Classroom Management Strategies: the Impact on Student

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Classroom Management Strategies: the Impact on Student CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT by Hope Kathryn Sowell Liberty University A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Liberty University November, 2013 CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: THE IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT By Hope Kathryn Sowell A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Liberty University, Lynchburg Virginia November, 2013 APPROVED BY: CONSTANCE PEARSON, Ed.D, Committee Chair GEORGIA EVANS , Ed.D, Committee Member MICHAEL SCLABRA, Ed.D. Committee Member Scott B. Watson, PhD, Associate Dean of Advanced Programs CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: THE IMPACT ON SCHOOLS. ABSTRACT The purpose of this causal comparative study was to test the theoretical Classroom Management Teacher Behavior Continuum of Wolfgang and Glickman (1980) that suggests that interventionist, noninterventionist, and interactionalist classrooms may differ in student outcomes. This study explored whether student outcomes in statewide standardized tests reading, English language arts, and math differ by interventionist, noninterventionist, or interactionalist teacher instruction management (IM) and behavior management (BM) styles. Survey data from eighty-three 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade teachers regarding instructional and behavioral classroom management beliefs were contrasted in the percentage students passing standardized tests of reading, ELA, and math using MANOVA at a threshold of p < .05. Student performance did not significantly differ by IM style, while interactionalist BM classrooms had a significantly higher percentage of student passing statewide tests of math, reading, and ELA than interventionist classrooms. This line of investigation is important towards fostering best practices for teachers and optimal outcomes for elementary school students. Key Terms: Classroom Management, Proactive, Reactive, Interventionist, Noninterventionist, Interactionalist. iii Acknowledgements I thank God and my Savior Jesus Christ for walking by my side on this long journey. I would like to thank my husband, my daughter, and my mother for all their support, prayers, encouragements, patience, energy, and hard work in helping me accomplish this goal. I would like to thank my countless friends and my editor that cheered me along the way. Finally, I would like to thank all the members of my committee, in particular Dr. Pearson and Dr. Szapkiw, for lifting me up and spiritually taking this journey with me. May God Bless you all! iv Table of Contents Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv List of Figures .................................................................................................................... xi List of Tables .................................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................................................... 4 Problem Statement ........................................................................................................ 8 Purpose Statement ....................................................................................................... 10 Significance of the Study ............................................................................................ 12 Research Questions and Null Hypotheses .................................................................. 13 Research Question 1: Instructional Management and Student Outcomes ............ 13 Research Question 1a ............................................................................................ 13 Research Question 1b ........................................................................................... 13 Research Question 1c ............................................................................................ 14 Research Question 2: Behavior Management and Student Outcomes .................. 14 Research Question 2a ............................................................................................ 14 Research Question 2b ........................................................................................... 14 Research Question 2c ............................................................................................ 15 Null Hypothesis 1 ................................................................................................. 15 v Null Hypothesis 2 ................................................................................................. 16 Identification of Variables .......................................................................................... 17 Operational Definitions ............................................................................................... 18 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................... 22 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 22 Theoretical Framework: Classroom Management Approaches .................................. 25 Interventionist Classroom Management ..................................................................... 26 B.F. Skinner .......................................................................................................... 26 Albert Bandura ...................................................................................................... 28 Rudolf Dreikurs .................................................................................................... 29 Lee Canter ............................................................................................................. 30 Summary of Interventionist Classroom Management .......................................... 32 Noninterventionist Classroom Management............................................................... 33 Carl Rogers ........................................................................................................... 33 Jacob Kounin ........................................................................................................ 34 Harry Wong .......................................................................................................... 35 Summary of Nonnterventionist Classroom Management ..................................... 36 Interactionalist Classroom Management..................................................................... 36 William Glasser .................................................................................................... 36 Summary of Interactionalist Classroom Management .......................................... 38 vi Empirical Research on Classroom Management ........................................................ 38 Summary of Reviewed Literature ............................................................................... 44 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY ......................................................................... 46 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 46 Research Design.......................................................................................................... 46 Research Questions ..................................................................................................... 48 Research Question 1: Instructional Management and Student Outcomes ............ 48 Research Question 1a ............................................................................................ 48 Research Question 1b ........................................................................................... 49 Research Question 1c ............................................................................................ 49 Research Question 2: Behavior Management and Student Outcomes .................. 49 Research Question 2a ............................................................................................ 49 Research Question 2b ........................................................................................... 49 Research Question 2c ............................................................................................ 50 Null Hypothesis 1 ................................................................................................. 50 Null Hypothesis 2 ................................................................................................. 51 Participants .................................................................................................................. 52 Setting/Site .................................................................................................................. 53 Instrumentation ........................................................................................................... 54 Demographic Survey ............................................................................................ 54 The Behavioral and Instructional Management
Recommended publications
  • Punishment on Trial √ Feel Guilty When You Punish Your Child for Some Misbehavior, but Have Ennio Been Told That Such Is Bad Parenting?
    PunishmentPunishment onon TrialTrial Cipani PunishmentPunishment onon TrialTrial Do you: √ believe that extreme child misbehaviors necessitate physical punishment? √ equate spanking with punishment? √ believe punishment does not work for your child? √ hear from professionals that punishing children for misbehavior is abusive and doesn’t even work? Punishment on Trial Punishment on √ feel guilty when you punish your child for some misbehavior, but have Ennio been told that such is bad parenting? If you answered “yes” to one or more of the above questions, this book may Cipani be just the definitive resource you need. Punishment is a controversial topic that parents face daily: To use or not to use? Professionals, parents, and teachers need answers that are based on factual information. This book, Punishment on Trial, provides that source. Effective punishment can take many forms, most of which do not involve physical punishment. This book brings a blend of science, clinical experience, and logic to a discussion of the efficacy of punishment for child behavior problems. Dr. Cipani is a licensed psychologist with over 25 years of experience working with children and adults. He is the author of numerous books on child behavior, and is a full professor in clinical psychology at Alliant International University in Fresno, California. 52495 Context Press $24.95 9 781878 978516 1-878978-51-9 A Resource Guide to Child Discipline i Punishment on Trial ii iii Punishment on Trial Ennio Cipani Alliant International University CONTEXT PRESS Reno, Nevada iv ________________________________________________________________________ Punishment on Trial Paperback pp. 137 Distributed by New Harbinger Publications, Inc. ________________________________________________________________________ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cipani, Ennio.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Behavioral Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment
    This is a sample from FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT: A COMPLETE SYSTEM FOR EDUCATION AND MENTAL HEALTH SETTINGS, THIRD EDITION Functional Behavioral Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment © Springer Publishing Company This is a sample from FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT: A COMPLETE SYSTEM FOR EDUCATION AND MENTAL HEALTH SETTINGS, THIRD EDITION Ennio Cipani, PhD, is a licensed psychologist in California since 1983. He has been doing in-home and in-school behavioral consultation for children with problem behaviors for four decades. Dr. Cipani has published numerous articles, chapters, books, and software in the areas of child behavior management and parent and teacher behavioral consultation. He coauthored Behavioral Classification System for Problem Behaviors in Schools: A Diagnostic Manual (Springer Publishing, 2017). © Springer Publishing Company This is a sample from FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT: A COMPLETE SYSTEM FOR EDUCATION AND MENTAL HEALTH SETTINGS, THIRD EDITION Functional Behavioral Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment A Complete System for Education and Mental Health Settings Third Edition Ennio Cipani, PhD © Springer Publishing Company This is a sample from FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT: A COMPLETE SYSTEM FOR EDUCATION AND MENTAL HEALTH SETTINGS, THIRD EDITION Copyright © 2018 Springer Publishing Company, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Springer Publishing Company, LLC, or authorization through payment of the appropriate fees to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, [email protected] or on the Web at www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits and Drawbacks of Behavioral Management Plans in Therapeutic Day Schools Bruce A
    Governors State University OPUS Open Portal to University Scholarship All Capstone Projects Student Capstone Projects Spring 2015 The Benefits and Drawbacks of Behavioral Management Plans in Therapeutic Day Schools Bruce A. Korensky Governors State University Follow this and additional works at: http://opus.govst.edu/capstones Part of the Special Education and Teaching Commons Recommended Citation Korensky, Bruce A., "The Benefits nda Drawbacks of Behavioral Management Plans in Therapeutic Day Schools" (2015). All Capstone Projects. 115. http://opus.govst.edu/capstones/115 For more information about the academic degree, extended learning, and certificate programs of Governors State University, go to http://www.govst.edu/Academics/Degree_Programs_and_Certifications/ Visit the Governors State Multicategorical Special Education Department This Project Summary is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Capstone Projects at OPUS Open Portal to University Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of OPUS Open Portal to University Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEHAVIORAL MANAGEMENT PLANS Acknowledgements I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the people who have helped me complete this study. My most sincere thanks goes to Dr. Phil ip Boudreau for helping me to achieve the best possible results on this project. His consistent direction on writing this study properly is sincerely appreciated. J would also li ke to thank the professors at Governor State University who have helped me to build the knowledge base to complete this challenging work. Dr. Kasik, Dr. Chang, and Mr. Bierdz, all deserve great appreciation for bui lding my knowledge in the field of special education.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Behavior Analysis SUBSPECIALTY AREAS
    Applied Behavior Analysis SUBSPECIALTY AREAS TABLE OF CONTENTS BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT OF AUTISM AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ...........................2 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT ..........................2 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN BRAIN INJURY REHABILITATION ................................................3 BEHAVIORAL GERONTOLOGY ...................................................3 CLINICAL BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS .................................................4 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN EDUCATION ........................................4 BEHAVIORAL SPORT PSYCHOLOGY .........................................5 PREVENTION AND BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION OF CHILD MALTREATMENT ..............................6 BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS ..................................................6 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY ...........................................7 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN HEALTH AND FITNESS ........................7 BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS..........................................................8 Version 01/2021 APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS | SUBSPECIALTY AREAS This document provides summaries of many major subspecialty areas in Applied Behavior Analysis. The content was developed by experts who currently work in these areas. BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT OF AUTISM AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Applied behavior analysis (ABA) is best known for its success in treating individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental disabilities (e.g., Down syndrome, intellectual disabilities).
    [Show full text]
  • BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE: Tales of Inspiration, Discovery, and Service
    CHAPTER EXCERPTS BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE: Tales of Inspiration, Discovery, and Service Teodoro Ayllon l Carl Binder l Andy Bondy l Abigail Calkin l Aubrey Daniels E. Scott Geller l Robert Holdsambeck l Kent Johnson l Richard Malott Terry McSween l Francis Mechner l Henry Pennypacker l Karen Pryor l Kurt Salzinger Murray Sidman l Tristram Smith l Beth Sulzer-Azaroff l Travis Thompson Edited by R.D. Holdsambeck and H.S. Pennypacker ITY SC N IE A N M CAMBRIDGE CENTER C U E FOR H E BEHAVIORAL STUDIES D N UCATIO Behavioral Science: Tales of Inspiration, Discovery, and Service contents Contents Preface ix 1. Aubrey Daniels, Taking Behavior Analysis to Work 1 2. Tristram Smith, The Longest Journey 13 3. Karen Pryor, Inside and Outside Behavior Analysis 35 4. Henry Pennypacker, Reinforcement in the Key of C 51 5. Andy Bondy, Picture This 67 6. E. Scott Geller, Driven to Make a Difference 81 7. Teodoro Ayllon, Present at the Creation of Applied Behavior Analysis 105 8. Kurt Salzinger, Barking Up the Right Tree 117 9. Beth Sulzer-Azaroff, The Journey of a Pioneer Woman Applied Behavior Analyst 139 10. Murray Sidman, The Analysis of Behavior: What’s In It for Us? 167 11. Robert Holdsambeck, Special Children 177 12. Kent Johnson, Behavior Analysts Can Thrive in General Education Too 193 13. Abigail B. Calkin, Always the Back Door 215 14. Francis Mechner, Some Historic Roots of School Reform 231 15. Terry McSween, Journey Through Behavioral Safety 255 16. Carl Binder, Teachers and Students Passing it On 265 17. Richard Malott, What Makes Dick So Weird? 291 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Punishment Strategies: First Choice Or Last Resort
    Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals (JAASEP) Punishment Strategies: First Choice or Last Resort Twila Lukowiak, Ed.D Assistant Professor Jennifer Bridges Graduate Student Bradley University Abstract Is it appropriate to implement punishment strategies in the home and school settings when children display disrespectful and inappropriate behaviors? This article depicts the advantages and disadvantages of teachers and parents utilizing an array of punishment strategies including: (a) reprimands, (b) response cost, (c) timeout, and (d) corporal punishment. It is critical that educators and parents know the advantages and disadvantages of each of the punishment strategies so that they can make well informed, knowledgeable decisions. Punishment Strategies: First Choice or Last Resort Should teachers and parents dare utter the “p” word in regard to behavioral strategies for students who repeatedly display an array of inappropriate behaviors? The “p” word in this article referring to the often criticized and denounced word “punishment.” According to Bos and Vaughn (2006), the definition of punishment is when a teacher or parent follows a “behavior with a consequence that decreases the strength of the behavior or reduces the likelihood that the behavior will continue to occur” (41). What do teachers or parents do when students are making minimal behavioral improvements with the utilization of positive behavioral strategies? Is it appropriate to consider implementing punishment type behavioral strategies when severe tantrums or aggressive behaviors occur on a continuous basis? This article examines information that all educators and parents should know so that they can weigh the positive and negative attributes of the following selected behavioral strategies: (a) reprimands, (b) response cost, (c) timeout, and (d) corporal punishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Operants Fourth Quarter
    ISSN 2476-0293 OperantsQUARTER IV, 2016 In the 1930’s, young B. F. Skinner built his first apparatus to study behavior using rats as subjects. Today, scientists are designing experiments where rats are making “selfies” and playing basketball, giraffes are sticking their blue tongues out, and primates are learning to cooperate –– all to advance the science of behavior that Skinner started. from the president eople sometimes ask “Why doesn’t everyone talk with newscasters’ grammar and pronunciation?” We certainly often hear their talk. The answer, not surprisingly, is given in B. F. Skinner’s 1957 Pbook Verbal Behavior. Skinner makes it clear that children do not learn to talk by listening. They must make sounds from which specific forms are selected. The selected forms also include grammatical structures. For many years, certain linguists insisted that grammatical rules were innate. They argued that these rules determine how we speak. But recent published studies by scholars of language have shown these theories wrong. Linguists now propose a “usage-based approach to language acquisition.” Like Skinner, they argue that talking comes first. Rules describe the structures talkers use. Children acquire grammatical forms through talking with others. Skinner would not, however, explain a child’s language development as due to inferred “learning mechanisms in a developing brain.” Rather Skinner would talk of caregivers shaping both pronunciation and grammar. The verbal community reinforces forms that may, or may not, sound the way newscasters talk. Julie S. Vargas, Ph.D. President, B. F. Skinner Foundation Chinese Simplified Translated by Coco Yang Liu 人们有时候会问:“为什么大家不按照新闻播音员的语法和发音那样讲话?”我们当然经常听到这样的言论,而毫不奇怪,我们能 在B.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence-Based Practices for Classroom and Behavior Management: Tier 2 and Tier 3 Strategies
    Innovation Configuration Evidence-Based Practices for Classroom and Behavior Management: Tier 2 and Tier 3 Strategies Nicholas A. Gage University of Florida June 2015 CEEDAR Document No. IC-15 www.ceedar.org Disclaimer: This content was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Award No. H325A120003. Bonnie Jones and David Guardino serve as the project officers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or polices of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service, or enterprise mentioned in this website is intended or should be inferred. Recommended Citation: Gage, N.A. (2015). Evidence-based practices for classroom and behavior management: Tier 2 and Tier 3 strategies (Document No. IC-15). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/ Note: There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please use the proper citation above. Page 2 of 39 Table of Contents Innovation Configuration for Evidence-Based Practices for Classroom and Behavior Management: Tier 2 and Tier 3 Strategies .................................................................................. 4 Secondary Interventions .............................................................................................................. 7 Check In/Check Out ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Group Contingency Strategy on Students' Behaviors In
    Effects of Group Contingency Strategy Paper : Pedagogy The Effects of Group Contingency Strategy on Students’ Behaviors in Physical Education Classes in Korea Using Multiple Baseline Design Joo-Hyug Jung *, Suroto*, Yoshihiko Fukugasako**, and Takeo Takahashi*** *Doctoral Program in Health and Sport Science, University of Tsukuba [email protected] **Graduate School of Sport System, Kokushikan University 7-3-1 Nagayama, Tama, Tokyo 206-8515 Japan ***Institute of Health and Sport Science, University of Tsukuba 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8574 Japan [Received September 28, 2004 ; Accepted February 28, 2005] The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a group contingency strategy on student behaviors in elementary physical education classes. The study was conducted in an elementary school within metropolitan Korea. Eighty 6th-grade students (2 classes) and one teacher participated in this study. To investigate the effects of group contingency (intervention), two classes were separately designated as the experimental group (n=40) and control group (n=40). A multiple-baseline design across student target behaviors was used to determine the effects of exposure to behavioral intervention on student behaviors. Comparison was also made with the absence of the intervention. Data collected through each class observation and videotaping of 17 lessons of ball game and gymnastics showed that a group contingency strategy was effective in increasing the percentage of on-task behavior (motor activity) and reducing student waiting time and off-task in the experimental group. Compared to the experimental group, the control group showed no significant behavioral changes. Results also showed that the strategy was effective in decreasing inappropriate behavior and increasing appropriate behavior, which consequently builds on new forms of behavior by applying these contingencies consistently with effective consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Skinner As Self-Manager
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS 1997, 30, 545±568 NUMBER 3(FALL 1997) SKINNER AS SELF-MANAGER ROBERT EPSTEIN CAMBRIDGE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL STUDIES AND SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY B. F. Skinner was a remarkably productive, creative, and happy individual, in large part because of his expertise in self-management, a set of self-change skills that derive to some extent from his own scienti®c and theoretical work. Skinner's ardent defense of deter- minism appears to con¯ict with his views on self-control; although determinism can be reconciled with these views, we would be best served by dispensing with the ``ism'' and focusing instead on relevant data and data-driven theories. Contemporary research on self-control has diverged from Skinner's formulation in a number of ways, especially in focusing on cognition and choice. The extraordinary success Skinner had in applying self-management principles to his life should inspire us to take a closer look at the potential value such principles may have for society. DESCRIPTORS: B. F. Skinner, self-control, self-management Give a man a ®sh and he won't be hun- Skinner was, and still is, controversial. His gry. book, Beyond Freedom and Dignity, was a Teach a man to ®sh and he will never best-seller in 1971, but most of the reviews be hungry. were caustic. Skinner was a fascist, some The Talmud said. His views were Machiavellian. He would rob us of our freedom and our dignity Two decades ago, when I was 23, my and use the behavioral sciences to control mother announced to the members of her our every move (consider Agnew, 1972; mah-jongg club that I was spending the Chomsky, 1971; Claiborne, 1971; Marwell, summer working with B.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Positive Behavior Support for the Classroom
    Universal PBS for Classroom p. 1 Universal Positive Behavior Support for the Classroom Lori Newcomer University of Missouri To date, over 7,000 schools are implementing schoolwide systems of positive behavior support (SWPBS). At the universal/primary tier, these schools create a foundation of support to prevent problem behavior and academic failure for all students. This preventive approach can decrease the frequency of problem behaviors and reduce the development of more serious problems with students at risK. For those students who do not respond to the universal supports, secondary and tertiary interventions extend the continuum of supports available to improve social and academic outcomes. A crucial setting for primary systems of support is the classroom; however, primary supports at the classroom level often receive the least amount of attention and present the greatest inconsistencies in implementation. If schools are to maximize efforts at the primary level, universal systems of support in the classroom must be addressed. Effective, evidence based management strategies are the foundation of primary interventions in the classroom setting. Because there is a significant relationship between student behavior in the classroom and the surrounding environment (Kern & Clemons, 2007; Kern, Gallagher, Starosta, HicKman & George, 2006; Newcomer & Lewis, 2004; Thomas, BecKer, & Armstrong, 1968), proactive classroom management strategies focus on creating an environment structured to (a) identify, teach and encourage the behaviors that will
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior Analysis: No Defense Required
    Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education Volume 1 Number 6 Electronic Journal for Inclusive Article 3 Education Vol. 1, No. 6 (Fall 2002) Fall 2002 Behavior Analysis: No Defense Required James D. Dunne Ph.D. Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ejie Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Disability and Equity in Education Commons, Special Education Administration Commons, and the Special Education and Teaching Commons Repository Citation Dunne, J. D. (2002). Behavior Analysis: No Defense Required, Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 1 (6). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dunne: Behavior Analysis: No Defense Required Wright State University Abstract Many people, professional educators and others, criticize what they call behavior modification because they believe it applies only to animals or people with disabilities and represents little more than the application of good common sense. This paper argues that behavior modification, more accurately called behavior analysis, has produced many procedures that apply to the behavior of people with and without disabilities across a variety of settings. This paper examines 4 behavior analytic teaching strategies (Personalized System of Instruction, Programmed Instruction, Direct Instruction, and Precision Teaching) to illustrate the sophistication and wide application of behavior analysis. It concludes that such behavior analytic approaches to teaching apply to people of all abilities and that rather than reflecting mere common sense, they emanate from sound research that demonstrates their effectiveness.
    [Show full text]