Community, Trophic Structure and Functioning in Two Contrasting Laminaria Hyperborea Forests
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Regional Studies in Marine Science Artificial Substrates As Sampling
Regional Studies in Marine Science 37 (2020) 101331 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Regional Studies in Marine Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rsma Artificial substrates as sampling devices for marine epibenthic fauna: A quest for standardization ∗ Diego Carreira-Flores a,b,c, , Regina Neto a, Hugo Ferreira a, Edna Cabecinha c, Guillermo Díaz-Agras b, Pedro T. Gomes a a Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Portugal b Marine Biology Station of A Graña, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain c Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Department of Biology and Environment, University of Trás-os montes and Alto Douro, Portugal article info a b s t r a c t Article history: In temperate regions, macroalgae are naturally abundant habitat builders for many organisms of Received 6 March 2020 ecological and economic importance. Hence, macroalgae are good targets for monitoring studies based Received in revised form 12 May 2020 on colonization processes as, through them, it is possible to sample the epifauna that uses them as Accepted 28 May 2020 habitat. Nevertheless, macroalgae collection may not be sustainable, can compromise the survival of Available online 30 May 2020 the target macroalgae populations and destroy fragile or threatened communities. Keywords: The search for an adequate procedure that can overcome the problems related to destructive Epifaunal assemblages quantitative sampling of the epifauna associated with macroalgae and the development of a method- Macroalgae ology that can be used for comparative macrofauna monitoring, regardless of the location, were the Artificial Seaweed Monitoring Structures motivations for this study. -
Holoturias (Echinodermata: Holothlroidea) De Las Islas Canarias: Ii. Ordenes Dendrochirotida, Elasipodida Y Apodida Y Molpadida
Rev .Acad. Canar .Cienc. , IV (nums. 3 y 4), 163-185 (1992) HOLOTURIAS (ECHINODERMATA: HOLOTHLROIDEA) DE LAS ISLAS CANARIAS: II. ORDENES DENDROCHIROTIDA, ELASIPODIDA, APODIDA Y MOLPADIDA. A. Perez-Ruzafa\ C. Marcos' y J.J. Bacallado' ' Depto. de Biologfa Animal y Ecologia. Universidad de Murcia. 30100 Murcia. ' Museo Insular de Ciencias Naturales. Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Islas Canarias ABSTRACT The holothurian fauna of Canary Islands has been studied on ihe base of mid-, infra- and circaliltoral sampling, existing museum collections and bibliographic data. Its includes 34 species (17 Aspidochirolida. 4 Dendrochirotida, 10 Elasipodida, 2 Apt)dida and 1 Molpadida). This paper presents the catalogue, biological data and determination keys of the Orderes Dendrochirotida, Elasip>odida, Aptxlida and Molpadida and a general discussion about the Class Hololhuroidca in these Islands. KK.\ WORDS: Holothuroidca, Dendrochirotida, Elasipodida, Apodida, Molpadida, Canary Islands. RESUMEN La fauna de holoturias de las islas Canarias ha sido estudiada en base a muestreos realizados en el medio, infra y circaliloral, datos existentes en las colccciones de diferentes museos y referencias bibliograficas. Incluye 34 especies (17 Aspidtxhirotida, 4 Dendrochirotida, lU Elasiptxlida, 2 Apodida y 1 Molpadida). En este Irabajo se prcscnta cl calalogo, datos biologicos y las claves dc detcrminacion dc los Ordcncs Dendrochirotida, Elasipodida. Apodida y Molpadida, asi como una discusion general acerca de la Clase Hololhuroidca en las islas. PALABRAS CLA\T: Hololhuroidca, DcndrvKhirolida, Elasipi^dida, Apodida. Molpadida, Islas Canarias. 1. INTRODLCCION A pesar de la amplia distribucion de esta Clase, de su interes desde el punio de vista comercial (en aspectos como la alimentacion o la investigacion farmacologica) y del importante papel ecologico que juega sobre todo en las comunidades bentonicas, existe una gran escasez de trabajos que se hace mas paiente en determinados grupos sistematicos perienecientes a la misma. -
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/11/2021 08:33:28AM Via Free Access 224 E
Contributions to Zoology, 67 (4) 223-235 (1998) SPB Academic Publishing bv, Amsterdam Optics and phylogeny: is there an insight? The evolution of superposition eyes in the Decapoda (Crustacea) Edward Gaten Department of Biology, University’ ofLeicester, Leicester LEI 7RH, U.K. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Compound eyes, superposition optics, adaptation, evolution, decapod crustaceans, phylogeny Abstract cannot normally be predicted by external exami- nation alone, and usually microscopic investiga- This addresses the of structure and in paper use eye optics the tion of properly fixed optical elements is required construction of and crustacean phylogenies presents an hypoth- for a complete diagnosis. This largely rules out esis for the evolution of in the superposition eyes Decapoda, the use of fossil material in the based the of in comparatively on distribution eye types extant decapod fami- few lies. It that arthropodan specimens where the are is suggested reflecting superposition optics are eyes symplesiomorphic for the Decapoda, having evolved only preserved (Glaessner, 1969), although the optics once, probably in the Devonian. loss of Subsequent reflecting of some species of trilobite have been described has superposition optics occurred following the adoption of a (Clarkson & Levi-Setti, 1975). Also the require- new habitat (e.g. Aristeidae,Aeglidae) or by progenetic paedo- ment for good fixation and the fact that complete morphosis (Paguroidea, Eubrachyura). examination invariably involves the destruction of the specimen means that museum collections Introduction rarely reveal enough information to define the optics unequivocally. Where the optics of the The is one of the compound eye most complex component parts of the eye are under investiga- and remarkable not on of its fixation organs, only account tion, specialised to preserve the refrac- but also for the optical precision, diversity of tive properties must be used (Oaten, 1994). -
Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report LR22
Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report Benthic Invertebrate Component - 2017/18 LR22 26 March 2018 Author: Tim Worsfold Reviewer: David Hall, NMBAQCS Project Manager Approved by: Myles O'Reilly, Contract Manager, SEPA Contact: [email protected] MODULE / EXERCISE DETAILS Module: Laboratory Reference (LR) Exercises: LR22 Data/Sample Request Circulated: 10th July 2017 Sample Submission Deadline: 31st August 2017 Number of Subscribing Laboratories: 7 Number of LR Received: 4 Contents Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Table 2. Summary of identification policy differences in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (original identifications in brackets). Appendix. LR22 individual summary reports for participating laboratories. Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Taxonomic Major Taxonomic Group LabCode Edits Polychaeta Oligochaeta Crustacea Mollusca Other Spio symphyta (Spio filicornis ) - Leucothoe procera (Leucothoe ?richardii ) - - Scolelepis bonnieri (Scolelepis squamata ) - - - - BI_2402 5 Laonice (Laonice sarsi ) - - - - Dipolydora (Dipolydora flava ) - - - - Goniada emerita (Goniadella bobrezkii ) - Nebalia reboredae (Nebalia bipes ) - - Polydora sp. A (Polydora cornuta ) - Diastylis rathkei (Diastylis cornuta ) - - BI_2403 7 Syllides? (Anoplosyllis edentula ) - Abludomelita obtusata (Tryphosa nana ) - in mixture - - Spirorbinae (Ditrupa arietina ) - - - - -
Tricolia Pullus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Tricolia pullus (Linnaeus, 1758) AphiaID: 141700 PHEASANT SHELL Trochida (Ordem) > Trochoidea (Superfamilia) Rainer Borcherding - Schutzstation Wattenmeer, via beachexplorer.org Mouna Antit Sinónimos Eudora pullus (Linnaeus, 1758) Eudora pullus var. mediocris Monterosato, 1917 Eudora pullus var. sanguinolaria Monterosato, 1917 Phasianella crassa Brusina, 1865 Phasianella fascicularis Dautzenberg, 1911 Phasianella pontica Milaschewitsch, 1909 Phasianella pulla [sic] Phasianella pulla var. albina Monterosato, 1880 Phasianella pulla var. tricolor Monterosato, 1880 Phasianella pulla var. zigzag Monterosato, 1880 Phasianella pullulus Anton, 1838 Phasianella pullus (Linnaeus, 1758) Phasianella pullus var. bipunctata Pallary, 1938 Phasianella pullus var. flammulata Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1884 Phasianella pullus var. lineata Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1884 Phasianella pullus var. rosea Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1884 Phasianella pullus var. unifasciata Monterosato, 1880 Tricolia hoberti brindisfax Nordsieck, 1973 Tricolia milaschevichi Anistratenko & Starobogatov, 1991 1 Tricolia pullus farolita Nordsieck, 1973 Tricolia pullus pullus (Linnaeus, 1758) Tricolia punctata Risso, 1826 Tricolia tricolor (Monterosato in Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1884) Tricoliella punctata (Risso, 1826) Turbo flammeus Salis Marschlins, 1793 Turbo pullus Linnaeus, 1758 Turbo pullus pullus Linnaeus, 1758 Turbo pullus pullus Linnaeus, 1758 Referências additional source Backeljau, T. (1986). Lijst van de recente mariene mollusken van België [List of the recent marine molluscs of Belgium]. Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen: Brussels, Belgium. 106 pp. [details] original description Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Laurentius Salvius: Holmiae. ii, 824 pp., available online athttps://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 [details] basis of record Gofas, S.; Le Renard, J.; Bouchet, P. (2001). Mollusca. in: Costello, M.J. -
Phylum MOLLUSCA
285 MOLLUSCA: SOLENOGASTRES-POLYPLACOPHORA Phylum MOLLUSCA Class SOLENOGASTRES Family Lepidomeniidae NEMATOMENIA BANYULENSIS (Pruvot, 1891, p. 715, as Dondersia) Occasionally on Lafoea dumosa (R.A.T., S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 42-49 fm., on Lafoea dumosa (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368): Eddystone, 29 fm., 1920 (R.W.): 7, 3, 1 and 1 in 4 hauls N.E. of Eddystone, 1948 (V.F.) Breeding: gonads ripe in Aug. (R.A.T.) Family Neomeniidae NEOMENIA CARINATA Tullberg, 1875, p. 1 One specimen Rame-Eddystone Grounds, 29.12.49 (V.F.) Family Proneomeniidae PRONEOMENIA AGLAOPHENIAE Kovalevsky and Marion [Pruvot, 1891, p. 720] Common on Thecocarpus myriophyllum, generally coiled around the base of the stem of the hydroid (S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 43-49 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 367): S. of Rame Head, 27 fm., 1920 (R.W.): N. of Eddystone, 29.3.33 (A.J.S.) Class POLYPLACOPHORA (=LORICATA) Family Lepidopleuridae LEPIDOPLEURUS ASELLUS (Gmelin) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 407, as Chiton; Matthews, 1953, p. 246] Abundant, 15-30 fm., especially on muddy gravel (S.P.): at 9 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 40-43 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368, as Craspedochilus onyx) SALCOMBE. Common in dredge material (Allen and Todd, 1900, p. 210) LEPIDOPLEURUS, CANCELLATUS (Sowerby) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 410, as Chiton; Matthews. 1953, p. 246] Wembury West Reef, three specimens at E.L.W.S.T. by J. Brady, 28.3.56 (G.M.S.) Family Lepidochitonidae TONICELLA RUBRA (L.) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. -
109 Annotated Checklist Of
THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2010 Supplement No. 23: 109–129 Date of Publication: 31 Oct.2010 © National University of Singapore ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF ANOMURAN DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS OF THE WORLD (EXCLUSIVE OF THE KIWAOIDEA AND FAMILIES CHIROSTYLIDAE AND GALATHEIDAE OF THE GALATHEOIDEA) PART II – PORCELLANIDAE Masayuki Osawa Research Center for Coastal Lagoon and Environments, Shimane University, 1060 Nishikawatsu-cho, Matsue, Shimane 690-8504, Japan Email: [email protected] Patsy A. McLaughlin Shannon Point Marine Center, Western Washington University, 1900 Shannon Point Road, Anacortes, WA 98221-4042, USA Email: hermit@fi dalgo.net INTRODUCTION Porcellanidae Haworth, 1825 = Porcellaniens H. Milne Edwards, 1837 Ng et al. (2008) and McLaughlin et al. (this volume) referred = Porcellaniadae Randall, 1840 to the “windows” to the literature and the “springboards” for = Porcellanodea Henderson 1888 associating species with their scientifi c names that provided = Porcellainea Holmes, 1900 the foundations for subsequent brachyuran, paguroid and lithodoid research. For the porcellanids, one treatise in particular has provided a similar base upon which virtually all DESCRIPTIVE TERMS AND CURRENT STATUS subsequent porcellanid reports have been patterned. Despite its regional focus, Haig’s (1960) monograph of eastern General morphology. – The general body shape is crab- Pacifi c species included 87 of the 225 species estimated to like and the carapace is well calcifi ed. Regions of the dorsal be present worldwide at the time (Chace, 1951). During the integument are not usually well defi ned. The anterior margin last half century the number of genera has increased from of the carapace is produced into a short rostrum or rostral 14 prior to Haig’s (1960) monograph to 30 and the number lobe. -
PMNHS Bulletin Number 6, Autumn 2016
ISSN 2054-7137 BULLETIN of the PORCUPINE MARINE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY Autumn 2016 — Number 6 Bulletin of the Porcupine Marine Natural History Society No. 6 Autumn 2016 Hon. Chairman — Susan Chambers Hon. Secretary — Frances Dipper National Museums Scotland 18 High St 242 West Granton Road Landbeach Edinburgh EH5 1JA Cambridge CB25 9FT 07528 519465 [email protected] [email protected] Hon. Membership Secretary — Roni Robbins Hon. Treasurer — Jon Moore ARTOO Marine Biology Consultants, Ti Cara, Ocean Quay Marina, Point Lane, Belvidere Road, Cosheston, Southampton SO14 5QY Pembroke Dock, [email protected] Pembrokeshire SA72 4UN 01646 687946 Hon. Records Convenor — Julia Nunn [email protected] Cherry Cottage 11 Ballyhaft Road Hon. Editor — Vicki Howe Newtownards White House, Co. Down BT22 2AW Penrhos, [email protected] Raglan NP15 2LF 07779 278841 — Tammy Horton [email protected] Hon. Web-site Officer National Oceanography Centre, Waterfront Campus, Newsletter Layout & Design European Way, — Teresa Darbyshire Southampton SO14 3ZH Department of Natural Sciences, 023 80 596 352 Amgueddfa Cymru — National Museum Wales, [email protected] Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NP Porcupine MNHS welcomes new members- scientists, 029 20 573 222 students, divers, naturalists and lay people. [email protected] We are an informal society interested in marine natural history and recording particularly in the North Atlantic and ‘Porcupine Bight’. Members receive 2 Bulletins per year which include proceedings -
Echinomermella Matsi (Nematoda)
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published March 23 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Population reductions of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (Echinodermata)in Norway and the distribution of its endoparasite Echinomermella matsi (Nematoda) A. Skadsheim, H. Christie, H. P. Leinaas Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Box 1037 Blindern. N-0315 Oslo. Norway ABSTRACT: Observations of sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (0.F. Miiller) mass mortal- ity at Vega island In mid Norway, and reduced sea urchin density in another area 280 km (aerial line) to the south, initiated a more extensive survey of sea urchin and kelp Laminaria hyperborea (Gunn.) Foslie forest distribution along 700 km of coastline. Records of the distribution and prevalence of the nematode Echinomermella matsi Jones & Hagen, 1987, an endoparasite of S. droebachiensis, were also included as the parasite has been postulated to cause sea UI-chinmass mortality. Sampling was con- centrated in 5 areas of coastline along mid and northern Norway. Each area was studied along a wave exposure gradient. Old kelp forests have persisted along the outermost exposed parts of the coastline despite the 20 yr population outbreak of sea urchins. Inshore of the exposed kelp zone and towards the mainland, sea urchin dominated barren grounds still persisted. The distribution and abundance of S. droebachiensis in the southernmost area (Fraya) was greatly reduced, and expansion of kelp into for- mer barren grounds resulted. Reduced numbers of sea urchins and some macroalgal regrowth also occurred in the 2 central areas 140 and 280 km north of Fraya, whilst high population densities of small sized S. droebachiensis on 'barrens' still dominated the inner zone in the 2 northern areas. -
Safety Assessment of Brown Algae-Derived Ingredients As Used in Cosmetics
Safety Assessment of Brown Algae-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics Status: Draft Report for Panel Review Release Date: August 29, 2018 Panel Meeting Date: September 24-25, 2018 The 2018 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Executive Director is Bart Heldreth, Ph.D. This report was prepared by Lillian C. Becker, former Scientific Analyst/Writer and Priya Cherian, Scientific Analyst/Writer. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1620 L Street, NW, Suite 1200 ♢ Washington, DC 20036-4702 ♢ ph 202.331.0651 ♢ fax 202.331.0088 [email protected] Distributed for Comment Only -- Do Not Cite or Quote Commitment & Credibility since 1976 Memorandum To: CIR Expert Panel Members and Liaisons From: Priya Cherian, Scientific Analyst/Writer Date: August 29, 2018 Subject: Safety Assessment of Brown Algae as Used in Cosmetics Enclosed is the Draft Report of 83 brown algae-derived ingredients as used in cosmetics. (It is identified as broalg092018rep in this pdf.) This is the first time the Panel is reviewing this document. The ingredients in this review are extracts, powders, juices, or waters derived from one or multiple species of brown algae. Information received from the Personal Care Products Council (Council) are attached: • use concentration data of brown algae and algae-derived ingredients (broalg092018data1, broalg092018data2, broalg092018data3); • Information regarding hydrolyzed fucoidan extracted from Laminaria digitata has been included in the report. -
Assessing the Impact of Key Marine Invasive Non-Native Species on Welsh MPA Habitat Features, Fisheries and Aquaculture
Assessing the impact of key Marine Invasive Non-Native Species on Welsh MPA habitat features, fisheries and aquaculture. Tillin, H.M., Kessel, C., Sewell, J., Wood, C.A. Bishop, J.D.D Marine Biological Association of the UK Report No. 454 Date www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk About Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales’ purpose is to pursue sustainable management of natural resources. This means looking after air, land, water, wildlife, plants and soil to improve Wales’ well-being, and provide a better future for everyone. Evidence at Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales is an evidence based organisation. We seek to ensure that our strategy, decisions, operations and advice to Welsh Government and others are underpinned by sound and quality-assured evidence. We recognise that it is critically important to have a good understanding of our changing environment. We will realise this vision by: Maintaining and developing the technical specialist skills of our staff; Securing our data and information; Having a well resourced proactive programme of evidence work; Continuing to review and add to our evidence to ensure it is fit for the challenges facing us; and Communicating our evidence in an open and transparent way. This Evidence Report series serves as a record of work carried out or commissioned by Natural Resources Wales. It also helps us to share and promote use of our evidence by others and develop future collaborations. However, the views and recommendations presented in this report are not necessarily those of -
Acanthochitona Crinita (Pennant, 1777)
Acanthochitona crinita (Pennant, 1777) AphiaID: 138675 CHITON © Vasco Ferreira - OMARE / Dez. 30 2018 Marta Martins Serge Gofas © Marta Martins - CIIMAR 1 © Marta Martins - CIIMAR © Marta Martins - CIIMAR Facilmente confundível com: Acanthochitona fascicularis Quítone Principais ameaças Sinónimos Acanthochaetes vulgaris Leach, 1852 Acanthochites adansoni Rochebrune, 1881 Acanthochites aeneus Risso, 1826, sensu Monterosato, 1879 2 Acanthochites carinatus Risso, 1826 Acanthochites fascicularis (Linnaeus, 1767) Acanthochites fascicularis var. cinnabrina Dautzenberg & Durouchoux, 1906 Acanthochites fascicularis var. fusca Dautzenberg & Durouchoux, 1906 Acanthochites fascicularis var. lutescens Dautzenberg & Durouchoux, 1906 Acanthochiton adansoni (Rochebrune, 1881) Acanthochitona crinita crinita (Pennant, 1777) Acanthochitona crinitus (Pennant) Acanthochitona gracilis (Jeffreys, 1859) Chiton crinitus Pennant, 1777 Chiton fascicularis var. attenuata Jeffreys, 1865 Chiton fascicularis var. minor Philippi, 1836 Chiton onyx Spengler, 1797 Chiton onyx Spengler, 1797 Referências basis of record Gofas, S.; Le Renard, J.; Bouchet, P. (2001). Mollusca. in: Costello, M.J. et al. (eds), European Register of Marine Species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Patrimoines Naturels. 50: 180-213. [details] subsequent type designation Kaas, P. (1985). The genus Acanthochitona Gray, 1821 (Mollusca, Polyplacophora) in the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean and in the Mediterranean Sea, with designation of neotypes of A. fascicularis (L. 1767) and of A. crinita (Pennant, 1777). Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (section A Zoologie). (4) 7 (3): 579-603., available online at http://bibliotheques.mnhn.fr/EXPLOITATION/infodoc/ged/viewportalpublished.ashx?eid=IFD_FICJOINT_B MAZO_S004_1985_T007_N003_1 [details] status source Bonfitto, A., Dell’Angelo, B., Evangelisti, F. & Sabelli, B. (2011). The genus Acanthochitona (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) in the Mediterranean Sea: morphological and molecular data.