Ancient Artillery: with Some Notes on Mons Meg. 191

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ancient Artillery: with Some Notes on Mons Meg. 191 ANCIENT ARTILLERY: WITH SOME NOTE MONN O S S MEG1 19 . I. ANCIENT ARTILLERY. WITH SOME NOTE MONON S S MEG. BY SIR JAMES BALFOUR PAUL, C.V.O., LL.D., F.S.A.ScoT. Artillery in the widest sense of the word—that is, offensive projectiles— is coeval with the beginnings of man: the first heing who picked up a ston thred ean wt witi h hostile inten t soma t e bird, beast r enemo , s ywa using artillery. Graduall e camh y o desirt e e greater forcd prean e- s missilescisiohi r ninventefo d ,an d bow arrowsd san , chipping flint heads for the latter, as we very well know. The sling was also an early piece of artillery, and was employed in its primitive form long after the Stone Age, witness the celebrated combat of David and Goliath. Later the sling was developed into a very formidable weapon in the shape of the catapultce d balistcee Romans—than th f o e former throwing dartsd an , the latter large stones, weighing, it is said, sometimes as much as three hundredweight. We are ignorant of their precise appearance, but there is little doubt tha Frence tth h trebuchet, use earln di y medieval timed san down to the middle of the fifteenth century, was a lineal descendant of the balista. It was a kind of sling, consisting of a long beam turning on a horizonta counterweighta s l axiwa d s en mountingborns it e n on ,eo t A . othee anth t poucra da h mad stronf eo g nettin leather go whicn ri h were placed heavy stones sometimes armed with an incendiary match. They were quite formidable weapone b o t s s the e a d timefo th t yha r bu ; firmly fixed in the ground, their range was limited and could not easil alterede yb thao s , t onc e rang eth s know ewa e enemnth y could take measure counteraco t s t their worst effects. But artillery in the modern acceptation of the word was not possible till after the invention of gunpowder. Now, it is usually stated that gun- powde knows Chinese rwa th o nt e centuries befor Christiae eth n erat bu ; latese th t authoritie f opinioo e sar n that this ide withous ai t foundation. No doub e Chinesth t e manufactured incendiary compositions \vhich burned fiercel d weran yt eout pu har ;o t dthe y alsoo t knew who make liquid fire, stink-pots othed ,an r abominations whic e Germanhth s presene usine th ar t ga t gunpowder t no day t bu ; . They had shortn i , o n , knowledg whatf eo cale w l explosives. Gunpowder, indeed, could not have been invented before the discovery f refinino t ar ge osaltpetreth f . Thi believes i s havo dt e been found out, accordin Coloneo gt l Hime latese th , t e subject,writeth n o Rogery b 1 r Hime'e 1Se s Origin f Artilleryo (London, 1915) wora , whico kt presene hth t write indebtes ri d for much of the information contained in the early part of this paper. 2 19 PROCEEDING E SOCIETYTH F O S , MARC , 1916H13 . Bacon in the middle of the thirteenth century. Its explosive property when mixed with sulphu charcoad an r s probablwa l y discovered accidentally. Bacon did not publish his discovery to the world at large, for reasons which need not be entered on here, but wrapped it up in a maze of cryptic writings only to be understood by alchemical adepts like himself. practicae th t Bu l applicatio gunpowdef no explosivn a s ra e force capable of expellin gprojectila e from some chambe r receptaclo r t takno ed edi place till long after the discovery of the substance itself. It is not till the year 1313 tha catce tw firse hth t glimps rudimentare th f eo ya gun n I . memorandum boo f thako t date belongin cite f Ghenth yo o gt t thers ei Fig . Ancien.1 t Gun, illustrate . (A.DMS . a 1327) n di . (Reproduce kiny db d permission of the authorities of Christ Church, Oxford.) an entry to the effect that " bussen" were first discovered in Germany by followine th monka n i d gan , yeanotes i t ri d that busse gunpowded nan r (or "s calledkruyt,i t i )s " a were exporte Englando t d . Bussen were originally a kind of hand grenade, and had long been known, so that nobody could possibly have said that they were first discovere 1313n di . The wor therefors di e evidentl believes sensei w d yne an ,usea o dt n di mea nkina f t gunmaythai e do B s a .t , fourteen years after thie w s librare havth n actuai f n y. eo a t occurI MS (fig l n . a pictur 1) .gu n s i a f eo Christ Church, Oxford, of date 1327. Whether it represents the gun sent Englano t 131n dknoi e 4 w archais i w t i not t c,bu enoug l conscienceal hn i . Imagine a large vase—a fat pot-bellied vase (indeed, the Italians called e earlth y guns vasi)— s nec it sides fitteks it n i laid I projectilee n . do th , consisting of a kind of magnified cross-bow quarrel or dart armed with a ANCIENT ARTILLERY: WITH SOME NOTES ON MONS MEG. 193 four-sided iron hea metal—probabld dan y brass—feathers tampioA . r no stopper must have been fitted projectile betweeth f o d e butd nth an e en t charge th f powdereo s otherwisa , e arroeth w would only have gonea few yards. It was fired from a touch-hole on the upper side of the vase, and we see the gunner applying his match. Flanders became the seat of the new industry of gun manufacture. The vase-shaped guns were soon improved upon. Small tubes of iron were next made throwing leaden projectiles: they were use groupsn di , t thebu y evidentl t provno d e ydi ver y satisfactory e gunmakerth d an , s then went to the other extreme and began to manufacture huge pieces of ordnance called bombards. These were made of longitudinal bars of forged iron arranged lik stavee ecaskth a f so , welded togethe held an rd in position by external hoops of wrought iron driven or shrunk on. Mons Meg is a good specimen of this kind of gun. These bombards—o t leasa r e smalleth t r size f them—wero s e th r efo most part breechloaders; that is, the barrel or chase of the gun was open at both ends, the powder and projectile being put in a separate chamber ope frontn i e chasy b th joined , t f i adjusteean o buto e d t th en t o t d iron wedges driven into an external case which enclosed the whole of the breech end of the gun. At first these bombards were simply laid on the ground on beams of wood and fired there. But the early gunners had to contend against several formidable disadvantages. In the first place, their gunpowder was of very poor quality, igniting with comparative slowness and fouling the gun terribly. It required, too, very careful ramming rammes homewa t loosi o df to i : t losei t mucexpulsivs it f ho e powerd an , t explodno tighd o t t allsilentldi ieto a f t ,bu ti y fizzley an d awayn i d an , cas elarga e volum escapes ga f eo d throug touch-holese hth . When, about 1419, corned powder was invented, the quality was much improved, but for long its use was confined to small pieces, as the large ones were not able withstano t shoce werdth d kan e liabl bursto et . In the second place, the early gunners were much handicapped by their total want of knowledge of recoil. In modern artillery this is overcome morn gu r les eo othey e b smord yth r yieldin an ro e, it scientifi o gt c methods into which it is unnecessary to enter. But in the old days all that coul mako t don e gunde s b eth e wa s overcom shoce eth resistin y kb g it. So they were banked up with planking and wedges and made immovable. This, of course, imposed a tremendous strain on the guns, and they burs frequentlo s t y that they were almos s greaa t sourca t e of dange enemye gunnertheio n rt th metho e ow o rTh t . s f firina sdo g increased this danger t firse gunneA th .t r approache e touch-holdth e with a red-hot wire, and he was not infrequently blown to bits. Then, to obviate this melancholy occurrence, a train of slow-burning powder VOL. L. 13 194. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, MARCH 13, 1916. e wagunth s. f laio Thidp to alons e beinth gd en g e igniteth t a d furthest from the touch-hole, the gunners took cover, and after the explosion the n weryf hidin o gu cam et e stilgou eth f andli there, , proceede e laboriouth o t d s tas f cleaninko loadind an t gi t witgi a h new charge. A third disadvantage which the early artillery possessed was the want of change of elevation and range.
Recommended publications
  • The Ballistic Performance of the Bombard Mons Meg
    ARTICLE IN PRESS HOSTED BY Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Defence Technology ■■ (2015) ■■–■■ www.elsevier.com/locate/dt 1bs_bs_query Q2 The ballistic performance of the bombard Mons Meg 2bs_bs_query Q1 3bs_bs_query Ian LEWTAS, Rachael MCALISTER *, Adam WALLIS, Clive WOODLEY, Ian CULLIS 4bs_bs_query QinetiQ, Fort Halstead, Sevenoaks, Kent T N14 7BP, UK 5bs_bs_query Received 28 September 2015; revised 30 November 2015; accepted 1 December 2015 6bs_bs_query Available online 7bs_bs_query 8bs_bs_query Abstract 9bs_bs_query The bombard Mons Meg, located in Edinburgh Castle, with a diameter of 19 inches (48 cm), was one of the largest calibre cannons ever built. 10bs_bs_query Constructed in 1449 and presented to King James II of Scotland in 1454, Mons Meg was used in both military and ceremonial roles in Scotland 11 bs_bs_query until its barrel burst in 1680. This paper examines the history, internal, external and terminal ballistics of the cannon and its shot. The likely muzzle 12bs_bs_query velocity was estimated by varying the propellant type and the cannon profile was investigated to identify weak spots in the design that may have 13bs_bs_query led to its failure. Using the muzzle velocity calculated from the internal ballistics, simulations were performed with granite and sandstone shot for 14bs_bs_query varying launch angle and ground temperature. The likely trajectory and range of the cannonballs are described. The internal and external ballistics 15bs_bs_query informed the initial conditions of the terminal ballistic impact scenarios. The performance of the cannonball against both period and modern 16bs_bs_query targets, in the form of a pseudo-castle wall and a monolithic concrete target, respectively, were simulated and are presented and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • La Mer D'eau Douce
    ROBERTO J. PAYRO LA MER D’EAU DOUCE XII ENTRE MER ET CIEL La journée était très belle, le vent favorable, la mer un immense manteau vert foncé ondulé par de légères et longues vagues. La proue orientée vers les Canaries, vers le sud-ouest, naviguant au large, le vent presque en poupe, on devait peu manoeuvrer sur les caravelles et l’équipage se reposait en profitant de la vie. Solís était descendu dans sa cabine, confiant le pont à son second, le pilote Juan de Lisboa (N.d.T. : Alvarez de Cartaya ; voir chapitre 10) ; dorénavant on allait peu le voir, si ce n’était à l’entrée et la sortie du port éventuel, lorsqu’il désirait prendre personnellement la direction et dans un cas difficile. Mais, matins et soirs, on allait l’entendre quotidiennement héler les capitaines des autres caravelles, commandées, l’une par Francisco de Torres, secondé par le quartier-maître Diego García de Moguer, et l’autre par le pilote Rodrigo Alvarez. Porte-voix à la main et, après avoir écouté ces capitaines, Juan Díaz de Solís donnait ses ordres : en général, ils consistaient simplement à continuer de cingler en naviguant de conserve durant le jour et, la nuit, à suivre la lanterne de la caravelle portugaise, qui dirigeait la marche. Dieu leur avait procuré la sécurité – comme disaient les Musulmans –, et les jours suivants furent semblables à ce 13 octobre 1515, premier jour de voyage en haute mer, avec du vent frais et des éclaircies telles que rien ne perturba jamais la tranquillité de la navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of CANNON in the CIVIL WAS with Particular Reference To
    The Use Of CANNON IN THE CIVIL WAS With Particular Reference to DERBYSHIRE by R. HAYHURST Published by the Local History Section of the DERBYSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Because of the interest occasioned by ray previous article, (DerbyshireMiscellanyVol.il No.6 p.318-9) and through the useful suggestions of members, I am encouraged to submit these notes, which I hope-will assist in clarifying the picture so far as the use of guns in Derbyshire is concerned. It appears desirable, in order to place the matter in its proper context, to review the situation generally, and to this end I have consulted various works, including the following, to which I am indebted for numerous extracts; Whitelock's Memorials, 1682; Rushworth's Collections, 1659-1701} "Cromwell's Army", by C . H. Firth, 1902} "Castles and Cannon", B. H. St. John O'Neill, "Life of Col. Hutchinson", Lucy Hutchinson} "Memoirs of the Duke of Newcastle", by Margaret, Duchess of Newcastle} "Derbyshire", Pilkington; "Waterloo", John Naylor, I960; and "The Story of the Gun", by Lt. A. W. Wilson, R.A., 1944* Firth quotes expensively from earlier writers, as "Animadversions of War", 1639, "Principles of the Art Military", 1643, etc. Appended to a particular edition of "The Life of Col. Hutchinson" is an excellent day to day account of the Siege of Lathom House. From the gunnery standpoint St. John O'Neill is disappointing, as buildings were his interest and he refers to the gun only insofar as it affects castles and fortifications. Generally there are masses of references to the use of guns, but only very infrequently does one find precise information as to range and effect, and the picture must be built up by extracting appropriate evidence from numerous actions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Medieval Or Early Modern Light Gun Barrel from the Castle Museum in Malbork—Typology, Technology of Manufacture and Identification of the Smelting Process
    Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (2019) 11:2007–2026 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0653-3 ORIGINAL PAPER A late medieval or early modern light gun barrel from the Castle Museum in Malbork—typology, technology of manufacture and identification of the smelting process Grzegorz Żabiński1 & Mateusz Biborski2 & Ewelina A. Miśta-Jakubowska3 Received: 9 February 2018 /Accepted: 3 May 2018 /Published online: 18 May 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract The paper discusses a gun barrel of a possibly late 15th-early 16th c. date from the collection of the Castle Museum in Malbork (Marienburg), Poland (MZM/468/MT). The barrel was originally part of a hand-held gun (a hackbut?) and was later converted into a light cannon. The barrel was made from unevenly carburised soft steel (c. 0.1–0.2% C). Both metallographic examinations and the analysis of slag inclusions with the use of multivariate statistics suggest that the metal in the barrel was manufactured using the direct (bloomery) smelting process. Keywords 15th–16th c. Military . Light artillery . Hand-held firearms . Hackbut . Castle Museum in Malbork . Archaeometallurgy . Archaeometry . Slag inclusion analysis . Multivariate statistics Introduction It is generally assumed that iron barrels of hand-held firearms were made by forge-welding one or several iron pieces on an iron The aim of this paper is to discuss an iron light cannon barrel core. The barrel was then stopped in the rear (breech) part with a from the collection of the Castle Museum in Malbork cylindrical peg. Hooks, if present, were then separately forge- (Marienburg), Poland (inv. No. MZM/468/MT).
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1
    Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1 Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy The Project Gutenberg EBook of Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Artillery Through the Ages A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Author: Albert Manucy Release Date: January 30, 2007 [EBook #20483] Language: English Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 2 Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES *** Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Christine P. Travers and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. -- Price 35 cents (Cover) FRENCH 12-POUNDER FIELD GUN (1700-1750) ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 3 by ALBERT MANUCY Historian Southeastern National Monuments Drawings by Author Technical Review by Harold L. Peterson National Park Service Interpretive Series History No. 3 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1949 (Reprint 1956) Many of the types of cannon described in this booklet may be seen in areas of the National Park System throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices of Weapons and Munitions in Early Sixteenth Century Holland During the Guelders War1
    James P. Ward Prices of Weapons and Munitions in Early Sixteenth Century Holland during the Guelders War1 1. Introduction The adage that to have peace one has to prepare for war may not be of Classical antiquity but the principle was known to Livy and the Ancients,2 and so the influence of the weapons industry on world peace and economy hardly needs to be emphasized now. The purpose of this article is both to present data on retail prices of individual weapons and munitions of war in the first decades of the sixteenth century in Holland, and to show how the magistrates there prepared to defend their cities against an aggressor by purchasing weapons to arm the citizens. Prices quoted here for strategic commodities of war in the early sixteenth century complement those given by Posthumus in his survey of prices for the later sixteenth century and beyond.3 Kuypers published inventories of weapons maintained in castles and elsewhere in Holland and the Netherlands in the first half of the sixteenth century, but the cities of Holland were not included in his descriptions.4 A recent study by De Jong reveals the growth of the early modern weapons industry in the Republic of the United Netherlands in the period 1585-1621 as part of a process of state formation based on entrepreneurship, economic growth and military reform.5 As sources for the present investigation accounts of the Treasurer for North-Holland at The Hague, and of the city treasurers of Haarlem, Leiden, Dordrecht and Gouda were examined for expenditures on weapons and munitions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ballistic Performance of the Bombard Mons
    HOSTED BY Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Defence Technology 12 (2016) 59–68 www.elsevier.com/locate/dt The ballistic performance of the bombard Mons Meg Ian LEWTAS, Rachael MCALISTER *, Adam WALLIS, Clive WOODLEY, Ian CULLIS QinetiQ, Fort Halstead, Sevenoaks, Kent T N14 7BP, UK Received 28 September 2015; revised 30 November 2015; accepted 1 December 2015 Available online 23 December 2015 Abstract The bombard Mons Meg, located in Edinburgh Castle, with a diameter of 19 inches (48 cm), was one of the largest calibre cannons ever built. Constructed in 1449 and presented to King James II of Scotland in 1454, Mons Meg was used in both military and ceremonial roles in Scotland until its barrel burst in 1680. This paper examines the history, internal, external and terminal ballistics of the cannon and its shot. The likely muzzle velocity was estimated by varying the propellant type and the cannon profile was investigated to identify weak spots in the design that may have led to its failure. Using the muzzle velocity calculated from the internal ballistics, simulations were performed with granite and sandstone shot for varying launch angle and ground temperature. The likely trajectory and range of the cannonballs are described. The internal and external ballistics informed the initial conditions of the terminal ballistic impact scenarios. The performance of the cannonball against both period and modern targets, in the form of a pseudo-castle wall and a monolithic concrete target, respectively, were simulated and are presented and discussed. © 2016 China Ordnance Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Castle: Mons Meg
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC 222 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90130) Taken into State care: 1906 (Ownership) Last reviewed: 2012 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE EDINBURGH CASTLE: MONS MEG We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH EDINBURGH CASTLE: MONS MEG Note: this statement is one of a series providing a more detailed individual assessment of the significance of particular components of the Edinburgh Castle property in care. Like the others, it should be read in conjunction with the Edinburgh Castle Overview Statement of Significance which provides its wider context and sketches the relationships between various parts of the Castle site. BRIEF DESCRIPTION Mons Meg is one of the oldest surviving pieces of gun-powdered artillery in the world, and probably the most famous example in the United Kingdom. The iron cannon, a form of medieval siege gun known as a bombard, was forged in Mons (modern Belgium) in 1449 and presented by Duke Philip of Burgundy to James II in 1457. Known then simply as 'Mons', the 6-tonne gun was at the leading edge of artillery technology of its day, firing huge gun-stones a distance of almost two miles. By the mid-16th century, however, Mons Meg was obsolete as a field gun and had become a ceremonial gun, firing 'feux de joie' on important national occasions; recorded salutes included celebrating Queen Mary's marriage to the French dauphin in 1558.
    [Show full text]
  • Guns for the Sultan: Military Power and the Weapons Industry in the Ottoman Empire Gabor Agoston Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521843138 - Guns for the Sultan: Military Power and the Weapons Industry in the Ottoman Empire Gabor Agoston Index More information Index Abbreviations: A. Albanian, Ar. Arabic, B. Bulgarian, G. German, Gr. Greek, H. Hungarian, It. Italian, O. Ottoman, P. Polish, R. Russian, S. Southern Slav/general Slavonic, Sl. Slovak, T. Turkish Abbas I (Safavid Shah 1587–1629) 58, 149 Ali Kulu 194 Abd¨ulkadªrEfendi 85, 147 Ali Raik Efendi, Tevkii 161 Abd¨ulkerim (muderris¨ and entrepreneur) Ali Reis (renegade from L¨ubeck) 55 107 ammunition 48 Abyssinia 194 amphibious warfare, see warfare acemi oglan˘ 30 Anadolu, province of 113 admirals, see kapudan Anatolia 27, 137, 172 Adriatic Sea 49, 55, 200 Angiolello, Giovan-Maria 66 map of 43 Antakya, kaza of 99 Afghanistan 15 Arabia, Arab provinces 95, 96, 99, 146, agribar˘ (grippa, small Ottoman vessel) 49, 53, 200 85 Arabic chroniclers, on firearms 15 Agricola, Georgius 100 arabaciyan-i top, see top arabacªlarª Agustos˘ (S. Njegus)ˇ 98 Arakil (Erakil) Efendi 162 kaza of 120 Archipelago 55 Ahmed C¸ avus¸ 106–07, 112 province of 52 Ahmed Efendi 141 archives, Ottoman 13–14 Ahmed Pasha, see Humbaracª Ahmed Pasha armaments industry 1–3, 96 Ahmed Pasha, K¨opr¨ul¨uzadeFazil 201 in Spain 125 Ahmed Pasha, Gedik 49, 67 see also weapons industry Ahmed Pasha, Hain 146 Armenia, Armenians, resettlement Ahtamar, kaza of 99 of 44 Ahtar 150 sappers 40, 42, 48 Akdag,˘ kaza of 116 armies, Ottoman 21–42 Akkirman (S. Bielgorod) 77 Habsburg 23 Akkoyunlu 58 Spanish in Flanders 25 Aksaray, sancak of 98 armorers 29–30, see also cebeci Aksehir,¸ sancak of 98 armory, see Cebehane Alacahisar (S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Copper Alloy Light Cannon from Grodno: an Example of Early
    Żabiński et al. Herit Sci (2021) 9:67 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00534-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access A copper alloy light cannon from Grodno: an example of early frearms from Eastern Europe Grzegorz Żabiński1* , Piotr Strzyż2 , Tomasz Goryczka3 , Krzysztof Aniołek3 and Ewelina Miśta‑Jakubowska4 Abstract The paper discusses a recent fnd of a copper alloy light cannon discovered at the Old Castle in Grodno, Belarus. The research aim was to analyse the artefact in all its possible aspects, including archaeological and historical contexts, possible analogies, and the gun’s technology of manufacture. This latter was done against a broad comparative back‑ ground of what is known on manufacturing technologies of late medieval and modern period copper alloy frearms. First, the archaeological and historical contexts of the discovery are dealt with. Then, the morphology and typochro‑ nology of the cannon are discussed and relevant analogies are proposed. Next, the technology of manufacture of the cannon is studied on the basis of metallographic examinations and EDS analyses of the metal’s elemental composi‑ tion. It was found out that the artefact had been made of leaded copper. The cannon can be dated with reasonable certainty to the late 14th c., as implied both by the fnd context, the morphology and the chemical composition of the artefact. Its deposition can be related to fghts over the Old Castle in Grodno in this period, waged by Teutonic, Polish and Lithuanian forces. It can tentatively be proposed that the cannon was manufactured in a Teutonic Order’s workshop, but further research is necessary to verify this supposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Nieuw Historisch Onderzoek Van De Dulle Griet Bombarde in Gent
    NIEUW HISTORISCH ONDERZOEK VAN DE DULLE GRIET BOMBARDE IN GENT Door Marc Beyaert 1. Betekenis Hoewel het Groot Kanon deel uitmaakt van het vertrouwde Gentse straatbeeld en heel wat stadsgenoten bezorgd waren toen ze voor restauratie tijdelijk ver­ wijderd werd, was en is deze bombarde voor het grote publiek een volslagen onbe~ende. Zelfs eminente historici bleken van ons militair-technisch verle­ den vaak een foute voorstelling te hebben. Ze hebben deze met hun gezag­ hebbende publicaties generaties lang verder doorgegeven : had Henri Pirenne het, in een legende bij een foto van het Groot Kanon, niet over een gegoten donderbus van meer dan 6 m lang, die behalve met stenen, ook met ijzer­ schroot en glas werd geladen 1 ? Samen met een bepaalde antimilitaristische vooringenomenheid- nog versterkt sinds mei 1968 -, zorgde de onwetendheid op dit terrein voor een blijvende verwaarlozing van het militair-technisch patrimonium2. Geleidelijk groeide echter het besef dat het militaire gebeuren een zeer belangrijk aandeel had, niet enkel in de algemeen historische, maar vooral ook in de economische, sociale, technologische en zelfs filosofische evolutie. Over de volledige evolutie van de buskruitartillerie3 beschouwd - van haar prilste begin in Europa bij de aanvang van de 14e eeuw tot de grote innova­ ties halverwege de 19e eeuw - is het smeedijzeren Groot Kanon of de Dulle Griet, met haar to tale lengte4 van 5, 031 mm, haar actueel nettogewicht van 12.250 kg en haar «kaliber»S van 640 mm, de grootste vuurmond van wester­ se makelij, die uit deze lange periode bewaard is gebleven. De Russische giet- PIRENNE H., Geschiedenis van Belgie, dl.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Castle's Role As a Gun House
    EDINBURGH CASTLE RESEARCH: EDINBURGH CASTLE’S ROLE AS A GUN HOUSE EDINBURGH CASTLE’S ROLE AS A GUN HOUSE David H. Caldwell In a series of questions and answers, this report seeks to provide an overview of the gunnery establishment, arsenal and gun house based in Edinburgh Castle, particularly in the late 15th and 16th centuries. It provides detailed information on Mons Meg, the gun carvings in the gatehouse to the castle, gun casting and the use of guns on ships. Two Appendices provide information on gun specifications and a list of gunnery personnel. How the Master Melter, Robert Borthwick left his name on a bell of 1528 in Kirkwall’s cathedral Q. What is the earliest evidence for guns in the castle? A. 1384. In that year saltpetre and sulphur – with charcoal, the ingredients of gunpowder – were bought by the government for the royal castles, and also an instrument called a gun, specifically for Edinburgh Castle (ER 3: 672). There can be no doubt that this was a gun in the sense of a military machine projecting pieces of shot. There were already two specialists based in the castle who may have had appropriate knowledge and experience to look after and use this weapon. One was Theoderic or Dederik, probably of Flemish or German origin, a carpenter and maker of machines; the other an unnamed artilarius, in this context meaning a keeper of crossbows and other engines (ER 3: 87, 117, 118, 659, 660). The Scots must have been aware of this new technology long before 1384, having guns fired against them by the English as early as 1327 when 1 campaigning in Weardale in the north of England.
    [Show full text]