DOCSLIB.ORG

Ufl/Coel-92/008 Historical Shoreline Response To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ufl/Coel-92/008 Historical Shoreline Response To Historical shoreline response to inlet modifications and sea level rise (M.S. Engineering Thesis) Item Type monograph Authors Grant, Jonathan R. H. Publisher University of Florida, Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering Department Download date 05/10/2021 11:16:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/18449 UFL/COEL-92/008 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE TO INLET MODIFICATIONS AND SEA LEVEL RISE by Jonathan R. H. Grant Thesis May 1992 HISTORICAL SHORELINE RESPONSE TO INLET MODIFICATIONS AND SEA LEVEL RISE By JONATHAN R. H. GRANT A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Robert Dean, for all of his assistance and utmost patience in helping me complete this thesis. The assistance of my other committee members, Dr. Ashish Mehta and Dr. Daniel Hanes, is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank Cynthia Vey, Sandra Bivins, Becky Hudson, Helen Twedell and Sabarna Malakar for their patience, humor and help in transforming my research into a thesis. I would also like to thank all of the professors who have taught me so much outside of my research work. This work was sponsored by Florida Sea Grant, whose continued support of coastal re- search is appreciated. The data used in this study were supplied by the Florida Department of Natural Resources. Special thanks goes to Emmett Foster (of FDNR) for taking the time to help furnish the most up to date shoreline data. The salvation of my sanity is the result of all my friends in Gainesville, to whom I am indebted. Thanks to all my fellow Coastals: Steve, Sam (my initial tutor to graduate school), Paul, Phil D., Jei and Mike and especially Mark and Phil H. (of G. H. and Assoc.). Katia, Pete, Pete, Shannon and Annie are responsible for all my nonengineering, activities and their friendship and help in creating the Florida Four will never be forgotten. Finally, I would like to thank my brother, Dr. William "Boo" Grant for showing me that the ocean could be more than just a playground. I wish he could be here to see me accomplish that. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................ ii LIST OF FIGURES .................................... v LIST OF TABLES ...... ................................. xi ABSTRACT .................... ..................... xii CHAPTERS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................... ............ 1 1.1 Purpose of this Study ...... ............ ........... 1 1.2 Scope. ...................................... 2 2 APPROACH .................................... 7 2.1 Review of Available Data ........................... 7 2.2 Erosion at Inlets ................... ............. 9 2.2.1 Erosion at Modified Inlets .................... 10 2.2.2 The Updrift and Downdrift Extent of the Influence of Inlets . 14 2.3 Sea Level Rise ..... ... .......... ... .... 19 3 METHODOLOGY ................... ............... 23 3.1 Introduction .................... .............. 23 3.2 Shoreline Change Rates ............................ 23 3.2.1 Inlet Influenced Shoreline Segments . .... 24 3.2.2 The Coast of Florida ......................... 24 3.3 Sea Level Changes ............................. 25 4 RESULTS ...................................... 28 4.1 Introduction .................................... 28 4.2 East Coast Inlets ............................... 28 4.2.1 St. Augustine Inlet ................... ....... 28 4.2.2 Matanzas Inlet .................... ........... 32 4.2.3 Ponce de Leon Inlet ................... ....... 32 iii 4.2.4 Port Canaveral Entrance ....................... 36 4.2.5 Sebastian Inlet ............................ 40 4.2.6 Ft. Pierce Inlet ............................ 43 4.2.7 St. Lucie Inlet ... ... ... ..... ... ....... 47 4.2.8 Jupiter Inlet ....... ........ ... ... ..... .. 51 4.2.9 Lake Worth Inlet ................... ........ 54 4.2.10 South Lake Worth Inlet ....................... 57 4.2.11 Boca Raton Inlet .......................... 60 4.2.12 Hillsboro Inlet ................. ... ........ 63 4.2.13 Port Everglades Entrance . .. ... 67 4.2.14 Bakers Haulover Inlet ......................... 70 4.3 West Coast Inlets ............................... 73 4.3.1 Pensacola Pass ............................ 73 4.3.2 East Pass (Destin Harbor) ...................... 75 4.3.3 St. Andrews Bay Entrance Channel (Panama City) . ... 79 4.3.4 Mexico Beach Inlet ................... ....... 83 4.3.5 Venice Inlet ................... .......... 83 4.4 Counties .................... .............. 88 4.4.1 East Coast ................... ... ......... 88 4.4.2 W est Coast .............................. 90 4.5 Florida's Coastline .............................. 90 4.6 Effects of Inlets ................... .............. 92 4.7 Sea Level Rise ................... ..... .......... 97 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ....................... 104 REFERENCES .................... ................ 107 APPENDIX ...................................... .. 110 A.1 Introduction ...................... ....... ......... 110 A.2 East Coast Counties ................... .......... 112 A.3 West Coast Counties ................... .......... 126 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................... ........... 140 iv LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 Location of inlets along the coast of Florida covered in this thesis in- cluding the location of tide gauges from which the sea level data were obtained. ... ........... ......... .. ... ..... 4 1.2 Location of counties examined in this thesis for shoreline change. 5 1.3 Approximate longshore sediment transport along the coast of Florida. 6 2.1 DNR monuments located in St. Johns County. 8 2.2 Longshore migration of a natural inlet. ... 11 2.3 Basic transfer process of sand at a natural inlet. ... 11 2.4 Shoreline changes due to placement of a shore normal littoral barrier. 13 2.5 Shoreline changes as a result of placing jetties at an inlet ........ 16 2.6 Definitions of the variables Ob, B, h. and . ... 20 3.1 Monthly mean sea level variations and long-term sea level data at the three locations on the east coast of Florida used in this study. Based on tide gauge data (from Hicks et al., 1983). .... 27 4.1 Historical shorelines for St. Augustine Inlet (from Marino, 1986). 30 4.2 Shoreline change rates before (1858-1937) and after (1943-1986) training St. Augustine Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ... 31 4.3 Shoreline change rates before (1858-1924) and after (1937-1986) con- struction of the Rt. A1A bridge over Matanzas Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ... ........ .... 33 4.4 Shoreline change rates before (1873-1967) and after (1972-1989) training Ponce de Leon Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. .... 35 4.5 Ponce de Leon Inlet: South jetty alignment. Adapted from Jones and M ehta, 1978. .................. .............. 36 v 4.6 Shoreline change rates before (1874-1948) and after (1964-1986) training Port Canaveral. Change rates in feet per year. ... 38 4.7 Shoreline change rates for pre- (1964-1974) and post-nourishment (1976- 1986) of the south beach of Port Canaveral. The shoreline change rates for after training (see previous figure) are included for reference. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 39 4.8 Historical shorelines for Sebastian Inlet. ... 41 4.9 Shoreline change rates after training (1948-1986) Sebastian Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 42 4.10 Historical shorelines for Ft. Pierce Inlet. ..... 44 4.11 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1987) Ft. Pierce Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 45 4.12 Shoreline change rates for pre- (1928-1970) and post-nourishment (1972- 1987) of Ft. Pierce Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ... 46 4.13 Historical shorelines for St. Lucie Inlet (from Marino, 1986). 49 4.14 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1984) St. Lucie Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ................... ......... 50 4.15 Historical shorelines for Jupiter Inlet. ... 52 4.16 Shoreline change rates after training (1927-1980) Jupiter Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. .... .......................... 53 4.17 Historical shorelines for Lake Worth Inlet. ... 55 4.18 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1980) Lake Worth Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. Note that indicated downdrift accretion is due to recovery following south jetty construction. .... 56 4.19 South Lake Worth Inlet in 1969 ...................... 58 4.20 Shoreline change rates after training (1928-1980) South Lake Worth In- let. Change rates in feet per year. ..... 59 4.21 Historical shorelines for Boca Raton Inlet (from Marino, 1986) ... 61 4.22 Shoreline change rates after training (1942-1980) Boca Raton Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. ........... ...... .... ... 62 4.23 Hillsboro Inlet in 1967. ............................ 64 4.24 Shoreline change rates before (1883-1962) and after (1970-1985) jetty construction at Hillsboro Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. 65 vi 4.25 Shoreline change rates after construction (1935-1985) of initial training device (north rock groin) at Hillsboro Inlet. Change rates in feet per year. 66 4.26 Historical shorelines for Port Everglades Entrance. ... 68 4.27 Shoreline change rates after training (1935-1985) of Port Everglades En- trance. Change rates in feet per year. .... 69 4.28 Historical shorelines for Bakers Haulover Inlet. ... 71 4.29 Shoreline change rates after training (1927-1986) of Bakers Haulover Inlet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shoreline Response to Future Sea Level Rise James Houston Director Emeritus Engineer Research and Development Center Shoreline Response to Future Sea Level Rise
    Shoreline Response to Future Sea Level Rise James Houston Director Emeritus Engineer Research and Development Center Shoreline Response to Future Sea Level Rise Florida Florida Sandy Shorelines 1300 km Sandy Shorelines West East Southwest 0 200 kilometers Tourism is Its Leading Industry • Beaches its leading tourist Ft Myers Beach destination • Consequently, Florida beaches studied extensively Miami Beach Destin Beach St Petersburg Beach Shoreline Change • Shoreline position measurements from 1867- 2015 300 m Measurement • Shoreline change Locations East + 50 ± 5 m Southwest + 35 ± 15 m West - 25 ± 10 m • 1867 to before beach nourishment (1970, 1985) East + 25 ± 5 m Southwest + 5 ± 10 m West - 30 ± 10 m Accretion/Erosion Accretion Accretion • Netherland’s central coast has accreted since at least 1900 Onshore transport • Similar onshore transport on Excess Florida’s east/southwest coasts shoreface sand (Houston & Dean, 2014; Houston, 2015) • In contrast, the Florida west coast has eroded like many world coasts Florida West Coast West Coast West Counties (Political subdivisions) Understand the Past to Project the Future • Past (1867 - 2015) - Determine shoreline change using measured data - Quantify processes causing this change • Future (50 year and to 2100) - Project shoreline change with increased sea level rise - Analyze whether beach 2065 2016 nourishment can counter this increased rise Past Shoreline Change, 1867 - 2015 W ΔV ΔV LΔT dQ LΔTϕ LΔX = − LΔS ∗ − sink + source − + h + B h + B h + B dy h + B ∗ ∗ h∗ + B ∗ ∗ Measured Sea Level
    [Show full text]
  • The Modified Bruun Rule Extended for Landward Transport
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Army Research U.S. Department of Defense 2013 The modified Bruun Rule extended for landward transport J.D. Rosati U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, [email protected] R.G. Dean University of Florida T.L. Walton Coastal Tech Corp Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyresearch Rosati, J.D.; Dean, R.G.; and Walton, T.L., "The modified Bruun Rule extended for landward transport" (2013). US Army Research. 219. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyresearch/219 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Army Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Marine Geology 340 (2013) 71–81 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margeo The modified Bruun Rule extended for landward transport J.D. Rosati a,⁎, R.G. Dean b, T.L. Walton c a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314, United States b University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32605, United States c Coastal Tech Corp., Tallahassee, FL, United States article info abstract Article history: The Bruun Rule (Bruun, 1954, 1962) provides a relationship between sea level rise and shoreline retreat, and Received 3 January 2013 has been widely applied by the engineering and scientific communities to interpret shoreline changes and to Received in revised form 24 April 2013 plan for possible future increases in sea level rise rates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bruun Rule: Its Validity and Its Limitation
    The Bruun Rule: its validity and its limitation As you have already learned, sea level rise is one of the main problems affecting coastal zones on a global scale. It is not as simple as that the coast will just drown as if the coast is in a bath tub with increasing water level, since the coast will respond in a dynamic sense. Actually, a natural coast will adapt to sea level rise, the coast will want to keep pace with sea level rise, raising its profile relative to the sea level. A perfect response to rising sea levels! In order to do this a sediment budget deficit is created however. How does this actually work? Bruun (a Danish born coastal engineer that spent most of his career as a University Professor in Gainesville, FL, USA) was the first to describe this effect in 1962. The main idea behind the Bruun- Rule (c.f. Bosboom and Stive, 2010) is the assumption that the upper shore face (the morphologically active -on a time scale of years- part of the continental shelf, vertically extending from the first dune or berm ridge to a depth of 5 m to 20 m depending on the strength of the stormy waves) has a profile that is in equilibrium with the hydrodynamic forcing (i.e. wave driven processes mainly, but also density driven currents near river or estuarine entrances) and that for any perturbation in the forcing, the response of the profile will be relatively fast (see the video The origin and evolution of beaches, with the sand castle being absorbed in the coastal profile within a few wave motions).
    [Show full text]
  • Likely and High-End Impacts of Regional Sea-Level Rise on the Shoreline Change of European Sandy Coasts Under a High Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scenario
    water Article Likely and High-End Impacts of Regional Sea-Level Rise on the Shoreline Change of European Sandy Coasts Under a High Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scenario Rémi Thiéblemont 1,*, Gonéri Le Cozannet 1 , Alexandra Toimil 2 , Benoit Meyssignac 3 and Iñigo J. Losada 2 1 Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières “BRGM”, French Geological Survey, 3 Avenue, Claude Guillemin, CEDEX, 45060 Orléans, France; [email protected] 2 Environmental Hydraulics Institute “IHCantabria”, Universidad de Cantabria, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Cantabria, Calle Isabel Torres 15, 39011 Santander, Cantabria, Spain; [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (I.J.L.) 3 Laboratoire d’Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales “LEGOS“, Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, UPS, IRD, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 September 2019; Accepted: 5 December 2019; Published: 10 December 2019 Abstract: Sea-level rise (SLR) is a major concern for coastal hazards such as flooding and erosion in the decades to come. Lately, the value of high-end sea-level scenarios (HESs) to inform stakeholders with low-uncertainty tolerance has been increasingly recognized. Here, we provide high-end projections of SLR-induced sandy shoreline retreats for Europe by the end of the 21st century based on the conservative Bruun rule. Our HESs rely on the upper bound of the RCP8.5 scenario “likely-range” and on high-end estimates of the different components of sea-level projections provided in recent literature. For both HESs, SLR is projected to be higher than 1 m by 2100 for most European coasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Equilibrium Erosion of Soft Rock Shores with a Shallow Or Absent Beach Under Increased Sea Level Rise
    Walkden, M., and Dickson, M (2008) Equilibrium erosion of soft rock shores with a shallow or absent beach under increased sea level rise. Marine Geology, Vol 251/1-2 pp 75-84 DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2008.02.003 Equilibrium erosion of soft rock shores with a shallow or absent beach under increased sea level rise Dr. Mike Walkden a and Dr. Mark Dickson b aTyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Cassie Building, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU. UK. Email: [email protected] bSchool of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, The University of Auckland Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: [email protected] Corresponding Author: Dr. Mike Walkden, Tel: +44(0)191 222 6259, Fax: +44(0)191 222 6502. Abstract A process-based numerical model was used to explore the response of soft rock shores with low volume beaches to variable rates of sea level rise. Equilibrium recession rates were simulated for ranges of wave height and period, tidal amplitude, rock strength, beach volume and rate of sea level rise. Equilibrium shore profiles were found to be steeper with higher rates of sea level rise. Beaches were represented as protective surfaces yet were found to cause no significant reduction in equilibrium recession rate when their volumes were below a critical threshold. Reduced equilibrium recession rates were found with beaches that extended sufficiently far below low tide level. The model results imply that, given several constraints, a very simple relationship exists between increased rates of sea level rise and the response of eroding composite soft rock/ low volume beach shores.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea-Level Rise and Shoreline Retreat: Time to Abandon the Bruun Rule
    Global and Planetary Change 43 (2004) 157–171 www.elsevier.com/locate/gloplacha Sea-level rise and shoreline retreat: time to abandon the Bruun Rule J. Andrew G. Coopera,*, Orrin H. Pilkeyb aSchool of Environmental Studies, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK bNicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA Received 9 February 2004; accepted 22 July 2004 Abstract In the face of a global rise in sea level, understanding the response of the shoreline to changes in sea level is a critical scientific goal to inform policy makers and managers. A body of scientific information exists that illustrates both the complexity of the linkages between sea-level rise and shoreline response, and the comparative lack of understanding of these linkages. In spite of the lack of understanding, many appraisals have been undertaken that employ a concept known as the bBruun RuleQ. This is a simple two-dimensional model of shoreline response to rising sea level. The model has seen near global application since its original formulation in 1954. The concept provided an advance in understanding of the coastal system at the time of its first publication. It has, however, been superseded by numerous subsequent findings and is now invalid. Several assumptions behind the Bruun Rule are known to be false and nowhere has the Bruun Rule been adequately proven; on the contrary several studies disprove it in the field. No universally applicable model of shoreline retreat under sea-level rise has yet been developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ing Sea Level Is One of the Nlost Inlponsnt Applied Problems Facing
    AHS.~KA~-I:llsing tllc Sort11 C;trt~lic;t harrier isl;tntl sliorclinc :IS thc test :~tca.a \.aricty ol' si~i~l)lcgct~nictric rccr*.\ioti 1111d~lsII;I> hccn itpl~licrl prcilict slir~rr'linccrcbsion ratch filr various sea-level rise scrn;tril,\. All sea-lcvcl rise sccn;trir)s ;~s*unieno ;tccclcr;ttion in r;rw ell' risc. &)utl) t11' C;I~W Ltu~Lt)ut.the liruun Kulc. Gc~~craliic(IL.(J%rcttl~t KLI~ and t11c slt)p 01' thc migratiot~surlhcc all 1citd III \itliilitr r~..i.cssiol~pwdictions. Nonh III' Cap! !.th)kt)ul. tlic slolw crl' the ntigr;tlioll surt;lcc predicts ;I much grcatcr wccssit111lliit~t I#~uIIII-I~L~~;I~c~ nnhlcls. l'l~ihsuggests the possibility th;tt thc islands arc in a11 "out-01'-cquilihriu~ti~position" u.ith rerpcct lo prcsctil sc:~Ic\ocl. If this is llw caw. tllc ptnsibility~cxiststhiit ucr) rapid niipration 111' tlic nortl~crtii\lmds will sewn or-cur. Tl~c;tbsut~iptions usrd in tlic prchcnt n~;tthcn~aticalmodcls depicting shorc1il:c rctrcitt arc gcncrally weak. Bcttcr nitdcls arc ~~ccdctl. cspcchlry li>r slicbrclincs where rcccssion is pan of the harricr island migration process. The large number of types of island!, in a ividc \.;tricty t11' gcoltyic and c~c;tnt)gritphic scttiligs niakes ;I ~t~iiv~rsally;~l>pli~.abIc ~IOLIL'I difficult, if not impossible, 11) for11iul:ttc. risc; B = berm height; 0 = active profile slope; h = depth of active profile base; and L = width of active profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining Shoreline Response to Sea Level Rise
    Coastal Engineering 114 (2016) 1–8 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Coastal Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/coastaleng Determining shoreline response to sea level rise R.G. Dean a,1,J.R.Houstonb,⁎ a University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA b Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA article info abstract Article history: The Bruun rule is the most widely used method for determining shoreline response to sea level rise. It assumes Received 3 January 2016 that the active portion of an offshore profile rises with rising sea level, and the sand required to raise the profile Received in revised form 12 March 2016 is transported from the shoreline. It is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of the Bruun rule because sea level rise Accepted 20 March 2016 often has a lesser effect on shoreline change than that produced by sand sources, sinks, and longshore transport Available online xxxx gradients. In addition, some shorelines have advanced seaward with rising sea level. Dean (1987) showed that fi Keywords: equilibrium pro le theory predicts that rising sea levels produce landward sand movement forced by nonlinear Sea level rise waves. This paper presents an equation with terms representing all phenomena affecting shoreline change in- Shoreline response cluding Bruun-rule recession, onshore sand transport, sand sources and sinks, and longshore transport gradients. Beach nourishment As an example of its use, rates of onshore transport are determined along the 275-km Florida southwest coast, Onshore transport USA, and a 19-km portion of this coast using known values for sand sources, sinks, and longshore transport gra- Bruun rule dients.
    [Show full text]
  • The Equilibrium Concept, Or . . . (Mis)Concept in Beaches
    geosciences Review The Equilibrium Concept, or . (Mis)concept in Beaches Enzo Pranzini 1,* and Allan T. Williams 2 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy 2 Faculty of Architecture, Computing and Engineering, Trinity St. David, University of Wales, Swansea SA1 5HF, Wales, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: enzo.pranzini@unifi.it Abstract: Beaches, as deposits of unconsolidated material at the land/water interface, are open systems where input and output items constitute the sediment budget. Beach evolution depends on the difference between the input/output to the system; if positive the beach advances, if negative the beach retreats. Is it possible that this difference is zero and the beach is stable? The various processes responsible for sediment input and output in any beach system are here considered by taking examples from the literature. Results show that this can involve movement of a volume of sediments ranging from few, to over a million cubic meters per year, with figures continuously changing so that the statistical possibility for the budget being equal can be considered zero. This can be attributed to the fact that very few processes are feedback-regulated, which is the only possibility for a natural system to be in equilibrium. Usage of the term “beach equilibrium” must be reconsidered and used with great caution. Keywords: beach sediment budget; coastal dynamics; beach evolution; coastal morphology; feed- back processes Citation: Pranzini, E.; Williams, A.T The Equilibrium Concept, or . (Mis)concept in Beaches. Geosciences 1. Introduction 2021, 11, 59. https://doi.org/ Equilibrium is a term having many different meanings.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Erosion and Geomorphology
    MCCIP Annual Report Card 2007-2008 Scientific Review - Coastal Erosion and Coastal Geomorphology Topic Coastal erosion and coastal geomorphology Author(s) Gerhard Masselink1 and Paul Russell2 Organisation(s) represented 1School of Geography, Room 104, 12 Kirkby Place, Drake Circus, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA 2School of Earth, Ocean & Environmental Sciences, A528, Portland Square, Drake Circus, University of Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA Executive summary A large proportion of the UK coast is currently suffering from erosion (17% in the UK; 30% in England; 23% in Wales; 20% in Northern Ireland; 12% in Scotland). Almost two-thirds of the intertidal profiles in England and Wales have steepened over the past hundred years, a process which is particularly prevalent on coasts protected by hard engineering structures (this represents 46% of England’s coastline; 28% of Wales; 20% of Northern Ireland and 7% Scotland). Both coastal erosion and steepening of intertidal profiles effects are expected to increase in the future due to the effects of climate change, especially sea-level rise and changes to the wave conditions. The natural response of coastal systems to sea-level rise is to migrate landward according to the roll-over model, through erosion of the lower part of the nearshore profile and deposition on the upper part. This process is accompanied by the onshore transport of sediment. The roll-over model is applicable to estuaries, barriers and tidal flats, and the rate of coastal recession is likely to increase with the rate of sea-level rise. Rocky coasts (hard and soft) are erosional coasts and retreat even under stable sea-level conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level Rise Outpaced by Vertical Dune Toe Translation on Prograding Coasts Christa O
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Sea level rise outpaced by vertical dune toe translation on prograding coasts Christa O. van IJzendoorn1*, Sierd de Vries1, Caroline Hallin1,2 & Patrick A. Hesp3 Sea level is rising due to climate change and is expected to infuence the development and dynamics of coastal dunes. However, the anticipated changes to coastal dunes have not yet been demonstrated using feld data. Here, we provide evidence of dune translation that is characterized by a linear increase of the dune toe elevation on the order of 13–15 mm/year during recent decades along the Dutch coast. This rate of increase is a remarkable 7–8 times greater than the measured sea level rise. The observed vertical dune toe translation coincides with seaward movement of the dune toe (i.e., progradation), which shows similarities to prograding coasts in the Holocene both along the Dutch coast and elsewhere. Thus, we suspect that other locations besides the Dutch coast might also show such large ratios between sea level rise and dune toe elevation increase. This phenomenon might signifcantly infuence the expected impact of sea level rise and climate change adaptation measures. Coastal dunes are of vital importance for coastal protection and food safety, have high geomorphological, eco- logical and intrinsic values, and are an important recreational resource along large parts of the world’s coasts. Climate change, and its associated sea level rise (SLR), is an important driver for the development of coastal dunes. Numerous studies have investigated the coastline response to sea level rise 1–8, but it remains uncertain how SLR is impacting coastal dunes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Journal of Coast al Resear ch iii-v West Palm Beach , Florida Spring 2002 .lIltI/!II:. ~ - EDITORIAL How does a Barrier Shoreface Respond to a Sea-Level Rise? According to climatologists the Little Ice Age closed about shoreface profile at equilibrium in the face of a sea-level ris e 150-years ago, and since that tim e the average temperature an d with waves breaking closer to a fixed point on a main­ of the world's atmosphere ha s increased owing to natural land, BRUNN (1962) proposed that sediments must be eroded causes and to the anthropomorphic infusion of gree nhouse from a beach an d upper shoreface, transported, and deposited gases into the atmosphere. Many scientists believe that glob­ on a lower shoreface in order to aggrade the bottom in direct al warming will conti nue well into this century. Tidal records portion to a rise in sea level (Figure 1). Deposition on a lower collected from around the world and spanning th e past few shoreface extends to the limit ed water depth of sediment decade s show that shorelines in many parts of the world, in­ transport, which is about 16- 18 m for a hundred year time cluding the Atlantic an d Gulf coasts of the United States, frame (BRUUN, 1988). This theory does not incorporate over­ have been subjected to a relative sea-level rise . If global wash as a viable geomorphic process capable of enha ncing th e warming continues , it follows that sea level will conti nue to rate of beach erosion.
    [Show full text]