DOCSLIB.ORG

Imprisonment: Where?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Imprisonment: Where? If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. IMPRISONMENT: WHERE? -- --- - --5 DEC "1 '\918 Imprisonment: where? Institutions (prisons and remand houses) to which persons* sentenced to tenns of imprisonment may be committed There are various types of t)(ison in the Netherlands, each type being intended for a particular category of piisoner, for instance young persons or aduits, prisoners serving short-term or long-term sentenQ~S, men or women. Selection for any of these institutions takes into account: - age; - length of sentence. Another important factor is whether or not the person concerned wa~ already in custody when sentenced (i.e. on remand in a rgrnand house). Age As far as age is concerned, a distinction is drawn between adults (persons aged 23 and over} and young p1'lrsons (the 18 -23 age-group; in some cases, persons under 18 Or ;:,VGii persons of23 and 24). length of sentence When distinguishing between persons serving short-term and long-term sentences, the actual du ration of the sentence is taken into account, that is to say, the sentence imposed less any period spent in custody awaiting trial or sentence (Le. in preliminary detention). The length of sentence is important since, as already * the only establishment to which women sentenced to imprisonment are committed Is the Rotterdam Women's Prison; the information given in this pamphlet, therefore, refers only to male prisoners. 1 stated, a number of institutions are intended for prisoners serving short-term sentences and a number of others for those serving long-term sentences. The borderline between short-term and long-term sentences may in principle lie between 4 and 6 months; at the moment, it is drawn - at 5 months for you ng persons; - at 6 months for adults. Are you ah'eady in preliminary detention? You may well be under preliminary detention at tl1e moment you are sentenced; ifso, your sentence will start from the commencement of your preliminary detention. The institutions to which you may be committed if you are aged 23 or over are shown in the diagram opposite (figure 1), and in figure 2 if you are under 23. 2 oNl '\ ,_0--.-6 ___ ~?\ NIEUWERSLUIS PRISON AND REMAND HOUSE REMAN'.> HOUSE (preferably the remand house where the prisone' Is being held) Figure 7. ,Penal institutions to which adults may be committed fol/owing a period spent il1 custody awaiting trial or sentence (i.e. in preliminary detention) How to 'read' the diagrams You will note that the outer band of each circle shows the duration of the sentence, i.e. the period remaining after deduction of time spent in preliminary detention; it tells you which sector applies to your sentence and hence in which institution you may serve your sentence. 3 'De Corridor' CORRECTIVE TRAINING CAMP, ZCELAr.D (N.BR) maximum staV4 months) REMAND HOUSE 'Nieuw Vossoveldt' (preferably the house of PRISON, VUGHT detention where the prisoner is (main building) alrendy being held) ZUTPHEN PIlISON FOR YOUNG NIEUWERSLUIS PRISON AND PERSONS REMAND HOUSE (Ih& lUst 2 to 3 months may be (for seIVicemen who are to spent In 'Rotonhof' opon wing return to military service after ofprj~on) seIVing their sentence) OPEN PRISONS OPEN PRISONS conditions: conditions: Ok (1) mInimum sentenc$ a (1) minimum sentenco a ~ months; months; ~'" (2) half 01 Sentence alreadv (2)half of sentence alreadv "/L " completed; completed; ''70 ~ (length ohley: liength of stay: i1Ih ~t05monthS) 3t05months) /// -YoS' . ~ ~ - Figure 2. Institutions to which young people may be sent following a period spent in custody awaiting trial or sentence (i.e. in preliminary detention) 4 If you are not in preliminary detention In certain cases. the judge may decide not to remand a defendant in custody and Jrder instead that he remains free until such time as he is called upon to report at a certain institution to serve his sentence. If he fails to report, the police will usually be ordered to arrest him. Therefore, if you have not been remanded in custody to await trial, you will, if convicted, be sent direct to the place of imprisonment without serving any period of preliminary detention. If you are 23 or over the upper half of fig. 3 shows you the institution to which you may be sent; the bottom half will show you the institution to which you may be sent if you are under 23. In other words, there are special prisons for the category of defendants left free until trial, butthose who have been remanded in custody are sent either to a remand house, to an ordinary prison (see figures 1 and 2) or to a separate wing of the Leeuwarden Remand House. Imprisonment following preliminary detention (adultsl­ see fig. 1 - Remand house (preferably the remand house where the prisoner is already in custody). Lack of accommodation, however, may sometimes necessitate committal to some other remand house. - 'De Boschpoort' Prison, Breda; - 'Nederheide' Prison Training Institution, Doetinchem; - Nieuwersluis Prison and Remand House (for servicemen who are to return to military service after serving their sentence); - Open Prisons (to qualify for one of these prisons, a prisoner must have been sentenced to 8 months or more and he must already have completed at least half of that term. Length of stay between 3 and 5 months); - 'De Fleddervoort' Semi-open Prison, Veenhuizen (the remainder of the term to be served should not be less than 2 months and not more than 3 months); - 'Esserheem' Prison, Veenhuizen; - 'Norgerhaven' Prison, Veenhuizen; - The Hague prison; - 'Noorderschans' Prison, Winschoten; - 'Schutterswei' Prison, Alkmaar. 5 Term of imprisonment following preliminary detention (young persons) - see figure 2 - Remand house (preferably the house of detention where the prisoner is already being held. Lack of accommodation may, however, necessitate Gommittal to some other remand house); - 'De Corridor' Corrective Training Camp, Zeeland (maximum stay 4 months); - the main building ofthe 'Nieuw Vosseveldt' Prison, Vught; - Nieuwersluis Prison and Remand House (for servicemen who are to return to military service after serving their sentence); - Zutphen Prison for Young Persons (prisoners may serve the last 2 to 3 months of their sentence in 'Rozenhof' open wing ofthe prison); - Open Prisons (to qualify for one of these prisons, a prisoner must have been sentenced to 8 months or more and he must have completed at least half of that term. Length of stay between 3 and 5 months). Committal of prisoners who have not been in preliminary detention (adults) - see upper half of figure 3 - Remand house (preferably the house of detention in the district in which the prisoner was convicted or in an adjacent district); - 'de Raam' Prison, Grave, North Brabant (less than 1 month); - 'Oostereiland' Prison, Hoorn (length of sentence 14 days to 2 months); - 'Ter Peel' Prison, Sevenum (length of sentence: up to 6 months); - the 'Bankenbosch' and 'Nieuw Bergveen' wings of the 'Groot Bankenbosch' Prison, Veenhuizen. NB: Any prisoners who, without any explanation fail to report to serve their sentence when ordered to do so by the Selection and Guidance Division of the Penal Selection Centre will be sent to one of the prisons named for the prisoners listed under 1. See lower half of fig. 3 for prisoners who have not been held in custody (young persons) - Remand house (preferably the house of detention inthe district in which the prisoner was convicted or in an adjacent district); ADULTS 'Oosterelland' PRISON, HOORN 14daysto2 mon!hs) PRISON, GRAVE \ \ \ \ (scntences exceeding 6 months \ after Initial reception ! / \ .tVught) REMAND HOUSE / \ main building of C. ' I \ the 'N,euw ;,0 \ I 'Do Loy' and ~osseVOldt' Prison for 1:> > / '00 Heggo' Young Persons at Vught ,;> . ! wings of tho (longth of sentonce 1 to 5 n __ -- j'NioUW Vosseveldt' months inclusive). ,9;:- \ '70 '. /PRISON FOR YOUNG ' ~v '~~.- / I'ERSONSATVUGHT~ 0 • T / (length of sentonce ~\{) / 14 days to 1 month) "- ~~ / :-{;;> "'; .... <", t>- --, /''--_-, ,\flr~- ---'---'-~---.. _/ YOUNG PERSONS Figflfl' 3. Institutions to wllicll adults (see upper Ilalf) and young persons (see lower Ilalf! may lJe sent if tlley Ilave not been in preliminary detention 7 - 'De Ley' and 'De Hegge' wings of the 'Nieuw Vosseveldt' Prison for Young Persons at Vught (length of sentence 14 days to 1 month); - the main building of the 'Nieuw Vosseveldt' Prison for Young Persons at Vught (length of sentence 1 to 5 months inclusive). Prisoners may be transferred from tht' Prison for Young Persons at Vught to 'De Corridor' Corrective Training Camp (iength of sentence 1 to 5 months inclusive); - Zutphen Prison for Young Persons (sentences exceeding 5 months after initial reception at Vught). NB: Any prisoners who, without any explanation fail to report to serve their sentence when ordered to do so by the Selection and Guidance Division of the Penal Selection Centre will be sent to one of the prisons named for the prisoners listed in 2. SHORT TERMS OF IMPRISONMENT WHICH MAY BE SERVED PIECEMEAL In a number of houses of detention, short terms of imprisonment may be served piecemeal, for ir.stance at weekends (hence the original name: 'weekend sentence'). The remand houses at which this is possible are: Leeuwarden, Almelo, Arnhem, Utrecht, Alkmaar, Haarlem, The Hague, Den Bosch, Breda, Zutphen, Rotterdam. 8 Stafbureou Voorlichting Ministariavon Justitia In somonworking met hot CJt1traol WorVlnUS on Opioldings ill, .Ituut von hat Gevangeniswezon 's·Grovenhage, oktober 1976 Vormgeving: StaatsdrukkeriJ (Rob Leunnkj -, -- OW' ric -.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brabant Midden-West-Noord
    WA/Vi Brabant Midden-West-Noord Gemeenschappelijke regeling Regionale Ambulancevoorziening Brabant Midden-West-Noord De raden en de colleges van de gemeenten Aalburg, Alphen-Chaam, Baarle-Nassau, Bergen op Zoom, Bernheze, Boekei, Boxmeer, Boxtel, Breda, Cuijk, Dongen, Drimmelen, Etten-Leur, Geertruidenberg, Gilze en Rijen, Goirle, Grave, Haaren, Halderberge, 's-Hertogenbosch, Heusden, Hilvarenbeek, Landerd, Loon op Zand, Mill en Sint Hubert, Moerdijk, Oisterwijk, Oosterhout, Oss, Roosendaal, Rucphen, Schijndel, Sint Anthonis, Sint-Michielsgestel, Sint-Oedenrode, Steenbergen, Tilburg, Uden, Veghel, Vught, Waalwijk, Werkendam, Woensdrecht, Woudrichem en Zundert; overwegende dat het voor een goede ambulancezorg van belang is samen te werken; dat deze samenwerking zich richt op ambulancezorg waarbij de patiënt centraal staat; dat de ambulancezorg een onderdeel is van de keten van gezondheidszorg in Nederland; dat de ambulancezorg daarnaast een belangrijke pijler is onder de geneeskundige hulpverlening bij ongevallen en rampen en het wenselijk is om het werkgebied te laten samenvallen met dat van de veiligheidsregio's Midden- en West-Brabant en Brabant-Noord; dat zij daarvoor een gemeenschappelijke regeling willen aangaan op de schaal van Midden- en West-Brabant en Brabant-Noord en daarbij een openbaar lichaam willen instellen; gelet op: de Wet gemeenschappelijke regelingen, de Gemeentewet, de Tijdelijke wet ambulancezorg, de Kwaliteitswet zorginstellingen, de Wet toelating zorginstellingen, de Wet marktordening gezondheidszorg en de Wet veiligheidsregio's; besluiten de gemeenschappelijke regeling Regionale Ambulancevoorziening Brabant Midden-West- Noord te wijzigen en conform de volgende tekst vast te stellen. Gemeenschappelijke regeling RAV Brabant Midden-West-Noord versie 4 Hoofdstuk 1 Begripsbepalingen Artikel 1 Begrippen 1. Deze gemeenschappelijke regeling verstaat onder: a. wet: Wet gemeenschappelijke regelingen; b.
    [Show full text]
  • VERSPREIDINGSGEBIED HUIS AAN HUISKRANTEN Regio Noord
    Schiermonnikoog Ameland Eemsmond Terschelling De Marne Dongeradeel Loppersum Appingedam Ferwerderadeel Winsum Delfzijl Bedum Kollummerland C.A. Ten Boer Het Bildt Dantumadeel Zuidhorn Leeuwarderadeel Slochteren Groningen Achtkarspelen Grootegast Vlieland Oldambt Menaldumadeel Tytsjerksteradeel Franekeradeel Leek Menterwolde Harlingen Hoogezand-Sappemeer Haren Leeuwaden Marum Littenseradiel Smallingerland Bellingwedde Tynaarlo Veendam Pekela Texel Noordenveld Opsterland Aa en Hunze Assen Stadskanaal Súdwest-Fryslan Vlagtwedde Ooststellingwerf Heerenveen De Friese Meren Den Helder Borger-Odoorn Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Westerveld Hollands Kroon Schagen Steenwijkerland Emmen Coevorden Meppel De Wolden Hoogeveen Medemblik Opmeer Enk- Stede huizen Noordoostpolder Heerhugo- Broec Langedijk waard Urk Bergen Drechterland Hoorn Staphorst Koggenland Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Heiloo Alkmaar Kampen Castricum Beemster Ommen Zeevang Dalfsen Uitgeest Dronten Zwolle Heemskerk Edam Wormerland Purmerend Lelystad Beverwijk Hattem Twenterand Oldebroek Zaanstad Oost- Lands- zaan meer Tubbergen Velsen Waterland Elburg Heerde Raalte Bloemen- Hellendoorn daal Haarlemmer- Dinkelland liede C.A. Olst-Wijhe Almelo Haarlem Amsterdam Almere Nunspeet Wierden Zand- Zeewolde Harderwijk Epe voort Heem- Borne stede Diemen Oldenzaal Muiden Losser Rijssen-Holten Haarlemmermeer Weesp Hille- Ouder- Naarden Huizen Ermelo Hengelo gom Amstel Deventer Amstel- Blari- veen Bussum Noord- Abcoude cum Putten wijker- Lisse Aalsmeer Laren Eemnes Hof van Twente Enschede hout Bunschoten
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for More Incarceration
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Policy and Communications Office of Policy Development The Case for More Incarceration 1992 &7 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Policy and Communications Office of Policy Development The Case for More Incarceration 1992, NCJ-J39583 139583 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the Ph~rson or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in t IS do.c~ment ~~e those of (he authors and do not necessarily rep'esent the official position or pOlicies of the National Institute of Justice. Permtisdsion to reproduce this II f) I8llM material has been gran~d t:1y • . • .l?UbllC Danain/Off. of Poliey Communications/Off. of POlley Develop. to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Ffutrthher repr?ductlon outside of the NCJRS system requires permission o e ........ owner. NCJRS ~AN 5 1993 ACQUISITIONS (@ffitt nf tltt Attnrntl1 <&tntral liIus1yingtnn, i.QT. 20530 October 28, 1992 In July, I released a report entitled Combating Violent Crime: 24 Recommendations to strengthen Criminal Justice, set­ ting forth a comprehensive strategy for making state criminal justice systems more effective in achieving their central purpose -- the protection of our citizens. As I stated then, there is no better way to reduce crime than to identify, target, and incapa­ citate those hardened criminals who commit staggering numbers of violent crimes whenever they are on the streets. Of course, we cannot incapacitate these criminals unless we build sufficient prison and jail space to house them.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisons in Yemen
    [PEACEW RKS [ PRISONS IN YEMEN Fiona Mangan with Erica Gaston ABOUT THE REPORT This report examines the prison system in Yemen from a systems perspective. Part of a three-year United States Institute of Peace (USIP) rule of law project on the post-Arab Spring transition period in Yemen, the study was supported by the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Bureau of the U.S. State Department. With permission from the Yemeni Ministry of Interior and the Yemeni Prison Authority, the research team—authors Fiona Mangan and Erica Gaston for USIP, Aiman al-Eryani and Taha Yaseen of the Yemen Polling Center, and consultant Lamis Alhamedy—visited thirty-seven deten- tion facilities in six governorates to assess organizational function, infrastructure, prisoner well-being, and security. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Fiona Mangan is a senior program officer with the USIP Governance Law and Society Center. Her work focuses on prison reform, organized crime, justice, and security issues. She holds degrees from Columbia University, King’s College London, and University College Dublin. Erica Gaston is a human rights lawyer with seven years of experience in programming and research in Afghanistan on human rights and justice promotion. Her publications include books on the legal, ethical, and practical dilemmas emerging in modern conflict and crisis zones; studies mapping justice systems and outcomes in Afghanistan and Yemen; and thematic research and opinion pieces on rule of law issues in transitioning countries. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Harvard Law School. Cover photo: Covered Yard Area, Hodeida Central. Photo by Fiona Mangan. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors alone.
    [Show full text]
  • From Slavery to Mass Incarceration
    loïc wacquant FROM SLAVERY TO MASS INCARCERATION Rethinking the ‘race question’ in the US ot one but several ‘peculiar institutions’ have success- ively operated to define, confine, and control African- NAmericans in the history of the United States. The first is chattel slavery as the pivot of the plantation economy and inceptive matrix of racial division from the colonial era to the Civil War. The second is the Jim Crow system of legally enforced discrimination and segregation from cradle to grave that anchored the predominantly agrarian society of the South from the close of Reconstruction to the Civil Rights revolution which toppled it a full century after abolition. America’s third special device for containing the descendants of slaves in the Northern industrial metropolis is the ghetto, corresponding to the conjoint urbanization and proletarianization of African-Americans from the Great Migration of 1914–30 to the 1960s, when it was ren- dered partially obsolete by the concurrent transformation of economy and state and by the mounting protest of blacks against continued caste exclusion, climaxing with the explosive urban riots chronicled in the Kerner Commission Report.1 The fourth, I contend here, is the novel institutional complex formed by the remnants of the dark ghetto and the carceral apparatus with which it has become joined by a linked relationship of structural symbiosis and functional surrogacy. This suggests that slavery and mass imprisonment are genealogically linked and that one cannot understand the latter—its new left review 13 jan feb 2002 41 timing, composition, and smooth onset as well as the quiet ignorance or acceptance of its deleterious effects on those it affects—without return- ing to the former as historic starting point and functional analogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Indeling Van Nederland in 40 COROP-Gebieden Gemeentelijke Indeling Van Nederland Op 1 Januari 2019
    Indeling van Nederland in 40 COROP-gebieden Gemeentelijke indeling van Nederland op 1 januari 2019 Legenda COROP-grens Het Hogeland Schiermonnikoog Gemeentegrens Ameland Woonkern Terschelling Het Hogeland 02 Noardeast-Fryslân Loppersum Appingedam Delfzijl Dantumadiel 03 Achtkarspelen Vlieland Waadhoeke 04 Westerkwartier GRONINGEN Midden-Groningen Oldambt Tytsjerksteradiel Harlingen LEEUWARDEN Smallingerland Veendam Westerwolde Noordenveld Tynaarlo Pekela Texel Opsterland Súdwest-Fryslân 01 06 Assen Aa en Hunze Stadskanaal Ooststellingwerf 05 07 Heerenveen Den Helder Borger-Odoorn De Fryske Marren Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Hollands Westerveld Kroon Schagen 08 18 Steenwijkerland EMMEN 09 Coevorden Hoogeveen Medemblik Enkhuizen Opmeer Noordoostpolder Langedijk Stede Broec Meppel Heerhugowaard Bergen Drechterland Urk De Wolden Hoorn Koggenland 19 Staphorst Heiloo ALKMAAR Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Castricum Beemster Kampen 10 Edam- Volendam Uitgeest 40 ZWOLLE Ommen Heemskerk Dalfsen Wormerland Purmerend Dronten Beverwijk Lelystad 22 Hattem ZAANSTAD Twenterand 20 Oostzaan Waterland Oldebroek Velsen Landsmeer Tubbergen Bloemendaal Elburg Heerde Dinkelland Raalte 21 HAARLEM AMSTERDAM Zandvoort ALMERE Hellendoorn Almelo Heemstede Zeewolde Wierden 23 Diemen Harderwijk Nunspeet Olst- Wijhe 11 Losser Epe Borne HAARLEMMERMEER Gooise Oldenzaal Weesp Hillegom Meren Rijssen-Holten Ouder- Amstel Huizen Ermelo Amstelveen Blaricum Noordwijk Deventer 12 Hengelo Lisse Aalsmeer 24 Eemnes Laren Putten 25 Uithoorn Wijdemeren Bunschoten Hof van Voorst Teylingen
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: Pre-Trial Detention
    Detention Monitoring Tool Factsheet Pre-trial detention Addressing risk factors to prevent torture and ill-treatment ‘Long periods of pre-trial custody contribute to overcrowding in prisons, exacerbating the existing problems as regards conditions and relations between the detainees and staff; they also add to the burden on the courts. From the standpoint of preventing ill-treatment, this raises serious concerns for a system already showing signs of stress.’ (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture)1 1. Definition and context 2. What are the main standards? Remand prisoners are detained during criminal Because of its severe and often irreversible negative investigations and pending trial. Pre-trial detention is effects, international law requires that pre-trial not a sanction, but a measure to safeguard a criminal detention should be the exception rather than the procedure. rule. At any one time, an estimated 3.2 million people are Pre-trial detention is only legitimate where there is a behind bars awaiting trial, accounting for 30 per cent reasonable suspicion of the person having committed of the total prison population worldwide. They are the offence, and where detention is necessary and legally presumed innocent until proven guilty but may proportionate to prevent them from absconding, be held in conditions that are worse than those for committing another offence, or interfering with the convicted prisoners and sometimes for years on end. course of justice during pending procedures. This means that pre-trial detention is not legitimate where Pre-trial detention undermines the chance of a fair these objectives can be achieved through other, less trial and the presumption of innocence.
    [Show full text]
  • Nieuwe Dienstregeling Meer Treinen
    Dienstregeling 2018 Belangrijkste wijzigingen Leeuwarden Amsterdam – Schagen Den Helder – Schagen In de vroege ochtendspits minder Intercity’s In de ochtendspits starten er meer treinen Leeuwarden – Meppel richting Schagen en in de late avondspits in Den Helder in plaats van Schagen, in de Van één naar twee sprinters per uur. minder Intercity’s van Schagen naar avondspits rijden meer treinen door van De Intercity rijdt 2x per uur en stopt Amsterdam (tegenspitsrichting). Schagen naar Den Helder. alleen in Leeuwarden, Heerenveen, De Sprinter Uitgeest-Rhenen staat 4 minuten Steenwijk en Meppel. stil in Wormerveer. Reizigers die verder reizen dan Wormerveer hebben hierdoor een langere Den Helder reistijd. Deze Sprinter sluit op Amsterdam Centraal niet meer aan op de Intercity naar Hoorn Hoorn Almere Centrum. In spitsuren kortere overstap In daluren langere overstap vanuit Enkhuizen op de Sprinters vanuit Enkhuizen op de Sprinters Schagen richting Alkmaar en Purmerend richting Alkmaar en Purmerend en v.v. en v.v. Schagen – Alkmaar – Enkhuizen Meppel Amsterdam Centraal Hoorn Intercity’s krijgen een interval van Almelo – Enschede 10 en 20 minuten in plaats van elk kwartier. Alkmaar De Sprinter Apeldoorn-Almelo-Enschede Kampen moet tijdens spitsuren wegens drukte op Alkmaar – Haarlem het spoor één keer per uur lang wachten Extra Intercity in ochtend en middagspits. Enkhuizen – Amsterdam Zwolle op station Almelo voordat deze kan Extra Intercity in ochtend en middagspits. doorrijden. De Intercity van Schiphol Enkhuizen – Heerlen Airport naar Enschede is om dezelfde Amsterdam Centraal De Intercity Enkhuizen– Amsterdam Centraal rijdt door naar Heerlen. reden in de spits 2 minuten langer Kortere reistijd door herstel ’s Avonds en in vroege ochtend rijdt de Intercity Enkhuizen-Amsterdam Amsterdam Zwolle-Kampen en onderweg tussen Almelo en Enschede.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Herindelingsadvies Gemeenten Haaren, Oisterwijk, Vught, Boxtel En
    HERINDELINGSADVIES GEMEENTEN HAAREN OISTERWIJK VUGHT BOXTEL TILBURG EEN DUURZAAM GROEN HART IN BRABANT HERINDELINGSADVIES GEMEENTEN HAAREN OISTERWIJK VUGHT BOXTEL TILBURG EEN DUURZAAM GROEN HART IN BRABANT JUNI 2019 INHOUDSOPGAVE Samenvatting 6 6. GRENSCORRECTIE DORP BIEZENMORTEL MET TILBURG 50 Doel en totstandkoming herindelingsadvies 9 6.1. Kenmerken gemeenten 51 6.1.1. Kerncijfers dorp Biezenmortel-gemeente Haaren en gemeente Tilburg 51 1. AANLEIDING EN VOORGESCHIEDENIS HERINDELINGSADVIES 12 6.1.2. Kenmerken dorp Biezenmortel 51 6.1.3. Kenmerken gemeente Tilburg 52 2. UITGANGSPUNTEN VOOR DE HERINDELING 20 6.1.4. Financiële aspecten 52 6.1.5. Bestaande samenwerkingsrelaties 54 2.1. Drie uitgangspunten voor de herindeling 21 2.2. Grenzen 21 6.2. Visie op de gewijzigde gemeente Tilburg 54 2.3. Herindelingsdatum 23 6.2.1. Visie gemeente Tilburg 54 2.4. Lichte samenvoeging en grenscorrectie 23 6.2.2. Personeel en organisatie 56 6.2.3. Grenscorrectie en regionale samenwerking 56 3. SAMENVOEGING DORP HAAREN BIJ OISTERWIJK 26 7. TOETSING AAN CRITERIA GEMEENTELIJKE HERINDELING 58 3.1. Kenmerken gemeenten 27 3.1.1. Kerncijfers dorp Haaren-gemeente Haaren en gemeente Oisterwijk 27 7.1. Toets herindelingsvoorstel aan criteria 59 3.1.2. Kenmerken dorp Haaren 27 7.2. Toetsing aan criteria ‘Beleidskader gemeentelijke herindeling 2018’ 60 3.1.3. Kenmerken gemeente Oisterwijk 28 7.2.1. Draagvlak 60 3.1.4. Financiële aspecten 29 7.2.2. Interne samenhang en nabijheid van bestuur 66 3.1.5. Bestaande samenwerkingsrelaties 30 7.2.3. Bestuurskracht 68 7.2.4. Regionale samenhang 68 3.2. Visie op de gewijzigde gemeente Oisterwijk 31 7.2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • World War Ii Internment Camp Survivors
    WORLD WAR II INTERNMENT CAMP SURVIVORS: THE STORIES AND LIFE EXPERIENCES OF JAPANESE AMERICAN WOMEN Precious Vida Yamaguchi A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Committee: Radhika Gajjala, Ph.D., Advisor Sherlon Pack-Brown, Ph.D. Graduate Faculty Representative Lynda D. Dixon, Ph.D. Lousia Ha, Ph.D. Ellen Gorsevski, Ph.D. © 2010 Precious Vida Yamaguchi All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Radhika Gajjala, Advisor On February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066 required all people of Japanese ancestry in America (one-eighth of Japanese blood or more), living on the west coast to be relocated into internment camps. Over 120,000 people were forced to leave their homes, businesses, and all their belongings except for one suitcase and were placed in barbed-wire internment camps patrolled by armed police. This study looks at narratives, stories, and experiences of Japanese American women who experienced the World War II internment camps through an anti-colonial theoretical framework and ethnographic methods. The use of ethnographic methods and interviews with the generation of Japanese American women who experienced part of their lives in the United State World War II internment camps explores how it affected their lives during and after World War II. The researcher of this study hopes to learn how Japanese American women reflect upon and describe their lives before, during, and after the internment camps, document the narratives of the Japanese American women who were imprisoned in the internment camps, and research how their experiences have been told to their children and grandchildren.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Trial Detention Addressing Risk Factors to Prevent Torture and Ill-Treatment
    Detention Monitoring Tool Second edition FACTSHEET Pre-trial detention Addressing risk factors to prevent torture and ill-treatment ‘Long periods of pre-trial custody contribute to overcrowding in prisons, exacerbating the existing problems as regards conditions and relations between the detainees and staff; they also add to the burden on the courts. From the standpoint of preventing ill-treatment, this raises serious concerns for a system already showing signs of stress.’ (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture)1 1. Definition and context 2. What are the main standards? Remand prisoners are detained during criminal Because of its severe and often irreversible negative investigations and pending trial. Pre-trial detention is effects, international law requires that pre-trial detention not a sanction, but a measure to safeguard a criminal should be the exception rather than the rule. procedure. Pre-trial detention is only legitimate where there is a At any one time, an estimated 3.2 million people are reasonable suspicion of the person having committed behind bars awaiting trial, accounting for 30 per cent of the offence, and where detention is necessary and the total prison population worldwide. In some countries, proportionate to prevent them from absconding, pre-trial detainees reportedly constitute the majority of committing another offence, or interfering with the course the prison population, and in some settings even over of justice during pending procedures. This means that 90 per cent of detainees.2 They are legally presumed pre-trial detention is not legitimate where these objectives innocent until proven guilty but may be held in conditions can be achieved through other, less intrusive measures.
    [Show full text]