2020 Helicopter Larviciding
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Informe Asignaciones De Concesiones Del Espectro Radioeléctrico
Colección Informes de Transparencia Editor Secretaría de Participación, Transparencia y Anticorrupción El Salvador, 2019 Secretario Marcos Enrique Rodríguez González Subsecretaria Irma Lourdes Palacios Vásquez Revisión Fernando Marroquín Pavel Cruz Edición Clara Asunción Escamilla Equipo de contenidos Marcela Barahona Clara Asunción Escamilla José Luis Magaña Pavel Cruz Diagramación e Ilustración Diana Díaz Rebeca Espinoza Producción multimedia Nancy Cea Benjamín Castillo Forma recomendada de citar SPTA (2019). Asignaciones de concesiones del espectro radioeléctrico Secretaría de Participación, Transparencia y Anticorrupción Alameda Dr. Manuel Enrique Araujo, No. 5500, San Salvador, El Salvador, CA. www.spta.gob.sv Presentación Los procesos de privatización de los otros, en clara violación de los principios bienes y servicios estatales durante los de pluralidad de pensamiento que gobiernos previos a 2009, significaron deben de tener tanto la comunicación no sólo un detrimento en las finanzas como la democracia misma. públicas del país, sino también la continuación de procesos opacos para Las reformas a la Ley de la asignación de los mismos a manos Telecomunicaciones, ordenadas privadas que limitaron la participación a partir de una sentencia de de otros sectores en la administración inconstitucionalidad, si bien han de dichos bienes y servicios. Un ejemplo permitido mejorar los procesos y de esto ha sido la asignación de las procedimientos para la asignación frecuencias de radio y televisión en el de frecuencias, es claro que no espectro -
National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Final Integrated Activity Plan/Environmental Impact Statement Errata
United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Alaska State Office 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504 www.blrn .gov/alaska Dear Reader: The enclosed Errata Sheet documents minor corrections to the text of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan (TAP) that was publicly released on June 26. 2020. These corrections reflect errors that were discovered after the release of the Final EIS. We have utilized “tracked changes” (red text additions and green text crossed-out deletions) for the changes where we felt it would assist the reader to more easily identify the corrections. There are no changes or significant new circumstances or information identified in this Errata Sheet that affect the impact conclusions in the final EIS. In the Final EIS, an error was identified in Table 2-1 for the acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E. Correcting this error required updates throughout the text of the EIS wherever acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E was referenced. These changes are denoted with an asterisk (*) in the errata sheet. This Errata Sheet is part of the administrative record for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska lAP Final EIS. These corrections will be posted on the BLM-Alaska website at www.blm.gov/alaska. For additional information or clarification regarding the attached Errata Sheet, please contact Stephanie Rice, Project Lead, at (907) 271-3202. Chad B. Padge t State Director Attachment: Errata Sheet ATTACHMENT: ERRATA SHEET In the Final EIS, an error was identified in Table 2-1 for the acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E. -
2. La Televisión
37 2. La Televisión 2.1. Introducción a la Televisión La televisión es una experiencia icónica, artificial, técnicamente producida, de acontecimientos y objetos cambiantes registrados mediante la cinematografía, expresados en forma puntual por rayos eléctricos de acuerdo con su intensidad luminosa difundida por transmisiones inalámbricas. La television crea la ilusión de movimiento al presentar ante el ojo una rápida sucesión de imágenes.16 La televisión es la transmisión y recepción a distancia de imágenes en movimiento. Es el fenómeno fotoeléctrico el que permite transformar las radiaciones luminosas en corriente eléctrica. Esto hace possible la codificación y transporte de la señal hasta un receptor que descodifique y transforme la corriente eléctrica en imagen visible. Descripción básica del Sistema Televisivo 17 16 y 17. José Martínez Abadía, Introducción a la tecnología audiovisual. Televisión, video, radio, Barcelona, España. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S.A., 1997, Págs.34-35. 2.2. Antecedentes históricos de la Televisión. (Línea de Tiempo) 38 1884: Paul Gottlieb Nipkow, ingeniero alemán, inventó el disco de superficie plana o disco Nipkow.18 Éste consistía en un disco de superficie plana con una base más larga que su altura, que a su vez se enroscaba en forma cilíndrica con un eje circuncéntrico a los lados. Elaboraba un giro del disco sobre su propio centro que hacía que la misma figura cobrara movimiento. 1877: Philo Farnsworth, ingeniero de radio El funcionario inglés, George Carey, estadounidense, inventó el iconoscopio presentó bosquejos de la cámara de y el tubo disector de imágenes. Con selenio que permitiría a las personas esto se lograba una mejor repro- “ ver por electricidad” . -
D Classification Review in Seven Locations Across Io
Alaska LANDFIRE Application Project: Map and Classification Review in Seven Locations across Alaska Tina Boucher, Keith Boggs Lindsey Flagstad, Mike Duffy Alaska Natural Heritage Program CAS, University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street, Anchorage, AK 99515 907-257-2784 [email protected] 1 4°¢¨• ض #ØÆ¥•Æ¥≥ aa!wò hC CLb5LbD{ LbÇwh5Ü/ÇLhb a9ÇIh5{!//Üw!/ò !{{9{a9bÇ {ÇÜ5ò !w9! a9ÇIh5{ a9ÇIh5{v Ü![LÇ!ÇLë9 w9ëL9í {ÇÜ5ò !w9! a9ÇIh5{ w9{Ü[Ç{!//Üw!/ò !{{9{{a9bÇ{ 59b![L 9ëÇ a!t 59b![L t[hÇ !{{LDba9bÇ Çh 9/h[hDL/![ {ò{Ç9a 59b![L /[!{{LCL/!ÇLhb !bL!Y/I!Y 9ëÇ a!t !bL!Y/I!Y t[hÇ !{{LDba9bÇ Çh 9/h[hDL/![ {ò{Ç9a !bL!Y/I!Y /[!{{LCL/!ÇLhb w9{Ü[Ç{v Ü![LÇ!ÇLë9 w9ëL9í òÜYhb!/I!w[9ò b!ÇLhb![ t!wY Y9b!L CWhw5{ b!ÇLhb![ t!wY D[!/L9w .!ò b!ÇLhb![ t!wY D!Ç9{ hC ÇI9 !w/ÇL/ b!ÇLhb![ t!wY íw!bD9[[!{!LbÇ 9[L!{ b!ÇLhb![ t!wY w9/haa9b5!ÇLhb{ !/Ybhí[95D9a9bÇ{ $ w9C9w9b/9{ $ !tt9b5Ló 9wwhw a!ÇwL/9{ !bL!Y/I!Y 9wwhw a!ÇwLó 59b![L 9wwhw a!ÇwLó !tt9b5Ló íw!bD9[[!{Ç 9[L!{ 59Ç!L[95 {/w99b {IhÇ{ !b5 Ç9óÇ 2 aa!wò hC CLb5LbD{ We conducted accuracy assessments for two national park units (the north side of Denali National Park and Aniakchak National Monument) and qualitative assessments in five additional areas representing the major ecological zones across the state including boreal, boreal transition, maritime, arctic, and Aleutian. In each assessment we reviewed the Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) Map and the ecological system classification. -
Final 2012 Monitoring and Evaluation Report Full Document
United States Department Tongass National Forest of Agriculture Forest Service 2012 Annual & Five Year Monitoring and Alaska Region Evaluation Report R10-MB-757 July 2013 Monitoring Overview INSIDE THIS The 2012 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation The monitoring report can be found on the Tongass web REPORT Report summarizes specific monitoring site under Projects and Plans. A full reference report for completed during fiscal year 2012 in ac- each question is available by hyperlink. cordance with the Tongass Land and Re- If you have questions or comments about this report, source Management Plan (Forest Plan). please contact Carol Seitz-Warmuth at the Ketchikan Physical & Biologi- 2–20 Chapter 6 of the Forest Plan specifies an Forest Supervisor’s Office, 907-228-6341. cal Environment annual written summary of forest wide mon- itoring programs. As a result of the 2008 Forest Plan Amend- Human Uses and 20–28 ment, some monitoring protocols and ques- Land Manage- tions were updated to better ment define and focus the monitoring work. This report serves as both Economic and 29 the annual written summary of Social Environ- forest wide monitoring programs, and also the five year review of ment all monitoring done since the Forest Plan Amendment. The five year review is a compre- hensive description of results for each monitoring question, and an evaluation of the last five years of data. Monitoring efforts are currently underway for most of the ques- tions in this report. In some cases, monitoring protocols are still being developed or under review. Monitoring and Evaluation Program Monitoring and evaluation is a ment of plans and budgets, or gathered during the year and quality control process for im- both, to facilitate feasible and identification of issues requiring plementation of the Tongass meaningful action on the immediate attention, while a Forest Plan. -
Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong Juneau, Alaska 2019
Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong Juneau, Alaska 2019 Preface Southeast Alaska's rainforests, peatlands and alpine habitats support a wide variety of plant life. The composition of this vegetation is strongly influenced by surrounding biogeographical factors. For example, the ranges of some Asian plant species extend into Southeast Alaska by way of the Aleutian Islands; other species extend northward into this region along the Pacific coast or southward from central Alaska. Included in Southeast Alaska's vegetation are at least 27 native orchid species and varieties whose collective ranges extend from Mexico north to beyond the Arctic Circle, and from North America to northern Europe and Asia. These orchids survive in a delicate ecological balance, requiring specific insect pollinators for seed production, and mycorrhizal fungi that provide nutrients essential for seedling growth and survival of adult plants. These complex relationships can lead to vulnerability to human impacts. Orchids also tend to transplant poorly and typically perish without their fungal partners. They are best left to survive as important components of biodiversity as well as resources for our enjoyment. Our goal is to provide a useful description of Southeast Alaska's native orchids for readers who share enthusiasm for the natural environment and desire to learn more about our native orchids. This book addresses each of the native orchids found in the area of southeast Alaska extending from Yakutat and the Yukon border south to Ketchikan and the British Columbia border. For each species, we include a brief description of its distribution, habitat, size, mode of reproduction, and pollination biology. -
Multiple Documents
Alex Morgan et al v. United States Soccer Federation, Inc., Docket No. 2_19-cv-01717 (C.D. Cal. Mar 08, 2019), Court Docket Multiple Documents Part Description 1 3 pages 2 Memorandum Defendant's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of i 3 Exhibit Defendant's Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of La 4 Declaration Gulati Declaration 5 Exhibit 1 to Gulati Declaration - Britanica World Cup 6 Exhibit 2 - to Gulati Declaration - 2010 MWC Television Audience Report 7 Exhibit 3 to Gulati Declaration - 2014 MWC Television Audience Report Alex Morgan et al v. United States Soccer Federation, Inc., Docket No. 2_19-cv-01717 (C.D. Cal. Mar 08, 2019), Court Docket 8 Exhibit 4 to Gulati Declaration - 2018 MWC Television Audience Report 9 Exhibit 5 to Gulati Declaration - 2011 WWC TElevision Audience Report 10 Exhibit 6 to Gulati Declaration - 2015 WWC Television Audience Report 11 Exhibit 7 to Gulati Declaration - 2019 WWC Television Audience Report 12 Exhibit 8 to Gulati Declaration - 2010 Prize Money Memorandum 13 Exhibit 9 to Gulati Declaration - 2011 Prize Money Memorandum 14 Exhibit 10 to Gulati Declaration - 2014 Prize Money Memorandum 15 Exhibit 11 to Gulati Declaration - 2015 Prize Money Memorandum 16 Exhibit 12 to Gulati Declaration - 2019 Prize Money Memorandum 17 Exhibit 13 to Gulati Declaration - 3-19-13 MOU 18 Exhibit 14 to Gulati Declaration - 11-1-12 WNTPA Proposal 19 Exhibit 15 to Gulati Declaration - 12-4-12 Gleason Email Financial Proposal 20 Exhibit 15a to Gulati Declaration - 12-3-12 USSF Proposed financial Terms 21 Exhibit 16 to Gulati Declaration - Gleason 2005-2011 Revenue 22 Declaration Tom King Declaration 23 Exhibit 1 to King Declaration - Men's CBA 24 Exhibit 2 to King Declaration - Stolzenbach to Levinstein Email 25 Exhibit 3 to King Declaration - 2005 WNT CBA Alex Morgan et al v. -
Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13Th) Edition
Distances Between United States Ports 2019 (13th) Edition T OF EN CO M M T M R E A R P C E E D U N A I C T I E R D E S M T A ATES OF U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) RDML Timothy Gallaudet., Ph.D., USN Ret., Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management Cover image courtesy of Megan Greenaway—Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI III Preface Distances Between United States Ports is published by the Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), pursuant to the Act of 6 August 1947 (33 U.S.C. 883a and b), and the Act of 22 October 1968 (44 U.S.C. 1310). Distances Between United States Ports contains distances from a port of the United States to other ports in the United States, and from a port in the Great Lakes in the United States to Canadian ports in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Distances Between Ports, Publication 151, is published by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and distributed by NOS. NGA Pub. 151 is international in scope and lists distances from foreign port to foreign port and from foreign port to major U.S. ports. The two publications, Distances Between United States Ports and Distances Between Ports, complement each other. -
Television Digital Y Ambiente Multimedia Madiante Redes
INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL ESCUELA SUPERIOR DE INGENIERÍA MECANICA Y ELÉCTRICA “TELEVISION DIGITAL Y AMBIENTE MULTIMEDIA VIA SATELITAL” TESIS QUE PARA OBTENER EL TÍTULO DE INGENIERO EN COMUNICACIONES Y ELECTRÓNICA PRESENTA PEDRO DAVID RIVERA JUÁREZ ASESORES ING. FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ RANGEL M. EN C. CLAUDIA HERNÁNDEZ AGUILAR MÉXICO, D.F. MAYO DE 2014 TELEVISION DIGITAL Y AMBIENTE MULTIMEDIA VIA SATELITAL 2 INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL ESIME Zacatenco TELEVISION DIGITAL Y AMBIENTE MULTIMEDIA VIA SATELITAL I N D I C E I N D I C E _______________________________________________________________ 3 O B J E T I V O ____________________________________________________________ 5 I N T R O D U C C I O N ____________________________________________________ 5 CAPITULO I: “T E L E V I S I Ó N D I G I T A L” _____________________________ 9 1.1.- Antecedentes Históricos de la Televisión: _______________________________________9 1.1.1.- Antecedentes Históricos de la Televisión en México: ___________________________________ 11 1.2.-Televisión Digital de Alta Definición: __________________________________________ 13 1.2.1.- Detalles Técnicos: ______________________________________________________________ 15 1.2.2.- Formatos de Compresión: ________________________________________________________ 18 1.2.3.- Tipos de compresión: ___________________________________________________________ 18 1.3.- Diferencia entre Televisión Analógica y Televisión Digital: _______________________ 20 1.4.- Ventajas de la Transmisión de HDTV frente SDTV: _____________________________ -
Estudio De Las Características Que Posee La Televisión Digital Terrestre Que Permita Mejorar El Servicio Actual De La Televisión En Nicaragua
UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE INGENIERIA UNI-MANAGUA FACULTAD DE ELECTROTECNIA Y COMPUTACION CARRERA ING.EN TELECOMUNICACIONES Trabajo Investigativo De Tesis Monografica Para Optar al Titulo de Ingeniero en Telecomunicaciones TEMA: Estudio de las Características que Posee la Televisión Digital Terrestre que Permita Mejorar el Servicio Actual de la Televisión en Nicaragua. AUTORES: Br. Néstor José Guerrero Hernández Br. Wendy Anielka Guerrero Hernández TUTOR: Ing. Edwin Ramón Lacayo Managua 23 de Octubre 2013 Página 1 Contenido RESUMEN ......................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCCION .............................................................................................................................. 6 TEMA .................................................................................................................................................. 7 OBJETIVO GENERAL: .................................................................................................................... 8 OBJETIVOS ESPECÍFICOS: ......................................................................................................... 8 PREGUNTAS DIRECTRICES ........................................................................................................ 9 JUSTIFICACION ............................................................................................................................. 10 ANTECEDENTES ......................................................................................................................... -
Long Island Tidal Wetlands Trends Analysis
LONG ISLAND TIDAL WETLANDS TRENDS ANALYSIS Prepared for the NEW ENGLAND INTERSTATE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION Prepared by August 2015 Long Island Tidal Wetlands Trends Analysis August 2015 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................... 6 FUNDING SOURCE AND PARTNERS ..................................................................................................................................... 6 TRENDS ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................................. 7 METHODOLOGY AND DATA ................................................................................................................................... 9 OUTLINE OF TECHNICAL APPROACH ................................................................................................................................... 9 TECHNICAL OBJECTIVES -
Alternative Methods’ of Carrying out the Undertaking
Draft Environmental Assessment Lakeview Waterfront Connection 5.0 DESCRIPTION, EVALUATION AND RATIONALE FOR ‘ALTERNATIVE METHODS’ OF CARRYING OUT THE UNDERTAKING ‘Alternative Methods’ are different ways of doing the same activity. In the context of the LWC Project, ‘Alternative Methods’ are similar ways of designing a new natural waterfront park on created land with ecological habitat and public linkages within the LWC Project Study Area. For the purpose of the EA, different ‘Alternative Methods’ were identified by modelling different fill volumes and alternative shoreline treatments in relation to the coastal processes that will ultimately dictate their configuration. The initial identification of ‘Alternative Methods’ considered the amount of fill required to establish a footprint upon which other LWC Project objectives could be achieved. Different combinations of hard and soft shorelines (i.e. revetment vs. beach) and the incorporation of different fill volumes produced a series of alternative footprints upon which the various LWC Project objectives could be achieved. LWC Project objectives were addressed as subsequent layers applied to the alternative footprints. The identification and evaluation of ‘Alternative Methods’ was carried out in a four-step process depicted in Figure 5.1. 5.1 STEP 1: DETERMINE FOOTPRINT FOR ALTERNATIVES The first step in defining the Alternative LWC Project Configurations was to develop a range of footprints12 up to a maximum spatial extent. This range of footprints was determined through consideration of coastal processes, effects on water quality and the economical use of fill. The LWC Project footprint can be affected by and/or can affect coastal processes to the detriment of the broader LWC Regional Study Area or to the detriment of the LWC Project footprint itself.