Mormonism and Torture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mormonism and Torture 69-71_Petersen_torture.qxp 5/14/2008 2:14 PM Page 69 SUNSTONE MORMONS AND POLITICS Mormons are also inspired by the story of the two thousand stripling soldiers, who “took their weapons of war to defend their country” (Alma 53:18). MORMONISM AND TORTURE— On the other hand, one of the most moving Book of Mormon narratives involves PARADOXES AND FIRST PRINCIPLES the people of Ammon, who, after their con- version, made an oath never to shed blood again and “buried their weapons of war deep By Boyd Petersen in the earth” (Alma 26:32). As a result, many of them “laid down their lives . because of their love and of their hatred to sin” (Alma 26:34). The Doctrine and Covenants calls on ITT ROMNEY’S CAMPAIGN for this is an accurate reflection of what Romney Church members to “renounce war and pro- the presidency put Mormonism would have advocated as president, or claim peace” (D&C 98:16). It is also impor- M into the spotlight even though simply the type of political bravado we ex- tant to note that the Book of Mormon (and, Romney tried time and again to shove it back pect in political debates, there were legiti- within it, the Book of Ether) ends with unre- into the wings. While Romney had to face mate reasons to reflect on how Romney’s strained warfare’s ultimate result: the com- questions about whether he is really a Mormonism might have influenced his ac- plete annihilation of a people. Any positive Christian, about whether his allegiance to a tions regarding torture should he have been message given about warfare is undermined Mormon prophet would come before his al- elected. by the Book of Mormon’s tragic ending. legiance to the Constitution, and even about his Mormon underwear, it was sometimes IKE any religion, Mormonism thrives HE ways this paradox has influenced difficult to see how his religion affects his po- on paradox. Inevitably two funda- individual Mormons have recently litical beliefs. His shift on abortion was char- L mental but contradictory proposi- T found their way into the news. In acterized as political expedience: some saw it tions, both established as true, will come into July 2007, Vanity Fair published an article as pandering to the evangelical community conflict. While Mormonism shares with that disclosed the fact that the two authors of while others viewed his original pro-choice Christianity the violent Old Testament scrip- the new torture techniques being practiced position as pandering to the more liberal tures in which God commands Israel to de- by CIA interrogators are both Mormon psy- Massachusetts voters. On 60 Minutes, he stroy other nations, as well as the pacifism of chologists: James Elmer Mitchell and Bruce dodged a question about polygamy by New Testament scriptures advocating Jessen—who, because of their shared reli- stating that he couldn’t “imagine anything “turning the other cheek,” Mormonism’s own gion, were referred to by colleagues as the more awful than polygamy.”1 He tried to scriptures also provide paradoxical state- “Mormon mafia.” In addition to devising or slough off a Newsweek reporter’s question ments about war and human rights. On the adapting the new information extraction about whether or not he practiced baptism one hand, the Book of Mormon begins with techniques, Mitchell and Jessen also were put for the dead, a practice which has attracted Nephi’s being commanded to cut off Laban’s in charge of training interrogators in these controversy over ordinances performed for head after Laban had spurned repeated at- new techniques—including “water- Jews killed in the Holocaust, by stating, “I tempts to acquire the brass plates and had boarding”—at CIA “black sites” throughout have in my life, but I haven’t recently.”2 threatened to slay Nephi and his brothers. the world. Because of these many attempts to mini- The justification for Nephi’s slaying Laban is Steve Kleinman, an Air Force Reserve mize his Mormonism during his campaign, it that “it is better that one man should perish colonel and expert in military intelligence, should come as no surprise that the question than that a nation should dwindle and perish notes the peculiarity of the CIA’s choosing of how his Mormon beliefs would influence in unbelief” (1 Nephi 4:13).4 Since Nephi ob- “two clinical psychologists who had no intel- his views on controversial interrogation tech- tained information (i.e., his family’s records) ligence background whatsoever, who had niques such as waterboarding largely re- at the cost of one man’s life, this story could never conducted an interrogation . to do mained unasked. In one of the Republican be read as support for the position that ob- something that had never been proven in the presidential debates, Romney was asked taining from detainees information that could real world.” Another terrorism expert, about these techniques and responded by keep a nation safe is worth the suffering of a Michael Rolince, described the tactics as suggesting we should double the size of detainee in Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib. “voodoo science.” Rolince said that the goal Guantanamo Bay. “I don’t want them on our Then there are the emotionally stirring words was to “break down” the suspects “through soil,” Romney stated. “I want them on of Captain Moroni as he rallies his army to isolation, white noise, completely take away Guantanamo, where they don’t get the access war and writes on his “standard of liberty” the their ability to predict the future, [and] create to lawyers that they get when they’re on our words: “In memory of our God, our religion, dependence on investigators.” Although the soil. I don’t want them in our prisons. I want and freedom, and our peace, our wives, and Bush administration claimed that interroga- them there.”3 While it is hard to tell whether our children” (Alma 46:12–13). Many young tors received careful training, many actually received only “on-the-job training during brutal interrogations that effectively unfolded BOYD PETERSEN has a Ph.D. in comparative literature and is the program coordi- as live demonstrations.” Kleinman feels that nator for Mormon Studies at Utah Valley State College. He is the author of the award- Mitchell and Jessen “have caused more harm winning biography Hugh Nibley: A Consecrated Life and is SUNSTONE’S to American national security than they’ll “Mormonism and politics” editor. ever understand.”5 APRIL 2008 PAGE 69 69-71_Petersen_torture.qxp 5/14/2008 2:14 PM Page 70 SUNSTONE nically one is prepared to do this, there are a whole lot of reasons you don’t want to do this, some of them morally based.”8 The Mormon psychologists who devised the HE torture debate became tragically new torture techniques “have caused more personal for one Mormon soldier. T Alyssa Peterson, a returned mis- harm to American national security than sionary with a gift for language, earned a psy- chology degree from Northern Arizona they’ll ever understand.” University on a military scholarship. After graduation, she went to the Defense Language Institute, where she quickly Coincidentally, defending the use of these professor at William and Mary, asked learned Arabic. At 27, she was sent to Iraq, questionable interrogation techniques fell to whether the LDS gospel commits Mormons where she served in an intelligence unit as- another Mormon, Judge Jay Bybee, a grad- to a particular ethical approach. He noted signed to a prison at Tal-Afar, in north- uate of BYU law school. In August 2002, that “if we are utilitarians,” it might be western Iraq, conducting interrogations and Bybee was the head of the Justice morally justifiable to torture someone in translating enemy documents. On 15 Department’s Office of Legal Counsel. Bybee order to get information they had about a September 2003, the military reported that signed off on a controversial memorandum ticking bomb that was set to go off in an or- she had been killed by “non-hostile weapons stating that any interrogation techniques phanage; but, he writes, “it is probably not discharge,” only the third female soldier were legally permissible as long as the pain morally justifiable if we are Kantians.” Oman killed in Iraq. Her father reported to co- they caused was less than “serious physical notes that Burk’s argument rests upon the workers the day before her death that he had injury, such as organ failure, impairment of view that “good Mormons must be a premonition that his daughter was in bodily functions or even death.” If the intent Kantians,” but Oman also recognizes the trouble. is to gain information rather than cause paradox discussed above as he writes, “On An NPR reporter for KNAU in Flagstaff, harm, the memo reasoned, the technique the other hand, one can point to fairly utili- Arizona, Kevin Elston, also had a feeling that would be justifiable and could not be classi- tarian moral claims in scripture.”6 something was wrong—in this case with the fied as torture. Peggy Fletcher Stack summarized the de- Army’s official explanation. Upon filing a While the memo was eventually dis- bate within the Mormon community in a Salt Freedom of Information Act request, he dis- avowed by the White House, it caused a con- Lake Tribune article. She quoted Fred covered that Alyssa Peterson had died of a troversy, including among Latter-day Saints. Gedicks, a BYU law professor who refused to self-inflicted gunshot wound. Peterson had Dan Burk, an LDS law professor at the defend Bybee’s memo but added that “it’s fine objected to the interrogation techniques University of Minnesota, was irate and to talk about the teachings of the Savior about being used on prisoners, and after just two started a debate about the memo on the peace, but when the other side is not living nights working in “the cage,” she refused to Mormon blog Times and Seasons.
Recommended publications
  • Mitchell James 01.16.17.Ptx
    Case 2:15-cv-00286-JLQ Document 176-1 Filed 05/22/17 Exhibit 1 Case 2:15-cv-00286-JLQ Document 176-1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SPOKANE - - - SULEIMAN ABDULLAH : SALIM, MOHOMED AHMED : DOCKET NO. BEN SOUD, OBAID ULLAH : (as personal : 2:15-CV-286-JLQ representative of GUL : RAHMAN), : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : JAMES ELMER MITCHELL : and JOHN "BRUCE" : JESSEN, : : Defendants. : - - - Monday, January 16, 2017 - - - Videotaped deposition of JAMES E. MITCHELL taken pursuant to notice, was held at the law offices of Blank Rome, 130 N. 18th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, beginning at 10:13 AM, on the above date, before Constance S. Kent, a Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. * * * MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES (866) 624-6221 www.MagnaLS.com Case 2:15-cv-00286-JLQ Document 176-1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 6 Page 8 1 NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are 2 Exhibit 20 Fax, Generic Description 321 of the Process, Bates 2 now on the record. 3 DOJ OLC 1126 through 3 This begins DVD No. 1 in the 1144 4 4 deposition of James Elmer Mitchell Exhibit 21 CIA Comments on the 323 5 in the matter of Salim versus 5 Senate Select Committee James Elmer Mitchell and Bruce -- on Intelligence Report 6 6 on the Rendition, 7 John Bruce Jessen in the United Detention and 8 States District Court for the 7 Interrogation Program 8 Exhibit 22 Document, Bates USA 1629 335 9 Eastern District of Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • True and False Confessions: the Efficacy of Torture and Brutal
    Chapter 7 True and False Confessions The Efficacy of Torture and Brutal Interrogations Central to the debate on the use of “enhanced” interrogation techniques is the question of whether those techniques are effective in gaining intelligence. If the techniques are the only way to get actionable intelligence that prevents terrorist attacks, their use presents a moral dilemma for some. On the other hand, if brutality does not produce useful intelligence — that is, it is not better at getting information than other methods — the debate is moot. This chapter focuses on the effectiveness of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation technique program. There are far fewer people who defend brutal interrogations by the military. Most of the military’s mistreatment of captives was not authorized in detail at high levels, and some was entirely unauthorized. Many military captives were either foot soldiers or were entirely innocent, and had no valuable intelligence to reveal. Many of the perpetrators of abuse in the military were young interrogators with limited training and experience, or were not interrogators at all. The officials who authorized the CIA’s interrogation program have consistently maintained that it produced useful intelligence, led to the capture of terrorist suspects, disrupted terrorist attacks, and saved American lives. Vice President Dick Cheney, in a 2009 speech, stated that the enhanced interrogation of captives “prevented the violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent people.” President George W. Bush similarly stated in his memoirs that “[t]he CIA interrogation program saved lives,” and “helped break up plots to attack military and diplomatic facilities abroad, Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf in London, and multiple targets in the United States.” John Brennan, President Obama’s recent nominee for CIA director, said, of the CIA’s program in a televised interview in 2007, “[t]here [has] been a lot of information that has come out from these interrogation procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • ACLU-RDI 6808 P.1 Page 2 1 2 January 31, 2017 3 12:19 P.M
    Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Civil Action No. 2:15-CV-286-JLQ -----------------------------------) SULEIMAN ABDULLAH SALIM, MOHAMED AHMED BEN SOUD, OBAID ULLAH (AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF GUL RAHMAN), Plaintiffs, vs. JAMES ELMER MITCHELL and JOHN "BRUCE" JESSEN, Defendants. -----------------------------------) DEPOSITION OF OBAIDULLAH New York, New York January 31, 2017 Reported by: Linda Salzman, RPR Job No. 17896 TransPerfect Legal Solutions 212-400-8845 - [email protected] ACLU-RDI 6808 p.1 Page 2 1 2 January 31, 2017 3 12:19 p.m. 4 5 Deposition of OBAIDULLAH, the 6 witness herein, held at the offices 7 of American Civil Liberties Union, 8 125 Broad Street, New York, New 9 York, pursuant to Notice, before 10 Linda Salzman, a Notary Public of 11 the State of New York. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TransPerfect Legal Solutions 212-400-8845 - [email protected] ACLU-RDI 6808 p.2 Page 3 1 2 A P P E A R A N C E S: 3 4 On Behalf of Plaintiffs: 5 Gibbons, PC 6 One Gateway Center 7 Newark, New Jersey 07102-5310 8 (973) 596-4731 9 BY: LAWRENCE S. LUSTBERG, ESQ. [email protected] 10 KATE JANUKOWICZ, ESQ. 11 [email protected] 12 DANIEL MCGRADY, ESQ. [email protected] 13 - and - 14 15 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 16 125 Broad Street 17 18th Floor 18 New York, New York 10004-2400 19 BY: DROR LADIN, ESQ. [email protected] 20 21 22 23 24 (Continued) 25 TransPerfect Legal Solutions 212-400-8845 - [email protected] ACLU-RDI 6808 p.3 Page 4 1 2 A P P E A R A N C E S: (Continued) 3 4 On Behalf of Defendants: 5 BLANK ROME LLP 6 One Logan Square 7 130 North 18th Street 8 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-6998 9 (215) 569-5791 10 BY: BRIAN S.
    [Show full text]
  • “THE REPORT” Viewer Information and Discussion Guide
    “THE REPORT” Viewer Information and Discussion Guide PAGE 1 ​ TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 2 ​ ​ CHARACTER DETAILS Daniel J. Jones --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 3 Dianne Feinstein ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ page 4 Denis McDonough ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 5 John Owen Brennan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 6 James Elmer Mitchell ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 7 Martin Heinrich --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 7 George Tenet ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 8 Sheldon Whitehouse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- page 9 John A. Rizzo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutional and Political Clash Over Detainees and the Closure of Guantanamo
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW Vol. 74 ● Winter 2012 PRISONERS OF CONGRESS: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL CLASH OVER DETAINEES AND THE CLOSURE OF GUANTANAMO David J.R. Frakt ISSN 0041-9915 (print) 1942-8405 (online) ● DOI 10.5195/lawreview.2012.195 http://lawreview.law.pitt.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This site is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D- Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. PRISONERS OF CONGRESS: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL CLASH OVER DETAINEES AND THE CLOSURE OF GUANTANAMO David J.R. Frakt Table of Contents Prologue ............................................................................................................... 181 I. Introduction ................................................................................................. 183 A. A Brief Constitutional History of Guantanamo ................................... 183 1. The Bush Years (January 2002 to January 2009) ....................... 183 2. The Obama Years (January 2009 to the Present) ........................ 192 a. 2009 ................................................................................... 192 b. 2010 to the Present ............................................................. 199 II. Legislative Restrictions and Their Impact ................................................... 205 A. Restrictions on Transfer and/or Release
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:15-Cv-00286-JLQ Document 175 Filed 05/22/17
    Case 2:15-cv-00286-JLQ Document 175 Filed 05/22/17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SPOKANE SULEIMAN ABDULLAH SALIM, et al., NO. 2: l 5-cv-286-JLQ Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF JOSE RODRIGUEZ VS. JAMES E. MITCHELL and JOHN JESSEN, Defendants. I, Jose Rodriguez, hereby declare under penalty of perjury in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, that the following is true and correct and within my personal knowledge and belief to the best of my recollection, and while I have no specific recollection of all the exhibits, I have no reason to dispute their accuracy or authenticity: A. BACKGROUND 1. I am over the age of 18, have personal know ledge of all facts contained in this declaration, and am competent to testify as a witness to those facts. 2. I began working for the United States Central Intelligence Agency ("CIA") in 1976, shortly after graduating from law school. 3. As of September 11, 2001, I had achieved the rank of SIS 4 within the CIA. This is equivalent to the rank of a three-star general. 4. In the immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001, I served as the CIA's Counterterrorism Center's ("CTC") Chief Operating Officer/Deputy Director. The CTC is a division of the CIA's National Clandestine Service. 5. From May 2002 until November 2004, I served as the Director of the CTC. Case 2:15-cv-00286-JLQ Document 175 Filed 05/22/17 6. From November 2004 until October 2005, I served as the Deputy Director of Operations for the CIA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reader's Library: Hugh Nibley: a Legend in His Own Time
    Journal of Book of Mormon Studies Volume 12 Number 1 Article 14 1-31-2003 A Reader's Library: Hugh Nibley: A Legend in His Own Time Mary Lythgoe Bradford Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Bradford, Mary Lythgoe (2003) "A Reader's Library: Hugh Nibley: A Legend in His Own Time," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies: Vol. 12 : No. 1 , Article 14. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms/vol12/iss1/14 This Departments is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title A Reader’s Library: Hugh Nibley: A Legend in His Own Time Author(s) Mary Lythgoe Bradford Reference Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 12/1 (2003): 108–10, 120. ISSN 1065-9366 (print), 2168-3158 (online) Abstract This review enthusiastically endorses Boyd Petersen’s biography of his father-in-law, Hugh Nibley. Petersen intersperses narrative chapters with thematic ones in Hugh Nibley: A Consecrated Life. A READER’S LIBRARY Mary Lythgoe Bradford Hugh Nibley: A Legend in His as a defender of the faith. I don’t I interviewed him for Dialogue, I Own Time disagree, but like most labels, these was impressed with his purple It is tempting to call Boyd Jay are too simplistic. As Bennion’s running shoes and his satirical Petersen’s book Hugh Nibley: A biographer, however, I noticed yet lovable personality.
    [Show full text]
  • JAMES E. MITCHELL Taken Pursuant to Notice, Was Held at the Law Offices of Blank Rome, 130 N
    Page 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SPOKANE - - - SULEIMAN ABDULLAH : SALIM, MOHOMED AHMED : DOCKET NO. BEN SOUD, OBAID ULLAH : (as personal : 2:15-CV-286-JLQ representative of GUL : RAHMAN), : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : JAMES ELMER MITCHELL : and JOHN "BRUCE" : JESSEN, : : Defendants. : - - - Monday, January 16, 2017 - - - Videotaped deposition of JAMES E. MITCHELL taken pursuant to notice, was held at the law offices of Blank Rome, 130 N. 18th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, beginning at 10:13 AM, on the above date, before Constance S. Kent, a Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. * * * MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES (866) 624-6221 www.MagnaLS.com Page 2 1 A P P E A R A N C E S: 2 GIBBONS, PC BY: LAWRENCE LUSTBERG, ESQUIRE 3 DANIEL McGRADY, ESQUIRE AVRAM D. FREY, ESQUIRE 4 KATE E. JANUKOWICZ, ESQUIRE One Gateway Center 5 Newark, New Jersey 07102 973.596.4731 6 Counsel for Plaintiffs 7 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION BY: STEVEN M. WATT, ESQUIRE 8 DROR LADIN, ESQUIRE 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor 9 New York, New York 10004 212.519.7870 10 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs 11 BLANK ROME, LLP 12 BY: JAMES T. SMITH, ESQUIRE JEFFREY ROSENTHAL, ESQUIRE 13 One Logan Square 18th and Cherry Streets 14 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 215.569.5550 15 [email protected] [email protected] 16 Counsel for Defendants 17 BLANK ROME BY: HENRY F. SCHUELKE, III, ESQUIRE 18 1825 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-5403 19 202.772.5815 [email protected] 20 Counsel for Defendants 21 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 31, No. 3, 2005
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 31 Issue 3 Article 1 2005 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 31, No. 3, 2005 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (2005) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 31, No. 3, 2005," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 31 : Iss. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol31/iss3/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 31, No. 3, 2005 Table of Contents CONTENTS ARTICLES • --The Case for Sidney Rigdon as Author of the Lectures on Faith Noel B. Reynolds, 1 • --Reconstructing the Y-Chromosome of Joseph Smith: Genealogical Applications Ugo A. Perego, Natalie M. Myres, and Scott R. Woodward, 42 • --Lucy's Image: A Recently Discovered Photograph of Lucy Mack Smith Ronald E. Romig and Lachlan Mackay, 61 • --Eyes on "the Whole European World": Mormon Observers of the 1848 Revolutions Craig Livingston, 78 • --Missouri's Failed Compromise: The Creation of Caldwell County for the Mormons Stephen C. LeSueur, 113 • --Artois Hamilton: A Good Man in Carthage? Susan Easton Black, 145 • --One Masterpiece, Four Masters: Reconsidering the Authorship of the Salt Lake Tabernacle Nathan D. Grow, 170 • --The Salt Lake Tabernacle in the Nineteenth Century: A Glimpse of Early Mormonism Ronald W. Walker, 198 • --Kerstina Nilsdotter: A Story of the Swedish Saints Leslie Albrecht Huber, 241 REVIEWS --John Sillito, ed., History's Apprentice: The Diaries of B.
    [Show full text]
  • Husayn V. Mitchell, 938 F.3D 1123, 1137–38 (9Th Cir
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ZAYN AL-ABIDIN MUHAMMAD No. 18-35218 HUSAYN; JOSEPH MARGULIES, Petitioners-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00171- v. JLQ JAMES ELMER MITCHELL; JOHN JESSEN, ORDER Respondents, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor-Appellee. Filed July 20, 2020 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges, and Dean D. Pregerson,* District Judge. Order; Concurrence by Judge Paez; Dissent by Judge Bress * The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. 2 HUSAYN V. UNITED STATES SUMMARY** State Secrets Privilege / Subpoena The panel denied a petition for rehearing en banc on behalf of the court. In its opinion, filed September 18, 2019, the panel majority reversed the district court’s order quashing a subpoena sought by Abu Zubaydah, who is currently held at the U.S. detention facility in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, and his attorney, and dismissing the case in its entirety. The panel agreed with the district court that certain information requested was not privileged because it was not a state secret that would pose an exceptionally grave risk to national security. The panel agreed that the government’s assertion of the state secrets privilege was valid over much of the information requested. The panel concluded, however, that the district court erred in quashing the subpoenas in toto rather than attempting to disentangle nonprivileged from privileged information. The panel remanded for further proceedings. Judge Gould dissented and would affirm the district court. He would defer to the view of then-CIA Director and current Secretary of State Michael Pompeo that the disclosure of secret information in this proceeding “reasonably could be expected to cause serious, and in many instances, exceptionally grave damage to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors
    CONTRIBUTORS Ross C. ANDERSON, former Democratic congressional nominee for Utah, is a Salt Lake City, Utah, trial lawyer and community activist. He has served as a volunteer with Common Cause of Utah, Planned Parenthood Association of Utah, American Civil Liberties Union, Guadalupe Schools, Corrections Education Advisory Council, and Citizens for Penal Reform. R. A CHRISTMAS'S poems have appeared in The Southern Review, Western Humanities Review, Sunstone, and elsewhere. He lives and works in Utah County. MERRILL COOK currently represents Utah's Second Congressional District. BRIAN EVENSON teaches creative writing at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater and is the author of Altmann 's Tongue. His new novel, Father of Lies, is forthcoming. STANTON HARRIS HALL lives in Seattle, Washington. DAVID KNOWLTON, author of numerous articles on Mormonism, is an an- thropologist and independent scholar. He lives in Salt Lake City, Utah. ADDIE LACOE is an Ada Comstock Scholar at Smith College, Northamp- ton, Massachusetts. ROGER D. LAUNIUS, chief historian for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in Washington, D.C., is the author of Joseph Smith III: Pragmatic Prophet. He lives in Crofton, Maryland. JOHN P. MEIER is Professor of New Testament in the Department of Bibli- cal Studies, Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. He re- ceived his License (Master's) in theology at the Gregorian University in Rome and his doctorate in sacred scriptures at the Biblical Institute in Rome. He is the author of numerous articles and books, including vol- umes one and two of a trilogy on the historical Jesus entitled A Marginal Jew. CASUALENE MEYER received an M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manipulation of Public Health for Non-Public Health Purposes and Its Legal Consequences
    FIRST DO NO HARM: THE MANIPULATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH FOR NON-PUBLIC HEALTH PURPOSES AND ITS LEGAL CONSEQUENCES CHRISTOPHER OGOLLA* I. INTRODUCTION The well-known aphorism “first do no harm” (primum non nocere), used in many medical schools today and attributed to the Hippocratic oath, serves as a guide to “doctors in caring for their patients.”1 Although the oath has been described as individualistic,2 the aphorism holds equal if not a weightier value in public health practice.3 At its core, public health is concerned with promoting and protecting the health of populations.4 However, public health has often times been used to subvert the very same goals it is designed to achieve. This is what this Article refers to as using public health for non-public health purposes. The results can be, and often are, harmful to the practice. This Article will focus on three examples to illuminate the risks of using public health for non-public health purposes; namely, the anti-abortion legislation,5 the 2014 Ebola virus disease outbreak, and the 2010 Patient * Associate Professor of Law, Savannah Law School, 516 Drayton Street, Savannah, GA 31401. The author worked at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta as an Association of Schools of Public Health (ASPH) research fellow. Additionally, he served as a public health representative for the New York State Department of Health, Division of TB Control, in New Rochelle, New York. This Article benefited greatly from the helpful suggestions and comments of Professor Darnell Weeden, Thurgood Marshall School of Law, Texas Southern University, who served as the main reviewer during the 2016 Southeast/Southwest People of Color Legal Scholarship Conference held February 25-28 in Orlando, Florida.
    [Show full text]