Evolution in Action White Animals at White Sands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution in Action White Animals at White Sands National Park Service White Sands Department of the Interior White Sands National Monument Evolution in Action: White Animals at White Sands here has been dramatic convergent evolution of light coloration for many of the animals which inhabit the stark Twhite gypsum dunes of White Sands National Monument. A number of different animal groups (including insects, spiders, toads, lizards, mammals) have blanched coloration on the white dunes and dark coloration in the surrounding dark desert soils (see Table 1). The gypsum sands are geologically recent, formed since the end of the last glaciation. Because of the young age of White Sands, we know that animals with lighter coloration have adapted to their environment quickly, as a result of strong natural selection. White Sands is therefore a dramatic showcase for evolution in action. The rapid, convergent evolution of blanched coloration in many species experiencing the same environment allows us to ask several important questions about the role of natural selection in generating biological diversity. Why did light coloration evolve? Natural selection for substrate matching Animals become better adapted to environment and had more offspring Particularly for small diurnal animals, their environment by a process called than the darker lizards. Because the we would expect strong selection for natural selection. Traits that increase light-colored individuals were more substrate matching to avoid being an individual’s reproductive success likely to survive and reproduce, the seen by visual predators. Although by improving its fit to the environment frequency of light-colored lizards no studies have directly measured tend to spread in a population. Light would increase in the next generation. predation intensity on White Sands coloration could evolve through natural After many generations of selection animals, many researchers have shown selection in dune animals if individuals for lighter individuals, the population that well-camouflaged animals are with light-coloration survived better or could eventually become white. less likely to be taken by predators reproduced more than individuals with But why would lighter individuals (Kiltie, 1992). Avian predators, such dark coloration. Imagine a population survive and reproduce better on as roadrunners and shrikes likely of dark colored lizards moving from the the gypsum dunes? There are two represent a significant threat for small brown desert soil into the white dunes. primary hypotheses for why natural animals at White Sands. Camouflage, Assume there is natural variation in selection would favor light individuals: or crypsis, is therefore essential for color in lizard populations, some camouflage and thermoregulation. survival. Even nocturnal animals can individuals being slightly darker and Natural selection for camouflage is the benefit from matching their habitat, some slightly lighter. Also assume that most likely explanation for the light because many nocturnal predators use coloration is heritable, with offspring coloration observed at White Sands vision to find prey illuminated inheriting their color pattern from but the effects of light coloration on Lowe, 1964). Also, predators can their parents. Suppose that the lighter thermoregulation require further benefit from matching their substrate individuals survived better in this new study. as to avoid detection by prey. Natural selection for thermoregulation Another possibility is that lighter coloration has evolved for thermoregulation. Lighter-colored individuals that are active during the day may be better able to regulate body temperature because they reflect more of the intense desert sunlight (Benson, 1933). However, many of the white animals are nocturnal, so regulating absorption of the sun’s rays would not be an important selective factor. Additionally, there is no evidence that temperatures at White Sands are any more intense than in the surrounding dark soil habitat. In Color variation of earless lizard and bleached earless lizard in their environments fact, air and substrate temperatures at White Sands are actually lower for flexible coloration must have been an animal white. The only species than on the dark soils (Hager 2000, more likely to survive, reproduce, for which this appears likely is the Rosenblum unpublished). Hager even and pass their flexible-color genes on white lycosid spider (Table 2), which suggests that lighter colored lizards to their offspring. Bugbee (1942) described as “brown are at a disadvantage because they Third, it is possible that light in basic color but its abdomen usually cannot warm as quickly as their dark coloration did not evolve through appeared as if covered with hoar- soil counterparts. Although substrate natural selection but is simply picked frost.” Because “this white color was temperatures are not unusually high at up from the environment. Color can easily rubbed off when individual White Sands, it is still possible that large be picked up from the environment specimens were handled,” it is heat loads are imposed on animals either from dietary pigments (i.e.: possible that the white color is derived because of the reflective properties of pigments acquired from the food from external substances. However, gypsum. Further study is necessary, cause an animal to become white) it is also possible that the substance but current evidence is most consistent or from direct accumulation (i.e.: that is easily rubbed off is deposited with light coloration as an adaptation gypsum sand on the skin makes an by the spider and is internally for camouflage not thermoregulation. animal appear white). The third derived. Since light coloration possibility, that light color is acquired is unlikely to be derived directly What mechanism produces directly from the environment, from the environment, we must white coloration? is unlikely for most White Sand differentiate between the remaining species. First of all, light coloration two hypotheses: that individual color There are three possible mechanisms is probably not caused by diet. There is fixed or that individuals are able to explain how light coloration is are pigments which are known to to change their color to match their produced in White Sands animals. be acquired from the diet in birds current substrate. These predictions First, light coloration may be fixed for and reptiles. However these dietary have been most thoroughly tested in each individual from birth. For fixed pigments (called carotenoids) result lizards. coloration to evolve, lighter-colored in yellow and red, not blanched, animals must have been more likely coloration. to survive, reproduce, and pass their Second, Benson (1933) argued light-color genes on to their offspring. that it is unlikely for herbivorous Second, individuals may be able to animals to turn white from ingesting change color during their lifetimes certain plants. Plants at White to match their current substrate. Sands are similar to plants present Changing color in response to the in other areas of the Tularosa Basin environment is a type of phenotypic and probably take up substances plasticity and is known to occur in similar to those growing in alkaline other animals such as chameleons soils elsewhere. It is still possible and anoles. For such a mechanism to that direct accumulation of gypsum White Sands collared lizard evolve, individuals with genes coding dust or sand on the skin could turn Coloration in lizards or flexible in the bleached earless in response to temperature. She lizard (H. maculata). He collected collected white and non-white Many species of lizards are able to white lizards from the dunes and individuals from all three lizard quickly change their color in response non-white individuals from areas species which inhabit the gypsum to external and internal conditions, near the dunes. He photographed dunes (H. maculata, S. undulatus including temperature, exposure all animals to record their color and and A. inornata). She exposed the to light, and individual health and then placed them into laboratory lizards to hot and cold temperatures excitatory state (Smith, 1946; Norris cages with either white quartz sand and used a spectrophotometer to 1965). Some lizards, like chameleons or finely ground black cinders. None quantify coloration. All three lizard and anoles, can even change color of the lizards in Bundy’s experiment species did become slightly darker to more closely match their current changed colors to match the ground with colder temperatures. However, substrate. These rapid color changes color in their cages. even when cold, white lizards never are termed physiological plasticity become as dark as dark lizards. and occur as reptiles shift the Therefore rapid color change in distribution of pigments between response to the environment cannot different cell layers. Melanin, the explain observed light coloration pigment responsible for overall (Table 2). body darkness, is located in Rosenblum then tested whether melanophore cells. Melanophore color is fixed throughout a lizard’s cells are distributed several layers lifetime. She collected gravid below the surface of the skin but (pregnant) females from H. also have dendritic processes which maculata and S. undulatus from reach just below the inner surface the gypsum dunes and from nearby of the skin. Reptiles can darken dark soil habitats. She raised the or lighten in color by dispersing or eggs and newborn hatchlings aggregating melanin granules along Bleached earless lizard from
Recommended publications
  • REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: PHRYNOSOMATIDAE Sceloporus Poinsettii
    856.1 REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: PHRYNOSOMATIDAE Sceloporus poinsettii Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. Webb, R.G. 2008. Sceloporus poinsettii. Sceloporus poinsettii Baird and Girard Crevice Spiny Lizard Sceloporus poinsettii Baird and Girard 1852:126. Type-locality, “Rio San Pedro of the Rio Grande del Norte, and the province of Sonora,” restricted to either the southern part of the Big Burro Moun- tains or the vicinity of Santa Rita, Grant County, New Mexico by Webb (1988). Lectotype, National Figure 1. Adult male Sceloporus poinsettii poinsettii (UTEP Museum of Natural History (USNM) 2952 (subse- 8714) from the Magdalena Mountains, Socorro County, quently recataloged as USNM 292580), adult New Mexico (photo by author). male, collected by John H. Clark in company with Col. James D. Graham during his tenure with the U.S.-Mexican Boundary Commission in late Au- gust 1851 (examined by author). See Remarks. Sceloporus poinsetii: Duméril 1858:547. Lapsus. Tropidolepis poinsetti: Dugès 1869:143. Invalid emendation (see Remarks). Sceloporus torquatus Var. C.: Bocourt 1874:173. Sceloporus poinsetti: Yarrow “1882"[1883]:58. Invalid emendation. S.[celoporus] t.[orquatus] poinsettii: Cope 1885:402. Seloporus poinsettiii: Herrick, Terry, and Herrick 1899:123. Lapsus. Sceloporus torquatus poinsetti: Brown 1903:546. Sceloporus poissetti: Král 1969:187. Lapsus. Figure 2. Adult female Sceloporus poinsettii axtelli (UTEP S.[celoporus] poinssetti: Méndez-De la Cruz and Gu- 11510) from Alamo Mountain (Cornudas Mountains), tiérrez-Mayén 1991:2. Lapsus. Otero County, New Mexico (photo by author). Scelophorus poinsettii: Cloud, Mallouf, Mercado-Al- linger, Hoyt, Kenmotsu, Sanchez, and Madrid 1994:119. Lapsus. Sceloporus poinsetti aureolus: Auth, Smith, Brown, and Lintz 2000:72.
    [Show full text]
  • Spot-Tailed Earless Lizard Update: January 2017
    Spot-Tailed Earless Lizard Update: January 2017 Travis LaDuc Roel Lopez UT Austin Texas A&M Brad Wolaver Wade Ryberg UT Austin Texas A&M Mike Duran Toby Hibbitts The Nature Conservancy Texas A&M Ben Labay Matt Fujita UT Austin UT Arlington Jon Paul Pierre Corey Roelke UT Austin UT Arlington Ian Wright UT Austin Gautam Surya UT Austin Cody Shank UT Austin Photo by Mike Duran Thursday, January 26, 2017 Goals and Agenda Update of scien7fic progress since Sept. 2016 Discussion of ongoing research Findings So Far 1. Field data update for 2016 2. Insect survey update 3. Gene7cs status 4. Habitat modeling 1. Status 2. Road bias 3. Ground-truthing + possible addi7onal research… Study Area 2015 Surveys • April 22 – Sept 24 • 274 surveys in 57 counes • 18 coun7es with posive H. lacerata surveys • 174 H. lacerata observed 2016 Surveys • April 6 – Sept 28 • 171 surveys in 28 counes • 53 surveys in 7 coun7es with posive H. lacerata surveys • 170 H. lacerata observed • 91 animals marked; 2 recaptures 2016 Surveys • 171 surveys (April 6 – August 26) • 52 walking; 18 lizards seen (0.04 lizards/hr) • 119 driving; 152 lizards seen (0.30 lizards/hr) • 28 counes across historical range • Areas of 2015 sigh7ngs • Historical range where no 2015 sigh7ngs • 170 Holbrookia lacerata sighted • No new coun7es with H. lacerata from 2015 (save Suon Co.) • Juveniles observed in every unit 2016 Surveys • Mark-recapture: • 91 individuals iden7fied (all photographed, 61 toe-clipped) • Two recaptures • Combinaon road and walking surveys Diet / Insect Surveys Diet data obtained
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of a Subset of Historically Known Populations of The
    Section 6 (Texas Traditional) Report Review Form emailed to FWS S6 coordinator (mm/dd/yyyy): 9/11/2017 TPWD signature date on report: 8/31/2017 Project Title: To provide more evidence for the presence/absence of the southern spot-tailed earless lizard (Holbrookia lacerata subcaudalis; STEL) in southern Texas. Final or Interim Report? Final Grant #: TX-E-165-R Reviewer Station: Austin ESFO Lead station concurs with the following comments: NA (reviewer from lead station) Interim Report (check one): Final Report (check one): Acceptable (no comments) Acceptable (no comments) Needs revision prior to final report (see Needs revision (see comments below) comments below) Incomplete (see comments below) Incomplete (see comments below) Comments: FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. TX E-165-R (F14AP00824) Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation An Inventory of a Subset of Historically Known Populations of the Spot-tailed Earless Lizard (Holbrookia lacerata) Prepared by: Mike Duran Carter Smith Executive Director Clayton Wolf Director, Wildlife 31 August 2017 Final Report TPWD Contract #458178—31 August 2017 FINAL REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___ TX E-165-R-1__ GRANT TITLE: An Inventory of a Subset of Historically Known Populations of the Spot-tailed Earless Lizard (Holbrookia lacerata). REPORTING PERIOD: ____1 September 2014 to 31 August 2017 OBJECTIVE(S). To provide more evidence for the presence/absence of the southern spot-tailed earless lizard (Holbrookia lacerata subcaudalis; STEL) in southern Texas. Segment Objectives: Task 1. March 1 – June 30, 2015 – Spring surveys. Task 2. September 15 – October 31, 2015 – Fall surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding
    SCIENTIFIC AND STANDARD ENGLISH NAMES OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES OF NORTH AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO, WITH COMMENTS REGARDING CONFIDENCE IN OUR UNDERSTANDING SIXTH EDITON COMMITTEE ON STANDARD ENGLISH AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES BRIAN I. CROTHER (Committee Chair) STANDARD ENGLISH AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES COMMITTEE Jeff Boundy, Frank T. Burbrink, Jonathan A. Campbell, Brian I. Crother, Kevin de Queiroz, Darrel R. Frost, Richard Highton, John B. Iverson, Fred Kraus, Roy W. McDiarmid, Joseph R. Mendelson III, Peter A. Meylan, Tod W. Reeder, Michael E. Seidel, Stephen G. Tilley, David B. Wake Official Names List of American Society of Ichythologists and Herpetologists Herpetologists League Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 2008 SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES HERPETOLOGICAL CIRCULAR NO. 37 Published January 2008 © 2008 Society for the Study of Ampibians and Reptiles John J. Moriarty, Editor 3261 Victoria Street Shoreview, MN 55126 USA [email protected] Single copies of this circular are available from the Publications Secretary, Breck Bartholomew, P.O. Box 58517, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158–0517, USA. Telephone and fax: (801) 562-2660. E-mail: [email protected]. A list of other Society publications, including Facsimile Reprints in Herpetology, Herpetologi- cal Conservation, Contributions to Herpetology, and the Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles, will be sent on request or can be found at the end of this circular. Membership in the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles includes subscription to the Society’s technical Journal of Herpetology and new-journal Herpetological Review. Currently, Regular dues are $60.00 ($30.00 for students), Plenary $80.00 (includes JH, HR, and CAAR), and Institutional sub- scriptions are $115.00.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Comp Neurol
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Comp Neurol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 October 01. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: J Comp Neurol. 2013 October 1; 521(14): . doi:10.1002/cne.23351. Characterization of the Trunk Neural Crest in the bamboo shark, Chiloscyllium punctatum Marilyn Juarez*, Michelle Reyes*, Tiffany Coleman*, Lisa Rotenstein, Sothy Sao, Darwin Martinez, Matthew Jones#, Rachel Mackelprang, and Maria Elena de Bellard California State University Northridge. Biology Dept., MC 8303. 18111 Nordhoff Street. Northridge, CA 91330. # California Institute of Technology. Division of Biology, 139-74. 1200 East California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125. Abstract The neural crest is a population of mesenchymal cells that after migrating from the neural tube give rise to a structures and cell-types: jaw, part of the peripheral ganglia and melanocytes. Although much is known about neural crest development in jawed vertebrates, a clear picture of trunk neural crest development for elasmobranchs is yet to be developed. Here we present a detailed study of trunk neural crest development in the bamboo shark, Chiloscyllium punctatum. Vital labeling with DiI and in situ hybridization using cloned Sox8 and Sox9 probes demonstrated that trunk neural crest cells follow a pattern similar to the migratory paths already described in zebrafish and amphibians. We found shark trunk neural crest along the rostral side of the somites, the ventromedial pathway, branchial arches, gut, sensory ganglia and nerves. Interestingly, Chiloscyllium punctatum Sox8 and Sox9 sequences aligned with vertebrate SoxE genes, but appeared to be more ancient than the corresponding vertebrate paralogs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 14 Number 3 – Number 4 Article 1 12-30-1954 The taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera Andrew H. Barnum Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Barnum, Andrew H. (1954) "The taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 14 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol14/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. IMUS.COMP.ZSOL iU6 1 195^ The Great Basin Naturalist harvard Published by the HWIilIijM i Department of Zoology and Entomology Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Volum e XIV DECEMBER 30, 1954 Nos. 3 & 4 THE TAXONOMY OF UTAH ORTHOPTERA^ ANDREW H. BARNUM- Grand Junction, Colorado INTRODUCTION During the years of 1950 to 1952 a study of the taxonomy and distribution of the Utah Orthoptera was made at the Brigham Young University by the author under the direction of Dr. Vasco M. Tan- ner. This resulted in a listing of the species found in the State. Taxonomic keys were made and compiled covering these species. Distributional notes where available were made with the brief des- criptions of the species. The work was based on the material in the entomological col- lection of the Brigham Young University, with additional records obtained from the collection of the Utah State Agricultural College.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release Albuquerque, NM 87103 505/248-6911 505/248-6915 (Fax)
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Public Affairs Office PO Box 1306 News Release Albuquerque, NM 87103 505/248-6911 505/248-6915 (Fax) Southwest Region (Arizona ● New Mexico ● Oklahoma ●Texas) www.fws.gov/southwest/ For Release: May 23, 2011 Contacts: Alisa Shull, (512) 490-0057 Lesli Gray, (972) 569-8588 THE SPOT-TAILED EARLESS LIZARD MAY WARRANT PROTECTION UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT The spot-tailed earless lizard (Holbrookia lacerata) may warrant federal protection as a threatened or endangered species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announced today, following an initial review of a petition seeking to protect the spot-tailed earless lizard under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Service finds that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the spot-tailed earless lizard may be warranted. This finding is based on potential threats posed by predation from fire ants. Fire ants are known to adversely impact native fauna in general, including reptiles. Fire ants occur across a large part of the spot-tailed earless lizard’s range and may pose a threat through direct predation on adults, hatchlings and eggs. The spot-tailed earless lizard is divided into two distinct subspecies, based on morphological (physical) differences and geographic separation. The northern spot-tailed earless lizard subspecies (Holbrookia lacerata lacerata) historically occurred throughout the Edwards Plateau in Texas. The southern spot-tailed earless lizard (Holbrookia lacerata subcaudalis) historically occurred through south Texas into parts of Mexico’s States of Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas. The present population of the spot-tailed earless lizard’s population status is largely unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera, Acrididae, Oedipodinae) Reveal Convergence of Wing Morphology
    Zoologica Scripta Phylogenetic analyses of band-winged grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Oedipodinae) reveal convergence of wing morphology MARTIN HUSEMANN,SUK NAMKUNG,JAN C. HABEL,PATRICK D. DANLEY &AXEL HOCHKIRCH Submitted: 17 September 2011 Husemann, M., Namkung, S., Habel, J.C., Danley, P.D. & Hochkirch, A. (2012). Accepted: 10 April 2012 Phylogenetic analyses of band-winged grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Oedipodinae) doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00548.x reveal convergence of wing morphology. —Zoologica Scripta, 41, 515–526. Historically, morphological traits have been used to examine the relationships of distantly related taxa with global distributions. The use of such traits, however, may be misleading and may not provide the resolution needed to distinguish various hypotheses that may explain the distribution patterns of widely distributed taxa. One such taxon, the Oedipo- dine grasshoppers, contains two tribes principally defined by wing morphologies: the Bry- odemini have broad wings whereas Sphingonotini are narrow-winged. Through the use of morphological features alone, hypotheses concerning the evolution of these tribes cannot be distinguished. To differentiate hypotheses that may explain the distribution of Oedipo- dines, such as vicariance, natural dispersal and anthropogenic translocation, we used two mitochondrial and three nuclear gene fragments to reconstruct the phylogenetic relation- ships within and between the two tribes, and employed a molecular clock to evaluate the hypotheses of vicariance and dispersal. Our results clearly reject monophyly of the tribes and revealed monophyletic Old and New World clades, which is in agreement with previ- ous molecular studies. The split between both clades was dated at 35 Ma (±12 Ma). This clearly rejects the vicariance hypothesis and supports a single invasion via the Beringian land bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Checklist of the Orthopteroid Insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea,Orthoptera) of Texas
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2001 Preliminary checklist of the orthopteroid insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea,Orthoptera) of Texas John A. Stidham Garland, TX Thomas A. Stidham University of California, Berkeley, CA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Stidham, John A. and Stidham, Thomas A., "Preliminary checklist of the orthopteroid insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea,Orthoptera) of Texas" (2001). Insecta Mundi. 180. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/180 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 15, No. 1, March, 2001 35 Preliminary checklist of the orthopteroid insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea,Orthoptera) of Texas John A. Stidham 301 Pebble Creek Dr., Garland, TX 75040 and Thomas A. Stidham Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Paleontology, and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, Abstract: Texas has one of the most diverse orthopteroid assemblages of any state in the United States, reflecting the varied habitats found in the state. Three hundred and eighty-nine species and 78 subspecies of orthopteroid insects (Blattodea, Mantodea, Phasmatodea, and Orthoptera) have published records for the state of Texas. This is the first such comprehensive checklist for Texas and should aid future work on these groups in this area. Introduction (Flook and Rowell, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Endoparasites Infecting Two Species of Whiptail Lizard (<I
    SHORT NOTES SHORT NOTES 1980; Ribas et al., 1995; 1998; Vrcibradic et al., 2000; Menezes et al., 2004). In this study we survey the en- doparasite faunas of two sympatric species of whiptail HERPETOLOGICAL JOURNAL, Vol. 15, pp. 133-137 (2005) lizards from Brazil, Cnemidophorus abaetensis Dias, ENDOPARASITES INFECTING TWO Rocha & Vrcibradic, 2002 and Cnemidophorus ocellifer (Spix, 1824). Cnemidophorus abaetensis is a recently SPECIES OF WHIPTAIL LIZARD described species whose geographic distribution is ap- (CNEMIDOPHORUS ABAETENSIS AND parently restricted to the northern coast of Bahia state C. OCELLIFER; TEIIDAE) IN A (Dias et al., 2002), whereas C. ocellifer is widespread in ‘RESTINGA’ HABITAT OF NORTH- South America south of the Amazonian region, from EASTERN BRAZIL north-eastern and central Brazil to Paraguay, Bolivia and northern Argentina (Vanzolini et al., 1980; Cei, EDUARDO JOSÉ R. DIAS, DAVOR VRCIBRADIC 1993). So far, nothing has been published about the AND CARLOS FREDERICO D. ROCHA endoparasites associated with these two species [in the study of Ribas et al., (1995) regarding nematodes of C. Setor de Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do ocellifer, the species under treatment is actually C. Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier littoralis Rocha, Araújo, Vrcibradic & Costa, 2000, 524, 20550-011, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil which had not yet been formally described at the time We analysed the endoparasite fauna associated with (see Rocha et al., 2000a)]. two species of whiptail lizard (Cnemidophorus A total of 73 lizards (33 C. abaetensis and 40 C. abaetensis and C. ocellifer) from north-eastern Brazil. ocellifer) were collected by the first author with the aid Overall parasite prevalence was relatively low for both of elastic rubber bands at the coastal sand-dune species (18.2% in C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sprint Performance of Phrynosomatid Lizards, Measured on a High-Speed Treadmill, Correlates with Hindlimb Length
    J. Zool., Lond. (1999) 248, 255±265 # 1999 The Zoological Society of London Printed in the United Kingdom Sprint performance of phrynosomatid lizards, measured on a high-speed treadmill, correlates with hindlimb length Kevin E. Bonine and Theodore Garland, Jr Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1381, U.S.A. (Accepted 19 September 1998) Abstract We measured sprint performance of phrynosomatid lizards and selected outgroups (n = 27 species). Maximal sprint running speeds were obtained with a new measurement technique, a high-speed treadmill (H.S.T.). Animals were measured at their approximate ®eld-active body temperatures once on both of 2 consecutive days. Within species, individual variation in speed measurements was consistent between trial days and repeatabilities were similar to values reported previously for photocell-timed racetrack measure- ments. Multiple regression with phylogenetically independent contrasts indicates that interspeci®c variation in maximal speed is positively correlated with hindlimb span, but not signi®cantly related to either body mass or body temperature. Among the three phrynosomatid subclades, sand lizards (Uma, Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, Holbrookia) have the highest sprint speeds and longest hindlimbs, horned lizards (Phryno- soma) exhibit the lowest speeds and shortest limbs, and the Sceloporus group (including Uta and Urosaurus) is intermediate in both speed and hindlimb span. Key words: comparative method, lizard, locomotion, morphometrics, phrynosomatidae, sprint speed INTRODUCTION Fig. 1; Montanucci, 1987; de Queiroz, 1992; Wiens & Reeder, 1997) that exhibit large variation in locomotor Evolutionary physiologists and functional morpholo- morphology and performance, behaviour, and ecology gists emphasize the importance of direct measurements (Stebbins, 1985; Conant & Collins, 1991; Garland, 1994; of whole-animal performance (Arnold, 1983; Garland & Miles, 1994a).
    [Show full text]