Biomethanation: a Unique and Sustainable Approach To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biomethanation: a Unique and Sustainable Approach To Power-to-Gas Biomethanation: A Unique and Sustainable Approach to Renewable Natural Gas and other products Kevin Harrison & Nancy Dowe National Renewable Energy Laboratory AGA/EPA 2019 Renewable Natural Gas Workshop Peppermill Reno – Reno, NV September 24, 2019 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Me,an LCOE $/MWh $3,60 359 330 Advanced e,ner,gy techn 1ologaes are :providi'ng re,al-wo1 rld s,olutions by: 300 • Becoming increasingly cost-competitive 270 ., Boosting the US. energy ·ndustry 240 • Providing jobs ~or American workers 2 10 180 150 S135 1.20 23 $11 102 Coal (8%) 90 83 60 O , ...... _. o 1n d C cl { 27) 50 Utill Scale olar (86 ) 30 .___ _____________________________________ _ $ 5 Wind (67 o) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015, 2'016 20 7 Rt I 6 Source: lmard's lOl 7 L v llzed Co r ofEn rgy Analysis, V r ion L 2 No m 20 7 https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-2017/ New U.S. Electricity Generating Capacity Additions, 2010-2018 Recent U.S. Electricity 100% 90% ....... Wind .,:,:g ''New ,Capacity'' 80% -00 c:: 0 E ,:, 70% 'Cl <( >, 60% -~ 32% ro C. 50% NG uro ~ 40% ;a: 0 30% ~ .cro Far from {{alternative,,, (J) 20% ren,ewable en,ergy and 10% Solar 0% natural gas is the new 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 normal in the United States ■ Solar ■ Natural Gas ■ Coal ■ Wind Othar Source. Wood Macken~e Power & Renewables FERC (All o her tec:hnolog1osl The Need for Long-Duration Energy Storage Figure 4. Total Renewable Generation Serving California Load by Resource Type 100 000 Estlm te BTM Solar 90,000 14% BTM Solar Solar 13, 18 80,000 Wind Geothermal ■ Solar 70,000 31% Small Hydro 30,262 60,000 Biomass J: ~ '!let.id t.:) 50,000 M Wind 40,000 29% 27,838 30,000 20,000 1 Geothermal 3,249 10,000 4% Small Hyd o % 4,347 0 I Biomass I I 1983 I 8,04 2002 2006 20 1 2015 2018 Ff5l Ca lfCf ,a RPS e bliYled RPSmcreased to ZO%by 2010 RPS aeased RPS increased RPS1ooe.1~ (?OO(i by 20m CSI Initiated Global warm11g to 33%by 2020 lo 50% by 2030 to 60% b'{ 2030 Sokltlons Acl of n Source: Ca lifo rnia Energy Commission, staff analysis November 2018 H2@Scale Initiative Conventional Storage Hydrogen Benefits of ~Vehicle Renewable H2 ~ • Enables higher Upgrading penetration of Oil / renewable electricity Biomass • Electrolyzer can provide grid services Ammonia/ • H2 provides Fertilizer flexibility • O2 is a byproduct, too Growing Electric Grid • Infra structure • transportation sector Reduces• fossil fuel 2.5M miles End Use consumption Scale- able, non-toxic, low temperature process 10 MM tons H2 /year in U.S. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/h2scale Storing Renewable Electricity as Molecules ] ______________________________________________ ---------- l!i!lir 100 □ I ·---------------------------------------------~- 1 Ma11th 100 ..., Over 130 billion cubic ~-------------------------- 1Day feet of natural gas _____________ _,_ storage capacity exists in 1 .,- --- Southern California. E-101.:ir o.:m. To put this in O.ol perspective, this is enough to supply all of 0.001 --+- the gas-fired generation 1 kWll 10 klMI 100 kWh Ml.Wh 10 MWh 100 MWil 1 <rWh 10 GWl!J 100 r.ffl ~ 1 T\1'1,111 lOTWh 1 TW'h in the region for more than two months. Electricity, transportation, feedstock and heat - SoCalGas • NG has high energy density ~7x greater than H2 • Existing national energy transmission system • Flexibility in energy use • Shifting RE with seasonal energy storage • High scalability of P2G and RNG Production Wind and Solar Curtailment Totals Wind and solar curtailment totals by month 800,000 250,000 700,000 225,000 714,445 California ISO Thru 200,000 600,000 August ~ 175,000 .c 500,000 ~ e., 150,000 ... 461,054 ::, 400,000 _g 125,000 401,493 1ro 100,000 300,000 O'l 308,421 Q) Curtailed MWh ~ 75,000 200,000 187,722 100,000 :::: 111 1 I II .. 111 11 I I I I I I I I - Jan '17 Jul '17 Jan '18 I Jul '18 Jan '19 Jul '19 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 http://www.caiso.com/informed/Pages/ManagingOversupply.aspx Year MWh MT kg H2 MT CO2 Solar and wind curtailed by year 2015 187,722 3,754 19,992 Production only assume: 50 kWh/kg H 2 2016 308,421 6,168 32,846 Thru August of 2019 alone, over 2017 401,493 8,030 42,757 76,000 Metric Tons of CO2 could have been recycled! 2018 461,054 9,221 49,100 2019 714,445 14,289 76,085 Waste-to-Energy: Biogas Sources of CO2 End Uses: Heat, fuel, chemical feedstock Re-electrification via fuel cells Solar Energy Meets SoCalGas’ or gas-fired power plants Rule 30 gas Wind Energy quality standard NG Storage Other Low-Carbon (...__]Network HHV R30: 970-1150 CO R30: 3% max e - Heat 2 H R30: 0.1% Biogas Sources O Renewable 2 2 Trigger* Wastewater Electrolysis CH 4 *SoCalGas doe not Fermentation have a shut-off Landfill H Water limit, but this level Energy Crops 2 BIOMETHANATION triggers additional Manure REACTOR study/testing. Biogas Supply CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 + 2H2O CO2 (~40%) CH (~60%) 4 Nutrient Supply Renewable Hydrogen Production Step 1: Using renewable electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen in an electrolyzer ½” dia. H2 tube at 400 psig Rules of Thumb • MW-scale: 50 – 55 kWh make 1 kg of H2 1 MW electrolyzer, ~400 kg /day - • e 2H2O + e 2H2 + O2 + Heat • 1 kg H2 ~1 gallon of gasoline (gge) Electrolyzer – Electricity Grid Support _44 - PJM RegD Command ! 42 - Electrolyzer AC Power -~ 40 38 Q.~ u 36 <C :U 34 N Electrolyzer systems are f... 32 1 Sample flexible electrical loads that per second can help stabilize the tcu 30 -LLI 0 10 20 30 40 electrical grid and enable Time (min) higher penetrations of renewable electricity. Supporting grid stability • Typical utility profile to validate performance • System response, not just stack • 120 kW PEM stack operating on NREL’s electrolyzer stack test bed • Flexible demand side management tool could be used to provide frequency response service Source: Harrison K., Mann M., Terlip D., and Peters M., NREL/FS-5600-54658 Biomethanation – RNG Production from CO2 Step 2: Using the renewable H2 (from Step 1) and CO2 in a downstream biomethanation process to produce renewable methane and water Biocatalyst 4H2 + CO2 CH4 + 2H2O + Heat Benefits of Biomethanation • Recycles CO2 …. As well as the CH4 o Ethanol, dairies, wastewater, breweries, fossil • Meets (SoCalGas’) pipeline quality standards o 998 BTU/CF, 0.89% CO2, 0.4% H2 • Scale-able, non-toxic, self-replicating biocatalyst, • Low temperature (65°C) systems Rule of Thumb: 10MWe of electrolysis feeding a bioreactor can produce ~500 scfm (12,000 Nm3 or 440 MMBTU per day/6 g/L-hr) of methane and recycles ~20 tons of CO2 per day H2 & RNG Systems at NREL Electrolyzer System H2 and RNG R&D Site Today, 250 kW PEM stack #1) 350 and 700 bar pre-cooled H2 dispensing system 5 kg H2 / hr #2) Diaphragm and piston compressors 30 bar H2 Pressure #3) 700 L bioreactor – operates at 18 bar (260 psig) Up to 70 bar max and 60 - 65oC with agitation, recirculation loop and (4) Power Supplies cell recycle Current-sharing mode #4) 200, 400 & 900 bar storage - 350 kg Total 4000 Adc at 250 Vdc #3 #1 #2 #4 Varying Input Gas Flows 7 Step-up and step-down response 6 5 shown J 4 i Bioreactor can load follow like an Carbon Dioxide 3 electrolyzer 2 Gas Flow Rate (kg/hr)Gas Flow Rate Hydrogen 1 Challenge: Low density gas, like H2, 0 is difficult to monitor 2:52:48 PM 3:07:12 PM 3:21:36 PM 3:36:00 PM 3:50:24 PM Time 7 Goal: Maintain > 98% methane 6 production under varying input 5 A1•--~ gas flows 4 Carbon Dioxide 3 ~ .__. fttJ.8'1 ••• , f 7 2 Trace CO2, H2 and H2S remaining 2 1 Cd f Hydrogen Maintain H:C Ratio L ■ C a•n- Gas Flow Rate (kg/hr) GasFlowRate 0 3:47:31 PM 3:54:43 PM 4:01:55 PM 4:09:07 PM 4:16:19 PM 4:23:31 PM 4:30:43 PM Ideally 4:1 H2 to CO2 / Time \ SoCalGas – 700L Bioreactor Start-up After 24 hours of total 100 operation conversion reached 92% 90 Increased Agitation During this start- 80 up phase the Started new biocatalyst grew 70 to 10x the initial Day at lower population agitation 60 Increased Agitation reached Agitation 50% of maximum 50 RPM Flow rates 20% of 40 rated Percentage (%) Percentage Low Agitation Methane 0.6 kg/hr H2 Reactor pressure 4 30 bar during this 3.0 kg/hr CO2 CO2 time 20 18 bar (260 psig) max. 10 Day 1 Day 2 Day 4 0 Day 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 Hours of Operation Increasing Pressure to Improve Conversion Conversion reached -0-% Conversion 100 -0-Methane 98% 90 CO2 Conversion = % CH4 80 % CH4 + %CO2 70 Increased Increased Pressure to 7 Bar Increased 60 Pressure to 6 Bar Agitation Operational State 50 ,_____,A~-...... 50% r , Start pressure 5 bar 40 Returned to low Percentage (%) (%) Percentage 30 agitation rate 20 0.6 kg/hr H2 10 3.0 kg/hr CO2 0 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 Hours of Operation Biocatalyst – Methanogenic Archaea Growth Requirements Long Term Stability • Capable of daily startup • Seawater environment • “Load” following • Salts and minerals • Robust • 60 ‒ 65oC Electrochaea’s proprietary • Self-replicating • Anaerobic conditions biocatalyst is a selectively • Fast recovery during • Feedgas: CO and H evolved – not genetically 2 2 start/stop cycles modified – strain of methanogenic archaea, a Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus single-celled microorganism that has populated Earth for Efficient 98.6% of carbon goes into methane billions of years Productive VVD* of 800, H2 mass-transfer limited http://www.electrochaea.com/ Quick return to methane production within technology/ Responsive seconds/minutes Selective 100% methane, no intermediates Tolerant to oxygen, H S, CO, Sulfate, Ammonia, Robust 2 particulates Simple Moderate temperature range (60 ‒ 65°C) ectrochaea Challenge – Reducing the Cost of H2 4.5 r;:== 4.20 R&D Advances ■ Other Costs u4· _0•, .::.:: - ·........- ,41').
Recommended publications
  • Methanation of CO2 - Storage of Renewable Energy in a Gas Distribution System Tanja Schaaf*, Jochen Grünig, Markus Roman Schuster, Tobias Rothenfluh and Andreas Orth
    Schaaf et al. Energy, Sustainability and Society ( DOI 10.1186/s13705-014-0029-1 REVIEW Open Access Methanation of CO2 - storage of renewable energy in a gas distribution system Tanja Schaaf*, Jochen Grünig, Markus Roman Schuster, Tobias Rothenfluh and Andreas Orth Abstract This article presents some crucial findings of the joint research project entitled «Storage of electric energy from renewable sources in the natural gas grid-water electrolysis and synthesis of gas components». The project was funded by BMBF and aimed at developing viable concepts for the storage of excess electrical energy from wind and solar power plants. The concept presented in this article suggests the conversion of CO2-containing gases into methane in a pressurized reactor using hydrogen produced via electrolysis. The produced gas can be upgraded to synthetic natural gas (SNG) and fed into the well-developed German natural gas grid. This concept benefits from the high storage capacity of the German gas grid and does not require any extensions of the current gas or power grid. The reaction heat released by the exothermic methanation reaction leads to a temperature rise of the gas in the fixed bed catalyst of the reactor. The conversion of carbon dioxide is limited in accordance to the chemical equilibrium which depends strongly on temperature and pressure. For maximum carbon dioxide conversion, it is convenient to split the methanation into several stages adding cooling sections in between. This article focuses on the methanation process and its transfer onto an industrial scale evaluating the different plant capacities and feedstock mixtures used. The methanation takes place in a staged fixed bed reactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogas Upgrading / CO Reduction Using Renewable Hydrogen And
    Biogas Upgrading / CO2 Reduction Using Renewable Hydrogen and Biocatalysts U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Energy Circular Carbon Economy Summit Denver, CO July 24-25, 2018 1 SoCalGas Largest U.S. natural gas distribution utility 140 years young Population 21 million 8,000 employees 1 Tcf/year 2 SoCalGas Transmission System Our Focus: Customer Needs and Emerging Trends Industry Themes Implications Solutions • Rising utility bills • Appliance energy efficiency • Develop technologies to meet air quality standards Affordability • Large percentage of customers on assistance • Utilize existing infrastructure and domestic supplies • Need to continue to provide affordable energy of natural gas • Acute public heath problem • Appliance emission standards • Renewable natural gas for transportation • Transportation is 80% of NOx Air Quality / NOx • Low Nox engines • Potential to replace diesel with clean fuels • Fuel cells • Demand for renewable gas • Renewable gas from biomass and excess wind & Greenhouse Gas • Wind and solar overgeneration (duck curve) solar power (power-to-gas) Emissions • Depressed power prices • Hydrogen for fuel and pipeline blending • Growing need for energy storage solutions • Electric and gas grid integration • Carbon up-cycling • Pipeline Monitoring Reliability and • Leak detection • Enhance pipeline safety Safety • Monitor and reduce methane emissions • Distributed energy applications • Robust power reliability 4 RD&D Objectives (PUC Code 740.1) 1. Environmental improvement 2. Public and employee safety 3. Conservation by efficient resource use or by reducing or shifting system load 4. Development of new resources and processes, particularly renewable resources and processes which further supply technologies 5. Improve operating efficiency and reliability or otherwise reduce operating costs 5 Research, Development and Demonstration (RD&D) End-Use Appliances Clean Transportation Emerging Technologies Low-carbon Resources .
    [Show full text]
  • Power-To-Gas: Linking Electricity and Gas in a Decarbonising World?
    October 2018 Power-to-Gas: Linking Electricity and Gas in a Decarbonising World? Introduction Decarbonisation of energy systems has become a mainstream topic for the global energy industry as countries attempt to achieve the goals to reduce the impact of global climate change as set out at the COP21 meeting in Paris in December 2015. The initial focus of decarbonisation has been in the power generation sector, where, after initial subsidies, the cost of wind and solar generation has now fallen to such a level that, in many cases, it is expected to be able to compete with fossil fuel alternatives without any government support1. For several years, incumbent players in the gas industry have advocated that, since natural gas has the lowest carbon dioxide emissions among fossil fuels, the ‘obvious’ way to reduce carbon emissions was to switch from other fossil fuels to natural gas. In particular, in the power generation sector, switching from coal to gas was seen, with some justification, to yield significant CO2 savings. More recently, there has been a realisation that with the long term objective that the energy system should be approaching carbon-neutrality by 2050, continuing to burn significant quantities of fossil-derived natural gas will not be sustainable. Against that background, the OIES Natural Gas Programme has been increasing its focus on the ‘Future of Gas’2. Overall, OIES concludes that in Europe natural gas demand will be relatively flat until around 2030, but will need to decline at an accelerating rate thereafter if carbon reduction targets are to be met. If existing natural gas infrastructure is to avoid becoming stranded assets, plans to decarbonise the gas system need to be developed as a matter of urgency in the next three to five years, given the typical life expectancy of such assets of 20 years or more.
    [Show full text]
  • European Power-To-Gas Roadmap
    October 2020 Remarks to the reader of the STORE&GO Roadmap for large-scale storage based PtG conversion in the EU up to 2050 The STORE&GO project started in 2016 and has been running up to February 2020. The content and conclusions in the Roadmap therefore reflect the results generated during this period. Since there have meanwhile been some fundamental developments at the EU political level, e.g. with the publication of “The European Green Deal” [1], EU strategies for energy system integration and hydrogen documents [2] [3] and the 2030 Climate Target Plan [4], the authors feel the need to give the reader some reflections on how they feel these new developments relate to the content of the STORE&GO document, and could have altered the conclusions. With regard to the text of the STORE&GO Roadmap the more recent developments seem to generally underline the STORE&GO key point of the need for an urgent and progressive approach to “greening the molecules” and gas in particular. Some of the actions suggested in the European Green Deal are already addressing this, and one can therefore argue that they are in line with the roadmap recommendations. In the European Green Deal 2030 Climate Target Plan a more ambitious mid-term mitigation target is mentioned,55% rather than the prior target of 40% [4]. In our view this new target would not have altered the conclusions made in the Roadmap. It rather emphasises the need for a strategic and coordinated approach to guarantee a well-functioning energy market, efficient technologies, and sufficient supply of renewable gases in time as described in the roadmap ‘The energy picture of the EU by 2050’.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstration of a Biogas Methanation Combined With
    1231 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGTRANSACTIONS VOL. 52, 2016 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.aidic.it/cet Guest Editors: Petar Sabev Varbanov, Peng-Yen Liew, Jun-Yow Yong, Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, Hon Loong Lam Copyright © 2016, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN978-88-95608-42-6; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1652206 Demonstration of a Biogas Methanation Combined with Membrane Based Gas Upgrading in a Promising Power-to-Gas Concept a a b c Florian Kirchbacher* , Martin Miltner , Markus Lehner , Horst Steinmüller , Michael Haraseka aInstitute of Chemical Engineering, TU Wien, A-1060 Vienna, Getreidemarkt 9/166, Austria b Chair for Process Technology and Industrial Environmental Protection, Montanuniversität Leoben, A-8700 Leoben, Franz- Josef-Straße 18, Austria CEnergieinstitut at Johannes Kepler University Linz, A-4040 Linz, Altenbergerstraße 69, Austria [email protected] The further development of photovoltaic and wind power as renewable energies with their production rate fluctuations both on short- and medium-time-scale result in the necessity of smarter grids and higher energy storage capacities. One very prominent and promising technology for meeting this future electric energy storage demand is the concept of power-to-gas. Here, the excess electric energy is converted to hydrogen using alkaline or PEM electrolysis. Most concepts incorporate an immediate subsequent conversion to methane using a local carbon dioxide source and a process of thermo-catalytic or biological methanation. After a final gas upgrading mainly comprising the separation of H2, CO2 and H2O the produced SNG can be fed to the natural gas grid owning a huge potential for energy storage and distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Supported Catalysts for CO2 Methanation: a Review
    catalysts Review Supported Catalysts for CO2 Methanation: A Review Patrizia Frontera 1,2, Anastasia Macario 3,*, Marco Ferraro 4 and PierLuigi Antonucci 1 1 Civil Engineering, Energy, Environmental and Materials Department, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, 89134 Reggio Calabria, Italy; [email protected] (P.F.); [email protected] (P.A.) 2 Consorzio Interuniversitario per la Scienza e la Tecnologia dei Materiali—INSTM, 50121 Firenze, Italy 3 Environmental&Chemical Engineering Department, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy 4 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche—Istituto di Tecnologie Avanzate per l’Energia “Nicola Giordano”, IT-98126 Messina, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0984-496-704 Academic Editors: Benoît Louis, Qiang Wang and Marcelo Maciel Pereira Received: 16 December 2016; Accepted: 8 February 2017; Published: 13 February 2017 Abstract: CO2 methanation is a well-known reaction that is of interest as a capture and storage (CCS) process and as a renewable energy storage system based on a power-to-gas conversion process by substitute or synthetic natural gas (SNG) production. Integrating water electrolysis and CO2 methanation is a highly effective way to store energy produced by renewables sources. The conversion of electricity into methane takes place via two steps: hydrogen is produced by electrolysis and converted to methane by CO2 methanation. The effectiveness and efficiency of power-to-gas plants strongly depend on the CO2 methanation process. For this reason, research on CO2 methanation has intensified over the last 10 years. The rise of active, selective, and stable catalysts is the core of the CO2 methanation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Methanation Demonstration Plant in Allendorf Germany
    BIOGAS IN SOCIETY BIOLOGICAL METHANATION A Case Story DEMONSTRATION PLANT IN ALLENDORF, GERMANY AN UPGRADING FACILITY FOR BIOGAS IEA Bioenergy Task 37 IEA Bioenergy: Task 37: October 2018 BIOGAS IN SOCIETY – Biological methanation demonstration plant in Allendorf Germany MISSION AND VISION PLANT DESCRIPTION The power-to-gas concept is an energy storage solution suitable The first demonstration plant worldwide using the power to gas for long-term and large-scale storage of intermittent renewable combination of electrolysis and biological methanation was electricity. Initially renewable electricity is used to produce established in Germany at the Schwandorf wastewater treatment hydrogen via electrolysis. Further conversion to renewable plant. This was a collaboration project between MicrobEnergy methane is conducted by reacting hydrogen with a carbon source GmbH, Schmack Carbotech GmbH (Essen, Germany), Viessmann (4H2 + CO2 = CH4 +2H2O). The plant concept is based on a biological Werke GmbH & Co. KG and Schmack Biogas GmbH (Schwandorf, methanation process using the carbon dioxide in raw biogas as Germany). The facility moved to Allendorf (Eder, Germany) in late the carbon source. Thus, the technology doubles as a biogas 2014 (Figure 2). The plant consists of a PEM-electrolyzer upgrading process ideally suited for small biogas plants and as an (Carbotech) and a methanation unit (BiON technology, energy storage for otherwise curtailed renewable electricity. The MicrobEnergy GmbH). The methanation unit forms the core of generated methane gas serves as an advanced gaseous transport the plant and converts either carbon dioxide from the gas fuel or may be used for renewable heat (Figure 1). processing plant or directly from the raw biogas (Figure 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Sources of Natural Gas: Supply and Emissions Reduction Assessment
    December 2019 RENEWABLE SOURCES OF NATURAL GAS: SUPPLY AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION ASSESSMENT An American Gas Foundation Study Prepared by: Legal Notice This report was prepared for the American Gas Foundation, with the assistance of its contractors, to be a source of independent analysis. Neither the American Gas Foundation, its contractors, nor any person acting on their behalf: § Makes any warranty or representation, express or implied with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately-owned rights, § Assumes any liability, with respect to the use of, damages resulting from the use of, any information, method, or process disclosed in this report, § Recommends or endorses any of the conclusions, methods or processes analyzed herein. References to work practices, products or vendors do not imply an opinion or endorsement of the American Gas Foundation or its contractors. Use of this publication is voluntary and should be taken after an independent review of the applicable facts and circumstances. Copyright © American Gas Foundation, 2019. American Gas Foundation (AGF) Founded in 1989, the American Gas Foundation (AGF) is a 501(c)(3) organization focused on being an independent source of information research and programs on energy and environmental issues that affect public policy, with a particular emphasis on natural gas. When it comes to issues that impact public policy on energy, the AGF is committed to making sure the right questions are being asked and answered. With oversight from its board of trustees, the foundation funds independent, critical research that can be used by policy experts, government officials, the media and others to help formulate fact-based energy policies that will serve this country well in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • CO2 Methanation of Biogas Over 20 Wt% Ni-Mg-Al Catalyst: on the Effect of N2, CH4, and O2 on CO2 Conversion Rate
    catalysts Article CO2 Methanation of Biogas over 20 wt% Ni-Mg-Al Catalyst: on the Effect of N2, CH4, and O2 on CO2 Conversion Rate Danbee Han 1, Yunji Kim 1, Hyunseung Byun 1, Wonjun Cho 2 and Youngsoon Baek 1,* 1 Department of Environmental and Energy Engineering, University of Suwon, Hwaseong-si 18323, Korea; [email protected] (D.H.); [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (H.B.) 2 Unisys International R&D, Bio Friends Inc., Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34028, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-220-2167 Received: 27 August 2020; Accepted: 14 October 2020; Published: 16 October 2020 Abstract: Biogas contains more than 40% CO2 that can be removed to produce high quality CH4. Recently, CH4 production from CO2 methanation has been reported in several studies. In this study, CO2 methanation of biogas was performed over a 20 wt% Ni-Mg-Al catalyst, and the effects of CO2 conversion rate and CH4 selectivity were investigated as a function of CH4,O2,H2O, and N2 1 compositions of the biogas. At a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 30,000 h− , the CO2 conversion rate was ~79.3% with a CH4 selectivity of 95%. In addition, the effects of the reaction temperature 1 (200–450 ◦C), GHSV (21,000–50,000 h− ), and H2/CO2 molar ratio (3–5) on the CO2 conversion rate and CH4 selectivity over the 20 wt% Ni-Mg-Al catalyst were evaluated. The characteristics of the catalyst were analyzed using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area analysis, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Synthetic Fuels: Renewable Routes for the Conversion of Non-Fossil Feedstocks Into Gaseous Fuels and Their End Uses
    energies Review Green Synthetic Fuels: Renewable Routes for the Conversion of Non-Fossil Feedstocks into Gaseous Fuels and Their End Uses Elena Rozzi 1,2,*, Francesco Demetrio Minuto 1,2 , Andrea Lanzini 1,2 and Pierluigi Leone 1,2 1 Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy; [email protected] (F.D.M.); [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (P.L.) 2 Energy Center Lab, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 December 2019; Accepted: 10 January 2020; Published: 15 January 2020 Abstract: Innovative renewable routes are potentially able to sustain the transition to a decarbonized energy economy. Green synthetic fuels, including hydrogen and natural gas, are considered viable alternatives to fossil fuels. Indeed, they play a fundamental role in those sectors that are difficult to electrify (e.g., road mobility or high-heat industrial processes), are capable of mitigating problems related to flexibility and instantaneous balance of the electric grid, are suitable for large-size and long-term storage and can be transported through the gas network. This article is an overview of the overall supply chain, including production, transport, storage and end uses. Available fuel conversion technologies use renewable energy for the catalytic conversion of non-fossil feedstocks into hydrogen and syngas. We will show how relevant technologies involve thermochemical, electrochemical and photochemical processes. The syngas quality can be improved by catalytic CO and CO2 methanation reactions for the generation of synthetic natural gas. Finally, the produced gaseous fuels could follow several pathways for transport and lead to different final uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Benefits of Optimizing Hydrogen Storage and Methanation Capacities
    Applied Energy 257 (2020) 113967 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy Cost benefits of optimizing hydrogen storage and methanation capacities for Power-to-Gas plants in dynamic operation T ⁎ Jachin Gorrea, , Fabian Ruossa, Hannu Karjunenb, Johannes Schaffertc, Tero Tynjäläb a University of Applied Science Rapperswil, Oberseestrasse 10, 8640 Rapperswil, Switzerland b Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Yliopistonkatu 34, PL 20, 53851 Lappeenranta, Finland c Gas- und Wärme-Institut Essen e.V., Hafenstrasse 101, 45356 Essen, Germany HIGHLIGHTS • Optimization tool is developed for dimensioning Power-to-Gas components. • Detailed Power-to-Gas cost analyses are made for different operational environments. • 6–17% reduction in gas production costs was achieved via component dimensioning. • Sensitivity analyses show impacts of key parameters on plant operation. • Optimal configurations are highly dependent on the electricity source being used. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Power-to-Gas technologies offer a promising approach for converting renewable electricity into a molecular form Power-to-Gas (fuel) to serve the energy demands of non-electric energy applications in all end-use sectors. The technologies Hydrogen interim storage have been broadly developed and are at the edge of a mass roll-out. The barriers that Power-to-Gas faces are no Dynamic operation longer technical, but are, foremost, regulatory, and economic. This study focuses on a Power-to-Gas pathway, Optimization where electricity is first converted in a water electrolyzer into hydrogen, which is then synthetized with carbon Cost reduction dioxide to produce synthetic natural gas. A key aspect of this pathway is that an intermittent electricity supply Operation strategy could be used, which could reduce the amount of electricity curtailment from renewable energy generation.
    [Show full text]
  • WP1 Gas Conditioning and Grid Operation
    WP1 Gas conditioning and grid operation DELIVERABLE 1.1.1 Upgrading of Biogas to Biomethane with the Addition of Hydrogen from Electrolysis Prepared by: Dadi Sveinbjörnsson and Ebbe Münster, PlanEnergi Reviewed by: Nabin Aryal, DGC and Rasmus Bo Bramstoft Pedersen, DTU Date: 18.09.2017 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Motivation .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 The scope of the report .............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Gas types ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Biogas ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Hydrogen ................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 Biomethane ............................................................................................................ 5 2 Methanation of biogas ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Catalytic methanation of biogas ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]