Surveying Biodiversity of Soil Herpetofauna: Towards A· Standard Quantitative Methodology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Surveying Biodiversity of Soil Herpetofauna: Towards A· Standard Quantitative Methodology Available online at www.sciencedirect.com -" EUROl'fAH JOURAAL OF -;;- ScienceDirect SOll BIOLOGY ELSEVIER European Journal of Soil Biology 42 (2006) SI03-S110 http://france.elsevier.comldirectlejsobi Original article Surveying biodiversity of soil herpetofauna: towards a· standard quantitative methodology G.J. Measey* Laboratoire d'Ecologie des Sols Tropicaux (UMR 137), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), 32, avenue Henri-Varagnat, 93143 Bondy cedex, France Available online 07 August 2006 Abstract Soil herpetofauna biodiversity is conservatively estimated as 2775 species, made up of 10% and 28% of Amphibia and Squa­ mata, respectively. Neglect in their taxonomy, ecology and standard samp\ing methodologies suggests that proportions, as weIl as numbers, are \ikely to be far higher. Like invertebrate soil macrofauna, the majority ofspecies \ive within the first few centimetres of leaf \itter and soil. Results of 30 quantitative and 52 semi-quantitative surveys in nine regions of three continents show that these are infrequently encountered, whereas dedicated subterranean burrowers can be found at high densities, up to 0.844 indivi­ duals m-2 (x = 0.26). This suggests that a two tier sampling approach may be most appropriate, with superficial excavations in a 2 large quadrat (e.g. 25 m ) in addition to a smaller deeper subsample. It is hoped that this contribution will stimulate further discussion towards a consensus, filling the gap for a standard method ofquantitative surveying of soil herpetofauna biodiversity. © 2006 Elsevier Masson SAS. AlI rights reserved. Keywords: Standardised sUlVeys; Scolecophidian snakes; Gymnophiona; Amphisbaenians 1. Introduction fauna, re1ying on natura1 historians and the simp1y cur­ ious depositing specimens in museum collections [5]. It is wide1y recognised that soi1 flom and fauna have A1though these va1uab1e specimens have served as a 1agged behind their terrestria1 counterparts in terms of usefu1 starting point, many species are on1y known eco10gica1 studies [1]. Furthermore, the re1ative1y few from the very few individua1s that were originally co1­ taxonomie studies on soi! organisms have resu1ted in an 1ected [6], and sometimes important detai1s are missing under appreciation of their importance to biodiversity from information associated with these specimens [7]. [2]. Soi1 herpetofauna, reptiles and amphibians, are no Even when collections have been extensive1y documen­ exception. For examp1e, Biju and Bossuyt [3] recentIy ted, resu1ting data can be of 1imited comparative use described a new fami1y of anurans from a single speci­ un1ess standard samp1ing methodo10gies have been fo1­ men of a fossoria1 species, a feat considered to be simi­ 10wed. At present, for soi! herpetofauna, no wide1y lar to the first discovery of a living coe1acanth [4]. accepted standard samp1ing methods exist [8,9]. Historically, the discovery and description of soi! Do we need standard techniques to survey the bio­ herpetofauna has been 1ike that of all other flora and diversity ofsoi! herpetofauna? Biodiversity assessments require proven techniques [8], and it is becoming c1ear • Tel.: +33 1 48 02 59 62; fax: +33 1 48 02 59 70. that these are not capable of finding apparentIy com­ E-mail address:[email protected] (G.I. Measey). mon fossoria1 herpetofauna1 taxa [lO,ll]. C1ear1y for 1164-5563/$ - see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Masson SAS. Ail rights reselVed. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.034 8104 G.J. Measey 1 European Jal/mal ofSail Biology 42 (2006) SI03-8110 the taxa concemed special searching methods are result) most soil herpetofauna appear to be concentrated required which should be standardised for comparative in the upper layers of the soil and its associated litter. It purposes. Including searches which provide estimates is for these reasons that a sensu lato definition of soil of soil herpetofauna presence or abundance would (see above) is seen as the most appropriate to adopt. It increase the value of biodiversity surveys in the soil is recognised that as more, particularly ecological, ecosystem. Wolters [12] noted that alteration in species information becomes available on these groups, better composition is probably not a random process, and it working definitions may appear. may be that soil herpetofauna (and amphibians in parti­ All orders of Amphibia have soil dwelling represen­ cular) as top predators might act as indicators of wider tatives and one, the Gymnophiona or caecilians, are problems in the soil community, just as they are known almost entirely made up of limbless, tropical, subterra­ to do in terrestrial and aquatic systems [13]. nean species (Table 1). Many salamanders (Caudata) The purpose of this contribution is to: 1. Provide an are soi1 dwelling for part of their lives, and sorne appreciation of the biodiversity of soil herpetofauna, frogs regularly burrow into the soil, leaving this refuge with a preliminary attempt at quantification of the num­ for on1y relatively short periods [19]. The global distri­ ber ofspecies; and 2. to critically compare the results of bution of amphibians has recent1y been discussed, with semi-quantitative and quantitative soil herpetofauna the majority of species being found within the forested biodiversity surveys in order to move toward a standard tropics [20]. methodology. Among the Reptilia only the arder Squamata is con­ sidered here. No members of the arder Crocodilia are 2. An appreciation of the biodiversity of soil recognised as being primarily subterranean, despite herpetofauna constructing burrows. Tuatams (arder Rhynchocepha­ lia) inhabit burrows and occasionally eat soil macro­ At first inspection, two soil herpetofauna groups fauna but the majority of prey are not of subtermnean appear to be separated ecologically: those which use or leaf litter origin. Sorne tortoises and turtles (arder the soil (sensu lato, including leaf litter, wood, etc. Testudines), especially within the family Testudinidae, [2]) as a refuge (often for aestivation, or diel!noctumal construct and inhabit burrows, although as none eat soil refuge with relatively stable tempemture, pH, humid­ macrofauna (instead foraging herbivorously on the sur­ ity), and those which are truly s!1btermnean for the face) they are also excluded from this discussion. majority of their lives, reproducing in the soil, eating Table 1 highlights several groups which are exclu­ soil macrofauna, and rare1y reaching the surface. How­ sively subterranean, in particular the amphisbaenians ever, the two groups are not so easily differentiated, especially when the life history of most soil herpeto­ and scolocophidian snakes. Another reason why biodi­ fauna is unknown. Intermediary forms are known versity ofsoil herpetofauna is often underappreciated is (subtermnean-terrestrial or subtermnean-aquatic [14, the superficial resemb1ance of sorne forms due to their 15]) which makes the assessment even more ·difficult. subterranean lifestyle (Fig. 1). Many species have Use of the soil may also be related to ontogeny [15], undergone body elongation, lost limbs, have similar and to complicate matters further, there are certain spe­ feeding mechanics, skin and scale structure, and cies which appear to be flexible enough to be either changes in sensory systems (e.g. reduction of eyes completely subtermnean or predominant1y epigeic and covering of orbit, Fig. 1) These superficial resem­ depending on the habitat in which they are found blances are partly responsib1e for inappropriate taxo­ [16]. That notwithstanding, the inclusion of these taxa nomie determinations as even closely related species within soil fauna is demonstmted by their dependence may appear similar morphologically. on soil macroinvertebrate prey items [16-18]. Difficulties in taxonomy, lack ofsufficient sampling, Given these difficulties and the overwhelming lack and an inadequate understanding of ecology are prob­ ofecological data on the majority ofspecies involved, it ably the major impediments to determining an accurate is doubtful that working definitions separating groups estimate for the total biodiversity of soil herpetofauna. are useful. However, it is important to bear in mind that More important1y, it is considered that these are more there is almost certainly a gradation of life styles extreme in soil dwelling species than their terrestrial or between the extremes of animaIs which rare1y enter aquatic counterparts. Hence both proportions and num­ the soil (sensu stricto), and those that mrely leave it. bers of species given in Table 1 are thought to be con­ Rather like their soi1 macrofauna prey (or perhaps as a servative estimates. G,J. Measey 1 European Journal ofSoi! Biology 42 (2006) S103-S110 SI05 Table 1 Numbers ofsoil dwelling species ofsquamate reptiles and amphibians, Taxonomy and species numbers were taken from AmphibiaWeb (http://elib, cs,berkeley.edulaw/- accessed 10-08-04) and Animal Diversity Web (http://animaldiversity.urnrnz.umich.edu - accessed 10-08-04). See text for criteria of inclusion in soil vertebrates Taxon Common name Soil dwe11ing Total species Percent soil species dwelling RePTILIA Reptiles Order Squamala 2209 7879 28.0 Suborder Sauria Lizards Gekkota Geckos, blind lizards and legless lizards 50 1101 4.5 Diploglossa Glass lizards, American legless lizards, 103 117 88.0 knob-scaled lizards, etc Iguania 19uanas, chameleons, anoles, etc 0 1633 0.0 Platynota Monitor lizards 0 57 0.0 Scincomorpha Skinks, whiptails, night lizards, etc 1244 1919 64.8 Suborder Amphisbaenia Worm lizards 158
Recommended publications
  • REVISION O F the AFRICAN Caeclllan GENUS
    REVISION OFTHE AFRICAN CAEClLlAN GENUS SCHISTOMETOPUM PARKER (AMPH IBIA: CYMNOPHIONA: CAECILI IDAE) BY RONALD A. NU AND MICHAEL E. PFRENDER MISCELLANEC JS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 18Fb; ' Ann Arbor, September 2 7, 1 998 ISSN 076-8405 MIS(:ELIANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, LJNTVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 187 The publicatioils of the M~~sclunof Zoology, The [Jniversity of Michigan, consist PI-irnarilyof two series-the Occasion:~lPapers allti the Miscellaneous Publicatio~ls.Both series were founded by Dc Bryant Walker, Mr. Rradshaw H. Swales, anti Dr. W.W. Newcornb. Occasionally the Museuni publishes contributiorls outside of these series; begirlnirlg in 1990 these are titled Special Publicatio~lsa~ld arc numbered. All submitted ~n;inl~scriptsreceive external review. The Misccllarieous Publications, which include ~l~ollographicstltdies, papers on field and ~II- seuln techniques, and other contributions 11ot within the scope of the Occasio~lalPapers, are pl~b- lishcd separately. It is not intended that they be grouped into volumes. Each 11r11nberhas a title page and, when necessary, a table of co1itelits. Tllc Occasional Papel-s, publication of which was begun in 1913, servc as a medium Sol- original studies based prirlcipally upon the collections in the Museurn. They are issurtl separately. MThen a sufficient number of pages has hcen printed to niakc a volume, a title pagc, table of contenb, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. A cornplete list of publications on Birds, Fishes, Insects, Mammals, Moll~~sks,Rcpdles and Amphib- ians, and other topics is available. Address inquiries to the Directt)r, Muse~unof Zoolohy, The lir~ivcr- sity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigarl 48109-1079.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioseries12-Amphibians-Taita-English
    0c m 12 Symbol key 3456 habitat pond puddle river stream 78 underground day / night day 9101112131415161718 night altitude high low vegetation types shamba forest plantation prelim pages ENGLISH.indd ii 2009/10/22 02:03:47 PM SANBI Biodiversity Series Amphibians of the Taita Hills by G.J. Measey, P.K. Malonza and V. Muchai 2009 prelim pages ENGLISH.indd Sec1:i 2009/10/27 07:51:49 AM SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 September 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include responsibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and ora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editor: Gerrit Germishuizen Design & layout: Elizma Fouché Cover design: Elizma Fouché How to cite this publication MEASEY, G.J., MALONZA, P.K. & MUCHAI, V. 2009. Amphibians of the Taita Hills / Am bia wa milima ya Taita. SANBI Biodiversity Series 12. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca
    Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca John F. Lamoreux, Meghan W. McKnight, and Rodolfo Cabrera Hernandez Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 53 Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca John F. Lamoreux, Meghan W. McKnight, and Rodolfo Cabrera Hernandez Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 53 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organizations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Lamoreux, J. F., McKnight, M. W., and R. Cabrera Hernandez (2015). Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xxiv + 320pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1717-3 DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2015.SSC-OP.53.en Cover photographs: Totontepec landscape; new Plectrohyla species, Ixalotriton niger, Concepción Pápalo, Thorius minutissimus, Craugastor pozo (panels, left to right) Back cover photograph: Collecting in Chamula, Chiapas Photo credits: The cover photographs were taken by the authors under grant agreements with the two main project funders: NGS and CEPF.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibiaweb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth
    AmphibiaWeb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth Created and Illustrated by the 2020-2021 AmphibiaWeb URAP Team: Alice Drozd, Arjun Mehta, Ash Reining, Kira Wiesinger, and Ann T. Chang This introduction to amphibians was written by University of California, Berkeley AmphibiaWeb Undergraduate Research Apprentices for people who love amphibians. Thank you to the many AmphibiaWeb apprentices over the last 21 years for their efforts. Edited by members of the AmphibiaWeb Steering Committee CC BY-NC-SA 2 Dedicated in loving memory of David B. Wake Founding Director of AmphibiaWeb (8 June 1936 - 29 April 2021) Dave Wake was a dedicated amphibian biologist who mentored and educated countless people. With the launch of AmphibiaWeb in 2000, Dave sought to bring the conservation science and basic fact-based biology of all amphibians to a single place where everyone could access the information freely. Until his last day, David remained a tirelessly dedicated scientist and ally of the amphibians of the world. 3 Table of Contents What are Amphibians? Their Characteristics ...................................................................................... 7 Orders of Amphibians.................................................................................... 7 Where are Amphibians? Where are Amphibians? ............................................................................... 9 What are Bioregions? ..................................................................................10 Conservation of Amphibians Why Save Amphibians? .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caecilia Guntheri Dunn, 1942 (Gymnophiona, Caeciliidae) in Central America
    17 2 NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 17 (2): 649–653 https://doi.org/10.15560/17.2.649 First record of Caecilia guntheri Dunn, 1942 (Gymnophiona, Caeciliidae) in Central America Luis C. Elizondo-Lara Programa de Maestría en Ciencias Biológicas, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado, Universidad de Panamá, Panama City, Panama • luis. [email protected]; [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8647-6717 Departamento de Fisiología y Comportamiento Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Exactas y Tecnología, Universidad de Panamá, Panama City, Panama Red Mesoamericana y del Caribe para la Conservación de Anfibios y Reptiles Abstract I report the first encounter in Central America of an individual of Caecilia guntheri Dunn, 1942 (Gymnophiona, Caeciliidae). The individual was observed and collected in a primary evergreen submontane forest in Cerro Pirre, Darien Province, Republic of Panama. It was identified mainly by the low counts of secondary and primary folds. The encounter of this individual of C. guntheri highlights the disjunct populations and apparently the results of dispersion of this species from South to Central America by biotic exchange as result of the closure of the Isthmus of Panama. Keywords Amphibians, biotic exchange, Cerro Pirre, Darien, disjunct distribution, Panama Academic editor: Javier Ernesto Cortés Suárez | Received 28 December 2020 | Accepted 28 March 2021 | Published 13 April 2021 Citation: Elizondo-Lara LC (2021) First record of Caecilia guntheri Dunn, 1942 (Gymnophiona, Caeciliidae) in Central America. Check List 17 (2): 649–653. https://doi.org/10.15560/17.2.649 Introduction The genus Caecilia Linnaeus, 1758 was described from Rica (Köhler 2011; Kubicki and Arias 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Care and Parentage in a Skin-Feeding Caecilian Amphibian ALEXANDER KUPFER1,2Ã, MARK WILKINSON2, DAVID J
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY 309A:460–467 (2008) A Journal of Integrative Biology Care and Parentage in a Skin-Feeding Caecilian Amphibian ALEXANDER KUPFER1,2Ã, MARK WILKINSON2, DAVID J. GOWER2, 1–3 4,5 HENDRIK MU¨ LLER , AND ROBERT JEHLE 1Institut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-Universita¨t Jena, Jena, Germany 2Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom 3Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands 4School of Environment and Life Sciences, Centre for Environmental Systems Research, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom 5Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom ABSTRACT An exceptional form of parental care has recently been discovered in a poorly known caecilian amphibian. Mothers of the Taita Hills (Kenya) endemic Boulengerula taitanus provide their own skin as a food source for their offspring. Field data suggest that nursing is costly. Females found attending young had a lower body condition and fat body volume than nonbrooding and egg-incubating females, and the female condition decreased substantially during parental care. Most mothers and their eggs or offspring were found in close proximity to other nesting females, in high-density nest sites that enhance the potential for social interactions and highlighting the possibility of communal breeding. Parentage was investigated using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) genetic markers in 29 offspring from six litters guarded by putative mothers. Our data provide the first evidence of multiple paternity in a caecilian, implying that two fathers sired one litter. Some young from two litters had genotypes not matching the guarding female suggesting that not all offspring are cared for by their biological mothers.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Evolution and Modularity of the Caecilian Skull Carla Bardua1,2* , Mark Wilkinson1, David J
    Bardua et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019) 19:30 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1342-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Morphological evolution and modularity of the caecilian skull Carla Bardua1,2* , Mark Wilkinson1, David J. Gower1, Emma Sherratt3 and Anjali Goswami1,2 Abstract Background: Caecilians (Gymnophiona) are the least speciose extant lissamphibian order, yet living forms capture approximately 250 million years of evolution since their earliest divergences. This long history is reflected in the broad range of skull morphologies exhibited by this largely fossorial, but developmentally diverse, clade. However, this diversity of form makes quantification of caecilian cranial morphology challenging, with highly variable presence or absence of many structures. Consequently, few studies have examined morphological evolution across caecilians. This extensive variation also raises the question of degree of conservation of cranial modules (semi-autonomous subsets of highly-integrated traits) within this clade, allowing us to assess the importance of modular organisation in shaping morphological evolution. We used an intensive surface geometric morphometric approach to quantify cranial morphological variation across all 32 extant caecilian genera. We defined 16 cranial regions using 53 landmarks and 687 curve and 729 surface sliding semilandmarks. With these unprecedented high-dimensional data, we analysed cranial shape and modularity across caecilians assessing phylogenetic, allometric and ecological influences on cranial evolution, as well as investigating the relationships among integration, evolutionary rate, and morphological disparity. Results: We found highest support for a ten-module model, with greater integration of the posterior skull. Phylogenetic signal was significant (Kmult =0.87,p < 0.01), but stronger in anterior modules, while allometric influences were also significant (R2 =0.16,p < 0.01), but stronger posteriorly.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Rain Frog from Namaqualand, South Africa (Anura: Brevicipitidae: Breviceps)
    Zootaxa 3381: 62–68 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of Rain Frog from Namaqualand, South Africa (Anura: Brevicipitidae: Breviceps) ALAN CHANNING Biodiversity and Conservation Biology Department, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7525, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Breviceps branchi sp. nov. is described from coastal Namaqualand, South Africa. It is most similar to Breviceps na- maquensis in colour pattern and overall form, from which it differs by hand and foot morphology and 16S rRNA sequence. Key words: Breviceps, new species, Namaqualand, 16S rRNA, South Africa Introduction The genus Breviceps is known from South Africa northwards to Kenya, and as far west as Angola, with the closely related Balebreviceps found in Ethiopia (IUCN 2011). There are presently 15 species recognised (Frost 2011). The early taxonomy of the genus Breviceps was reviewed by Power (1926), by which time seven species were already known, including the Namaqualand endemics, B. macrops and B. namaquensis. Power (1926) discussed a number of characters that might be useful in separating species of rain frogs. On the basis of differences in 16S rRNA and morphology, I describe a new species of Breviceps from Namaqualand. Material and methods Sampling. A single specimen was collected in Namaqualand, South Africa. A small tissue sample was removed from thigh muscle, and the specimen was fixed in formalin for 24 h, then transferred to 70% ethanol for deposition in the herpetological collection of the Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University, Berlin (ZMB).
    [Show full text]
  • Correction (934.7Kb)
    Correction Correction: Population Genetics of the Sa˜o Tome´ Caecilian (Gymnophiona: Dermophiidae: Schistometopum thomense) Reveals Strong Geographic Structuring The PLOS ONE Staff The parameter name in the Materials and Methods section and Results section are incorrectly formatted. In all cases, the correct parameter name is Fu’s Fs. The genetic variability measure in the Results section is incorrectly formatted. The correct genetic variability measure is FST. The Figure 1 legend is incorrect. The word ‘‘Red’’ should be ‘‘Black’’ in the last sentence. The authors have provided a corrected version here. Citation: The PLOS ONE Staff (2014) Correction: Population Genetics of the Sa˜o Tome´ Caecilian (Gymnophiona: Dermophiidae: Schistometopum thomense) Reveals Strong Geographic Structuring. PLoS ONE 9(12): e116005. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0116005 Published December 15, 2014 Copyright: ß 2014 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 December 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 12 | e116005 Figure 1. Schistometopum thomense collection localities, Sa˜o Tome´, Republic of Sa˜o Tome´ and Prı´ncipe. Numbers in parentheses indicate number of specimens available for genetic analyses. Legend indicates specimens used in Splits Tree, Bayesian, SAMOVA, and/or IMa2 analyses, or discussed by Nussbaum and Pfrender [36] in morphological comparisons. Dashed, red ovals indicate populations lumped for SAMOVA analyses. Photographs show examples of clear and flecked morphs as Schistometopum thomense and Schistometopum ‘‘ephele’’, respectively. Red star in lower left panel indicates relative position of Sa˜o Tome´ to continental Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) from the Techniques, and Recent Predictions Western Ghats of Goa and Karnataka (Dinesh Et Al
    JoTT NOTE 2(8): 1105-1108 New site records of Gegeneophis upsurge in the description of new goaensis and G. mhadeiensis species in Gegeneophis may be due to optimization of surveying (Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) from the techniques, and recent predictions Western Ghats of Goa and Karnataka (Dinesh et al. 2009) indicate future discovery of new species from this genus. 1 2 Gopalakrishna Bhatta , K.P. Dinesh , Gegeneophis goaensis was described by Bhatta et 3 4 P. Prashanth , Nirmal U. Kulkarni & al. (2007a) from Keri Village, Sattari Taluk, North Goa 5 C. Radhakrishnan District, Goa based on a set of three specimens collected in September 2006 and July 2008. G. mhadeiensis 1 Department of Biology, BASE Educational Service Pvt. Ltd., was described in 2007 from Chorla Village, Khanapur Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560004, India 2,5 Zoological Survey of India, Western Ghat Regional Centre, Taluk, Belgaum District, Karnataka from a set of three Eranhipalam, Kozhikode, Kerala 673006, India specimens collected during 2006 (Bhatta et al. 2007b). 3 Agumbe Rainforest Research Station, Agumbe, Karnataka During our recent explorations for these secretive animals 577411, India 4 in the bordering districts of Maharashtra (Sindhudurg), Hiru Naik Building, Dhuler Mapusa, Goa 403507, India Email: 2 [email protected] (corresponding author) Goa (North Goa) and Karnataka (Belgaum), we collected an individual of G. goaensis (Image 1) below the soil heap surrounding a banana plantation in Chorla In India the order Gymnophiona Müller is represented Village (Karnataka) on 05 August 2009 (Table 1). All by 26 species under four genera in two families (Dinesh the morphological and morphometric details were in et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History Observations on a Warty Frog: Callulina Dawida (Amphibia: Brevicipitidae) in the Taita Hills, Kenya
    International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Zoology Volume 2012, Article ID 212491, 9 pages doi:10.5402/2012/212491 Research Article Natural History Observations on a Warty Frog: Callulina dawida (Amphibia: Brevicipitidae) in the Taita Hills, Kenya Patrick K. Malonza Section of Herpetology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Correspondence should be addressed to Patrick K. Malonza, [email protected] Received 16 November 2011; Accepted 26 December 2011 Academic Editors: B. I. Crother, P. V. Lindeman, T. Miyata, A. Robins, T. H. Struck, and B. E. Washburn Copyright © 2012 Patrick K. Malonza. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Amphibian populations are declining throughout the world, but most of the susceptible species possess particular biological attributes. Understanding these traits plus the environmental factors responsible for declines greatly aids conservation prioritization and planning. This paper examines the natural history observations and ecological characteristics of Callulina dawida, a frog endemic to the montane forests of the Taita Hills, Kenya. Sampling was accomplished by use of standardized pitfall trapping, transects, and time-limited searches. Mean monthly temperature and elevation significantly influenced the species distribution and abundance but mean monthly rainfall did not. The species was rare or absent during the cold season and its abundance increased with elevation. Breeding occurred during the long dry season (June to October) with juveniles being abundant between January and March. Available evidence shows that this species deposits a cluster of large yolk-rich eggs on the forest floor with maternal care and direct development.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 24 September 2013
    ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2014), Volume 2, Issue 1, 802-809 Journal homepage: http://www.journalijar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE Karyology of the East African caecilian Schistometopum gregorii (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) from the Tana River Delta, Kenya Venu Govindappa Centre for Applied Genetics, Department of Zoology, Bangalore University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Manuscript Info Abstract Manuscript History: This report presents a male somatic karyotype (2N=22; FN=40) and late meiotic stages of Schistometopum gregorii that seems to fall in line with that Received: 11 November 2013 Final Accepted: 22 December 2013 of other taxa of the family Dermophiidae. In view of a different basic Published Online: January 2014 chromosome number prevailing for this species as well for this group, it appears possible to predict that this East African species posits more closely Key words: related towards Indian endemic Indotyphlidae. Schistometopum gregorii, Giemsa stained chromosomes, meiosis, karyotype. Copy Right, IJAR, 2014,. All rights reserved. Introduction Caecilians are the limbless and elongate amphibians that form the third extant order of Amphibia and are recognised by approximately 190 species (Frost, 2013; Nishikawa et al., 2013). They are sparsely distributed in the wet or moist tropics (except Madagascar) east of the Wallace line (Himstedt, 1996; Kamei et al., 2012). African caecilians (excluding the Seychelles) are represented by about 21 species (Gower et al., 2005), most of which are known from the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al., 2000). The coastal forests of eastern Africa contain remarkable levels of biodiversity which have been formally recognised by their reclassification into the Coastal Forests of Eastern Africa, while the Eastern Arc Mountains have been included in the larger Eastern Afromotane hotspot (Myers, 2003; Wilkinson and Nussbaum, 2006; Wilkinson et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]