Defoort, Wenning, and Marchal
    Intercultural Philosophy and Intercultural Hermeneutics: A Response to Defoort, Wenning, and Marchal Eric S. Nelson Division of Humanities, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology [email protected] I. Introduction Carine Defoort, Mario Wenning, and Kai Marchal offer three ways of engaging with Chinese and Buddhist Philosophy in Early Twentieth-Century German Thought and the philosophical, hermeneutical, and historical issues it attempted to articulate and address.1 This work is historical with a contemporary philosophical intent: to reexamine a tumultuous contested epoch of philosophy’s past in order to reconsider its existing limitations and alternative possibilities. One dimension of this book is the investigation of constellations and entanglements of historical forces and concepts for the sake of articulating critical models and alternatives for the present.2 In the book, I contested the modern self-image of philosophy as exclusively and intrinsically Occidental by genealogically tracing how philosophy is already intercultural through a series of case studies focusing primarily on early twentieth-century German philosophy in its broader historical context. This critical genealogy of the intercultural conditions of the formation of modern philosophy is evidenced not only by considering “positive” influences and appropriations, as in Martin Buber, Martin Heidegger, or Georg Misch’s interpretation of Daoist sources such as the Zhuangzi 莊子 (chapters 4 and 5), but also in the constructions of the autonomy and purity of modern Western philosophy through its reactions against, and exclusion and subordi- nation of, its “non-Western” others (chapters 1, 5, and 6). The book does not represent a purely Western history or narrative insofar as I draw on a variety of argumentational and hermeneutical strategies from Chinese and other dis- courses to reverse and transform Western prejudices and perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Intercultural Philosophy a New Branch Or a New Orientation in Philosophy? Franz M
    Is Intercultural Philosophy a New Branch or a New Orientation in Philosophy? Franz M. Wimmer, Vienna* Summary: Probably every human culture has developed typical ways of philosophising in the sense that there were given explanations of the world, of what man is, and of the right relationships between human beings. Some of the cultures of the past have invented systems of writing and documentation, thereby establishing long lasting traditions of thought. Amidst a period of globalisation of many aspects of human life, the problem now arises, whether there will be one single form or method of philosophy in the future. If so: what then will be the role of the different traditions in shaping this future thinking? If not: must we give up the idea that philosophy ever can argue for universally acceptable truths or insights? This paper deals with some aspects of these questions by discussing the role of (Euro_)centrism in the historiography of philosophy, and by analysing the impact of the different languages of philosophy on thinking itself. Introductory remarks There are two important questions with respect to intercultural philosophy which this paper is not going to deal with: firstly, whether or not there are several culturally different origins of philosophy, and secondly, how understanding and communication is possible between such different philosophical cultures. Concerning the first question I take it for granted that contemporary philosophising is dependent on different cultural frameworks and that philosophy originated not only in Europe, but elsewhere as well;1 at least if we agree that philosophical questions concern mainly three objects: the structures of reality, knowledgability, and argumentations on norms and values - if, in other words, we consider ontology, epistemology, and ethics to be the central fields of research in philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Discourse, Critique, Emancipation and the Inclusion of the Other
    Intercultural Discourse, Critique, Emancipation and the Inclusion of the Other Fasil Merawi1 Abstract This paper critically engages contemporary discussions in intercultural philosophy and critical theory in light of achieving a profound critique of grand ideological schemes, propounding a model for an emancipatory praxis and the inclusion of the other in the dominant discourse. Intercultural philosophy tries to deconstruct the Eurocentrism of the philosophical tradition and in return introduces a reconstructive project centered on the embedded nature of cognition and the culturally oriented nature of philosophy. Critical social theory constitutes a critique of grand metaphysical systems that divorce theory from praxis and the transcendent from the transient. In return it tries to introduce an emancipatory praxis inspired by Hegelian-Marxism, is dialectical, reflexive, analyzes the contradictions of modernity and is interdisciplinary. Intercultural philosophy and critical social theory share a common interest in standing against grand metaphysical systems and centering on everyday centers of learning. Through such a critical exposition of the confines of intercultural philosophy and critical social theory, this paper argues that both approaches, (1) fail to go beyond the Eurocentric grand narrative of modernity that legitimizes Western ideology and is antithetical to the lived experiences of the other, (2) both approaches ultimately run into the problem of value incommensurability and (3) both approaches fail to introduce a quasi-transcendental
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Between Cultures Pragmatism, Rorty and Intercultural Philosophy* Pensando Entre Culturas Pragmatismo, Rorty Y La Filosofía Intercultural
    Thinking Between Cultures Pragmatism, Rorty and Intercultural Philosophy* Pensando entre culturas Pragmatismo, Rorty y la filosofía intercultural Lenart Škof** Univerza na Primorskem - Eslovenia Abstract The paper discusses Rorty’s critique and special relation to intercultural think- ing. It looks into the history of both pragmatism and intercultural philosophy, discusses some of their possible points of convergence, and finally follows the im- plications of this encounter for our intercultural understanding of Rorty’s version of pragmatism, especially in the context of a contemporary North-South intercul- tural dialogue. Keywords: Rorty, pragmatism, intercultural philosophy, comparative philosophy, Schopenhauer. Resumen Este artículo discute la crítica de Rorty y su relación especial con el pensamien- to intercultural. Se concentra en la historia tanto del pragmatismo como de la filosofía intercultural, analiza algunos de sus posibles puntos de convergencia y, fi- nalmente, examina las implicaciones de este encuentro para nuestra comprensión intercultural de la versión rortyana del pragmatismo, especialmente en el contexto de un diálogo intercultural contemporáneo entre el norte y el sur. Palabras clave: Rorty, pragmatismo, filosofía intercultural, filosofía comparativa, Schopenhauer. Introduction In June 2004, Richard Rorty delivered a lecture at the House of Artists in Tehran. Invited as he was by an Iranian philosopher Ramin Jahanbegloo, Rorty –from his neopragmatist and antifoun- dationalist position– spoke about the ideas of ‘post-democracy’ and ‘human rights’ culture’ (cf. Postel 2006; 2006b).1 In a ‘post- Artículo solicitado al autor * I thank Eduardo Mendieta for the comments on an earlier draft of this paper. ** [email protected] 1 Let me in this context also point to Ronald Dworkin’s lecture on human rights in Beijing (2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminaries— Philosophy and Language
    CHAPTER 1 Preliminaries— Philosophy and Language Do We Need a Universal Notion of Philosophy? Narrow and Broad Definitions of Philosophy For more than a century, there have been controversies as to whether it is justified to use the epithet “philosophy” with respect to non-Western traditions. Volume 2 of the Encyclopédie philosophique universelle (Uni- versal Philosophical Encyclopedia), published in 1991 with support of UNESCO, consists of three parts: (1) philosophie occidentale (Western Philosophy); (2) pensées asiatiques (Asian Thinking); (3) conceptualization des sociétés traditionnelles (Conceptualization of traditional societies).1 This UNESCO encyclopedia displays a typical Western mentality in reserving philosophy to “Western Philosophy.” Its choice of terminology contrasts with that in a range of handbooks, anthologies, and journals, where such terms as “Comparative Philosophy,” “World Philosophy,” or “Chinese Philosophy” appear in their titles.2 In doing so, parts of Asian thinking and other modes of non-Western thought are taken self- evidently to be philosophy.3 These two tendencies co-exist with such paradoxical phenomena: on the one hand, as yet it has been difficult for a department of philosophy in the West to include a required course of Asian or intercultural (or comparative) philosophy into a standard program of philosophy.4 There- fore, Ames (2005: 35) formulates the motivation for comparative philos- ophy as follows: “We are seeking to overcome the seemingly invincible prejudice prevailing within the academy that has precluded the inclusion of Chinese philosophy as philosophy, not merely as ‘thought.’” On the other hand, the idea and contents of Chinese, Indian, Japanese, African 14 © 2016 State University of New York Press, Albany PRELIMINARIES—PHILOSOPHY AND LANGUAGE 15 philosophy has often been taken for granted in such marginal fields as comparative philosophy and world philosophy, as well as in philosophy departments in non- Western countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Dialogue: in Search of Harmony in Diversity
    Intercultural Dialogue Intercultural Dialogue: In Search of Harmony in Diversity Edited by Edward Demenchonok Intercultural Dialogue: In Search of Harmony in Diversity, Edited by Edward Demenchonok This book first published 2014 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2014 by Edward Demenchonok and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-6362-9, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-6362-9 CONTENTS Foreword .................................................................................................... ix Edward Demenchonok Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Striving for Dialogue and Harmony in a Conflicted World Edward Demenchonok and Keping Wang Part I. Cultural Identity and Intercultural Dialogue as an Alternative to Homogenizing Globalization Chapter One ............................................................................................... 21 Bridging the Gaps: The Voices of Non-Western Philosophies in Global Polylogue Enrique Dussel Chapter Two .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Theory and Practice of Intercultural Philosophy
    On the Theory and Practice of Intercultural Philosophy von Hamid Reza Yousefi In the following I will discuss the structure, the topic and the tasks of intercultural philosophy which I would like to name a “science of peace”. It is subject to the polyhistorical dialogue and as a matter of principle declines feudal structures of communication. Two contra‐ dictory points of view are introduced in the context of the debate on the origin of philosophy: whereas the one tendency thinks of phi‐ losophy as “exclusively” Greek‐European and regards the rise of other sciences only connected to that the other tendency holds the opinion that philosophy is anyhow (“per se”) intercultural and therefore not “only” Greek, but “also” Greek. I plead for a theoreti‐ cal and practical process of decentralization and differentiation which amounts to conceive an “intercultural historiography of phi‐ losophy”. Hereby the intercultural philosophy does not present a new discipline besides the traditional philosophy; it rather aims at being its corrective and its elaboration. Accordingly, the analysis of social, political and communicative phenomena presents a central domain of the intercultural philosophy. It gives the formulations of questions and problems priority over philosophical traditions and aims at combining different thinking traditions each of them with their “own” formulations of questions and possible solutions as “equal” parts of discourse in order to start a polyhistorical dialogue at the same eye level. Introduction Intercultural philosophy, as a science of peace, is a thought‐ provoking occupation with both theoretical practical aspects based on dialogic principles and built on a foundation of empirical herme‐ neutic methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Pragmatism and Social Ethics: an Intercultural and Phenomenological Approach
    Contemporary Pragmatism Editions Rodopi Vol. 5, No. 1 (June 2008), 121–146 © 2008 Pragmatism and Social Ethics: An Intercultural and Phenomenological Approach Lenart Skof This article deals with some intercultural and phenomenological uses of pragmatist thought. In the first part, early methods of comparative philosophy are linked to James’s radical empiricism. The second part analyses Dewey’s social philosophy, interpreted from the inter- cultural perspective and linked to James’s philosophy. The third part argues for an enlargement of the uses of Deweyan social thought in the broader intercultural contexts. Finally, the phenomenology of breath is introduced and proposed as the basis for a new pragmatist social ethics of solidarity. A conception of human life and of its prospects has taken over the world. It is the most powerful religion of humanity today… At its extreme limit, it is the visionary conviction … that all men and women are bound together by an invisible circle of love. R. M. Unger1 1. From a methodological and epistemological point of view, perhaps one of the greatest imaginable differences existing within twentieth century philosophical thought is that between pragmatism and intercultural philosophy. Pragmatism is a distinctively American philosophy and an integral part of the Western philosophical (and scientific) tradition. Intercultural philosophy is a (relatively) new mode of thinking related to critical philosophical movements of the twentieth century. They appear to represent two opposite sides of philosophical discourse and worldview – pragmatism, an essentially (and historically) ‘ethnocentric’ philosophy of Western culture, and intercultural philosophy as its most natural adversary and rival.2 However, from the perspective of their practical results and importance for contemporary thought, a different story can be seen to emerge about pragmatism and intercultural philosophy – one pregnant with implicit as well as explicit interpretative possibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Philosophy and the Phenomenon of Migrating Texts and Traditions William Sweet1
    1 Intercultural Philosophy and the Phenomenon of Migrating Texts and Traditions William Sweet1 Recently, there has been much discussion of the relation of philosophy and culture and, particularly, of the bearing of culture on philosophy. For example, one finds today the thesis that philosophies emerge from their cultures, and can never stand independently of them. This thesis is, of course, by no means uncontroversial and it is not universally accepted, but it is nevertheless widely held. If this thesis is true, however, it raises a question – and that is about philosophy ‘across’ cultures. If philosophical traditions cannot be separated from the cultures in which they originate, can there be an ‘intercultural’ or ‘comparative’ philosophy? By ‘intercultural’ or ‘comparative’ philosophy, I do not mean to refer to a particular content or approach to philosophy, but simply the explicit activity of drawing on or engaging philosophies originating from outside one’s culture or traditions, in the process of carrying out one’s own philosophical work. It is not so much – as Paul Masson‐Oursel writes, concerning what he called “la philosophie comparée” – “the general examination of the ways in which human beings of all races and cultures reflect upon their actions and act upon their reflections.”2 “It is perhaps closer to what British and Indian philosophers in the early and mid 20th century, such as Alban Widgery, P.T. Raju, and – most famously – Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, described the view that there is “a common platform” from which philosophical
    [Show full text]