DOCSLIB.ORG

Lessons from the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lessons from the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence Greater Christchurch Group Whole of Government Report Lessons from the Canterbury earthquake sequence 1 Contents 1. Minister’s Foreword ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Summary of the chapters .................................................................................................................................. 6 3. Context ..................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1. The Canterbury earthquake sequence ............................................................................................................ 13 3.2. Value of identifying lessons ............................................................................................................................. 14 4. Methodological Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 14 5. Recovery Governance Arrangements ..................................................................................................................... 16 5.1. Context .............................................................................................................................................................. 16 5.1.1. Civil defence emergency management framework ................................................................................ 16 5.1.2. Local governance in Canterbury .............................................................................................................. 18 5.2. Findings ............................................................................................................................................................. 18 5.3. Governance arrangements after the 4 September 2010 earthquake .......................................................... 19 5.3.1. Civil Defence Emergency Management response and early recovery .................................................. 19 5.3.2. Establishment of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Commission ................................................... 19 5.3.3. Challenges with the governance arrangements after 4 September 2010 ............................................ 20 5.4. Governance arrangements after the 22 February 2011 earthquake ............................................................ 20 5.4.1. Civil Defence Emergency Management response and early recovery .................................................. 20 5.4.2. Establishment of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority ........................................................ 21 5.4.3. Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority’s roles and responsibilities .............................................. 22 5.4.4. Setting up from scratch ............................................................................................................................ 24 5.5. Ensuring collaboration across the recovery sector ........................................................................................ 24 5.5.1. Working with recovery partners .............................................................................................................. 24 5.5.2. Confusion and tensions about roles and responsibilities ....................................................................... 26 5.6. Public participation and community engagement ......................................................................................... 27 5.6.1. Engagement on the Recovery Strategy ................................................................................................... 27 5.6.2. Engagement on the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan ....................................................................... 29 5.7. Transition to new governance arrangements ................................................................................................ 32 5.7.1. Development of a plan for transition ...................................................................................................... 32 5.7.2. Moving into the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet ......................................................... 32 5.7.3. Disestablishment of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority................................................... 33 5.7.4. Governance arrangements 2016-2021 ................................................................................................... 33 5.8. Effectiveness of the governance arrangements ............................................................................................. 34 5.8.1. New Zealand’s governance arrangements in the international context ............................................... 34 5.8.2. Public perception of effectiveness .......................................................................................................... 35 5.9. Summary of lessons on Recovery Governance Arrangements ...................................................................... 36 6. Recovery Legislation ................................................................................................................................................ 38 2 6.1. Context .............................................................................................................................................................. 38 6.1.1. Canterbury Earthquake Response and Recovery Act 2010 .................................................................... 38 6.2. Findings ............................................................................................................................................................. 38 6.3. The Effectiveness of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 ........................................................... 39 6.3.1. The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 ..................................................................................... 39 6.3.2. Overall operation of the Act .................................................................................................................... 40 6.3.3. Input into decision-making under the Act ............................................................................................... 41 6.4. Special Powers under the Act .......................................................................................................................... 43 6.4.1. General use of the special powers .......................................................................................................... 44 6.4.2. Use of the power to amend other legislation (Orders in Council) ......................................................... 44 6.4.3. Challenges to the use of special powers in the Act and decision-making ............................................. 47 6.5. Summary of Lessons on Recovery Legislation ................................................................................................ 48 7. Land Decisions .......................................................................................................................................................... 49 7.1. Context .............................................................................................................................................................. 49 7.2. Findings ............................................................................................................................................................. 50 7.3. Land Zoning Decisions ...................................................................................................................................... 50 7.3.1. Assessing the Damage .............................................................................................................................. 50 7.3.2. Developing options for damaged land .................................................................................................... 50 7.3.3. Initial land zoning decisions ..................................................................................................................... 51 7.3.4. Review of ‘flat land’ zoning decisions ...................................................................................................... 53 7.3.5. Land zoning decisions in the Port Hills .................................................................................................... 53 7.4. Offers to Purchase Properties in the Most Damaged Areas .......................................................................... 54 7.4.1. Insured red zone properties..................................................................................................................... 54 7.4.3. Vacant, Insured commercial and uninsured improved red zone properties ........................................ 58 7.4.4. Rāpaki red zone properties and Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 ....................................................... 60 7.4.5. Management of red zone land ................................................................................................................ 60 7.5. Summary of Lessons on Land Decisions .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaiapoi Street Map
    Kaiapoi Street Map www.northcanterbury.co.nz www.visitwaimakariri.co.nz 5 19 To Woodend, Kaikoura and Picton North To Rangiora T S S M A I L L I W 2 D R E 62 D I S M A C 29 54 E V A 64 E To Pines, O H and Kairaki 52 U T 39 45 4 57 44 10 7 63 46 47 30 8 32 59 9 38 33 24 65 11 37 66 48 18 16 23 61 26 20 17 27 25 49 13 58 14 12 28 21 51 15 22 31 41 56 50 55 3 1 35 Sponsored by 36 JIM BRYDEN RESERVE LICENSED AGENT REAA 2008 To Christchurch Harcourts Twiss-Keir Realty Ltd. 6 MREINZ Licensed Agent REAA 2008. Phone: 03 327 5379 Email: [email protected] Web: www.twisskeir.co.nz 40 60 © Copyright Enterprise North Canterbury 2016 For information and bookings contact Kaiapoi i-SITE Visitor Centre Kaiapoi Street and Information Index Phone 03 327 3134 Adams Street C5 Cressy Ave F3 Lees Rd A5 Sneyd St F2 Accommodation Attractions Adderley Tce E2 Cridland St E4 Lower Camside Rd B4 Sovereign Bvd C5 1 H3 Blue Skies Holiday & Conference Park 32 F4 Kaiapoi Historic Railway Station Akaroa St G3 Cumberland Pl H2 Magnate Dr C5 Stark Pl D5 2 C4 Grenmora B & B 55 Old North Rd 33 F4 Kaiapoi Museum And Art Gallery Aldersgate St G2 Dale St D4 Magnolia Bvd D5 Sterling Cres C5 3 H3 Kaiapoi on Williams Motel 35 H3 National Scout Museum Alexander Ln F3 Davie St F4 Main Drain Rd D1 Stone St H4 64 F6 Kairaki Beach Cottage 36 H5 Woodford Glen Speedway Allison Cres D5 Dawson Douglas Pl G4 Main North Rd I3 Storer St F1 4 F3 Morichele B & B Alpine Ln F3 Day Pl F5 Mansfield Dr G3 Sutherland Dr C6 5 A5 Pine Acres Holiday Park & Motels Recreation Ansel Pl D5 Doubledays
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Response to the February 22 Christchurch Earthquake
    Public Health Response to the February 22 Christchurch Earthquake Progress Report Rebecca Dell Public Health Medicine Registrar Daniel Williams Medical Officer of Health, Incident Controller 30 March 2011 CONTENTS 1. Abbreviations 3 2. Background 3 3. Intelligence 4 4. Communications 6 5. Liaison 7 6. Operations 9 a. CPH Emergency Operations Centre 9 b. Water quality and technical advice 9 c. Welfare centres 11 d. Outbreak control 12 e. Community Welfare Recovery 12 f. Health In All Policies 13 7. Logistics 13 a. Staff 13 b. Building 14 c. Equipment 14 d. Staff welfare 14 8. Recovery 15 9. Assessment 17 10. Appendices 18 Appendix 1 Intelligence and surveillance inputs for earthquake response 18 Appendix 2 Enteric disease notifications for Canterbury 23 Appendix 3 E. coli transgressions mapping 26 Appendix 4 Free Associated Chlorine concentration mapping 28 Appendix 5 Enteric disease Episurv notifications by census area unit 29 Appendix 6 Campylobacter notifications following 22 February 30 Appendix 7 Draft results for Wave 1 of Christchurch Health Survey 31 Appendix 8 Latest public health key messages 45 Appendix 9 Public health guidelines for reopening of schools and early childhood centres 46 Appendix 10 Public health advice for early childhood centres 48 Appendix 11 Public health advice about asbestos dust 49 Appendix 12 Health Assessment Form for Welfare Centres 51 Page 2 of 54 1. ABBREVIATIONS CCC Christchurch City Council CDHB Canterbury District Health Board CPH Community and Public Health (public health division of CDHB) ECC Emergency Co-ordination Centre (at Christchurch Art Gallery) EOC Emergency Operations Centre EQRC Earthquake Recovery Centre (Civil Defence recovery phase at Christchurch Art Gallery HPO Health Protection Officer MOH Medical Officer of Health NZFSA New Zealand Food Safety Authority PHS Public Health South (Southern District Health Board) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 1000 Searches in Google New Zealand
    Top 1000 Searches in Google New Zealand https://www.iconicfreelancer.com/top-1000-google-new-zealand/ # Keyword Volume 1 facebook 3370000 2 youtube 2890000 3 stuff 2320000 4 gmail 1880000 5 trade me 1810000 6 pornhub 1570000 7 nz herald 1210000 8 google 1150000 9 netflix 1020000 10 trademe 995000 11 hotmail 991000 12 the warehouse 757000 13 anz 739000 14 noel leeming 569000 15 google translate 547000 16 facebook login 546000 17 porn 540000 18 warehouse 540000 19 kiwibank 536000 20 google maps 532000 21 countdown 522000 22 kmart 496000 23 translate 496000 24 bunnings 480000 25 ird 479000 26 roblox 475000 27 briscoes 467000 28 metservice 462000 29 westpac 456000 30 asb 451000 31 mitre 10 423000 32 harvey norman 423000 33 calculator 416000 34 farmers 406000 35 yahoo mail 405000 36 instagram 389000 37 yt 366000 38 weather 355000 39 tvnz on demand 350000 40 xnxx 350000 41 maps 349000 42 news 348000 43 lotto nz 344000 44 auckland weather 341000 45 pb tech 330000 46 you tube 325000 47 cnn 324000 48 fb 324000 49 trump 319000 50 amazon 313000 51 google docs 308000 52 us election 301000 53 air new zealand 300000 54 nzherald 299000 55 nba 299000 56 lotto 296000 57 mylotto 289000 58 bnz 288000 59 bbc news 276000 60 countdown online 272000 61 usd to nzd 270000 62 aliexpress 267000 63 mighty ape 267000 64 outlook 266000 65 xvideos 265000 66 google classroom 263000 67 xhamster 249000 68 reddit 240000 69 warehouse stationery 239000 70 my lotto 238000 71 newshub 238000 72 ebay 236000 73 speed test 232000 74 dominos 232000 75 seek 227000 76 google drive
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism
    UNSETTLING RECOVERY: NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AND THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY SETTLER COLONIALISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY STEVEN ANDREW KENSINGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, ADVISER JULY 2019 Steven Andrew Kensinger, 2019 © Acknowledgements The fieldwork on which this dissertation is based was funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Fieldwork Grant No. 8955 awarded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. I also want to thank Dr. Robert Berdahl and the Berdahl family for endowing the Daphne Berdahl Memorial Fellowship which provided funds for two preliminary fieldtrips to New Zealand in preparation for the longer fieldwork period. I also received funding while in the field from the University of Minnesota Graduate School through a Thesis Research Travel Grant. I want to thank my advisor, Dr. David Lipset, and the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Hoon Song, Dr. David Valentine, and Dr. Margaret Werry for their help and guidance in preparing the dissertation. In the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota, Dr. William Beeman, Dr. Karen Ho, and Dr. Karen-Sue Taussig offered personal and professional support. I am grateful to Dr. Kieran McNulty for offering me a much-needed funding opportunity in the final stages of dissertation writing. A special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Meryl Puetz-Lauer and Dr. Timothy Gitzen for their support and encouragement. Dr. Carol Lauer graciously offered to read and comment on several of the chapters. My fellow graduate students and writing-accountability partners Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/18/35/Add.4 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/18/35/Add.4 General Assembly Distr.: General 31 May 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council Eighteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, James Anaya Addendum The situation of Maori people in New Zealand∗ Summary In the present report, which has been updated since the advance unedited version was made public on 17 February 2011, the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples examines the situation of Maori people in New Zealand on the basis of information received during his visit to the country from 18-23 July 2010 and independent research. The visit was carried out in follow-up to the 2005 visit of the previous Special Rapporteur, Rodolfo Stavenhagen. The principal focus of the report is an examination of the process for settling historical and contemporary claims based on the Treaty of Waitangi, although other key issues are also addressed. Especially in recent years, New Zealand has made significant strides to advance the rights of Maori people and to address concerns raised by the former Special Rapporteur. These include New Zealand’s expression of support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, its steps to repeal and reform the 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act, and its efforts to carry out a constitutional review process with respect to issues related to Maori people. Further efforts to advance Maori rights should be consolidated and strengthened, and the Special Rapporteur will continue to monitor developments in this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaikoura Earthquake Response – a Controller's Perspective
    Kaikoura Earthquake Response – A Controller’s Perspective John Mackie, Christchurch City Council Abstract Having just dealt with the tsunami alert and the overnight evacuation of 20,000 people from coastal areas of Christchurch, following the 7.8 magnitude earthquake at two minutes past midnight on 14 November 2016, key Civil Defence personnel from Christchurch were requested to assist with the response effort in Kaikoura who had suffered severe damage as a result of the quake. This paper outlines the priorities and challenges presented to emergency personnel that were deployed to assist the community and meet their immediate needs in response to one of New Zealand's largest recorded earthquakes. The first wave of responders from Christchurch included a Controller, Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) staff including operations manager, engineering support, planning and intelligence, welfare manager and staff, building and structural engineers, who were booked to fly to Kaikoura at first light on Tuesday 15 November. In a very short space of time after arrival on Tuesday morning, the team were briefed to gain a situational awareness from the local EOC team on the extent of the known damage, emerging issues and welfare needs in the community, which they had identified over the gruelling 34 hours since the event. We understood already that there was no road or rail access to the town due to landslips and cliff collapses, but the boat harbour had been rendered almost useless due to the seismic upheaval of the coast line. One of the short term priorities was to restore a temporary water supply as it was reported that three of the town's five reservoirs were damaged and there was one day of storage remaining at normal demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasury Report T2015/1646: EQC Investment Direction
    The Treasury Material Provided to the Public Inquiry into EQC Information Release August 2021 This document has been proactively released by the Treasury on the Treasury website at https://treasury.govt.nz/publications/information-release/public-inquiry-eqc Information Withheld Some parts of this information release would not be appropriate to release and, if requested, would be withheld under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Where this is the case, the relevant sections of the Act that would apply have been identified. Where information has been withheld, no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. Key to sections of the Act under which information has been withheld: [23] 9(2)(a) - to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people [25] 9(2)(b)(ii) - to protect the commercial position of the person who supplied the information or who is the subject of the information [26] 9(2)(ba)(i) - to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information would be likely to prejudice the supply of similar information, or information from the same source, and it is in the public interest that such information should continue to be supplied [31] 9(2)(f)(ii) - to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting collective and individual ministerial responsibility [33] 9(2)(f)(iv) - to maintain the current constitutional
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Realm of Central Christchurch Narrative
    THE PUBLIC REALM OF CENTRAL CHRISTCHURCH NARRATIVE Written by Debbie Tikao, Landscape Architect and General Manager of the Matapopore Charitable Trust. Kia atawhai ki te iwi – Care for the people Pita Te Hori, Upoko – Ngāi Tūāhuriri Rūnanga, 1861 The Public Realm of Central Christchurch Narrative 1 2 CERA Grand Narratives INTRODUCTION This historical narrative weaves together Ngāi Tahu cultural values, stories and traditional knowledge associated with Ōtautahi (Christchurch) and the highly mobile existence of hapū and whānau groups within the Canterbury area and the wider landscape of Te Waipounamu (South Island). The focus of this historical narrative therefore is on this mobile way of life and the depth of knowledge of the natural environment and natural phenomena that was needed to navigate the length and breadth of the diverse and extreme landscape of Te Waipounamu. The story that will unfold is not one of specific sites or specific areas, but rather a story of passage and the detailed cognitive maps that evolved over time through successive generations, which wove together spiritual, genealogical, historical and physical information that bound people to place and provided knowledge of landscape features, mahinga kai and resting places along the multitude of trails that established the basis for an economy based on trade and kinship. This knowledge system has been referred to in other places as an oral map or a memory map, which are both good descriptions; however, here it is referred to as a cognitive map in an attempt to capture the multiple layers of ordered and integrated information it contains. This historical narrative has been written to guide the design of the public realm of the Christchurch central business area, including the public spaces within the East and South frames.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission on Selwyn District Council Draft Long Term Plan 2018-2028
    Submission on Selwyn District Council Draft Long Term Plan 2018-2028 To: Selwyn District Council Submitter: Community & Public Health A division of the Canterbury District Health Board Attn: Kirsty Peel Community and Public Health C/- Canterbury District Health Board PO Box 1475 Christchurch 8140 Proposal: Selwyn District Council is consulting on their long-term plan to ascertain views on how best to manage infrastructure and services in the district over the next 10 years. Page 1 of 9 Template File Pathway: Y:\CFS\CPHGroups\RMC\SDC\LTP\2018\SelwynLTPSubmissionFinal180503.docx SUBMISSION ON SELWYN DISTRICT COUNCIL DRAFT LONG TERM PLAN Details of submitter 1. Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) 2. The CDHB is responsible for promoting the reduction of adverse environmental effects on the health of people and communities and to improve, promote and protect their health pursuant to the New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000 and the Health Act 1956. 3. These statutory obligations are the responsibility of the Ministry of Health and, in the Canterbury District, are carried out under contract by Community and Public Health under Crown funding agreements on behalf of the Canterbury District Health Board. General comments 4. Health and wellbeing (overall quality of life) is influenced by a wide range of factors beyond the health sector. These influences can be described as the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age, and are impacted by environmental, social and behavioural factors. They are often referred to as the ‘social determinants of health1. Barton and Grant’s Health Map2 shows how various influences on health are complex and interlinked.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Liquefaction-Induced Land Damage and Geomorphic Variability in Avonside, New Zealand
    6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering 1-4 November 2015 Christchurch, New Zealand Comparison of Liquefaction-induced Land Damage and Geomorphic Variability in Avonside, New Zealand S.H. Bastin1, M.C. Quigley2, K. Bassett3 Abstract Field mapping, LiDAR, and aerial photography are used to map surface liquefaction-induced lateral spreading fissures and aligned sand blow vents formed during the 22 February 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch earthquake. Classification of the study area into 164 polygons enables comparison of liquefaction severity metrics including linear liquefaction feature density, ejecta surface area, and horizontal and vertical ground surface displacements with geomorphic metrics including distance from the downslope free-face, surface elevation, sediment type, and the liquefaction potential index (LPI). Preliminary analyses indicate (i) mean fissure density decreases with increasing distance from the free face at distances of 0-50 m, no relationship is observed at distances >50 m, (ii) mean horizontal ground displacement increases with increasing LPI, and (iii) vertical subsidence is invariant with elevation, implying that other factors (e.g. LPI) may contribute to a complex liquefaction strain field. The basic geology and geomorphology are derived from LiDAR and modern river morphology. Comparison of the liquefaction data with geomorphic mapping indicates geomorphic mapping may be applied to determine the likely distribution of sediments susceptible to liquefaction. Introduction Cyclic shearing of loosely consolidated, fluid saturated sediments during earthquake-induced ground motion results in excess pore-water pressures and reduced shear strength in the affected media. Liquefaction occurs as the grain arrangement collapses causing pore water pressures to exceed the confining pressure (Seed & Idriss, 1982; Idriss & Boulanger, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Bicameralism in the New Zealand Context
    377 Bicameralism in the New Zealand context Andrew Stockley* In 1985, the newly elected Labour Government issued a White Paper proposing a Bill of Rights for New Zealand. One of the arguments in favour of the proposal is that New Zealand has only a one chamber Parliament and as a consequence there is less control over the executive than is desirable. The upper house, the Legislative Council, was abolished in 1951 and, despite various enquiries, has never been replaced. In this article, the writer calls for a reappraisal of the need for a second chamber. He argues that a second chamber could be one means among others of limiting the power of government. It is essential that a second chamber be independent, self-confident and sufficiently free of party politics. I. AN INTRODUCTION TO BICAMERALISM In 1950, the New Zealand Parliament, in the manner and form it was then constituted, altered its own composition. The legislative branch of government in New Zealand had hitherto been bicameral in nature, consisting of an upper chamber, the Legislative Council, and a lower chamber, the House of Representatives.*1 Some ninety-eight years after its inception2 however, the New Zealand legislature became unicameral. The Legislative Council Abolition Act 1950, passed by both chambers, did as its name implied, and abolished the Legislative Council as on 1 January 1951. What was perhaps most remarkable about this transformation from bicameral to unicameral government was the almost casual manner in which it occurred. The abolition bill was carried on a voice vote in the House of Representatives; very little excitement or concern was caused among the populace at large; and government as a whole seemed to continue quite normally.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Assessment Report | October Waimakariri District Council
    Waimakariri District Council Independent assessment report | October * An independent assessment report issued by the Independent Assessment Board for the CouncilMARK™ local government excellence programme. For more information visit www.councilmark.co.nz 1 MBIE 2016 2 Stats NZ Census 2013 3 DIA 2013 4 Ministry of Transport 2013/14 *Period of assessment March 2017 Waimakariri District Council assessment report 1 Assessment Summary AT A GLANCE The Waimakariri district is expecting continued rapid growth yet retains its rural/small town character. The current situation Waimakariri District Council is a medium-sized, high-growth council emerging from the rebuild that has followed the Canterbury earthquakes. In addition, approximately 10,000 people have moved into the district since the earthquakes, with a further 8,000 forecast to move there over the next seven years. As a result, some substantial issues have emerged. Competition over resources and priorities for development has built up between Rangiora, Kaiapoi and Woodend. Period of assessment The assessment was conducted on 13 and 14 March 2017. Notwithstanding the significant capital investment which has occurred post-earthquakes, particularly in infrastructure, there continues to be strong demand for further investment in local facilities. Transport solutions are needed to ensure the district remains a viable commuter suburb, with 42 per cent of the workforce now commuting to Christchurch. 2 CouncilMARK™ $1,100m GROSS DOMESTIC 1 PRODUCT SERVES RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKES UP 1,546km 57,800 % ROADS4 2 0.841 PEOPLE , A MIX OF 3 91% EUROPEAN/PAKEHA OF NEW ZEALAND’S TOTAL LAND AREA 7% MĀORI REPRESENTING WAIMAKARIRI 2% ASIAN DISTRICT, FROM PEGASUS BAY THROUGH TO PUKETERAKI RANGE, AN AREA OF: 2 2,255 km POPULATION TREND HIGH GROWTH Key learnings The Council needs to be responsive to the pace and timing of change expected by its community relative to its own plans.
    [Show full text]