Obligate Army-Ant-Following Birds: a Study of Ecology,Spatial Movement Patterns, and Behavior in Amazonian Peru

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Obligate Army-Ant-Following Birds: a Study of Ecology,Spatial Movement Patterns, and Behavior in Amazonian Peru Ornithological Monographs No. 55 Obligate Army-ant-following Birds: A Study of Ecology,Spatial Movement Patterns, and Behavior in Amazonian Peru SUSAN K. WILLSON PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION OBLIGATE ARMY-ANT-FOLLOWING BIRDS: A STUDY OF ECOLOGY, SPATIAL MOVEMENT PATTERNS, AND BEHAVIOR IN AMAZONIAN PERU ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Editor:John Faaborg 224 Tucker Hall Division of BiologicalSciences Universityof Missouri Columbia, Missouri 65211 ManagingEditor: Bradley R. Plummer Proof Editors: Mark C. Penrose, Richard D. Earles AOU Publications Office 622 ScienceEngineering Departmentof BiologicalSciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville,Arkansas 72701 The OrnithologicalMonographs series, published by the American Ornithologists' Union,has been established for majorpapers too long for inclusionin the Union'sjournal, The Auk. Copiesof OrnithologicalMonographs are availablefrom ButeoBooks, 3130 Laurel Road, Shipman,VA 22971. Price of OrnithologicalMonographs no. 55:$10.00 ($9.00 for AOU members).Add $4.00for handlingand shippingcharges in U.S., and $5.00for shipping to other countries.Make checkspayable to ButeoBooks. Author of this issue, Susan K. Willson. Library of CongressControl Number 2004105806 Printedby CadmusCommunications, Ephrata, PA 17522 Issued5 May 2004 OrnithologicalMonographs, No. 55 x + 67 pp. Copyright¸ by the AmericanOrnithologists' Union, 2004 ISBN: 0-943610-60-5 Cover: Assemblage of ant-following birds: (1) Dendrocinclamerula, (2) Rhegmatorhinamelanosticta, (3) Phlegopsisnigromaculata, (4) Myrmecizafortis, and (5) Gymnopithyssalvini. (Ink sketchby KirstenCarlson.) OBLIGATE ARMY-ANT-FOLLOWING BIRDS: A STUDY OF ECOLOGY, SPATIAL MOVEMENT PATTERNS, AND BEHAVIOR IN AMAZONIAN PERU BY SUSAN K. WILLSON Divisionof BiologicalSciences, University of Missouri, 105 Tucker Hall, Columbia,Missouri 65211, USA ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 55 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Listsof Tablesand Figures ................................................. vii ABSTRACT ............................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 3 2. BACKGROUND: SOME NATURAL HISTORY OF THE BIRDS AND ARMY ANTS 5 THE BIRDS ............................................................. 5 THE ARMY ANTS ......................................................... 8 THE STUDY SITE ........................................................ 10 3. RESOURCE USE AND SPECIES COEXISTENCE IN FIVE OBLIGATE ANT-FOLLOWING BIRD SPECIES ................................... 11 METHODS ............................................................. 12 FIELD METHODS ....................................................... 12 STATISTICAL METHODS .................................................. 14 METHODSFOR SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ....................................... 14 RESULTS .............................................................. 18 ARMY ANT COLONY DENSITY ............................................ 18 ADULT AVlAN POPULATION DENSITIES ..................................... 18 DOMINANCE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BIRD SPECIES ........................... ][8 AVIAN HOME-V•NGE SIZE ............................................... ][9 DISCUSSION ........................................................... 20 ECOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BIRD SPECIES ........................... 20 AVIAN HOME RANGES AND POPULATIONS ..................................... 29 SEASONALITY AND MOVEMENT PATTERNS ................................... 31 CONCLUSION .......................................................... 32 CONSERVATION CONCERNS .............................................. 32 4. SURVIVAL RATES AND POPULATION DYNAMICS IN OBLIGATE ARMY ANT FOLLOWERS .......................................... 35 METHODS ............................................................. 36 SURVIVAL ESTIMATES ................................................... 36 RESULTS .............................................................. 37 SURVIVAL AND RECRUITMENT RATES ....................................... 37 POPULATION DYNAMICS AND TERRITORIALITY ............................... 41 Discussion ........................................................... 41 5. NESTING AND REPRODUCTION IN A GUILD OF OBLIGATE ARMY ANT FOLLOWERS IN AMAZONIAN PERU .................... 45 RESULTS .............................................................. 45 GYMNOPITHYS SALVINI ..................................................... 45 RHEGMATORHINA MELANOSTICTA .......................................... 47 PHLEGOPSISNIGROMACULATA ............................................... 49 DENDROCINCLA MERULA ................................................... 50 DISCUSSION ........................................................... 51 6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE QUESTIONS ............................... 55 SUMMARY OF COEXISTENCE PATTERNS ....................................... 55 FUTUREQUESTIONS ..................................................... 56 CONSERVATIONAPPLICATIONS ............................................. 58 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................... 59 LITERATURE CITED ...................................................... 61 APPENDIX .............................................................. 67 LIST OF TABLES 2.1. Morphologicalmeasurements of five bird species ........................... 6 3.1. Colony densitymeasurements of army ant Ecitonburchelli ................... 18 3.2. Densityestimates for abovegroundforaging swarms of army ant Labidus praedator.......................................................... 19 3.3. Adult populationdensities and relative abundancesof five bird speciesover threeyears ......................................... 19 3.4. Rate-of-displacementmatrix for five bird species........................... 20 3.5. Mean home-rangesizes of five bird species................................ 20 3.6. Estimatednumber of Ecitonburchelli and Labiduspraedator swarms on an average bird species'home range, and percentageof time Ecitonburchelli colonies would not be available .............................................. 23 3.7. Frequencyand relativeuse of Ecitonburchelli and Labiduspraedator swarms by individually radiotrackedbirds ...................................... 23 3.8. Relativeuse of eachant speciesby five bird species......................... 24 3.9. Mean displacementrate per minute per individual bird; results for Ecitonburchelli and Labiduspraedator swarms over threeyears .......... 25 3.10.Displacement rate with 95% confidenceintervals at Ecitonburchelli swarms ... 25 3.11.Displacements per minuteper bird for threeyears, grouped by birds per meter of antswarmfront .................................... 25 3.12.Predictions and resultsof four hypothesesregarding avian use of spacealong Ecitonburchelli swarm fronts ............................ 27 3.13. Avian use of total foraging spaceavailable at Ecitonburchelli and Labiduspraedator swarms over threeyears .......................... 28 3.14.Comparison of home-rangeand populationestimates for five bird speciesbetween work presentedhere and a 1990study at the samesite .... 31 4.1.Adultsurvival estimatesfor four of the five bird species..................... 38 4.2. Recruitmentestimates over two breedingseasons for five bird species......... 40 5.1. Nest charactersfor threeof the five bird species............................ 46 5.2. Measurementsof nestlingbirds for threeof the five bird species.............. 47 5.3. Nestingdates and nestoutcomes for three of the five bird species ............ 48 5.4. Mate switchingin pairsof obligateant-following birds ...................... 53 6.1. Summaryof key ecologicaland behavioraldifferences amongfive bird species............................................. 56 LIST OF FIGURES 2.1. Ecitonburchelli army ant bivouac.......................................... 9 3.1. Probabilityof an Ecitonburchelli colony foraging, given the number of colonies in an area ........................................ 16 3.2.Mean adulthome-range size per yearfor five bird speciesfor threeyears ...... 21 3.3. Estimatedmeters of antswarmfront utilized by eachof the five bird speciesin 1998and 2000-2001 ................................... 26 3.4. Precipitationby monthat CochaCashu Biological Station, southeasternPeru, from 1998through 2001 ............................ 32 3.5. Use of Ecitonburchelli and Labiduspraedator swarms by five bird species ....... 33 4.1. Recruitmentrate per 100ha per year for five bird species.................... 40 4.2. Estimatedadults per 100ha for five bird species,over threeyears ............. 41 4.3. Selectedhome-range areas of Gymnopithyssalvini, Phlegopsis nigromaculata,and Myrmecizafortis,2000-2001 field season............... 42 5.1. Gymnopithyssalvini nest with two eggsin low stump ........................ 47 5.2. Rhegmatorhinamelanosticta nest with two eggsin leaf-sheath cavity of live palm ................................................. 49 5.3. Phlegopsisnigromaculata nestlings with larval botflies........................ 51 APPENDIX Map of the trail systemat CochaCashu Biological Station, Peru .................. 67 From the Editor This is the secondOrnithological Monograph distributed to all membersof the American Ornithologists'Union. Whereas Ornithological Monograph No. 54 narrowlyfocused on the demogra- phy of a singlespecies, with contributionsfrom multipleco-authors, this monograph by SusanK. Willson attemptsto describethe ecologicalinteractions
Recommended publications
  • Wings Without Borders Alas Sin Fronteras IV North American Ornithological Conference IV Congreso Norteamericano De Ornitología
    Wings Without Borders Alas Sin Fronteras IV North American Ornithological Conference IV Congreso Norteamericano de Ornitología October 3-7, 2006 · 3-7 Octubre 2006 Veracruz, México CONFERENCE PROGRAM PROGRAMA DEL CONGRESO IV NAOC is organized jointly by the American Ornithologists’ Union, Association of Field Ornithologists, Sección Mexicana de Consejo Internacional para la Preservación de las Aves, A. C., Cooper Ornithological Society, Raptor Research Foundation, Society of Canadian Ornithologists / Société des Ornithologistes du Canada, Waterbird Society, and Wilson Ornithological Society 4to. Congreso Norteamericano de Ornitología - Alas Sin Fronteras Programa del Congreso Table of Contents IV NAOC Conference Committees ......................................................................................................................................................................................2 Local Hosts ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Conference Sponsors .............................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Other Sponsors ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Colombia Mega II 1St – 30Th November 2016 (30 Days) Trip Report
    Colombia Mega II 1st – 30th November 2016 (30 Days) Trip Report Black Manakin by Trevor Ellery Trip Report compiled by tour leader: Trevor Ellery Trip Report – RBL Colombia - Mega II 2016 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________ Top ten birds of the trip as voted for by the Participants: 1. Ocellated Tapaculo 6. Blue-and-yellow Macaw 2. Rainbow-bearded Thornbill 7. Red-ruffed Fruitcrow 3. Multicolored Tanager 8. Sungrebe 4. Fiery Topaz 9. Buffy Helmetcrest 5. Sword-billed Hummingbird 10. White-capped Dipper Tour Summary This was one again a fantastic trip across the length and breadth of the world’s birdiest nation. Highlights were many and included everything from the flashy Fiery Topazes and Guianan Cock-of- the-Rocks of the Mitu lowlands to the spectacular Rainbow-bearded Thornbills and Buffy Helmetcrests of the windswept highlands. In between, we visited just about every type of habitat that it is possible to bird in Colombia and shared many special moments: the diminutive Lanceolated Monklet that perched above us as we sheltered from the rain at the Piha Reserve, the showy Ochre-breasted Antpitta we stumbled across at an antswarm at Las Tangaras Reserve, the Ocellated Tapaculo (voted bird of the trip) that paraded in front of us at Rio Blanco, and the male Vermilion Cardinal, in all his crimson glory, that we enjoyed in the Guajira desert on the final morning of the trip. If you like seeing lots of birds, lots of specialities, lots of endemics and enjoy birding in some of the most stunning scenery on earth, then this trip is pretty unbeatable.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Surveys in Serranía De Los Churumbelos, Southern Colombia
    Ornithological surveys in Serranía de los Churumbelos, southern Colombia Paul G. W . Salaman, Thomas M. Donegan and Andrés M. Cuervo Cotinga 12 (1999): 29– 39 En el marco de dos expediciones biológicos y Anglo-Colombian conservation expeditions — ‘Co­ conservacionistas anglo-colombianas multi-taxa, s lombia ‘98’ and the ‘Colombian EBA Project’. Seven llevaron a cabo relevamientos de aves en lo Serranía study sites were investigated using non-systematic de los Churumbelos, Cauca, en julio-agosto 1988, y observations and standardised mist-netting tech­ julio 1999. Se estudiaron siete sitios enter en 350 y niques by the three authors, with Dan Davison and 2500 m, con 421 especes registrados. Presentamos Liliana Dávalos in 1998. Each study site was situ­ un resumen de los especes raros para cada sitio, ated along an altitudinal transect at c. 300- incluyendo los nuevos registros de distribución más m elevational steps, from 350–2500 m on the Ama­ significativos. Los resultados estabilicen firme lo zonian slope of the Serranía. Our principal aim was prioridad conservacionista de lo Serranía de los to allow comparisons to be made between sites and Churumbelos, y aluco nos encontramos trabajando with other biological groups (mammals, herptiles, junto a los autoridades ambientales locales con insects and plants), and, incorporating geographi­ cuiras a lo protección del marcizo. cal and anthropological information, to produce a conservation assessment of the region (full results M e th o d s in Salaman et al.4). A sizeable part of eastern During 14 July–17 August 1998 and 3–22 July 1999, Cauca — the Bota Caucana — including the 80-km- ornithological surveys were undertaken in Serranía long Serranía de los Churumbelos had never been de los Churumbelos, Department of Cauca, by two subject to faunal surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Predation on Vertebrates by Neotropical Passerine Birds Leonardo E
    Lundiana 6(1):57-66, 2005 © 2005 Instituto de Ciências Biológicas - UFMG ISSN 1676-6180 Predation on vertebrates by Neotropical passerine birds Leonardo E. Lopes1,2, Alexandre M. Fernandes1,3 & Miguel Â. Marini1,4 1 Depto. de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 31270-910, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 2 Current address: Lab. de Ornitologia, Depto. de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, 31270-910, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]. 3 Current address: Coleções Zoológicas, Aves, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida André Araújo, 2936, INPA II, 69083-000, Manaus, AM, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]. 4 Current address: Lab. de Ornitologia, Depto. de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-900, Brasília, DF, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We investigated if passerine birds act as important predators of small vertebrates within the Neotropics. We surveyed published studies on bird diets, and information on labels of museum specimens, compiling data on the contents of 5,221 stomachs. Eighteen samples (0.3%) presented evidence of predation on vertebrates. Our bibliographic survey also provided records of 203 passerine species preying upon vertebrates, mainly frogs and lizards. Our data suggest that vertebrate predation by passerines is relatively uncommon in the Neotropics and not characteristic of any family. On the other hand, although rare, the ability to prey on vertebrates seems to be widely distributed among Neotropical passerines, which may respond opportunistically to the stimulus of a potential food item.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil's Eastern Amazonia
    The loud and impressive White Bellbird, one of the many highlights on the Brazil’s Eastern Amazonia 2017 tour (Eduardo Patrial) BRAZIL’S EASTERN AMAZONIA 8/16 – 26 AUGUST 2017 LEADER: EDUARDO PATRIAL This second edition of Brazil’s Eastern Amazonia was absolutely a phenomenal trip with over five hundred species recorded (514). Some adjustments happily facilitated the logistics (internal flights) a bit and we also could explore some areas around Belem this time, providing some extra good birds to our list. Our time at Amazonia National Park was good and we managed to get most of the important targets, despite the quite low bird activity noticed along the trails when we were there. Carajas National Forest on the other hand was very busy and produced an overwhelming cast of fine birds (and a Giant Armadillo!). Caxias in the end came again as good as it gets, and this time with the novelty of visiting a new site, Campo Maior, a place that reminds the lowlands from Pantanal. On this amazing tour we had the chance to enjoy the special avifauna from two important interfluvium in the Brazilian Amazon, the Madeira – Tapajos and Xingu – Tocantins; and also the specialties from a poorly covered corner in the Northeast region at Maranhão and Piauí states. Check out below the highlights from this successful adventure: Horned Screamer, Masked Duck, Chestnut- headed and Buff-browed Chachalacas, White-crested Guan, Bare-faced Curassow, King Vulture, Black-and- white and Ornate Hawk-Eagles, White and White-browed Hawks, Rufous-sided and Russet-crowned Crakes, Dark-winged Trumpeter (ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Wing-Banded Antbird, Myrmornis Torquata Myrmornithinae
    Thamnophilidae: Antbirds, Species Tree I Northern Wing-banded Antbird, Myrmornis stictoptera ⋆Southern Wing-banded Antbird, Myrmornis torquata ⋆ Myrmornithinae Spot-winged Antshrike, Pygiptila stellaris Russet Antshrike, Thamnistes anabatinus Rufescent Antshrike, Thamnistes rufescens Guianan Rufous-rumped Antwren, Euchrepomis guianensus ⋆Western Rufous-rumped Antwren, Euchrepomis callinota Euchrepomidinae Yellow-rumped Antwren, Euchrepomis sharpei Ash-winged Antwren, Euchrepomis spodioptila Chestnut-shouldered Antwren, Euchrepomis humeralis ⋆Stripe-backed Antbird, Myrmorchilus strigilatus ⋆Dot-winged Antwren, Microrhopias quixensis ⋆Yapacana Antbird, Aprositornis disjuncta ⋆Black-throated Antbird, Myrmophylax atrothorax ⋆Gray-bellied Antbird, Ammonastes pelzelni MICRORHOPIINI ⋆Recurve-billed Bushbird, Neoctantes alixii ⋆Black Bushbird, Neoctantes niger Rondonia Bushbird, Neoctantes atrogularis Checker-throated Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla fulviventris Western Ornate Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla ornata Eastern Ornate Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla hoffmannsi Rufous-tailed Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla erythrura White-eyed Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla leucophthalma Brown-bellied Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla gutturalis Foothill Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla spodionota Madeira Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla amazonica Roosevelt Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla dentei Negro Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla pyrrhonota Brown-backed Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla fjeldsaai ⋆Napo Stipplethroat, Epinecrophylla haematonota ⋆Streak-capped Antwren, Terenura
    [Show full text]
  • Juina Et Al 814.Fm
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 20: 305–310, 2009 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society DESCRIPTION OF THE NEST AND PARENTAL CARE OF THE CHESTNUT-NAPED ANTPITTA (GRALLARIA NUCHALIS) FROM SOUTHERN ECUADOR Mery E. Juiña J.1, J. Berton C. Harris1,2, & Harold F. Greeney3 1Fundación de Conservación Jocotoco, Ave. Los Shyris N37–146 y El Comercio, Quito, Ecuador. 2Environment Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Yanayacu Biological Station and Center for Creative Studies c/o Foch 721 y Amazonas, Quito, Ecuador. Descripción del nido y cuidado parental de la Gralaria Nuquicastaña (Grallaria nuchalis) del sur del Ecuador. Key words: Nest, nestling, Chestnut-naped Antpitta, Grallaria nuchalis, Ecuador, bamboo, Andes. The Chestnut-naped Antpitta (Grallaria nucha- Colombia (ssp. ruficeps), but provides no infor- lis; Fig. 1) is among the largest of the ground- mation on the nest. Here we provide the first antbirds (Grallariidae sensu Remsen et al. description of the nest, nest location, and 2008). Locally fairly common, it is frequently parental care of G. n. nuchalis from southeast- associated with stands of Chusquea sp. bam- ern Ecuador. boo in montane forest on both slopes of the Andes from southern Colombia to northern Chronology and study area. On 11 November Peru (Ridgely & Tudor 1994, Krabbe & Schu- 2006, MEJJ located a Chestnut-naped Ant- lenberg 2003). In Ecuador, nominate ssp. pitta nest with two young nestlings at 2500 m nuchalis is found on the east slope of the a.s.l. in the Tapichalaca Biological Reserve Andes mostly from 2000–3000 m a.s.l., while (4°29’S, 79°07’W) in Zamora-Chinchipe ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Behavior of Plain-Brown Woodcreepers, Dendrocincla Fuliginosa
    THE BEHAVIOR OF PLAIN-BROWN WOODCREEPERS, DENDROCINCLA FULIGINOSA EDWIN 0. WILLIS N forests of tropical America, woodcreepers of the genus Dendrocincla I follow swarms of army ants persistently (Willis, 1960:158-159; Skutch, 1969:136; Oniki and Willis, 1972). Intensive studies of ant-following birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama Canal Zone, and brief studies in other areas show that Plain-brown Woodcreepers regularly follow army ants. The changes in foraging niche when these woodcreepers confront different sets of competing antbirds at some of the localities have been detailed elsewhere (Willis, 1966). Here social and individual behavior will be considered. Feduccia (197O:I) lists many brief references, mostly in annotated lists, on the behavior of woodcreepers. The only extensive studies have been Skutchs’ (1969) of Tawny-winged and other woodcreepers. Slud (1960, 1964) and several others, including Johnson (1954) and Snow and Snow (1964) and Oniki (1970) among references not listed by Feduccia, have commented briefly on the natural history of Plain-brown Woodcreepers. The species and its genus and family are not well known ethologically. Appendix 1 lists common and scientific names of birds mentioned herein, following Meyer de Schauensee (1970)) except for Central American birds listed only in Eisenmann (1955) and for northern birds listed in the A.O.U. Check-list. THE PLAIN-BROWN WOODCREEPERS Plain-brown Woodcreepers wait on or hitch up the trunks of trees like slender woodpeckers or overgrown Brown Creepers. They live in the middle and lower levels of humid lowland forests from Honduras to central Brasil. Occasionally they wander to the edge of the forest, into cacao and coffee orchards, or into second growth more than 5 m tall.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Amazon: Freshwater Connectivity and Ecosystem Health WWF LIVING AMAZON INITIATIVE SUGGESTED CITATION
    REPORT LIVING AMAZON 2015 State of the Amazon: Freshwater Connectivity and Ecosystem Health WWF LIVING AMAZON INITIATIVE SUGGESTED CITATION Macedo, M. and L. Castello. 2015. State of the Amazon: Freshwater Connectivity and Ecosystem Health; edited by D. Oliveira, C. C. Maretti and S. Charity. Brasília, Brazil: WWF Living Amazon Initiative. 136pp. PUBLICATION INFORMATION State of the Amazon Series editors: Cláudio C. Maretti, Denise Oliveira and Sandra Charity. This publication State of the Amazon: Freshwater Connectivity and Ecosystem Health: Publication editors: Denise Oliveira, Cláudio C. Maretti, and Sandra Charity. Publication text editors: Sandra Charity and Denise Oliveira. Core Scientific Report (chapters 1-6): Written by Marcia Macedo and Leandro Castello; scientific assessment commissioned by WWF Living Amazon Initiative (LAI). State of the Amazon: Conclusions and Recommendations (chapter 7): Cláudio C. Maretti, Marcia Macedo, Leandro Castello, Sandra Charity, Denise Oliveira, André S. Dias, Tarsicio Granizo, Karen Lawrence WWF Living Amazon Integrated Approaches for a More Sustainable Development in the Pan-Amazon Freshwater Connectivity Cláudio C. Maretti; Sandra Charity; Denise Oliveira; Tarsicio Granizo; André S. Dias; and Karen Lawrence. Maps: Paul Lefebvre/Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC); Valderli Piontekwoski/Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM, Portuguese acronym); and Landscape Ecology Lab /WWF Brazil. Photos: Adriano Gambarini; André Bärtschi; Brent Stirton/Getty Images; Denise Oliveira; Edison Caetano; and Ecosystem Health Fernando Pelicice; Gleilson Miranda/Funai; Juvenal Pereira; Kevin Schafer/naturepl.com; María del Pilar Ramírez; Mark Sabaj Perez; Michel Roggo; Omar Rocha; Paulo Brando; Roger Leguen; Zig Koch. Front cover Mouth of the Teles Pires and Juruena rivers forming the Tapajós River, on the borders of Mato Grosso, Amazonas and Pará states, Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Rivers of the Amazon III: Mamirauá, Amanã, and Tefé 2019
    Field Guides Tour Report Great Rivers of the Amazon III: Mamirauá, Amanã, and Tefé 2019 Dec 2, 2019 to Dec 16, 2019 Bret Whitney & Micah Riegner For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. The White Uakari alone is a reason to visit this part of Amazonia. With its striking red face, purple eyeshadow and fluffy white fur, it's gotta be one of the most outlandish of all Neotropical primates. We had an amazing time watching a troop right above us at Mamiraua. Photo by Micah Riegner. Establishing a new tour in Amazonia where no birders go is always thrilling—you just never know what you’re going to find up the next igarape (creek), what the next feeding flock will bring, or night outing might yield. So, in perpetuating the Field Guides tradition of going to new exciting places, Bret and I visited Reserva Amana and FLONA Tefe back in June. These two enormous swaths of protected forest in the heart of Amazonia had never been visited by a tour group, so we had some ground-truthing to do before the tour. This involved spending hours in a voadeira (open-top metal boat with outboard motor) to reach the isolated communities within the reserves, meeting with the local people and explaining what bird-watching is all about and checking out the trails they had cleared in anticipation of our arrival. Our scouting was fruitful, and we are pleased to announce a successful first run of the tour! There were numerous highlights, from seeing between 1,500 and 2,000 Sand-colored Nighthawks dusting the treetops like snow at Amana to watching Margays almost getting into a cat fight in the canopy at Mamiraua and the band of White Uakaris with their intimidating red faces.
    [Show full text]
  • Cotinga-19-2003-72-8
    Cotinga 19 Neotropical Notebook Neotropical Notebook contains During a visit to Peralta, in the (Fig. 1). Measurements (in mm) three sections. The first consists of Ciénaga de Zapata, on 17 were: 36.5 × 25.4, 35.2 × 25.5, 35.4 short papers documenting records. November 2000, we found a nest of × 26.4, 36.6 × 26 and 37.2 × 26.5. Photos and descriptions are the species, the first to be Confirmation that the nest published where appropriate. The discovered in Cuba. It was located belonged to a Spotted Rail came second section summarises records just above the water level and was when one of the adults published elsewhere, following the attached to an Annona glabra (videotaped) came within 5 m of format established in previous (Annonaceae) bush, and consisted AK while he was measuring the issues of Cotinga. The third lists of a cup of weeds, with some dead eggs. It was very active, constantly unpublished and undocumented leaves in the rather shallow uttering its alarm call and moving records. Please indicate, with depression. The overall diameter around the nest. Incubation was submissions, in which section you was 23 cm and the nest was 9 cm estimated at 20 days; certainly by wish your records to appear. deep, while the internal cup 9 December the nest was empty, measured 8 cm. Nest material the young having apparently SHORT NOTES comprised 12 species of flowering departed. plants, most of them herbaceous— Annona glabra, Thalia trichocalyx Acknowledgements Description of the first nest of (Marantaceae), Conocarpus erectus Ramona Oviedo Prieto identified Spotted Rail Pardirallus (Combretaceae), Paspalum the nest materials, NBC and maculatus discovered in Cuba blodguettii (Poaceae), Sporobolus Birdquest provided financial Spotted Rail Pardirallus indicus (Poaceae), Chara sp.
    [Show full text]
  • First Nest Description for the Ocellated Antbird (Phaenostictus Mcleannani)
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 277 LITERATURE CITED Warbler (Dendroica cuerulescens), in an unfrag- mented temperate forest. Auk 109:321•333. BROCKELMAN, W. Y. 1998. Long term ecological re- KiTAMURA, S., T YUMOTO, P. POONSWAD, P. CHUAILUA, search plot for the study of animal diets in Khao K. PLONGMAI, T MARUHASHI, AND N. NOMA. 2002. Yai National Park. Pages 307•310 in The Asian Interactions between fleshy fruits and frugivores hornbills: ecology and conservation (P. Poonswad, in a seasonal forest in Thailand. Oecologia 133: Ed.). Thai Studies in Biodiversity, no. 2. Biodi- 559-572. versity Research and Training Program, Bangkok, LAMBERT, F R. AND N. J. COLLAR. 2002. The future Thailand. for Sundaic lowland forest birds: long-term effects FOGDEN, M. P. L. 1972. The seasonality and population of commercial logging and fragmentation. Fork- dynamics of equatorial forest birds in Sarawak. tail 18:127-146. Ibis 114:307-343. MAYFIELD, H. F 1961. Nesting success calculated from FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED exposure. Wilson Bulletin 73:255•261. NATIONS. 2003. State of the world's forests 2003. OGDEN, L. J. E. AND B. J. M. STUTCHBURY. 1996. Con- Food and Agricultural Organization of the United straints on double brooding in a Neotropical mi- Nations, Rome. Online at <http://www.fao.org/ grant, the Hooded Warbler Condor 98:736-744. DOCREP/005/Y7581 E/y7581 e 16.htm> (accessed ROBINSON, W. D., T R. ROBINSON, S. K. ROBINSON, AND 18 February 2004). J. D. BRAWN. 2000. Nesting success of understory HENSLER, G. L. 1985. Estimation and comparison of forest birds in central Panama.
    [Show full text]