Suratigraphy, Paleontology, and Geoliogy Ccfir Rtjllle Central Santa Cruz Mountains~ (California Coast Ranges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Suratigraphy, Paleontology, and Geoliogy Ccfir Rtjllle Central Santa Cruz Mountains~ (California Coast Ranges BUREPIV Of llti~N.ES U~~fo.~V ~BffiNfE. ~".1A$1J10 MAR1i 2 1982 l~~EASf ~rru~~ W U®~A~~ Suratigraphy, Paleontology, and Geoliogy CCfiR rtJllle Central Santa Cruz Mountains~ (California Coast Ranges CG lE ~ »JL «) ~G ll (~ A I.. S l T R V lE Y P R 0 JF 1E S § H 0 N A lL lF A lP IE. m. n n (fi § c/ I Stratigraphy, Paleontology, and Geology of the Central Santa Cruz Mountains, California Coast Ranges By JOSEPH C. CLARK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1168 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Clark, Joseph C. Stratigraphy, paleontology, and geology of the cen­ tral Santa Cruz Mountains, California Coast Ranges. (Geological Survey professional paper; 1168) Bibliography: p. 47-51 Supt. of ·Docs. no.; I 19.16:1168 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Tertiary. 2. Geology-­ California--Santa Cruz Mountains. I. Title. II. Series. QE691.C42 551.7'8'097947 81-607048 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Pat;c Page Stratigraphy northeast of San Gregorio Fault-Continued Abstract ................................................................................................... Middle Miocene sedimentary sequence ............... ·.................. 18. Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 Lompico Sandstone ............................................................. 18 Geography ..................................................................................... 1 Monterey Formation ........................................................... 20 Procedure ....................................................................................... 2 Depositional environment of middle Miocene Previous work ............................................................................... 4 sequence ............................................................................. 24 Acknowledgments ....................................................................... 5 Upper Miocene to Pliocene sedimentary sequence ........... 25 Geologic setting ................................................................................... 5 Santa Margarita Sandstone ............................................. 25 Crystalline rocks ................................................................................. 5 Santa Cruz Mudstone ......................................................... 30 Northeast of San Gregorio fault ............................................. 5 Purisima Formation ........................................................... 33 Southwest of San Gregorio fault ............................................. 7 Depositional environment of upper Miocene to Stratigraphy northeast of San Gregorio fault ........................... 7 Pliocene sedimentary sequence ................................... 35 Paleocene sedimentary sequence ..................................... :..... 7 Stratigraphy southwest of San Gregorio fault ........................... 36 Eocene to lower Miocene sedimentary sequence ............... 10 Pigeon Point Formation ...................................................... ~ .... 36 Butano Sandstone ............................................................... 10 Vaqueros(?) Formation ............................................................. 37 Lower sandstone member ......................................... 10 Monterey Formation .............. ~ .................................................... 38 Middle siltstone member ........................................... 11 Purisima Formation ................................................................... 39 Upper sandstone member ......................................... 11 Quaternary deposits ........................................................................... 40 'l'hickness ................................................. :..................... 12 Marine terrace deposits ............................................................. 40 Age ................................................................................... 12 River terrace deposits ................................................................. 41 Butano(?) Sandstone ........................................................... 12 Landslide material ..................................................................... 41 San Lorenzo Formation ..................................................... 13 Alluvium ......................................................................................... 41 Twobar Shale Member ............................................... 13 Structure ................................................................................................. 42 Rices Mudstone Member ........................................... 13 San Gregorio fault ....................................................................... 42 Zayante Sandstone ............................................................. 14 Zayante fault ................................................................................. 44 Vaqueros Sandstone ........................................................... 15 Minor faults ................................................................................... 45 Lan1bert Shale....................................................................... 16 Folds ................................................................................................. 45 Depositional environment of Eocene to lower Fossil localities ..................................................................................... 46 Miocene sedimentary sequence ................................... 17 References cited ................................................................................... 48 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLAn: 1. Geologic map and sections of the Ano Nuevo-Davenport area, San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties .................... In pocket 2. Geologic map and sections of the Felton-Santa Cruz area, Santa Cruz County, California ........................................ In pocket FIGUHE 1. Generalized geologic map of the northern and central Santa Cruz Mountains ............................................................................. 3 2. Composite stratigraphic section of Tertiary rocks of central Santa Cruz Mountains northeast of San Gregorio fault ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 3-13. Photographs showing: 3. Mudstone beds in lower part of Monterey Formation on north limb of Scotts Valley syncline ................................. 21 4. Siltstone beds in upper part of Monterey Formation on north limb of Scotts Valley syncline ................................. 22 5. Unconformable contact between Monterey and Santa Margarita Formations on north limb of Scotts Valley syncline ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 6. Crossbedded Santa Margarita Sandstone with thick gravel interbeds ............................................................................. 26 7. Astrodapsis beds in Santa Margarita Sandstone ................................................................................................................... 28 8. Astrodapsis beds in Santa Margarita Sandstone at USGS locality M5155 ..................................................................... 29 9. Santa Margarita Sandstone-Santa Cruz Mudstone contact on east side of Moore Creek canyon ........................... 29 10. Santa Cruz Mudstone capped by marine terrace sand at Natural Bridges Beach State Park near Santa Cruz ......................................................................................................................................................................... 30 11. Santa Cruz Mudstone overlain by Purisima Formation in sea cliffs below West Cliff Drive, Santa Cruz ................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 12. Mudstone member of the Purisima unconformable upon the Monterey east of Aiio Nuevo Point ........................... 39 13. Ai'io Nuevo fault east of Ai'io Nuevo Point ................................................................................................................................. 42 14. Contrasting stratigraphic sections across the San Gregorio fault in the central Santa Cruz Mountains ............................. 43 III IV CONTENTS TABLES Page TABLE 1. Paleocene megainvertebrates from the Locatelli Formation.............................................................................................................. 9 2. Terrigenous minerals of the Butano Sandstone .................................................................................................................................... 10 3. Megainvertebrates from the Vaqueros Sandstone................................................................................................................................ 16 4. Terrigenous minerals of the middle Miocene sequence.......................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • D.W. ALLEY & Associates Aquatic Biology
    D.W. ALLEY & Associates Aquatic Biology -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2006 Juvenile Steelhead Densities in the San Lorenzo, Soquel, Aptos and Corralitos Watersheds, Santa Cruz County, California Coastrange Sculpin Photographed by Jessica Wheeler D.W. ALLEY & Associates, Aquatic Biology Don Alley, Chad Steiner and Jerry Smith, Fishery Biologists With Field Assistance from Kristen Kittleson, Dawn Reis and Jessica Wheeler Prepared For the Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Department Government Center, 701 Ocean Street, Room 312, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Funding From the San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Soquel Creek Water District, Lompico County Water District, Cities of Santa Cruz and Watsonville and the County of Santa Cruz May 2007 Project # 200-04 340 Old River Lane • P.O. Box 200 • Brookdale, California 95007 • (831) 338-7971 TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT SUMMARY...................................................................................10 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................31 I-1. Steelhead and Coho Salmon Ecology...................................................... 31 I-3. Project Purpose and General Study Approach ........................................ 34 METHODS ....................................................................................................35 M-1. Choice of Reaches and Vicinity of Sites to be Sampled- Methods........... 35 M-2. Classification of Habitat Types and Measurement of Habitat Characteristics.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction San Andreas Fault: an Overview
    Introduction This volume is a general geology field guide to the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area. The first section provides a brief overview of the San Andreas Fault in context to regional California geology, the Bay Area, and earthquake history with emphasis of the section of the fault that ruptured in the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. This first section also contains information useful for discussion and making field observations associated with fault- related landforms, landslides and mass-wasting features, and the plant ecology in the study region. The second section contains field trips and recommended hikes on public lands in the Santa Cruz Mountains, along the San Mateo Coast, and at Point Reyes National Seashore. These trips provide access to the San Andreas Fault and associated faults, and to significant rock exposures and landforms in the vicinity. Note that more stops are provided in each of the sections than might be possible to visit in a day. The extra material is intended to provide optional choices to visit in a region with a wealth of natural resources, and to support discussions and provide information about additional field exploration in the Santa Cruz Mountains region. An early version of the guidebook was used in conjunction with the Pacific SEPM 2004 Fall Field Trip. Selected references provide a more technical and exhaustive overview of the fault system and geology in this field area; for instance, see USGS Professional Paper 1550-E (Wells, 2004). San Andreas Fault: An Overview The catastrophe caused by the 1906 earthquake in the San Francisco region started the study of earthquakes and California geology in earnest.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans Robert W. BOESSENECKER Department of Geology, University of Otago, 360 Leith Walk, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054 (New Zealand) and Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University 200 Traphagen Hall, Bozeman, MT, 59715 (USA) and University of California Museum of Paleontology 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA, 94720 (USA) [email protected] Boessenecker R. W. 2013. — A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans. Geodiversitas 35 (4): 815-940. http://dx.doi.org/g2013n4a5 ABSTRACT e newly discovered Upper Miocene to Upper Pliocene San Gregorio assem- blage of the Purisima Formation in Central California has yielded a diverse collection of 34 marine vertebrate taxa, including eight sharks, two bony fish, three marine birds (described in a previous study), and 21 marine mammals. Pinnipeds include the walrus Dusignathus sp., cf. D. seftoni, the fur seal Cal- lorhinus sp., cf. C. gilmorei, and indeterminate otariid bones. Baleen whales include dwarf mysticetes (Herpetocetus bramblei Whitmore & Barnes, 2008, Herpetocetus sp.), two right whales (cf. Eubalaena sp. 1, cf. Eubalaena sp. 2), at least three balaenopterids (“Balaenoptera” cortesi “var.” portisi Sacco, 1890, cf. Balaenoptera, Balaenopteridae gen. et sp. indet.) and a new species of rorqual (Balaenoptera bertae n. sp.) that exhibits a number of derived features that place it within the genus Balaenoptera. is new species of Balaenoptera is relatively small (estimated 61 cm bizygomatic width) and exhibits a comparatively nar- row vertex, an obliquely (but precipitously) sloping frontal adjacent to vertex, anteriorly directed and short zygomatic processes, and squamosal creases.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef-Coral Fauna of Carrizo Creek, Imperial County, California, and Its Significance
    THE REEF-CORAL FAUNA OF CARRIZO CREEK, IMPERIAL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE . .By THOMAS WAYLAND VAUGHAN . INTRODUCTION. occur has been determined by Drs . Arnold and Dall to be lower Miocene . The following conclusions seem warranted : Knowledge of the existence of the unusually (1) There was water connection between the Atlantic and interesting coral fauna here discussed dates Pacific across Central America not much previous to the from the exploration of Coyote Mountain (also upper Oligocene or lower Miocene-that is, during the known as Carrizo Mountain) by H . W. Fair- upper Eocene or lower Oligocene . This conclusion is the same as that reached by Messrs. Hill and Dall, theirs, how- banks in the early nineties.' Dr. Fairbanks ever, being based upon a study of the fossil mollusks . (2) sent the specimens of corals he collected to During lower Miocene time the West Indian type of coral Prof. John C. Merriam, at the University of fauna extended westward into the Pacific, and it was sub- California, who in turn sent them to me . sequent to that time that the Pacific and Atlantic faunas There were in the collection representatives of have become so markedly differentiated . two species and one variety, which I described As it will be made evident on subsequent under the names Favia merriami, 2 Stephano- pages that this fauna is much younger than ctenia fairbanksi,3 and Stephanoccenia fair- lower Miocene, the inference as to the date of banksi var. columnaris .4 As the geologic hori- the interoceanic connection given in the fore- zon was not even approximately known at that going quotation must be modified .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
    5 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space This chapter is a guide to the parks, recreation and open space resources in Humboldt County. Humboldt is home to recreational, park, and open space resources of statewide, nationwide, and even global significance. With this in mind, the first two sections describe these resources, while the final section addresses existing policies and policy issues identified during Phase I along with policy options that respond to them. 5.1 PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES Humboldt County has a wealth of outdoor recreational opportunities and areas of incomparable value and unsurpassed beauty. More than twenty percent of the county’s 2.3 million acres are protected open space, forests, and recreation areas. Within the county boundaries, there are 4 federal parks and beaches, 10 state parks (3 of which are encompassed by Redwood National Park), 16 county parks and beaches, recreational areas and reserves, and National Parkland and National Forest land. These areas contribute to the quality of life in Humboldt County and provide needed recreation opportunities for residents of neighboring counties and from all over the world as well. Parklands are important elements of the Humboldt economy through both their role in the timber industry and the tourist industry. As tourism eclipses timber as the stronghold of Humboldt’s economy, parks and recreational resources will prove of greater and greater value to Humboldt’s future. The natural qualities of Humboldt County attract a great many people from outside the county. The tourist industry and demand for park resources in Humboldt are linked to the accessibility of parkland.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Central and Southern Coast Ranges of California
    OVERVIEW Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California Benjamin M. Page* Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 George A. Thompson† Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215 Robert G. Coleman Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 ABSTRACT within the Coast Ranges is ascribed in large Taliaferro (e.g., 1943). A prodigious amount of part to the well-established change in plate mo- geologic mapping by T. W. Dibblee, Jr., pre- The central and southern Coast Ranges tions at about 3.5 Ma. sented the areal geology in a form that made gen- of California coincide with the broad Pa- eral interpretations possible. E. H. Bailey, W. P. cific–North American plate boundary. The INTRODUCTION Irwin, D. L. Jones, M. C. Blake, and R. J. ranges formed during the transform regime, McLaughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey and but show little direct mechanical relation to The California Coast Ranges province encom- W. R. Dickinson are among many who have con- strike-slip faulting. After late Miocene defor- passes a system of elongate mountains and inter- tributed enormously to the present understanding mation, two recent generations of range build- vening valleys collectively extending southeast- of the Coast Ranges. Representative references ing occurred: (1) folding and thrusting, begin- ward from the latitude of Cape Mendocino (or by these and many other individuals were cited in ning ca. 3.5 Ma and increasing at 0.4 Ma, and beyond) to the Transverse Ranges. This paper Page (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Unit-V Evolution of Horse
    UNIT-V EVOLUTION OF HORSE Horses (Equus) are odd-toed hooped mammals belong- ing to the order Perissodactyla. Horse evolution is a straight line evolution and is a suitable example for orthogenesis. It started from Eocene period. The entire evolutionary sequence of horse history is recorded in North America. " Place of Origin The place of origin of horse is North America. From here, horses migrated to Europe and Asia. By the end of Pleis- tocene period, horses became extinct in the motherland (N. America). The horses now living in N. America are the de- scendants of migrants from other continents. Time of Origin The horse evolution started some 58 million years ago, m the beginning of Eocene period of Coenozoic era. The modem horse Equus originated in Pleistocene period about 2 million years ago. Evolutionary Trends The fossils of horses that lived in different periods, show that the body parts exhibited progressive changes towards a particular direction. These directional changes are called evo- lutionary trends. The evolutionary trends of horse evolution are summarized below: 1. Increase in size. 2. Increase in the length of limbs. 3. Increase in the length of the neck. 4. Increase in the length of preorbital region (face). 5. Increase in the length and size of III digit. 6. Increase in the size and complexity of brain. 7. Molarization of premolars. Olfactory bulb Hyracotherium Mesohippus Equus Fig.: Evolution of brain in horse. 8. Development of high crowns in premolars and molars. 9. Change of plantigrade gait to unguligrade gait. 10. Formation of diastema. 11. Disappearance of lateral digits.
    [Show full text]
  • San Lorenzo Urban River Plan
    San Lorenzo Urban River Plan A Plan for the San Lorenzo River, Branciforte Creek and Jessie Street Marsh Prepared by: City of Santa Cruz San Lorenzo Urban River Plan Task Force with assistance from Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program of the National Park Service Adopted June 24, 2003 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 5 Chapter 19 Purpose, Context and Goals 1.1 Purpose of the San Lorenzo Urban River Plan 9 1.2 Goals and Benefits of the Plan 10 1.3 The Planning Area and River Reach Descriptions 10 1.4 Relationship to Existing City Plans 13 1.5 Plan Organization 13 Chapter 2 15 Plan Setting and Background 2.1 Physical Setting 15 2.2 Social Setting: Development of the City of Santa Cruz 17 2.3 The History of Flooding in Santa Cruz 18 2.4 Current Planning and the San Lorenzo Urban River Plan Task Force 19 Chapter 3 21 Riverwide Concepts and Programs 3.1 The San Lorenzo Riverway 21 3.2 Defining the Riverway: System-wide Recommendations 22 Chapter 4 23 Reach Specific Recommendations 4.1 Design Improvements 25 4.2 Site Specific Recommendations in River Reaches 29 Estuarine Reach 29 Transitional Reach 39 Riverine Reach 49 Chapter 5 55 Branciforte Creek 5.1 Area Description and Current Conditions 55 5.2 Reach Specific Recommendations for Branciforte Creek 58 Chapter 6 61 Significant Riverfront Areas 6.1 Front Street Riverfront Area 61 6.2 Salz Tannery to 64 Sycamore Grove Riverfront Area 6.3 Beach Flats Riverfront Area 71 Chapter 7 73 Plan Implementation 7.1 San Lorenzo River Committee 73 Recommendations 74 7.2 Project Phasing and Projected Costs 75 7.3 Funding Opportunities 75 Chapter 8 79 References Appendix A Lower San Lorenzo River and Lagoon Enhancement Plan Appendix B Jessie Street Marsh Management Plan PB SAN LORENZO URBAN RIVER PLAN The San Lorenzo Urban River Plan could Acknowledgements not have been developed without the dedication of the San Lorenzo Urban River Plan Task Force, City staff and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Gems of California's State Parks
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA – EDMUND G. BROWN JR., GOVERNOR NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY – JOHN LAIRD, SECRETARY CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION – LISA MANGAT, DIRECTOR JOHN D. PARRISH, Ph.D., STATE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION – DAVID BUNN, DIRECTOR PLATE 1 The rugged cliffs of Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park are composed of some of California’s Bio-regions the most tortured, twisted, and mobile rocks of the North American continent. The California’s Geomorphic Provinces rocks are mostly buried beneath soils and covered by vigorous redwood forests, which thrive in a climate famous for summer fog and powerful winter storms. The rocks only reveal themselves in steep stream banks, along road and trail cut banks, along the precipitous coastal cliffs and offshore in the form of towering rock monuments or sea stacks. (Photograph by CalTrans staff.) Few of California’s State parks display impressive monoliths adorned like a Patrick’s Point State Park displays a snapshot of geologic processes that have castle with towering spires and few permit rock climbing. Castle Crags State shaped the face of western North America, and that continue today. The rocks Park is an exception. The scenic beauty is best enjoyed from a distant exposed in the seacliffs and offshore represent dynamic interplay between the vantage point where one can see the range of surrounding landforms. The The Klamath Mountains consist of several rugged ranges and deep canyons. Klamath/North Coast Bioregion San Joaquin Valley Colorado Desert subducting oceanic tectonic plate (Gorda Plate) and the continental North American monolith and its surroundings are a microcosm of the Klamath Mountains The mountains reach elevations of 6,000 to 8,000 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Barren Ridge FEIS-Volume IV Paleo Tech Rpt Final March
    March 2011 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PROJECT NUMBER: 115244 PROJECT CONTACT: MIKE STRAND EMAIL: [email protected] PHONE: 714-507-2710 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PREPARED FOR: LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER 111 NORTH HOPE STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 PREPARED BY: POWER ENGINEERS, INC. 731 EAST BALL ROAD, SUITE 100 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 DEPARTMENT OF PALEOSERVICES SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM PO BOX 121390 SAN DIEGO, CA 92112 ANA 032-030 (PER-02) LADWP (MARCH 2011) SB 115244 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY PERSONNEL ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Construction of New 230 kV Double-Circuit Transmission Line ........................................ 4 1.2.2 Addition of New 230 kV Circuit ......................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Reconductoring of Existing Transmission Line .................................................................. 14 1.2.4 Construction of New Switching Station .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Sea Drilling Project Initial Reports Volume 13
    M. HAJOS 34.5. THE MEDITERRANEAN DIATOMS Marta Hajos, Hungarian Geological Institute, Budapest, Hungary INTRODUCTION species. The relevant information has been obtained from the references cited at the end of this chapter and from Ten washed samples taken at eight levels from the drill investigations of Hungarian fossiliferous localities. cores of the Mediterranean expedition of the Deep Sea The 175 taxa investigated belong primarily to the phyla Drilling Project were sent for study to the present writer by Chrysophyta and Bacillariophyta, and are accompanied in Paulian Dumitrica of the Geological Institute, Bucharest, subordinate numbers by representatives of Phytolitharia, Rumania. He had found these samples to be the richest Acritarcha, Radiolaria and Porifera. diatom-bearing sediments both in terms of species and The paleoecological assignments shown in Table 1 and individuals. the complete floral spectrum allow three paleo-ecological Two samples from Core 13 of Site 124—Balearic Rise1 divisions, representing three areas of the Mediterranean and were selected near levels of finely laminated dolomitic three different sedimentary facies, to be distinguished. marls with dark green to black interbeds. This dolomitic unit is part of the evaporite series cored in the deep Balearic Division 1 — Siliceous Dolomitic Marls of Site 124 Basin. All six samples from Sites 127 and 128 in the 2 Hellenic Trench of the Ionian Basin are from layers of The sediments of the two samples from Site 124 dark sapropelitic ooze, where the siliceous microfauna is (124-13-2, 89-90 cm and 124-13-2, 127-129 cm) were particularly abundant. The remaining two samples are from apparently deposited under the same ecological conditions.
    [Show full text]