Physiology and Biochemistry of 'Rocha' Pear During
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Demand for Apples Grow but Stays Flat for Pears and Grapes Fresh
THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 12/2/2013 GAIN Report Number: RSATO1319 Russian Federation Fresh Deciduous Fruit Annual Demand for Apples Grow but Stays Flat for Pears and Grapes Approved By: Erik W. Hansen Prepared By: Svetlana Ilyina & Erik W. Hansen Report Highlights: Russia is the largest global importer of apples and pears. In marketing year (MY) 2013, Russian imports of apples are expected to grow slightly while imports of pears and grapes are forecast to remain flat. Post forecasts apple production at 1.2 million metric tons (MMT) in MY 13, down 5 percent than the previous year. Commercial pear production in MY 13 is forecast to remain flat compared to the previous year. The Russian government has allocated funds devoted to horticulture development including: partial reimbursement for new orchard planting and for old orchard removal, cultivation development, financial support for research in new varieties and seed breeding. Executive Summary: Russia is the largest global importer of apples and pears. In marketing year (MY) 2013, Russian imports of apples are expected to grow slightly while imports of pears and grapes are forecast to remain flat. Post forecasts apple production at 1.2 million metric tons (MMT) in MY 13, down 5 percent than the previous year. More than 60 percent of the apple crop in Russia is cultivated by the households for personal consumption or sales within the season in outdoor markets. In 2013, the average apple yield per hectare in Russia was around 6.9 tons per ha attributed mainly to low yields in older orchards which make up 70 percent of total area planted according to some industry estimates. -
Tapas Simposio Peras
GROWln ~J. AÁl-Ja ttvlv~,~V'J XIII INTERNATIONAL PEAR SYMPOSIUM monTEUIDEO - URUGUAY 1 1 DECEffiBER 4" - 7" 2018 Municipal Palace, Montevideo, Uruguay www.pear2018.uy Argentina 1 1 Belgium M.C. Dussi Serge Remy Universidad Nacional de Comahue Jeff Vercammen Gabriela Calvo PC Fruits María Dolores Raffo INTA - China ... Germany Yuanwen Teng Michael Blanke Zhejiang University University of Bonn m Portugal Karen 1Theron Cristina Ollvelra Un iversity of Stellen bosch Instituto Superior de Agronomía ® 1 United States of America .:....- spa1n . Amit Dhingra Luis Asin Stefano Musacchi IRTA Washington State University Todd Einhorn Michigan State University ~ Uruguay Rachel Elkins Danilo Cabrera University of California Cooperative Extension Terence Robinson Alicia Castillo Cornell Univesity Carolina Leoni Diego Maesa Valentina Mujica Jorge Soria Roberto Zoppolo INIA Pedro Mondino Vivian Severino Ana Cecilia Silveira Facultad de Agronomía Organizing committee Conveners Financia! administration Roberto Zoppolo Esteban Cisneros Danilo Cabrera Communication Support group Mónica Trujillo Maximiliano Dini Carolina Fasiolo Web Valentina Mujica María Emilia Guinovart Julio Pisano Pablo Rodríguez ~ Contact lnformation Yésica Bernaschina ..WWW Website: www.pear2018.uy '-"" E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 978-9974-38-421-7 Declarations of interest and sponsorship The XIII lnternational Pear Symposium has been declared as an event of public interest by: UruguayNatura/ mee MINISTERIO DE GANADERÍA AGRICULTURA Y PESCA Ministerio de Turismo r.f.11 Intendencia Sponsored by: im de Montevideo Host country Uruguay is a country in Southern South America, bordering the South Atlantic Ocean, between Argentina and Brazil. With an area of approximately 176,000 km 2, Uruguay is geographically the second-smallest nation in South America, afterSuriname. -
Composition and Storage of Pear Cultivars from Nagykanizsa
International Journal of Horticultural Science 2011, 17 (1 –2): 63 –68. Agroinform Publishing House, Budapest, Printed in Hungary ISSN 1585-0404 Composition and storage of pear cultivars from Nagykanizsa Tóth-Markus, M. 1, Bánáti, D. 1, Adányi, N. 1, Boross, F. 1, Konrád-Németh, C. 2, Szabó, Z., 3 Soltész, M. 4 & Nyéki, J. 3 1Central Food Research Institute, Hungary, H-1022 Budapest, Herman Ottó Street 15 tel.: +36 1 3558838 e-mail: [email protected] 2Gyümölcskert cPlc Hungary, H-8900 Nagykanizsa, Csengery street 90 3University of Debrecen Centre for Agricultural and Applied Economic Sciences, H-4032 Debrecen, Böszörményi út 138., Hungary 4Collage of Kecskemét, Faculty of Horticulture, H-6000 Kecskemét, Erdei Ferenc tér 1 –3. Summary: The composition of five pear varieties (‘Abate Fètel’, ‘Bosc’, ‘Williams’, ‘Conference’, ‘Packham’s Triumph’) grown in Nagy- kanizsa was investigated in three consecutive years (2008, 2009, 2010). A storage experiment was performed in 2008. Four winter pear cultivars were kept in an ULO store for four months and their parameters measured after two and four months. The parameters tested were: size, weight, water soluble solids, titratable acidity, glucose, fructose, sucrose, water soluble pectin, total polyphenols, free radical scavenging capacity, copper and zinc content. The fruits of ‘Conference’ and ‘Bosc’ varieties were found to contain the highest sucrose and total sugar content, while ‘Abate Fétel’ had the lowest sucrose and highest glucose levels among cultivars tested. ‘Williams’ pear was the most acidic. Brix, total sugar, sucrose and water soluble pectin were decreased during storage. Titratable acidity slightly decreased in fruits of Conference pear. -
Apples & Pears
Marcher Apple Network APPLES & PEARS Volume 3 No 1 Non-members £2 Autumn 2019 © Steve Hughes Reviving the old varieties of apples and pears in the Marcher counties www.marcherapple.net1 Apples & Pears Autumn 2019 Apples &www.marcherapple.net Pears Autumn 2019 Man’s official business: Chairman’s report AGM Notice CURRENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE work of members and others, many local (Officers): Peter Austerfield, Sheila Leitch, apple varieties once thought to be lost. These Notice is hereby given that the 25th ANNUAL Wade Muggleton, Daniela Bergman, David ‘finds’ have been propagated and planted in GENERAL MEETING will be held at the Cider Olivier, Andy Pillow, Stephen Ainsleigh Rice, its orchards. Gradually this has established Museum, Ryelands Street, Hereford, on David Smith. All of these have indicated they a valuable local heritage orchard collection. Saturday 16th November at 11:00. The are willing to continue serving subject to purpose of the AGM includes receiving and, member and Board approval. Whilst MAN continues to look for other old if thought fit, accepting the annual report and varieties with local connections, its focus is accounts, and electing four Trustees to the Any member who would like to join the becoming more directed towards ensuring Board. Committee is cordially invited to do so. The the well-being of the collection — increasing process is that any member nominated is knowledge about the varieties, and conserving Coffee will be available from 10.30 a.m. subject to Board Approval. Nomination may be them as a living genetic resource for future made at any time, for instance you can contact generations. -
Increase of Calcium in 'Rocha' Pear (Pyrus Communis
Proceeding Paper Increase of Calcium in ‘Rocha’ Pear (Pyrus communis L.) for Development of Functional Foods † Cláudia Campos Pessoa 1,2,* , Ana Rita F. Coelho 1,2 , Ana Coelho Marques 1,2 , Inês Carmo Luís 1,2 , Diana Daccak 1,2 , Maria Manuela Silva 2,3 , José C. Ramalho 2,4 , Manuela Simões 1,2 , Fernando H. Reboredo 1,2 , Maria F. Pessoa 1,2 , Paulo Legoinha 1,2 , Paula Scotti Campos 2,5, Isabel P. Pais 2,5 and Fernando C. Lidon 1,2 1 Earth Sciences Department, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] (A.R.F.C.); [email protected] (A.C.M.); [email protected] (I.C.L.); [email protected] (D.D.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (F.H.R.); [email protected] (M.F.P.); [email protected] (P.L.); [email protected] (F.C.L.) 2 GeoBioTec Research Center, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] (M.M.S.); [email protected] (J.C.R.); [email protected] (P.S.C.); [email protected] (I.P.P.) 3 ESEAG/Grupo Universidade Lusófona, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal 4 PlantStress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais, Instituto Superior Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 2784-505 Oeiras, Portugal 5 INIAV, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +351-212-948-573 † Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science, 1–15 December 2020; Available online: https://iecps2020.sciforum.net/. -
Insect Pollinators of Conference Pear (Pyrus Communis L.) and Their Contribution to Fruit Quality
Journal of Pollination Ecology, 25(10), 2019, pp 103-114 INSECT POLLINATORS OF CONFERENCE PEAR (PYRUS COMMUNIS L.) AND THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO FRUIT QUALITY Michelle. T. Fountain*, Zeus Mateos-Fierro, Bethan Shaw, Phil Brain, Alvaro Delgado NIAB EMR, New Road, East Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ Abstract—The pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivar, Conference, is parthenocarpic but misshapes and marketable fruit losses of 6% at harvest are common. In other studies, insect flower visitors are identified as important for apple quality, but far fewer studies have examined the effects of insects and cross-pollination on pear quality. Using a range of replicated field experiments, this project aimed to determine the; 1) biodiversity of pear blossom insect visitors, 2) pollen limitation and fruit quality as a function of distance from the orchard edge and number of insect visitors, and 3) importance of cross pollination on fruit quality. A wide range of insects, >30 species, visited pear flowers including honey bees, bumble bees, solitary bees and hoverflies. Honey bees were the most frequent visitors, but all guilds, to a greater or lesser extent, made contact with the reproductive parts of the flower. Insect visits resulted in ~10% higher fruit set. There was no effect of distance from the edge (up to 50 m) of orchard on the quality of pears, and no consistent difference in the guild of insects visiting at distances from the orchard boundary. Cross-pollination with the variety Concorde produced better quality Conference fruits. We discuss how pollination of Conference pears could be managed to improve yields of marketable fruit.