Federal Reserve Bulletin June 1934
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SURVEY of CURRENT BUSINESS September 1934
SEPTEMBER 1934 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE WASHINGTON VOLUME 14 NUMBER 9 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN STATISTICAL SERIES SINCE PUBLICATION OF THE 1932 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT For convenience there is listed below a tabulation of the changes which have been made in the past 2 years. If back data have been presented for the new series, a reference to the monthly issues in which such statistics appeared may be found in the footnotes which are included on pages 22 to 56, inclusive. NEW SERIES ADDED JUNE 1934 JUNE 1933 Agricultural loans outstanding (six series). Bond prices, domestic, United States Liberty (New DECEMBER 1932 Agricultural products, cash income received from marketings of. York Trust Co.). Brick, face, production (brick drawn from kilns). Auto accessories and parts, composite index of ship- Beverages: ments. Fermented malt liquors: Building costs, by types of construction (American Production, consumption, and stocks. Appraisal Co.). Canadian statistics, electric-power production index. Distilled spirits: Cotton textiles, production, shipments, stocks, etc. Chain-store sales index (Chain Store Age). Production, consumption, and stocks in bonded Farm products—price index of dairy and poultry Civil service employment, United States. warehouses. products (combined index). Convection type radiators, new orders. Cotton cloth (bleached, dyed, and printed), pro- Glass containers, net new orders. Department-store sales, Philadelphia. duction and stocks. Gold, held under earmark for foreign account. Factory employment (Bureau of Labor Statistics). Factory employment, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Mary- Hours of work per week in factories, nominal or land, and Massachusetts. -
Ordinances—1934
Australian Capital Territory Ordinances—1934 A chronological listing of ordinances notified in 1934 [includes ordinances 1934 Nos 1-26] Ordinances—1934 1 Sheriff Ordinance Repeal Ordinance 1934 (repealed) repealed by Ord1937-27 notified 8 February 1934 (Cwlth Gaz 1934 No 8) sch 3 commenced 8 February 1934 (see Seat of Government 23 December 1937 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 2 * Administration and Probate Ordinance 1934 (repealed) repealed by A2000-80 notified 8 February 1934 (Cwlth Gaz 1934 No 8) sch 4 commenced 8 February 1934 (see Seat of Government 21 December 2000 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 3 Liquor (Renewal of Licences) Ordinance 1934 (repealed) repealed by Ord1937-27 notified 8 February 1934 (Cwlth Gaz 1934 No 9) sch 3 commenced 8 February 1934 (see Seat of Government 23 December 1937 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 4 Oaths Ordinance 1934 (repealed) repealed by Ord1984-79 notified 15 February 1934 (Cwlth Gaz 1934 No 10) s 2 commenced 15 February 1934 (see Seat of Government 19 December 1984 (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 5 Dogs Registration Ordinance 1934 (repealed) repealed by Ord1975-18 notified 1 March 1934 (Cwlth Gaz 1934 No 13) sch commenced 1 March 1934 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 21 July 1975 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 6 * Administration and Probate Ordinance (No 2) 1934 (repealed) repealed by A2000-80 notified 22 March 1934 (Cwlth Gaz 1934 No 17) sch 4 commenced 22 March 1934 (see Seat of Government (Administration) 21 December 2000 Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 12) 7 Advisory -
Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan. -
SURVEY of CURRENT BUSINESS January 1936
JANUARY 1936 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE WASHINGTON VOLUME 16 NUMBER 1 THE charts on pages 4 and 5 portray the trend of commodity prices from 1929 to date. The better balanced price structure at the end of 1935 as com pared with that of 3 years earlier is clearly Indicated. A. discussion of recent trends with particular emphasis on the relationship of the various price groups Is dis cussed In the special article on the pages noted above. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DANIEL C. ROPER, Secretary BUREAU OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE N. H. ENGLE, Acting Director SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS Prepared in the DIVISION OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH ROY G. BLAKEY, Chief M. JOSEPH MEEHAN, Editor Volume 16 JANUARY 1936 Number 1 CONTENTS SUMMARIES AND CHARTS STATISTICAL DATA-continued Page Business indicators................................................ 2 Monthly business statistics: Page Business situation summarized. • • • . • . • . • . • . • . 3 Business indexes............................................... 18 Comparison of principal data, 1931-35.............................. 6 Commodity prices............................................. 19 Domestic trade. • . .. .. • . • . • . .. • . 7 Construction and real estate................................... 20 Employment. • . • . • . • . • . • . • . • . .. .. .. • . • . • . • . • 8 Domestic trade................................................ 21 Finance........................................................... 9 Employment -
Nazi Privatization in 1930S Germany1 by GERMÀ BEL
Economic History Review (2009) Against the mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930s Germany1 By GERMÀ BEL Nationalization was particularly important in the early 1930s in Germany.The state took over a large industrial concern, large commercial banks, and other minor firms. In the mid-1930s, the Nazi regime transferred public ownership to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in western capitalistic countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during the 1930s. Privatization was used as a political tool to enhance support for the government and for the Nazi Party. In addition, growing financial restrictions because of the cost of the rearmament programme provided additional motivations for privatization. rivatization of large parts of the public sector was one of the defining policies Pof the last quarter of the twentieth century. Most scholars have understood privatization as the transfer of government-owned firms and assets to the private sector,2 as well as the delegation to the private sector of the delivery of services previously delivered by the public sector.3 Other scholars have adopted a much broader meaning of privatization, including (besides transfer of public assets and delegation of public services) deregulation, as well as the private funding of services previously delivered without charging the users.4 In any case, modern privatization has been usually accompanied by the removal of state direction and a reliance on the free market. Thus, privatization and market liberalization have usually gone together. Privatizations in Chile and the UK, which began to be implemented in the 1970s and 1980s, are usually considered the first privatization policies in modern history.5 A few researchers have found earlier instances. -
Presentation Slides
Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound: Lessons from the 1930s U.S. Christopher Hanes March 2013 Last resorts for monetary authorities in a liquidity trap: 1) Replace inflation target with target for price level or nominal GDP In standard NK models, credible announcement immediately boosts ∆p, lowers real interest rates while we are still trapped at zero bound. “Expected inflation channel” 2) “Quantitative easing” or Large-Scale Asset Purchases (LSAPs) Buy long-term bonds in exchange for bills or reserves to push down on term, risk or liquidity premiums through “portfolio effects” Can 1) work? Do portfolio effects exist? I look at 1930s, when U.S. in liquidity trap. 1) No clear evidence for expected-inflation channel 2) Yes: evidence of portfolio effects Expected-inflation channel: theory Lessons from the 1930s U.S. β New-Keynesian Phillips curve: ∆p ' E ∆p % (y&y n) t t t%1 γ t T β a distant horizon T ∆p ' E [∆p % (y&y n) ] t t t%T λ j t%τ τ'0 n To hit price-level or $AD target, authorities must boost future (y&y )t%τ For any given path of y in near future, while we are still in liquidity trap, that raises current ∆pt , reduces rt , raises yt , lifts us out of trap Why it might fail: - expectations not so forward-looking, rational - promise not credible Svensson’s “Foolproof Way” out of liquidity trap: peg to depreciated exchange rate “a conspicuous commitment to a higher price level in the future” Expected-inflation channel: 1930s experience Lessons from the 1930s U.S. -
Hitler's American Model
Hitler’s American Model The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law James Q. Whitman Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford 1 Introduction This jurisprudence would suit us perfectly, with a single exception. Over there they have in mind, practically speaking, only coloreds and half-coloreds, which includes mestizos and mulattoes; but the Jews, who are also of interest to us, are not reckoned among the coloreds. —Roland Freisler, June 5, 1934 On June 5, 1934, about a year and a half after Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of the Reich, the leading lawyers of Nazi Germany gathered at a meeting to plan what would become the Nuremberg Laws, the notorious anti-Jewish legislation of the Nazi race regime. The meeting was chaired by Franz Gürtner, the Reich Minister of Justice, and attended by officials who in the coming years would play central roles in the persecution of Germany’s Jews. Among those present was Bernhard Lösener, one of the principal draftsmen of the Nuremberg Laws; and the terrifying Roland Freisler, later President of the Nazi People’s Court and a man whose name has endured as a byword for twentieth-century judicial savagery. The meeting was an important one, and a stenographer was present to record a verbatim transcript, to be preserved by the ever-diligent Nazi bureaucracy as a record of a crucial moment in the creation of the new race regime. That transcript reveals the startling fact that is my point of departure in this study: the meeting involved detailed and lengthy discussions of the law of the United States. -
THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9 JANUARY, 1934 in Wire Pickling and Drawing and in Wire Nail R.N.R
234 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9 JANUARY, 1934 in wire pickling and drawing and in wire nail R.N.R. making, polishing, 'bagging and weighing at Paymaster Sub-Lieut. J. Tunstall to be Payr. the Caledonia Nail Works of J. and W. Lieut. 1st Jan. 1934. Somerville Limited, St. Ninians, Stirling, subject to the conditions that a worker shall R.N.V.R. not be employed in the afternoon shift in con- Surgn. Lieut. C. C. Ungley, M.D., B.S., to be secutive weeks and that suitable accommoda- Surgn. Lieut.-Comdr. 3rd Jan. 1934. tion for clothing put off during working Payr. Lieut. T. E. Ford to be Payr. Lieut.- hours, messroom accommodation and washing Comdr. 18th Dec. 1933. facilities; and, for workers employed in pick- ling, suitable protective clothing shall be provided. Admiralty, 6th January, 1934. Whitehall, 6th January, 1934 E.N. Cd. Gunner E. J. Manning placed on Retd. List with rank of Lieut. 6th Jan. 1934. Factory Department, Home Office, January 3, 1934. War Office, The Chief Inspector of Factories gives notice 9th January, 1934. that in consequence of the resignation of Dr. R. C. Worsley. an appointment as Certify- REGULAR ARMY. ing Surgeon under the Factory, and Workshop Acts at Mitcheldean, in the County of Col. (temp. Brig., and Hon. Brig.-Gen.) Gloucester, is vacant. Latest date for receipt O. F. Phillips, C.M.G., D.S.O., Aust. Staff of applications, 30th January, 1934. Corps, is apptd. A.D.C. to The King (Addl.), 4th Sept. 1933, vice Col. (Hon. Brig.-Gen.) C. H. Brand, C.B., C.M.G., C.V.O., D.S.O., Aust. -
1933–1941, a New Deal for Forest Service Research in California
The Search for Forest Facts: A History of the Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1926–2000 Chapter 4: 1933–1941, A New Deal for Forest Service Research in California By the time President Franklin Delano Roosevelt won his landslide election in 1932, forest research in the United States had grown considerably from the early work of botanical explorers such as Andre Michaux and his classic Flora Boreali- Americana (Michaux 1803), which first revealed the Nation’s wealth and diversity of forest resources in 1803. Exploitation and rapid destruction of forest resources had led to the establishment of a federal Division of Forestry in 1876, and as the number of scientists professionally trained to manage and administer forest land grew in America, it became apparent that our knowledge of forestry was not entirely adequate. So, within 3 years after the reorganization of the Bureau of Forestry into the Forest Service in 1905, a series of experiment stations was estab- lished throughout the country. In 1915, a need for a continuing policy in forest research was recognized by the formation of the Branch of Research (BR) in the Forest Service—an action that paved the way for unified, nationwide attacks on the obvious and the obscure problems of American forestry. This idea developed into A National Program of Forest Research (Clapp 1926) that finally culminated in the McSweeney-McNary Forest Research Act (McSweeney-McNary Act) of 1928, which authorized a series of regional forest experiment stations and the undertaking of research in each of the major fields of forestry. Then on March 4, 1933, President Roosevelt was inaugurated, and during the “first hundred days” of Roosevelt’s administration, Congress passed his New Deal plan, putting the country on a better economic footing during a desperate time in the Nation’s history. -
2788 the London ,Gazett-E, 1 May, 1934
2788 THE LONDON ,GAZETT-E, 1 MAY, 1934 " Antarctic 1929-30." - iShpt. Lieut. S. C. McClonnan placed on Retd. 0. Degerfeldt. List. 27th Apr. 1934. Frank G. Dungey. Cd. Gunr. G. F. W. Adams to be Lieut. 9th Harry .V. Gage. Apr. 1934. Richard W. Hampson.. B.N.R.. James.T. Kyle. To be Paymaster Sub-Lieuts. (Registrar James-W; S. Marr, M.A., B.Sc. Class): — Kenneth McLennan.- • • S. A. Waldron. .:; F. Leonard Marsland. D. J. Morissey. John A. Park. G.. E. Wallace. -.'-'". Clarence H. V. Selwood. J. A. Bent. W: Simpson. A. Goldfinch. ; . Stanley R. Smith. D. MacLean. .. ... F. Sones. H. L. V. Phillips. .- . -.,.•• Raymond C. Tomlinson. G. .E. Thompson. ' . " Antarctic 1930-31." 24tb Apr. 1934. Frank Best. Ernest Bond. .. William E. jOrosby. Admiralty, 30th April, 1934. ' A. Henriksen. R.N. William E. Howard. Comdr. C. H. Ringrose placed on Retd. List Alexander L. Kennedy. at own request. 30th Apr. 1934. Norman C. Mateer. Lieut. G. E. Smith (Retd.) to be Lieut.: Murde C. Morrison. Comdr. (Retd.). 29th Apr. 1934. Lieutenant Karl E. Oom, R.A.N. Louis Parviainen. Shore Signal Service. David Peacock. - Ch. Offr. C. A. Haynes to be Senr. Ch. Offr. Josiah J. Pill. 29th Apr. 1934. William F. Porteus. .. John E. Reed. Senr. Chief Offr. A. C. Roberts placed on George J. Rhodes. Retd. List with rank of Lieut. 29th Apr. Arthur M. Stanton. 1934. Fred. G. Ward. Joseph Williams. " - Admiralty, 1st May, 1934. R.N. Lieut.-Comdr. C. J. Carr placed on Retd. List Admiralty, 25th April, 1934. at own request. 1st May 1934. -
Activity Pack
HOME LEARNING ACTIVITY PACK THE NAZIS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE AGED YEARS OLD 1 HOME LEARNING ACTIVITY PACK 2 THE NAZIS GERMANY AFTER WORLD WAR 1 fter 4 long years of war, Germany waved the white flag and admitted A defeat on 11th November 1918. Many of the German troops couldn’t believe it – they believed they were winning the war. The only explanation to many of these soldiers is that the Otto Frank (left) and his brother government had ‘stabbed them in the back.’ Robert (right) both fought for Germany in WW1 The loss of the war meant that Germany had to sign the Treaty of Versailles. One of the clauses in this treaty was that they accepted the blame for the war. Many people thought this was deeply unfair. Germany had no choice but to sign, leaving them to pay huge reparations— A protest about the Treaty of Versailles in Berlin in 1932. £6.6 BILLION. This bankrupted Germany, leading to hyperinflation (money becoming worthless), huge unemployment and starvation of people. More and more Germans began to believe the ‘Stab in the Back’ theory, which blamed the Jews for the loss in the war. Children playing with worthless banknotes in 1923 2 HOME LEARNING ACTIVITY PACK 2 THE NAZIS HOW DID HITLER RISE TO POWER? Although Germany did begin to recover in the 1920s with the help of the Dawes Plan (where America loaned Germany $45million and gave them longer to repay the war debt) many former soldiers especially still believed they’d been betrayed. In 1923 Adolf Hitler tried to overthrow the government in the Munich Putsch. -
City Council History
Mayor Commissioner Commissioner Albert Kirchner Hugo Stratemann April 1924 - April 1926 Ferdinand Blumberg Resigned in Mar. 1925 Appointed in Jan. 1924 Fire, Ordinance, Sanitation, Cemeteries, Streets, Bridges, Fair Grounds, Lights, Election 4/1/1924 Finance, Police, Water Works, Street Lights, and Building and Hospital Parks, and Telephone & Telegraph Alfred Staats Hugo Stratemann April 1926 - April 1928 Hilmar Triesch Appointed in Apr. 1925 Pro Tem 4/26 - 4/32 Fire & Police, Ordinance, Cemeteries, Streets, Bridges, Fair Grounds, Lights, Election 4/6/1926 Finance, Water Works, Building, Sanitation, and Sewer Hospital, and Parks and Telephone & Telegraph April 1928 - April 1930 Hilmar Triesch George Reininger Hugo Stratemann Streets, Bridges, Street Lights, Pro Tem 4/26 - 4/32 Election 4/3/1928 Finance, Water Works, Public Utilities, Building, Cemeteries, and Sewer and Sanitation Fire & Police, Fair Grounds, Hospital, and Parks April 1930 - April 1932 Hilmar Triesch George Reininger Hugo Stratemann Resigned in Jan. 1931 Streets, Bridges, Street Lights, Pro Tem 4/26 - 4/32 Election 4/1/1930 Finance, Water Works, Public Utilities, Building, Cemeteries, and Sewer and Sanitation Fire & Police, Fair Grounds, Hospital, and Parks Hilmar Fischer George Reininger Louis Voigt April 1932 - April 1934 Pro Tem 4/32 - 4/34 Appointed in Feb. 1931 Streets, Bridges, Fair Grounds, Public Utilities, Street Lights, Sanitation, Election 4/5/1932 Finance, Fire & Police, Water Works, and Cemeteries and Public Buildings Sewer, Incinerator, Hospital, and Parks