Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years Full Name Ballot Name
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Your Enrollment As a Voter
YOUR ENROLLMENT AS A VOTER When you register to vote, you may choose to enroll in a political party or political designation or may choose to remain “unenrolled,” which is commonly referred to as independent. Choosing to Enroll in a Political Party: There are two political parties in Massachusetts: Democratic Party (D), (617) 776-2676 Republican Party (R), (617) 523-5005 If you enroll in either of these two parties you may vote only in that party’s primary. Enrollment in a political party does not affect your right to vote in the general election. In the general election, all voters receive the same ballot and vote for the candidate of their choice, regardless of party enrollment. Choosing No Enrollment in a Political Party: If you do not wish to enroll in a party, check the box next to “No Party (unenrolled)” on the voter registration form. If you do not enroll in a party, you may still vote in state and presidential primaries by choosing a party ballot and will remain unenrolled, which is commonly referred to as “independent.” Choosing to Enroll in a Political Designation: In addition to the two “political parties” listed above, there are certain legal political designations in which you can enroll. Currently these are: Conservative Party (A) Prohibition Party (P) Natural Law Party (B) American Independent Party (Q) New World Council (C) Socialist (S) Reform Party (E) Interdependent 3rd Party (T) Rainbow Coalition (F) America First Party (V) Green Party USA (G) Veterans Party America (W) We the People (H) Pirate (X) Constitution Party (K) World Citizens Party (Y) Green-Rainbow (J) Working Families (Z) Libertarian Party (L) Pizza Party (AA) Timesizing Not Downsizing (M) American Term Limits (BB) New Alliance Party (N) United Independent Party (CC) Massachusetts Independent Party (O) If you enroll in any political designation you may not vote in any state or presidential primary. -
The Emergence of Parties in the Canadian House of Commons (1867-1908)
The Emergence of Parties in the Canadian House of Commons (1867-1908). Jean-Fran¸coisGodbouty and Bjørn Høylandz y D´epartement de science polititque, Universit´ede Montr´eal zDepartment of Political Science, University of Oslo Conference on the Westminster Model of Democracy in Crisis? Comparative Perspectives on Origins, Development and Responses, May 13-14, 2013. Abstract This study analyzes legislative voting in the first ten Canadian Parliaments (1867-1908). The results demonstrate that party voting unity in the House of Commons dramati- cally increases over time. From the comparative literature on legislative organization, we identify three factors to explain this trend: partisan sorting; electoral incentives; and negative agenda control. Several different empirical analyses confirm that intra-party conflict is generally explained by the opposition between Anglo-Celtic/Protestants and French/Catholic Members of Parliament. Once members begin to sort into parties according to their religious affiliation, we observe a sharp increase in voting cohesion within the Liberal and Conservative parties. Ultimately, these finding highlight the importance of territorial and socio-cultural conflicts, as well as agenda control, in ex- plaining the emergence of parties as cohesive voting groups in the Canadian Parliament. This study explains the development of party unity in the Canadian House of Commons. We take advantage of the historical evolution of this legislature to analyze a complete set of recorded votes covering the first ten parliaments (1867-1908). This early period is of interest because it was during these years that the first national party system was established, the electoral franchise was limited, and the rules and procedures of the House were kept to a minimum. -
What Is the Purpose of the Student Vote Program? Why Is It Important to Encourage Family Discussion? What Is Student Vote Day?
Intermediate/Secondary Resource Dear Educator, We would like to thank you for accepting this important responsibility of bringing democracy and citizenship education into your classroom. By introducing your students to the habits of citizenship, you are making an extremely worthwhile contribution to our democracy. Your enthusiasm toward special initiatives such as the Student Vote program provides an example to students (and their families) that caring about their democracy is an important and worthwhile effort. What is the purpose of the Student Vote program? The Student Vote program provides young Canadians with an opportunity to experience the democratic process firsthand and practice the habits of informed and engaged citizenship. The Student Vote program applies the concept of the ‘teachable moment’ using the official election as a backdrop to the parallel election. By matching real life events with school life, this exercise can motivate your students into becoming informed and active citizens. Our hope is that through your instruction students will enter as citizens into the community with knowledge, understanding and a sense of empowerment. Through the campaign activities and resulting vote, we look forward to inspiring a conversation about civic responsibility in your class and at home. Why is it important to encourage family discussion? Based on feedback from past programs, we know that students are eager to share their knowledge with family and friends, engaging them in conversation about the election. This family exchange allows students to explore different points of view and further develop habits of informed citizenship. Discuss ideas with your students that may encourage ‘democracy at the dinner table’ as take home assignments. -
CP's North American Rail
2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR -
House of Representatives By-Elections 1901–2014
RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2017–18 5 MARCH 2018 House of Representatives by-elections: 1901–2017 Stephen Barber Statistics and Mapping Section Executive summary This paper provides details of House of Representatives by-elections, from that held for Darling Downs on 14 September 1901 to the most recent held on 16 December 2017 for Bennelong. The following observations can be made about those by-elections: • there have been 151 by-elections, an average of 3.4 per parliament • the average number of nominations has grown over the years from 2.2 per by-election to 12.0 per by- election • in only four cases was a by-election contested by just a single candidate • an increasing tendency has been for governments to avoid contesting by-elections in their opponents’ safe seats • in only ten cases have the opposition party failed to contest a by-election • seventy-six of the by-elections followed the resignation of the member, 68 members died in office, there have been six voided elections, and one MP was expelled from the House • since 1949 resignations account for almost two-thirds of by-elections and over half the resignations have occurred in safe seats • on 35 occasions the party complexion of a seat has altered at a by-election • five of the losses have been by the opposition of the day • the average two-party preferred swing against the government of the day has been 3.8 per cent • since 1949 the largest two-party swing against a government occurred against Labor in Canberra in 1995. The largest swing to a government occurred to the Coalition in McPherson in 1981. -
1 Separatism in Quebec
1 Separatism in Quebec: Off the Agenda but Not Off the Minds of Francophones An Honors Thesis Submitted to the Department of Politics in Partial Fulfillment of the Honors Program By Sarah Weber 5/6/15 2 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 3 Chapter 2. 4 Chapter 3. 17 Chapter 4. 36 Chapter 5. 41 Chapter 6. 50 Chapter 7. Conclusion 65 3 Chapter 1: Introduction-The Future of Quebec The Quebec separatist movement has been debated for decades and yet no one can seem to come to a conclusion regarding what the future of the province holds for the Quebecers. This thesis aims to look at the reasons for the Quebec separatist movement occurring in the past as well as its steady level of support. Ultimately, there is a split within the recent literature in Quebec, regarding those who believe that independence is off the political agenda and those who think it is back on the agenda. This thesis looks at public opinion polls, and electoral returns, to find that the independence movement is ultimately off the political agenda as of the April 2014 election, but continues to be supported in Quebec public opinion. I will first be analyzing the history of Quebec as well as the theories other social scientists have put forward regarding separatist and nationalist movements in general. Next I will be analyzing the history of Quebec in order to understand why the Quebec separatist movement came about. I will then look at election data from 1995-2012 in order to identify the level of electoral support for separatism as indicated by the vote for the Parti Quebecois (PQ). -
Reviews / Comptes Rendus
REVIEWS / COMPTES RENDUS Ben Swankey, What’s New: Memoirs of the need for more exploration of conse- a Socialist Idealist (Victoria, BC: Trafford quences. Swankey is a great advocate of Publishing 2008) left-wing unity, and speaks with pride of his success, as Alberta Young Com- Ben Swankey is a charter member of munist League leader in the mid-1930s, that heroic generation that built the in forging a united front with the social Communist Party of Canada, sustained democratic Cooperative Commonwealth it through the grueling days of the Great Federation Youth Movement. But while Depression, stuck with it on the roller- Swankey mentions that the ccym was coaster of World War II, and persisted “the junior section of the United Farm- through the even more desperate Cold ers of Alberta,” (85) and that the rcmp’s War era. Swankey and other devoted violent suppression of the 1932 Hunger members then watched, with greater or March came “on the authority of the ufa lesser cognizance of what was happening government,” (59) he doesn’t tease this and why, the daring project turn to dust out to speak to the larger question of the and virtually disappear by the 1990s. Communist Party’s “Third Period” politi- Swankey joined the party (via the cal strategy. Too often it is the commu- Young Communist League) in 1932 and, nists who are condemned for sectarian despite occasional doubts about its spe- prejudice against socialist democrats in cific policies, remained in it for the next the years 1928 to 1935. Swankey himself 59 years, rising to the position of Alberta implicitly supports this argument. -
Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As Of: September 25, 2021
Page 1 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 25, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names Advocational International Democratic Advocational Party AID Party Party of British Columbia Advocates Advocational Democrats Advocational International Democratic Party Advocational International Democratic Party of BC Advocational Party of BC Advocational Party of British Columbia Democratic Advocates International Advocates B.C. New Republican Party Republican Party B.C. Vision B.C. Vision B.C. Vision Party BCV British Columbia Vision BC Citizens First Party BC Citizens First Party British Columbia Citizens First Party BC Ecosocialists BC Ecosocialists BC Eco-Socialists BC EcoSocialists BC Ecosocialist Alliance BC Ecosocialist Party BC First Party BC First BC Marijuana Party BC Marijuana Party British Columbia Marijuana Party Page 2 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 25, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names BC NDP BC NDP BC New Democratic Party BC New Democrats British Columbia New Democratic Party Formerly known as: New Democratic Party of B.C. NDP New Democratic Party New Democrats BC Progressive Party Pro BC BC Progressives Progressive Party BC Refederation Party BC Refed Formerly known as: Western Independence Party Formerly known as: Western Refederation Party of BC British Columbia Action Party BC Action Party BCAP British Columbia Direct Democracy British Columbia Direct BC Direct Party Democracy Party BC Direct Democracy Party Direct Democracy British Columbia Excalibur Party BC Excalibur Party British Columbia Liberal Party BC Liberal Party British Columbia Libertarian Party Libertarian Libertarian Party of BC British Columbia Party British Columbia Party BC Party BCP British Columbia Patriot Party B.C. -
Calgary City 1988 Sept V to We
V I P Courier Systems Ltd 752 Vadorin Serge 907 4istsw 249-0675 VALENTINA HAUTE COUTURE 208 2835 23StNE 250-7900 Vadura J 266-1291 u Urton—Vallat V I P Garments Of Canada 248-4007 1822 2stsw- 244-5334 Vagabond Trailer Court Valentine A 1235 73AveSW 252-6543 V I P JANITORIAL SERVICES 37 4501 17AvSE 272-3668 Urton S 3517 49StSW 246-4655 Valentine A Elgin LTD 293-5790 Vagho R 609 1028 15AvSW 229-1193 143 llllGlenmoreTrSW 252-0595 Uruald Bradley I 524 50FrobisherBlvdSE 255-1024 V I P RESERVATIONS (1984)INC Vaheesan Ram 1263RanchviewRdNW .. 239-2578 Uruski Darreii 211QtjeenChar1ottePtaceSE 271-6758 Valentine C Peter 3012 istsw 243-5437 10Flrll22 4StSW 269-3566 Vahey Kevin 208 1431 37Stsw 249-3882 Valentine C Peter 3012 istsw 287-2255 Urvald Roy 105 2511 l7StSW 245-5425 Vaiasicca Gaetano 2124 29AvSW .... 244-0197 Urvald Steve 163-OgdenRiseSE 236-5303 V I P C 0 3230 58AVSE 279-7501 Valentine D 79VenturaRdNE 291-1374 Vaid C Bsmtl9FalwoodWyNE 280-4525 Valentine D 2848 63AveSW 249-0746 Urwin James 804 2105 90AvSW 281-4563 V J PAMENSKY CANADA INC Vaidya M 11023BraesideDrSW 252-0056 415ManitouRdSE 263-2626 Valentine David 3608 825 8AvSW.... 262-9537 Urynowicz Tadeusz i52Run<jiecaimRdNE 285-7221 Vail A E 320GlamorganPlaceSW 246-5509 Valentine E J 3408LakeCrtSW 249-8832 V J R Jewellers 4012 17AvSE 273-0552 Urysz M 264EdgebumLaneNW ... u 239-4815 Vail Doug 3715 40Stsw 246-3151 Valentine J 285-6852 Urysz Steve 2413 182SWoodviewDrSW 281-5304 V K 0 Management Ltd Vail Harold C 12WhitmanCrNE 280-3000 Valentine J 220PenbrookeWySE 235-6039 Urzada L 1908 62AveSE -
Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As Of: September 24, 2021
Page 1 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 24, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names Advocational International Democratic Advocational Party AID Party Party of British Columbia Advocates Advocational Democrats Advocational International Democratic Party Advocational International Democratic Party of BC Advocational Party of BC Advocational Party of British Columbia Democratic Advocates International Advocates B.C. New Republican Party Republican Party B.C. Vision B.C. Vision B.C. Vision Party BCV British Columbia Vision BC Citizens First Party BC Citizens First Party British Columbia Citizens First Party BC Ecosocialists BC Ecosocialists BC Eco-Socialists BC EcoSocialists BC Ecosocialist Alliance BC Ecosocialist Party BC First Party BC First BC Marijuana Party BC Marijuana Party British Columbia Marijuana Party Page 2 of 6 Political Party Names Used in the Last 10 Years As of: September 24, 2021 Party Name Ballot Name Other Names BC NDP BC NDP BC New Democratic Party BC New Democrats British Columbia New Democratic Party Formerly known as: New Democratic Party of B.C. NDP New Democratic Party New Democrats BC Progressive Party Pro BC BC Progressives Progressive Party BC Refederation Party BC Refed Formerly known as: Western Independence Party Formerly known as: Western Refederation Party of BC British Columbia Action Party BC Action Party BCAP British Columbia Direct Democracy British Columbia Direct BC Direct Party Democracy Party BC Direct Democracy Party Direct Democracy British Columbia Excalibur Party BC Excalibur Party British Columbia Liberal Party BC Liberal Party British Columbia Libertarian Party Libertarian Libertarian Party of BC British Columbia Party British Columbia Party BC Party BCP British Columbia Patriot Party B.C. -
THE AMERICAN IMPRINT on ALBERTA POLITICS Nelson Wiseman University of Toronto
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Winter 2011 THE AMERICAN IMPRINT ON ALBERTA POLITICS Nelson Wiseman University of Toronto Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the American Studies Commons, Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons Wiseman, Nelson, "THE AMERICAN IMPRINT ON ALBERTA POLITICS" (2011). Great Plains Quarterly. 2657. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/2657 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE AMERICAN IMPRINT ON ALBERTA POLITICS NELSON WISEMAN Characteristics assigned to America's clas the liberal society in Tocqueville's Democracy sical liberal ideology-rugged individualism, in America: high status was accorded the self market capitalism, egalitarianism in the sense made man, laissez-faire defined the economic of equality of opportunity, and fierce hostility order, and a multiplicity of religious sects com toward centralized federalism and socialism peted in the market for salvation.l Secondary are particularly appropriate for fathoming sources hint at this thesis in their reading of Alberta's political culture. In this article, I the papers of organizations such as the United contend that Alberta's early American settlers Farmers of Alberta (UFA) and Alberta's were pivotal in shaping Alberta's political cul Social Credit Party.2 This article teases out its ture and that Albertans have demonstrated a hypothesis from such secondary sources and particular affinity for American political ideas covers new ground in linking the influence and movements. -
The Politico's Guide to Electoral Reform in Britain
Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir The Politico's guide to electoral reform in Britain Book section Original citation: Originally published in Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen and Weir, Stuart (1998) The Politico's guide to electoral reform in Britain. Politico's Publishing, London, UK. ISBN 190230120X © Democratic Audit This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/62253/ Available in LSE Research Online: June 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. the Guide to ELECTORAL REFORM in Britain Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir First published in Great Britain 1998 by Politico’s Publishing 8 Artillery Row London SW1P 1RZ England Telephone 0171 931 0090 Email [email protected] Website http://www.politicos.co.uk Copyright Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir 1998 The right of Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British library ISBN 190230120X Printed and bound in Great Britain by Colourworks Typesetting and cover design by Tony Garrett All rights reserved.