DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Agriculture and Ecosystem Services: a Typology and Toolkit for Planners

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Agriculture and Ecosystem Services: a Typology and Toolkit for Planners View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses Dissertations and Theses November 2015 Urban Agriculture and Ecosystem Services: A Typology and Toolkit for Planners Kathleen Doherty University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2 Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Food Security Commons, Sustainability Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Doherty, Kathleen, "Urban Agriculture and Ecosystem Services: A Typology and Toolkit for Planners" (2015). Masters Theses. 269. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2/269 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. URBAN AGRICULTURE AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: A TYPOLOGY AND TOOLKIT FOR PLANNERS A Thesis Presented by KATHLEEN E. DOHERTY Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF REGIONAL PLANNING September 2015 Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning URBAN AGRICULTURE AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: A TYPOLOGY AND TOOLKIT FOR PLANNERS A Thesis Presented by KATHLEEN E. DOHERTY Approved as to style and content by: _________________________________ Mark Hamin, Chair _________________________________ Carey Clouse, Member _________________________________ Jack Ahern, Member ______________________________ Patricia McGirr, Department Head Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members for their guidance and support throughout this process. Mark, Jack, and Carey, without your direction and encouragement, I would never have been capable of research of this caliber. Thanks also to Lisa DePiano and Nathan Aldrich, two teachers whose guidance on this project and others has been invaluable. The permaculture knowledge they passed on sparked my interest in food system planning and continues to impart a more holistic approach to my work and my worldview. Finally, I would like to thank two practitioners of urban agriculture who spoke to me about this project. Mara Gittleman of Farming Concrete and Frank Mangan of UMass Extension provided me guidance and inspiration. The work of everyone involved with the precedent studies I researched has inspired and encouraged me to continue working to build a more sustainable food system for future generations. iii ABSTRACT URBAN AGRICULTURE AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: A TYPOLOGY AND TOOLKIT FOR PLANNERS SEPTEMBER 2015 KATHLEEN DOHERTY, B.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS-AMHERST M.R.P., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS-AMHERST Directed by: Professor Mark Hamin This thesis makes the connection between urban agriculture and a specific suite of ecosystem services and lays out a typology and toolkit for planners to take advantage of these ecosystem services. The services investigated here are: food production, water management, soil health, biodiversity, climate mitigation, and community development benefits. Research from a variety of fields was aggregated and synthesized to prove that urban agriculture can be beneficial for human as well as environmental health. A set of urban agriculture typologies was generated to illustrate best practices to maximize a particular set of ecosystem services. The typologies are: production farm, stormwater garden, soil-building garden, habitat garden, climate mitigation farm, cultural/educational garden, and ecosystem garden. Each typology was paired with a precedent study to demonstrate how that typology might be realized in the real world. Finally, a toolkit for planners was assembled to demonstrate some tools and techniques that planners might use to implement urban agriculture as a strategy for providing ecosystem services. Planners can utilize the toolkit to insert themselves into the urban ecosystem at multiple scales in a creative way to apply best practices and urban iv agriculture typologies in order to take advantage of the multiple benefits of urban agriculture. v CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. ix LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................x CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................1 1.2 Project description and goals .............................................................................2 1.3 Limitations and delimitations ............................................................................3 1.4 Research questions and claims...........................................................................4 1.5 Outline of chapters .............................................................................................5 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................7 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................7 2.2 Urban agriculture and organic farming: Past and future trends .........................8 2.2.1 Historic context of urban agriculture and organic farming .................8 2.2.2 Urban agriculture: Present and future ...............................................11 2.3 Ecosystem services and urban agriculture: An overview ................................12 2.3.1 What are ecosystem services? ...........................................................12 2.3.2 What ecosystem services can agriculture provide? ..........................14 2.3.3 What ecosystem services does agriculture require? ..........................15 2.3.4 What ecosystem dis-services can agriculture cause? ........................16 2.4 Food systems planning: Past and future trends ................................................17 2.4.1 Historic context of food system planning .........................................17 2.4.2 The role of the planner in building the modern food system ............18 2.5 Conclusion .......................................................................................................19 3. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................20 vi 4. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF URBAN AGRICULTURE .........................................22 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................22 4.2 Food production ...............................................................................................24 4.2.1 The food production benefits of urban agriculture ...........................25 4.2.2 Limitations of an urban agriculture model for food production ......................................................................................27 4.2.3 Best practices for maximizing food production in the city ...............28 4.3 Water management ..........................................................................................29 4.3.1 The benefits of urban agriculture for stormwater management ........30 4.3.2 Potential negative impacts of urban agriculture on water systems ...........................................................................................32 4.3.3 Best practices for maximizing synergies between urban agriculture and water systems ........................................................33 4.4 Soil ...................................................................................................................34 4.4.1 The benefits of urban agriculture for soil .........................................34 4.4.2 Risks and limitations of urban agriculture for improving soil health ..............................................................................................35 4.4.3 Best practices for improving soil health with urban agriculture ......................................................................................37 4.5 Biodiversity ......................................................................................................38 4.5.1 The benefits of urban agriculture for biodiversity ............................39 4.5.2 Limitations on urban agriculture’s ability to provide habitat ...........41 4.5.3 Best practices for maximizing biodiversity in an urban farm or garden ........................................................................................42 4.6 Climate mitigation ...........................................................................................44 4.6.1 The benefits of urban agriculture for climate mitigation and adaptation .......................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Change's Impact on Key Ecosystem Services and the Human
    US CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS Climate change’s impact on key ecosystem 483 services and the human well-being they support in the US Erik J Nelson1*, Peter Kareiva2, Mary Ruckelshaus3,4, Katie Arkema3,4, Gary Geller5, Evan Girvetz2,4, Dave Goodrich6, Virginia Matzek7, Malin Pinsky8, Walt Reid9, Martin Saunders7, Darius Semmens10, and Heather Tallis3† Climate change alters the functions of ecological systems. As a result, the provision of ecosystem services and the well-being of people that rely on these services are being modified. Climate models portend continued warming and more frequent extreme weather events across the US. Such weather-related disturbances will place a premium on the ecosystem services that people rely on. We discuss some of the observed and anticipated impacts of climate change on ecosystem service provision and livelihoods in the US. We also highlight promis- ing adaptive measures. The challenge will be choosing which adaptive strategies to implement, given limited resources and time. We suggest using dynamic balance sheets or accounts of natural capital and natural assets to prioritize and evaluate national and regional adaptation strategies that involve ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 2013; 11(9): 483–493, doi:10.1890/120312 limate change has altered and will continue to alter are ecosystem services. Climate change is expected to Cthe provision, timing, and location of ecosystem increasingly impact, both positively and negatively, the functions across landscapes. Ecosystem functions, such as provision and value of welfare-enhancing services in the nutrient recycling in soil and the timing and volume of US and around the world (Staudinger et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacquemontia Reclinata Grown in Containers
    REFEREED RESEARCH ARTICLE Shade limited root mass and carbohydrate reserves of the federally endangered Beach Photo by Joyce MaschinskiClustervine | Inset photo by Hannah Thorton Jacquemontia reclinata grown in containers ABSTRACT Anecdotal evidence suggested that germination and seedling Samuel J Wright and Matthew W Fidelibus | growth of the federally endangered beach clustervine (Jacque- montia reclinata [Convolvulaceae]) were best in the shade, but mature plants usually occur in coastal strand areas that are open or have low vegetation. We conducted an experiment using potted seedlings grown without shade, or under low, KEY WORDS moderate, or heavy shade enclosures. Shade did not affect revegetation, coastal strand, propagation, light shoot growth, or leaf or stem dry mass. Plants subjected to all levels of shade, however, had 40% to 70% less root dry NOMENCLATURE mass and about 50% lower root-to-shoot ratios than non- ITIS (2002) shaded plants. Moreover, the roots of non-shaded plants had 2 to 4 times more soluble sugars and starch than plants grown in shade. These findings suggest that when water and Figure 1. Federally endangered beach clustervine (Jacquemontia reclinata nutrition are not limiting, J. reclinata seedlings are best grown [Convolvulaceae]) blooming in its natural habitat. without shade. 27 NATIVEPLANTS | SPRING 2004 each clustervine (Jacquemontia reclinata House) is a reclinata has not been tested, although seedlings of a related perennial vine of the morning glory family (Con-volvu- plant, small-flower morning glory
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services and Natural Resources
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND NATURAL RESOURCES Porter Hoagland1*, Hauke Kite-Powell1, Di Jin1, and Charlie Colgan2 1Marine Policy Center Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543 2Center for the Blue Economy Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey Monterey, CA 93940 *Corresponding author. This working paper is a preliminary draft for discussion by participants at the Mid-Atlantic Blue Ocean Economy 2030 meeting. Comments and suggestions are wel- come. Please do not quote or cite without the permission of the authors. 1. Introduction All natural resources, wherever they are found, comprise physical features of the Earth that have economic value when they are in short supply. The supply status of natural resources can be the result of natural occurrences or affected by human degradation or restoration, new scientific in- sights or technological advances, or regulation. The economic value of natural resources can ex- pand or contract with varying environmental conditions, shifting human uses and preferences, and purposeful investments, depletions, or depreciation. It has now become common to characterize flows of goods and services from natural resources, referred to as “ecosystem” (or sometimes “environmental”) services (ESs). The values of ES flows can arise through direct, indirect, or passive uses of natural resources, in markets or as public goods, and a variety of methodologies have been developed to measure and estimate these values. Often the values of ES flows are underestimated or even ignored, and the resulting im- plicit subsidies may lead to the overuse or degradation of the relevant resources or even the broader environment (Fenichel et al. 2016). Where competing uses of resources are potentially mutually exclusive in specific locations or over time, it is helpful to be able to assess—through explicit tradeoffs—the values of ES flows that may be gained or lost when one or more uses are assigned or gain preferential treatment over others.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services of Collectively Managed Urban Gardens : Exploring Factors Affecting Synergies and Tradeoffs
    Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens : exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level Dennis, M and James, P http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.009 Title Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens : exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level Authors Dennis, M and James, P Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/42449/ Published Date 2017 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. 1 Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens: exploring factors affecting synergies 2 and trade-offs at the site level 3 4 Abstract 5 Collective management of urban green space is being acknowledged and promoted. The need to 6 understand productivity and potential trade-offs between co-occurring ecosystem services arising 7 from collectively managed pockets of green space is pivotal to the design and promotion of both 8 productive urban areas and effective stakeholder participation in their management. Quantitative 9 assessments of ecosystem service production were obtained from detailed site surveys at ten 10 examples of collectively managed urban gardens in Greater Manchester, UK. Correlation analyses 11 demonstrated high levels of synergy between ecological (biodiversity) and social (learning and well- 12 being) benefits related to such spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services and Australian Natural Resource Management (NRM) Futures
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND AUSTRALIAN NRM FUTURES Ecosystem Services and Australian Natural Resource Management (NRM) Futures Paper to the Natural Resource Policies and Programs Committee (NRPPC) and the Natural Resource Management Standing Committee (NRMSC) Prepared by the Ecosystem Services Working Group: Steven Cork (DEWHA, Canberra) Gary Stoneham (DSE, Victoria) Kim Lowe (DSE, Victoria) Drawing on input from: Kate Gainer (DEWHA, Canberra) Richard Thackway (DAFF, Canberra) August 2007 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND AUSTRALIAN NRM FUTURES © Commonwealth of Australia 2008 ISBN 9780642553874 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Australian Government, available from the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Assistant Secretary Biodiversity Conservation Branch Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Acknowledgements The Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts has collated and edited this paper for the Natural Resource Management Standing Committee. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this paper are factually correct, the Australian Government and members of the Natural Resource Management Standing Committee (or the governments that the committee members represent) do not accept responsibility
    [Show full text]
  • The Fairchild Tropical Garden NIXON SMILEY ______1
    ~GAZ.NE AMERICAN HORTI CULTURAL SOCIETY A vnion of the Ame'rican Horticultuml Society and the American Ho·rticultural Council 1600 BLADENSB URG ROAD, NORTHEAST . WASHINGTON 2, D. C. For Un ited H mticulture *** to accumulate, increase, and disseminate horticultuml infmmation B. Y. MORRISON, Editor Di?-ec to?'S T enns Expiring 1960 J AMES R. H ARLOW, Managing Editor D ONOVAN S. CORRELL T exas CARL "V. F ENN I NGER Editorial Committee Pennsylvania W. H . HODGE W'. H . HODGE, Chainnan Pen nS)1 Ivan i(~ ] OHN L. CREECH A. J. IRVI NG Yo?'k FREDElRI C P. L EE New "VILLIAM C. STEERE CONRAD B. LI NK New York CURTIS MAY FREDERICK G. MEYER T erms Ex1Jil'ing 1961 STUART M. ARMSTRONG 'WILBUR H. YOUNGMAN Maryland J OHN L. CREECH Maryland Officers 'WILLIAM H . FREDERICK, JR. DelawQ.j·e PR ES IDENT FRANCIS PATTESON-KNIGHT RICHARD P . 'WHITE V il'ginia Washington, D. C. DONALD WYMAN 111 assachv.setts FIRST VICE·PRESIDENT Tenns Expiring 1962 DONALD W YMAN Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts FREDERIC P. LEE Maryland HENRY T. SKINNER SECOND VICE- PRESIDENT Distl'ict of Columba STUART M. ARMSTRONG CEORGE H. SPALDING Silvel' Spring, Mal'yland California RICHARD P. WHITE SECRETARY-TREASURER District of Columbia OLIVE E. WEATHERELL AN NE " VERTSNER WOOD Washington, D. C. Pennsylvania The Amel'ican Ho'yticvltw'al Magazine is the official publication of the American Horticultural Society and is issued fo ur times a year during the q uarters commencing with January, April , July and October. It is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge in the science and art of growing ornamental plants, fruits, vegetables, and related subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Insight
    CLIMATE CHANGE & SUSTAINABILITY SERVICES Sustainable Insight The Nature of Ecosystem Service Risks for Business SPECIAL EDitiON IN COLLABOratiON With Fauna & FLORA InternatiONAL AND UNEP FI May 2011 2 | The Nature of Ecosystem Service Risks for Business About KPMG, UNEP FI and FFI KPMG, UNEP FI and FFI have produced this paper together drawing from research and projects they have done individually and together. KPMG Fauna & Flora International United Nations Environment KPMG is a global network of FFI is the world’s first established Programme Finance Initiative professional firms providing high-quality international conservation body, (UNEP FI) services in the field op audit, tax and founded in 1903. FFI acts to conserve The United Nations Environment advisory. We work for a wide range of threatened species and ecosystems Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) clients, both national and international worldwide, choosing solutions that is a unique global partnership between organisations. In the complexity of are sustainable, are based on sound the United Nations Environment today’s global landscape our clients science and take account of human Programme (UNEP) and the global are demanding more help in solving needs. Through its Global Business & financial sector. UNEP FI works closely complex issues, better integration and Biodiversity Programme, FFI aspires to with nearly 200 financial institutions collaboration across disciplines and create an environment where business that are Signatories to the UNEP FI faster returns on their investments has a long-term positive impact on Statements, and a range of partner through value-added partnerships. biodiversity conservation. organizations to develop and promote linkages between sustainability and KPMG’s Climate Change & www.fauna-flora.org financial performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Ecosystem Services and Intensified Cropping Systems Kenneth R
    doi:10.2489/jswc.72.3.64A FEATURE Soil ecosystem services and intensified cropping systems Kenneth R. Olson, Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Rattan Lal, and Lois Wright Morton fforts to meet the food and energy needs of an expanding world pop- Figure 1 ulation have led to a large-scale Agroecosystem services provided by soil organic carbon (SOC) in corn-based crop- E ping systems of agriculture (adapted from Adhikari and Hartemink [2016], table 2). expansion and intensification of crop production systems. A major challenge Provisioning services of the twenty-first century is ensuring an • Food and fuel adequate and reliable flow of essential eco- • Raw materials system services (Biggs et al. 2012; Hatfield • Fresh water/water retention, purification and Walthall 2015) as cropping systems Regulating services are intensified. Ecosystem services are the • Climate and greenhouse gas regulation provisioning, regulating, supporting, and • Water regulation cultural functions that soil, water, vegeta- • Erosion and flood control tion, and other natural resources provide • Pest and disease regulation • Carbon sequestration Copyright © 2017 Soil and Water Conservation Society. All rights reserved. (MEA 2005). The conversion of natu- Journal of Soil and Water Conservation • Water purification by denaturing of pollutants ral ecosystems to cultivated cropland has eroded the capacity to efficiently retain Cultural services and sequester soil organic carbon (SOC) • Recreational/ecotourism • Aesthetic/sense of place (Olson et al. 2012), an essential ecosystem • Knowledge/education/inspiration
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services And
    articles The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital Robert Costanza*†, Ralph d’Arge‡, Rudolf de Groot§, Stephen Farberk, Monica Grasso†, Bruce Hannon¶, ✩ Karin Limburg# , Shahid Naeem**, Robert V. O’Neill††, Jose Paruelo‡‡, Robert G. Raskin§§, Paul Suttonkk & Marjan van den Belt¶¶ * Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, Zoology Department, and † Insitute for Ecological Economics, University of Maryland, Box 38, Solomons, Maryland 20688, USA ‡ Economics Department (emeritus), University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82070, USA § Center for Environment and Climate Studies, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 9101, 6700 HB Wageninengen, The Netherlands k Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA ¶ Geography Department and NCSA, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA # Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, USA ** Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA †† Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA ‡‡ Department of Ecology, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Av. San Martin 4453, 1417 Buenos Aires, Argentina §§ Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California 91109, USA kk National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Department of Geography, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA ¶¶ Ecological Economics Research and Applications
    [Show full text]
  • The Harvard Garden in Cuba-A Brief History
    The Harvard Garden in Cuba-A Brief History Marion D. Cahan Begun in 1899, the Atkins Garden became a model for the development of many later tropical botanical gardens. The Harvard garden in Cuba was Harvard’s vir- Agriculture, to seek his opinion about expand- tually unknown jewel. Few people, other than ing the sugar cane industry in Cuba. Wilson those actively involved in the study of tropi- discouraged him, believing that the climate cal plants, have ever been aware of its exis- of Cuba was not suitable for the enterprise, tence. While the garden was primarily devoted and warned against spending large sums of to the improvement of sugar cane for commer- money on a wholly doubtful venture. Atkins’s cial purposes, it was also the site of research response at the time was, "When one lawyer in other areas of tropical agriculture and gives me advice that I do not like, I go to botany. The unique blend of economic real- another lawyer," and so he consulted Profes- ity and academic vision that characterized the sor George Goodale of Harvard for his opin- garden produced farsighted results that sub- ion, who in turn consulted his colleague, sequently served as a model for the develop- Professor Oakes Ames of the botany depart- ment of tropical botanical gardens in other ment. Both Goodale and Ames supported countries. Atkins’s proposal with enthusiasm, and his- As a center for tropical plant research and tory eventually proved Atkins right about the sugar cane investigation, the Harvard Botanic suitability of Cuba for expanded sugar cane Station was established on the Atkins sugar cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Invasive Landscape Plants with Fragrant Flowers
    Ornamentals and Flowers Feb. 2010 OF-46 Non-invasive Landscape Plants with Fragrant Flowers Patti Clifford1 and Kent Kobayashi2 1Hawaii Invasive Species Council, 2CTAHR Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences eeds are not friends to my garden. They cause To have a plant screened by one of the Hawaii Inva- more work and displace the flowers or vegetables sive Species Council’s weed risk assessment specialists, thatW I am trying to grow. But I do understand that in e-mail [email protected]. our multicultural world, a weed to one person may be a medicine, food, or ornamental to another. Plants have Characteristics of invasive plants many uses to humans; that is why we transport them with Many of the attributes that we appreciate in our garden us as we traverse the planet. and landscape plants contribute to their ability to invade In Hawai‘i, many of the native plants are endemic— natural and agricultural ecosystems. These include they are not found anywhere else in the world. This rarity • rapid growth has made them vulnerable to impacts from non-native • early maturity species. Some of the plants introduced here from other • heavy seed production regions become weeds and displace the native plants. • vegetative reproduction (i.e., pieces of roots, stems, While invasive weeds may cause trouble in my garden, or leaves can break off and grow into new plants; this they create havoc in Hawai‘i’s delicate native ecosystems. can happen when green waste or plant trimmings are Hawai‘i’s natural ecosystems have one of the worst discarded) weed problems in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss and Damage to Ecosystem Services
    Loss and Damage to Ecosystem Services Zinta Zommers, David Wrathall and Kees van der Geest December 2014 UNU-EHS Institute for Environment and Human Security This paper is part of a set of working papers that resulted from the Resilience Academy 2013-2014. United Nations University Institute of Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS) publishes these papers as part of its UNU-EHS Working Paper series. Series title: Livelihood Resilience in the Face of Global Environmental Change Paper title: Loss and Damage to Ecosystem Services Authors: Zinta Zommers, David Wrathall and Kees van der Geest Publication date: December 2014 This paper should be cited as: Zommers, Z., Wrathall, D. and van der Geest, K. (2014). Loss and Damage to Ecosystem Services. UNU-EHS Working Paper Series, No.2. Bonn: United Nations University Institute of Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS). Loss and Damage to Ecosystem Services Zommers, Z.1, Wrathall, D2, van der Geest, K2 1 Division of Early Warning and Assessment, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya 2 United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Environmental Migration, Social Vulnerability and Adaptation (EMSVA), Bonn, Germany Abstract Loss and damage has risen to global attention with the establishment of the ‘Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage associated with Climate Change Impacts’. While much of the discussion has focused on loss and damage to human livelihoods, climate change is also having a significant impact on ecosystems. The Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (2014) indicates that adaptation options for ecosystems may be more limited than for human systems and consequently loss and damage both to ecosystems, and to ecosystem services, may be expected.
    [Show full text]