DOCSLIB.ORG

Ministry of Tourism and Arts Department of National Parks & Wildlife Non Detrimental Findings Report for African Leopard Sport Hunting in Zambia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ministry of Tourism and Arts Department of National Parks & Wildlife Non Detrimental Findings Report for African Leopard Sport Hunting in Zambia AC30 Doc. 15 Annex 5 (English only / seulement en anglais / únicamente en inglés) MINISTRY OF TOURISM AND ARTS DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL PARKS & WILDLIFE NON DETRIMENTAL FINDINGS REPORT FOR AFRICAN LEOPARD SPORT HUNTING IN ZAMBIA MAY 2018 Photo Credit: Barry Bell-Cross. Various trail camera photos of leopards recorded in Lunga Luswishi GMA P/Bag 1, Chilanga Tel: (260) 211 278335, 211 278365 Fax: (260) 211 278365, 211 278244 Email: [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background to Zambia CITES Leopard Quotas ............................................................................ 1 2.0 Biological status ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Distribution ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Population status .................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Genetic Variability ................................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 Conservation and Management ................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Legislation ............................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 The Zambia Wildlife Act No. 14 of 2015 with particular reference to administration of Hunting, Licenses, and the Wildlife Fund. ................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Classes of licences ............................................................................................................................ 7 3.2.2 The Wildlife Fund ............................................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Supporting Statutory Instruments (SIs) .................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Zambia’s Conservation Strategy and Action Plan for lion ....................................................................... 8 3.5 Wildlife Conservation and Management ................................................................................................ 9 3.5.1 Law Enforcement Operations ......................................................................................................... 10 3.5.2 Wildlife Research............................................................................................................................ 13 3.5.3 Leopard Surveys and Methods ....................................................................................................... 13 3.6 Stakeholder Involvement in leopard Conservation .............................................................................. 14 3.6.1 Hunting Outfitters .......................................................................................................................... 14 3.6.2 Communities .................................................................................................................................. 14 3.6.3 Non-Governmental Organizations ................................................................................................. 14 4.0 Utilization ................................................................................................................................. 16 4.1 Safari hunting in Zambia ....................................................................................................................... 16 4.2 Leopard hunting Areas .......................................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 GMAs .............................................................................................................................................. 16 4.2.2 Open Game Ranches ...................................................................................................................... 16 4.3 Hunting Quotas ..................................................................................................................................... 17 4.3.1 Quota allocation process ............................................................................................................... 18 4.3.2 Leopard Quotas and utilisation ...................................................................................................... 20 4.3.3 Guidelines for Hunting Leopards .................................................................................................... 23 4.4 Allocation of hunting concessions ........................................................................................................ 24 4.4.1 Obligations of the concessionaire in the hunting concession agreement ...................................... 25 4.4.2 Compliance to obligations of the concession agreement .............................................................. 28 4.5.1 Quota monitoring........................................................................................................................... 28 4.5.2 Leopard Hunting Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 29 4.6 International Trade ............................................................................................................................... 33 i 5.0 Involvement of the hunting sector in leopard Conservation .................................................... 34 5.1 Benefits of leopard hunting in Zambia.................................................................................................. 34 5.1.1 Ecological Benefits ......................................................................................................................... 34 5.1.2. Economic Benefits ......................................................................................................................... 34 5.1.3. Social Benefits ............................................................................................................................... 35 5.2 Transparency ......................................................................................................................................... 35 6.0 Threats and Mitigation ............................................................................................................ 36 6.1 Habitat Encroachment and Fragmentation .......................................................................................... 36 6.1.1 General Management Plans .......................................................................................................... 36 6.1.3 Open Game Ranches and Trans-frontiers Conservation Areas ...................................................... 37 6.2 Human-Leopard Conflict ....................................................................................................................... 38 6.3 Bush meat poaching and prey depletion .............................................................................................. 38 6.3.1 Prey Availability and abundance .................................................................................................... 38 7.0 Community Based Natural Resources Management (CBNRM) ................................................. 43 7.1 CBNRM in Zambia ................................................................................................................................. 43 7.2 Community Benefits ............................................................................................................................. 43 8.0 Revenues and Expenditures from Trophy Hunting ................................................................... 45 8.1 Animal and hunting fees ................................................................................................................... 45 8.2 Source of revenues to the DNPW ......................................................................................................... 45 8.2.1 Revenues from leopard hunting ........................................................................................................ 47 8.3 Expenditures of revenues ..................................................................................................................... 48 8.4 Funds disbursed to Communities ......................................................................................................... 50 9.0 Conclusions and Non-detriment findings ................................................................................. 51 10.0 References ............................................................................................................................. 53 Annex 1 - Assessment of the Zambia DNPW Enhancement and Non-Detriment Findings against the IUCN SSC “Guiding principles on trophy hunting as a tool for creating conservation incentives. Ver. 1.0. IUCN SSC (2012)” .................................................................................................................... 55 Annex 2: Contact details for selected Hunting Associations and NGO’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fostering Accountability and Transparency (FACT) in Zambia Quarterly Report
    Fostering Accountability and Transparency (FACT) in Zambia Quarterly Report January 1 to March 30, 2019 Youth Symposium Participants Outside FQM Trident Foundation Limited Offices after receiving training from one of FACT partners Submission Date: April 30, 2019 Submitted by: Chilufya Kasutu Agreement Number: Chief of Party AID-611-14-L-00001 Counterpart International, Zambia Email: [email protected] Submitted to: Edward DeMarco, USAID Zambia AOR This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development, Zambia (USAID/Zambia). It was prepared by Counterpart International. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AOR Agreement Officer’s Representative ART Anti-Retroviral Treatment CCAs Community Conservation Areas CCPs Community Conservation Plans CFGs Community Forest Groups CEFTA Citizens Engagement in Fostering Transparency and Accountability COMACO Community Markets for Conservation CRB Community Resource Boards CSPR Civil Society for Poverty Reduction CSO Civil Society Organization DAC District Advocacy Committee DAMI District Alternative Mining Indaba DDCC District Development Coordinating Committee DEBS District Education Board Secretary DHO District Health Office DIM District Integrated Meetings EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative ESSP Education and Skills Sector Plan FACT Fostering Accountability and Transparency FZS Frankfurt Zoological Society GPE Global Partnership for Education GRZ Government of the Republic of Zambia HCC Health Centre Committee HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus LAG
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Management Models in Africa
    Collaborative Management Models in Africa Peter Lindsey Mujon Baghai Introduction to the context behind the development of and rationale for CMPs in Africa Africa’s PAs represent potentially priceless assets due to the environmental services they provide and for their potential economic value via tourism However, the resources allocated for management of PAs are far below what is needed in most countries to unlock their potential A study in progress indicates that of 22 countries assessed, half have average PA management budgets of <10% of what is needed for effective management (Lindsey et al. in prep) This means that many countries will lose their wildlife assets before ever really being able to benefit from them So why is there such under-investment? Two big reasons - a) competing needs and overall budget shortages; b) a high burden of PAs relative to wealth However, in some cases underinvestment may be due to: ● Misconceptions that PAs can pay for themselves on a park level ● Lack of appreciation among policy makers that PAs need investment to yield economic dividends This mistake has grave consequences… This means that in most countries, PA networks are not close to delivering their potential: • Economic value • Social value • Ecological value Africa’s PAs are under growing pressure from an array of threats Ed Sayer ProtectedInsights areas fromare becoming recent rapidly research depleted in many areas There is a case for elevated support for Africa’s PA network from African governments But also a case for greater investment from
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Lake Mweru Wa Ntipa National Park
    Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa (Volume 15, No.5, 2013) ISSN: 1520-5509 Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, Pennsylvania HISTORICAL CHANGES IN THE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF THE LAKE MWERU WA NTIPA WETLAND ECOSYSTEM OVER THE LAST 150 YEARS: A DRYING LAKE? 1Chansa Chomba; 2Ramadhani Senzota, 3Harry Chabwela and 4Vincent Nyirenda 1School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Disaster Management Training Centre, Mulungushi University Kabwe, Zambia 2Department of Zoology and Wildlife Conservation, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia 4Zambia Wildlife Authority ABSTRACT This paper is the first comprehensive historical account of the changes in the ecology and management of Lake Mweru wa Ntipa wetland ecosystem over the period 1867-2013. It highlights major socio-ecological and management regime changes in the last 150 years. This period started when the Scottish explorer Dr. David Livingstone documented it in 1867, through the colonial era when Zambia was called Northern Rhodesia to the present time (2013). In the 1860s there was a red locust out break and the area was as a consequence of this outbreak placed under the International Red Locust Control Service until 1956 when it was declared a Game Reserve by the Government of Northern Rhodesia, National Park in 1972 and in 2005 a Ramsar site and Important Bird Area. We also provide an account of the cyclic phases of wet and dry spells of the lake recorded between 1867 - 2013. In the 20th century in particular, the wet and dry spells created an idea habitat for the locust breeding which attracted in the first instance, the attention of the colonial government and the International Red Locust Control Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities of Small Mammals in Kafue National Park and Their Response to Fire, Vegetation and Land Use
    Communities of small mammals in Kafue National Park and their response to fire, vegetation and land use DISSERTATION submitted for the degree of Doctor of Science (Dr. rer. nat.) Department of Animal Ecology and Conservation University of Hamburg Photo taken by: Neeta Simunji submitted by Ngawo Namukonde Hamburg, 2017 i Revised version Dissertation reviewers: Prof. Dr. Jörg U Ganzhorn Prof. Dr. Japhet K Mbata Date of oral defense: 24th November, 2017 ii Summary Small mammals assume multiple and cardinal roles in ecosystem functionality. They are known to influence the composition and structure of plant communities through their herbivorous and seed predation activities, as agents of soil aeration through their burrowing activities, pest controllers as the consume large amounts of insects and plant material, and as food for a variety of prey. Yet, the understanding of small mammal ecology is overshadowed by studies of large mammals as small mammals have very little tourism appeal and are often viewed as vermin benefiting from human disturbances. Even so, many small mammals are known to be highly sensitive to anthropogenic factors. This lack of information on small mammals also applies to the Kafue National Park (KNP), Zambia, including the Busanga Flood Plain as one of KNP’s critical habitats and a wetland of international importance (RAMSAR site number 1659). Not much is known about small mammals in the KNP, much less the influence of anthropogenic and non-antropogenic factors on their communities. Given that KNP is a protected area where the human foot print is minimized, anthropogenic factors that act upon the communities of small mammals include bush fires, that occur repeatedly (annually) on wildlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years of the Kasempa District, Zambia 1964 – 2014 Change and Continuity
    FIFTY YEARS OF THE KASEMPA DISTRICT, ZAMBIA 1964 – 2014 CHANGE AND CONTINUITY. A case study of the ups and downs within a remote rural Zambian region during the fifty years since Independence. A descriptive analysis of its demography, geography, infrastructure, agricultural practice and present and traditional cultural aspects, including an account on the traditional ceremony of the installation of regional Headmen and the role and functions of the Kaonde clan structure. Dick Jaeger, 2015 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES...........................................................................................................3 PART I 4 PREFACE – A WORD OF THANKS.....................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY......................................................................................................6 CHAPTER 1. DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES.......................................................................................10 ZAMBIA.............................................................................................................................10 KASEMPA DISTRICT........................................................................................................10 CHAPTER 2. AGRICULTURE............................................................................................................12 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile Republic of Zambia Giraffe Conservation Status Report
    Country Profile Republic of Zambia Giraffe Conservation Status Report Sub-region: Southern Africa General statistics Size of country: 752,614 km² Size of protected areas / percentage protected area coverage: 30% (Sub)species Thornicroft’s giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti) Angolan giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis) – possible South African giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa) – possible Conservation Status IUCN Red List (IUCN 2012): Giraffa camelopardalis (as a species) – least concern G. c. thornicrofti – not assessed G. c. angolensis – not assessed G. c. giraffa – not assessed In the Republic of Zambia: The Zambia Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) is mandated under the Zambia Wildlife Act No. 12 of 1998 to manage and conserve Zambia’s wildlife and under this same act, the hunting of giraffe in Zambia is illegal (ZAWA 2015). Zambia has the second largest proportion of land under protected status in Southern Africa with approximately 225,000 km2 designated as protected areas. This equates to approximately 30% of the total land cover and of this, approximately 8% as National Parks (NPs) and 22% as Game Management Areas (GMA). The remaining protected land consists of bird sanctuaries, game ranches, forest and botanical reserves, and national heritage sites (Mwanza 2006). The Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA TFCA), is potentially the world’s largest conservation area, spanning five southern African countries; Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe, centred around the Caprivi-Chobe-Victoria Falls area (KAZA 2015). Parks within Zambia that fall under KAZA are: Liuwa Plain, Kafue, Mosi-oa-Tunya and Sioma Ngwezi (Peace Parks Foundation 2013). GCF is dedicated to securing a future for all giraffe populations and (sub)species in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • African Parks 2 African Parks
    African Parks 2 African Parks African Parks is a non-profit conservation organisation that takes on the total responsibility for the rehabilitation and long-term management of national parks in partnership with governments and local communities. By adopting a business approach to conservation, supported by donor funding, we aim to rehabilitate each park making them ecologically, socially and financially sustainable in the long-term. Founded in 2000, African Parks currently has 15 parks under management in nine countries – Benin, Central African Republic, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Republic of Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda and Zambia. More than 10.5 million hectares are under our protection. We also maintain a strong focus on economic development and poverty alleviation in neighbouring communities, ensuring that they benefit from the park’s existence. Our goal is to manage 20 parks by 2020, and because of the geographic spread and representation of different ecosystems, this will be the largest and the most ecologically diverse portfolio of parks under management by any one organisation across Africa. Black lechwe in Bangweulu Wetlands in Zambia © Lorenz Fischer The Challenge The world’s wild and functioning ecosystems are fundamental to the survival of both people and wildlife. We are in the midst of a global conservation crisis resulting in the catastrophic loss of wildlife and wild places. Protected areas are facing a critical period where the number of well-managed parks is fast declining, and many are simply ‘paper parks’ – they exist on maps but in reality have disappeared. The driving forces of this conservation crisis is the human demand for: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Project Brief
    Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVED RURAL CONNECTIVITY Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT (IRCP) REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY FEEDER ROADS IN EASTERN PROVINCE Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT BRIEF September 2020 SUBMITTED BY EASTCONSULT/DASAN CONSULT - JV Public Disclosure Authorized Improved Rural Connectivity Project Environmental Project Brief for the Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of the Republic Zambia (GRZ) is seeking to increase efficiency and effectiveness of the management and maintenance of the of the Primary Feeder Roads (PFR) network. This is further motivated by the recognition that the road network constitutes the single largest asset owned by the Government, and a less than optimal system of the management and maintenance of that asset generally results in huge losses for the national economy. In order to ensure management and maintenance of the PFR, the government is introducing the OPRC concept. The OPRC is a concept is a contracting approach in which the service provider is paid not for ‘inputs’ but rather for the results of the work executed under the contract i.e. the service provider’s performance under the contract. The initial phase of the project, supported by the World Bank will be implementing the Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) in some selected districts of Central, Eastern, Northern, Luapula, Southern and Muchinga Provinces. The project will be implemented in Eastern Province for a period of five (5) years from 2020 to 2025 using the Output and Performance Road Contract (OPRC) approach. GRZ thus intends to roll out the OPRC on the PFR Network covering a total of 14,333Kms country-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Deschooling Language Study in East Africa: the Zambia Plan
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 223,074 FL 013 270 AUTHOR Roberts, David Harrill TITLE Deschooling Language Study in East Africa: The Zambia Plan. PUB DATE 79 NOTE 15p.; Paper presented at the DelawareSymposium on Language Study (Newark, DE, October1979). PUB TYPE Speeches/Conference Papers (150) -- Viewpoints(120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adults; Autoinstructional Aids; Bantu Languages; *Bemba; Communicative Competence (Languages);Drills (Practice); Foreign Countries; *Independent Study; Native Speakers; *Second Language Learning; Speech Communication IDENTIFIERS Zambia ABSTRACT The second language learning methods ofSouthern Baptist missionaries in Zambia are described.Instead of studying the new language in a schoolsetting, the student receives a week of orientation and is then placed in the community andexpected to practice communicating with the native speakers at everyopportunity. The student follows a course prepared bythe Foreign Service Institute and uses textbooks for self-teaching.The emphasis is placed on observation of and involvementwith the native population as well as frequent practicespeaking the new language with native speakers. A native language informantis employed by each missionary to assist in intonation andpronunciation. A series of language drill tapes and a self:paced programtitled "First Lessons in Bemba" provide support for language practice. Thestudent prepares a speech related to daily, living and then practicesit in the community as often as possible during the course of aday. This language learning approach has been successful and widelyaccepted by the Zambians. It is seen as a means of combatting theethnocentrism and cultural myopia prevalent in the United States andlearning about the diverse languages and cultures of the world.(RW) *********************************************************************** * * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that canbe made * * from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate Kafue
    Ultimate Kafue Being an area roughly the size of Wales, the variety of landscapes, animal and bird life of the Kafue National Park are unmatched. The Ultimate Kafue safari allows you to visit the park in depth, travelling from the northern Busanga Plains, to southern Nanzhila Plains and all the wilderness in between. You will experience real remoteness, breath-taking river landscapes and encounter wildlife undisturbed. This 15 day / 14 night safari accommodates you in five selected safari camps and includes a ‘five nights for four’ stay at KaingU with a selection of special activities, an optional island sleepout or just time to relax. Travel Dates: 01st July to 31st October 2019 ZAMBIAZAMBIA KAFUE N.P. ZIMBABWE NAMIBIA BOTSWANA Ultimate Kafue Brief Safari Overview: Start your ultimate visit to the Kafue National Park from Lusaka or Livingstone. A charter flight connects from/to Lusaka and the transfer to/from Livingstone is done by road. (Private charter flights to/from Livingstone are available too, please enquire.) This ultimate trip through the Kafue National Park will take you to the famous Busanga Plains in the north, through Miombo woodlands and dambos, following the varied Kafue river system to Lake Itezhi Tezhi and to the Nanzhila Plains in the south. As the crow flies, you will travel a distance of over 240km from north to south in one park. As the land varies, so do its inhabitants. You will encounter large herds of lechwe, wildebeest, roan and numerous sightings of the rare wattled cranes in the Busanga Plains. The Miombo woodlands and dambos provide home to a greater variety of mammal and bird species.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Changes in the Nyimba District of Zambia
    7 Agrarian changes in the Nyimba District of Zambia Davison J Gumbo, Kondwani Y Mumba, Moka M Kaliwile, Kaala B Moombe and Tiza I Mfuni Summary Over the past decade issues pertaining to land sharing/land sparing have gained some space in the debate on the study of land-use strategies and their associated impacts at landscape level. State and non-state actors have, through their interests and actions, triggered changes at the landscape level and this report is a synthesis of some of the main findings and contributions of a scoping study carried out in Zambia as part of CIFOR’s Agrarian Change Project. It focuses on findings in three villages located in the Nyimba District. The villages are located on a high (Chipembe) to low (Muzenje) agricultural land-use gradient. Nyimba District, which is located in the country’s agriculturally productive Eastern Province, was selected through a two-stage process, which also considered another district, Mpika, located in Zambia’s Muchinga Province. The aim was to find a landscape in Zambia that would provide much needed insights into how globally conceived land-use strategies (e.g. land-sharing/land-sparing trajectories) manifest locally, and how they interact with other change processes once they are embedded in local histories, culture, and political and market dynamics. Nyimba District, with its history of concentrated and rigorous policy support in terms of agricultural intensification over different epochs, presents Zambian smallholder farmers as victims and benefactors of policy pronouncements. This chapter shows Agrarian changes in the Nyimba District of Zambia • 235 the impact of such policies on the use of forests and other lands, with agriculture at the epicenter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bangweulu Hunting Memo Who: This Brief Document Is for the Public
    Bangweulu Hunting Memo Who: This brief document is for the public (to be placed on our website), key donors and partners who have a stake or vested interested in sustainable use of wildlife resources. Background Bangweulu Wetlands is a vast wetland ecosystem that is situated in north-eastern Zambia, covering an area of 6,000 km2. Bangweulu is unique in that it is a Game Management Area (GMA) and a community- owned protected wetland, home to 50,000 people who retain the right to sustainably harvest its natural resources and who depend on the natural resources the park provides. These wetlands and the adjoining lake Bangweulu are biologically significant. The area has been declared a RAMSAR site and contains diverse flora and fauna, including more than 433 bird species. The GMA encompasses most of the distribution of the endemic black lechwe antelope, as well as several other iconic species unique to the area, including the shoebill stork, and remnant elephant and buffalo populations. This landscape has been managed by the Bangweulu Wetlands Management Board (BWMB) since 2008. The Board is a partnership between conservation organisation African Parks, the Zambia Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW), as well as six Community Resource Boards associated with each Chiefdom. The mission of BWMB is to restore the functioning of the Bangweulu ecosystem, a critical wetland habitat of rich biodiversity that provides socio-economic benefits to the local communities. Prior to the partnership with African Parks, rampant poaching and unrestricted fishing had depleted the area’s natural resources, including the black lechwe population.
    [Show full text]