Imprisonment: Where?
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Brabant Midden-West-Noord
WA/Vi Brabant Midden-West-Noord Gemeenschappelijke regeling Regionale Ambulancevoorziening Brabant Midden-West-Noord De raden en de colleges van de gemeenten Aalburg, Alphen-Chaam, Baarle-Nassau, Bergen op Zoom, Bernheze, Boekei, Boxmeer, Boxtel, Breda, Cuijk, Dongen, Drimmelen, Etten-Leur, Geertruidenberg, Gilze en Rijen, Goirle, Grave, Haaren, Halderberge, 's-Hertogenbosch, Heusden, Hilvarenbeek, Landerd, Loon op Zand, Mill en Sint Hubert, Moerdijk, Oisterwijk, Oosterhout, Oss, Roosendaal, Rucphen, Schijndel, Sint Anthonis, Sint-Michielsgestel, Sint-Oedenrode, Steenbergen, Tilburg, Uden, Veghel, Vught, Waalwijk, Werkendam, Woensdrecht, Woudrichem en Zundert; overwegende dat het voor een goede ambulancezorg van belang is samen te werken; dat deze samenwerking zich richt op ambulancezorg waarbij de patiënt centraal staat; dat de ambulancezorg een onderdeel is van de keten van gezondheidszorg in Nederland; dat de ambulancezorg daarnaast een belangrijke pijler is onder de geneeskundige hulpverlening bij ongevallen en rampen en het wenselijk is om het werkgebied te laten samenvallen met dat van de veiligheidsregio's Midden- en West-Brabant en Brabant-Noord; dat zij daarvoor een gemeenschappelijke regeling willen aangaan op de schaal van Midden- en West-Brabant en Brabant-Noord en daarbij een openbaar lichaam willen instellen; gelet op: de Wet gemeenschappelijke regelingen, de Gemeentewet, de Tijdelijke wet ambulancezorg, de Kwaliteitswet zorginstellingen, de Wet toelating zorginstellingen, de Wet marktordening gezondheidszorg en de Wet veiligheidsregio's; besluiten de gemeenschappelijke regeling Regionale Ambulancevoorziening Brabant Midden-West- Noord te wijzigen en conform de volgende tekst vast te stellen. Gemeenschappelijke regeling RAV Brabant Midden-West-Noord versie 4 Hoofdstuk 1 Begripsbepalingen Artikel 1 Begrippen 1. Deze gemeenschappelijke regeling verstaat onder: a. wet: Wet gemeenschappelijke regelingen; b. -
VERSPREIDINGSGEBIED HUIS AAN HUISKRANTEN Regio Noord
Schiermonnikoog Ameland Eemsmond Terschelling De Marne Dongeradeel Loppersum Appingedam Ferwerderadeel Winsum Delfzijl Bedum Kollummerland C.A. Ten Boer Het Bildt Dantumadeel Zuidhorn Leeuwarderadeel Slochteren Groningen Achtkarspelen Grootegast Vlieland Oldambt Menaldumadeel Tytsjerksteradeel Franekeradeel Leek Menterwolde Harlingen Hoogezand-Sappemeer Haren Leeuwaden Marum Littenseradiel Smallingerland Bellingwedde Tynaarlo Veendam Pekela Texel Noordenveld Opsterland Aa en Hunze Assen Stadskanaal Súdwest-Fryslan Vlagtwedde Ooststellingwerf Heerenveen De Friese Meren Den Helder Borger-Odoorn Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Westerveld Hollands Kroon Schagen Steenwijkerland Emmen Coevorden Meppel De Wolden Hoogeveen Medemblik Opmeer Enk- Stede huizen Noordoostpolder Heerhugo- Broec Langedijk waard Urk Bergen Drechterland Hoorn Staphorst Koggenland Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Heiloo Alkmaar Kampen Castricum Beemster Ommen Zeevang Dalfsen Uitgeest Dronten Zwolle Heemskerk Edam Wormerland Purmerend Lelystad Beverwijk Hattem Twenterand Oldebroek Zaanstad Oost- Lands- zaan meer Tubbergen Velsen Waterland Elburg Heerde Raalte Bloemen- Hellendoorn daal Haarlemmer- Dinkelland liede C.A. Olst-Wijhe Almelo Haarlem Amsterdam Almere Nunspeet Wierden Zand- Zeewolde Harderwijk Epe voort Heem- Borne stede Diemen Oldenzaal Muiden Losser Rijssen-Holten Haarlemmermeer Weesp Hille- Ouder- Naarden Huizen Ermelo Hengelo gom Amstel Deventer Amstel- Blari- veen Bussum Noord- Abcoude cum Putten wijker- Lisse Aalsmeer Laren Eemnes Hof van Twente Enschede hout Bunschoten -
Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination. -
The Case for More Incarceration
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Policy and Communications Office of Policy Development The Case for More Incarceration 1992 &7 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Policy and Communications Office of Policy Development The Case for More Incarceration 1992, NCJ-J39583 139583 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the Ph~rson or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in t IS do.c~ment ~~e those of (he authors and do not necessarily rep'esent the official position or pOlicies of the National Institute of Justice. Permtisdsion to reproduce this II f) I8llM material has been gran~d t:1y • . • .l?UbllC Danain/Off. of Poliey Communications/Off. of POlley Develop. to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Ffutrthher repr?ductlon outside of the NCJRS system requires permission o e ........ owner. NCJRS ~AN 5 1993 ACQUISITIONS (@ffitt nf tltt Attnrntl1 <&tntral liIus1yingtnn, i.QT. 20530 October 28, 1992 In July, I released a report entitled Combating Violent Crime: 24 Recommendations to strengthen Criminal Justice, set ting forth a comprehensive strategy for making state criminal justice systems more effective in achieving their central purpose -- the protection of our citizens. As I stated then, there is no better way to reduce crime than to identify, target, and incapa citate those hardened criminals who commit staggering numbers of violent crimes whenever they are on the streets. Of course, we cannot incapacitate these criminals unless we build sufficient prison and jail space to house them. -
Prisons in Yemen
[PEACEW RKS [ PRISONS IN YEMEN Fiona Mangan with Erica Gaston ABOUT THE REPORT This report examines the prison system in Yemen from a systems perspective. Part of a three-year United States Institute of Peace (USIP) rule of law project on the post-Arab Spring transition period in Yemen, the study was supported by the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Bureau of the U.S. State Department. With permission from the Yemeni Ministry of Interior and the Yemeni Prison Authority, the research team—authors Fiona Mangan and Erica Gaston for USIP, Aiman al-Eryani and Taha Yaseen of the Yemen Polling Center, and consultant Lamis Alhamedy—visited thirty-seven deten- tion facilities in six governorates to assess organizational function, infrastructure, prisoner well-being, and security. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Fiona Mangan is a senior program officer with the USIP Governance Law and Society Center. Her work focuses on prison reform, organized crime, justice, and security issues. She holds degrees from Columbia University, King’s College London, and University College Dublin. Erica Gaston is a human rights lawyer with seven years of experience in programming and research in Afghanistan on human rights and justice promotion. Her publications include books on the legal, ethical, and practical dilemmas emerging in modern conflict and crisis zones; studies mapping justice systems and outcomes in Afghanistan and Yemen; and thematic research and opinion pieces on rule of law issues in transitioning countries. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Harvard Law School. Cover photo: Covered Yard Area, Hodeida Central. Photo by Fiona Mangan. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors alone. -
From Slavery to Mass Incarceration
loïc wacquant FROM SLAVERY TO MASS INCARCERATION Rethinking the ‘race question’ in the US ot one but several ‘peculiar institutions’ have success- ively operated to define, confine, and control African- NAmericans in the history of the United States. The first is chattel slavery as the pivot of the plantation economy and inceptive matrix of racial division from the colonial era to the Civil War. The second is the Jim Crow system of legally enforced discrimination and segregation from cradle to grave that anchored the predominantly agrarian society of the South from the close of Reconstruction to the Civil Rights revolution which toppled it a full century after abolition. America’s third special device for containing the descendants of slaves in the Northern industrial metropolis is the ghetto, corresponding to the conjoint urbanization and proletarianization of African-Americans from the Great Migration of 1914–30 to the 1960s, when it was ren- dered partially obsolete by the concurrent transformation of economy and state and by the mounting protest of blacks against continued caste exclusion, climaxing with the explosive urban riots chronicled in the Kerner Commission Report.1 The fourth, I contend here, is the novel institutional complex formed by the remnants of the dark ghetto and the carceral apparatus with which it has become joined by a linked relationship of structural symbiosis and functional surrogacy. This suggests that slavery and mass imprisonment are genealogically linked and that one cannot understand the latter—its new left review 13 jan feb 2002 41 timing, composition, and smooth onset as well as the quiet ignorance or acceptance of its deleterious effects on those it affects—without return- ing to the former as historic starting point and functional analogue. -
Indeling Van Nederland in 40 COROP-Gebieden Gemeentelijke Indeling Van Nederland Op 1 Januari 2019
Indeling van Nederland in 40 COROP-gebieden Gemeentelijke indeling van Nederland op 1 januari 2019 Legenda COROP-grens Het Hogeland Schiermonnikoog Gemeentegrens Ameland Woonkern Terschelling Het Hogeland 02 Noardeast-Fryslân Loppersum Appingedam Delfzijl Dantumadiel 03 Achtkarspelen Vlieland Waadhoeke 04 Westerkwartier GRONINGEN Midden-Groningen Oldambt Tytsjerksteradiel Harlingen LEEUWARDEN Smallingerland Veendam Westerwolde Noordenveld Tynaarlo Pekela Texel Opsterland Súdwest-Fryslân 01 06 Assen Aa en Hunze Stadskanaal Ooststellingwerf 05 07 Heerenveen Den Helder Borger-Odoorn De Fryske Marren Weststellingwerf Midden-Drenthe Hollands Westerveld Kroon Schagen 08 18 Steenwijkerland EMMEN 09 Coevorden Hoogeveen Medemblik Enkhuizen Opmeer Noordoostpolder Langedijk Stede Broec Meppel Heerhugowaard Bergen Drechterland Urk De Wolden Hoorn Koggenland 19 Staphorst Heiloo ALKMAAR Zwartewaterland Hardenberg Castricum Beemster Kampen 10 Edam- Volendam Uitgeest 40 ZWOLLE Ommen Heemskerk Dalfsen Wormerland Purmerend Dronten Beverwijk Lelystad 22 Hattem ZAANSTAD Twenterand 20 Oostzaan Waterland Oldebroek Velsen Landsmeer Tubbergen Bloemendaal Elburg Heerde Dinkelland Raalte 21 HAARLEM AMSTERDAM Zandvoort ALMERE Hellendoorn Almelo Heemstede Zeewolde Wierden 23 Diemen Harderwijk Nunspeet Olst- Wijhe 11 Losser Epe Borne HAARLEMMERMEER Gooise Oldenzaal Weesp Hillegom Meren Rijssen-Holten Ouder- Amstel Huizen Ermelo Amstelveen Blaricum Noordwijk Deventer 12 Hengelo Lisse Aalsmeer 24 Eemnes Laren Putten 25 Uithoorn Wijdemeren Bunschoten Hof van Voorst Teylingen -
Factsheet: Pre-Trial Detention
Detention Monitoring Tool Factsheet Pre-trial detention Addressing risk factors to prevent torture and ill-treatment ‘Long periods of pre-trial custody contribute to overcrowding in prisons, exacerbating the existing problems as regards conditions and relations between the detainees and staff; they also add to the burden on the courts. From the standpoint of preventing ill-treatment, this raises serious concerns for a system already showing signs of stress.’ (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture)1 1. Definition and context 2. What are the main standards? Remand prisoners are detained during criminal Because of its severe and often irreversible negative investigations and pending trial. Pre-trial detention is effects, international law requires that pre-trial not a sanction, but a measure to safeguard a criminal detention should be the exception rather than the procedure. rule. At any one time, an estimated 3.2 million people are Pre-trial detention is only legitimate where there is a behind bars awaiting trial, accounting for 30 per cent reasonable suspicion of the person having committed of the total prison population worldwide. They are the offence, and where detention is necessary and legally presumed innocent until proven guilty but may proportionate to prevent them from absconding, be held in conditions that are worse than those for committing another offence, or interfering with the convicted prisoners and sometimes for years on end. course of justice during pending procedures. This means that pre-trial detention is not legitimate where Pre-trial detention undermines the chance of a fair these objectives can be achieved through other, less trial and the presumption of innocence. -
Nieuwe Dienstregeling Meer Treinen
Dienstregeling 2018 Belangrijkste wijzigingen Leeuwarden Amsterdam – Schagen Den Helder – Schagen In de vroege ochtendspits minder Intercity’s In de ochtendspits starten er meer treinen Leeuwarden – Meppel richting Schagen en in de late avondspits in Den Helder in plaats van Schagen, in de Van één naar twee sprinters per uur. minder Intercity’s van Schagen naar avondspits rijden meer treinen door van De Intercity rijdt 2x per uur en stopt Amsterdam (tegenspitsrichting). Schagen naar Den Helder. alleen in Leeuwarden, Heerenveen, De Sprinter Uitgeest-Rhenen staat 4 minuten Steenwijk en Meppel. stil in Wormerveer. Reizigers die verder reizen dan Wormerveer hebben hierdoor een langere Den Helder reistijd. Deze Sprinter sluit op Amsterdam Centraal niet meer aan op de Intercity naar Hoorn Hoorn Almere Centrum. In spitsuren kortere overstap In daluren langere overstap vanuit Enkhuizen op de Sprinters vanuit Enkhuizen op de Sprinters Schagen richting Alkmaar en Purmerend richting Alkmaar en Purmerend en v.v. en v.v. Schagen – Alkmaar – Enkhuizen Meppel Amsterdam Centraal Hoorn Intercity’s krijgen een interval van Almelo – Enschede 10 en 20 minuten in plaats van elk kwartier. Alkmaar De Sprinter Apeldoorn-Almelo-Enschede Kampen moet tijdens spitsuren wegens drukte op Alkmaar – Haarlem het spoor één keer per uur lang wachten Extra Intercity in ochtend en middagspits. Enkhuizen – Amsterdam Zwolle op station Almelo voordat deze kan Extra Intercity in ochtend en middagspits. doorrijden. De Intercity van Schiphol Enkhuizen – Heerlen Airport naar Enschede is om dezelfde Amsterdam Centraal De Intercity Enkhuizen– Amsterdam Centraal rijdt door naar Heerlen. reden in de spits 2 minuten langer Kortere reistijd door herstel ’s Avonds en in vroege ochtend rijdt de Intercity Enkhuizen-Amsterdam Amsterdam Zwolle-Kampen en onderweg tussen Almelo en Enschede. -
'Herindelingsadvies Gemeenten Haaren, Oisterwijk, Vught, Boxtel En
HERINDELINGSADVIES GEMEENTEN HAAREN OISTERWIJK VUGHT BOXTEL TILBURG EEN DUURZAAM GROEN HART IN BRABANT HERINDELINGSADVIES GEMEENTEN HAAREN OISTERWIJK VUGHT BOXTEL TILBURG EEN DUURZAAM GROEN HART IN BRABANT JUNI 2019 INHOUDSOPGAVE Samenvatting 6 6. GRENSCORRECTIE DORP BIEZENMORTEL MET TILBURG 50 Doel en totstandkoming herindelingsadvies 9 6.1. Kenmerken gemeenten 51 6.1.1. Kerncijfers dorp Biezenmortel-gemeente Haaren en gemeente Tilburg 51 1. AANLEIDING EN VOORGESCHIEDENIS HERINDELINGSADVIES 12 6.1.2. Kenmerken dorp Biezenmortel 51 6.1.3. Kenmerken gemeente Tilburg 52 2. UITGANGSPUNTEN VOOR DE HERINDELING 20 6.1.4. Financiële aspecten 52 6.1.5. Bestaande samenwerkingsrelaties 54 2.1. Drie uitgangspunten voor de herindeling 21 2.2. Grenzen 21 6.2. Visie op de gewijzigde gemeente Tilburg 54 2.3. Herindelingsdatum 23 6.2.1. Visie gemeente Tilburg 54 2.4. Lichte samenvoeging en grenscorrectie 23 6.2.2. Personeel en organisatie 56 6.2.3. Grenscorrectie en regionale samenwerking 56 3. SAMENVOEGING DORP HAAREN BIJ OISTERWIJK 26 7. TOETSING AAN CRITERIA GEMEENTELIJKE HERINDELING 58 3.1. Kenmerken gemeenten 27 3.1.1. Kerncijfers dorp Haaren-gemeente Haaren en gemeente Oisterwijk 27 7.1. Toets herindelingsvoorstel aan criteria 59 3.1.2. Kenmerken dorp Haaren 27 7.2. Toetsing aan criteria ‘Beleidskader gemeentelijke herindeling 2018’ 60 3.1.3. Kenmerken gemeente Oisterwijk 28 7.2.1. Draagvlak 60 3.1.4. Financiële aspecten 29 7.2.2. Interne samenhang en nabijheid van bestuur 66 3.1.5. Bestaande samenwerkingsrelaties 30 7.2.3. Bestuurskracht 68 7.2.4. Regionale samenhang 68 3.2. Visie op de gewijzigde gemeente Oisterwijk 31 7.2.5. -
World War Ii Internment Camp Survivors
WORLD WAR II INTERNMENT CAMP SURVIVORS: THE STORIES AND LIFE EXPERIENCES OF JAPANESE AMERICAN WOMEN Precious Vida Yamaguchi A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Committee: Radhika Gajjala, Ph.D., Advisor Sherlon Pack-Brown, Ph.D. Graduate Faculty Representative Lynda D. Dixon, Ph.D. Lousia Ha, Ph.D. Ellen Gorsevski, Ph.D. © 2010 Precious Vida Yamaguchi All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Radhika Gajjala, Advisor On February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066 required all people of Japanese ancestry in America (one-eighth of Japanese blood or more), living on the west coast to be relocated into internment camps. Over 120,000 people were forced to leave their homes, businesses, and all their belongings except for one suitcase and were placed in barbed-wire internment camps patrolled by armed police. This study looks at narratives, stories, and experiences of Japanese American women who experienced the World War II internment camps through an anti-colonial theoretical framework and ethnographic methods. The use of ethnographic methods and interviews with the generation of Japanese American women who experienced part of their lives in the United State World War II internment camps explores how it affected their lives during and after World War II. The researcher of this study hopes to learn how Japanese American women reflect upon and describe their lives before, during, and after the internment camps, document the narratives of the Japanese American women who were imprisoned in the internment camps, and research how their experiences have been told to their children and grandchildren. -
Pre-Trial Detention Addressing Risk Factors to Prevent Torture and Ill-Treatment
Detention Monitoring Tool Second edition FACTSHEET Pre-trial detention Addressing risk factors to prevent torture and ill-treatment ‘Long periods of pre-trial custody contribute to overcrowding in prisons, exacerbating the existing problems as regards conditions and relations between the detainees and staff; they also add to the burden on the courts. From the standpoint of preventing ill-treatment, this raises serious concerns for a system already showing signs of stress.’ (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture)1 1. Definition and context 2. What are the main standards? Remand prisoners are detained during criminal Because of its severe and often irreversible negative investigations and pending trial. Pre-trial detention is effects, international law requires that pre-trial detention not a sanction, but a measure to safeguard a criminal should be the exception rather than the rule. procedure. Pre-trial detention is only legitimate where there is a At any one time, an estimated 3.2 million people are reasonable suspicion of the person having committed behind bars awaiting trial, accounting for 30 per cent of the offence, and where detention is necessary and the total prison population worldwide. In some countries, proportionate to prevent them from absconding, pre-trial detainees reportedly constitute the majority of committing another offence, or interfering with the course the prison population, and in some settings even over of justice during pending procedures. This means that 90 per cent of detainees.2 They are legally presumed pre-trial detention is not legitimate where these objectives innocent until proven guilty but may be held in conditions can be achieved through other, less intrusive measures.