DOCSLIB.ORG

The Influence of Text Messaging Systems on Interpersonal Communication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Influence of Text Messaging Systems on Interpersonal Communication The Influence of Text Messaging Systems on Interpersonal Communication Thesis by Zuzana Topolska Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Art in Communication and Mass Media State University of New York Empire State College 2015 Reader: Dr. Todd Nesbitt Acknowledgement I would like to thank to the professor Todd Nesbitt for his patience, valuable advice and availability to meet and discuss at any time. Furthermore, I would like to thank to my family and friends, who provided me with enormous support anytime it was necessary. Table of Contents Introduction 5 1 Classical Model of Interpersonal Communication 7 1.1 The Nature of Interpersonal Communication 8 1.2 Standards of Interpersonal Communication 10 1.3 Interpersonal Relationships 11 2 Technology and Interpersonal Communication 14 2.1 Primary-Secondary-Digital Orality 14 2.2 A Brief History of Sending Messages 16 2.3 Short Message Service (SMS) 18 2.4 Modern and Post-modern Approaches to Text 19 3 Effects of Digital Orality 20 3.1 Language 20 3.2 Professional Communication 23 3.3 Relationships 26 3.4 Psychological Effects 31 3.5 Self-esteem 35 3.6 Gender Differences 37 3.7 Adults vs. teens 38 3.8 Deception 40 4 Primary Research 42 4.1 Findings 43 4.2 Limitations/ Future Direction 45 Conclusions 46 Tables 49 Works Cited 54 Abstract This bachelor degree thesis focuses on the digital form of communication, computer mediated communication (CMC) and short message service (SMS), which were discovered thanks to the constant innovation of technology. The main aim of the paper is to analyze the effects of the absence of verbal communication on classical interpersonal communication. The effects of communicating via SMS were examined based on the primary and secondary research. According to the both researches, the author found out that SMS usage has a substantial influence on language, communication, relationships, deception, and on the human psyche. The paper analyzes the above-mentioned effects and their impact on interpersonal communication. According to the findings, the author states that text messages are written on a mobile phone keyboard, what is very time-consuming, and, therefore, short forms, slang, and emoticons were implemented. Moreover, in the conclusion, the author states that the digital messages have changed the traditional form of language, in terms of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Therefore, communicators need to understand the language of text messages correctly in order to achieve effective interpersonal communication. Furthermore, SMS could positively influence the quality of individual life, as positive social interactions increase the personal self-esteem. In contrary, the findings have proven that SMS is not a sufficient tool for developing relationships due to the absence of verbal and non-verbal cues, which are more often present in the face-to-face communication. It does not influence intimate relationships in positive way, while SMS users tend to interact more with strangers than with their close relatives. The deception is also hardly detected through text messages, cause non-verbal behavior such as facial expressions and body movements cannot be observed. Introduction According to DeVito (2001), communication is one of the fundamental components in today’s world. Initially, people started communicating orally and then progressively transferred into written forms of communication. Since then, oral and written communications have been inseparable and become part of human everyday life (Soffer, 2010). Consequently all forms of communication had been separated until the printing press was discovered. According to Gonzales (2014), 85% of world’s population owns a mobile phone; therefore has easy access to communication with their families, friends or partners. This digital mean of communication has shaped the traditional form of a writing style, in terms of spelling, punctuation, and grammar. The evolution of language was mainly affected by the speed of SMS, because it is more important for SMS users to reply quickly than grammatically correct. The use of mobile phones and SMS has significantly influenced interpersonal relationships. SMS is a tool mainly integrated into teen culture. However, it has affected others as well. Individuals are strengthening their relationships with strangers meanwhile their relationships with family, friends and loved ones are weakening (Soffer, 2010). Moreover, SMS is a communications tool, where verbal and non-verbal aspects of communication are absent. Therefore, Soffer (2010) says that interpersonal communication via SMS is less effective than traditional face-to-face communication. He supports the statement by the fact that facial expressions, tone of a voice and body language, are not observable while 5 receiving text messages. Moreover, he believes that those are fundamental elements for creating personal or professional relationships. However, SMS technology has also brought many benefits to its users, such as; speed, security, and connection, which are highly, evaluated impacts of SMS in the world. According to Gonzales (2014), having supportive social interactions positively affects the individual´s self-esteem. Self-esteem determines a mental health and, therefore, plays a relevant part of individual’s life. Moreover, the emergence of CMC and SMS can be also considered as a useful tool for individuals referring to the fact that if self –esteem is high; individuals are psychically healthier and consequently have a better quality of life (Gonzales, 2014). The main goal of this paper is to analyze the role and effects of short message service (SMS) communication on traditional interpersonal communication. This paper will define terms; detect historical roots of communication and its technologies. It will also describe characteristics of digital orality (where entire verbal communication is written) and provide a full picture of its effects on language, communication, deception and the human psyche. The paper is divided into four main chapters. The first chapter is dedicated to interpersonal communication, as people perform this activity on an everyday basis. Therefore, it is essential to understand its definition, historical roots and how the interpersonal relationships are created and developed. The second chapter focuses on an emergence of computer- mediated communication (CMC) and short message service (SMS). The third part analyzes its overall effects of SMS based on secondary research on linguistic approach, interpersonal relationships, deception and self-esteem. The last chapter introduces primary 6 research carried out by the author of the paper, in which overall findings are compared with the previous ones. In the center of this paper persists one central question: What effects does short message system use have on interpersonal communication? Since this field of study is quite new and just started in the 21th century, there are limited scientific studies facing this issue; therefore, the author has conducted research to support or contradict previous findings. Moreover, this paper will focus on the analysis of the short message system and its effects on traditional face-to-face communication. I Classical Model of Interpersonal Communication The first chapter is devoted to interpersonal communication. As this paper focuses on examining the effects of SMS on communication, readers first need to understand the nature of interpersonal communication (IC). People perform interpersonal communication every day, as a result of this, the majority of them believe that they are experts of IC and consequently underestimate its overall impacts (Hartley, 1999). However, understanding the IC is not as easy as it might seem. Therefore, this chapter will provide a broad analysis of the classical model of interpersonal communication, in particular, the face-to-face communication. More accurately, interpersonal communication, described in this chapter, has the following features: • It involves communication between two people. • The interaction is happening during face-to-face conversation. • Meanwhile both verbal and nonverbal characteristics of the individuals are present. 7 Moreover, interpersonal communication will not happen if the individuals are in the seclusion. Individual´s needs to interact with other person while cultural, environmental and individual differences are playing a crucial role (King, 2006). 1.1 The Nature of Interpersonal Communication As interpersonal communication is a global field of study, many different definitions are established. This paper adopted the following definition of an interpersonal communication. According to Clampitt’s model interpersonal communication is like a dance (Hartley, 1999). Dancers have to synchronize their body movements and arrive in an agreement of where they are going. Throughout the dance, they need to follow certain rules, but also have an opportunity for flexibility, as they can add their individual style of dancing into it. Moreover, a couple of more definitions and theories will be explained later. Moreover, significant linear model of communication, which is based on Clampitt’s definition, will be described. The model claims that communication is “linear and one-way” (Hartley, 1999). In the picture 1.1 shown below, interpersonal communication transformation is illustrated. The sender sends the message to the receiver through a particular channel, while some noise may occur during transmitting. This model shows how
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Literacy for Mobile Phones Module 3: Sms and Address Book
    DIGITAL LITERACY FOR MOBILE PHONES MODULE 3: SMS AND ADDRESS BOOK WORKSHEET ACTIVITY 1 | LANGUAGE Match the abbreviation or sms language to the meaning. The first one is done. 1 THNX or THX Great! 2 C U Oh my God! 3 RSVP before 4 OMG thanks 5 LOL Have a nice day! 6 GR8 at 7 ASAP See you. 8 @ By the way... 9 HAND Please reply. 10 B4 laughing out loud 11 BTW as soon as possible Write down any other abbreviations you know or use. :‐) What does this mean? Why would you use it? ACTIVITY 2 | READING AND RESPONDING TO AN SMS You receive these messages. Look at each message and answer the questions. Message 1 1a Who sent this text message? 1b What time was it sent? What date was it sent? 1c What is it about? 1d What do you need/have to do? © ACFE/AMES 2014 1 | 8 MODULE 3: SMS AND ADDRESS BOOK DIGITAL LITERACY FOR MOBILE PHONES WORKSHEET Message 2 2a Who sent this text message? 2b What time was it sent? What date was it sent? 2c What is it about? 2d What do you need to do? Message 3 3a Who sent this text message? 3b What time was it sent? What date was it sent? 3c What is it about? 3d What do you need to do? Message 4 4a Who sent this text message? 4b What time was it sent? What date was it sent? 4c What is it about? 4d What do you need to do? 2 | 8 © ACFE/AMES 2014 DIGITAL LITERACY FOR MOBILE PHONES MODULE 3: SMS AND ADDRESS BOOK WORKSHEET ACTIVITY 3 | SENDING A TEXT MESSAGE Part 1 When to Send an SMS Part 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Technology and the Topologies of Transmission: a Research Area for Historical Simulation
    Miguel, Amblard, Barceló & Madella (eds.) Advances in Computational Social Science and Social Simulation Barcelona: Autònoma University of Barcelona, 2014, DDD repository <http://ddd.uab.cat/record/125597> Information Technology and the Topologies of Transmission: a Research Area for Historical Simulation Nicholas Mark Gotts Independent researcher Email: [email protected] sensory qualities, and by how often similar objects have been Abstract—This paper surveys possibilities for applying the seen. They can be acquired in three ways: by being found, methods of agent-based simulation to the study of historical perhaps with subsequent modification, traded (within or out- transitions in communication technology. with the social group), or stolen; and all these methods could be included in a fairly simple model. Possession of such ob- INTRODUCTION jects could increase the probability that other individuals will ISTORY, in one sense, begins with the invention and cooperate with the owner – but also the possibility that they Hadoption of a particular information technology: writ- will attack the owner to acquire the object. Outcomes of such ing. Initially appearing in Mesopotamia some 5,000 years models (the distribution of prestige objects, peaceful or vio- ago, it has spread (mainly by diffusion, but with some proba- lent transfers of possession, survival of their possessors, ef- ble cases of independent invention) to cover effectively the fects on trade between groups) could be compared with ar- whole world. Other key communication technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Networks of Modernity: Germany in the Age of the Telegraph, 1830–1880
    OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 24/3/2021, SPi STUDIES IN GERMAN HISTORY Series Editors Neil Gregor (Southampton) Len Scales (Durham) Editorial Board Simon MacLean (St Andrews) Frank Rexroth (Göttingen) Ulinka Rublack (Cambridge) Joel Harrington (Vanderbilt) Yair Mintzker (Princeton) Svenja Goltermann (Zürich) Maiken Umbach (Nottingham) Paul Betts (Oxford) OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 24/3/2021, SPi OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 24/3/2021, SPi Networks of Modernity Germany in the Age of the Telegraph, 1830–1880 JEAN-MICHEL JOHNSTON 1 OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 24/3/2021, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Jean-Michel Johnston 2021 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2021 Impression: 1 Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    [Show full text]
  • D4d78cb0277361f5ccf9036396b
    critical terms for media studies CRITICAL TERMS FOR MEDIA STUDIES Edited by w.j.t. mitchell and mark b.n. hansen the university of chicago press Chicago and London The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2010 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2010 Printed in the United States of America 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 1 2 3 4 5 isbn- 13: 978- 0- 226- 53254- 7 (cloth) isbn- 10: 0- 226- 53254- 2 (cloth) isbn- 13: 978- 0- 226- 53255- 4 (paper) isbn- 10: 0- 226- 53255- 0 (paper) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Critical terms for media studies / edited by W. J. T. Mitchell and Mark Hansen. p. cm. Includes index. isbn-13: 978-0-226-53254-7 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-226-53254-2 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn-13: 978-0-226-53255-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-226-53255-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Literature and technology. 2. Art and technology. 3. Technology— Philosophy. 4. Digital media. 5. Mass media. 6. Image (Philosophy). I. Mitchell, W. J. T. (William John Th omas), 1942– II. Hansen, Mark B. N. (Mark Boris Nicola), 1965– pn56.t37c75 2010 302.23—dc22 2009030841 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48- 1992. Contents Introduction * W. J. T. Mitchell and Mark B. N. Hansen vii aesthetics Art * Johanna Drucker 3 Body * Bernadette Wegenstein 19 Image * W.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing the Medical Library Where Needed - at the Point of Care
    THE LISTER HILL NATIONAL CENTER FOR BIOMEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS A research division of the U.S. National Library of Medicine TECHNICAL REPORT LHNCBC-TR-2008-003 Bringing the Medical Library Where Needed - At the Point of Care September 2008 Paul Fontelo, M.D., M.P.H. Fang Liu, M.S. U.S. National Library of Medicine, LHNCBC 8600 Rockville Pike, Building 38A Bethesda, MD 20894 Table of Contents 1. Background ................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Project Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Project Significance .................................................................................................................... 7 4. Evidence-Based Medicine Tools ................................................................................................ 7 4.1 PubMed for Handhelds ......................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Features of PubMed for Handhelds (PMHh) ...................................................................... 11 4.2.1 PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) ‐ http://pubmedhh.nlm.nih.gov/nlm/pico/piconew.html .................................................................... 11 Current status and Implementation ................................................................................................... 12 Server analysis....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SMS Text Analysis: Language, Gender and Current Practices Muhammad Shaban Rafi Abstract This Article Tests the Assumption That S
    SMS Text Analysis: Language, Gender and Current Practices Muhammad Shaban Rafi 1 Abstract This article tests the assumption that SMS language is like a pidgin in every speech community. The article also examines the assumption that a great motor of SMS lives among females whose lexical and morpho-syntactic choices are different from males. It further speculates influence of SMS language on language of media. One hundred messages were taken randomly from 20 cell phones and perceptions of 25 males and 25 females were recorded on an ordinal scale for analysis. The text was analyzed to look into lexicology, morphology and syntactic levels of texters, and influence of SMS on language of commercials. The results show that a novice intelligible language has evolved through SMS, which is influencing language of media. A significant difference is found between male and female texters’ linguistic properties. Introduction Short Message Service (SMS) language tends to create a novice language, which has become an integral part of the multilingual world. It pursues simple sentences structure for communication. It is assumed that SMS syntactic and lexical choices by the texters are not so different from a child language. A child expresses his feelings through simple present progressive tense e.g. mom eating for ‘Mom is eating’ and Eating for ‘I am eating’. The empirical data show that SMS language over-looks orthographic and syntactic rules of a language with a great emphasis on written sounds and compressions e.g. 8 for ‘ate’, 2 for ‘to, two and too’, 4 for ‘four and for’, bcoz for ‘because’ etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Text Me: the Mutually Shaped Story of the Short Messaging Service (SMS)
    Abdilova The Mutually Shaped Story of the Short Messaging Service (SMS) Just Text Me: The Mutually Shaped Story of the Short Messaging Service (SMS) Lisa Abdilova Stanford University The more people text message, the better phone keyboards become; the more messages texters can send, the more they will write. This article demonstrates this mutual shaping phenomenon through a socialized history of text messaging communication from 1970 until now. While texting provides excellent benefits—including social connectivity and a platform for immediate, direct exchanges—it also raises concerns. Texting while driving, dining, and socializing are now all commonplace, and yet often frowned upon if not actually illegal. This essay explores several questions: how has text messaging changed our culture? How were cell phones developed, culturally integrated, and upgraded? How have mobile hardware and software been molded to consumer needs? Who uses the short messaging service (SMS) and for what? Through a close analysis of a series of texting’s critical elements—like the medium of choice, user demographics, billing, message content, and social implications—this essay will demonstrate how societal and technological influences have worked together to develop and continue to shape the text messaging phenomenon as we know it today. People love to text, and love to do so for more reasons than demographic or usage statistics can account for alone. Zhenghao and Liu conducted intensive in-depth semi-structured interviews with exchange students in China on why they use SMS text messaging in 2010, and thereby provide qualitatively descriptive insights into text messaging use. Their participants came from a variety of Western backgrounds and yet shared common perspectives in their answers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Texting/SMS Language on Academic Writing of Students
    12884 Shazia Aziz et al./ Elixir Ling. & Trans. 55 (2013) 12884-12890 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Linguistics and Translation Elixir Ling. & Trans. 55 (2013) 12884-12890 The Impact of Texting/SMS Language on Academic Writing of Students- What do we need to panic about? Shazia Aziz 1, Maria Shamim 2, Muhammad Faisal Aziz 3 and Priya Avais 4 1COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Lahore, Pakistan. 2COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Lahore, Pakistan. 3Ibri College of Technology, Ibri, Sultanate of Oman. 4Kinnaird College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The growing concern about the profuse use of texting endangering the standard forms in Received: 12 December 2012; language prompted the present research to determine the presence or absence of SMS Received in revised form: features in the academic writing of the participants. Triangulation was used for data 2 February 2013; collection i.e. questionnaires for learners and educators and samples of the learners’ English Accepted: 5 February 2013; written work were examined for SMS features. Suppliance in Obligatory Context was used for data recording. Simple average and ratio were used for descriptive analysis of the data. Keywords Contrary to the expectation, there were no significant evidences of these features in the Standard English, sample. It seems being proficient in standard forms, these learners are context conscious and Sociolinguistic, can switch to the appropriate register or style when writing formally .Thus the present study Orthography, has de mystified the popular belief about texting adversely affecting writing and thus Discursive practices, destroying Standard English.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholink.Org/Ojs/Index.Php/Selt Study in English Language Teaching Vol
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholink Journals www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/selt Study in English Language Teaching Vol. 1, No. 1; February 2013 Original Paper Languages, Code-Switching Practice and Primary Functions of Facebook among University Students Latisha Asmaak Shafie1* and Surina Nayan1 1 Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (Perlis), Perlis, Malaysia * Latisha Asmaak Shafie, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the languages used in Facebook wall posts and comments, code-switching practice of these multilingual university students and functional orientation of their Facebook wall posts and comments. This study was mainly based on the investigation of the latest 50 Facebook comments of 100 Malay public university students in Malaysia. The first language of these university students is Bahasa Malaysia and English is their second language. The content analysis of wall posts was used to analyze the code-switching language used in the Facebook and the primary functions of the Facebook comments by categorizing them using Thurlow’s (2003) SMS categories that contain nine orientations. The findings indicate that majority of the Facebook users comments are categorized under friendship maintenance orientation to maintain existing relationships and create new friendships. The findings indicate heavily abbreviated languages in English and Bahasa Malaysia. It is found that situational code-switching between English and Bahasa Malaysia is heavily utilized by multi-lingual Facebook users. The research is significant in a number of ways as it offers the communication culture of Facebook among public university students in Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis Study of Whatsapp Messenger's
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature ISSN 2200-3592 (Print), ISSN 2200-3452 (Online) Vol. 5 No. 6; November 2016 Flourishing Creativity & Literacy Australian International Academic Centre, Australia A Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis Study of WhatsApp Messenger’s Semantic Notifications Nisreen Al-Khawaldeh Department of English Language and Literature, The Hashemite University, Jordan E-mail: [email protected] Baker Bani-Khair (Corresponding author) Department of English Language and Literature, The Hashemite University, Jordan E-mail: [email protected] Bassil Mashaqba Department of English Language and Literature, The Hashemite University, Jordan E-mail: [email protected] Anas Huneety Department of English Language and Literature, The Hashemite University, Jordan E-mail: [email protected] Received: 05-06-2016 Accepted: 11-08-2016 Advance Access Published: September 2016 Published: 01-11-2016 doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.6p.158 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.6p.158 Abstract This study is the first to analyse WhatsApp’s semantic notifications particularly those of Jordanians. It also seeks to analyse the differences in these notifications’ language use by gender and endeavors to reveal some latent socio-cultural values affecting the way users make certain language choices in these online notifications. The study contributes to knowledge since such analysis helps to reveal unique networks of individuals communicating through Arabic and English in unique and innovative ways. It mainly assists in describing the members of the Jordanian society revealing a great deal of information about their personal status, their activities, society and problems. The discourse analysis of these notifications also describes how the language has been adjusted to online discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • WISMO Quik CDMA 1X RTT at Commands Interface Specification
    CDMA-C1 AT Commands Reference Guide Copyright and Technical Support CDMA C1 AT Commands Reference Guide S000478, Version E Use this AT Command Guide with the following: SocketModem Cell – MTSMC-C1, MTSMC-C1-V SocketModem iCell –MTSMC-C1-IP, MTSMC-C1-GP MultiModem iCell – MTSMC-C1-IP MultiModem iCell – MTCMR-C1 MultiModem rCell – MTCBA-C1-EN2 MultiModem Cell – MTCBA-C1 MultiConnect™ AW – MT200A2W-C1 Copyright This publication may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior expressed written permission from Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2011-2012, by Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. makes no representations or warranty with respect to the contents hereof and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. Furthermore, Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. reserves the right to revise this publication and to make changes from time to time in the content hereof without obligation of Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. to notify any person or organization of such revisions or changes. Trademarks SocketModem®, MultiModem®, Multi-Tech, and the Multi-Tech logo are registered trademarks of Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Sierra Wireless™ is a trademark of Sierra Wireless. Wavecom® is a registered trademark of Sierra Wireless S.A. in France and/or other countries. Contacting Multi-Tech Knowledge Base The Knowledge Base provides immediate access to support information and resolutions for all Multi-Tech products. Visit http://www.multitech.com/kb.go. Installation Resources To download manuals, firmware, and software, visit http://www.multitech.com/setup/product.go. Support Portal To create an account and submit a support case directly to our technical support team, visit: https://support.multitech.com Technical Support Business Hours: M-F, 9am to 5pm CT Country By Email By Phone Europe, Middle East, Africa: [email protected] +(44) 118 959 7774 U.S., Canada, all others: [email protected] (800) 972-2439 or (763) 717-5863 World Headquarters Multi-Tech Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Language and Slang
    Text Language and Slang Text Language Also known as SMS language, text language consists of the abbreviations and slang often used in texting and some other internet-based conversations, such as casual messaging through Facebook and other applications. The following list details some of the most commonly used abbreviations: LOL = laugh out loud. Used casually in text conversations with friends when something is funny. Additionally, abbreviations such as LMAO or just haha are also used often to indicate you are laughing. BRB = be right back. This is used when someone is busy for a moment and is planning on continuing a text or messaging conversation after they finish. BTW = by the way. BTW is a commonly used abbreviation used before someone reveals new information. ILY = I love you. ILY is used often with friends. GR8 = great. OMG = oh my god. This is a very common exclamation over text when something is exciting or surprising. THX = thanks. Other abbreviations for thank you include TY and TYSM which mean thank you and thank you so much. TMI = too much information. When someone has overshared information, or received more personal information than they wanted, they will use TMI. IDK = I don’t know. LMK = let me know. NVM = never mind. IKR(?) = I know, right? This is used when one is in agreement with someone else, and is also a common phrase in conversation. OFC = of course. Many of these abbreviations, while often used in text, are also used in casual conversation in person. All of these abbreviations, however, are only used in casual situations, and are not used in conversations or emails with Professors, in interviews, or professional situations.
    [Show full text]