DOCSLIB.ORG

Defining Aboriginal Rights to Water in Alberta: Do They Still “Exist”? How Extensive Are They? Monique M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Canadian Institute of Resources Law Institut canadien du droit des ressources Defining Aboriginal Rights to Water in Alberta: Do They Still “Exist”? How Extensive are They? Monique M. Passelac-Ross Research Associate Canadian Institute of Resources Law Christina M. Smith LL.M. (Candidate) Faculty of Law, University of Calgary CIRL Occasional Paper #29 April 2010 MFH 3353, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 Tel: (403) 220-3200 Fax: (403) 282-6182 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.cirl.ca CIRL Occasional Paper #29 All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher: Canadian Institute of Resources Law, Murray Fraser Hall, Room 3353 (MFH 3353), University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4 Copyright © 2010 Canadian Institute of Resources Law Institut canadien du droit des ressources University of Calgary Printed in Canada ii ♦ Defining Aboriginal Rights to Water in Alberta CIRL Occasional Paper #29 Canadian Institute of Resources Law The Canadian Institute of Resources Law was incorporated in 1979 with a mandate to examine the legal aspects of both renewable and non-renewable resources. Its work falls into three interrelated areas: research, education, and publication. The Institute has engaged in a wide variety of research projects, including studies on oil and gas, mining, forestry, water, electricity, the environment, aboriginal rights, surface rights, and the trade of Canada’s natural resources. The education function of the Institute is pursued by sponsoring conferences and short courses on particular topical aspects of resources law, and through teaching in the Faculty of Law at the University of Calgary. The major publication of the Institute is its ongoing looseleaf service, the Canada Energy Law Service, published in association with Carswell. The results of other Institute research are published as books and discussion papers. Manuscripts submitted by outside authors are considered. The Institute publishes a quarterly newsletter, Resources. The Institute is supported by the Alberta Law Foundation, the Government of Canada, and the private sector. The members of the Board of Directors are appointed by the Faculty of Law at the University of Calgary, the President of the University of Calgary, the Benchers of the Law Society of Alberta, the President of the Canadian Petroleum Law Foundation, and the Dean of Law at The University of Alberta. Additional members of the Board are elected by the appointed Directors. All enquiries should be addressed to: Information Resources Officer Canadian Institute of Resources Law Murray Fraser Hall, Room 3353 (MFH 3353) University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 Telephone: (403) 220-3200 Facsimile: (403) 282-6182 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cirl.ca Defining Aboriginal Rights to Water in Alberta ♦ iii CIRL Occasional Paper #29 Institut canadien du droit des ressources L’institut canadien du droit des ressources a été constitué en 1979 et a reçu pour mission d’étudier les aspects juridiques des ressources renouvelables et non renouvelables. Son travail porte sur trois domaines étroitement reliés entre eux, soit la recherche, l’enseignement et les publications. L’institut a entrepris une vaste gamme de projets de recherche, notamment des études portant sur le pétrole et le gaz, l’exploitation des mines, l’exploitation forestière, les eaux, l’électricité, l’environnement, les droits des autochtones, les droits de surface et le commerce des ressources naturelles du Canada. L’institut remplit ses fonctions éducatives en commanditant des conférences et des cours de courte durée sur des sujets d’actualité particuliers en droit des ressources et par le truchement de l’enseignement à la Faculté de droit de l’Université de Calgary. La plus importante publication de l’institut est son service de publication continue à feuilles mobiles intitulé le Canada Energy Law Service, publié conjointement avec Carswell. L’institut publie également les résultats d’autres recherches sous forme de livres et de documents d’étude. Les manuscrits soumis par des auteurs de l’extérieur sont également considérés. L’institut publie un bulletin trimestriel intitulé Resources. L’institut reçoit des subventions de la Alberta Law Foundation, du gouvernement du Canada et du secteur privé. Les membres du conseil d’administration sont nommés par la Faculté de droit de l’Université de Calgary, le recteur de l’Université de Calgary, les conseillers de la Law Society of Alberta, le président de la Canadian Petroleum Law Foundation et le doyen de la Faculté de droit de l’Université d’Alberta. D’autres membres sont élus par les membres du conseil nommés. Toute demande de renseignement doit être adressée au: Responsable de la documentation Institut canadien du droit des ressources Murray Fraser Hall, Room 3353 (MFH 3353) University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 Téléphone: (403) 220-3200 Facsimilé: (403) 282-6182 C. élec: [email protected] Website: www.cirl.ca iv ♦ Defining Aboriginal Rights to Water in Alberta CIRL Occasional Paper #29 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. ix 1.0. Tracing the Origin of the Rights to Water: Aboriginal Title and Aboriginal Rights ................................................................................................2 1.1. Aboriginal Title: The Nature and Scope of the Right to Water ...................4 1.2. Aboriginal Rights: The Nature and Scope of the Rights to Water ..............8 2.0. The Impact of the Alberta Treaties on Aboriginal Water Rights ..........11 2.1. The Alberta Numbered Treaties .................................................................12 2.2. The Spirit and Intent of the Treaties ..........................................................12 2.2.1. The Written Terms of the Alberta Treaties .................................12 2.2.2. The Rules of Interpretation of Treaties .......................................15 2.2.3. The True Spirit and Intent of the Alberta Treaties ......................16 2.3. Were the Aboriginal Rights to Water Ceded or Extinguished by Treaty? ..................................................................................................18 2.4. What is the Nature and Scope of the Rights to Water Reserved by Treaties .......................................................................................................21 2.4.1. On Traditional Territories and on Indian Reserves: Right to a Livelihood ............................................................................21 2.4.2. On Reserve Lands .......................................................................22 2.5. Scope and Priority of the Rights ................................................................28 3.0. The Impact of Federal Water Legislation: The North-west Irrigation Act of 1894 ........................................................................................32 4.0. The Impact of the Natural Resources Transfer Agreement (NRTA) ....36 5.0. Conclusion ..........................................................................................................41 CIRL Publications ..............................................................................................................43 Defining Aboriginal Rights to Water in Alberta ♦ v CIRL Occasional Paper #29 vi ♦ Defining Aboriginal Rights to Water in Alberta CIRL Occasional Paper #29 Executive Summary This report explores some fundamental questions in relation to the water rights of Aboriginal peoples in Alberta. Aboriginal peoples have long asserted that water is essential to life. They view water as the lifeblood of the earth. The perceived threat to the health and integrity of river systems is a threat to their own integrity and survival. They share growing concerns over the future of water supplies in Alberta with non-Aboriginal peoples. They affirm that they have fundamental rights with respect to water, along with responsibilities to ensure that the integrity of waters is protected, responsibilities which they want to share with government and all water users. There is uncertainty concerning the nature and extent of Aboriginal rights to water, both on reserve and off-reserve. The report addresses only some of the questions that arise in connection with this subject, namely the origin, nature and scope of the rights. The main question that we seek to answer is whether Aboriginal peoples in Alberta can claim rights to water, and if so, what is the status of these rights by comparison with other provincially recognized water rights. To begin with, we trace the origin of the Aboriginal rights to water. Do Aboriginal title and Aboriginal rights, which are typically described in relation to “land”, include rights to water? If so, what is the nature and scope of these rights? We then examine the impact of the 19th century Alberta treaties on these rights. Have Aboriginal rights to water been ceded or surrendered by treaty? Have they been reserved? Have they been modified? What is the nature and what is the scope of these rights? We suggest that the treaties did not extinguish Aboriginal rights to water, which were essential to the common intention of the parties
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 7: JRP SIR 69A Cultural Effects Review

    Appendix 7: JRP SIR 69A Cultural Effects Review

    October 2013 SHELL CANADA ENERGY Appendix 7: JRP SIR 69a Cultural Effects Review Submitted to: Shell Canada Energy Project Number: 13-1346-0001 REPORT APPENDIX 7: JRP SIR 69a CULTURAL EFFECTS REVIEW Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Report Structure .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Overview of Findings ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Shell’s Approach to Community Engagement ..................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Shell’s Support for Cultural Initiatives .................................................................................................................. 7 1.6 Key Terms ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.6.1 Traditional Knowledge .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.6.2 Traditional
  • Obvious but Invisible: Ways of Knowing Health, Environment, and Colonialism in a West Coast Indigenous Community

    Obvious but Invisible: Ways of Knowing Health, Environment, and Colonialism in a West Coast Indigenous Community

    Comparative Studies in Society and History 2018;60(2):241–273. 0010-4175/18 # Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2018 doi:10.1017/S001041751800004X Obvious but Invisible: Ways of Knowing Health, Environment, and Colonialism in a West Coast Indigenous Community PAIGE RAIBMON Department of History, University of British Columbia PRELUDE I: ABIRDS- EYE VIEW This is a story about divergent epistemologies and the politics of risk. It is a story about diverse ways of knowing a place, of sensing danger, of feeling well; a story about the production of imperception, the construction of colonial subjecthood, and the struggle for Indigenous sovereignty. In this story, an Indigenous community worked to render perceptible to the settler state appara- tus its knowledge claims about pollution, health, and critically, authority. Activ- ists initially pursued an anti-colonial, environmental justice campaign that sought to translate local, Indigenous ways of knowing into the epistemologies of environmental science and public health. This strategy earned them allies in the health science and legal professions, and activists had reason for optimism. Yet ultimately, this strategy failed. When it did, the community changed course: it now appropriated technologies of law rather than science. Where they previ- ously mobilized knowledge verifiable with bare human senses, they now Acknowledgments: I humbly acknowledge the many people whose generosity, assistance, and insights made this piece possible. Most importantly, I thank the Mowachaht and Muchalaht com- munity members who spoke and worked with me, especially but not only: Sheila Savey, Margarita James, Margaret Amos, Jerry Jack, Max Savey, Lillian Howard, and Mike Maquinna.
  • Compensation After Delgamuukw Aboriginal Title’S Inescapable Economic Component

    Compensation After Delgamuukw Aboriginal Title’S Inescapable Economic Component

    Compensation after Delgamuukw Aboriginal Title’s Inescapable Economic Component MICHAEL J. MCDONALD AND THOMAS LUTES Introduction As any observer of recent Canadian news can attest, aboriginal issues in Canada are once again atop the public and media agenda. The range of issues in the public eye is remarkable: from the applicability of sales tax to New Brunswick’s aboriginal peoples; to the return of traditional lands to the First Nation at Ipperwash, Ontario; to the unprecedented fusion of aboriginal healing circles and the Canadian justice system in British Columbia’s Bishop O’Connor case. While such stories ride the crest of the latest wave of national media attention, the land claims process in British Columbia remains some- what adrift following the December 1997 Delgamuukw decision. The im- plications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Delgamuukw that aboriginal title exists and contains an “economic component” poses a tre- mendous challenge to government, private industry and First Nations. In particular, the Crown faces judgment for its action—or inaction—in Notes will be found on page 450. 425 426 Beyond the Nass Valley resolving land and resource claims, not only in our courts of law but also in the forum of public opinion, with its jury of voting citizens. The scenarios of economic doom voiced by a few politicians and public commentators since Delgamuukw was handed down have not al- layed British Columbians’ understandable concerns about the practical effects on their lives and on the effect of compensation to First Nations on the provincial economy. The entire land base of British Columbia is not about to be transferred to British Columbia’s First Nations, and the entire provincial budget for the next quarter-century will not be direct- ed to compensating the Province’s aboriginal peoples.
  • Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta Community Profiles

    Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta Community Profiles

    For additional copies of the Community Profiles, please contact: Indigenous Relations First Nations and Metis Relations 10155 – 102 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4G8 Phone: 780-644-4989 Fax: 780-415-9548 Website: www.indigenous.alberta.ca To call toll-free from anywhere in Alberta, dial 310-0000. To request that an organization be added or deleted or to update information, please fill out the Guide Update Form included in the publication and send it to Indigenous Relations. You may also complete and submit this form online. Go to www.indigenous.alberta.ca and look under Resources for the correct link. This publication is also available online as a PDF document at www.indigenous.alberta.ca. The Resources section of the website also provides links to the other Ministry publications. ISBN 978-0-7785-9870-7 PRINT ISBN 978-0-7785-9871-8 WEB ISSN 1925-5195 PRINT ISSN 1925-5209 WEB Introductory Note The Metis Settlements and First Nations in Alberta: Community Profiles provide a general overview of the eight Metis Settlements and 48 First Nations in Alberta. Included is information on population, land base, location and community contacts as well as Quick Facts on Metis Settlements and First Nations. The Community Profiles are compiled and published by the Ministry of Indigenous Relations to enhance awareness and strengthen relationships with Indigenous people and their communities. Readers who are interested in learning more about a specific community are encouraged to contact the community directly for more detailed information. Many communities have websites that provide relevant historical information and other background.
  • President's Report.Indd

    President's Report.Indd

    MÉTIS RIGHTS UPDATE Métis Nation of Alberta Annual General Assembly Métis Rights Update August 2016 This past year we have seen some exciting changes and developments - both provincially and nationally - that we hope will lead to signifi cant progress and new mandates and negotiations on Métis rights and outstanding claims here in Alberta. From the election of the Liberal party as the new federal Government and commitments identifi ed in their “Métis Policy Platform” to the historic Supreme Court of Canada ruling in Daniels v. Canada to the report by Canada’s Ministerial Special Representative on Métis Section 35 Rights which pioneers groundbreaking recommendations, we have many exciting and new opportunities available to us that we must seize on in order to advance our Métis rights agenda. In order to be successful though, we must work - together. The MNA is the government of the Métis Nation in Alberta and has the clear mandate to deal with outstanding Métis rights and claims for all Métis in this province. Our Locals, Regions and Provincial Council must work together to eff ectively represent all Alberta Métis. We are one Métis Nation - one Métis people. We must advance our rights on that basis. And, we will, by working - together. This document has been developed to provide the MNA Annual General Assembly with an update on what has happened over the last year with respect to Métis rights, what the MNA is currently working on with respect to Métis rights and what is on the horizon for the remainder of 2016 and 2017. Page 3 | Métis Nation
  • Indigenous Perspectives Collection Bora Laskin Law Library

    Indigenous Perspectives Collection Bora Laskin Law Library

    fintFenvir Indigenous Perspectives Collection Bora Laskin Law Library 2009-2019 B O R A L A S K I N L A W L IBRARY , U NIVERSITY OF T O R O N T O F A C U L T Y O F L A W 21 things you may not know about the Indian Act / Bob Joseph KE7709.2 .J67 2018. Course Reserves More Information Aboriginal law / Thomas Isaac. KE7709 .I823 2016 More Information The... annotated Indian Act and aboriginal constitutional provisions. KE7704.5 .A66 Most Recent in Course Reserves More Information Aboriginal autonomy and development in northern Quebec and Labrador / Colin H. Scott, [editor]. E78 .C2 A24 2001 More Information Aboriginal business : alliances in a remote Australian town / Kimberly Christen. GN667 .N6 C47 2009 More Information Aboriginal Canada revisited / Kerstin Knopf, editor. E78 .C2 A2422 2008 More Information Aboriginal child welfare, self-government and the rights of indigenous children : protecting the vulnerable under international law / by Sonia Harris-Short. K3248 .C55 H37 2012 More Information Aboriginal conditions : research as a foundation for public policy / edited by Jerry P. White, Paul S. Maxim, and Dan Beavon. E78 .C2 A2425 2003 More Information Aboriginal customary law : a source of common law title to land / Ulla Secher. KU659 .S43 2014 More Information Aboriginal education : current crisis and future alternatives / edited by Jerry P. White ... [et al.]. E96.2 .A24 2009 More Information Aboriginal education : fulfilling the promise / edited by Marlene Brant Castellano, Lynne Davis, and Louise Lahache. E96.2 .A25 2000 More Information Aboriginal health : a constitutional rights analysis / Yvonne Boyer.
  • The Difficulties of Combating Inequality in Time

    The Difficulties of Combating Inequality in Time

    The Difficulties of Combating Inequality in Time Jane Jenson, Francesca Polletta & Paige Raibmon Abstract: Scholars have argued that disadvantaged groups face an impossible choice in their efforts to win policies capable of diminishing inequality: whether to emphasize their sameness to or difference from the advantaged group. We analyze three cases from the 1980s and 1990s in which reformers sought to avoid that dilemma and assert groups’ sameness and difference in novel ways: in U.S. policy on bio- medical research, in the European Union’s initiatives on gender equality, and in Canadian law on Indig- enous rights. In each case, however, the reforms adopted ultimately reproduced the sameness/difference dilemma rather than transcended it. To explain why, we show how profound disagreements about both the histories of the groups included in the policy and the place of the policy in a longer historical trajec- tory of reform either went unrecognized or were actively obscured. Targeted groups came to be attribut- ed a biological or timeless essence, not because this was inevitable, we argue, but because of these fail- ures to historicize inequality. Efforts to legislate or judicially confirm rights to equality often prove disappointing, even for those with clear-eyed aspirations. There are many rea- sons for the gap between the aspiration and the re- sult, but a deceptively simple one is that political actors define equality in ways that restrict its scope and substance. On some accounts, the problem can be characterized in terms of the sameness/differ- jane jenson is Professor Em- ence dilemma.1 Equality sometimes has been de- erita of Political Science at the fined as meaning that members of the disadvan- Université de Montréal.
  • History of First Nations People in Alberta

    History of First Nations People in Alberta

    Conversation Guide History of First Nations People in Alberta Big Idea: First Nations have a rich history. Their References relationship with the land has continued to evolve The Canadian Encyclopedia http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca since contact with Europeans. Despite attempts to assimilate, and diminish their culture, the Indigenous First Nations in Alberta people in this area known as Alberta have helped to https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100020670/11001 shape the provinces diverse identity over time. 00020675 Essential Terminology This conversation guide is designed for use https://www.teachers.ab.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/ATA/ by instructional leaders and learning Publications/Human-Rights-Issues/Terminology%20%20%2 8PD-WT-16a%29.pdf communities or as a self-paced study. A Long History First Nations history in Alberta dates back at least 11,000 years and approximately 500 generations.The Milk River that runs through Writing-On-Stone Provincial Park in Alberta contains the largest concentration of First Nation petroglyphs (rock carvings) and pictographs (rock paintings) on the great plains of North America. Evidence like the rock carvings and a 10,000 year old spearhead found in Athabasca prove a lengthy and well established way of life for the First Nations in Alberta. First Nation Life Before the Arrival of Europeans Prior to the arrival of Europeans in North America, the land provided the First Nations with everything they required for their mental, physical, spiritual and emotional well being. Everything in nature was seen as living; therefore, First Nations people respected and took care of the land around them. The land took care of the First Nations by continually growing herbs and plants for healing and providing the wildlife they needed to survive.
  • Bigstone Cree Nation How Smart Planning and Quality Data of Helped One Alberta First Nation Transform DATA Its Reputation for Sickness to Success

    Bigstone Cree Nation How Smart Planning and Quality Data of Helped One Alberta First Nation Transform DATA Its Reputation for Sickness to Success

    THE POWER Bigstone Cree Nation How smart planning and quality data OF helped one Alberta First Nation transform DATA its reputation for sickness to success BIGSTONE CREE NATION – If you drive north out of Edmonton, up past the boundless farmer’s fields, over the historic Athabasca River and right to the end of Highway 813, you’ll find yourself in Bigstone Cree Nation. Located in the heart of the Albertan oil sands, about four hours from the provincial capital, there’s no arguing that this beautiful and remote First Nations community is out-of-the-way—but that doesn’t mean it’s off-the-grid. Made up of a total of seven communities that house more than 3,000 residents on about 21,000 hectares of pristine lake-rich Northern boreal forest, this sprawling Woodland Cree community is home to a wealth of services and facilities. This includes its own hospital, health-care centre, home-care program and school, to hotels, restaurants, gyms, a beach and a full-service hockey arena. There’s even a nearby golf course. FNIGC’s Addie Pryce, Principal Christine Gullion and Andy Alook pose in Oski Pasikoniwew Kamik School, At the centre of all this is Wabasca, the geographic Bigstone’s Community School in Wabasca and administrative heart of Bigstone’s cluster of communities. Though it’s derived from the Cree who do house calls; we also have a lot of our own word wapuskau, which means “white rapids” (in businesses. We provide everything to our members. reference to a nearby river) Wabasca’s name could So, yes, we’ve seen a lot of change over the years, just as easily be interpreted as “where it all happens.” but it didn’t happen overnight.
  • Court File No

    Court File No

    S.C.C. FILE NO. 38734 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA) BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN APPELLANT (Appellant) - and - RICHARD LEE DESAUTEL RESPONDENT (Respondent) - and - ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW BRUNSWICK, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE YUKON TERRITORY, PESKOTOMUHKATI NATION, INDIGENOUS BAR ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, WHITECAP DAKOTA FIRST NATION, GRAND COUNCIL OF THE CREES (EEYOU ISTCHEE) AND CREE NATION, GOVERNMENT, OKANAGAN NATION ALLIANCE, MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KAHNAWÀ:KE, ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS, MÉTIS NATIONAL COUNCIL AND MANITOBA MÉTIS FEDERATION INC., NUCHATLAHT FIRST NATION, CONGRESS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES, LUMMI NATION, and MÉTIS NATION BRITISH COLUMBIA INTERVENERS REPLY FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT, RICHARD LEE DESAUTEL, TO INTERVENERS’ FACTUMS (Pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada and Order of Cȏté J. made June 30, 2020) Arvay Finlay LLP Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP 1512 – 808 Nelson Street 160 Elgin Street, Suite 2600 Box 12149, Nelson Square Ottawa ON K1P 1C3 Vancouver BC V6Z 2H2 Tel: 613.786.0171 / Fax: 613.788.3587 Tel: 604.696.9828 Email: [email protected] Fax: 1.888.575.3281 Jeffrey W. Beedell Email: [email protected] Ottawa Agent for Counsel for the [email protected] Respondent, Richard Lee Desautel Mark G. Underhill and Kate R. Phipps Counsel for the Respondent, Richard Lee Desautel Attorney General of British Columbia Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Legal Services Branch 1300 – 100 Queen Street 1405 Douglas Street, 3rd Floor Ottawa ON K1P 1J9 Victoria BC V8W 2G2 Tel: 613.369.4795 Tel: 250.387.0417 Fax: 613.230.8842 Fax: 250.387.0343 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Karen Perron Glen R.
  • Treaty 4 Treaty 6 Treaty 7 Treaty 8 Treaty 10

    Treaty 4 Treaty 6 Treaty 7 Treaty 8 Treaty 10

    Smith’s Landing First Nation TREATY 4 Dene Tha’ Mikisew First Nation MNA TREATY 6 Cree Lake REGION 6 Nation Athabasca TREATY 7 Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Beaver First Nation TREATY 8 Little Red River Cree Nation Tallcree MNA TREATY 10 First REGION 1 Nation MNA Fort McKay Métis PADDLE PRAIRIE REGION 5 First Nation Settlements MNA Regional Zones Peerless/ Lubicon Lake Loon River First Nation Trout Lake Fort McMurray Métis Nation of Nation (No Reserve) First Nation Alberta (MNA) Woodland Cree Association First Nation Whitefi sh Lake Fort McMurray First Nation Bigstone Cree First Nation Cities and Towns (Atikameg) Nation GIFT LAKE Kapawe’no First Nation Chipewyan Duncan’s Prairie First First Nation PEAVINE Nation Sucker Creek Sawridge Grande First Nation Lesser Slave Lake First Nation Horse Lake Prairie First Nation EAST PRAIRIE Swan Heart Lake River First Nation Sturgeon Lake Driftpile First BUFFALO LAKE Nation Cree Nation First Nation Beaver Cold KIKINO Lake Cree Lake First Nation Nation Whitefi sh Lake First MNA N a t i o n ( G o o d fi s h ) Kehewin ELIZABETH REGION 4 Alexander First Nation First Nation Michel First Saddle Lake Alexis Nakota Sioux First Nation Nation Frog Lake First Nation First Nation Edmonton Paul First Nation Papaschase First Nation (Edmonton) FISHING Enoch Cree Nation Ermineskin Cree NationLAKE Louis Bull Tribe LANGUAGE GROUPING OF Jasper Samson MNA FIRST NATIONS IN ALBERTA Montana Cree Nation Cree Nation Alexis Nakota REGION 2 Sioux First Nation Cree O’Chiese First Nation Dene Sunchild First Red Deer Stoney Nation Cree/Saulteaux Nation Big Horn Stoney/Nakoda/Sioux (Wesley)* Blackfoot Stoney Nation Banff Chiniki (Morley) *Although the Big Horn (Wesley) First Nation land is in Treaty 6 territory, it is a signatory of Treaty 7 and part Calgary of the Stoney Nation.
  • Trauma, Child Development, Healing and Resilience a Review of Literature with Focus on Indigenous Peoples and Communities

    Trauma, Child Development, Healing and Resilience a Review of Literature with Focus on Indigenous Peoples and Communities

    Trauma, Child Development, Healing and Resilience A Review of Literature with Focus on Indigenous Peoples and Communities Prepared by: Dr. Patti LaBoucane-Benson Dr. Nicole Sherren Dr. Deanna Yerichuk Trauma, Child Development, Healing and Resilience A Review of Literature with Focus on Aboriginal Peoples and Communities Primary Contributors Dr. Patti LaBoucane-Benson, Dr. Nicole Sherren, Dr. Deanna Yerichuk Project Sponsors Alberta Children Services, Cultural Knowledge and Innovation Branch Suggested Citation LaBoucane-Benson, P., Sherren, N., Yerichuk, D. (2017). Trauma, Child Development, Healing and Resilience: A review of literature with focus on Indigenous peoples and communities. PolicyWise for Children & Families. Edmonton, Alberta. PolicyWise for Children & Families | 1 Trauma, Child Development, Healing and Resilience A Review of Literature with Focus on Aboriginal Peoples and Communities Table of Contents Key Messages ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 21 Research Design and Method ..................................................................................................................... 23 Annotated