Filed by Reinvent Technology Partners Y Pursuant to Rule 425
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Electric Vehicle Market Status - Update Manufacturer Commitments to Future Electric Mobility in the U.S
Electric Vehicle Market Status - Update Manufacturer Commitments to Future Electric Mobility in the U.S. and Worldwide September 2020 Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Drivers of Global Electric Vehicle Growth – Global Goals to Phase out Internal Combustion Engines ..... 6 Policy Drivers of U.S. Electric Vehicle Growth ........................................................................................... 8 Manufacturer Commitments ....................................................................................................................... 10 Job Creation ................................................................................................................................................ 13 Charging Network Investments .................................................................................................................. 15 Commercial Fleet Electrification Commitments ........................................................................................ 17 Sales Forecast.............................................................................................................................................. 19 Battery Pack Cost Projections and EV Price Parity ................................................................................... -
Automated Driving Activities in the U.S
AUTOMATED DRIVING ACTIVITIES IN THE U.S. A PARTIAL REPORT JANE LAPPIN CHAIR, TRB STANDING COMMITTEE ON VEHICLE HIGHWAY AUTOMATION APRIL 19, 2021 EUCAD- VIRTUALLY BRUSSELS WHAT NATIONAL POLICIES AND ACTIONS CAN ACCELERATE DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT? • Structural safety standards for new vehicle designs • Data exchange standards • Safe driving integration, by ODD, vehicle size/type • Public acceptance • Built infrastructure • ReMote operations • • Machine-readable signage Consistent national regulations • Procedural safety • Digital short-range communications • Platooning • Road operations • Planning • Ethics • Sensors/enabling technologies • Liability • Equity • Internal and external vehicle communications • Investment in Innovation* • Accessibility • Multi-sector Pilots • Personal security • Public deMonstrations • Cybersecurity • Test beds INDICATORS OF HEALTHY INNOVATION: AS OF FEBRUARY 25, 2021, CA DMV HAS ISSUED AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TESTING PERMITS (WITH A DRIVER) TO THE FOLLOWING 56 ENTITIES: • AIMOTIVE INC • RENOVO.AUTO • Qcraft.ai • • • AMBARELLA CORPORATION RIDECELL INC • LEONIS TECHNOLOGIES QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, • INC • APEX.AI SUBARU • LYFT, INC • TELENAV, INC. • APPLE INC • BOX BOT INC • MANDO AMERICA CORP • • TESLA • ARGO AI, LLC CONTINENTAL • MERC BENZ • • TOYOTA RESEARCH INSTITUTE • ATLAS ROBOTICS, INC CRUISE LLC • NIO USA INC. • • UATC, LLC (UBER) • AURORA INNOVATION CYNGN INC • NISSAN • DEEPROUTE.AI • UDACITY • AUTOX TECHNOLOGIES INC • NURO, INC • • Udelv, Inc • BAIDU USA LLC DELPHI • NVIDIA CORPORATION • • VALEO NORTH AMERICA, -
Provisional Injunctive Relief Under the UTSA and the DTSA in Federal Court New Product Cases
Science and Technology Law Review Volume 23 Number 2 Article 3 2020 Provisional Injunctive Relief Under the UTSA and the DTSA in Federal Court New Product Cases Richard F. Dole, Jr. Univerisity of Houston Law Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/scitech Part of the Computer Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard F Dole,, Provisional Injunctive Relief Under the UTSA and the DTSA in Federal Court New Product Cases, 23 SMU SCI. & TECH. L. REV. 127 (2020) https://scholar.smu.edu/scitech/vol23/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Science and Technology Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. Provisional Injunctive Relief Under the UTSA and the DTSA in Federal Court New Product Cases Richard F. Dole, Jr.* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 128 II. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 65 ............ 131 A. Procedural Requirements .............................. 131 B. Discretionary Requirements ............................ 133 III. THE WAYMO CASE ...................................... 136 A. Background ........................................... 136 B. Lessons from the Waymo Case ......................... 141 1. The Importance of the Unchallenged Evidence that Levandowski had Downloaded Without Authorization Over 14,000 Files of Waymo’s Driverless Vehicle Research.......................................... 141 2. Judge Alsup’s Refusal to Draw Negative Inferences from Levandowski’s Claim Over 400 Times of the Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self- Incrimination ..................................... 141 3. The Adequacy of Waymo’s Remedy at Law ....... -
2021 Tech M&A Outlook: Internet of Things
2021 Tech M&A Outlook: Internet of Things Analysts - Christian Renaud, Rich Karpinski, Katy Ring, Brian O’Rourke, Johan Vermij, Mark Fontecchio, Jonathan Stern Publication date: Thursday, February 18 2021 Introduction Semiconductor activity contributed to a strong year for IoT dealmaking in 2020, followed by a flurry of consolidation in the healthcare, transportation, manufacturing and wireless sectors. According to 451 Research's M&A KnowledgeBase, the total value of IoT acquisitions rose to nearly $69bn from $8bn in 2019. Transaction volume was down slightly to 125 prints from the 2019 record of 139 purchases. Even backing out the $33.5bn NVIDIA-Arm pairing, total deal value was over four times the prior year. M&A activity was concentrated in a small handful of verticals as businesses sought to digitize. Spurred by a global health crisis, healthcare technology-related transactions led in volume with 24 acquisitions totaling over $19bn, or 20% of all deals in the year. There was continued enthusiasm for the transportation sector, with 13 transactions in both commercial and consumer transportation totaling over $5.8bn, including four rather large LiDAR special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) deals. This transportation number does not include the acquisition in December of Uber's Advanced Technology Group by Aurora Innovation for a reported $4bn and is also not reflected in the $66bn in total IoT transactions. Healthcare and transportation were followed by manufacturing and industrial (13 prints, $5bn) and wireless-related firms (sensors and infrastructure), with 13 deals totaling $41m. This export was generated by user [email protected] at account S&P Global on 6/24/2021 from IP address 168.149.160.75. -
Burleson & Company, LLC Form 13F-HR Filed 2021-05-12
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 13F-HR Initial quarterly Form 13F holdings report filed by institutional managers Filing Date: 2021-05-12 | Period of Report: 2021-03-31 SEC Accession No. 0001104659-21-064935 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Burleson & Company, LLC Mailing Address Business Address 201 1ST STREET, SUITE 204 201 1ST STREET, SUITE 204 CIK:1733510| IRS No.: 201160877 | State of Incorp.:CA | Fiscal Year End: 1231 PETALUMA CA 94952 PETALUMA CA 94952 Type: 13F-HR | Act: 34 | File No.: 028-18696 | Film No.: 21913955 (707) 283-0520 Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document OMB APPROVAL UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE OMB Number: 3235-0006 COMMISSION Expires: July 31, 2015 Washington, D.C. 20549 Estimated average burden hours per response: 23.8 FORM 13F FORM 13F COVER PAGE Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended: 03-31-2021 Check here if Amendment: ☐ Amendment Number: This Amendment (Check only one.): ☐ is a restatement. ☐ adds new holdings entries. Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report: Name: Burleson & Company, LLC Address: 201 1st Street, Suite 204 Petaluma, CA 94952 Form 13F File Number: 028-18696 The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements, schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form. Person Signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager: Name: James Burleson Title: Principal and Chief Compliance Officer Phone: 707-283-0520 Signature, Place, and Date of Signing: /s/ James Burleson Petaluma, CALIFORNIA 05-12-2021 [Signature] [City, State] [Date] Report Type (Check only one.): ☒ 13F HOLDINGS REPORT. -
GM Sells Shuttered Ohio Assembly Plant to Electric Vehicle Startup by David Welch November 7, 2019, 3:10 PM EST
Hyperdrive GM Sells Shuttered Ohio Assembly Plant to Electric Vehicle Startup By David Welch November 7, 2019, 3:10 PM EST Lordstown Motors is still raising money for its plug-in pickup CEO Steve Burns says he hopes to start production in late 2020 rally-goers from selling their homes because of all the jobs he would bring back to the area. Democrats seized on the development as a symbol of unfulfilled promises made to voters in a key battleground state. Trump was so eager to endorse GM’s discussions to sell the Lordstown plant that he preempted the announcement of the talks in May by the largest U.S. automaker and Workhorse. But both companies are on shaky financial footing, with Workhorse totaling just $6,000 of revenue during its latest quarter. American flags fly in front of the GM plant in Lordstown, Ohio, in March. The automaker has sold the factory to Lordstown Motors. Lordstown Motors Corp., the electric-truck startup formed specifically to save a shuttered Ohio car factory, has acquired the highly politicized plant from General Motors Co. The acquisition that the two companies announced Thursday ends an era that began when GM opened the complex in 1966. The factory’s fate was largely sealed when the United Auto Workers union was unable to convince GM to keep it in the fold as part of a new labor contact ratified late last month. With the plant acquisition out of the way, Steve Burns, who Terms of the deal aren’t being disclosed. Workhorse Group used to lead Workhorse and is now chief executive officer Inc., which is affiliated with Lordstown Motors but doesn’t of Lordstown Motors, is turning his attention to phase two: share any ownership, soared 27% to close at $3.13 in New seeking cash to convert the Lordstown plant from making York trading. -
Nevada Supply Chain Analysis
Financial Advisory Gaming & Hospitality Public Policy Research Real Estate Advisory [Year] Regional & Urban Economics NEVADA COVID-19 COORDINATED ECONOMIC RESPONSE PLAN: SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR THE: & DECEMBER 2020 Prepared By: & 7219 West Sahara Avenue Spatial Economic Concepts Suite 110-A Las Vegas, NV 89117 Main 702-967-3188 www.rcgecon.com December 31, 2020 Mr. Michael Brown Executive Director Governor’s Office of Economic Development State of Nevada 808 W. Nye Lane Carson City, Nevada 89703 Re: Nevada COVID-19 Coordinated Economic Response Plan: Supply Chain Analysis (“Study/Report”) Dear Mr. Brown: The Consulting Team (“CT’) of RCG Economics LLC (“RCG”) and Spatial Economic Concepts (“SEC”) is pleased to submit the referenced study to the Governor’s Office of Economic Development (“GOED”) and the Nevada State Treasurer’s Office (“STO”) relative to the Nevada COVID-19 Coordinated Economic Response Plan by the State of Nevada (“the State or Nevada”) for an analysis of Nevada’s supply chain and last-mile delivery services in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. According to GOED: “The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a number of adverse effects on the State of Nevada’s economy, as the State has been faced with disruptions to existing supply chain infrastructure. The strain placed on the supply chain throughout the public health emergency has resulted in significant delays for the delivery of essential products and lifesaving prescription medications for Nevada residents.” This Study focuses on the steps that Nevada can take to improve its supply chain infrastructure to adequately respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and contains the following elements. -
Usef-I Q2 2021
Units Cost Market Value U.S. EQUITY FUND-I U.S. Equities 88.35% Domestic Common Stocks 10X GENOMICS INC 5,585 868,056 1,093,655 1ST SOURCE CORP 249 9,322 11,569 2U INC 301 10,632 12,543 3D SYSTEMS CORP 128 1,079 5,116 3M CO 11,516 2,040,779 2,287,423 A O SMITH CORP 6,897 407,294 496,998 AARON'S CO INC/THE 472 8,022 15,099 ABBOTT LABORATORIES 24,799 2,007,619 2,874,948 ABBVIE INC 17,604 1,588,697 1,982,915 ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO 1,021 19,690 47,405 ABIOMED INC 9,158 2,800,138 2,858,303 ABM INDUSTRIES INC 1,126 40,076 49,938 ACACIA RESEARCH CORP 1,223 7,498 8,267 ACADEMY SPORTS & OUTDOORS INC 1,036 35,982 42,725 ACADIA HEALTHCARE CO INC 2,181 67,154 136,858 ACADIA REALTY TRUST 1,390 24,572 30,524 ACCO BRANDS CORP 1,709 11,329 14,749 ACI WORLDWIDE INC 6,138 169,838 227,965 ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC 13,175 839,968 1,257,422 ACUITY BRANDS INC 1,404 132,535 262,590 ACUSHNET HOLDINGS CORP 466 15,677 23,020 ADAPTHEALTH CORP 1,320 39,475 36,181 ADAPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGIES CORP 18,687 644,897 763,551 ADDUS HOMECARE CORP 148 13,034 12,912 ADOBE INC 5,047 1,447,216 2,955,725 ADT INC 3,049 22,268 32,899 ADTALEM GLOBAL EDUCATION INC 846 31,161 30,151 ADTRAN INC 892 10,257 18,420 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC 216 34,544 44,310 ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS INC 12,295 298,154 1,433,228 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 14,280 895,664 1,341,320 ADVANSIX INC 674 15,459 20,126 ADVANTAGE SOLUTIONS INC 1,279 14,497 13,800 ADVERUM BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC 1,840 7,030 6,440 AECOM 5,145 227,453 325,781 AEGLEA BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC 287 1,770 1,998 AEMETIS INC 498 6,023 5,563 AERSALE CORP -
Engaging Drivers and Law Enforcement
SM Governors Highway Safety Association ® The States’ Voice on Highway Safety Automated Vehicle Safety Expert Panel: Engaging Drivers and Law Enforcement AUGUST 2019 www.ghsa.org MADE POSSIBLE BY A GRANT FROM Table of Contents Introduction 1 Brief Background on Automated Vehicles 1 The Role of State Highway Offices 4 State Behavioral Highway Safety Programs and Partnerships 4 State Highway Safety Offices and Automated Vehicles 5 Current State Automated Vehicle Activities 6 Legislation 6 Testing and Deployment 6 Automated Vehicles and State Highway Safety Offices: Challenges and Recommendations 8 Challenges Involving Automated Vehicle Policy 8 Challenges Involving the Public 9 Public Information Recommendations for SHSOs and Other Stakeholders 10 Automated Vehicles and Law Enforcement: Challenges and Recommendations 13 Challenges Involving AV Policy 13 Challenges Involving AV Operations 14 Operational Recommendations for Law Enforcement and SHSOs 16 Major Themes and Conclusions 17 Summary of Recommendations for State Highway Safety Offices, Law Enforcement, and GHSA 18 References 20 Appendix 23 Agenda 23 Goals 23 Attendee List 24 The report was overseen by GHSA Executive Director Jonathan Adkins and Director of Government Relations Russ Martin. Senior Director of Communications and Programs Kara Macek and Communications Manager Madison Forker edited the report. The views and recommendations in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of GHSA, State Farm® or the individuals or organizations represented on the expert Panel. The report was designed by Brad Amburn. Introduction Automated vehicles—vehicles with technology that can perform some or all driving tasks, called AVs for short—already are appearing on our roads. Their presence will expand steadily in the coming years. -
Gm's Closed Lordstown Factory Spawns a Wave of Industrial Migrants
GM’S CLOSED LORDSTOWN FACTORY SPAWNS A WAVE OF INDUSTRIAL MIGRANTS Workers leave their families behind in Ohio in search of good pay and benefits in other states. By Michael Phillips and Nora Naughton November 29, 2020 On Zach Sherry’s first day of work at the General Motors Co. factory in Bedford, Ind., trainers gave a safety presentation that included an image of a cartoon hand spurting blood from the ring finger. The overt message was straightforward: Rings can get caught in the machinery, so don’t wear them on the job. The symbolism wasn’t lost on the 48-year-old Mr. Sherry, who had transferred to the Indiana facility after losing his previous job at the GM plant in Lordstown, Ohio, that shut down last year. The transfer meant leaving his family behind one state away. “You just took me 450 miles from my home and you’re telling me to take my wedding ring off,” he says. Mr. Sherry is one of a cadre of Lordstown workers turned middle-aged industrial migrants, venturing out alone in search of good pay and benefits. Itinerant work has long been common in manufacturing, including people moving around the country for fracking jobs. Auto workers haven’t been immune to chasing their livelihoods across state lines, either. When GM and Chrysler LLC. closed plants as part of their bankruptcy restructurings a decade ago, workers were moved to the factories that survived. The workers in Lordstown, many of whom are multigenerational GM employees, never planned to be among them. The plant was an example of American manufacturing might when it opened in 1966, churning out Chevrolet Impalas, Bel Airs and Caprices. -
Automotive Industry Outlook: Staying Ahead of the Curve in a Rapidly Changing Landscape March 2021
Automotive Industry Outlook: Staying Ahead of the Curve in a Rapidly Changing Landscape March 2021 Mike Wall Executive Director, Automotive Analysis +1 248 728 8400 Direct +1 616 446 6885 Mobile [email protected] © 2021 IHS Markit. All Rights Reserved. 2 A World Leader in Critical Information, Analytics and Solutions Addressing Strategic Challenges with Interconnected Capabilities Energy Financial Agribusiness Services 50,000+ 80% Climate & Economics & customers in over of the Fortune Sustainability Country Risk 140 countries Global 500 Engineering & Life Sciences Product Design 94/100 $4B annual revenue largest US corporates Telecoms & NYSE: INFO Chemical Technology Maritime & Automotive Trade © 2021 IHS Markit. All Rights Reserved. 3 World Economic Growth Global Growth Improved in February; World Real GDP is Projected to Increase 5.1% in 2021 10.0 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2028 World Average 8.0 2021 = +5.1% 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 -2.0 (in percent) -4.0 -6.0 Annual GrowthAnnual GDP Real -8.0 -10.0 World United Japan Eurozone Brazil Russia India China States (mainland) Source: IHS Markit Data Insight © 2021 IHS Markit. All Rights Reserved. 4 Introduction to Automotive Semiconductor: From Silicon to Cars Car Silicon Ingots and Packaged and Electronics Control Units* • 1,000 – 1,400 Processed wafers chips / car Raw silicon wafers tested chips (ECU) • $427 chip value / car in 2020 Manufacturing cycle time: Months Days Hours Semiconductor Suppliers NXP, Infineon, Renesas, Texas Instruments, Material suppliers: STMicroelectronics, ON Semi, Micron, Samsung... Tier 1: OEMs: Shin-Etsu, Siltronics, Bosch, Continental, Aptiv, Valeo, VW, Toyota, Toyota, Soitec Harman, BorgWarner, Denso… GM, RNM… Foundries (front end): Packaging & Test TSMC, Samsung, (back-end) * Picture from IHS Markit Teardown of GlobalFoundries, UMC, Amkor, ASE, UTAC Harman – Mercedes TTG9 Head-Unit Tower, DB Hitek, SMIC © 2021 IHS Markit. -
A Behavioural Lens on Transportation Systems: the Psychology of Commuter Behaviour and Transportation Choices
A Behavioural Lens on Transportation Systems: The Psychology of Commuter Behaviour and Transportation Choices Kim Ly, Saurabh Sati, and Erica Singer, and Dilip Soman Research Paper originally prepared for the Regional Municipality of York Region 22 March 2017 Research Report Series Behavioural Economics in Action, Rotman School of Management University of Toronto 2 Correspondence and Acknowledgements For questions and enquiries, please contact: Professors Dilip Soman or Nina Mažar Rotman School of Management University of Toronto 105 St. George Street Toronto, ON M5S 3E6 Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Phone Number: (416) 946-0195 We thank the Regional Municipality of York Region for support, Philip Afèche, Eric Miller, Birsen Donmez, Tim Chen, and Liz Kang for insights, comments, and discussions. All errors are our own. 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7 2. The Impact of Path Characteristics on Travel Choices ....................................... 9 2.1 Hassle factors – Mental effort and Commuter Orientation ................................... 11 2.2 Perceived Progress towards a Destination ............................................................... 14 2.3 Physical Environment Surrounding the Travel path and The Effect on The Commuter ...............................................................................................................................