An Early Seventeenth-Century River Environment: the 1618 Survey of the Itchen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Early Seventeenth-Century River Environment: the 1618 Survey of the Itchen Proc. Hampshire Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 72, 2017, 142–165 (Hampshire Studies 2017) https://doi.org/10.24202/hs2017001 AN EARLY SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY RIVER ENVIRONMENT: THE 1618 SURVEY OF THE ITCHEN By JOHN LANGDON† and JAMES WHITE ABSTRACT in having an accompanying map, produced by John More (or Moore) sometime over 1618–19 In 1618, a survey was made of the river Itchen and following the written survey’s appearance in the barriers that existed to its navigation: the mills, early 1618 (Figs 2–4). Altogether, in addition to dams and weirs, the bridges, the overhanging trees providing an exceptional description of a river and collapsed riverbanks. It provides a contemporary environment of the time, as we shall demon- view of the state of the river. The survey was part strate, it also helps to illuminate the evolution of a longstanding struggle to open river navigation of the river’s environment for decades and between Winchester and Southampton, seen as eco- arguably centuries before. nomically beneficial by the inhabitants of the former Certainly the state of the river that the survey city. Some of the barriers were described as recent and and map together describe in 1618 was not reflect the changing developments of the previous amenable for such activities as navigation, being century, the destruction of mills by Henry VIII in the dominated by a number of obstructions that 1530s, the secularisation of lands belonging to the would have rendered passage by boats virtually bishop of Winchester, and the subsequent rebuilding impossible. This alone would have been bad of some of the mills. This article incorporates the full enough, but the obstacles also likely impeded text of the survey and an introduction and discus- the movement of migratory fish, especially sion of the wider issues. salmon, as well as reducing the amount of land available for agricultural purposes in the river valley. HISTORICAL CONTEXT Comprising one of the most important categories of these barriers were clearly the The purpose of this article is to provide a mod- mills and accompanying weirs or dams strung ern-English translation of a document with an out along this stretch of river from Winches- exceptionally detailed description of a river ter to Southampton Water. There were at environment from almost four centuries ago, least six according to the numerical summary that is, a survey of the 10½ -mile stretch along of ‘impediments’ at the end of the survey the Itchen River from Woodmill in the parish of (fol. 14v), but also at least four more were Bitterne, now a northern suburb of Southamp- mentioned or indicated in the survey and/or ton, to that part of the river opposite the East map, making a total of ten drawing upon the Gate of Winchester (Fig. 1).1 Its purpose was to river’s water resources.4 Even if such mills did establish – or re-establish?2 – a navigation from not comprise a direct block on the river, but Southampton to Winchester, while respecting instead drew water from the river by means of a the rights of riparian landholders, especially long mill-leat, as at Shawford Mill (Fig. 3), they those who operated or leased mills along this nonetheless significantly affected overall water stretch of the river. It is not exceptional, since flow. On at least two points along the river – at least one other similar survey is known for first, when water was drawn off separately for around 1675–6, concerning the Hampshire/ Shawford and Twyford Mills, and, second, Wiltshire Avon from Christchurch to Salisbury.3 further downstream for Barton Peverill and The Itchen survey, however, is probably unique ‘Stoke’ (Bishopstoke) Mills (Fig. 4) – the 142 LANGDON & WHITE: AN EARLY 17TH-CENTURY RIVER ENVIRONMENT: THE 1618 SURVEY OF THE ITCHEN 143 Fig. 1 Map of river Itchen showing the stretch covered by the survey, from Woodmill (Bitterne) to Winchester river’s flow, for a short distance at least, was be restricting easy passage of boats in particular. effectively divided into three parts. In each of Eight ‘bridges’, presumably for vehicles and/ these cases two of the channels powered mills or pack-animals, and a further four footbridges, and whatever water flow remained dumped were seen as problematic in the 1618 Itchen into the old channel of the river, described in survey. The most common negative characteri- the survey as the ‘ancient’ or ‘main’ course.5 zation of these bridges was that they were ‘low’ This implicit priority for mills rendered any or, in one case, ‘very low’.7 Here the contrast with channel for navigation (or fish) much more the c.1675–6 Hampshire/Wiltshire Avon survey prone to the vagaries of weather, particularly is instructive, where the main concern about during the summer when water flow was tradi- bridges in this later case was for the narrowness tionally at a low point.6 of arches,8 where the lowness of the bridge was The perceived obstructions did not stop at only mentioned once.9 This might suggest that mills. Bridges crossing the river were also felt to the Itchen bridges were relatively rudimentary 144 HAMPSHIRE FIELD CLUB AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY in 1618, perhaps even of flat, timber construc- the third was categorized, along with other tion from bank to bank without arches, which matters concerning the river at this point, as would have had their road-beds closer to the a ‘nuisance’. water surface, creating greater trouble for The implication is that this new weir, dam, navigators. There were also two mentions of etc., construction was relatively recent, but boundary rails (fols 13v, 14r), which were also there is a larger story to tell here, going back clear blockages for boats, although they would at least eighty years. Certainly in the case of have been easy enough to clear. Woodmill, and very plausibly in the case of the What was probably much more pernicious dam directing water to the St Cross mill (Fig. to navigation, as described in 1618 survey, 2) and the erecting of part of ‘Seagrove’ Mill was the generally slovenly state of the river. hard by Winchester, the new constructions Two very obvious signs of this decrepitude were in fact reconstructions following demoli- were the ‘weir athwart the said main river now tion in the late 1530s. This was connected to somewhat decayed’ on the lands of Sir John the legislation known as the ‘Statute of Sewers’, Seymour near Otterbourne (fol. 13v) and the enacted in 1532.13 A memorandum of Thomas ‘diverse stakes’ standing near the low bridge at Cromwell, Henry VIII’s chief minister at the Bishopstoke (fol. 13r), the latter possibly being time, catches its spirit: ‘An Act that never stakes upon which to array fishing nets or weir nor water-mill shall hereafter be erected stray piles from a pre-existing weir (see more or made within this realm.’14 This mood was on this below). Even more importantly, there riding the wave of generally frustrated legisla- were over twenty references to sunken banks tive activity about river blockages, going back and over thirty-five to trees and bush overhang- all the way to Magna Carta.15 ing the stream,10 obvious hindrances for the Nor was it the usual, soon-to-be-disillusioned towpaths that would be an essential feature bluster about such river obstructions. Both of later navigation on the river.11 Taking this Henry VIII and his chief minister at the time, together with the problematic weirs (either in Thomas Cromwell, were particularly deter- operation or decayed), bridges and boundary mined to see the legislation carried through rails, this provided a trenchant indictment con- to its intended conclusion across the entire cerning the neglect of the river for virtually any kingdom. In addition to the firmness indicated economic purpose other than milling. in Cromwell’s memorandum, the king himself Some of the more recent history of the river, was resolved to lead by example, allegedly however, is tellingly revealed in the survey’s suffering a loss of over 500 marks (£366 13s. pages. Three comments from it are particularly 4d.) income per year through the uprooting of noteworthy. When discussing Woodmill the royal weirs and mills by late 1535.16 survey remarks that its two ‘great’ weirs were The total impact of this legislation through- blocking the navigation between Southamp- out the kingdom is still to be determined, but ton and Winchester. Significantly the survey demolition of mills, weirs, arrays of fishing nets goes on to say in its original English that these and the like in various river systems in England weirs ‘are not very auntient’ (fol. 12r), with the were carried out over a reasonably lengthy implication that the blockage of the river by period from 1535 to 1539.17 Hampshire was them was relatively recent. Similarly, there is a certainly an early target. After a two- to three- reference to ‘one baye [that is, a dam] w[ith] year hiatus after the legislation’s creation, likely Pyles newly made a little above S[t] Crosses the time it took to set up the various commis- [sic] athwart the said maine River tor[n]inge sions,18 a letter patent designating those sitting the whole course of the same River out of his on the commission of sewers for Hampshire anciente course towards S[t] Crosse Mill’ (fol. was issued on 28 January, 1535.19 The actual 14r) (Fig. 2). Finally, there was a reference to demolitions seemingly started in middle or late part of ‘Seagrove’12 Mill (near to the East Gate 1535, with the king himself allegedly directing of Winchester) being ‘lately erected’ (fol.
Recommended publications
  • Hamble River Logboat: Report on Recent Investigation by HWTMA
    Hamble River Logboat: Report on Recent Investigation by HWTMA Hampshire and Wight Trust for Maritime Archaeology September 2010 Hamble River Logboat Study Report Contents I. DOCUMENT CONTROL ........................................................................................................... 1 II. LIST OF FIGURES & TABLES .................................................................................................. 1 III. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS......................................................................................................... 2 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 PROJECT AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................ 2 1.2 THE RIVER HAMBLE ........................................................................................................... 2 1.3 HISTORY OF THE HAMBLE LOGBOAT ................................................................................... 2 1.4 THE HAMBLE LOGBOAT TODAY............................................................................................ 5 2. INVESTIGATION OF THE HAMBLE LOGBOAT................................................................. 6 2.1 DENDRO-CHRONOLOGY (BY NIGEL NAYLING)...................................................................... 6 3. ANALYSIS OF THE HAMBLE LOGBOAT........................................................................... 7 3.1 CONTEXT .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02
    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
    [Show full text]
  • John Keble's Parishes a History of Hursley and Otterbourne
    John Keble's Parishes: A History Of Hursley And Otterbourne By Charlotte M. Yonge John Keble's Parishes: A History Of Hursley And Otterbourne CHAPTER I - MERDON AND OTTERBOURNE The South Downs of England descend at about eight miles from the sea into beds of clay, diversified by gravel and sand, and with an upper deposit of peaty, boggy soil, all having been brought down by the rivers of which the Itchen and the Test remain. On the western side of the Itchen, exactly at the border where the chalk gives way to the other deposits, lies the ground of which this memoir attempts to speak. It is uneven ground, varied by undulations, with gravelly hills, rising above valleys filled with clay, and both alike favourable to the growth of woods. Fossils of belemnite, cockles (cardium), and lamp-shells (terebratula) have been found in the chalk, and numerous echini, with the pentagon star on their base, are picked up in the gravels and called by the country people Shepherds’ Crowns - or even fossil toads. Large boulder stones are also scattered about the country, exercising the minds of some observers, who saw in certain of them Druidical altars, with channels for the flow of the blood, while others discerned in these same grooves the scraping of the ice that brought them down in the Glacial age. But we must pass the time when the zoophytes were at work on our chalk, when the lamp-shells rode at anchor on shallow waves, when the cockles sat “at their doors in a rainbow frill,” and the belemnites spread their cuttlefish arms to the sea, and darkened the water for their enemies with their store of ink.
    [Show full text]
  • Segar Stream River Itchen
    Segar Stream River Itchen An advisory visit carried out by the Wild Trout Trust – January 2011 1 1. Introduction This report is the output of a Wild Trout Trust advisory visit undertaken on the Segar Stream which is a carrier of the River Itchen in Hampshire. The advisory visit was undertaken at the request of the Portsmouth Services Fly Fishing Club which has been invited to lease the fishing rights. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with Robin Bray, Anthony Kennett and Mark Kerr from the fishing club. Throughout the report, normal convention is followed with respect to bank identification i.e. banks are designated Left Bank (LB) or Right Bank (RB) whilst looking downstream. 2. Catchment overview The River Itchen is considered to be one of the finest examples of a chalk river in Europe and one of the most famous brown trout (Salmo trutta) fisheries in the world. The river is designated as Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) (Appendix 1). The Itchen rises from the chalk aquifer to the east of Winchester where groundwater fed springs feed into three headwater streams; the Alre, the Candover and the Tichbourne, or Cheriton Stream. The streams converge near Alresford and flow south west, through the centre of Winchester and on to join the sea in Southampton. The river is characterised by a plethora of man-made channels, some dug to provide milling power, some to support the old Itchen Navigation canal and others to feed the network of water meadow carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamble-Le- Rice Parish Council AGENDA
    Hamble-le- Rice Parish Council Memorial Hall, High Street, Hamble-le-Rice, Southampton SO31 4JE 02380453422 [email protected] A meeting of the Parish Council will be held on Monday 13 March 2017 at Roy Underdown Pavilion, Baron Road, Hamble-le-Rice at 7.00pm. AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. Declaration of interest and approved dispensations 3. To approve minutes of the Full Council Meeting 27th February 2017 4. Public session Community and Partnership 5. Presentation on the new Community facility at the former Barclays Bank by Matt Blyth, Eastleigh Borough Council. 6. Planning applications F/17/79951 Single storey rear extension, first floor terrace, raised patio to rear DEL and alterations to elevation 14 Oakwood Way, Hamble-Le-Rice, Southampton, SO31 4HJ F/17/80052 Two storey side extension, single storey rear extension, conversion DEL of roof space to provide habitable accommodation and alterations to fenestration 2 Emmons Close, Hamble-Le-Rice, Southampton, SO31 4QF C/17/80102 Erection of 1.5m high wall to site entrance DEL 16 Crowsport, Hamble-Le-Rice, Southampton, SO31 4HG T/17/80104 Fell 1no. Beech, 1no. Holm Oak and 1no. Lawson Cypress to rear DEL 6 Copse Lane, Hamble-Le-Rice, Southampton, SO31 4QH 7. Playing Pitch strategy – Response Finance 8. Audit report(s) – reports attached 9. Annual review of Financial Regulations – report attached 10. Refunds policy - verbal report 11. Member training – verbal update 12. Budget monitoring – report attached Update reports on: 13. 26/52/16 Coronation Parade Improvements 14. 52/2/15 Hamble Lifeboat toilets 15. 477/111/16 CPF Storage Building Project 16.
    [Show full text]
  • W-Orthies of England (Vol I, P
    , ~ ·........ ; - --~":.!.::- SIR HECTOR LIVL,GSTOX Dt:'FF, K.B.E., C.::\I.G. THE SEWELLS IN THE NEW WORLD. BY SIR HECTOR L. DUFF, K.B.E., C.M.G. EXETER: WM. POLLARD & Co. LTD., BAMPFYLDE STREET. CONTENTS. PACE: PREFACE .. 0HAPTER !.-WILLIAM SEWELL THE FOUNDER AND HIS SON, HENRY SEWELL THE FIRST, circa 1500- 1628 .. .. .. :r CHAPTER 11.-HENRY SEWELL THE SECOND AND THIRD, AND THEIR :MIGRAnoNTOTHE NEW WoRLD, 1576-1700 - .. .. 13 0HAPTER 111.-MAJOR STEPHEN SEWELL; ms BROTHER· SAMUEL, CHIEF JUSTICE OF MAssACHUSETTS, AND THE TRAGEDY OF SALEM, 1652-1725 .. 25 CHAPTER IV.-JoNATHAN SEWELL THE FIRST AND SECOND, AND THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPEN· DENCE, I692-I796 .. • 4:r CHAPTER V.-JONATHAN SEWELL THE THIRD: THE GREAT CHIEF JUSTICE, 1766-t839 - - - 56 CHAPTER VI.-WILLIAM SEWELL, THE SHERIFF, AND HIS DESCENDANTS - .. 82 CHAPTER VIL-THE HERALDRY OF SEWELL .. .. 97 CHAPTER VIII.-THE HOUSE OF LIVINGSTON - 106 LIST OF ILLUSTR.,\TIONS. PORTRAIT OF THE AUTHOR - frontispiece CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON. JONATHAN SEWELL, LL.D. - - to face page Bo ALICE SEW~LL, LADY RUSSELL ,, ,, 94 ARMS BORNE BY THE SEWELLS OF NEW ENGLAND (text) - page 98 SEWELL QUARTERING AS GRANTED BY THE HERALDS) COLLEGE (text) 102 " ARMS OF DUFF OF CLYDEBANK, WITH BADGE SHOWING THE ARMORIAL DEVICES OF SEWELL AND LIVINGSTON ,, 104 PREFACE. This memoir does not profess to be, in any sense, a comprehensive history of the family to which it relates. It aims simply at recording my mother's lineal ancestry as far back as it can be traced with absolute certainty­ that is from the 4ays of Henry VII to our time-and at giving some account, though only in the barest outline, of those among her direct forbears whose lives have been specially distinguished or eventful.
    [Show full text]
  • Saxon Charters and Landscape Evolution in the South-Central Hampshire Basin
    ProcHampsh Field Club ArchaeolSoc 50, 1994, 103-25 SAXON CHARTERS AND LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION IN THE SOUTH-CENTRAL HAMPSHIRE BASIN By CHRISTOPHER K CURRIE ABSTRACT THE CHARTER EVIDENCE Landscape study of the South Central Hampshire Basin north of Methodology Southampton has identified evidence for organised land use, based on diverse agricultural, pastoral and woodland land uses in the The methods used to eludicate the bounds of the Saxon period. Combined study of the topographic, cartographiccharter s discussed below are based on a long­ and charter evidence has revealed that the basis for settlement standing knowledge of the areas under patterns had largely developed by the tenth century. Highly consideration. This was combined with organised common pasturing is identified within gated areas as topographical information given on the earliest being the origin of English commons in the later historic period.Ordnanc e Survey map (one inch, 1810 edition, Evidence for possible river engineering is discussed. sheet XI), particularly with regard to the parish Charter evidence suggests that this developed landscape, boundaries shown thereon. In some cases this was underwent reorganisation in the Late Saxon period, with ecclesiastical bodies at Winchester being the major beneficiaries.supporte d by knowledge of earlier documents. It Although dealing with a small geographical area, this study is accepted that much of the boundaries of these raises implications for the nation-wide study of the origin of estates will be conjectural. Where the boundary land-use traditions and settlement in England. appears to follow close to the earliest known parish boundary, it has been assumed this is the course of die charter bounds, unless there is good INTRODUCTION reason to think otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbots Worthy Fishery River Itchen, Hampshire
    Abbots Worthy Fishery River Itchen, Hampshire Abbots Worthy Fishery River Itchen, Hampshire Winchester 3 miles (London Waterloo 57 mins), Alresford 6 miles and Stockbridge 10 miles. Syndicate membership for the Abbots Worthy beat on the Itchen Introduction The River Itchen is considered to be one of the finest English chalk streams by anglers worldwide. Rising from the Hampshire chalk downland near New Cheriton, the river has a reported catchment area of 280 miles from its source where it is known as the Titchbourne Stream. The river is approximately 28 miles long and flows north to New Alresford where it is joined by two spring fed streams, the Erle and the Candover Brook, becoming the River Itchen flowing west past Ovington and Itchen Abbot, east to Abbots Worthy and south to Winchester and Southampton where the river becomes tidal and joins the reaches of the River Test on Southampton Water. The river is highly sought after for its quality of water and fly fishing and almost completely wild trout population. Situation The Abbots Worthy beat on the Upper Itchen is located on the edge of the village of Abbots Worthy approximately 3 miles to the north of the cathedral city of Winchester. Within Abbots Worthy and the adjacent Kings Worthy there are everyday conveniences including shops, post office and public house. Winchester provides a comprehensive range of shops, cultural and recreational facilities and a wide choice of restaurants and wine bars. Travel and communications are excellent with the A33, A34 and M3 adjacent giving access to both London and the south coast, Oxford, the north and the A303 for the west country.
    [Show full text]
  • OV5 Iustory of R
    OV5 iUSTORY OF r StettetyA, & 'Ditfnict Aocal Society PREFACE This paper has been written with the intention of setting down basic facts in the history of Eastleigh as they are known, and of drawing attention to the vast amount of detail still needing to be discovered and recorded. The very name of Eastleigh has its history and, together with all the other place-names in our modem Borough, a long one, with variations in spelling, popularity and expanse of land indicated by the name. Research already carried out by members of the Eastleigh and District Local History Society has been published in a series of Occasional and Special Papers. Reference to these and other publications is made in the text so that more detailed information may be obtained when needed. The reader is encouraged to set himself in the right mood by making sure that he knows the history of his own patch. Who built the house? Why was it so designed? What materials were used and where did they come from? Why was the road so named? What is the nature of the garden soil and how was it composed? Find out the answers to these and other questions and, above all, remember that today’s events are tomorrow’s history. This may inspire you to seek further information or advice and, possibly, to meet others with similar aims. Local History Societies exist for this purpose; they welcome visitors and new members. The Eastleigh and District Local History Society meets on the fourth Thursday of the month, the Botley and Curdridge Society on the last Friday of the month, and the West End Society on the first Wednesday of the month, except in July and August when outside visits are usually organised.
    [Show full text]
  • SANITARY SURVEY REPORT the Solent 2013
    EC Regulation 854/2004 CLASSIFICATION OF BIVALVE MOLLUSC PRODUCTION AREAS IN ENGLAND AND WALES SANITARY SURVEY REPORT The Solent 2013 SANITARY SURVEY REPORT SOLENT Cover photo: Oyster sampling in the Solent CONTACTS: For enquires relating to this report or For enquires relating to policy matters on further information on the the implementation of sanitary surveys in implementation of sanitary surveys in England: England and Wales: Simon Kershaw Beverley Küster Food Safety Group Hygiene Delivery Branch Cefas Weymouth Laboratory Enforcement and Delivery Division Barrack Road, Food Standards Agency The Nothe Aviation House Weymouth 125 Kingsway Dorset London DT43 8UB WC2B 6NH +44 (0) 1305 206600 +44 (0) 20 7276 8000 [email protected] [email protected] © Crown copyright, 2013. Native oysters and other bivalve species in the Solent 2 SANITARY SURVEY REPORT SOLENT STATEMENT OF USE: This report provides a sanitary survey for bivalve molluscs in the Solent, as required under EC Regulation 854/2004. It provides an appropriate hygiene classification zoning and monitoring plan based on the best available information with detailed supporting evidence. The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) undertook this work on behalf of the Food Standards Agency (FSA). CONSULTATION: Consultee Date of consultation Date of response Environment Agency 19/04/2013 - Isle of Wight Council 19/04/2013 - New Forest District Council 19/04/2013 - Portsmouth Port Health 19/04/2013 - Southampton Port Health 19/04/2013 - Southern IFCA 19/04/2013 21/05/2013 Southern Water 19/04/2013 - RECOMMENDED BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE: Cefas, 2013. Sanitary survey of the Solent. Cefas report on behalf of the Food Standards Agency, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements for classification of bivalve mollusc production areas in England and Wales under of EC Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire Salmon Seminar 5Th October 1993 Contents
    k *• 106 ; HAMPSHIRE SALMON SEMINAR 5TH OCTOBER 1993 CONTENTS PAGES 1-4 Chairman’s Introduction Arthur Humbert, Chairman Fisheries Advisory Committee 5-9 Introduction by Robin Crawshaw, Hampshire Area Fisheries Manager, NRA Southern Region 10-15 Introduction by Mick Lunn, Test & Itchen Association 16-22 Spawning Success Alisdair Scott, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 23-28 Questions 29-33 What is the NRA doing? Lawrence Talks, Hampshire Area Fisheries Officer, NRA Southern Region 34-38 Questions 39-51 Migrating to Sea Ian Russell, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 52-60 Questions 61-66 Returning from the Sea and Movement up River Adrian Fewings, Fisheries Scientist, NRA Southern Region 67-75 Summary Dr Tony Owen, Regional Fisheries Manager, NRA Southern Region 76-97 Open Forum Chairman's Introduction ARTHUR HUMBERT Chairman Fisheries Advisory Committee 1 NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY HAMPSHIRE SALMON SEMINAR - 5TH OCTOBER. 1993 Chairman’s Introduction: Arthur Humbert, Chairman Fisheries Advisory Committee Well, good evening ladies and gentlemen, as your Chairman it's my pleasure to address you briefly, and then to hand over to speakers. It will seem there is a programme in this book and it tells you when the questions may be asked. Now there's an old saying that you shouldn't believe all that you read in the press and I've been reading and hearing gloomy things about that.... I see words like "extinction” and "disappearance". Well that is past history. There was a danger of that years ago but the NRA has tackled the problem and we are now in an improving situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Medieval & Modern Berkshire & Hampshire
    POST MEDIEVAL AND MODERN (INDUSTRIAL, MILITARY, INSTITUTIONS AND DESIGNED LANDSCAPES) HAMPSHIRE AND BERKSHIRE David Hopkins November 2006 Introduction Hampshire. Hampshire is dominated by the chalk landscape which runs in a broad belt, east west, across the middle of the county. The northern edge runs through Pilot Hill and Basingstoke, the southern edge through Kings Somborne and Horndean. These are large, open and fertile landscapes dominated by agriculture. Agriculture is the principle force behind the character of the landscape and the evolution of the transport network and such industry as exists. There are large vistas, with nucleated villages, isolated farms and large extents of formal enclosure. Market towns developed linked by transport routes. Small scale processing using the water power available from streams was supported by, and eventually replaced by, growing industrialisation in some towns, usually those where modern transport (such as rail) allowed development. These towns expanded and changed in character, whilst other less well placed towns continue to retain their market town character. North and south of the chalk are bands of tertiary deposits, sands, gravels and clays. Less fertile and less easy to farm for much of their history they have been dominated by Royal Forest. Their release from forest and small scale nature of the agricultural development has lead to a medieval landscape, with dispersed settlement and common edge settlement with frequent small scale isolated farms. The geology does provide opportunities for extractive industry, and the cheapness of the land, and in the north the proximity to London, led to the establishment of military training areas, and parks and gardens developed by London’s new wealthy classes.
    [Show full text]