Strategies for Sustainable Development, Kars, Turkey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strategies for Sustainable Development, Kars, Turkey Province of Municipality Kars of Kars Strategies for Sustainable Development, Kars, Turkey Prepared by: Institute for International Urban Development Cambridge, MA Sponsored by: The Christensen Fund September 2006 Report for The Christensen Fund: Strategies for Sustainable Development in Kars, Turkey Institute for International Urban Development Cambridge, MA - 2 - Report for The Christensen Fund: Strategies for Sustainable Development in Kars, Turkey STUDY TEAM Mona Serageldin, Team Leader Beti Minkin Berhan Ipek Mustafa Gönen Christa Lee-Chuvala Felicity Chan The Institute would like to acknowledge the excellent assistance received from Ceren Özgen of Istanbul Technical University and Ihsan Karayazi of Kars Municipality in the preparation of this report. We also wish to recognize the contribution of Turan Atalay of Kars Municipality and Yusuf Yurdalan and Medet Özeri of Kars Province. This study is sponsored by the Christensen Fund. Institute for International Urban Development Cambridge, MA - 3 - Report for The Christensen Fund: Strategies for Sustainable Development in Kars, Turkey TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF MEETINGS................................................................................................................... 7 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 9 2 THE ROLE OF KARS PROVINCE IN THE EASTERN ANATOLIA REGION ...... 11 2.1 Socio-economic Development.................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Turkey State Planning Organization’s Socio-economic Development Index ......... 11 2.1.2 Priority Development Regions Program.................................................................. 14 2.2 Major energy and transportation projects affecting the region ............................ 15 2.2.1 The TRACECA Transit Corridors........................................................................... 15 2.2.2 The Baku-Ceyhan-Tiblisi Pipeline .......................................................................... 17 2.3 Preserving biodiversity in the Kars region .............................................................. 19 2.3.1 Irano-Anatolian Biodiversity Hotspot ..................................................................... 20 2.3.2 The World Wildlife Fund’s Global 200................................................................... 20 2.3.3 Ecoregions in Kars Province ................................................................................... 21 2.3.4 Internationally Important Bird Areas in the Kars Region........................................ 22 2.3.5 The Coruh River Hydroelectric Project................................................................... 23 2.4 Regional rural settlement patterns........................................................................... 24 2.4.1 Distribution of Rural Settlements ............................................................................ 24 2.4.2 Water infrastructure in villages in the Kars region.................................................. 26 2.5 Migration .................................................................................................................... 26 2.5.1 Migratory Movements in Eastern Anatolia and the Kars Region............................ 26 2.5.2 Survey on Rural-Urban Linkages ............................................................................ 27 2.5.3 The Emergence of Hometown Associations............................................................ 34 3 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF VILLAGES IN KARS PROVINCE.............. 37 3.1 Interviews of village households ............................................................................... 38 3.1.1 Profile of Rural Households .................................................................................... 38 3.1.2 Livelihoods .............................................................................................................. 39 3.1.3 Rural standards of living.......................................................................................... 41 3.1.4 Challenges facing rural households......................................................................... 42 3.1.5 Links between rural and urban economies .............................................................. 43 3.1.6 Case studies: Links between village households and migrants in Kars................... 47 3.2 Villages affected by the BTC Pipeline ...................................................................... 49 3.2.1 BTC’s Sustainable Rural Development Projects implemented in Kars Province by SÜRKAL ................................................................................................................. 49 3.3 Assessing rural development potential..................................................................... 53 3.3.1 Animal Husbandry................................................................................................... 53 3.3.2 Comparative analysis of the experience of three villages: Azat, Borluk and Bulanik..................................................................................................................... 55 3.3.3 Selected villages with high development potential in key areas.............................. 57 3.4 Meetings with women, youth and children in the villages...................................... 63 3.4.1 Pilot session with youth in Akcakale Village .......................................................... 64 3.5 Summary of recommendations for village development ........................................ 65 4 INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN KARS MUNICIPALITY............................. 67 4.1 Improving access to donor grants and other funding opportunities ..................... 67 4.2 Development of Urban Agriculture in Kars ............................................................ 68 Institute for International Urban Development Cambridge, MA - 5 - Report for The Christensen Fund: Strategies for Sustainable Development in Kars, Turkey 4.3 Preparation of a Development Plan for the Municipality through a TESEV-led participatory process ................................................................................................. 72 5 TOURISM IN KARS PROVINCE ................................................................................... 75 5.1 Visitors to Kars Province .......................................................................................... 75 5.2 Major eco-tourism potential in Kars........................................................................ 78 5.2.1 The Ministry of Tourism Regional Development Plan ........................................... 79 5.2.2 Tours that offer visits to Northeast Anatolia ........................................................... 79 5.2.3 Major eco-tourism assets in Kars ............................................................................ 80 5.2.4 Potential thematic tourism routes ............................................................................ 83 5.2.5 Summary of recommendations for tourism development........................................ 88 6 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 91 7 ANNEXES ........................................................................................................................... 95 Institute for International Urban Development Cambridge, MA - 6 - Report for The Christensen Fund: Strategies for Sustainable Development in Kars, Turkey LIST OF MEETINGS Province ERDEN, Mehmet Ufuk Governor of Kars Province BEKİS, Kenan Province Directorate of Culture and Tourism, Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the Central Government YURDALAN, Yusuf Director, Department of Agriculture ÖZERI, Medet Department of Agriculture Municipality ALİBEYOĞLU, Naif Mayor of Kars; President, Turkish Association of Local Authorities ERDEM, Funda Consultant to the Mayor KARAYAZI, İhsan Project Coordinator ATALAY, Turan Directorate of Public Works – Kars Municipality ŞAMİLOĞLU, Nihal Director of Women’s Commission, Kars City Council International Organizations INNES, John Principal Social Sector Specialist, World Bank, Ankara Office ÇAĞLAYAN, Şükran CIP/Social Coordinator, The Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Company (BTC) DENIAU, Laurent Embassy of France, Bilateral Program Coordinator with the Ministry of Agriculture National Organizations KAVALA, Osman Anadolu Kültür PAŞAOĞLU, Serbülent Project Manager, SÜRKAL AYTAR, Volkan TESEV TOKSÖZ, Fikret Director, TESEV ASLAN, Meltem TESEV Local Organizations YAZICI, Sezai Secretary General of Kars City Council SEZER, Erhan Member of Commission of Trans-border Economic and Trade Relations with Caucasian Countries GÜVENSOY, Ali Head of Chamber of Commerce and Industry ZAMAN, Ali Head of Council, Chamber of Commerce and Industry DANYILDIZ, Mustafa Board Member, Chamber of Commerce and Industry KOCABIÇAK, Yasemin Professor of the EU Tourism Training Course, Department of Tourism and Hotel Management, Kafkas University AKAT, Soner Head of the Kars Bee-Breeders Union KIZIR, İsmail Assistant to the Head of the Kars Bee-Breeders Union Institute for International Urban Development Cambridge, MA - 7 - Report for The Christensen Fund: Strategies for Sustainable Development in Kars, Turkey 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings and recommendations of a project undertaken in close collaboration with the Provincial Administration and the Municipality of Kars to
Recommended publications
  • A Review on Reading-Supported Values Education of 7Th Grade Students (Case of Kars Province, Turkey)
    European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu doi: 10.5281/zenodo.898176 Volume 3 │ Issue 10 │ 2017 A REVIEW ON READING-SUPPORTED VALUES EDUCATION OF 7TH GRADE STUDENTS (CASE OF KARS PROVINCE, TURKEY)i Berna Ürün Karahanii, Tazegül Demir Atalay Turkish Education Department, Kafkas Üniversity, Kars, Turkey Abstract: As is known, reading is a skill the individual faces throughout his/her life. Reading, which is also one of the four basic language skills, allows an individual to establish a connection with life. So that, self-improvement of the individual, the process of understanding and interpreting what is happening around him/her, expressing himself/herself and communicating with others, achieving success in education process, and living-conveying the culture earn success with correct acquisition and continuity of this skill. Individuals, who read and define themselves and their environment correctly, succeed also in understanding and transferring process of cultural structures. Each individual adopts the culture and value structure of the society where he/she lives. For this reason, it is important for individuals to understand some local and universal values correctly and to exhibit correct behaviors in this process. To do this, education about some value concepts are given to the secondary school students by the National Education. The population of the study consisted of 7th-grade students studying in two secondary schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education. While one group was the experimental group, the other one was the control group. While a values education supported with reading materials was given in one of these schools, a values education without any intervention of the teacher in the process was given at the other school.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Foreign Trade, East Border Gates and Entrepreneurship Culture in Tra2 Area: a Case of Turkey1
    International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 24 [Special Issue – December 2012] The Relationship between Foreign Trade, East Border Gates and Entrepreneurship Culture in Tra2 Area: A Case of Turkey1 Adem KARAKAŞ Kafkas University, Department of Economics Kars, Turkey Sebahattin YILDIZ Kafkas University, Department of Business Administration Kars, Turkey Abstract The purpose of this research is to reveal the relationship between entrepreneurship culture, boarder gates and foreign trade dates in TRA2 area (Kars, Ağrı, Ardahan, Iğdır) in Turkey. Entrepreneurship values such as success need, focus of control, getting risk, tolerance to uncertain, trust and innovation were measured via questionnaire. Foreign trade datas were analyzed via Turkish Statistical Institution. The effects of border gates on entrepreneurship culture and foreign trade were disputed. Besides, the supports and the potential effect of SERKA, development agency in this area, on foreign trade and entrepreneurship were emphasized. In addition, the first ten goods regarding import and export in the area and the foreign trade volume and balance of foreign trade according to provinces were revealed. Keywords: Foreign Trade, Enterpreneurship, TRA2, Kars, Turkey. 1. Introduction Turkey has taken higher steps in world economy in respect of economical structure coming into prominence at international arena and important changes occuring during the recent years. However, she faces the risk of qualitatively uprising differences among regions. The differences in
    [Show full text]
  • Field Surveys in Ardahan in 2016
    Anatolia Antiqua Revue internationale d'archéologie anatolienne XXV | 2017 Varia Field surveys in Ardahan in 2016 Sami Patacı and Ergün Laflı Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/anatoliaantiqua/452 DOI: 10.4000/anatoliaantiqua.452 Publisher IFEA Printed version Date of publication: 1 May 2017 Number of pages: 115-126 ISBN: 978-2-36245-066-2 ISSN: 1018-1946 Electronic reference Sami Patacı and Ergün Laflı, « Field surveys in Ardahan in 2016 », Anatolia Antiqua [Online], XXV | 2017, Online since 01 May 2019, connection on 21 December 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ anatoliaantiqua/452 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/anatoliaantiqua.452 Anatolia Antiqua TABLE DES MATIERES N. Pınar ÖZGÜNER et Geoffrey D. SUMMERS The Çevre Kale Fortress and the outer enclosure on the Karacadağ at Yaraşlı 1 Abuzer KIZIL et Asil YAMAN A group of transport amphorae from the territorium of Ceramus: Typological observations 17 Tülin TAN The hellenistic tumulus of Eşenköy in NW Turkey 33 Emre TAŞTEMÜR Glass pendants in Tekirdağ and Edirne Museums 53 Liviu Mihail IANCU Self-mutilation, multiculturalism and hybridity. Herodotos on the Karians in Egypt (Hdt. 2.61.2) 57 CHRONIQUES DES TRAVAUX ARCHEOLOGIQUES EN TURQUIE 2016 Erhan BIÇAKÇI, Martin GODON et Ali Metin BÜYÜKKARAKAYA, Korhan ERTURAÇ, Catherine KUZUCUOĞLU, Yasin Gökhan ÇAKAN, Alice VINET Les fouilles de Tepecik-Çiftlik et les activités du programme Melendiz préhistorique, campagne 2016 71 Çiğdem MANER Preliminary report on the forth season of the Konya-Ereğli Survey (KEYAR) 2016 95 Sami PATACI et Ergün LAFLI Field surveys in Ardahan in 2016 115 Erkan KONYAR, Bülent GENÇ, Can AVCI et Armağan TAN The Van Tušpa Excavations 2015-2016 127 Martin SEYER, Alexandra DOLEA, Kathrin KUGLER, Helmut BRÜCKNER et Friederike STOCK The excavation at Limyra/Lycia 2016: Preliminary report 143 Abuzer KIZIL, Koray KONUK, Sönmez ALEMDAR, Laurent CAPDETREY, Raymond DESCAT, Didier LAROCHE, Enora LE QUERE, Francis PROST et Baptiste VERGNAUD Eurômos : rapport préliminaire sur les travaux réalisés en 2016 161 O.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia, Republic of | Grove
    Grove Art Online Armenia, Republic of [Hayasdan; Hayq; anc. Pers. Armina] Lucy Der Manuelian, Armen Zarian, Vrej Nersessian, Nonna S. Stepanyan, Murray L. Eiland and Dickran Kouymjian https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T004089 Published online: 2003 updated bibliography, 26 May 2010 Country in the southern part of the Transcaucasian region; its capital is Erevan. Present-day Armenia is bounded by Georgia to the north, Iran to the south-east, Azerbaijan to the east and Turkey to the west. From 1920 to 1991 Armenia was a Soviet Socialist Republic within the USSR, but historically its land encompassed a much greater area including parts of all present-day bordering countries (see fig.). At its greatest extent it occupied the plateau covering most of what is now central and eastern Turkey (c. 300,000 sq. km) bounded on the north by the Pontic Range and on the south by the Taurus and Kurdistan mountains. During the 11th century another Armenian state was formed to the west of Historic Armenia on the Cilician plain in south-east Asia Minor, bounded by the Taurus Mountains on the west and the Amanus (Nur) Mountains on the east. Its strategic location between East and West made Historic or Greater Armenia an important country to control, and for centuries it was a battlefield in the struggle for power between surrounding empires. Periods of domination and division have alternated with centuries of independence, during which the country was divided into one or more kingdoms. Page 1 of 47 PRINTED FROM Oxford Art Online. © Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoparasites Determined by Fecal Examination in Sheep in Erzurum Province Erzurum İlinde Yetiştirilen Koyunlarda Dışkı Bakısı Ile Tespit Edilen Parazitler
    Original Investigation Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2019;43(4):187-93 187 Özgün Araştırma DOI: 10.4274/tpd.galenos.2019.6512 Endoparasites Determined by Fecal Examination in Sheep in Erzurum Province Erzurum İlinde Yetiştirilen Koyunlarda Dışkı Bakısı ile Tespit Edilen Parazitler Muzaffer Akyüz, Rıdvan Kirman, Sali Yaya, Hatice Gülbeyen, Esin Güven Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Erzurum, Turkey Cite this article as: Akyüz M, Kirman R, Yaya S, Gülbeyen H, Güven E. Endoparasites Determined by Fecal Examination in Sheep in Erzurum Province. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2019;43(4):187-93. ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the current study was to determine the presence and prevalence of Eimeria and helminth species in sheep raised in Erzurum province by using fecal examination. Methods: Faecal samples were collected from a total of 784 sheep raised in Aziziye, Yakutiye and Palandöken districts between February-March 2019. The samples were examined by Fulleborn’s flotation, Benedect sedimentation, and Baermann-Wetzel methods. Results: Eimeria spp. and helminths were found in 49.36% (387/784) and 74.11% (581/784) of the samples, respectively. Identified Eimeria species were as follows: E. parva (59.68%), E. ovina (51.67%), E. faurei (47.80%), E. ahsata (39.27%), E. granulosa (36.62%), E. punctata (28.42%), E. pallida (26.09%), E. ovinoidalis (18.34%), E. crandallis (16.79%), E. intricata (15.76%), E. weybridgensis (11.36%) and E. marsica (6.20%). Helminth species identified at genus/species level were Dicrocoelium spp. (33.91%), Fasciola spp. (5.68%), Paramphistomum spp. (2.58%), Moniezia spp. (5.85%), Trichostrongylid type egg (49.05%), Marshallagia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections of 1904'S Erzurum to Current Erzurum
    ITU A|Z • Vol 13 No 2 • July 2016 • 157-173 Reflections of 1904’s Erzurum to current Erzurum Ömer ATABEYOĞLU [email protected] • Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey Received: April 2015 • Final Acceptance: January 2016 Abstract Human activities and natural influences contribute to the heritage of a city through their richness. The relationship of a city’s historical processes and their contemporary reflections may only be assessed with the data and documents in- herited from its past periods. Erzurum City has a rich and bright historical past. Erzurum as one of the most crucial cities of the past has brought a glorious heritage from past to present. The oldest original map that serves as a source of information on the structure of the city is the one drawn by Fuat Bey in 1904 that is kept in Erzurum museum. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the present status of Erzurum and its past through information obtained from the 1904 city plan of Erzurum. The study was initiated with a survey of the literature on the history and urban culture of Erzurum City and the evaluation of data collected from the 1904 map. Afterwards, the data provided on Fuat Bey’s Map is compared with today’s data of Erzurum. The coordinates have been taken, and the buildings and structures mentioned on the map which have survived until today have been photographed. Furthermore, their present situations, their usage and their functions in urban structure of Erzurum have been revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. Ardahan Il Özel Idaresi 2018 Yili Faaliyet Raporu
    T.C. ARDAHAN İL ÖZEL İDARESİ 2018 YILI FAALİYET RAPORU İÇİNDEKİLER ÜST YÖNETİCİNİN SUNUŞU 1 I- GENEL BİLGİLER 2-14 A- Misyon ve Vizyon 15 1- Misyon 15 2- Vizyon 15 B- Yetki, Görev ve Sorumluluklar 15-26 C- İdareye İlişkin Bilgiler 27-84 1- Fiziksel Yapı 27-39 2- Örgüt Yapısı 40 3- Bilgi ve Teknolojik Kaynaklar 41 4- İnsan Kaynakları 42-46 5- Sunulan Hizmetler 47-78 6- Yönetim ve İç Kontrol Sistemi 79-84 II- AMAÇ VE HEDEFLER 85-88 A- İdarenin Amaç ve Hedefleri 85-87 B- Temel Politikalar ve Öncelikler 88 III- FAALİYETLERE İLİŞKİN BİLGİ VE DEĞERLENDİRMELER 88-156 A- Mali Bilgiler 88-91 1- Bütçe Uygulama Sonuçları 88-89 2- Temel Mali Tablolara İlişkin Açıklamalar 89-91 3- Mali Denetim Sonuçları 91 B- Performans Bilgileri 91-160 1- Faaliyet ve Proje Bilgileri 91-134 2- Performans Sonuçları Tablosu 135-140 3- Performans Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi 141-151 4-Performans Bilgi Sisteminin Değerlendirilmesi 152-154 5-Faaliyet sonuçları Tablosu 155 6- Kesin Mizan 156-158 7- Bilanço 159-160 IV- KURUMSAL KABİLİYET VE KAPASİTENİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ 161 A- Üstünlükler 161 B- Zayıflıklar 161 V- ÖNERİ VE TEDBİRLER 162-167 Mali Hizmetler Birim Yöneticisinin Beyanı 164 Harcama Yetkilisi İç Kontrol Güvence Beyanı 165 Üst Yönetici İç Kontrol Güvence Beyanı 166 Değerlendirme ve Raporun Karara Bağlanması 167 ÜST YÖNETİCİNİN SUNUŞU Sürekli ilerlemeyi ve gelişmeyi temel ilke olarak benimsediğimiz, çağdaş bir yerel yönetimcilik anlayışı içerisinde, İlimizin önceliklerini göz önünde bulundurarak, hizmetlerimizi belli bir plan dâhilinde gerçekleştirip, sahip olduğumuz kaynakları verimli ve etkin bir şekilde kullanmaya özen gösterip, 2018 yılı çalışma sezonunu geride bırakmış bulunuyoruz.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Fieldwork in the Region of Ani Christina Maranci I Study the Medieval Armenian Monuments—Churche
    In the Traces: Reflections on Fieldwork in the Region of Ani Christina Maranci I study the medieval Armenian monuments—churches, monasteries, fortresses, palaces, and more—in what is now eastern Turkey (what many call western Arme- nia). For me, this region is at once the most beautiful, and most painful, place on earth. I am the grandchild of survivors of the Armenian Genocide of 1915–22, in which Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire suffered mass deportation and extermination: a crime that still goes unrecognized by the Turkish state.1 Scholars have characterized the Armenian monuments in Turkey as physical traces of their lost homeland.2 While my scholarship addresses these sites as historical and archi- tectural/artistic phenomena, that work does not often capture the moods and emotions I feel when I am there.3 I hope to offer here a sense of the more personal dimensions of firsthand work with the buildings and their landscapes. Many important medieval Armenian monuments stand on and around the closed international border between the Republics of Turkey and Armenia. Some of them are accessible to tourists, while others, like the church of Mren, remain forbidden, as they lie within or too close to the military zone. Dated to circa 638, and once part of the princely territory of the Kamsarakan family, Mren became the summer residence of the royal Armenian Bagratids in the tenth century.4 Once surrounded by a network of buildings, vineyards, and roads, now the church stands alone. Figure 1 illustrates the Armenian high plateau: deforested from antiquity, it is a rocky tableland lacerated by gorges and ringed with mountain chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamuk's Kars and Its Others
    PAMUK’S KARS AND ITS OTHERS: AN ETHNOGRAPHY ON IDENTIFICATIONS AND BOUNDARIES OF ETHNICITY, NATIONALISM AND SECULARISM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY KÜBRA ZEYNEP SARIASLAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE PROGRAM OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2010 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences ____________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunı şık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ____________________ Prof. Dr. Ay şe Saktanber Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ____________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sabine Strasser Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Tayfun Atay (A.Ü., ETH) ____________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sabine Strasser (METU, SOC) ____________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Aykan Erdemir (METU, SOC) ____________________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Kübra Zeynep Sarıaslan Signature : iii ABSTRACT PAMUK’S KARS AND ITS OTHERS: AN ETHNOGRAPHY ON IDENTIFICATIONS AND BOUNDARIES OF ETHNICITY, NATIONALISM AND SECULARISM Sarıaslan, Kübra Zeynep M.S., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sabine Strasser September 2010, 118 pages Kars is an ethnically diverse city located at the North East Turkey, neighboring Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Regional Migration and Intermarriage Among Kurds in Turkey, Economics and Sociology, Vol
    Sinan Zeyneloğlu, Yaprak Civelek, 139 ISSN 2071-789X Ibrahim Sirkeci RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH Zeyneloğlu, S., Civelek, Y., Sirkeci, I. (2016), Inter-regional Migration and Intermarriage among Kurds in Turkey, Economics and Sociology, Vol. 9, No 1, pp. 139-161. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-1/10 Sinan Zeyneloğlu, INTER-REGIONAL MIGRATION Zirve University, Gaziantep, Turkey, AND INTERMARRIAGE AMONG Regent’s Centre for Transnational KURDS IN TURKEY Studies, Regent’s University, London, UK, ABSTRACT. This study examines interregional migration E-mail: [email protected] and intermarriage of internal migrant Kurds in Turkey using the latest available census data. Unlike many other Yaprak Civelek, studies, birth region is used as a proxy of ethnicity due to Istanbul Arel University, the apparent language shift among the Kurds in Turkey. Istanbul, Turkey, To ensure comparability, only regions where both Turkish E-mail: and Kurdish populations co-exist are selected for analysis [email protected] of intermarriage. Analysis of language shift is based on the 2003 Turkish Demographic Health Survey data to ensure Ibrahim Sirkeci, temporal comparability with the 2000 Census. Variables Regent’s Centre for Transnational used for tabulation are sex, age group, region of residence Studies, and educational attainment. As prevalence of intermarriage Regent’s University, remains rather constant within each education category, London, UK, the increase in intermarriage of Kurds to non-Kurds at the E-mail: [email protected] aggregate level appears to be a product of rising education. Also the gender gap in favour of males appears to be a construct of differences in educational attainment levels, since Kurdish women out-marry more than their male co- ethnics once they have completed primary education or Received: October, 2015 studied further.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Church Timeline
    “I should like to see any power of the world destroy this race, this small tribe of unimportant people, whose history is ended, whose wars have all been fought and lost, whose structures have crumbled, whose literature is unread, whose music is unheard, whose prayers are no longer uttered. Go ahead, destroy this race. Let us say that it is again 1915. There is war in the world. Destroy Armenia. See if you can do it. Send them from their homes into the desert. Let them have neither bread nor water. Burn their houses and their churches. See if they will not live again. See if they will not laugh again.” –William Saroyan ARMENIAN CHURCH TIMELINE 1. Birth of the Holy Savior Jesus Christ in Bethlehem. Years later, an Armenian prince, Abqar of Edessa (Urfa), invites Jesus to his court to cure him of an illness. Abgar’s messengers encounter Jesus on the road to Calvary and receive a piece of cloth impressed with the image of the Lord. When the cloth is brought back to Edessa, Abgar is healed. 33. Crucifixion, Resurrection and Ascension of Jesus Christ On the 50th day after the Resurrection (Pentecost)the Holy Spirit descends upon the Apostles gathered in Jerusalem. 43. The Apostle Thaddeus comes to Armenia to preach Christianity. He is martyred in Artaz in southeastern Armenia. 66-68. The Apostle Bartholomew preaches in Armenia. He is martyred in Albac, also in southeastern Armenia. The Armenian Church is apostolic because of the preaching of the Apostles Thaddeus and Bartholomew in Armenia. 75. King Sanatruk and his daughter, Sandoukht convert to Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • TURKEY Eastern Anatolia (MDGF- 1792)
    Alliances for Culture Tourism (ACT) in TURKEY Eastern Anatolia (MDGF- 1792) Culture and Development Total Budget: USD 3,800,000 Budget by Agency: UNICEF: 670,890 UNESCO: 830,320 UNDP: 1,697,450 WTO: 601,340 Participating Gov. Entities: Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Start Date: 11 December 2008 End Date: 11 June 2011 Extension: 30 December 2011 Disbursements: First Disbursement: 11 December 2008 USD 1,657,460 Second Disbursement: 21 April 2010 USD 2,122,527 In Brief: The joint program will mobilize the culture sector in Turkey’s least developed region – east Anatolia. The result will be increased incomes and enhanced understanding of “shared” culture between the people of eastern Anatolia and of neighbouring countries and among people of different faiths. This will be achieved by building capacities of managers of cultural assets, local authorities and civil society in eastern Anatolia to protect heritage while also benefiting from it in sustainable tourism practices through provision of tourism business development services at various sectors. At the end of the program, local authorities and civil society will be able to identify and manage shared culture assets in line with international norms and respecting the values attributed to these assets by people in other countries, from other background or of different faiths than their own. Similarly, an increased understanding of shared culture will be achieved at the national level. Outcomes: Pro-poor sectoral (tourism) development policies implemented with framework of social (cohesion) integration policies by recognizing pluralism, dialogue of cultures and the establishment of a culture of peace in Easter Anatolia and with peoples of neighboring countries by 2010.
    [Show full text]