5 Fresno Canyon Draft EIR Part 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5 Fresno Canyon Draft EIR Part 2 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.3.1 INTRODUCTION This section discusses the common and special-status biological resources existing within the Fresno Canyon project site, the current status of these resources before project implementation, the potential significant adverse impacts on these resources from the proposed project implementation within the project site area, and measures to mitigate these impacts. This analysis is based on the March 2013 Initial Study for the proposed project, the June 2009 Draft Biological Assessment prepared for The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by URS Group, Inc., the subsequent July 2013 Biological Assessment supplement prepared for FEMA by Impact Sciences, the January 2010 Biological Opinion (BO) prepared by US Fish and Wildlife Service for the subject project, review of relevant literature and data, and recent field studies on and adjacent to the subject project site. Background The Ventura County Watershed Protection District (VCWPD) proposes to construct a flood control facility to transport floodwater, sediment, and debris from Fresno Canyon to the Ventura River. This project is intended to reduce the risk of flooding in the community of Casitas Springs in Ventura County, California, and on SR-33. FEMA proposes to provide Pre-disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program federal financial assistance (federal action) (PDM-PJ-09-CA-2007-013) to VCWPD (Subgrantee), through the California Emergency Management Agency (f/k/a Governor’s Office of Emergency Services), in support of the Fresno Canyon Flood Mitigation Project. The PDM Program assists states and communities by providing federal financial assistance to implement sustained, pre-disaster, natural-hazard mitigation programs to reduce the risk of injury and damage from natural disasters and also to reduce reliance on funding from disaster declarations. In 2009, URS Group, Inc., assisted FEMA by preparing a Draft Biological Assessment to be submitted to National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for evaluation of resources that are under their jurisdiction (Appendix C). The US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was also consulted with respect to special-status resources under their jurisdiction. The FWS subsequently prepared a BO in January 2010 addressing potential effects of the proposed project on the federally Threatened California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) and the federally Endangered least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax trailllii extimus) in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (Act)(16 USC 1531 et seq.) (Appendix C). Impact Sciences, Inc. 4.3-1 Fresno Canyon Flood Mitigation Project Draft EIR 1137.001 December 2013 4.3 Biological Resources In July 2013, Impact Sciences prepared a supplement to the Biological Assessment for NMFS that primarily focused on potential impacts to the Endangered Southern California steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Distinct Population Segment (DPS) and its associated Critical Habitat (Appendix C). 4.3.2 METHODOLOGY Literature Review Documentation pertinent to the biological resources on and near the site was reviewed and analyzed. Information reviewed included: (1) the Federal Register listing package for the federally listed species known to occur in the area1; (2) literature pertaining to habitat requirements of sensitive species potentially occurring on the project site; (3) the most recent updates of the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB)2 and California Native Plant Society (CNPS)3 information regarding sensitive species potentially occurring on and near the project site and (4) previous biological studies conducted on the subject property. The database query included the Ventura, California US Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle, in which the project site is located, as well as the following six surrounding quadrangles: Matilija, Ojai, Saticoy, Oxnard, Pitas Point, and White Ledge Peak. Additionally, all biological studies previously prepared for the project were reviewed. Field Studies Impact Sciences’ biologist Dave Crawford conducted a field visit at the project site on September 21, 2012. The purpose of the site visit was to characterize and evaluate the existing conditions and the potential of the on-site habitats to support special-status animal species and to inventory wildlife species present at the time of the survey. On October 11, 2012, Dr. Edith Read of E. Read and Associates visited the site to map existing vegetation associations, evaluate the existing conditions and the potential of the on-site habitats to support special-status plant species, and inventory plant species present within the project area. The potential for special-status species to occur on the project site is based on the proximity of the site to recorded occurrences from the CNDDB and CNPS databases, knowledge of the project region, on-site 1 US Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Animal Candidate Review for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species; Proposed Rule Federal Register 50, CFR Part 17. US Department of the Interior. Washington, DC. 1996. 2 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Data Base. Commercial Version, Update July 2, 2012 and August 6, 2013. 3 California Native Plant Society. 2013. Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California. Online database available at: http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/. Accessed July 2012 and August 2013. Impact Sciences, Inc. 4.3-2 Fresno Canyon Flood Mitigation Project Draft EIR 1137.001 December 2013 4.3 Biological Resources vegetation, habitat characteristics, topography, elevation, soils, surrounding land uses, and habitat preferences and geographic ranges of special-status plant and animals species known to occur in the project region. 4.3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Project Location The project area is approximately 5 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean in the community of Casitas Springs in Ventura County, California, immediately north (upstream) of Foster Park. It is located south of the Ojai Valley and surrounded by three mountain ranges. To the north the Nordhoff Ridge extends to approximately 5,000 feet above mean sea level (amsl). This ridge continues to the Topa Topa Bluff east of the Ojai Valley which stands 6,000 feet amsl. Sulphur Mountain bounds the Ojai Valley on the south at just under 3,000 feet amsl. Elevation at the site is approximately 280 feet amsl. Foster Park is adjacent and south of the site and Lake Casitas is approximately 1.3 miles to the northwest. The project area encompasses a small section of the Ventura River bank and extends approximately 1,400 feet east of the Ventura River on to adjacent uplands. The uplands include some riparian areas, woodland, scrub, residential areas, and a crossing of SR-33. The climate in the project area is Mediterranean and characterized by hot, dry summers and mild winters. As is typical for much of coastal Southern California, most precipitation falls in the form of rain between the months of October and April with intervening dry summers. The average temperatures in the summer months are in the upper 80 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) with lows in the mid-50s °F. Average temperatures in the winter months are in the high 60s °F with lows in the mid-30s °F. Rainfall averages 18.4 inches per year with between 2 and 5 inches per month falling between November and March. Existing Conditions The site includes a small portion of the eastern bank of the Ventura River and extends inland eastward for approximately 1,400 feet. The upland areas include oak woodlands, coastal scrub, residential development, and a crossing of SR-33. Vegetation Vegetation assemblages observed on the Fresno Canyon project site area is described below. Vegetation classifications generally follow Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf.4 Table 4.3-1, below, provides a list of all plant species recorded during the October 2012 survey. 4 Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf. A Manual of California Vegetation. 2nd ed. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, California. 2009. Impact Sciences, Inc. 4.3-3 Fresno Canyon Flood Mitigation Project Draft EIR 1137.001 December 2013 4.3 Biological Resources Table 4.3-1 Vascular Plant Species Recorded on the Project Site Latin Name Common Name Gymnosperms Conifers Pinaceae Pine Family Pinus muricata Bishop pine Dicots Flowering Plants Adoxaceae Muskroot Family Sambucus nigra L. ssp. caerulea (Raf.) Bolli blue elderberry Anacardiaceae Sumac Family Rhus integrifolia (Nutt.) Brewer & S. Watson lemonadeberry Schinus molle L.* Peruvian pepper tree Apiaceae Carrot Family Foeniculum vulgare Mill.* fennel Apocynaceae Dogbane Family Vinca major L. * periwinkle Araliaceae Ginseng Family Hedera helix* English ivy Asteraceae Sunflower Family Ambrosia psilostachya DC. western ragweed Artemisia californica Less. California sagebrush Baccharis pilularis DC. coyote brush Baccharis salicifolia (Ruiz Lopez & Pavon) Pers. mule fat Helminthotheca echioides (L.) Holub* bristly ox-tongue Lessingia filaginifolia (Hook. & Arn.) M.A. Lane California-aster Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.* milk thistle Xanthium sp.* cocklebur Betulaceae Birch Family Alnus rhombifolia Nutt. white alder Brassicaceae Mustard Family Brassica nigra (L.) W.D.J. Koch* black mustard Cactaceae Cactus Family Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller* Indian fig cactus Cucurbitaceae Cucumber Family Marah fabacea (Naudin) Greene California man-root Fabaceae Legume
Recommended publications
  • Xanthium Strumarium, on Species Diversity and Composition of Invaded Plant Communities in Borena Zone, Ethiopia
    Biodiversity International Journal Research Article Open Access Impact of invasive alien plant, Xanthium strumarium, on species diversity and composition of invaded plant communities in Borena zone, Ethiopia Abstract Volume 1 Issue 1 - 2017 Biological invasion is considered as the second greatest global threat to biodiversity. Amare Seifu, Nigussie Seboka, Manaye An IAPS, Xanthium strumarium, is widely spread in the agricultural land, roadside, near stagnant water and disturbed land of Borena Zone, Oromia Region. However, its Misganaw, Tesfaye Bekele, Edget Merawi, impact on diversity and floristic composition of the invaded plant communities has not Ashenafi Ayenew, Girum Faris been determined. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the impact Genetic Resources Access and Benefit Sharing Directorate, of Xanthium strumarium, on the species diversity and composition of invaded plant Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, Ethiopia communities in Borena Zone. Accordingly, to examine its effects of invasions on the Correspondence: Amare Seifu, Genetic Resources Access species diversity and composition of invaded communities, ninety six 1m2 quadrats and Benefit Sharing Directorate, Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, were sampled (48 quadrats for invaded and 48 for non-invaded or control).There were Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Tel +251916595709, 70 species found in the non-invaded areas as compared to 31 in the invaded areas. Email [email protected] The number of species decreased by 55.71% in Xanthium strumarium invaded area as compared to control. The mean evenness value of the entire invaded sampled study Received: May 26, 2017 | Published: June 30, 2017 sites was 0.27 indicated that 27% of the plant communities had uniform distribution while the mean evenness value of the controls samples was 0.74 indicated that 74% of the plant communities had uniform distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Assessment
    APPENDIX B: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Sierra West Assisted Living and Memory Care Project City of Santa Clarita APNs 2827-005-042 & -043 Prepared for: MR. NORRIS WHITMORE P.O. Box 55786 Valencia, CA 91385 Attn: Mr. Norris Whitmore (661) 406-0961 Prepared by: ENVICOM CORPORATION 4165 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 290 WestlaKe Village, CA 91362 Contact: Jim Anderson, Senior Biologist (818) 879-4700 ext. 234 January 2020 Revised February 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 METHODS 1 2.1 Biological Resources Inventory 1 2.1.1 Literature Review 1 2.1.2 Field Survey 4 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4 4.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 6 4.1 Vegetation and Plant Communities 6 4.1.1 Vegetation 6 4.1.2 Natural Communities of Special Concern 8 4.1.3 Plant Communities/Habitats Listed in CNDDB 9 4.2 Plant Species 10 4.2.1 Plant Species Observed 10 4.2.2 Special-Status Plant Species 10 4.3 Wildlife Species 12 4.3.1 Wildlife Observed 12 4.3.2 Special-Status Wildlife Species 12 4.4 Wildlife Movement 15 5.0 PROJECT IMPACTS 16 5.1 Impacts to Special-Status Plants 18 5.2 Impacts to Special-Status Wildlife 19 5.3 Impacts to Nesting Birds 20 6.0 REFERENCES 22 FIGURES Figure 1 Location Map 2 Figure 2 Aerial Image of the Project Site/Photo Location Map 3 Figure 3 Vegetation and Impacts Map 7 PLATE Plate 1 Representative Photographs of the Project Site and Habitats 5 Biological Resources Assessment S ierra West Assisted Living and Memory Care Project City of Santa Clarita i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES Table 1 Natural
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey Report Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project Point Reyes National Seashore Marin County, California
    Botanical Survey Report Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project Point Reyes National Seashore Marin County, California Prepared By: Lorraine Parsons Point Reyes National Seashore Division of Natural Resources Management Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 May 17, 2002 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 REGULATORY BACKGROUND The purpose of this report is to provide background information regarding botanical resources within the Horseshoe Pond Restoration Project area (Proposed Project Area). Point Reyes National Seashore (Seashore) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Proposed Project. Background information in this report will be used to guide development and assess potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. As part of the EA, the Seashore must consider whether the Proposed Project could impact special status plant species, as well as special status wildlife species and other sensitive biological resources such as wetlands and riparian areas. Special status plant species include those that are legally protected under the federal and California Endangered Species Acts (ESA) or other regulations and species that are considered rare by the scientific community. Special status species are defined as: • plants that are listed or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered under the California ESA (Fish and Game Code §2050 et seq.; 14 CCR §670.1 et seq.) and/or the federal ESA (50 CFR 17.11 for animals; various notices in the Federal Register [FR] for proposed species); • plants that are candidates for possible future listing as threatened or endangered under the federal ESA (61 FR 7506 February 28, 1996); • plants that meet the definition of rare or endangered under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (14 CCR §15380) which includes species not found on state or federal endangered species lists; • plants that are designated as “species of concern” (former category 2 candidates for listing) by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiny Cocklebur Row Crop (Xanthium Spinosum L.) Gary N
    Spiny cocklebur Row Crop (Xanthium spinosum L.) Gary N. Ervin, Ph.D., Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University John D. Madsen, Ph.D., Geosystems Research Institute, Mississippi State University Ryan M. Wersal, Geosystems Research Institute, Mississippi State University Fig. 1. Spiny cocklebur spreads by seeds Fig. 2. Spiny cocklebur has male and female flowers Fig. 3. Spiny cocklebur plants grow to clinging to animal fur or human clothing. on the same plant. five feet tall. Introduction Problems Created Spiny cocklebur is an annual plant found in highly disturbed habitats and farm areas. The burs (fruits) of this species become tangled in the fur of livestock, increasing costs to the consumers of wool products. It competes with crops and is a nuisance when growing with hand-harvested crops. The seeds and seedlings of spiny cocklebur are poisonous if consumed, and they are particularly toxic to swine and horses. Regulations Spiny cocklebur is listed as a “B” designated quarantine weed in Oregon and a class “C” noxious weed in Washington. In Arkan- sas, the genus Xanthium is listed as noxious weeds, likely more for spiny cocklebur’s congener Xanthium strumarium (rough cocklebur), which has a much wider distribution in the state. Description Vegetative Growth Spiny cocklebur is an annual plant that blooms in summer. It grows to 5’ tall with striate stems that are yellowish or brownish gray. The leaves may be entire or toothed or lobed. The lower surface of the leaves is covered with white hairs, and the upper leaf surface is white-veined. Leaves are 1’’to 3’’ long and have a 3-forked spine at the leaf base, giving this species the common name “spiny” cocklebur.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgrath State Beach Plants 2/14/2005 7:53 PM Vascular Plants of Mcgrath State Beach, Ventura County, California by David L
    Vascular Plants of McGrath State Beach, Ventura County, California By David L. Magney Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Abronia maritima Red Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Abronia umbellata Beach Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Allenrolfea occidentalis Iodinebush S Chenopodiaceae Amaranthus albus * Prostrate Pigweed AH Amaranthaceae Amblyopappus pusillus Dwarf Coastweed PH Asteraceae Ambrosia chamissonis Beach-bur S Asteraceae Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed PH Asteraceae Amsinckia spectabilis var. spectabilis Seaside Fiddleneck AH Boraginaceae Anagallis arvensis * Scarlet Pimpernel AH Primulaceae Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa PH Saururaceae Apium graveolens * Wild Celery PH Apiaceae Artemisia biennis Biennial Wormwood BH Asteraceae Artemisia californica California Sagebrush S Asteraceae Artemisia douglasiana Douglas' Sagewort PH Asteraceae Artemisia dracunculus Wormwood PH Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Big Sagebrush S Asteraceae Arundo donax * Giant Reed PG Poaceae Aster subulatus var. ligulatus Annual Water Aster AH Asteraceae Astragalus pycnostachyus ssp. lanosissimus Ventura Marsh Milkvetch PH Fabaceae Atriplex californica California Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex lentiformis ssp. breweri Big Saltbush S Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula ssp. hastata Arrowleaf Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula Spear Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex semibaccata Australian Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex triangularis Spearscale AH Chenopodiaceae Avena barbata * Slender Oat AG Poaceae Avena fatua * Wild
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Ventura River Watershed Section
    Appendix C Ventura River Watershed Section Submitted by the Ventura River Watershed Council Ventura River Watershed Ventura River Watershed Section of the Watersheds Coalition of Ventura County Integrated Water Management Plan Update, 2014 May, 2014 Photo by David Magney Note: This document has been excerpted from a draft of the Ventura River Watershed Management Plan, which is still a work in progress. Some sections of that plan have not yet been written; the apparent mistakes in section numbering in this document reflect those unwritten sections. In addition, there could be cross-references to context that has been omitted in this excerpted version. Ventura River Watershed Section Watersheds Coalition of Ventura County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update 2014 1 Part 1 - Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Ventura River Watershed Council ...................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Participants .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.2 Council History, Structure & Governance ................................................................................... 5 1.2.3 Council Milestones .................................................................................................................... 18 1.2.4 Council Funding ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Basins
    PART 3 • 3.3 Hydrology • 3.3.3 Groundwater Hydrology 333 V E N T U R A C O U N T Y r. C j a i l i t a M M k atil o r ija C or th F ree N n k o y n n a o on C y y y n e n l a a d C i C t r r r a G Matilija a o c i w n n Reservoir e a e t r r S S A N T A S a B k B A R B A R A n e C r re o C o y e l k k y n l e e C O U N T Y v e o a e e i N r t Meiners C c Cree r e C s k C R x M e Oaks r v r e o e C e e o Sa nta An a F Tha c h R m r a a e Cr eek r Upper c y e u Ojai S k t Ojai n Mir a e Monte V k þ e ek ·150 e n yo n C re r io n C a C L io n to Oak n View A n a S Lake Casitas ek re Cas itas C Springs a g r a L d a Ca ña ·þ33 P a c i f ¤£101 i c O c e a ·þ126 n Ventura Data Sources: CDWR Bulletin 118, Kear Groundwater, Ventur a River Ventura County Watershed Protection District, Estuary ¤£101 Ojai Basin GMA, Daniel B.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Plant Records for North American Ragweed Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) 1
    Vol. 95, No. 2. March & April 1984 51 HOST PLANT RECORDS FOR NORTH AMERICAN RAGWEED FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) 1 B.A. Foote2 ABSTRACT: Information is given on host plants and infestation rates for 7 of the 8 North American species of Euaresta. The host plants are either ragweeds of the genus Ambrosia or cockleburs of the genus Xanthium, 2 genera of the tribe Ambrosieae (Compositae). The genus Euaresta is a relatively small taxon within the family Tephritidae of the acalyptrate Diptera. It includes 8 species from America north of Mexico (Quisenberry, 1950; Foote, 1965), as well as several from south of the United States; however, virtually no host data are available for these latter species and some doubt exists as to whether they actually belong to the genus (R.H. Foote, in litt.). Relatively little is known of the life histories or larval feeding habits of the Nearctic species except that they seem to be associated either with cockleburs of the genus Xanthium or ragweeds of the genus Ambrosia (Compositae: Ambrosieae). Marlatt 1 1 the ( 89 ) discussed natural history of E. aequalis(Loew), a seed predator of cocklebur (X. strumarium L.). Foote (1965) reported that larvae of E. bella(Loew) and E. festiva (Loew) attacked the seeds of common ragweed (A. artemisiifolia L.) and giant ragweed (A. trifida L.), respectively. He also listed host plants for selected species of Euaresta and discussed briefly the life cycles of E. bella and E. festiva. Batra (1979) described in considerable detail the courtship behavior and oviposition habits of these two species. Goeden and Ricker (1974a, 1974b, 1976) recorded host for plants E.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Ventura River
    C ALIFORNIA Ventura River T HREAT: DAM Summary The Risk Matilija Dam not only stands in the way of The Matilija Dam is a 200-foot high concrete the Ventura River’s endangered southern steel- arched structure that is owned by the Ventura head; it also prevents much-needed sand and County Flood Control District. It was built in sediment from flowing downstream and 1947 as part of the river’s flood control system replenishing popular southern California surf- and to provide water for the Ojai Valley. The ing beaches. While it is easy to find wide- dam lacks fish passage, so southern steelhead spread support for removing the dam, it will are blocked from approximately 50 percent of be harder to find money to complete the task. their historical spawning and rearing habitat. Federal, state, and local authorities must agree The fish were listed as endangered under the that removing the dam is a top priority and federal Endangered Species Act in 1997. must work together to find the necessary Because a massive amount of silt has built funds. up behind the structure, Matilija Dam no longer provides flood control benefits and pro- The River vides only minimal water storage capacity. The mainstem of the Ventura River flows The reservoir, which originally held 7,000 approximately 16 miles from the confluence acre-feet of water, now holds only 500 acre- of Matilija Creek and North Fork Matilija feet — and the storage capacity continues to Creek (located within the Los Padres National decrease. An estimated 5 million to 7 million Forest) to the Pacific Ocean near the City of cubic yards of sediment is backed up behind Ventura.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List
    Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Abronia turbinata Torr. ex S. Consortium of California Turbinate Sand-verbena A/PH Nyctaginaceae 2 Watson Herbaria Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (E.A. McGregor) Consortium of California Abrams' Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 1B.2 4-5 Reveal [synonym: Oxytheca Herbaria parishii var. abramsii] Acanthoscyphus parishii Consortium of California Parish Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 4.2 1 (Parry) Small var. parishii Herbaria Acmispon glaber var. Consortium of California brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet Short Deerweed PH Fabaceae 1 Herbaria Acmispon heermannii Heermann Lotus or Consortium of California (Durand & Hilg.) Brouillet var. PH Fabaceae 4 Hosackia Herbaria heermannii Acmispon heermannii var. Roundleaf Heermann Consortium of California PH Fabaceae 1 orbicularis (A. Gray) Brouillet Lotus or Hosackia Herbaria Acmispon junceus (Bentham) Consortium of California Rush Hosackia AH Fabaceae 2 Brouillet var. junceus Herbaria 1 Locally Important Plant List- Dec. 2018 Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Acmispon micranthus (Torrey Consortium of California Grab Hosackia or Lotus AH Fabaceae 3 & A. Gray) Brouillet Herbaria Acmispon parviflorus Consortium of California Tiny Lotus AH Fabaceae 2 (Bentham) D.D. Sokoloff Herbaria Consortium of California Agrostis hallii Vasey Hall's Bentgrass PG Poaceae 1 Herbaria Common or Broadleaf Consortium of California Alisma plantago-aquaticum L. PH Alismataceae 4 Water-plantain Herbaria Consortium of California Allium amplectens Torrey Narrowleaf Onion PG Alliaceae 1 Herbaria Allium denticulatum (Traub) Consortium of California Dentate Fringed Onion PG Alliaceae 1 D.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Origin and Relationships of The
    Symposium Program change, many natural adaptations have evolved Two mapped alternative hypothesis of the Arizona University —Natural History of within species to cope with these pressures. California Floristic Province (CFP) will be Nemacladus 39th Annual Southern California Conservation and management efforts can be presented, compared, and contrasted. One data California Campanulaceae demonstrate many Botanists Symposium: most successful when they work in concert with set covers the traditional CFP from patterns of evolution and geographic Origin and Relationships of the natural adaptive mechanisms. southwestern Oregon through cismontane distribution proposed in Raven and Axelrod’s 10:00-10:45 am Dr. Kathleen Kay, Assistant California to northwestern Baja California, seminal publication. The campanuloides are California Flora: Was Raven Ravin'? Mexico (Raven & Axlerod, 1978). The new October 20th, 2012 Professor, UC Santa Cruz—Origin and North Temperate in origin and came to Diversification of the California Flora data set removes much of comparatively California in three separate events, one path 8:00 am Registration wetter northern territory as well as the higher resulting in highly restricted species in mesic The California Floristic Province exhibits one of elevation areas of the Sierra Nevada (O’Brien 9:00-9:15 am Introductory Comments (Naomi conditions, another in xeric adapted, often the richest floras on the planet, with more than et al. (RSABG), unpublished). Floristic data at Fraga SCB President) 5500 native plant species, approximately 40% of edaphically restricted, annual species. the family, genus, and minimum-rank taxon Campanuloides here exhibit changes in 9:15:10:00 am Dr. Connie Millar, Senior which are endemic. Despite its impressive levels will be presented and discussed for both breeding system, from highly outcrossed to Scientist, USDA Forest Service, Pacific diversity and the attention it has garnered from alternatives.
    [Show full text]