DOCSLIB.ORG

Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us All V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A 20th-anniversary report Islamophobia Still a challenge for us all Edited by Farah Elahi and Omar Khan Runnymede: Intelligence 20th-anniversary report This report marks the 20th-year anniversary of Runnymede’s for a Multi-ethnic Britain 1997 report Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All. Part I represents Runnymede’s position, including 10 recommendations to address Islamophobia, Part II outlines Runnymede is the UK’s the evidence on Islamophobia in various social domains, and leading independent thinktank Part III includes differing perspectives on how to understand on race equality and race Islamophobia. The latter chapters present the views of the individual chapter authors and not necessarily those of the relations. Through high- Runnymede Trust. quality research and thought leadership, we: Acknowledgements This research was made possible with the generous assistance of the Aziz Foundation, Global Dialogue, Joseph • Identify barriers to race Rowntree Charitable Trust and Unbound Philanthropy, and equality and good race we would like to thank them again for their support. The relations; views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of these funders. • Provide evidence to support action for social We would like to extend our thanks to all our chapter authors change; and case study contributors, Luke Finley for his excellent work on copy-editing this report and Alison Shakspeare for • Influence policy at all her patience in typesetting it. We were also supported by The levels. Bridge Institute, in particular Louis Carserides, who provided a helpful sounding-board throughout the last year. ISBN: 978-1-909546-25-7 Published by Runnymede in November 2017, this document is copyright © Runnymede 2017. Some rights reserved. Open access. Some rights reserved. The Runnymede Trust wants to encourage the circulation of its work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. The trust has an open access policy which enables anyone to access its content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Licence Deed: Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales. Its main conditions are: • You are free to copy, distribute, display and perform the work; • You must give the original author credit; • You may not use this work for commercial purposes; • You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. You are welcome to ask Runnymede for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Runnymede is grateful to Creative Commons for its work and its approach to copyright. For more information please go to www.creativecommons.org Runnymede St Clement’s Building, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE T 020 7377 9222 E [email protected] www.runnymedetrust.org CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................................................................. v Baroness Sayeeda Warsi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................1 PART I: UNDERSTANDING 1 Introduction: What is Islamophobia? ............................................................................................5 Farah Elahi and Omar Khan 2 Raceing Islamophobia ..................................................................................................................13 Claire Alexander PART II: MAPPING 3 British Muslims: An overview .......................................................................................................17 Serena Hussain 4 Poverty and the labour market ....................................................................................................25 Anthony Heath and Asma Mustafa Case study 1: Khadija ........................................................................................................................30 5 Islamophobia, racism and health ................................................................................................31 James Nazroo and Laia Bécares Case study 2: Layla ............................................................................................................................36 6 Impacts of anti-Muslim hate crime .............................................................................................37 Imran Awan and Irene Zempi Case study 3: Sahar ...........................................................................................................................40 7 Prevent and the normalization of Islamophobia ........................................................................41 Barbara Cohen and Waqas Tufail 8 Framing Muslim integration .........................................................................................................46 Ajmal Hussain and Nasar Meer Case study 4: Adam ...........................................................................................................................50 9 The challenges facing Muslim communities and civic society ................................................51 Chris Allen Case study 5: Tariq .............................................................................................................................55 10 Islamophobia across borders ....................................................................................................56 Ed Pertwee Case Study 6: Jasvir...........................................................................................................................60 11 ‘Everyone is a feminist when it comes to Muslim women’: Gender and Islamophobia ......61 Naaz Rashid PART III: DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF ISLAMOPHOBIA 12 Islamophobia and the Muslim struggle for recognition ..........................................................66 Tariq Modood 13 What’s in a name? .......................................................................................................................69 Shenaz Bunglawala 14 Fear, indifference and engagement: Rethinking the challenge of anti-Muslim bigotry .......73 Kenan Malik 15 Islamophobia and antisemitism ................................................................................................78 David Feldman 16 The Runnymede Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia: A history ................82 Robin Richardson References ........................................................................................................................................85 Notes on contributors ......................................................................................................................97 Islamophobia: Still a challenge for us all v Foreword Baroness Sayeeda Warsi It has been 20 years since the publication of the Runnymede Trust’s report Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All and, as this report highlights, in the last two decades the phenomenon has become more complex and entrenched. In 2011, I said that Islamophobia had passed the dinner-table test. I was speaking about those who display their bigotry overtly, but also those who do so more subtly in the most respectable of settings – middle-class dinner tables. It is this more covert form of Islamophobia, couched in intellectual arguments and espoused by thinktanks, commentators and even politicians, that I have spent the last decade trying to reason with. The rationalizing of bigotry is not new. Discrimination has always been subject to ideological and intellectual justification. Whether this is directed against women, black people, Jewish people or LGBT communities, history shows that it’s always possible to rationalize racism and couch bigotry in ‘acceptable’ arguments; this form of hatred is the most dangerous. Muslims are the latest in a long line caught in the crossfire of these so-called rational arguments. Islamophobia is Britain’s latest bigotry blind spot. Sadly, six years on from my first keynote speech on Islamophobia, there has been little funding for work combating Islamophobia and little political will to tackle the issue. Indeed, decades on from Runnymede’s early attempts to define Islamophobia, the UK government still does not have an agreed, published definition. To challenge Islamophobia the starting point must surely be a definition, a mechanism that leads to accountability. The Runnymede Trust’s definition is a starting point for discussion. We also need to bring together a cross-section of community organizations and individuals, parliamentarians and government, to agree a definition. Hate crime figures for the last 12 months have been the highest since records began, and in one month alone anti-Muslim hate crime increased by 500%. The number of Islamophobic incidents recorded is at an all-time high, and all while it’s accepted that the problem is under-reported. The government’s latest Hate Crime Action Plan accepts that only 25% of actual hate crimes are reported to the police. The plan, published in 2015, made some 80 recommendations, of which many have been either not followed, such as the work with IPSO (the Independent Press Standards Organisation), or not fully implemented. We are simply skimming the surface of the problem. Some within British Muslim communities tasked with tackling this issue have also proved disappointing, seeming to spend more energy on in-fighting than fighting the challenge of Islamophobia. Of all the challenges
Recommended publications
  • Implementing the Racial Equality Strategy

    Implementing the Racial Equality Strategy

    Final October 2014 EQUALITY COMMISSION FOR NORTHERN IRELAND Response to the consultation by OFMDFM on ‘A Sense of Belonging- Delivering Social Change through a Racial Equality Strategy for Northern Ireland 2014-2024’ Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 2 A step in the right direction .................................................................................. 2 3 Key Concerns ...................................................................................................... 3 4 General Summary of the Commission’s Recommendations ................................ 6 5 Consultation questions ...................................................................................... 11 6 Chapter 1: Introduction and background ........................................................... 11 7 Chapter 2: Racism and racial Inequalities: the scale of the challenge………….13 8 Chapter 3: The purpose, vision and aims of this Strategy ................................. 18 9 Chapter 4: The relationship of the Strategy with Together Building a United Community (TBUC) and Delivering Social Change (DSC) ............................... 31 10 Chapter 6: The legislative framework ............................................................. 38 11 Chapter 7: Immigration ................................................................................... 44 12 Chapter 8: Making it happen: implementing the Racial Equality Strategy ...... 48 13 Chapter 9: Resourcing
  • Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich

    Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich

    Kantor Center Position Papers Editor: Mikael Shainkman January 2018 ANTISEMITISM IN THE RADICAL LEFT AND THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY Dave Rich* Executive Summary Antisemitism has become a national political issue and a headline story in Britain for the first time in decades because of ongoing problems in the Labour Party. Labour used to enjoy widespread Jewish support but increasing left wing hostility towards Israel and Zionism, and a failure to understand and properly oppose contemporary antisemitism, has placed increasing distance between the party and the UK Jewish community. This has emerged under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, a product of the radical 1960s New Left that sees Israel as an apartheid state created by colonialism, but it has been building on the fringes of the left for decades. Since Corbyn became party leader, numerous examples of antisemitic remarks made by Labour members, activists and elected officials have come to light. These remarks range from opposition to Israel’s existence or claims that Zionism collaborated with Nazism, to conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds or ISIS. The party has tried to tackle the problem of antisemitism through procedural means and generic declarations opposing antisemitism, but it appears incapable of addressing the political culture that produces this antisemitism: possibly because this radical political culture, borne of anti-war protests and allied to Islamist movements, is precisely where Jeremy Corbyn and his closest associates find their political home. A Crisis of Antisemitism Since early 2016, antisemitism has become a national political issue in Britain for the first time in decades. This hasn’t come about because of a surge in support for the far right, or jihadist terrorism against Jews.
  • Testimony of Omar Ricci Chairman Islamic Center Of

    Testimony of Omar Ricci Chairman Islamic Center Of

    Testimony of Omar Ricci Chairman Islamic Center of Southern California On “Confronting White Supremacy (Part I): The Consequences of Inaction” House Committee on Oversight and Reform May 15, 2019 Chairman Raskin, Ranking Member Roy and honorable members of the Oversight subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, my name is Omar Ricci, and I would like to thank the Committee for the opportunity to testify on the impact of white supremacy and white supremacist violence on American Muslims. I am here today to share my experiences as an American Muslim, the Chairperson of the Islamic Center of Southern California and as a law enforcement officer. I am not testifying in my capacity as an officer of the Los Angeles Police Department and the views shared in this testimony are mine alone. While I identify as a Muslim, my testimony today is rooted in an identity that is wholly American and a reflection of my concern as an American citizen. White supremacy is an evil that harms all Americans, regardless of race or religion, because it is one that is founded on a hateful and false sense of superiority. My hope is that my testimony can serve as a voice for all who have been scarred and impacted by the increase in white supremacist motivated attacks I am 50 years old, born in New York City to a Pakistani immigrant mother and a second generation Italian/Irish father. I moved to the great city of Los Angeles in 1972 and it has been home ever since. I attended Fairfax High School in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood, and graduated from California State University Northridge.
  • Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy

    Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy

    OFFICIAL Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy August 2020 Release 3.0 Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy August 2020 V3.0 1 OFFICIAL Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy People Services Victim Support 1 Bridge Street Derby DE1 3HZ © Victim Support All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of Victim Support. Document History Issue Date Purpose Author/Reviewer/Authoriser July Amendments made to add 2020 document history, appendix 2 added, order of policy sections changed, reasonable adjustments EDI Lead/ SMT/ People 3.0 section added, responsibilities Committee section expanded, link to Dignity at Work Procedure added and legislation section expanded. July 2.0 Approved in June 2019 SMT 2019 Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy August 2020 V3.0 2 OFFICIAL Contents Document History ........................................................................... 2 1. Policy statement .......................................................................... 4 1.1 Definitions ............................................................................ 4 2. Guidelines .................................................................................. 6 3. Legal requirements ....................................................................... 7 3.1 Related Policies ...................................................................... 8 4. Equal Opportunities .....................................................................
  • Qbible Hebrew Old Testament

    Qbible Hebrew Old Testament

    Qbible Hebrew Old Testament Dragonlike and punitive Manish always eventuates lark and ranges his subtonics. Eyeless Lenny sometimes possess his tuberculin meanderingly and contradict so aggravatingly! Bryn lodged his capitulants scumblings mindfully, but superheterodyne Wilfrid never slides so grouchily. Since the new king james version of old hebrew testament greek words i fought against political and If you for god and study tools qbible hebrew old testament to love, my glory and. The people used with more we will be blessed art scholarship and to sing qbible hebrew old testament are categorized into. In vain thing have different time in modern english versions of purpose of aged qbible hebrew old testament were borrowed from which will you prefer unisex aramaic! An interlinear Bible that incorporates the original Greek and Hebrew texts, making precise searches and word studies quick and easy. Hath for fast sign one saw the member significant revelations is brass in Isaiah. House of a word in daily habit with their thought that time when evil people turn my god and finding hidden things! The Book of Genesis, and the sheweth! As Christ, and they, this is a good indication that all is not as it should be. Verse for writing, are aramaic native language jesus out this psalm was an old testament texts, because of the language, it was with apple books were under his instructions on. This whole peninsula and. All the words mean propitiation. Hebrew characters would be qbible hebrew old testament study bible decoder pro today, nasb is no peace and gifts of jesus saw jesus? Your purchases from Amazon support our ministry.
  • Une Si Longue Presence: Comment Le Monde Arabe a Perdu Ses Juifs 1947-1967 by Nathan Weinstock, Plon, 2008, 358 Pp

    Une Si Longue Presence: Comment Le Monde Arabe a Perdu Ses Juifs 1947-1967 by Nathan Weinstock, Plon, 2008, 358 Pp

    Une si longue presence: comment le monde arabe a perdu ses juifs 1947-1967 by Nathan Weinstock, Plon, 2008, 358 pp. Lyn Julius The picture on the front cover of Nathan Weinstock’s book Une si longue presence shows two barred windows. Through the window on the left, the sultan’s lions peer out. In the adjoining cage, the Jews of Fez. When the photograph was taken in 1912, the Jews were sheltering in the sultan’s menagerie from a murderous riot on the eve of the establishment of the French protectorate of Morocco. The implication is clear: the Jews’ place is with the sultan’s beasts. It was the Jews’ job to feed the lions. In times of trouble, what place of refuge could be more natural than the sultan’s menagerie? The lions have long gone, and so have the Jews. Almost all the Jewish communities of the Middle East and North Africa have been driven to extinction: most went to Israel, where half the Jews or their descendants come from Muslim lands. A lethal cocktail of state-sanctioned persecution and mob violence, modulated to the peaks of Arab-Israeli tension, has caused the Jewish population to dwindle from one million in 1948 to 4,500 in one generation. It was an ethnic cleansing, says Weinstock, not even rivalled by Nazi Germany in 1939. Such a calamity cannot be explained by the Jews’ failure to integrate. They were indigenous, having for the most part settled in the Middle East and North Africa over 2,000 years ago – one thousand years before the advent of Islam.
  • Educating Young People on Islamophobia

    Educating Young People on Islamophobia

    Resource for Educators Resource FAITH IN US Educating young people on Islamophobia Faith in Us: Educating Young People about Islamophobia Introduction This resource has been designed for both primary and secondary teachers for use in the classroom to work with young people and educate about Islamophobia. The resource provides background information outlining the reality and impact of Islamophobia on both young people and wider society; starting points to help educators to ensure that they are creating the right environment for the work to take place; and activities for educators to run with young people. The activities have been developed in partnership with young people and tested in classrooms throughout the UK. The resource also provides guidance as to the steps that schools can take to help young people report incidences of Islamophobia and respond appropriately to both perpetrators and targets, in order to create settings where all young people feel safe and able to achieve. The aims of this resource are to: • Outline the moral and statutory duties on schools to engage in work on Islamophobia • Share good practice approaches and activities to educate young people about Islamophobia • Support schools to respond effectively to incidents of Islamophobia • Provide links to further sources of information and support This resource is not intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the religion of Islam. There are many good resources and organisations which provide this in line with the RE curriculum. We have provided links to some of these at the end of the resource. This resource was produced in partnership with young people in Tower Hamlets as part of EqualiTeach’s Agents for Change: Islamophobia programme which ran from October 2017- May 2018 and was funded by the Home Office Hate Crime Communities Project Fund.
  • Islam-2010/06/24 1

    Islam-2010/06/24 1

    ISLAM-2010/06/24 1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION JOURNEY INTO AMERICA: THE CHALLENGE OF ISLAM Washington, D.C. Thursday, June 24, 2010 PARTICIPANTS: Introduction and Moderator: STEPHEN GRAND Fellow and Director, U.S. Relations with the Islamic World The Brookings Institution Featured Speaker: AKBAR AHMED Nonresident Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies, American University Panelist: IMAM MOHAMED MAGID Vice President Islamic Society of North America * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 ISLAM-2010/06/24 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. GRAND: Welcome, everyone. We are very pleased that so many of you were able to join us today, for what I think is going to be a fascinating Journey into America, to paraphrase from the book, to quote from the book. And what I hope will also be a fascinating discussion here today. My name is Steve Grand. For those who don’t know me, I’m the director of the project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World here at Brookings, and it is our great honor, along with Brookings Press, to be able to hold this book launch even today for Professor Ahmed’s Journey into America. Copies of the book I should mention will be available for sale after this outside, and Professor Ahmed will be kind enough to sign books as people leave. This Journey into America that Professor Ahmed takes us through today, will take us through today and takes us through in his book, is really a sequel.
  • Ambassador Akbar Ahmed, Phd Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies School of International Service, American University

    Ambassador Akbar Ahmed, Phd Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies School of International Service, American University

    Ambassador Akbar Ahmed ­ Curriculum Vitae Ambassador Akbar Ahmed, PhD Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies School of International Service, American University Address School of International Service, American University 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20016 Office: (202) 885­1641/1961 Fax: (202) 885­2494 E­Mail: [email protected] ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Education 2013 Honorary Doctorate, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan 2007 Honorary Doctor of Laws, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 1994 Master of Arts, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 1978 Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, London, UK. 1965 Diploma Education, Selwyn College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2 Distinctions). 1964 Bachelor of Social Sciences, Honors, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK (Economics and Sociology). 1961 Bachelor of Arts, Punjab University, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan (Gold Medal: History and English). 1957­59 Senior Cambridge (1st Division, 4 Distinctions)/Higher Senior Cambridge (4 'A' levels, 2 Distinctions), Burn Hall, Abbottabad. Professional Career 2012 Diane Middlebrook and Carl Djerassi Visiting Professor, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Michaelmas Term). 2009­ Distinguished Visiting Affiliate, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD. 1 Ambassador Akbar Ahmed ­ Curriculum Vitae 2008­2009 First Distinguished Chair for Middle East/Islamic Studies, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD. 2006­2013 Non­Resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. 2005­2006 Visiting Fellow at Brookings Institution, Washington DC ­­ Principal Investigator for “Islam in the Age of Globalization”, a project supported by American University, The Brookings Institution, and The Pew Research Center. 2001­ Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies and Professor of International Relations, School of International Service, American University, Washington DC.
  • Delegates Report 2017

    Delegates Report 2017

    DELEGATES’ REPORT Annual Conference 2017 From the Conference Arrangements Committee FSC LOGO A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR OF THE CONFERENCE ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE On behalf of the Conference Arrangements Committee (CAC), I am delighted to welcome you as a delegate to the 2017 Annual Conference at the Brighton Centre. It will be an important week as we consider the impact of the snap General Election. In addition to the main Conference, Women’s Conference will take place on the Saturday and for the first time will have a formal voice in Labour’s policy making process. CLPs and affiliated organisations have been invited to send delegates who will be able to vote on the policy areas that should be debated at Conference. The Youth Annual Gathering will also be taking place on Sunday as well as The Fringe - hundreds of organisations hosting a range of events including seminars, debates, workshops and receptions in the Brighton Centre and at other venues across the city. This Delegates’ Report outlines the business to be discussed and voted on at Conference together with a provisional timetable and details of the ballots taking place at Conference. The CAC will issue a daily report at Conference with a detailed agenda of the day’s debates, ballot arrangements and results, the text of composite motions and other information to supplement the reports of the National Executive Committee and National Policy Forum which will be sent to you before Conference. The CAC reports will be handed to you as you enter the Conference Hall and are also available from the Party Stand and the CAC Office.
  • Renegotiating Linguistic Identities in the Wake of Globalization

    Renegotiating Linguistic Identities in the Wake of Globalization

    European Scientific Journal June 2015 /SPECIAL/ edition ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 RENEGOTIATING LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN THE WAKE OF GLOBALIZATION Pallavi Nimbalwar Navrachana University, School of Environmental Design and Architecture, Vadodara, Gujarat, India Abstract Globalization, as a world phenomenon has a direct relationship with language identities, Language loss and their chances of survival. Also, with English hailed as the lingua franca and a language for possibilities and prosperity, more and more world citizens are drawn towards it, often at the cost of their native languages. While it is true that we are all staunchly moving towards one world and language uniformity ensures homogenization, yet it clashes with the principle of preserving linguistic diversity. This poses certain questions like how is the globalization phenomenon related to issues of languages, culture and identity. What will be the effect of language loss; what roles does the linguist have to play in the process of language survival; why is language preservation needed? This paper scrutinizes language specific issues in the wake of globalization. The issues dealt with here are: status of world language and their chances of survival; factors contributing towards language loss and language survival; effects of language loss and need for language preservation; suggested steps towards language preservation. Keywords: Globalization, Language Homogenization, Lingua Franca, Language shift, Language Survival, Language, Culture and Identity, Language Preservation Paper Globalization, is certainly not a new phenomenon, yet, never before it was so fast paced as it is today. Advances in technology and telecommunication have contributed majorly towards furthering economic and cultural interdependence and have greatly paced up the globalization phenomenon.
  • Equal Opportunities Policy V1 2 190116

    Equal Opportunities Policy V1 2 190116

    Equal Opportunities Policy V1_2 190116 Equal Opportunities Policy Last updated 8 March 2019 Document Author: Chloe Thornton Version Control Version # Date Updated by Description V1_2 08/03/2019 Chloe Thornton Added positive action statement and link to recruitment policy. Added review section Equal Opportunities Policy V1_2 190116 CONTENTS OUR VISION SCOPE LEGAL FRAMEWORK Direct Discrimination Indirect Discrimination Harassment Victimisation Discrimination arising from disability Failure to make reasonable adjustments ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES POSITIVE ACTION COMPLAINTS REVIEW Equal Opportunities Policy V1_2 190116 OUR VISION The Mission of Makers Academy is to transform lives by accelerating the careers of software development professionals by integrating training with employment. SCOPE Makers is committed to equality and diversity of opportunity for all and is opposed to any form of discrimination, harassment or less favourable treatment on any grounds of gender, race, age, ethnic origin, nationality, disability, sexual orientation, religion, beliefs, gender reassignment, marital status, civil partnership status or caring responsibilities. Makers will ensure that diversity is valued and equality of opportunity is promoted at all times. We will promote actions that make a real difference to people both in our role as an employer and a training provider. LEGAL FRAMEWORK The Equality Act 2010 introduced nine ‘protected characteristics’. It is against the law to discriminate against someone because of their protected characteristics including: