View Official Source
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Approved Minutes September 19, 2018
Wednesday, September 19, 2018 Green Mountain Union High SD – Auditorium 716 VT Route 103 South Chester, Vermont 05143 September 19, 2018 Strategic Goals: (1) Ensure that Vermont’s public education system operates within the framework of high expectations for every learner and ensure that there is equity in opportunity for all. (2) Ensure that the public education system is stable, efficient, and responsive to changes and ever-changing population needs, economic and 21st century issues. Approved Minutes Present: State Board of Education (SBE): Krista Huling, Chair; William Mathis, Vice Chair; Mark Perrin; Peter Peltz; John O’Keefe; Callahan Beck; John Carroll; Kyle Courtois; Oliver Olsen; Dan French. Agency of Education (AOE): Donna Russo-Savage, Molly Bachman, Emily Simmons, Ted Fisher, Brad James, Bob Stafford, Maureen Gaidys. Others: Alice Laughlin, Putney; Laura Chapman, Putney; Dan MacArthur, Marlboro; Beth Bristol, Guilford; Ahren Ahrenholz, Dummerston; Rebecca Bartlett, Brattleboro; Jeff Cleary, Bennington-Rutland; Nancy Erikson, Saxtons River; Marilyn Mahusky, Chester; Kristina Naylor, Dummerston; Julie Forsythe, Putney; Becca Balint, Brattleboro; M Mall, Peacham; Edith Gould, Putney; Patrick Gilligan, Vernon-Guilford; Marie Gilligan; David M. Clark, WNESU; Emily Long, Newfane; Rick Holloway, Rockingham; Emily Pals, Putney; Anne Beekman, Putney; Jay Denault, Franklin; Jim Jewett, Franklin; Chris Pratt, WNESU; Jackie Wilson, BRSU; Sandy Morrison, Vernon; Rick Zamore, Guilford; Ines McGillion, Dummerston; Herve Pelletier, Putney; -
Transmittal Email to House and Senate Members
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 1:47 PM To: David Ainsworth; Robert Bancroft; John Bartholomew; Fred Baser; Lynn Batchelor; Scott Beck; Paul Belaski; Steve Beyor; Clem Bissonnette; Thomas Bock; Bill Botzow; Patrick Brennan; Tim Briglin; Cynthia Browning; Jessica Brumsted; Susan Buckholz; Tom Burditt; Mollie Burke; William Canfield; Stephen Carr; Robin Chesnut-Tangerman; Annmarie Christensen; Kevin Christie; Brian Cina; Selene Colburn; Jim Condon; Peter Conlon; Daniel Connor; Chip Conquest; Sarah CopelandHanzas; Timothy Corcoran; Larry Cupoli; Maureen Dakin; David Deen; Dennis Devereux; Eileen Dickinson; Anne Donahue; Johannah Donovan; Betsy Dunn; Alyson Eastman; Alice Emmons; Peter Fagan; Rachael Fields; Robert Forguites; Robert Frenier; Douglas Gage; Marianna Gamache; John Gannon; Marcia Gardner; Dylan Giambatista; Diana Gonzalez; Maxine Grad; Rodney Graham; Adam Greshin; Sandy Haas; James Harrison; Mike Hebert; Robert Helm; Mark Higley; Matthew Hill; Mary Hooper; Jay Hooper; Lori Houghton; Mary Howard; Ronald Hubert; Kimberly Jessup; Ben Jickling; Mitzi Johnson; Ben Joseph; Bernie Juskiewicz; Brian Keefe; Kathleen Keenan; Charlie Kimbell; Warren Kitzmiller; Jill Krowinski; Rob LaClair; Martin LaLonde; Diane Lanpher; Richard Lawrence; Paul Lefebvre; Patti Lewis; William Lippert; Emily Long; Gabrielle Lucke; Terence Macaig; Michael Marcotte; Marcia Martel; Jim Masland; Christopher Mattos; Curt McCormack; Patricia McCoy; Francis McFaun; Alice Miller; Kiah Morris; Mary Morrissey; Mike Mrowicki; Barbara Murphy; Linda Myers; Gary Nolan; Terry -
Vermont Environmental Scorecard 2013-2014 Legislative Biennium Vermont Environmental Scorecard
Vermont Environmental Scorecard 2013-2014 Legislative Biennium Vermont Environmental Scorecard Dear Vermonter, We have prepared this Scorecard to let you know how your state legislators voted on environmental issues in 2013-2014. The legislative process can be complicated, and our objective is to distill the results so you, as a voter, can see which lawmakers are representing your interests – and which are not. The legislature made some notable progress on environmental priorities Vermont Conservation Voters this session. Positive steps included new protections for our shorelands, (VCV) is the non-partisan reducing children’s exposure to toxic chemicals, and helping more political action arm of Vermont’s Vermonters to go solar. However, significant work remains to be done on key priorities – including the need to take bolder action on climate change and environmental community. cleaning up Lake Champlain. Since 1982, our mission has been to defend and strengthen the laws that The votes included in this Scorecard represent a range of priorities of the environmental community, and were selected after consulting with partner safeguard our environment. We work organizations, including the Vermont Natural Resources Council, Vermont to elect environmentally responsible Public Interest Research Group, Conservation Law Foundation, Vermont candidates. We then hold legislators Chapter of the Sierra Club, and others. The particular votes included were accountable for the decisions based on whether the vote was substantive or procedural, and which vote had the greatest effect on the outcome of the legislation. they make affecting our air, water, communities, land, and wildlife. The scorecard does have limitations. For example, we can only score “roll call” votes where individual lawmakers vote yes or no on a given bill. -
06.17 Open Letter Vertical
JUNE 2020 We Won’t Go Back: An Open Letter from State and Local Legislators Urging the U.S. Supreme Court to Defend Abortion Access We all deserve the right to make decisions about our families and our bodies, free from coercion or violence. As elected officials in states and localities, we are committed to protecting and advancing these rights. In the past decade, hundreds of restrictions on abortion care have been passed at the state level, and more local governments are restricting abortion in their own towns and counties. The resulting patchwork of laws means that a person’s ability to access your their right to abortion depends on your zip code and the contents of your bank account, with low-income people, people of color, young people, immigrant communities, and rural communities paying the steepest price. As public servants, it’s our job to not only support policies that allow our constituents to survive but policies that allow them thrive. The United States Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in June Medical Services v. Russo, which concerns medically unnecessary regulations on abortion providers, is an opportunity for the Court to uphold precedent and ensure Louisiana does not devastate peoples’ ability to get safe, legal abortion care in their communities. Anything less—allowing the Fifth Circuit and Louisiana to disregard the Court’s precedent —would open the door for states to regulate abortion out of existence for millions of families. Abortion isn’t a right if you can’t access it. The avalanche of recent state abortion restrictions, passed despite the highest levels of public support for abortion rights in decades, distorts our democracy. -
Meet Dean Corren Anti-Union 'Think Tank' Wrong About Vermont
Meet Dean Corren Dean Corren talks to board of directors recently. When your board of directors voted single payer health care.” ourselves,” he said in a recent interview to recommend Dean Corren for at Vermont-NEA headquarters. “If Corren, a Progressive who also has the lieutenant governor, the decision we are going to have a functioning backing of Democrats, wants to be a was easy. democracy, we need to restore the lieutenant governor who “will work to meaning of politics.” “He really gets it,” President Martha restore the meaning of politics.” By that, Allen said. “Dean is an unabashed he wants to transform “politics” from This is not Corren’s first stab at elected union supporter. He is a believer in angry, partisan wrangling to a platform office. He served four terms in the the importance of public education. where people of differing views House from 1993-2000; he also was And he, alone among all of the exchange ideas, debate, and agree on an aide to then-Congressman Bernie statewide candidates out there, is a course of action that serves only one Sanders. For more than a decade, dedicated to ensuring our members purpose: to better the lives of everyone. he’s been the chief technology officer are treated fairly in the transition to “Politics, at its core, is how we govern continued on p. 7 Vol. 81 No. 2 • Oct., 2013 www.vtnea.orgThe Official Publication of the Vermont-National EducationAssociation Anti-Union ‘Think Tank’ Wrong About Vermont Vermont-NEA Vermont-NEA Editor’s Note: Vermont-NEA President course let alone reality. -
An Open Letter from the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council on 2018 State Abortion Bans April 3, 2018
An Open Letter from the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council on 2018 State Abortion Bans April 3, 2018 So far in 2018, at least 39 bills to ban abortion at different points in pregnancy, or even altogether, have been introduced in at least 19 states1. These bills – several of which are advancing – are intended to be a direct challenge to a woman’s right to decide when or if to end a pregnancy as established in the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. As state legislators, we’re calling on our fellow legislators, governors, and the courts to stop these abortion bans, protect women’s health, and respect their personal decision-making. As state legislators and members of the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council, we envision a nation in which each of us can make our own decisions about our reproductive health, pregnancy, and parenting, free from political interference. We view this as intrinsically woven into the broader fabric of gender and racial equity and economic justice. Today, our country falls far short of that vision. In 2018, too many of our colleagues continue to use the privilege of public service to pass new laws limiting their own constituents’ reproductive health and rights. Outrageously, more than 400 abortion restrictions have been enacted at the state level since 2011, often making it harder for a person to get the healthcare procedure she has decided she needs, or even pushing it out of reach altogether. Today, opponents of women’s health are emboldened by extremists in power in Washington and the potential for a new U.S. -
S.122: Letter from Rep. Briglin and Others
115 STATE STREET PHONE: (802) 828-2228 MONTPELIER, VT 05633-5201 FAX: (802) 828-2424 STATE OF VERMONT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 12, 2017 House Committee on Education Vermont State House, Room 32 115 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633-5301 Via email to: Marjorie Zunder, [email protected] RE: suggested additions to S.122 Dear Chairman Sharpe and Committee Members: Thank you for continuing to take testimony and consider revisions to S.122. While the House Education Committee has decided to set aside H.15, we believe that specific components of that bill will enhance compliance with Act 46 for many communities around the state, including some of the towns that we represent. There are three specific components embedded in H.15 that we request the House Education Committee include in your revisions to S.122: • Sec. 8(c) of H.15 which states: "The State Board may adopt rules designed to implement this act [Act 461 but shall not by rule or otherwise impose additional requirements to those envisioned by this act." This section addresses the rulemaking that the State Board of Education began to pursue in 2016 that would have raised the bar on the requirements for approval of an Alternative Structure. • Sec. 1(c)(6) of H.15 which states: "The combined average daily membership, as defined in 16 V.S.A. § 4001(1), of all member districts is not less than 500." This section would allow groups of small districts that otherwise would not be able to meet the numerical requirements of Act 46 to combine using an Alternative Structure. -
2015 Will Budget Letter to Congress
March 2015 Dear Member of Congress: As you consider budgeting and appropriations decisions this year, we remind you that these decisions will profoundly impact our states and our ability as state legislators to balance budgets, meet the needs of our residents, and invest for the future. We are writing to urge you to rein in Pentagon spending with a responsible and strategic approach needed for st the 21 century. The safety of our constituents is of utmost importance, and we strongly support our brave men and women in the military and their families. In order to sustainably strengthen our nation’s security for today and for next generations, scrutiny and fiscal discipline must be applied at the Pentagon. In the President’s budget request for Fiscal Year 2016, Pentagon spending, including nuclear weapons and war spending,* would consume 53% of the nation’s discretionary budget surpassing agreed-to budget caps by $38 billion. Indeed, year after year we see Pentagon spending taking over half of the discretionary budget, and this spending has nearly doubled over the last decade. Meanwhile, we have seen cuts to the wide range of other discretionary budget programs and needed investments – including education, infrastructure, health care and much more. Cuts to these discretionary programs sharply impact our states which receive roughly one third of this funding. As state legislators we have had to make hard decisions to cut back on needed investments and services. Further cuts will add strain to state budgets and thwart economic growth. Within the supersized Pentagon spending budget, many dollars are expended on programs that are unnecessary, unwanted or unworkable and beset with cost overruns. -
June 1, 2018 Open Letter from the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council Regarding President Trump's Decision to Limit Title
June 1, 2018 Open Letter from the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council Regarding President Trump’s Decision to Limit Title X Family Planning Funding As members of the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council (RFLC), a cohort of 274 state legislators representing 43 states, we oppose the latest effort from the Trump administration to roll back reproductive rights and harm women’s health. President Trump’s proposed rule to block access to health care under Title X, our nation’s birth control and reproductive health program, and deny women information about their full reproductive health care options is unacceptable, and we stand united in opposition to this decision. President Trump’s gag rule would block health care providers from receiving federal Title X funding if they provide abortion care or offer referrals to other providers of abortion services. We’ve borne witness to the harmful impacts of the over 400 restrictions on abortion that have passed in states since 2011, and know that creating additional barriers for patients seeking access to birth control and other services from their trusted reproductive health care providers does us all a grave disservice. We see this gag rule for what it is: a clear attempt to take away our rights, make both abortion care and birth control harder to access, and drive yet another wedge between health care providers and their patients – all to pay back a political promise President Trump made to the anti-abortion lobby. We believe it is our duty as elected officials to make it easier, not harder, for people to get the health care they need, including birth control, cancer screenings, STD testing and treatment, and general women’s health exams. -
Weekly Legislative Report No. 2 January 6, 2017 Page 1
Governor Scott Takes Office ........................................ 1 Vermont House Committee Members ....................... 4 Governor Shumlin Says Good-bye .............................. 2 Summary of New Bills ................................................... 6 House Committees Makeover ....................................... 2 Advocacy Webinars ........................................................ 6 Governor Scott Takes Office Inauguration Day in Vermont is always an occasion to celebrate and showcase our state’s history and the pomp and circumstance that recall it. From the procession of four former governors and numerous dignitaries who were escorted by members of the armed services in Vermont to the singing of “America the Beautiful” by Colchester Police Chief Jennifer Morrison, it was an opportunity for the overflow crowd of Vermonters crammed in the House Chamber to witness their state’s peaceful transfer of power. After Governor Philip Scott took the oath of office, he used his inauguration speech to focus on themes that he had emphasized throughout his campaign for office. He assured Vermonters that he heard their concerns about “struggles to make ends meet as costs and taxes rise and good paying jobs are fewer and fewer.” He committed his administration to strengthening the economy, making living and doing business in Vermont more affordable, and protecting the most vulnerable. He announced that he would sign an executive order that very day directing every state agency to focus on those issues. His purpose in so doing, -
Comment (5) of Valerie Stuart on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Venriont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommiss
Page 1 of 2 RULES ha- [•' ,'-. .IVES •:i! (:: ri As of: 3/16/15 3:43 PM Received: February 27, 2015 PUBLIC., SUBMO6 1: 6 Status: PendingPost PUB ICUB ISS ONI P L Tracking No. ljz-8hfr-5b8j 5 Comments Due: March 23, 2015 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2015-0004 RFC I\/YD Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Comment On: NRC-2015-0004-0001 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Venriont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Document: NRC-2015-0004-DRAFT-0007 Comment on FR Doc # 2015-00450 Submitter Information Name: Valerie Stuart ,//b[/C,2I i\. Address: 6F 520 Meadowbrook Road F' - / / Brattleboro, VT, 05301 Email: [email protected] General Comment February 27, 2015 Dear Sirs, We write in response to your Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR). In our role as Vermont State Senators and Representatives of many Windham County towns, we want the following points to be part of the public record. We do not support SAFSTOR. Costs will only go up and contamination will spread by waiting up to 60 years as is currently allowed by the NRC. Our community is a special case that will not benefit from a cookie cutter approach. We are only the second merchant reactor to decommission. Moreover, Entergy is located on the second smallest land area of any US nuclear plant. It also is located in the middle of a town and has an elementary school located across from the gate to the plant. All of these factors contribute to making Entergy an unsuitable site for SAFSTOR. -
Town Mtg Rpt 2021-03-01
February 23, 2021 This document was prepared by members of the Vermont House Democratic caucus to help the public understand the work in our committees during the first half of the 2021 legislative session. The page numbers link to the appropriate page. (posted by Rep. Scott Campbell, St. Johnsbury) Table of Contents Agriculture & Forestry – John O’Brien 2 Appropriations – Maida Townsend 3 Commerce & Economic Development – Michael Nigro 4 Education – Jana Brown & Kathleen James 6 Energy & Technology – Katherine Sims 7 Government Operations – Peter Anthony & Mike Mrowicki 9 Health Care – Leslie Goldman 10 Human Services – Dane Whitman 11 Judiciary – Will Notte 12 Natural Resources, Fish & Wildlife – Larry Satcowitz & Kari Dolan 13 Transportation – Becca White, Gabrielle Stebbins & Diane Lanpher 13 Ways & Means – Carol Ode 15 1 Agriculture & Forestry – John O’Brien Working Lands & Farm to School While new bills, like babies, o/en a0ract much oo-ing and ah-ing, it’s good policy for commi0ees to check in with the “legacies” of past legisla?on. Early in the session, the House Commi0ee on Agriculture and Forestry heard “what have you been up to?” tes?mony on two programs it helped create and cul?vate: the Working Lands Enterprise Ini?a?ve (WLEI) and the Farm to School program (F2S). Working Lands (which provides grants and consul?ng for rural economic development projects) is such a success that the Governor has proposed adding $3 million in a one-?me appropria?on to next year’s WLEI budget. F2S, which advocates for, and coordinates, geng local food into our schools, is an on-going win-win-win (farmers benefit economically, healthy students are more focused, schools achieve be0er results); the only restric?on on expanding its success is financial, as there are never enough dollars for deserving programs.