DOCSLIB.ORG

Does Mental Health and Guardianship Legislation in Western Australia (WA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Does Mental Health and Guardianship Legislation in Western Australia (WA Does mental health and guardianship legislation in Western Australia (WA) protect elderly persons from human rights abuse, and ensure procedural and substantive justice? Neville Francis Hills The University of Western Australia This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia The work presented in this thesis was performed in the Law School 2016 Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Declaration This is to certify that this thesis does not incorporate, without acknowledgement, any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma from any university and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. Signed Name Neville Francis Hills Date December 1, 2016 i Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Abstract This thesis addresses matters affecting the liberty, rights and welfare of older people in Western Australia (WA). Restriction of personal liberty to choose where to live, and who to associate with, is usually only permitted under criminal law, following legal processes. Mental health legislation also permits restraints on freedom of individuals, subject to legal oversight of the process. Admission into an aged care facility may restrict a person’s liberty, if placed in a locked area which they cannot leave without staff assistance. Laws regulating these procedures should be fair, open to scrutiny, and meeting international standards of law and good practice. In 2015 there were 16,350 Commonwealth funded aged care beds in 263 facilities in WA. Records indicating which of these facilities are locked always are not kept, although accreditation standards require attention to security and safety of residents. Over 50% of residents have dementia or related conditions, potentially affecting their decision-making capacity. The WA Public Guardian has sole decision-making responsibility for 1,383 individuals, not all of whom are in aged care, suggesting the majority are placed under informal arrangements. These informal admissions are not routinely monitored by any form of legal safeguarding or oversight. Some elderly people informally admitted to mental health facilities, also have no protection under mental health legislation, and no access to official advocates. Informal detention in aged care, has received substantial examination overseas and in other states of Australia. In WA, authorities up to now have shown limited interest in the ethical and human rights aspects. The ‘Bournewood’ case in England provoked ii Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law substantial attention and litigation, but the lessons derived have not received attention in WA. Unlike the UK, there is no Human Rights Act in WA, nor any right of independent appeal to an international court. The fact that mental health care and legislation is a state responsibility, while aged care is under Commonwealth government control, creates a gap in ownership of this problem. Laws regulating admission to psychiatric hospitals in WA, owe their origins to historical developments in English law and procedures, handed down in the colonial era. These have been modified in each jurisdiction with the passage of time and local influences. The extent of this divergence is examined in this thesis by two methods; a table of comparisons set out in chapter 3, and an opinion survey of psychiatrists in chapter 4, with further chapters discussing legal and practical issues. Current views on capacity and consent are discussed, followed by consideration of risks with non-consenting detention in aged care, including elder abuse and potential harm. The thesis examined the position up to November 30, 1915 while the Mental Health Act 1996 (WA) was in operation. There are comments in chapter 8 on the Mental Health Act 2014 (WA) and its ability to address some of these matters. English reports indicate serious problems with the costly and burdensome legislation adopted in that country. The thesis concludes with suggested measures which may assist in remedying some of the reported defects in current law and practice, while avoiding unduly complex and ineffective legislation. iii Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Acknowledgements Thanks, are due to Daniel Stepniak UWA principal supervisor, and Brenda McGivern, who have encouraged me in this task, and tolerated with great equanimity, my efforts to adopt legal styles and accuracy in argument. Secondly, and not least I thank my wife Roberta, who has shown great patience and support in my many absences, both at home and away. Thirdly, I acknowledge the contribution to my understanding of law and psychiatry which I have received over many years from patients, carers and fellow workers. Assistance with editing from Ceridwen Clocherty was much appreciated. iv Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Statement of candidate contribution This thesis is entirely my own authorship. The thesis is 90864 words in length, excluding footnotes, bibliography and appendices. v Thesis: Doctor of Philosophy – Mental Health Law Contents Declaration .................................................................................................................................................. i Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... iv Statement of candidate contribution .........................................................................................................v Contents ..................................................................................................................................................... vi Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... xiii 1 Introduction and review of the field .............................................................................................. 14 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 14 1.2 What is the problem that this thesis addresses? ...................................................................... 14 1.3 Examples of a problem ............................................................................................................... 15 1.3.1 Case 1: WA ......................................................................................................................... 16 1.3.2 Case 2: England .................................................................................................................. 17 1.4 Australian Federal and State jurisdictions ............................................................................... 21 1.4.1 Structure of government ..................................................................................................... 22 1.5 Admission to hospitals and aged care homes ........................................................................... 23 1.6 Psychiatrists and law .................................................................................................................. 26 1.7 What is the place of law in relation to the rights and care of elderly people? ....................... 30 1.8 Common law ............................................................................................................................... 31 1.9 Necessity ...................................................................................................................................... 33 1.9.1 Human rights and international obligations ........................................................................ 34 1.10 Health and Mental Health Legislation ................................................................................. 34 1.10.1 Procedural justice (fairness) ........................................................................................... 36 1.10.2 Substantive justice .......................................................................................................... 36 1.10.3 Legal issues of relevance to WA .................................................................................... 37 1.10.4 What is already known on this subject that is relevant to WA? ..................................... 45 1.10.5 Neville Barber: civil commitment and review ............................................................... 46 1.10.6 UWA research theses ..................................................................................................... 47 1.10.7 Elder abuse ..................................................................................................................... 47 1.10.8 Psychiatric practice in WA ............................................................................................. 49 1.10.9 Legislation and procedures to protect the interests of the elderly .................................. 50 1.10.10 Literature ........................................................................................................................ 52 1.11 Guardianship ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Changing Mental Health Legislation in the UK† Tony Zigmond
    Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2008), vol. 14, 81–83 doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.107.005116 Editorial Changing mental health legislation in the UK† Tony Zigmond Abstract Following devolution, the mental health acts of the constituent countries of the UK are diverging in their provisions. This editorial describes three significant differences between the new Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003, which came into effect in Scotland in 2005, and the Mental Health Act 2007 for England and Wales. Devolution, in relation to mental health law, has It has been argued that we should not have come of age. The Mental Health (Care and Treat- any separate mental health legislation and that ment) (Scotland) Act 2003 is very different both the mental capacity legislation, with perhaps from its forerunner in Scotland and from the Men- some additional safeguards, should be the basis tal Health Act 1983 for England and Wales, even as for all non-consensual treatment (Zigmond, 1998; amended by the Mental Health Act 2007. Should Szmukler & Holloway, 1998). The proposals for the report of the Bamford Review of the legislative Northern Ireland are in line with this approach. The framework in Northern Ireland (Bamford Review of College in England and Wales took the view, as had Mental Health and Learning Disability (NI), 2007) already been accepted in Scotland, that the criteria be accepted and turned into a mental health act then for determining capacity as set out in the Mental we will have a third, very distinct, piece of mental Capacity Act 2005 are too narrow for use with people health law with in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Conceptualization in Adolescents Through Semantic Networks K
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences Vol:13, No:4, 2019 Suicide Conceptualization in Adolescents through Semantic Networks K. P. Valdés García, E. I. Rodríguez Fonseca, L. G. Juárez Cantú 1 the group, an example of this can be seen in cultures were the Abstract—Suicide is a global, multidimensional and dynamic weakest of a village decided to abandon it and die so that problem of mental health, which requires a constant study for its those who stayed had more resources. Also, some acceptable understanding and prevention. When research of this phenomenon is cultural forms of suicide such as seppuku or hara-kiri, done, it is necessary to consider the different characteristics it may have because of the individual and sociocultural variables, the Japanese rituals of samurai suicide, and the mass suicide of the importance of this consideration is related to the generation of disciples of Confucius, who made this decision after their effective treatments and interventions. Adolescents are a vulnerable teacher’s books were burned as a sign of protest [2]. population due to the characteristics of the development stage. The In classical Greece, the problem of suicide was addressed as investigation was carried out with the objective of identifying and a political analysis in which authors such as Aristotle and describing the conceptualization of adolescents of suicide, and in this Plato condemned the suicidal act, seeing it as a problem, with process, we find possible differences between men and women. The study was carried out in Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. The sample was a negative view of the act that even impregnated legal aspects, composed of 418 volunteer students aged between 11 and 18 years.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RIGHTS and WRONGS of the PSYCHOPATH in CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTROD
    THE RIGHTS AND WRONGS OF THE PSYCHOPATH IN CRIMINAL LAW: HOW MODERN SCIENCE MUST RESHAPE OLD POLICY. © Jasmine Nicolson* INTRODUCTION Psychopaths have long been enshrined in both popular culture and in law as the face of evil and danger;1 their classic characteristics of callousness, impulsivity, and remorselessness have helped to cement the conceptual link between psychopathy and violent crime.2 Psychiatrists from the 19th century, with all the equipment they had available at the time, made sweeping generalisations about the nature of the disorder. Pinel described patients who appeared without delusions or psychosis, as mentally unimpaired but engaged in impulsive acts of ‘instincte fureur’.3 Prichard built upon this definition to develop the concept of ‘moral insanity’. This term has evolved since its original intent – coming from the original French, ‘moral’ was taken to mean ‘emotional’ rather than ethical – and so the original ‘moral insanity’ was a ‘madness’ of emotional disposition and social ability, but without hallucinations or delusions.4 The concept has since evolved to include a lack of comprehension and appreciation of ethics and morality,5 but ultimately the M’Naghten rules in 1842 forged the legal defence of insanity, which required a clear presence of delusion, rather than a mere lack of morality.6 Both jurisdictions of England and Scotland have since built upon this to include an inability to 1 Cary Federman, Dave Holmes, and Jean Daniel Jacob, "Deconstructing the Psychopath: A Critical Discursive Analysis," Cultural Critique 72, no. 1 (2009). 2 Eric Silver, Edward P. Mulvey, and John Monahan, "Assessing Violence Risk among Discharged Psychiatric Patients: Toward an Ecological Approach," Law and Human Behavior 23, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision-Making Behaviour Under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: an English Perspective
    laws Article Decision-Making Behaviour under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Its Impact on Mental Health Tribunals: An English Perspective Nicola Glover-Thomas ID School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; [email protected] Received: 21 February 2018; Accepted: 20 March 2018; Published: 24 March 2018 Abstract: In England and Wales, the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) provides the legal framework which governs decisions made concerning the care and treatment of those suffering from mental disorders, where they may pose a risk to themselves or others. The perspective of the patient and the care provider may conflict and can be a source of tension and challenge within mental health law. Through access to a mental health tribunal, patients are offered the apparatus to review and challenge their detention. With detention rates under the mental health legislation rising exponentially, this is having a knock-on effect upon tribunal application numbers. As there is a legal requirement to review all cases of individuals detained under the MHA 1983, understanding the key drivers for this increase in detention is essential in order to understand how to better manage both detention rates and the upsurge in tribunal caseloads. With the increase in overall activity, mental health tribunal workloads present significant practical challenges and has downstream cost implications. Keywords: detention; caseload; mental health tribunal; Mental Health Act 1983; decision-making; risk; costs 1. Introduction Mental illness costs the UK economy £100 billion a year (Johnson 2016; McCrone et al. 2008). In 2012, the Her Majesty’s (HM) Government spent £126 billion on health (HM Treasury 2011, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mental Health Act Code of Practice for Wales 2016
    Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice for Wales Review Revised 2016 Mae’r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. © Crown copyright 2016 WG29375 Digital ISBN 978-1-4734-7176-4 Print ISBN 978-1-4734-7177-1 Contents Foreword by the Cabinet Secretary for Health, Well-being and Sport 1 Introduction 3 1 Guiding Principles 8 2 Definition of mental disorder 13 3 Human rights and reducing inequalities 15 4 Information for patients, nearest relatives, families, carers and others 17 5 Nearest relative 25 6 Independent mental health advocacy 30 7 Attorneys and deputies 40 8 Privacy, dignity and safety 42 9 Views expressed in advance 50 10 Confidentiality and information sharing 53 11 Visiting patients in hospital 57 12 The Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales 61 13 Relationship between the Mental Health Act, the Mental Capacity Act and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards 67 14 Applications for detention in hospital 75 15 Emergency applications for detention 93 16 Police powers and places of safety 95 17 Transport of patients 105 18 Holding powers 111 19 Children and young people under the age of 18 116 20 People with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder 128 21 People with personality disorders 135 22 Patients concerned with criminal proceedings 138 23 Appropriate medical treatment 153 24 Medical treatment 156 25 Treatments subject to special rules and procedures 168 26 Safe and therapeutic responses to challenging behaviour 183 27 Leave of absence 193 28 Absence without leave 199 29 Community
    [Show full text]
  • Living Conditions of Adolescents Who Have Attempted Suicide in Mexico
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Living Conditions of Adolescents Who Have Attempted Suicide in Mexico Rosario Valdez-Santiago 1, Alma Lilia Cruz-Bañares 2, Anabel Rojas-Carmona 3,* and Luz Arenas-Monreal 1 1 National Institute of Public Health, 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico; [email protected] (R.V.-S.); [email protected] (L.A.-M.) 2 Independent researcher, 54060 Estado de México, Mexico; [email protected] 3 Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, 60430-160 Ceará, Brazil * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 June 2020; Accepted: 13 August 2020; Published: 18 August 2020 Abstract: Suicidal behavior represents a complex public health problem, with a rising number of suicide attempts registered among Mexican adolescents. We undertook a qualitative study in order to understand the living conditions of adolescents who had attempted to take their lives in five Mexican states. We interviewed 37 adolescents who had engaged in suicide attempts in the year prior to our study. To code and analyze the information, we defined the following three categories of living conditions as social determinants of health for adolescents: poverty and vulnerability, education, and health care. To this end, we followed the methodology proposed by Taylor and Bogdan, and used Atlas.ti 7.5.18 software for analyses. Among our findings, we noted that poverty, manifested primarily as material deprivation, rendered the daily lives of our interviewees precarious, compromising even their basic needs. All the young people analyzed had either received medical, psychological, and/or psychiatric care as outpatients or had been hospitalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Coercion and Consent O N M I O Topics Covered Include: Monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 M I S S
    HEALT AL H T A N C E T . M In its thirteenth and final biennial report, the Mental Health Act Commission provides data and . C observations from its monitoring of the use of the Mental Health Act between 2007 and 2009. Coercion and consent O N M I O Topics covered include: monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 M I S S UÊÌ>Êw`}ÃÊÊÌ iÊÕÃiÊvÊiÜÊ«ÜiÀÃÊvÊ-Õ«iÀÛÃi`Ê ÕÌÞÊ/Ài>ÌiÌÊÊ UÊÌ iÊvÀVLiÊÌÀi>ÌiÌÊvÊ«>ÌiÌÃÊ`iÌ>i`ÊÕ`iÀÊÌ iÊiÌ>Êi>Ì ÊVÌÊ£nÎÊÊÊ consent and Coercion The Mental Health Act Commission UÊÌ iÊiÌ>Êi>Ì ÊVÌÊ>`ÊiÌ>ÞÊ`ÃÀ`iÀi`Êvvi`iÀÃÊ Thirteenth Biennial Report 2007–2009 UÊ`>Ì>ÊÊ`i>Ì ÃÊvÊ`iÌ>i`Ê«>ÌiÌÃÊLiÌÜiiÊÓääxÊ>`ÊÓään The report also highlights several areas for future research and monitoring, and draws these to the >ÌÌiÌÊvÊÌÃÊÃÕVViÃÃÀÊL`Þ]ÊÌ iÊ >ÀiÊ+Õ>ÌÞÊ ÃÃ°Ê monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 Act Health Mental the monitoring ÛiÀÊ«VÌÕÀiÊLÞÊ Àii]Ê>Ê«>ÌiÌÊÊÌ iÊ"/Ê`i«>ÀÌiÌÊvÊ-iÛiÀ>ÃÊëÌ>]Ê V iÃÌiÀ]Ê Ê£ÇÓ°Ê ÀiiÊ >`Ê >`ÊÌÜÊiÕVÌiÃÊÊÌ iÊ£xäÃ]Ê>ÌÊ>ÊÌiÊÜ iÊ iÀÊVÃÕÌ>ÌÊ «ÃÞV >ÌÀÃÌÊVÃ`iÀi`ÊLÀ>ÊÃÕÀ}iÀÞÊÌ iÊÌÀi>ÌiÌÊvÊV ViÊvÀÊÃV â« Ài>°Ê ISBN 978-0-11-322836-2 www.tso.co.uk 9 780113 228362 5991 MHAC Cover V0 3 indd 1 424987 Mental Health21/5/09 15:52:43 13th_C The Mental Health Act Commission Coercion and consent monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009 MHAC Thirteenth Biennial Report 2007–2009 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraph 13 of Schedule 4 to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Commencement No.9, Consequential Amendments and Transitory, Transitional and Saving Provisions) Order 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Suicide Burden of Mortality in México 1990-2017
    DOI: 10.1590/1980-549720200069 ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL / ORIGINAL ARTICLE Estudio de la carga de la mortalidad por suicidio en México 1990-2017 Study of suicide burden of mortality in México 1990-2017 Claudio Alberto Dávila CervantesI , Ana Melisa Pardo MontañoII RESUMEN: Objetivo: El principal objetivo fue analizar el nivel y la tendencia de la carga de mortalidad del suicidio en México entre 1990 y 2017, a escala nacional y estatal. Métodos: Análisis secundario basado en el estudio de la Carga Global de la Enfermedad de 2017. Se reportan tasas de mortalidad y los años de vida perdidos por muerte prematura (APMP). Para analizar la tendencia de los APMP se realizó un análisis de regresión joinpoint basado en el modelo log-lineal. Resultados: La carga de la enfermedad por suicidio se incrementó en México, principalmente en hombres y mujeres jóvenes; aunque el aumento en los adultos mayores es un reto adicional para los servicios de salud. La carga de la enfermedad varía sustancialmente entre los estados del país. Las tasas de mortalidad masculinas fueron mayores a las femeninas durante todo el periodo de estudio, aunque con una tendencia a reducir la diferencia entre ambos sexos. Se observó un patrón bimodal de la carga de la enfermedad por suicidio en México, con mayores tasas en los 15-19 años de edad y un importante incremento a partir de los 85 años de edad. Conclusión: los resultados obtenidos ponen de manifiesto un panorama preocupante, no solo desde el punto de vista social, económico y de salud, sino también en cuanto a las necesidades en materia de políticas públicas.
    [Show full text]
  • Restricting Movement Or Depriving Liberty? Restricting Movement Or Depriving Liberty? Neil Allen1
    Restricting Movement or Depriving Liberty? Restricting Movement or Depriving Liberty? Neil Allen1 “It is of course helpful to know that the question is one of degree and the matters which should be taken into account in answering it. But one also needs to be told what the question is. What is the criterion for deciding whether someone has been deprived of liberty or not?”2 This judicial appeal for clarity exposes a jurisprudential problem which threatens one of our most fundamental human values; the right to liberty. For no-one really knows what it means to be “deprived” of one’s “liberty”. The extremities are straightforward. Prisoners are deprived; picnickers are not. But liberty deprivations may “take numerous other forms [whose] variety is being increased by developments in legal standards and in attitudes”.3 Technology, too, has played its part in such developments by introducing novel ways of restricting movement beyond the paradigmatic lock and key. The more expansive those other forms, however, the greater the risk of legal uncertainty. The challenge in this paper is one of interpretation. Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 protects the “liberty and security of person” which is said to have a “Council of Europe-wide meaning”.4 But how should this autonomous concept be transposed into English law? Adopting Berlin’s classic dichotomy,5 does liberty relate to the absence of external barriers or constraints, where we enjoy it to the extent that no-one is preventing us from doing whatever we might want to do (negative liberty)? Or does it concern the presence of internal factors, where we enjoy liberty to the extent that we are able to take control of our lives and self-determine in our own interests (positive liberty)?6 These complex philosophical perspectives cannot be ignored and are, to varying degrees, protected by other Convention articles.7 But article 5 is not concerned with such broad notions of liberty because it contemplates liberty in its classic sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by Linda English
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-909-72651-2 — Mental Illness, Human Rights and the Law Brendan D. Kelly Index More Information Index Compiled by Linda English admission order 17 Bentham, Jeremy 4, 6 Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 best interests 16, 18, 45, 57 72, 93–94 Mental Capacity Bill 2015 69–70, 74, 75, advance statements: Scotland 150, 152, 79, 86, 97, 100, 204, 215 153–155, 166 Mental Health Act 2001 120–121, 122, advocacy 123, 130, 131 ECHR 20 Mental Health (Care and Treatment) Mental Capacity Bill 2015 85–86, 98 (Scotland) Act 2003 145–146, 147–148 Mental Health Act 2007 57–58, 60, 86, Better Services for the Mentally Ill (White Paper) 199 36 Mental Health (Care and Treatment) Bill of Rights 1689: English 3–4 (Scotland) Act 2003 135, 139, 149, 155 Bill of Rights 1791: US 4 power 190, 194–195, 196, 199 Burke, Edmund 5, 6 social advocacy 214 alcohol or drugs addiction 16, 37, 48, 94–95, Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam 109 11 Aristotle 2 capacity see mental capacity Ashworth Hospital 42–43 Care in the Community (DHSS) 36 Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill Chartism 5 2013 31, 70, 72, 73, 93–94, 95–96 China 192–193, 194, 198 asylums 7–8, 13, 35, 104, 181 chlorpromazine 13 asylum seekers 178 Cicero: natural law 3, 4 autonomy 211 civil partners: nearest relative 52, 59 dignity and 38, 57, 58, 61, 102, 150 Civil Partnership Act 2004 52 Ireland 122, 129, 130, 206, 207 clinical practice: rights promotion 211, Mental Health Act 2007 52–53, 56, 57, 58, 212–213 61 Clunis, Christopher 40 Northern Ireland 64, 65,
    [Show full text]
  • A SUMMARY of MENTAL HEALTH CASELAW Scott Blair, Advocate
    A SUMMARY OF MENTAL HEALTH CASELAW Scott Blair, Advocate BACKGROUND In December 2011 the Mental Heath Tribunal for Scotland (“MHTS”) published an excellent Digest of Cases covering the work of the MHTS until around the summer of 2011. The Digest was principally concerned with appeal decisions. Inspired by this I thought there might be merit in offering up a further contribution to this area. I have included cases decided since the Digest was published and have also included cases not mentioned in the Digest. For what they are worth I have offered my comments on these cases based on both my experience as an advocate in legal practice but also as a Convener of the MHTS. The MHTS has been with us for some time now and there is now a fair body of case law. This is my own contribution to a growing recognition of the need for collections of case law which are accessible and as up to date as possible in this field of Scots law. It is fair to say that the Scottish section of this paper would not have been possible but for the efforts of Valerie Mays at MHTS who led the way with the Digest which made my own task one where I was not starting from a “standing start”. The Scottish section follows a similar format to the Digest. That is deliberate. The approach taken in the Digest is excellent and makes the task of the reader an easy one. I acknowledge my profound debt to her for her earlier work. In the Scottish section, unless the context suggests otherwise, references to the Act, the 2003 Act or a Section are to be taken to be references to the Mental Health (Care and Treatment)(Scotland) Act 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • 00 MENTAL HEALTH 2012 Edn 00-291.Qxd 22/12/11 14:21 Page 1
    00 MENTAL HEALTH 2012 edn 00-291.qxd 22/12/11 14:21 Page 1 Chapter 1 Background to the Mental Health Act 2007 Introduction The Mental Health Act, as passed in 2007 and largely implemented in 2008, is the result of ten years of debate. Many will see the Act as a disappointing conclusion to such a lengthy period of discussion and analysis. It is essentially an amendment Act which reforms the existing Mental Health Act 1983. In its final version the Act is not a particularly radical reform and it preserves most of the existing law. The UK Government’s initial plans were more radical but they met significant resistance as we shall see in this chapter. We will also look at the main changes in summary form. The structure of this book This book is essentially concerned with the Mental Health Act 1983 as revised by the 2007 amendments and as it operates in England and Wales. There are some differences between the two countries in terms of the Act but more significantly with the various rules, regulations and Codes of Practice. We try to highlight the differences where they are significant. The text of the Act itself is included within this book but occasionally readers may need to access the internet or seek other source materials for particular references (such as the Reference Guide). The book contains some material on the Mental Capacity Act because of its relevance to mental health law. The aim is to simplify the law as far as possible to make it accessible to professionals and to those affected by the law.
    [Show full text]