Guiding Principles Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

guiding principles contents 3 index 20 culling 5 preamble 20 domestic animals 20 domesticated pet animal 7 statements of principle 20 domestication 8 key principles 20 ecological sustainability 10 climate change 20 ecosystem services 10 community engagement 21 euthanasia 11 community animals 21 exotic (non-native) animal 12 wild animals 21 exotic pets/wild pets 14 food and farmed animals 21 farmed animals 21 feral animals 15 working animals 21 food animals 15 the use of animals in science 21 humane and in medical and non-medical 21 imperiled species preparations 21 intensive livestock farming 15 invasive alien species 22 inhumane 22 intrinsic value 17 key definitions 22 introduced species 18 animal 22 introduced alien species 18 animal welfare 22 invasive animals 18 animal welfare frameworks 22 livelihoods 18 banner principles 22 performing animals 18 biodiversity 22 pest 19 biological sustainability 22 pet animals 19 climate change 22 precautionary principle 19 community 23 sentience 19 community animals 23 sustainable use of nature 19 community engagement (including animals) 19 companion animals 23 taming 19 conservation 23 therapy animals 19 cruelty 23 training animals 23 unethical hunting 23 wild animal 23 working animals © Jessica Boklan 2 International Fund for Animal Welfare 3 Guiding principles animals and people thriving together preamble In order to achieve IFAW’s vision of Conservation decisions should to protecting wild animals and their animals and people thriving together, be guided by full consideration of habitats from human harm, whether we follow key principles in our work. ecological sustainability, biological caused intentionally or unintentionally. sustainability, and the precautionary Responsible human behavior should Conservation policy should be based principle. prevent, avoid, or at the very least, on sound science within an ethical minimize direct and indirect harm to framework that recognizes the Humans have a moral responsibility all animals. intrinsic value of individual animals to provide for the needs of those and species, and the welfare needs of animals who are dependent on animals as sentient beings. them. This responsibility extends 4 International Fund for Animal Welfare © Scott Anger x IFAW 5 Guiding principles Section 1 statements of principle 6 International Fund for Animal Welfare 7 Guiding principles © IFAW/Donal Boyd key principles animal welfare no matter what the perceived intrinsic value precautionary principle sentience sustainable use benefits might be, as outlined in IFAW supports sustainable use, in Animal welfare is both a science the Banner Principles. The notion of intrinsic value is shared In the face of scientific uncertainty The quality of life and suffering principle, as long as it is truly and a philosophical position. by many conservation and animal and contested information, IFAW animals experience is of moral ecologically and biologically Animal welfare science endeavors welfare communities. applies a precautionary approach to concern. Animals are sentient beings sustainable, as well as equitable and to provide objective assessments biological sustainability making decisions about conservation and, as such, their welfare should be humane and complies with the of the physical and mental Conservation’s traditional concern is and animal welfare interventions. integrated when formulating and Precautionary Principle. wellbeing of animals in relation to In order to ensure biological for the intrinsic value of species, IFAW believes that alternatives to implementing policy. Good welfare the quality and suitability of sustainability, populations of living habitats and ecosystems. potentially harmful actions must be (physical and mental wellbeing) is not environments they are in. When organisms should not be so heavily identified and prioritized, with the the just the absence of pain and justifying our treatment of and exploited or otherwise compromised Animal welfare’s traditional concern burden of proof placed on those suffering, positive experiences and effect on animals, we must that they decline to levels or is about the intrinsic value of proposing a decision that may cause emotions are critical to ‘a life worth consider why an action is conditions from which they cannot individuals. harm, whether by action or inaction. living’, one of the defining criteria for necessary and how it will affect naturally recover. good welfare. the animals. An animal welfare IFAW believes that all life has intrinsic philosophical position requires value. Individual animals, populations, science and ethics form that any use of an animal must be ecological sustainability species and the ecosystems in which the basis of policy justified and that justification must they live all have worth, for their own balance the ‘benefit’ to wider Ecological sustainability is vital for the sake, independent of their usefulness The process of science builds society against the ‘cost’ to the wellbeing of life on Earth and must be to humans. knowledge. Scientific knowledge, individual animal. There are limits the foremost objective in considered in an ethical framework, to what we should do to animals conservation. guides decision-making. 8 International Fund for Animal Welfare 9 Guiding principles community animals IFAW recognizes the value of the control of community mutilations of domesticated relationships people have with animal population animals domesticated (community) animals The wholesale killing of community IFAW opposes the mutilation of any for companionship and livelihoods, animals such as cats and dogs is not body part of an animal when it is done and the important role these animals an acceptable or effective method of for any reason other than the play in human communities. The population or disease control. protection of the animal’s health or for health and welfare of community Problems associated with population, fertility control in cats and dogs. In animals is integral to the health and behaviors and disease in these such instances, the procedure must wellbeing of humans, our animals must be addressed through be performed by a skilled veterinarian climate change community communities, wildlife and the community-wide acceptance of who ensures best practices. environment. Community animals responsibilities governing the must be provided with the resources existence, safety, and wellbeing of training of domesticated engagement and care they need to safeguard their these animals. Research shows that animals own wellbeing and to ensure they do spay/neuter and vaccination programs IFAW supports positive training Climate change has profound implications for individual Through community engagement, IFAW aims to not pose a danger to people, or wild are far more effective than culling at methods that reward animals for animals, populations and their habitats. In recognition of strengthen and nurture the relationships between humans and/or domesticated animals. controlling population and disease. desired behaviors. the magnitude of this threat, IFAW believes that the nations and animals around the world. of the world have an obligation to endorse and implement breeding of domesticated euthanasia the Paris Agreement and reduce greenhouse gas The lives of communities, the animals in their care and the animals When it is apparent that the quality of emissions to decrease effects of climate change. wildlife around them are inextricably linked through the The breeding of domestic animals life of an individual animal is, or will Individuals and communities can play their parts by habitats, shared resources and the interactions they have. comes with responsibility to ensure likely be, unacceptably compromised, As residents of the Philippines braced for the imminent eruption of reducing their carbon footprints through lifestyle changes IFAW is committed to respectful and inclusive engagement the wellbeing of the parent animals and this cannot be remedied or the Mayon volcano, IFAW helped to help alleviate pressure animals face due to climate that empowers communities to identify opportunities to and the offspring. This applies to prevented, euthanasia may be in the evacuate around 300 animals (water buffalo and cattle) from the danger change. address important wildlife conservation issues while immediate care, individual welfare, best interests of the animal. zone to temporary shelters. incorporating animal welfare considerations. and genetic health of the lineage or species. 10 International Fund for Animal Welfare 11 Guiding principles wild animals culling and pest control not therefore be kept in captivity financial gains over the risk for rapid conservation funding to replace determination of rights, powers and wild animals in sport The cruel and inhumane treatment of because of their complex social or species depletion, as there is no existing income streams that rely on obligations in relation to resource and entertainment animals under the guise of culling or environmental requirements. In inducement to preserve or sustain trophy hunting. allocation and management should be Wild animals should not be used for pest control is not acceptable. If particular, the keeping of wild animals populations. conducted within a co-management/ sport or entertainment in any manner animals are considered a nuisance as pets can be especially problematic hunting imperiled species community-based management that is inherently distressing or cruel because they damage property or as it is largely unregulated, creates
Recommended publications
  • Bioethical Questions of Animals in Sport1

    Bioethical Questions of Animals in Sport1

    Preliminary communication UDK: 17:798/799 636.046:17 Bruno Ćurko (Croatia) Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split [email protected] BIOETHICAL QUESTIONS OF ANIMALS IN SPORT1 Abstract Animals are a part of sport industries, from the so-called traditions such as fox hunting and bullfighting, horse and dog racing, to the cruel examples of hare coursing, rodeo, and orangutan boxing (Thailand), to cock and dog fights. These are prominent examples of animal exploitation serving our human entertainment. In my presentation, I will try to identify some of the essential questions considering animal use in sports. Some of these questions are: Can we justify animal exploitation in the name of tradition? Can we take into consideration the well-being of sport animals before, during, and after their competitive career? How much could and should the imminent risk of animal stress, injuries, and fatalities prevent us from their exploitation in sports? If animals are ready to obey demands we set upon them, should we abuse them for our entertainment and sport? Keywords: animals, sports industry, cultural tradition, bioethics, entertainment 1 This paper is an elaborated adaptation of a lecture titled “Bioethical Questions of Animals in Sport”, presented at the conference “3rd Osijek days of bioethics” - Faculty of Education, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 11–12 November 2019. Pannoniana, vol. IV, no. I (2020): 143-153 Introduction When we think about animals in sport, we usually think about activities where people use animals in some competitions such as horse races, dog races, and other similar ones. But first, we need to research the definition of sport as it is.
  • The Use of Animals in Sports

    The Use of Animals in Sports

    Existence, Breeding, a,nd Rights: The Use of Animals in Sports Donald Scherer Bowling Green State University Against these lines of argument one frequently encounters a certain objection. It is argued that since the animals for fighting, hunting and racing exist only because they have been bred for such human uses, human beings are justified in so treating them. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate this line ofobjection, or to speak more precisely, to evaluate the two distinct objections implicit in this line. For the objection may be either that (l) the present uses of the animals are justified because they are better for the animals than the Standardly, philosophical arguments about the alternative, namely non-existence, or that quality of treatment human beings owe nonhuman animals! rest on two bases. Peter Singer is famous (2) breeding an animal for a purpose gives the for arguing from the capacity of animals to feel pain breeders (transferable) rights over what they to the conclusion that since almost none of the pain have bred. human beings cause animals is necessary, almost none of it is morally justifiable (Singer, 1989, pp. 78-79). I shall pursue these alternatives sequentially. Singer rests his case on the premise that who suffers pain does not affect the badness of the suffering, so The Value of Existence that, without strong justification, the infliction of pain is universally wrong (Ibid., pp. 77-78). Tom Regan is The strength ofthe first form ofthe objection rests on equally famous for his argument that the beliefs and a common intuition comparing the values of existence desires which normal one year-old mammals clearly and non-existence.
  • GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Focus on Hungary's Presidency

    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Focus on Hungary's Presidency

    WHITEHALL • WESTMINSTER • BELFAST • EDINBURGH • CARDIFF • EUROPE • INTERNATIONAL EUROPEAN EDITIONGOVERNMENT GAZETTE Focus on Hungary's Presidency November 2010 £10.00, €11.00 ISSN 2042-4167 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE November 2010 GOVERNMENT The Hungarian Foreign Minister sets out the aims and objectives of Hungary's EU Presidency Democracy Foreign Policy Redevelopment Environment Jerzy Buzek on Knut Fleckenstein Danuta Huebner Gunther its promotion discusses Brussels' outlines plans to Oettinger around the world relationship with redevelop central lays out his Russia and eastern Europe priorities Gov Gazette Nov Europe cover proof.indd 1 29/10/2010 12:57:35 Shrinking budgets but increasing service demands? Do you face the difficult challenge of maintaining or improving services while reducing costs? Atos Origin can help you ease the pressure on your staff, enabling them to focus on delivery. We do this by optimizing your existing infrastructure and processes to deliver greater efficiency, superior service and lower costs. Atos Origin. Helping you achieve more. For more information: www.atosorigin.com/achievemore [email protected] www.atosorigin.com ATE_Public&Health_Advert_10-10703.indd 1 10/28/2010 4:18:11 PM WHITEHALL • WESTMINSTER • BELFAST • EDINBURGH • CARDIFF • EUROPE • INTERNATIONAL EUROPEAN EDITIONG G Focus on Hungary's Presidency OVERNMENT AZETTE November 2010 £10.00, €11.00 ISSN 2042-4167 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Focus: Hungary's EU Presidency The Hungarian Foreign Minister sets out the aims and objectives of Hungary's EU Presidency
  • 1 ANIMALS, SPORT, and the ENVIRONMENT Kass Gibson

    1 ANIMALS, SPORT, and the ENVIRONMENT Kass Gibson

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Plymouth Marjon University Repository ANIMALS, SPORT, AND THE ENVIRONMENT Kass Gibson 1 Purpose – To outline the multiple ways in which animals are inserted into sporting practices, outline historical and contemporary approaches to studying human-animal sporting practices, and advocate for the centring of sociological problems in human- animal research in sporting contexts and cultures and for considering such problems in relation to environmental issues. Design/methodology/approach -- In the first part of the chapter, conceptual differentiation of animals in the animal-sport complex is presented. Subsequently, studies of interspecies sport are reviewed with reference to the ‘animal turn’ in the literature. In the second part, a critique is presented relating to: i) the privileging of companion animals, especially dogs and horses, which overlooks the multiple ways animals are integrated into (multispecies) sport; ii) micro-sociological and insider ethnographies of companionship displacing of sociological problems in favour of relationship perspectives; and iii) the environment as absent from analysis. The conclusion offers implications for understanding multispecies sport and the environment. Findings -- I chart a general shift in emphasis and focus from animals as an ‘absent- presence’ in pursuit of sociological knowledge towards a clearly defined focus on interspecies sport as a field of research characterised by investigations of relationships with companion animals through the ‘animal turn.’ Research limitations/implications – The focus on companion species means other animals (i.e., non-companions) are understudied, big picture sociological questions are often side-lined, environmental concerns marginalised, and sociological understanding of the environment more generally is either ignored or reduced to a conduit of human-animal interactions.
  • MANIFESTO for ANIMALS General Election 2020

    MANIFESTO for ANIMALS General Election 2020

    THE IRISH SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS MANIFESTO for ANIMALS General Election 2020 MakeMake youryour votevote countcount forfor animalanimal welfarewelfare OurOur vision:vision: ToTo endend crueltycruelty toto animalsanimals inin IrelandIreland #GE2020#GE2020 #ISPCA#ISPCA WWW.ISPCA.IE MANIFESTO FOR ANIMALS Why you should vote in the general election Animal welfare is an important societal issue. With the General Election to be held on 8th February 2020, you will have an opportunity to vote for those candidates that support animal welfare. Your vote can make a difference. By asking candidates their views on key animal welfare issues you can gauge their support, raise the profile of these issues, and help to promote animal welfare through the course of the next government. We have listed below key animal welfare issues in Ireland today and have listed the actions we would like to see the next government take to continue the improvements to animal welfare achieved over the course of the previous government. The ISPCA cares about the welfare of all animals including pet animals, horses and donkeys, farm animals, wild animals and animals used in sport, entertainment and science. To find out more about the ISPCA please visit www.ispca.ie KEY ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUES Education Education is the key to improving animal welfare in Ireland. The ISPCA calls on the government to introduce an animal welfare module to National School Curriculum with a focus on responsible pet ownership and to give students an understanding of their moral and legal responsibilities to animals for which they are responsible. The impact of such education would be generational and will reduce the levels of suffering witnessed by the ISPCA.
  • Law Enforcement Takes Legal Action Angell to the Rescue

    Law Enforcement Takes Legal Action Angell to the Rescue

    SPRING/SUMMER 2010 MSPCA.ORG 350 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130 Non-profit Org. U.S. Postage PAID MSPCA/Angell The mission of the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals–Angell Animal Medical Center is to protect animals, relieve their suffering, advance their health and welfare, prevent cruelty, and work for a just and compassionate society. GOOD NEWS! ADOPTIONS UP EVEN IN DOWN ECONOMY ANGELL TO Please Will You Be Our Fan? Can You See into the Future? THE RESCUE Do you and your friends enjoy connecting with each You don’t need a crystal ball to know that animals will always need our OBSERVANT OWNERS, other on Facebook? If so, please become an official help. We’ve been helping them, with the support of friends like you, since 1868. VIGILANT VETS Fan of the MSPCA–Angell page. MSPCA at Nevins Farm has its own Facebook page too, as do Please, as you make your estate plans, consider a bequest to the our MSPCA Animal Action Team and The American MSPCA–Angell as a fitting continuation of your lifelong love for animals. And when you do, please let us know! We’d like to invite you Fondouk. All our pages are updated frequently and into our Circle of Friends and acknowledge your thoughtful concern for the LAW filled with interesting news about animals and the future of our organization. By providing for the animals in your own people who love them. It’s yet another important way future plans, you become an essential member of our Society.
  • Bienestar Animal En Las Corridas De Toros, Por El Simple Hecho De Causarle Lesiones Y Consecuentemente La Muerte

    Bienestar Animal En Las Corridas De Toros, Por El Simple Hecho De Causarle Lesiones Y Consecuentemente La Muerte

    BIENESTAR ANIMAL EN L A S CORRIDAS DE TOROS Procuraduría Ambiental y del Ordenamiento Territorial de la CDMX México, 2017 DIRECTORIO Procurador Miguel Angel Cancino Aguilar Subprocuradora Ambiental, de Protección y Bienestar a los Animales Leticia Mejía Hernández Sobprocurador de Ordenamiento Territorial Emigdio Roa Márquez Subprocurador de Asuntos Jurídicos Marco Antonio Esquivel López Coordinadora Técnica y de Sistemas Gabriela Ortiz Merino Coordinador de Participación Ciudadana y Difusión Francisco A. Calderón Córdova Coordinadora Administrativa Oralia Reséndiz Márquez CONTENIDO ANTECEDENTES EN PAOT .................................................................................................................. 1 RECONOCIMIENTOS DE HECHOS ......................................................................................................... 1 DERECHO COMPARADO ........................................................................................................................ 3 LAS CORRIDAS DE TOROS EN LA CIUDAD DE MÉXICO ....................................................................15 DICTAMEN JURÍDICO SOBRE LA PROHIBICIÓN DE LA TAUROMAQUIA Y LAS RESTRICCIONES LEGÍTIMAS A DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES ....................................................................................20 ANÁLISIS TÉCNICO RESPECTO A LA CRUELDAD Y MALTRATO DURANTE LAS CORRIDAS DE TOROS ...................................................................................................................................................37 POSTURA DE LA
  • Imaging Animals

    Imaging Animals

    This file is part of the following reference: Dover, Barbara Ann (2008) Interrogating reciprocal gaze: the animal and human in contemporary art. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/17278 PART ONE: PERSPECTIVES ON ANIMALS AND HUMANS 1 CHAPTER ONE – INTRODUCTION 1.1 Companion Animals: The Pet Phenomenon Recent pet industry research indicates significant changes in pet ownership in that Americans now own more pets than ever with the highest level recorded of 62 per cent of all households owning a pet. In 2003, Americans kept 65 million dogs as pets (Dillon, 2005) and approximately 78 million cats with 34 per cent of households owning at least one cat (HSUS, 2005). In 2008, in the United Kingdom, 43 per cent of households owned a pet with 22 percent of these homes owning a dog, a total population of seven and a quarter million dogs. With cat ownership increasing in the United Kingdom, the total population of cats is over seven million with 18 per cent of households owning a cat (PFMA, 2008). Pet ownership is even higher in Australia; one of the highest in the world, 64 per cent of the seven and a half million households in Australia own pets (Petnet, 2003) with four million dogs and two and a half million cats (ABC, 2007). Of these, 91 per cent of pet owners reported feeling very close to their pet (Petnet, 2003). Households spend more on their pets than on child care. ABC (2007) notes that “… what we are witnessing is the rise of the ‘fur family’” (ABC, 2007).
  • An Evaluation of Portuguese Societal Opinion Towards the Practice of Bullfighting

    An Evaluation of Portuguese Societal Opinion Towards the Practice of Bullfighting

    animals Article An Evaluation of Portuguese Societal Opinion towards the Practice of Bullfighting Francisco Javier Diéguez 1,* , Yara Zau 2, Inés Viegas 3, Sara Fragoso 4,5, Patricia V. Turner 6,7 and Gonçalo da Graça-Pereira 4,8 1 Departamento de Anatomía, Producción Animal y Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Universitario s/n, 27002 Lugo, Spain 2 MYPZ—Farma&Vet, Av. Joaquim Agostinho 8; Loja B, Santa Cruz, 2560-065 A-Dos-Cunhados—Torres Vedras, Portugal; [email protected] 3 ICAAM–Mediterranean Institute of Agronomical and Environmental Sciences, Institute for Advanced Research and Formation, Évora University, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal; [email protected] 4 Centro Para o Conhecimento Animal. Av. Bombeiros Voluntários de Algés 40A, 1495-143 Algés, Portugal; [email protected] (S.F.); [email protected] (G.d.G.-P.) 5 LabCAP—Instituto Superior de Estudos Interculturais e Transdisciplinares (ISEIT), Instituto Piaget de Almada, Avenida Jorge Peixinho, 30 Quinta da Arreinela, 2805-059 Almada, Portugal 6 Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; [email protected] 7 Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA 01887, USA 8 Escola Superior Agraria de Elvas, Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre, Av. 14 de Janeiro 13, 7350-092 Elvas, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-9828-22400 Received: 29 July 2020; Accepted: 3 November 2020; Published: 7 November 2020 Simple Summary: Bullfighting is one of the most controversial topics in animal welfare and ethics in recent years. This activity is an issue at the forefront of many animal welfare organizations.
  • Exotic and Wild Animals for Public Display: an Unnecessary Entertainment

    Exotic and Wild Animals for Public Display: an Unnecessary Entertainment

    SUBMISSION102812 - (WSPA) EXOTIC AND WILD ANIMALS FOR PUBLIC DISPLAY: AN UNNECESSARY ENTERTAINMENT Appendix D World Society for the Protection of Animals 18 Heather Street, Parnell, Auckland June 2012 Page i SUBMISSION102812 - (WSPA) Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of paper .................................................................................................................................................. 1 WSPA’s proposals ................................................................................................................................................. 1 WSPA’s policy ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Circuses .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Ancient circuses .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Types of circus ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 The Barnum & Bailey / Moscow Circus type ...................................................................................................
  • 1 SYLLABUS Fall 2012: Animal Law Jay Tutchton Jtutchton

    1 SYLLABUS Fall 2012: Animal Law Jay Tutchton Jtutchton

    SYLLABUS Fall 2012: Animal Law Jay Tutchton [email protected] 720-301-3843 Mondays and Wednesdays, 9AM – 10:15 AM Room 170 TEXT: Animal Law: Cases and Materials, 4th Ed., Carolina Academic Press, Bruce A. Wagman, Sonia S. Waisman, Pamela D. Frasch (2010) ISBN: 978-1-59460-672-4 August 20th Introduction and Class Overview; What is an Animal? Text pp. 3-24, Knox, Garcia, Lock, Cleve. August 22nd “Domestic” and “Companion” Animals and “Livestock”, Text pp. 24-49, Levine, Park, Holcomb, Comella, Bueckner, Kyle. August 27th Property and Beyond: The Evolution of Rights, Text pp. 51-81, Slaves, Women, Children, Mental Incompetents, Potential Humans, Nonhumans. August 29th Criminal Law, Text pp. 83-99, Historical Perspective, P.K.B., State Anti- Cruelty Statutes, LaRue. September 5th Criminal Law, Con’t., Text pp. 99-137, Affirmative Acts of Cruelty, Bunt, Voelker, Dunn, Garcia, Mohler, Waters, Failure to Act, Youngblood, Schott, Martinez, Brian. September 10th Criminal Law, Con’t., Text pp. 137-167, Animals in Sport and Entertainment, Hunting, Boushehry, Rodeos, Animal Racing, Television, Film, Zoos, Thomason, Animal Fighting, Brackett, Ash, Hargrove. September 12th Criminal Law, Con’t., Text pp. 167-189, Other Animal Cruelty Issues, ALDF v. Woodley, Hammer v. AKC, West Hollywood, Cross-Protecting: The Link between Animal Abuse and Human Violence, Schambon, Thompson. September 17th Torts, Text pp. 191-223, Theories of Liability, Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, Rabideau, Liotta, Intentional Torts, Burgess, Fourth Amendment Claims, Product Liability, Pet Food Products Liability Litigation, Veterinary Malpractice, Brown. September 19th Torts, Con’t., Text 223-264, Damages and Valuation, La Porte, Corso, Brousseau, Johnson, Petco v.
  • COMPANION MSPCA-Angell Them in a Basement Covered with Raw Sewage

    COMPANION MSPCA-Angell Them in a Basement Covered with Raw Sewage

    MSPCA133 6/7/07 10:12 AM Page 1 Acupuncture for Dancin’ Feet Benefit One Adopted Dog Your Pet? Angell’s New Paws of Nantucket P4 Saves Another P3 Pain Medicine Service P2 Over Two Dozen Dachshunds Recover From Abuse and Find Safety at The MSPCA seized 29 Dachshunds after finding COMPANION MSPCA-Angell them in a basement covered with raw sewage. Thirty-four. That was the number of SPRING/SUMMER 2007 animals found imprisoned in the dark, cold basement of a northern Essex County home in the fall of 2006. Twenty-nine of those animals were Dachshunds. Mainly used for breeding purposes, these little In Memory, Honor dogs were found in deplorable conditions, including a sopping wet floor coated with or Celebration raw sewage. The Tributes Campaign enables supporters After a good cleaning, this photo was taken on the first The owner of the home was charged with night the Dachshunds arrived at the MSPCA-Angell to easily create their own web page with 35 counts of animal cruelty for failing to where they received medical care as well. photos and a message honoring a loved one provide a sanitary environment for over or a personal cause. You can tell the story two dozen Dachshund dogs, two cats, two of a special person, animal or cause and ferrets and an iguana. provide your family and friends with the opportunity to make an online donation on The defendant pled guilty by plea bargain behalf of the honoree or cause. Create a on several counts against her; other counts web page in honor, memory or were continued or dismissed by the court.