Memory & Renewal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Memory & Renewal MEMORY & RENEWAL By Robert Shaw Pfaffmann, AIA, AICP, Architect and Planner In October 2009, with the famed Stanley Cup shimmering dramatically at center ice of the Civic Arena (aka “the Igloo”), the Pittsburgh Penguins began their fi nal season under the historic pivoting stainless dome. The genesis of the Arena didn’t include hockey back in the late 1940s when local judge Abe Wolk and department store magnate Edgar Kaufmann envisioned a retractable fabric roof for the Civic Light Opera. Performances were often rained out at Pitt somewhat disturbing vision of a reconceived the Hill and make it a beacon of environmental Stadium so they dreamed of a new facility to and redeveloped Pittsburgh. The public got and social reform. Working with both public be located in Highland Park. Residents there to view it in the windows of Kaufmann’s and private funds ($1 million from Kaufmann opposed it, and meanwhile the original single- downtown store. Much to the chagrin of for an operable roof), ground was broken on purpose musical theater venue was growing into Wright, who had proposed a grand civic center Pittsburgh’s bicentennial in 1959. a multiple-use facility for sports and exhibitions at the Point, Kaufmann commissioned Mitchell with a stainless steel “hard top.” The roof, so & Ritchey to complete his vision of a moveable Urban Renewal & the 1960s important for keeping events dry, also became a roof civic auditorium. The unbridled optimism and embracing of new symbol of the city’s Renaissance; it would open The final location of “The Pittsburgh technologies in the 1950s was tempered with to clear skies, showing off the environmental Auditorium,” at a central point in the lower the fear of atomic war and the social upheavals transformation that had begun a decade earlier. Hill, took advantage of federally funded housing resulting from the civil rights movement. After all, it hadn’t been too long since a number and slum clearance programs in the early 1950s. Challenges included Jim Crow racism, housing of corporations had seriously planned to do A master plan developed by Mitchell & Ritchey for the poor and returning GI’s, and aging what Frank Lloyd Wright had once suggested envisioned a cultural acropolis modeled on infrastructure of 19th century cities. The general about Pittsburgh: “Abandon it!” New York’s Lincoln Center and included a half- public heard from the media and dedicated When young architects James Mitchell and dozen residential towers around it. (Only one preservationists like Jamie Van Trump that Dahlen Ritchey came back from World War II, was built: Washington Plaza.) the “sordid,” decayed Lower Hill was ready for they worked at Kaufmann’s department store, Kaufmann and an all-star cast of renewal by mass demolition. As Root Shock1 where they befriended Edgar Kaufmann. He Pittsburgh civic leaders under the mantle of author Mindy Fullilove writes, it may have been asked them to develop Pittsburgh in Progress, the Allegheny Conference on Community easier to look skyward and leave our domestic a fascinating 1947 document that provides a Development believed that they could renew problems at home. And so Pittsburgh’s business WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | SPRING 2010 45 and civic leaders, while struggling with issues of demolitions across the city and further into truss can be thought of as half of a cantilevered race, class, and poverty, saw slum clearance as a the Hill caused neighborhood groups with arch bridge—and was, in fact, constructed by way to improve the basic living conditions of Hill little voice in city hall (or in the Allegheny the American Bridge Company very much like residents, and a futuristic replacement fi t perfectly. Conference) to rise up and oppose further a bridge. The structural engineer was the famed In this context, Pittsburgh decided to build demolition. Many, including most business bridge engineer Othmar Ammann of Ammann the Civic Arena as a centerpiece of urban design leaders of the Hill, had not foreseen that the & Whitney. and architecture. It was to contain not only cure was becoming worse than the disease. The concept of a moveable dome structure the Arena but a “cultural acropolis” of a new Urban renewal went from idealistic social required not only creative architectural planning symphony hall, opera house, and underground housing plans to “negro removal” in the view of but engineering innovation in the structure, parking topped by gardens. While the nation’s neighborhood leaders. systems, and cladding. The innovative stainless urban agenda was in fl ux, architects continued As was the case with Three Rivers Stadium, steel roof consists of eight, 300-ton radial leaves, to be inspired by new technologies in steel, a sea of parking lots became the sad legacy of two of which are fi xed below the cantilevered aluminum, and glass–—all these innovations this plan. support. The end of the truss contains a hinged coming from Pittsburgh. The city’s Civic Arena knuckle that allows each of the six moveable became a “Crucible of Modernism” with its The Arena’s Design sections to rotate. soaring visions of the future. On the south side While the complex and controversial urban The dome’s leaves can be rotated into of a widened Centre Avenue, a half-dozen new renewal processes failed, the technical different confi gurations depending on events state-of-the-art residential towers in park-like innovations and the design of the Arena forged and weather conditions. The roof leaves roll settings (by architect IM Pei) were planned with ahead. On September 17, 1961, the newly along rails mounted on a canted support ring views overlooking the newly clean air (by 1950s christened Civic Arena became the longest-span that resolves the thrust of the dome into 48 standards anyway) above the Mon River. retractable roof dome in the world at 413 feet cast-concrete legs. The roof segments are After the Arena was built, federal subsidies in diameter and 150 feet high. A cantilevered transported by 30 electric rail-mounted motors and programs dried up and the ongoing central box beam supports the roof. This tapered on the ring, which measures a quarter of a mile in circumference. The dome can be opened in under three minutes. The building’s roof control systems were as innovative as the structure. The dynamic loads of a moving roof had to be controlled precisely and account for wind and gravity. For architects Construction and engineers today, this structure is all the of the dome. more amazing considering it was accomplished William V. Winans Jr. Collection, Box 1, Folder 24. without the aid of computer modeling. The Burden of Preserving the Recent Past Fifty years later, the Civic Arena is a recognized architectural and engineering landmark: it is has been designated eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. With its still- working retractable roof, it is a one-of-a- kind building in the world, and worthy of preservation and adaptive reuse. The Pittsburgh Sports & Exhibition Authority (SEA), which owns the Igloo, has begun reviewing its future as required under state and federal law. (By the way, the “Igloo” nickname would influence 46 WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | SPRING 2010 the naming of the Penguins years later, not the other way around.) The role of the Arena in the context of the urban and social history of the Hill and the city is a confl icted one and the question of demolition needs our full attention and should not be considered without careful understanding of the social, economic, and historic impacts. Pittsburgh has an opportunity to demonstrate that an innovative, unique structure can have new life as a sustainable civic space and anchor for new development of the Lower Hill. We must ask ourselves, is history and the community served by demolition and erasure of our collective memory? Fifty years ago we could not have imagined that we would put museums and residences in old warehouses. The arena is the 20th century version of our old train stations and warehouses that were also considered by many as obsolete just 50 years ago. The words of perhaps the Hill’s best- known resident, playwright August Wilson, may point the way: “My plays insist that we should not forget or toss away our history.” While he was referring to his roots in the community and the culture he knew, his words challenge us to ask questions about the many histories and memories that exist—some good, some bad. The question for buildings Its resemblance to a spaceship like the Civic Arena is, do we delete it from our was no coincidence for the Arena, memories, or transform it and make it a vital having been built in a time of anchor for the rebirth of the Hill? optimism for space travel. Photo by Robert Shaw Pfaffmann Rob Pfaffmann, AIA, AICP is a registered architect and certifi ed urban planner with over 30 years of diverse experience leading the design of key An approximation of where the architecture, preservation and planning projects Arena sits in relation to the old Hill District neighborhood. in the Pittsburgh region. His Pfaffmann + Robert Shaw Pfaffmann collection. Associates fi rm designed the award-winning enclosure at the National Historic Landmark Meadowcroft Rockshelter. 1 Mindy Fullilove, Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do About It (New York: One World/Ballantine, 2004). WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | SPRING 2010 47 The Civic Arena boasted a revolutionary design, but heavy with steel; the retractable roof alone used 2,950 tons of beams and girders straight from Pittsburgh mills. Carnegie Mellon University Architecture Archives The Consol Energy Center is set to open in the Fall 2010 and will function as an event center for NHL hockey, basketball, family shows, skating shows, concerts, stage shows, exhibitions and other events.
Recommended publications
  • Safeco Field Seattle, Washington
    Safeco Field Seattle, Washington n 1995, Seattle’s profes- sionalI baseball team, the Mariners, decided they wanted a new stadium. Across the country, great baseball venues were being created, echoing the early days of old-style stadiums, fresh grass fields, and the great outdoors. After 21 years of playing in the fully enclosed Kingdome, the Mariners, too, wanted out in the sun, both for the joy of playing outside and the financial boost it would bring the team. But Seattle’s rainy climate dic- tated that the stadium be equipped with an “umbrella” to shield fans on days of inclement weather. And, thus, the demand was made: Build us a new stadi- um, open to the sky, with real grass, but make sure we can cover the field and the fans when it rains. Plus, do it by opening day 1999. With those ground rules, the design team set to work. The result is Safeco Field, a 47,000 seat, state-of-the-art, retractable roof ballpark. This one-of-a-kind project offers a landmark public amenity that will keep major league baseball in the region for years to come. It pro- vides good family entertainment, while stimulating economic growth and redevelopment in the area. Proactive management and innovative design solutions were required to meet the aggressive Modern Steel Construction / March 2000 project schedule and design chal- lenges. The retractable roof was designed for speedy erection and to minimize the impact on the construction of the seating bowl. The close proximity to the Seattle Fault required special seismic considerations, such as the use of an innovative viscous damping system in the roof that reduces the seismic forces by 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Considerations for Retractable-Roof Stadia
    Design Considerations for Retractable-roof Stadia by Andrew H. Frazer S.B. Civil Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of AASSACHUSETTS INSTiTUTE MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING MAY 3 12005 AT THE LIBRARIES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2005 © 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author:.................. ............... .......... Department of Civil Environmental Engineering May 20, 2005 C ertified by:................... ................................................ Jerome J. Connor Professor, Dep tnt of CZvil and Environment Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by:................................................... Andrew J. Whittle Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies BARKER Design Considerations for Retractable-roof Stadia by Andrew H. Frazer Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 20, 2005 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering ABSTRACT As existing open-air or fully enclosed stadia are reaching their life expectancies, cities are choosing to replace them with structures with moving roofs. This kind of facility provides protection from weather for spectators, a natural grass playing surface for players, and new sources of revenue for owners. The first retractable-roof stadium in North America, the Rogers Centre, has hosted numerous successful events but cost the city of Toronto over CA$500 million. Today, there are five retractable-roof stadia in use in America. Each has very different structural features designed to accommodate the conditions under which they are placed, and their individual costs reflect the sophistication of these features.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Basketball
    WOMEN’S BASKETBALL 2016 ATLANTIC 10 CHAMPIONS • NINE STRAIGHT POSTSEASON APPEARANCES •REPRESENTING SEVEN COUNTRIES DUQUESNE (1-1) AT PITTSBURGH (2-0) 2017-18 SCHEDULE Nov. 16 • 7:00 PM • Pittsburgh, Pa.•Petersen Events Center (12, 508) 1-1, 0-0 ATLANTIC 10 DUQUESNE Dukes Pittsburgh Panthers Head Coach: Dan Burt Head Coach: Suzie McConnell-Serio DATE OPPONENT TIME/RESULT Record at DUQ: 89-47 (5th) Record at PITT: 59-67 (5th) GAME 3 11.10 at Charlotte L, 72-75 Overall: Same Overall: 182-135 (11th) 11.12 at Winthrop W, 81-54 11.16 at Pittsburgh 7:00 PROJECTED STARTERS 11.19 at ETSU 1:00 11.21 Iona 6:00 11.25 vs. NC A&T - 1 4:30 11.26 at Virginia - 1 3:30 Julijana Vojinovic 11.30 Saint Francis U 7:00 5-10 // JR // G 12.2 Central Connecticut 2:00 12.6 Toledo 5:30 Čačak, Serbia 12.9 Akron 3:00 14.0 ppg // 6.0 rpg 12.17 Central Michigan 2:30 12.22 vs. UConn - 2 7:00 13 12.31 Massachusetts* 1:00 1.4 at Davidson* 7:00 Chassidy Omogrosso 1.7 at VCU* 1:00 5-4 // JR // G 1.13 at George Washington* 12:00 Beaver Falls, Pa. 1.17 La Salle* 7:00 1.21 George Mason* 2:00 14.0 ppg // 1.5 rpg 1.24 at Saint Joseph’s* 7:00 2 1.28 St. Bonaventure* 4:00 1.31 at Dayton* 7:00 Conor Richardson 2.4 at Richmond* 12:00 2.7 VCU* 7:00 5-10 // JR // G 2.10 Saint Joseph’s* 2:30 Pittsburgh, Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • Whether You're a Hockey Fan Or Not, If You Grew up in Pittsburgh, The
    page 1 of 3 (Editorial Note: This was originally posted on ThePensandthepen.com. Whether you’re a hockey fan or not, if you grew up in Pittsburgh, the Civic Arena almost certainly resides in a special place within your memory. The shiny, stainless steel dome peeking out as you round the ramp to Center Ave., the aroma of popcorn that would hit you just as you crossed the threshold, and all of the historic events that took place within; there was always an electricity about it, no matter what the event was. It’s an iconic place that symbolizes Pittsburgh. It’s not flashy or Time’s Up. The Last Regular Season Game at Mellon Arena high-end. It is what it is; it’s utilitarian. It has done its job for 50 years, and it’s still cool in its own way. Now, after all of the history, after all of the memories, after all of the excitement and emotion that the concerts and hockey games, circuses and political events engendered beneath its dome, its fate is unknown. It sits there, fenced off, dark and silently looking towards its replacement: the bright, spacious, state-of-the-art Consol Energy Center (CEC). The two buildings couldn’t be any more different. But then again, they couldn’t be more A Postgame Goodbye to my Second Home: E17 Row C Seats 5&6 similar. They are both loved and hated. The Civic Arena was cramped, dingy and sorely outdated. But, it had character - a personality all its own - and a soul that all of the old hockey barns, like Boston Garden and the Montreal Forum had.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: 1976 Clown College and 1977 Blue Unit Route
    A p p e n d i x A : 1 9 7 6 C l o w n College and 1977 Blue Unit Route There’s nothing so dangerous as sitting still. You’ve only got one life, one youth, and you can let it slip through your fingers; nothing easier. Willa Cather, The Bohemian Girl CHAPTER 1 • ROMANCE OF THE RED NOSE Clown College, Ringling Arena, Venice, Sep.–Nov. 1976 CHAPTER 2 • BOWL OF CHERRIES Rehearsals and first performances, Ringling Arena, Venice, Jan. 10–Feb. 2 CHAPTER 3 • RUBBER NOSE MEETS THE ROAD Lakeland Civic Center, Feb. 4–6 Atlanta Omni, Feb. 9–20 Savannah Civic Center, Feb. 22–23 Asheville Civic Center, Feb. 25–27 Raleigh, Dorton Arena, Mar. 1–6 Fayetteville, Cumberland County Memorial Arena, Mar. 8–9 Columbia, Carolina Coliseum, Mar. 11–13 Charlotte Coliseum, Mar. 15–20 CHAPTER 4 • THE SHOW BUSINESS Knoxville, Civic Coliseum, Mar. 22–27 Cincinnati, Riverfront Coliseum, Mar. 30–Apr. 3 168 Appendix A Washington, DC, Armory, Apr. 6–17 Largo, Capital Centre, Apr. 20-May 1 CHAPTER 5 • LOVE ‘EM & LEAVE ‘EM Binghamton, Broome County Veterans Memorial Arena, May 4–8 Hartford, Civic Center, May 10–15 Portland, Cumberland County Civic Center, May 17–22 CHAPTER 6 • GOOD OL’ DAYS? Troy, RPI Field House, May 25–30 Providence Civic Center, June 1–5 Niagara Falls, International Convention Center, June 8–12 Wheeling Civic Center, June 15–19 Charleston Civic Center, June 21–22 Memphis, Mid-South Coliseum, June 24–26 CHAPTER 7 • RODEO ROUTE Little Rock, T.H. Barton Coliseum, June 28–29 Huntsville, von Braun Civic Center, July 1–4 Dallas, Convention Center, July 6–11 New Orleans, Superdome, July 14–17 Houston, Summit, July 20–31 Abilene, Taylor County Expo Center, August 2–3 Lubbock, Civic Center, August 5–7 CHAPTER 8 • SPIRIT OF ST.
    [Show full text]
  • North Shore Development Phase III North Shore Drive, Pittsburgh NORTH SHORE PHASE III
    North Shore Development Phase III North Shore Drive, Pittsburgh NORTH SHORE PHASE III About the North Shore Since its time as home to Three Rivers Stadium, the North Shore has become one of Pittsburgh’s most popular entertainment and retail destinations. Now home to PNC Park (Pittsburgh Pirates) and Heinz Field (Pittsburgh Steelers and Pitt Panthers), the North Shore is so much more than just game days. Local attractions include Stage AE, Rivers Casino, Bettis 36 Grille, Burgato- ry, Hyde Park Prime Steak House, Bar Louie, Southern Tier, Tequila Cowboy, McFadden’s and many other with more restaurants and retail being added at all times. Join King Street Grill! With over 14,000 square feet available, Phase III of the North Shore Development is the chance to give your restaurant or retail business the big splash it needs to become the next hot spot. Aerial View Site Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 198'-3 1/2" OVERALL 22'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 22'-0" 4'-2" 8" 16'-8" 8" 4'-0" 1'-4" 23'-4" 1'-4" 4'-11 3/8" 24'-9 7/8" 4'-2 1/8" 1'-4" 23'-4" 1'-4" 4'-0" 1'-4" 23'-4" 1'-4" 4'-0" 1'-4" 23'-4" 1'-4" 4'-0" 8" 16'-8" 8" 4'-2" 4'-1 1/2" A 4'-2" 5'-5 7/8" 5'-5 7/8" 8" 8" 2 1 2 1 2 1 54'-7 3/8" 3'-5/8" 19'-11 1/4" 2'-11" 60'-1" 54'-5 3/4" 14'-8" 14'-8" 1 8" 8" 38'-4" 37'-7 1/2" 4'-0" 4'-0" 42'-0" 8" 8" AVAILABLE Retail Tenant 1 AVAILABLE 37'-7 3/4" Retail Tenant 2 Retail Tenant 3 Office Shell 39'-2 3/4" 6,6756,675 SQ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stadium Game Pittsburgh Style
    Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 10 Article 8 Issue 2 Spring The tS adium Game Pittsburgh Style: Observations on the Latest Round of Publicly Financed Sports Stadia in Steel Town, U.S.A.; and Comparisons with 28 Other Major League Teams Kevin Clark Forsythe Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Kevin Clark Forsythe, The Stadium Game Pittsburgh Style: Observations on the Latest Round of Publicly Financed Sports Stadia in Steel Town, U.S.A.; and Comparisons with 28 Other Major League Teams, 10 Marq. Sports L. J. 237 (2000) Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol10/iss2/8 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STADIUM GAME PITTSBURGH STYLE: OBSERVATIONS ON THE LATEST ROUND OF PUBLICLY FINANCED SPORTS STADIA IN STEEL TOWN, U.S.A.; AND COMPARISONS WITH 28 OTHER MAJOR LEAGUE TEAMS KEvIN CLARK FORSYTHE* I. INTRODUCTION Few domestic policy issues generated more debate in the closing dec- ade of the twentieth-century than the propriety, nature, and extent of public subsidies for major league sports franchises. My city, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: "Steel Town, U.S.A." was no exception. Ages ago, in November of 1997, to be exact, the General Assembly of the Keystone State graciously granted the voters in ten southwestern Pennsylvania counties the opportunity to impose an additional 0.5% sales tax upon themselves, their fortunes, and their sacred honors; the proceeds to be used in part to fund the construction of two new stadiums for the Pittsburgh Pirates and Steelers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Astrodome Contained Multitudes
    1 FALL2008.cite 8 T h e A s t r o Revival tent, rodeo, baseball and football arena, bullfight- ing ring, monster truck pit—the Astrodome contained multitudes. Over the years architects have been imagining possibilities for its next incarnation. Conceived of by David Bucek, this 1990 illustration depicts a sanctuary for survivors of a worldwide ecological disaster. The glory days, 19 e t the decline, i c . 8 the future 0 0 2 L L A odome By Madeleine McDermott Hamm F n 1999, as the Houston Astros were packing up their gear and preparing Ito exit the Astrodome for the new downtown baseball-only ballpark, team owner Drayton McLane received a prophetic phone call from an architect in Rome. “He wanted to bring a production crew to Emmett insists, “No one at the county level wants to Judge Emmett says the county spends about $3 Houston to film the Astrodome,” McLane recalls. tear down the Astrodome.” million a year on minimum maintenance of the “And he said, ‘Don’t let them tear down the After the Astros moved downtown to Minute Astrodome (now officially called Reliant Astrodome Astrodome.’” Maid Park (originally Enron Field), Reliant Stadium as part of the Reliant Park complex). Some estimate Now, nine years later, preservationists and was erected next door to the Dome, opening in 2002 the figure closer to $5 million. Whatever the bottom Houstonians with memories of the Astrodome’s for the Texans’ football games. Today the line, the results equal neglect. glory years fear that the mostly abandoned, mini- Astrodome stands silent and dark.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Stadium Design
    Evolution of Stadium Design by Erika Yaroni Bachelor of Engineering Stevens Institute of Technology, 2011 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ENGINEERING in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY !d A JUNE 2012 ARCHIVES © 2012 Erika Yaroni. All Rights Reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. / A Author: Department of Civil and Elironmental Engineering SMay 11, 2012 Certified by: Jerome J. Connor Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering )lesis Supervjsor Accepted by: 6'igM epf Chair, Departmental Committee for Graduate Stu nts Evolution of Stadium Design by Erika Yaroni Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 11, 2012 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering ABSTRACT Stadiums are more than just facilities for organized sport; they offer a gathering site for people with shared interest, provide economic benefits to the surrounding community, and most importantly represent the advancements in architecture and engineering. When stadiums were first developed, their main focus was to provide enclosure for athletes' play and little attention was given to spectators. Most Greek and Roman athletic facilities are guilty of this. While the general geometry of stadiums remains the same today, the structure itself has changed tremendously. As this thesis will point out, there is a multitude of structural systems that have been employed in the design of stadiums.
    [Show full text]
  • SF-Retractable Roofs the Past.Indd
    By Surinder Mann and Bryan Tokarczyk Safeco Field courtesy of NBBJ The idea of moving roofs on sports stadia has been around for thousands of years. In fact, the coliseum in Rome had a movable linen awning in ancient times. By nature of the venue supported, stadia roofs free-span incredible distances. Much of their function is to protect the players and spectators from the environment. However, many of the activities require natural turf, and therefore sunlight - hence the introduction of one solution, the retractable roof system. This article examines the structure and background of the retractable roofs that have been built in the US over the last decade or so, and attempts to envision the future for this unique form of building. Minute Maid Park courtesy of HOK S+V+E STRUCTURE magazine • November 2004 33 Miller Park courtesy of HKS Past Concept For over three decades, designers have Retractable roofs have improved the In the concept phase of such facilities, seriously considered the working attributes predictability of the game’s scheduling over constructing a team of key players is essential of stadia roofs that can open and close upon open venues, bringing more spectators to successfully working through the feasibility command. The nature of the large facilities, from farther away to view a game or event, of architectural, structural, and mechanization long spans, and impressive loading conditions which was much more likely to be held than ideas. Unique to the retractable roof is the encourages designers to exercise all in the past. Owners have embraced this introduction of a mechanization team who will their design expertise, as well as improvement in game predictability, as well as have the perspective of the roof’s operability seek out new skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh Arena Real Estate Redevelopment LP (PAR) Request
    Pittsburgh Arena Real Estate Redevelopment LP (PAR) Request for Qualifications Pre-Development Opportunities For Contractors and Service Providers for the Lower Hill Redevelopment Site Issue Date: November 18, 2020 Qualifications Due Date: December 31, 2020 A. OBJECTIVE Pittsburgh Arena Real Estate Redevelopment LP (“PAR”) is pleased to present this Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”)to enhance the list of pre-qualified contractors, vendors, professional service providers, retail tenants, owners and co-developers to participate in the redevelopment of the 28- acre Lower Hill Redevelopment Site (the “Site”). PAR is working with public partners and private development teams from Intergen Real Estate Group, LLC (PAR’s housing development partner) and The Buccini / Pollin Group, Inc. (PAR’s commercial development partner) on redeveloping the Site into a successful, mixed-use project consistent with a recently-completed Master Plan from Gensler. Interested parties are invited to submit qualifications in response to this RFQ. PAR anticipates issuing this RFQ in phases and selecting individuals through the various phases of the development - pre-development , development, and post-development. The goal of this RFQ is to determine levels of private sector interest in this project by those who demonstrate appropriate qualifications to carry out the elements of the project. There is a focus on reviewing qualifications of minority and women business enterprises to participate in ownership, development, design, construction, operation, management and tenancy of the development as outlined in the Lower Hill Redevelopment Community Collaboration and Implementation Plan (the "CCIP”). (Please see the CCIP to review the Focus Areas outlined in the plan on page 5.) B.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Meeting of January 5, 2011 Beginning at 12:30 PM 200 Ross Street First Floor Hearing Room Pittsburgh, PA 15219 in Attendance
    Division of Development Administration and Review City of Pittsburgh, Department of City Planning 200 Ross Street, Third Floor Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Minutes of the Meeting of January 5, 2011 Beginning at 12:30 PM 200 Ross Street First Floor Hearing Room Pittsburgh, PA 15219 In Attendance: Members Staff Others Others (cont.) Noor Ismail Makenzie Diehl Keith Cochran John Menniti Ernie Hogan Ahmed Martin Anne Nelson Linda McClellan Eloise McDonald Travis Williams Arthur Sheffield Jeff Wilhelm Jeff Slack Joe Serrao Dusty Kirk Gary English John Jennings Matthew Galluto Lloyd Wright James Eash John Stephen Scott Leib Audrey Reihblum Scott Pollock Steve Swartz Pat Washington Sandy Brown New Business Approval of Minutes: In regards to the November 2010 minutes, Mr. Serrao moved to approve. Ms. Ismail seconded the motion, all members voted in favor. Certificates of Appropriateness: In regards to the November 2010 Certificates of Appropriateness, Mr. Serrao moved to approve, Ms. McClellan seconded, all members voted in favor. Other: Applications for Economic Hardship: None Upcoming Demolitions: None Adjourn: Mr. Serrao moved to adjourn, Ms. McClellan seconded the motion, all voted in favor. Discussion on hearing items follows on the attached pages. 1 Pittsburgh HRC Minutes – January 5, 2011 Iron City Brewery Individual Landmark OWNER: WARD: .......................................... 6th APPLICATION RECEIVED:12/15/2010 Iron City Brewery, LLC LOT & BLOCK: ................. 26-A-300 3340 Liberty Avenue SITE VISITS: Pittsburgh, PA 15201 INSPECTOR: ....................... JIM KING CERTIFICATES OF APP.:00-000 COUNCIL DISTRICT: ......................... APPLICANT: Iron City Brewery, LLC ZONING CLASSIFICATION: ............... 3340 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15201 ARCH. RATING:................................. NATIONAL REGISTER: LISTED ......................................... ELIGIBLE ...................................... Proposed Changes: Proposed demolition of “Pipe Shop” Building Discussion: 1.
    [Show full text]