DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist M L N U T. E. S. ANNUAL CONFERENCES - Tº METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH FALL CONFERENCES OF 1895. º tº ºsºº 288 CENTRAL GERMAN CONFERENCE, 1895. CENTRAL G E R MAN CONFERENCE, Held in Cincinnati, O., Sept. 4-9, 1895. BISHOP FOSS, Presiding. J. H. HORST, Secretary. Post office of Secretary, Louisville, Ky. gatzky, Holtkamp, Quest. 21. What other Persona" QUEst. 1. Who have been Received John H. John C. Guenther—4. Motation should be made 2 by Transfer, and from what Con The orders of Otto Gilbert, an ..ferences QUEst. 10. What Members have J. Griewe, elder, from the Evangelical William F. from North Completed Luther the Conference Course Church, recognized; ern German: Franklin Ohlinger, Study? an were the of orders of Henry Huelster, an elder, from Japan—2. (a) Elected and Ordained Elders this year. from the Evangelical Association, Who have been Read recognized. QUEst. 2. Johannes, were mitted & Frederick John Muel ler, August J. Weigle, Karl B. Supernu None. QUEst. 22. Who are the Koch, Henry Metzger, Frederick merary Preachers 2 J. Baumann, Paul Wuerfel, David QUEst. 3. Who have been Received Dangel, 'Louis S. Katterhenry, George Berg, J. C. Egley,gley H. B. Credentials, E. lº,"; on and from what Kapsch—10. Churches 3 Frederick J. None. Superan (b) Elected and Ordained Elders previ. QUEst. 23. Who are the ously. nºtated I’’earchers 2 QUEst. 4. Who have been Received None. J. G. Reiber, Willian Geyer, on Trial * William Ahrens, Christian Vogel, (a) In Studies of First Year. QUEst. 11. What others have been G. A. Brenring, P. B. Becker, En Blected and Ordained Deacons? Riemenschneider, Daniel Harrer, John Beck, C. F. Charles E. Buerkle–3. (a) As Local Preachers. flºº."Heitmeyer, F. A. Hoff, Jacob Ga ble, Ruff, Hermann Beyer. Frederick J. V. Jahraus, C. G. Fritsche, Sr., Gustav Ber (b) In studies of Third Year. Missionary None. (b) Under Rule. tram, John Schneider, Henry Bud None. denbaum, William Borcherding, Henry Krill, Lukemeyer, Quest. 5. Who have been Continued J. H. G. on Trial A Quest. 12. What others have been F. Friedler, Conrad Wehnes, Au Elected and Ordained Elders & Barth, Studies of First Year. st Gerlach, J. H. Karl A. (a) In I,ocal None. (a) As Deacons. ilitzer, John Hass—25. None. (b) In Studies of Second Year. Quest. 24. Who are the Triers of (b) Under Missionary Rule. Appeals Henry Bornemann, Ernst Muel & None. Hiller, Huber, ler, Hermann Beyer, Emil Boch J. E. J. W. Jo —4 seph Kern, G. Weiler, A. Graessle, 13. Was the Character Year. Quest. of Jacob Braun, George Schwinn–7. (c) In Studies of Third each Preacher Examined P None. This was strictly done, as the QUEst. 25. What is the Statistical (d) In Studies of Fourth Year. name of each Preacher was called Report for this year? None. in open Conference. (See tabulated statement, p. 444.) QUEst. 6. Who have been Discon Quest. 14. Who hare been Trans QUEst. 26. What is the Aggregate tin, ued P ferred, and to what Conferences? of the Benevolent Collections as None. None. reported by the Conference Treas turer? QUEST. 7. Who have been Admitted Quest. 15. Who have Died ? $29,414.85. into Full Membership f Nachtrieb, Carl Lurker, Gottlieb QUEst. 27. What are the Claims (a) Elected and Ordained Deacons this Henry Liebhart, year. Theodore Schu on the Conference Fund £ mann, E. T. Wunderlich, P. F. $4,629. Henry B. Roller. Schneider–6. (b) Elected and Ordained Deacons pre (See obituaries, p. 416.) QUEST. 28. What has been Received viously. on these Claims, and how has it Frederick W. Mueller, Edward Quest. 16. Who have been Located been Applied ? W. Strecker, William F. Hayn–3. at their own request 2 $4,629, None. which has been applied under or QUEst. 8. What Members are in der of the Conference. Studies of Third Year? QUEst. 17. Who have been Located 2 (a) Admitted into Full Membership this None. Quest. 29. Where are the Preach year. ers Stationed P Frederick W. Mueller. Edward QUEst. 18. Who have Withdrawn 2 [These appointments are all in the State W. Strecker, Henry B. Roller—3. None. except as otherwise indica ted.fºllo, (b) Admitted into Full Membership pre QUEst. 19. Who have been permitted CINCINNATI DISTRICT. viously. Charges to Withdraw under or S. SchNEIDER, P. E. William F. Hayn. Complaints J. 2 O., Newport, Ky.) None. (P. QUEst. 9. What Members are in Batesville and Brookville (Ind.), Studies of Fourth Year? Quest. 20. Who have been Erpelled? William Reichemeyer, Ernst Conrad Boecklin, William Ro None. Mueller. CENTRAL GERMAN CONFERENCE, 1895. 289 Chillicothe and Waverly, W. E. Huntington (Ind.), Geo. Schwinn. Toledo (O.): East Side and Per Nocka. Jeffersonville, (ind.), C. E. Sever rysburg, J. J. Link. Cincinnati: Everett Street, John inghaus. Galena Street, Hermann Beyer. Detjen. Louisville (Ky.) : Breckinridge Segur Avenue, David Graessle. Mount Auburn, B. F. Beal. Street, H. G. Lich. Walnut Street, J. J. Bock Race Street, Frederick Cramer. Eighteenth Street, Frederick Jo stahler. Spring Grove Avenue, Franklin hannes. Oillinger. Jefferson Street, J. E. Braun. NORTH OHIO DISTRICT. Third Church, Chas. Treuschel. Market Street, J. II. Horst. J. G. SchALL, P. E. Walnut Hills, J. C. Wuester. Madison (Ind.), C. G. Fritsche, Jr. (P. O., Berea, 0.) Covington (Ky.), O., Philip, Ind.), G. E. Hiller. Mars (P. Saint Akron, Dayton, Elias Roser. H. E. Wulzen. William Andree. Allegheny City (Pa.), Greenville and Piqua, F. J. Mount Vernon (Ind.), Louis Mil Carl Bozen Kapsch. ler. hart. Baresville, Hamilton, John Claus. Nashville (Tenn.), C. G. Herzer. John Kuster. Berea, Meyer. Indianapolis (Ind.): First Church Albany (Ind.), J. W. Hu John and Third Church, W. F. Nº.or. Bucyrus, F. A. Schumann. Chili, Grie we and John Mueller. Salem (Ind.), J. C. Guenther. Canal Dover and F. J. Bau lilan il. Nippert Memorial, Henry Borne Santa Claus (Ind.), Adam Schantz *nºt* **. enbaecher. Clarington, A. C. Baur. Bethany, Second Church, A. F. Zarwell. Seymour (Ind.), Andrew Graessle. Cleveland: F. W. Muel ler. Ironton and Zion, Mathias George. White Creek (Ind.), L. S. Katter Emanuel, Lafayette (Ind.), J. H. Schimmel henry. E. W. Bockstahler. pfennig. First Church, Henry Pullmann. Lawrenceburg (Ind.), E. W. MICHIGAN DISTRICT. Saint Paul, J. R. Bodmer. Columbus, fierman fierzer. Strecker. Louis ALLINGER, P. E. Healthy, Delaware, Henry Metzger. Mount William Jauch. (P. O., Detroit, Mich.) Newport J. J. Baechtold. Galion, C. O. Klock-iem. Allegan (Mich.), George Bonn, Henry Pomeroy, P. J. Graessle. Mitter. Marietta and Jend. Portsmouth,º Schruff. Ann Arbor (Mich.), J. C. Speck Marion, C. E. Ploch. W. A. lilan. Circuit, Terre Haute (Ind.), F. A. Hamp. Marion John Hueneke. (Ind.), McKeesport (Pa.), Nast, Honorary Auburn and Garrett to be J. H. Holt William Editor of supplied. kamp. Christian Apologist—member of Bay City (Mich.), Jacob Braun. Monroefield, John Beck. Race Street, Cincinnati, Quar Berne (Mich.), Christian Spaeth. New Knoxville, Max Dieterle. terly Conference. Defiance, Edward Krass. Pittsburg: , East Liberty, C. Nast, J. A. J. Editor of Christian Detroit (Much.): First Church, Gerlach. Apologist—member of Everett Oscar Rogatzky. First Church, F. W. Schneider. Street, Cincinnati, Quarterly Second Church, Ernst Werner. Second Church, Richard Plue Conference. City Mission, W. F. Hayw. demann. Christian Golder, Assistant Editor DeWitt (Mich.), Andrew §yer. Sandusky and LaCarne, Frederick of Christian Apologist–member Eden (O.), D. E. Dangel. Mersfelder, Daniel Harrºr. of Walnut Hills, Cincinnati, Elmore Herman Rogatzky. Spencerville (O.), J. C. Gommel. Quarterly Conference. Francisco''{(Mich.), Paul Wuerfel. Vermillion, Jacob Boekstahler. Freeport (Mich.), (W.Va.), Herman Grenzenberg, Editor of William Iſo Wºling Gustav Wei Wegweiser—member of Mount gatzky. er. Goshen Conrad Boecklin. Auburn, Cincinnati, Quarterly Karl Riemenschneider, President; Conference. Grand tº:Rapids (Mich.), Joseph Kern. J Berr, Professor; J. C. Marting, and Finan. LOUISVILLE DISTRICT. Holt (Mich.), George Wahl. Treasurer (Ind.), cial Agent, of German Wallace Rothweiler, Kendal ville David Dobb College JAcob P. E. rick. — members of Berea (P. O., New Albany, Ind.) Quarterly Conference. Lansing (Mich.), Karl Koch. Bedford A. J. Weigle. Marine City (Mich.), K. B. Koch. J. C. Weidmann, Superintendent Booneville (iii.). C. W. Helwig. Montague and Muskegon (Mich.), of Berea Orphan Asylum—mem º(Ind.), Allinger. ber of Berea Quarterly Confer Bradford Jacob Marquardt, J. A. Emil Boch. elice. Cannelton and Tell City, W. J. G. Petoskey (Mich.), to be supplied. Bochstahler, C. H. Miller. Roseville (Mich.), Fred. Kuhnle. C. F. Kupfer, Missionary in China. Charleston (Ind.), to be Saginaw, East Side, and Kochville Evansville (Ind.): First!".Church, (Mich.), Christian Baumann, C. QUEST. 30. Where shall the next J. F. Severinghaus. A'. Buerkle. Conference be held 2 Mission, George Kaletsch. Stryker (O.), B. E. E. Fishbach. In Newport, Ky..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Step up to Leadership at General Conference
    The United Methodist Church: Governance and Structure GOVERNANCE United Methodists are sometimes asked where their church is headquartered, or what officer is “in charge.” Deliberately, The United Methodist Church has no single central office, no archbishop, no pope. This reflects the representative nature of the church's organization – which also provides a system of checks and balances. The church created a system that in some ways parallels that of the U.S. government when it came to America. The church has a General Conference, its legislative branch; a Council of Bishops, somewhat like an executive branch; and a nine-member Judicial Council, the judicial branch. It’s helpful to recognize the structure of the church, but it is the mission, ministry and love of God through Jesus Christ that is of primary importance. GENERAL CONFERENCE Who makes decisions for The United Methodist Church if there is no one person in charge? Good question. The only body that can set official policy and speak for the denomination is the General Conference. The General Conference is an international body of nearly 1,000 delegates that meets every four years. The delegates are elected by annual conferences (at annual conference sessions) to attend General Conference. They represent all annual conferences around the world. Half of the delegates are laity (non-clergy members), half are clergy. Bishops attend the General Conference but cannot vote. Different bishops serve as presiding officers during the conference. Other bishops cannot speak unless permission is specifically granted by the delegates. During General Conference, delegates discuss and vote on petitions and resolutions proposed by individuals, agencies, annual conferences, and other groups within the denomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Conferences in the Seventh-Day Adventist
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2009 [Black] Regional Conferences in the Seventh-Day Adventist (SDA) Church Compared with United Methodist [Black] Central Jurisdiction/Annual Conferences with White SDA Conferences, From 1940 - 2001 Alfonzo Greene, Jr. Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Greene, Jr., Alfonzo, "[Black] Regional Conferences in the Seventh-Day Adventist (SDA) Church Compared with United Methodist [Black] Central Jurisdiction/Annual Conferences with White SDA Conferences, From 1940 - 2001" (2009). Dissertations. 160. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/160 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2009 Alfonzo Greene, Jr. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO [BLACK] REGIONAL CONFERENCES IN THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH (SDA) COMPARED WITH UNITED METHODIST [BLACK] CENTRAL JURISDICTION/ANNUAL CONFERENCES WITH WHITE S.D.A. CONFERENCES, FROM 1940-2001 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN HISTORY BY ALFONZO GREENE, JR. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20Th and 21St Century
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto ASPECTS OF ARMINIAN SOTERIOLOGY IN METHODIST-LUTHERAN ECUMENICAL DIALOGUES IN 20TH AND 21ST CENTURY Mikko Satama Master’s Thesis University of Helsinki Faculty of Theology Department of Systematic Theology Ecumenical Studies 18th January 2009 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO − HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET Tiedekunta/Osasto − Fakultet/Sektion Laitos − Institution Teologinen tiedekunta Systemaattisen teologian laitos Tekijä − Författare Mikko Satama Työn nimi − Arbetets title Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20th and 21st Century Oppiaine − Läroämne Ekumeniikka Työn laji − Arbetets art Aika − Datum Sivumäärä − Sidoantal Pro Gradu -tutkielma 18.1.2009 94 Tiivistelmä − Referat The aim of this thesis is to analyse the key ecumenical dialogues between Methodists and Lutherans from the perspective of Arminian soteriology and Methodist theology in general. The primary research question is defined as: “To what extent do the dialogues under analysis relate to Arminian soteriology?” By seeking an answer to this question, new knowledge is sought on the current soteriological position of the Methodist-Lutheran dialogues, the contemporary Methodist theology and the commonalities between the Lutheran and Arminian understanding of soteriology. This way the soteriological picture of the Methodist-Lutheran discussions is clarified. The dialogues under analysis were selected on the basis of versatility. Firstly, the sole world organisation level dialogue was chosen: The Church – Community of Grace. Additionally, the document World Methodist Council and the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification is analysed as a supporting document. Secondly, a document concerning the discussions between two main-line churches in the United States of America was selected: Confessing Our Faith Together.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Workbook
    2021 CONFERENCE WORKBOOK June 13-15 www.ntcumc.org 2 NORTH TEXAS CONFERENCE WORKBOOK — 2021 Welcome to Annual Conference 2021! This Conference Workbook contains an agenda, program announcements, schedules, reports, and legislative proposals for the 2021 North Texas ANNUAL CONFERENCE in Plano, TX. VOTING MEMBERS: Lay and Clergy Members who are eligible to vote at District and Annual Conferences should contact their district offices if they have not received an email explaining registration. VISITORS: The sessions on Monday and Tuesday will be livestreamed. Visitors to Annual Conference may follow the lives- tream session of the meetings at https://ntcumc.org/annual-conference-2021, or on Facebook at https://www. facebook.com/ntcumc/. SUNDAY, June 13 3:00 pm Laity Session (ONLINE) No registration required. Follow at https://ntcumc.org/annual-conference-2021. 7:00 pm Opening Worship Service, Bishop Gregory Palmer preaching, St. Andrew UMC Plano sanctuary. LIVESTREAMED and Facebook MONDAY, June 14 9:00 am – 3:00 p.m. General session in the Sanctuary. LIVESTREAMED and Facebook 3:30 pm Ordination Service Rehearsal for All participants, St. Andrew UMC Plano sanctuary. 5:00 pm Dinners for all worship participants and special guests, St. Andrew UMC Plano, sanctuary. 7:00 pm The Service of Ordination and Commissioning, Bishop Michael McKee preaching, St. Andrew UMC Plano, sanctuary. LIVESTREAMED and Facebook TUESDAY, June 15 9:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. General session in the Sanctuary. LIVESTREAMED and Facebook PLEASE NOTE: If you want a bound, printed, 8 ½ x 11, black and white copy of the 2021 North Texas Conference Journal, you must complete the ORDER FORM located in the back of this work- book and mail it in OR purchase a copy ONLINE.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglicans and Old Catholics Serving in Europe 2019 Report
    Anglicans and Old Catholics Serving in Europe A Report of the Anglican–Old Catholic International Coordinating Council 2013–2019 to the Anglican Consultative Council 17 Hong Kong April/ May 2019 and the International Bishops’ Conference, Lublin June 2019 AOCICC Amersfoort 2013 Kilkenny 2014 Contents Preface by the Co-Chairs 5 Executive Summary 7 Members of the Council 2013–2019 8 1 Introduction 9 a Bonn 1931: Belonging together 9 b The context of Europe: Walking together in an evolving Europe 10 c The context of the ecumenical movement 11 2 The significance of the Bonn Agreement today 13 a An Anglican Communion perspective 13 b An Old Catholic perspective 14 3 The AOCICC’s story 1998–2019 16 4 Outworking of the AOCICC mandate 19 a The AOCICC’s work achieved 2013–2019 19 b. Mandate i: ‘To continue to explore the nature and meaning of our communion’ 20 Mandate ii: ‘To promote knowledge of our churches and their relationship’ 22 Mandate iii: ‘To assist the annual meeting of Old Catholic and Anglican bishops’ 27 Mandate iv: ‘To explore the possibility of establishing a representative body’ 30 Mandate v: ‘To advise on the establishment of appropriate instruments’ 32 Mandate vi: ‘To review the consistency of ecumenical agreements’ 34 5 Proposals for the next AOCICC mandate 36 For submission to ACC-17, 2019 36 Anglican–Old Catholic Relations 36 Appendix 1 – Communiqués 37 Appendix 2 45 Willibrord Declaration 2017 45 Endnotes 47 3 Zurich 2015 Ghent 2016 Preface by the Co-Chairs To the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) and the International Bishops’ Conference of Old Catholic Churches (IBC).
    [Show full text]
  • Current Structure of the United Methodist Church
    Current Structure of the United Methodist Church 3 Branches of Government 1. Legislative—Conference 2. Executive—Bishops 3. Judicial—Judicial Council Legislative • The Conference: The global United Methodist Church (UMC) is divided into conferences and regions for connection and accountability • The General Conference: is the official governing body of the UMC, akin to our nation’s congress. Regions around the world send elected delegates, equal number clergy and laity, to the session of General Conference, held every four years. The General Conference debates and votes upon petitions and resolutions seeking changes to our governing document, the Book of Discipline. o The Book of Discipline: consists of several different types of legislation. The constitution of the UMC can only be changed by a vote of General Conference and 2/3 ratification of all Annual Conferences globally. The Social Principles are ongoing discussions on our stance as a denomination on social issues, and it is very comprehensive. The articles of religion are our statement of core beliefs. And there are many pages detailing the administrative life of the church. o Special Session of General Conference: In February of 2019, a special session of General Conference has been called to specifically deal with the current division in our denomination on issues of theology, that have been manifested in our division on inclusion of the LGBTQ+ community. No other topic may be discussed or voted upon at the special session. • The Jurisdictional Conference: exists only with the UMC of the United States. The US UMC is divided up regionally: ▪ Northeastern (our jurisdiction) ▪ Southeastern ▪ North Central ▪ South Central ▪ Western o The Jurisdictional Conference is also made up of elected delegates, clergy and laity, from the Annual Conferences within the jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry Leadership Models Nurture, Outreach, Witness (N.O.W.) and Single Governance Board Structure
    Ministry Leadership Models Nurture, Outreach, Witness (N.O.W.) and Single Governance Board Structure © 2016 General Board of Discipleship. Permission is given for use in United Methodist congregations, districts, annual conferences, and camp settings. John 15: 1-14(NIV) 2 My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you. 13 Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. 14 You are my friends if you do what I command. © 2016 General Board of Discipleship. Permission is given for use in United Methodist congregations, districts, annual conferences, and camp settings. Thanks to Generous Givers This webinar is provided as a service of the Discipleship Ministries and is funded through generous World Service apportionment giving by local United Methodist congregations. © 2016 General Board of Discipleship. Permission is given for use in United Methodist congregations, districts, annual conferences, and camp settings. © 2016 General Board of Discipleship. Permission is given for use in United Methodist congregations, districts, annual conferences, and camp settings. The Presenters Jacqui King Jason Klees Leadership Ministries Webinar Specialist © 2016 General Board of Discipleship. Permission is given for use in United Methodist congregations, districts, annual conferences, and camp settings. Goals for this webinar: Review Leadership Steps to take to move Ministry Models forward Define Ministry Leadership Models • Nurture Outreach Witness (N.O.W.) • Single Board Governance • Church Council and Leadership Positions needed for each Ministry Model • “Steps to Take” – what is needed to implement the new Ministry Model • Resources / Prayers © 2016 General Board of Discipleship. Permission is given for use in United Methodist congregations, districts, annual conferences, and camp settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Separate Unions Formed One United Church by David Oberlin, 1979
    Two Separate Unions Formed One United Church by David Oberlin, 1979 The United Methodist Church is the product of two recent church mergers – one in 1946, which brought the Evangelical and United Brethren in Christ denominations together to form the Evangelical United Brethren Church (hereafter called the EUB Church); and one in 1968, which combined the EUB and Methodist denominations to form the United Methodist Church. Each merger created a new denomination, altered church organization, and had an impact on its membership. This paper examines these two mergers and their impact on members of affected congregations in Union County, Pennsylvania. Located in a rural setting in central Pennsylvania, Union County includes many small communities and two major towns – Lewisburg with almost 9,000 residents, and Mifflinburg with a population close to 7,000. Within the county are 17 United Methodist churches – three of which are former Methodist, and fourteen of which are former EUB. While the United Brethren in Christ Church was active in central Pennsylvania, all of the former EUB congregations in Union County were originally Evangelical. Each of the former Methodist congregations has its own pastor, and ten of the fourteen former EUB congregations make up three circuits within the county. Because there were no United Brethren in Christ churches in Union County, the 1946 merger did not have much of an impact on the congregations of the county. The 1968 merger, on the other hand, had a large impact in Union County because EUB and Methodist churches were located throughout the county. In Mifflinburg and Lewisburg, for example, the 1968 merger resulted in two United Methodist churches located within a block of each other.
    [Show full text]
  • CS-422 Theological Heritage 4: Wesleyan Movement Wesley
    CS-422 Theological Heritage 4: Wesleyan Movement Wesley Theological Seminary Course of Study General Board of Higher Education and Ministry Second Summer Term: July 13-17, 2020 Faculty: Rev. Joye F. Jones Email: [email protected] Course Description This course covers the significant individuals, decisive events, and theology of the Methodist movement. Utilizing categories of grace, faith, and holiness, the student will appropriate the Wesleyan heritage. Objectives 1. Understand and reflect on the movements, major figures, and events that led to the eighteenth century revivals, especially the lives and ministries of John and Charles Wesley. 2. Understand and articulate the vision of holiness and the theology of grace as it shaped the Wesleys, and the structures of the Methodist movement. 3. Identify and discuss significant theological and historical developments in American Methodism, including ordination and episcopacy. 4. Reflect theologically on our Wesleyan heritage and identity. Required Texts: • Heitzenrater Richard P., Wesley and the People Called Methodists. Second edition. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2013. • Maddox, Randy L. Responsible Grace: John Wesley's Practical Theology. Nashville: Kingswood Books, 1994. • Wigger, John H. American Saint: Francis Asbury and the Methodists. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009 Plus the following sermons found on http://wesley.nnu.edu/john-wesley/ (Note, all of these sermons are included in John Wesley’s Sermons, An Anthology edited by Outler & Heitzenrater, Abingdon Press, ©1987, 2nd printing, 1993.) “Free Grace” “On Working Out Our Own Salvation” “Scripture Way of Salvation” “Use of Money” “Witness of the Spirit II” And this article by John Wesley: “What is an Arminian” found on https://arminiantheologyblog.wordpress.com/category/john-wesley/ Optional Texts: None of these are required; they are listed in case you want to read more.
    [Show full text]
  • Wesleyan Covenant Association
    WESLEYAN COVENANT ASSOCIATION Confidence for the Future "Anyone who listens to my teaching and follows it is wise, like a person who builds a house on solid rock.” - Matthew 7:24 Confidence for the Future The Wesleyan Covenant Association (WCA) connects Spirit-filled, orthodox churches, clergy, and laity who hold to Wesleyan theology. It is an association or network of individuals and congregations who share a common understanding of our Wesleyan doctrine and desire to become a vibrant, faithful, growing 21st -century church. We believe change is coming to The United Methodist Church, and as we live into what comes next, the Wesleyan Covenant Association will connect, encourage, and resource clergy, laity, congregations, and regional chapters by: · Committing to the primary authority of Scripture and the Lordship of Jesus Christ · Creating a unified response to the Bishops’ Commission recommendation that would maintain traditional, orthodox Methodist beliefs · Developing a plan for a positive and faithful future The Wesleyan Covenant Association affirms the work of other renewal groups, such as The Confessing Movement, Good News, and UM Action. However, the WCA’s purpose is not to fight the political battles raging across the church, but to prepare for and live into a positive and fruitful future. “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” – John 8:12 1 Upholding Scriptural Authority and the Lordship of Jesus Christ The earliest Christian affirmation was “Jesus Christ is Lord” (Acts 2:36). This is the core belief that characterizes all Christians and defines discipleship.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodist Conferences Journal List
    Methodist Conferences List American Methodist Episcopal (A. M. E.) Church A. M. E. Church General Conference Journal: 1872, 1876, 1880, 1884, 1888, 1896, 1900, 1920, 1924, 1928, 1932, 1936, 1940, 1944, 1948, 1952, 1956, 1960, 1964, 1972(2), 1976 A. M. E. Church Board of Home & Foreign Missionary Department Quadrennial Report: 1944 to 1948 A. M. E. Church Missionary Annual: 1883, 1888-1892, 1897-1898, 1898-1899 A. M. E. Church Year Book: 1918(2), 1922-1923, 1930, 1935-1936, 1939-1940(2), 1948-1949, 1955(2) The A. M. E. Church Budget: 1881(2), 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885-1886(3), 1887-Centennial, 1886-1904(duplication), 1891(2), 1901(2) A. M. E. Church Annual Conference Combined Minute: 1951, 1977 1 Illinois Conference: 1943, 1944 Indiana Conference: 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868, 1869, 1870, 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1876, 1877, 1879 Missouri Conference: 1855, 1856, 1857 New England Conference: 1852, 1854, 1857, 1858, 1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1866, 1868, 1870, 1876 New Jersey Conference: 1893, 1896 New York Conference: 1865 Ohio Conference: 1850, 1852, 1862 Philadelphia Conference: 1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, 1865(2) South Ohio Conference: 1928 Southwest Missouri Conference: 1939 Tennessee Conference: 1934 West Tennessee Conference: 1926(2), 1929, 1938 2 American Methodist Episcopal Zion (A. M. E. Z.) Church General Conference Journal: 1892, 1904, 1936, 1940, 1944, 1948, 1952, 1956(2), 1964, 1968(2), 1972(2), 1980, 1996 Minutes of the Annual Conference: 1830, 1831, 1832, 1834, 1835, 1836, 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, 1843, 1846, 1852 British North America Conference: 1857 California Conference: 1895 Genesee Conference: 1858 New England Conference: 1862, 1863, 1867, 1870 New Jersey Conference: 1890, 1969, 1970, 1971 New York Conference: 1890, 1891, 1894, 1919 New York and New England Conference: 1855, 1857 Philadelphia and Baltimore Conference: 1911 3 Christian Methodist Episcopal (C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Why a New Book of Discipline?
    Why A New Book of Discipline? The Book of Discipline has served as the covenanting principles of the Methodist Church since its inception at the Christmas Conference in 1784, and of the United Methodist Church following the merger with the United Brethren Church and Methodist Church in 1968. The creation of The Connection, a new Discipline is an audacious proposal in the face of this long history and tradition. It begs the question: Why is a new Discipline necessary and desirable? You probably already know how challenging it can be to read, understand and find things in The current Book of Discipline. It wasn’t always this complicated. The Book of Discipline has grown by 2000% since 1828 and an additional 500% since 1960. Already the next general conference has 15% more legislation than the 2016 general conference to consider. These additions are now adding more rules and less innovation and fewer people on the Wesleyan Path, more hierarchy and less local decision making and fewer decisions to follow Jesus Christ. What kind of Discipline do you want? Would you want a book that was simplified, easy to read, and helps you find what you are looking for and wouldn’t require a lawyer, parliamentarian or course in polity to understand it? Imagine a simpler and clearer book that celebrates our rich Wesleyan theology, history and methods for being the church without watering it down by continually adding procedure and process. Does it feel like the denomination works for the local church, or does it feel like the congregation exists to work for the denomination? Imagine a book that sees the congregation as the primary unit for mission, and the denomination as a structure to support congregations.
    [Show full text]