O:\USERS\ESTARIEL\DOCS\Panel Graphics\Hearing Session

$O:\USERS\ESTARIEL\DOCS\Panel Graphics\Hearing Session$

Hearing Session Order & Amendments

January 25, 2018 Case MDL No. 2795 Document 100 Filed 01/02/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: CENTURYLINK RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER BILLING DISPUTES LITIGATION Inter-Marketing Group, USA, Inc. v. Centurylink, Inc., et al., ) W.D. Louisiana, C.A. No. 3:17-01648 ) MDL No. 2795 (Formerly S.D. New York, C.A. No. 1:17-08234) )

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED DECEMBER 15, 2017 AND ORDER AMENDING CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER

This action (Inter-Marketing Group, USA, Inc.,), bearing the Southern District of New York civil action number of 1:17-08234, was included on the Panel’s conditional transfer order (“CTO-3") filed on November 6, 2017. Plaintiff in Inter-Marketing Group, USA, Inc., filed a notice of opposition to the transfer. Plaintiff later filed a motion and brief to vacate the CTO. The matter is scheduled to be heard at the Panel's January 25, 2018, hearing in Miami, Florida.

The Panel has now been advised that this action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of Louisiana pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), by the Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan in an order filed on December 13, 2017. Coincident to this transfer, Inter- Marketing Group, USA, Inc., was assigned a new Western District of Louisiana civil action number of 3:17-01648.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Panel’s conditional transfer order designated as “CTO-3" filed on November 6, 2017, is AMENDED to reflect the new Western District of Louisiana civil action number of 3:17-01648.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all documents filed with the Panel's CM/ECF system under C.A. No. 1:17-08234 will be re-designated as C.A. No. 3:17-01648.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Order and Schedule filed on December 15, 2017, is likewise amended to reflect the new Western District of Louisiana civil action number of 3:17-01648.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 28

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

NOTICE OF HEARING SESSION

Pursuant to the order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed today, notice is hereby given that a hearing session has been scheduled to consider various matters under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

DATE OF HEARING SESSION: January 25, 2018

LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse Ceremonial Courtroom 13-3, 13th Floor 400 North Miami Avenue Miami, Florida 33128

TIME OF HEARING SESSION: In those matters designated for oral argument, counsel presenting oral argument must be present at 8:00 a.m. in order for the Panel to allocate the amount of time for oral argument. Oral argument will commence at 9:30 a.m.

SCHEDULED MATTERS: Matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session are listed on the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session.

• Section A of this Schedule lists the matters designated for oral argument and includes all actions encompassed by Motion(s) for transfer filed pursuant to Rules 6.1 and 6.2. Any party waiving oral argument pursuant to Rule 11.1(d) need not attend the Hearing Session. • Section B of this Schedule lists the matters that the Panel has determined to consider without oral argument, pursuant to Rule 11.1(c). Parties and counsel involved in these matters need not attend the Hearing Session.

ORAL ARGUMENT: • The Panel carefully considers the positions advocated in filings with the Panel when it allocates time to attorneys presenting oral argument. The Panel, therefore, expects attorneys to adhere to those positions including those concerning an appropriate transferee district. Any change in position should be conveyed to Panel staff before the beginning of oral argument. Where an attorney thereafter advocates a position different from that conveyed to Panel staff, the Panel may reduce the allotted argument time and decline to hear further from that attorney. Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 28

- 2 -

• The Panel expects attorneys presenting oral argument to be prepared to discuss what steps they have taken to pursue alternatives to centralization including, but not limited to, engaging in informal coordination of discovery and scheduling, and seeking Section 1404 transfer of one or more of the subject cases.

For those matters listed on Section A of the Schedule, the "Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument" must be filed in this office no later than January 8, 2018. The procedures governing Panel oral argument (Panel Rule 11.1) are attached. The Panel strictly adheres to these procedures.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel cc: Clerk, United States District for the Southern District of Florida Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 3 of 28

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

HEARING SESSION ORDER

The Panel issues the following orders in connection with its next hearing session,

IT IS ORDERED that on January 25, 2018, the Panel will convene a hearing session in Miami, Florida, to consider the matters on the attached Schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel may, on its own initiative, consider transfer of any or all of the actions in those matters to any district or districts.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel will hear oral argument on the matters listed on Section A of the attached Schedule, unless the parties waive oral argument or unless the Panel later decides to dispense with oral argument pursuant to Panel Rule 11.1(c).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel will consider without oral argument the matters listed on Section B of the attached Schedule pursuant to Panel Rule 11.1(c). The Panel reserves the prerogative, on any basis including submissions of parties pursuant to Panel Rule 11.1(b), to designate any of those matters for oral argument.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation shall direct notice of this hearing session to counsel for all parties involved in the matters on the attached Schedule.

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

______Sarah S. Vance Chair

Marjorie O. Rendell Charles R. Breyer Lewis A. Kaplan Ellen Segal Huvelle R. David Proctor Catherine D. Perry Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 4 of 28

SCHEDULE OF MATTERS FOR HEARING SESSION January 25, 2018 !! Miami, Florida

SECTION A MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

(This schedule contains only those civil actions listed in the Schedule(s) of Actions submitted with the docketed motion(s) for transfer. See Panel Rules 6.1 and 6.2. In the event these dockets are centralized, other actions of which the Panel has been informed may be subject to transfer pursuant to Panel Rule 7.1.)

MDL No. 2809 ! IN RE: ONGLYZA (SAXAGLIPTIN) AND KOMBIGLYZE XR (SAXAGLIPTIN AND METFORMIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Carolyn Williams to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Middle District of Alabama

VALLENTINE v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00265

Northern District of Alabama

PEOPLES v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!00101

District of Arizona

SETTLE v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01269

Northern District of California

WILLIAMS, ET AL. v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16!07152 MARTIN v. BRISTOL!MYERS COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00661

Northern District of Georgia

REID v. BRISTOL!MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01503 TURNER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!02782 YORK v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!02915 JOHNSON v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!02916 Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 5 of 28

District of Idaho

CHRISTENSEN v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00321

Northern District of Indiana

MILLER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00330

Southern District of Indiana

COUSINS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!02607

Eastern District of Kentucky

BARNES v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00124 TAYLOR, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:16!00260

Western District of Kentucky

TUCKER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00268

Eastern District of Louisiana

ROSS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00443 LESTER SPEIGHTS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07884

Middle District of Louisiana

BROWN v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00039

Western District of Louisiana

LETELL v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00553

District of New Jersey

YOUNG v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00347 REEVES, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03024

-2- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 6 of 28

MITCHELL v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03026 BINNS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03028 TALTON v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03029 MCAFEE v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03030 GREEN v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03032 ISHMAN v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03033 ATKINS, SR. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03034 DAY v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03035 ASENCIO v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03036 SECHLER, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03037

Eastern District of New York

CORTINA v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!03912

Middle District of North Carolina

HOLLAND v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00710

Southern District of Ohio

CARPENTER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00262

Eastern District of Oklahoma

HULBERT v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!00327

District of South Carolina

DUBOSE v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!01695

Eastern District of Tennessee

CAMPBELL v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00219

-3- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 7 of 28

Middle District of Tennessee

WILCOX v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01202

Eastern District of Texas

WARE v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00111

Northern District of Texas

BOLLER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00050

Southern District of Texas

DAVILA v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00145 CHESTER v. BRISTOL!MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00316

MDL No. 2810 ! IN RE: SIX FLAGS FAIR AND ACCURATE CREDIT TRANSACTIONS ACT (FACTA) LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, Great America LLC, d/b/a Six Flags Great America and Six Flags Hurricane Harbor, and Magic Mountain LLC to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

Central District of California

MIRANDA, ET AL. v. MAGIC MOUNTAIN LLC, C.A. No. 2:17!07483

Northern District of Georgia

BAILEY v. SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORP., C.A. No. 1:17!03336

Northern District of Illinois

SOTO, ET AL. v. GREAT AMERICA LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!06902

-4- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 8 of 28

MDL No. 2811 ! IN RE: DOMETIC CORPORATION GAS ABSORPTION REFRIGERATOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Catherine Papasan, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Central District of California

ZIMMER, ET AL. v. DOMETIC CORPORATION, C.A. No. 2:17!06913

Northern District of California

PAPASAN, ET AL. v. DOMETIC CORPORATION, C.A. No. 4:16!02117

Southern District of Florida

VARNER, ET AL. v. DOMETIC CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:16!22482 ZUCCONI, ET AL. v. DOMETIC CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:17!23197

MDL No. 2812 ! IN RE: CUSTOMIZED PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Laura Braley to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas:

District of Oregon

KJESSLER v. ZAAPPAAZ, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01361

Southern District of Texas

BRALEY v. AHMED, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!03064

-5- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 9 of 28

MDL No. 2813 ! IN RE: DENTAL SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Benco Dental Supply Company and Patterson Companies, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York:

Eastern District of New York

COMFORT CARE FAMILY DENTAL, P.C., ET AL. v. HENRY SCHEIN, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00282 ROBERT W. GRODNER, DDS v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00345 BAUER DENTAL ARTS v. HENRY SCHEIN, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00355 DR. ROBERT CORWIN, DDS v. BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00442 KEITH SCHWARTZ, D.M.D., P.A. v. BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00443 DR. STEPHEN M. GRUSSMARK, DDS v. BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00479 DRESNIN v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00497 HOWARD M. MAY, DDS, PC v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00548 BEMUS POINT DENTAL, LLC v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00560 KOTTEMANN ORTHODONTICS, P.L.L.C. v. BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00576 NAGHMEH YADEGAR, D.D.S., INC. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00591 EVOLUTION DENTAL SCIENCE, LLC v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00596 NELSON v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00609 PECK v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00616 PETER BENCE, DMD, P.A. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00631 KANELLOS & KOTIS v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00657 OMID FARAHMAND DMD, INC. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00661 PJCC DENTAL PC v. HENRY SCHEIN, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00662 WEST LA DENTAL HEALTH CARE CENTER v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00666

-6- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 10 of 28

ANTHONY J. PEPPY DDS & SAMUEL J. PEPPY JR., DDS PC v. BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00691 SHAYSTEHFAR v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00692 IN RE DENTAL SUPPLIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION, C.A. No. 1:16!00696 RITTENHOUSE SMILES, P.C. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00762 THOMAS CASPERS, D.D.S., P.S., ET AL. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00765 WHITE v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00945 GREENBERG v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!01280 CORNERSTONE DENTISTRY, P.C. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!01333 SOURCEONE DENTAL, INC. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:15!05440 BERMUDEZ v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!00570 INDIANOLA FAMILY DENTISTRY, P.L.C. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!00658 STYGER, DDS v. BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!00712 DENNIS M. WINTER, D.D.S., P.C., ET AL. v. PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!00751 JOHNNIDIS v. BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!00906 WOLGIN v. BENCO DENTAL SUPPLY CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!01020 SCOTT T. OZAKI DDS INC. v. HENRY SCHEIN, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!01377 IQ DENTAL SUPPLY, INC. v. HENRY SCHEIN, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!04834

Eastern District of Texas

ARCHER AND WHITE SALES, INC. v. HENRY SCHEIN, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!00572

MDL No. 2814 ! IN RE: FORD MOTOR CO. DPS6 POWERSHIFT TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Ford Motor Company to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Central District of California:

Central District of California

HIBDON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!06355 ALONSO v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!06622 FORT v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!06631 BAGWELL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!06632

-7- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 11 of 28

BARRALES v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!06638 GIBSON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!06644 HERMOSILLO v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!06651 MAGANA, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!06653 MEJIA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!06654 PEDANTE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!06656 RULE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07204 PADILLA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07236 HOGGE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07256 GOMEZ v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!07262 CRESPO v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07297 HIATT v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!07321 TRUJILLO, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!07322 ALTAMIRANO!TORRES v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07338 ALTIKRITI, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07369 DOBIAS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07370 CASTANEDA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07416 SULLIVAN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07497 EMHARDT v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07533 MOBLEY v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07554 WRIGHT, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!01982 PAPAMICHAEL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!01986 RODRIGUEZ, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02007 PADILLA, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02015 WEST v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02018 BERRY, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02034 HENRY, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02036 PEREZ, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02042 KEATING v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02044 HERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02045 MCGINNIS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!02047

Eastern District of California

ZIMMERSCHIED, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:17!01317 SORENSON, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!01987 WILLIAMS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02006 MALAGON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02051 VILLALOVOS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02053 BARRACK v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02078 LOVEST v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02079 CAMARGO v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02092

-8- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 12 of 28

MARQUEZ v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02140 GLASSFORD v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02145 RERICH v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02147 DOLAN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02148 REYES v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02151 NACUA, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02153 MARTIN, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!02158

Northern District of California

THEADE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:17!05643 SCHATZMAN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:17!05669 BRIGGS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:17!05762 BECKER, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:17!05765 HYDE, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05613 SERVANTES, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05615 THOMAS, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05619 MENDEZ, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05620 MARLOWE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05621 TORRES v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05694 ACEVES v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05695 FORRESTER v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05698 TORRES, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05699 RODRIGUEZ!DIAZ v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05701 RODGERS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05703 HERNANDEZ v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05704 SIMMONS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05705 INDIVERI v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05706 GARCIA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05711 CONNAUGHTON, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05712 KLEIN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05722 MAGAN, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05730 KANE, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05745 MARTINEZ v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05746 PADILLA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05747 PAYSENO v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05749 RAVEN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05750 RIVERA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05751 GONZALEZ v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05885 REINPRECHT v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05900 TAVITIAN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05915 ARCHIBALD, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05922

-9- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 13 of 28

DILLARD, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05924 ESTRADA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05925 AGUILAR v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05927 ALLIANO v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05978 HESS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!05996 ROMERO, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!06022

Southern District of California

MILES, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01993 ROJAS, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02005 RALEIGH v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02035 CARDOSO v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02037 ROSE, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02038 MINKE, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02039 KENNEDY v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02040 STANTON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02043 MODROW v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02044 ROCHE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02045 REECE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02046 MENDOZA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02047 SALGADO, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02048 OMARK v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02049 MUHAMMAD v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02050 SMITHFIELD, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02109 PORTER, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02111 FUKASAWA, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02116 BILLIARD v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02121 ESQUIBEL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02157

District of Hawaii

HEMZA v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00296

Southern District of Ohio

MARTIN, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:16!00855

Eastern District of Texas

ASCENSIO, ET AL. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, C.A. No. 4:17!00074

-10- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 14 of 28

MDL No. 2815 ! IN RE: CORVETTE Z06 MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Michael Vazquez, et al.; Peter Jankovskis, et al.; Michael Jasper, et al.; and Joseph Minarik to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Northern District of California

JASPER, ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, C.A. No. 5:17!06284

Southern District of Florida

VAZQUEZ, ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!22209

Northern District of Illinois

JANKOVSKIS, ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!07822

Western District of Washington

MINARIK v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, C.A. No. 2:17!01615

MDL No. 2816 ! IN RE: SORIN 3T HEATER!COOLER SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. II)

Motion of defendants Sorin Group USA, Inc.; Sorin Group Deutschland GmbH; and LivaNova PLC to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:

Northern District of Alabama

GOREE v. SORIN GROUP USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01427

Central District of California

GREEN, ET AL. v. CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07341 GARVER, ET AL. v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND, GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07802

-11- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 15 of 28

District of Colorado

SYKES, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!02437

Middle District of Florida

DEZENSKI, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00323 POOLE v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 8:17!02568

Southern District of Florida

RAMIREZ v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:17!61455

Northern District of Georgia

SHEELY, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00124

Northern District of Illinois

KMAK, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!04759

Southern District of Indiana

ABPLANALP v. SORIN GROUP USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01916

Northern District of Iowa

SMITH v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03058 SAWVEL v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!02056

Southern District of Iowa

CRAWFORD v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16!00103 REED, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00063 PRESCOTT v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:16!00472 PICKRELL v. SORIN GROUP USA, INC., C.A. No. 4:17!00191 ADAMS v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, C.A. No. 4:17!00237 JENKINS, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00324

-12- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 16 of 28

THOMAS, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00360

Western District of Kentucky

STEWART, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00644

Eastern District of Michigan

KUHNMUENCH, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!11719

District of Minnesota

BRACKENBURY v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:17!04186

Eastern District of New York

DIAZ v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!06026

Northern District of New York

SUSCO v. LIVANOVA P.L.C., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!01164

Eastern District of North Carolina

COLSON, ET AL. v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!00519

Western District of North Carolina

BLEVINS v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16!00785

Middle District of Pennsylvania

WHIPKEY, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01233 HERSHEY, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01768

-13- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 17 of 28

District of South Carolina

WEINACKER v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:16!02286 FOWLER, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:16!02307 BAGWELL, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:16!02308 MATTISON v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:16!03128 THOMASON, ET AL. v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:16!03129 JOHNSON v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:16!03130 SMITH v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:16!03131 GILSTRAP, ET AL. v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:16!03132 WADDELL v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!01060 WEST, ET AL. v. LIVANOVA PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 8:16!02688

District of South Dakota

EISENBERG, ET AL. v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:16!04175 FAETH v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!04049

Eastern District of Tennessee

CANTRELL, ET AL. v. SORIN GROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00186

MDL No. 2817 ! IN RE: DEALER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of defendants CDK Global, LLC; CDK Global, Inc.; The Reynolds and Reynolds Company; and Computerized Vehicle Registration to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

Central District of California

MOTOR VEHICLE SOFTWARE CORPORATION v. CDK GLOBAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00896

-14- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 18 of 28

Northern District of Illinois

HARTLEY BUICK GMC TRUCK, INC. v. CDK GLOBAL, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!07827

Southern District of Mississippi

JOHN O'NEIL JOHNSON TOYOTA, LLC v. CDK GLOBAL, LLC, C.A. No. 3:17!00888

District of New Jersey

TETERBORO AUTOMALL, INC. v. CDK GLOBAL, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!08714

Western District of Wisconsin

AUTHENTICOM, INC. v. CDK GLOBAL, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00318

MDL No. 2818 ! IN RE: GENERAL MOTORS AIR CONDITIONING MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

Motion of defendants General Motors Company, General Motors Holdings LLC, and General Motors LLC to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan:

Northern District of California

JENKINS, ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:17!05864

Eastern District of Michigan

TANGARA, ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, C.A. No. 4:17!12786

Eastern District of New York

WON v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!04819

Northern District of Texas

BELL, ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!00183

-15- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 19 of 28

MDL No. 2819 ! IN RE: RESTASIS (CYCLOSPORINE OPHTHALMIC EMULSION) ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan, and 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York:

Eastern District of New York

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN v. ALLERGAN, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!06684 1199SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND, ET AL. v. ALLERGAN, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!06755

Eastern District of Texas

FWK HOLDINGS, LLC v. ALLERGAN, INC., C.A. No. 2:17!00747

MDL No. 2820 ! IN RE: DICAMBA HERBICIDES LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Brian Warren, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois:

Eastern District of Arkansas

WHITEHEAD FARMS, ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00168 BRUCE FARMS PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00154

Southern District of Illinois

WARREN, ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00973

District of Kansas

CLAASSEN, ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!01210

-16- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 20 of 28

Eastern District of Missouri

BADER FARMS, INC., ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:16!00299 LANDERS, ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:17!00020 SMOKEY ALLEY FARM PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!02031 COW!MIL FARMS, INC. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 4:17!02386

Western District of Missouri

HARRIS v. MONSANTO COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!05262

MDL No. 2821 ! IN RE: BEHR DECKOVER MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Joan Edwards and Linne Rose to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Central District of California:

Central District of California

IN RE BEHR PROCESS CORP., C.A. No. 8:17!01016

Eastern District of California

HAMILTON v. BEHR PROCESS CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01765

Middle District of Florida

HAMIL, ET AL. v. BEHR PROCESS CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!02058

Northern District of Illinois

BISHOP, ET AL. v. BEHR PROCESS CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!04464

District of New Jersey

BROCK v. BEHR PROCESS CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!12341

Eastern District of New York

COLE, ET AL. v. BEHR PROCESS CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!05052

-17- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 21 of 28

Western District of North Carolina

EDWARDS v. BEHR PROCESS CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00683

District of Oregon

LEIKER v. BEHR PROCESS CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01909

Western District of Washington

ROSE v. BEHR PROCESS CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01754

-18- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 22 of 28

SECTION B MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR CONSIDERATION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2179 ! IN RE: OIL SPILL BY THE OIL RIG "DEEPWATER HORIZON" IN THE GULF OF MEXICO, ON APRIL 20, 2010

Oppositions of plaintiff Shane Bruce and defendants Stephen Teague, M.D.; Mark Rasnake, M.D.; University Infectious Disease; Lori Staudenmaier, D.O.; UT Family Physicians LaFollette; Gregory A. Finch, P.A.; Campbell County HMA, LLC d/b/a Tennova LaFollette Medical Center Clinic; Campbell County HMA, LLC d/b/a Tennova Healthcare LaFollette Medical Center; Knoxville HMA Physician Management, LLC d/b/a Tennova Cardiology Services; Christian Terzian, M.D.; and Jeffrey Nitz P.A. to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana:

Eastern District of Tennessee

BRUCE v. GREAT BRITAIN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00285

MDL No. 2295 ! IN RE: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA) LITIGATION

Motions of defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California:

Middle District of Florida

HYNES v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 8:17!02176 ANCONA v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, INC., C.A. No. 8:17!02396

Northern District of Illinois

ARORA v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!06851

-19- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 23 of 28

MDL No. 2323 ! IN RE: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS' CONCUSSION INJURY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Shayanna Jenkins Hernandez to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania:

District of Massachusetts

HERNANDEZ v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!12244

MDL No. 2327 ! IN RE: ETHICON, INC., PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Margo Karn, et al., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia:

Central District of California

KARN, ET AL. v. CALDERA MEDICAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07515

MDL No. 2543 ! IN RE: GENERAL MOTORS LLC IGNITION SWITCH LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Megan Hancock, et al., and Kenneth Myers to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

Southern District of Ohio

HANCOCK, ET AL. v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC DBA GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY DBA GENERAL MOTORS, C.A. No. 3:17!00309

Northern District of West Virginia

MYERS v. GENERAL MOTORS, C.A. No. 3:17!00122

-20- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 24 of 28

MDL No. 2557 ! IN RE: AUTO BODY SHOP ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motions of defendants State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company; Allstate Insurance Company; Encompass Home and Auto Insurance Co.; Esurance Insurance Company; Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; Safeco Insurance Company of America; State Auto Mutual Insurance Company; USAA Casualty Insurance Company; The Cincinnati Insurance Company; Nationwide General Insurance Company; 21st Century Insurance Company Farmers Insurance Exchange; and Kemper Independence Insurance Company to transfer their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida:

Western District of Pennsylvania

PROFESSIONAL, INC. v. FIRST CHOICE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00170 PROFESSIONAL, INC. v. KEMPER INDEPENDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:17!00176

MDL No. 2599 ! IN RE: TAKATA AIRBAG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Lynda Flores to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Central District of California

FLORES v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!08334

MDL No. 2709 ! IN RE: DOLLAR GENERAL CORP. MOTOR OIL MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff State of Mississippi to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri:

Southern District of Mississippi

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00801

-21- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 25 of 28

MDL No. 2738 ! IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Dawn Hannah and Any Johnson, et al., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey:

Eastern District of Missouri

HANNAH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!02647 JOHNSON, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!02651

MDL No. 2754 ! IN RE: ELIQUIS (APIXABAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

District of Delaware

MELZER, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01094 FEGLEY, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01095 CARTER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01505 HAWKINS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01506 BOOKER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01507 MARKS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01508 VOWELL v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01509 LEONARD v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01510 THOMAS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01533 SMITH v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01556 HOLBROOKS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01557 HALL v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01558 DAVIS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01559 WELLINGTON v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01560 SMITH v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01561 SHOWERS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01562

-22- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 26 of 28

LITTLEFIELD v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01563 CUTSINGER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01564 LOMBARDO v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01565 MILLER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01566 MCDOUGLE v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01567 CARR v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01568

MDL No. 2768 ! IN RE: STRYKER LFIT V40 FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Ronald Cote and Phillippe J. Bolduc to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts:

District of Rhode Island

COTE v. STRYKER CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00311 BOLDUC v. STRYKER CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00429

MDL No. 2775 ! IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Ronald L. Cox, et al., and defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland:

Northern District of Georgia

COX, ET AL. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!03047

Southern District of Ohio

FISHER v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!00347

-23- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 27 of 28

MDL No. 2795 ! IN RE: CENTURYLINK RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER BILLING DISPUTES LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiff Inter-Marketing Group USA, Inc., and defendants CenturyLink, Inc.; Glen F. Post III; R. Stewart Ewing, Jr.; and David D. Cole to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota:

Western District of Louisiana

CRAIG v. CENTURYLINK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01005 SCOTT v. CENTURYLINK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01033 THUMMETI v. CENTURYLINK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01065

Southern District of New York

INTER!MARKETING GROUP USA, INC. v. CENTURYLINK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!08234

MDL No. 2804 ! IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Linda Hughes and City of Seattle and defendants KVK-Tech, Inc.; Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC; Impax Laboratories, Inc.; and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio:

Eastern District of Missouri

HUGHES v. MALLINCKRODT BRAND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!02426

Western District of Washington

CITY OF SEATTLE v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01577

-24- Case MDL No. 2179 Document 1979 Filed 12/15/17 Page 28 of 28

RULE 11.1: HEARING SESSIONS AND ORAL ARGUMENT

(a) Schedule. The Panel shall schedule sessions for oral argument and consideration of other matters as desirable or necessary. The Chair shall determine the time, place and agenda for each hearing session. The Clerk of the Panel shall give appropriate notice to counsel for all parties. The Panel may continue its consideration of any scheduled matters.

(b) Oral Argument Statement. Any party affected by a motion may file a separate statement setting forth reasons why oral argument should, or need not, be heard. Such statements shall be captioned “Reasons Why Oral Argument Should [Need Not] Be Heard” and shall be limited to 2 pages.

(i) The parties affected by a motion to transfer may agree to waive oral argument. The Panel will take this into consideration in determining the need for oral argument.

(c) Hearing Session. The Panel shall not consider transfer or remand of any action pending in a federal district court when any party timely opposes such transfer or remand without first holding a hearing session for the presentation of oral argument. The Panel may dispense with oral argument if it determines that:

(i) the dispositive issue(s) have been authoritatively decided; or (ii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

Unless otherwise ordered, the Panel shall consider all other matters, such as a motion for reconsideration, upon the basis of the pleadings.

(d) Notification of Oral Argument. The Panel shall promptly notify counsel of those matters in which oral argument is scheduled, as well as those matters that the Panel will consider on the pleadings. The Clerk of the Panel shall require counsel to file and serve notice of their intent to either make or waive oral argument. Failure to do so shall be deemed a waiver of oral argument. If counsel does not attend oral argument, the matter shall not be rescheduled and that party’s position shall be treated as submitted for decision on the basis of the pleadings filed.

(i) Absent Panel approval and for good cause shown, only those parties to actions who have filed a motion or written response to a motion or order shall be permitted to present oral argument. (ii) The Panel will not receive oral testimony except upon notice, motion and an order expressly providing for it.

(e) Duty to Confer. Counsel in an action set for oral argument shall confer separately prior to that argument for the purpose of organizing their arguments and selecting representatives to present all views without duplication. Oral argument is a means for counsel to emphasize the key points of their arguments, and to update the Panel on any events since the conclusion of briefing.

(f) Time Limit for Oral Argument. Barring exceptional circumstances, the Panel shall allot a maximum of 20 minutes for oral argument in each matter. The time shall be divided among those with varying viewpoints. Counsel for the moving party or parties shall generally be heard first. Hearing Session Order & Amendments

March 29, 2018 Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

NOTICE OF HEARING SESSION

DATE OF HEARING SESSION: March 29, 2018

LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: Richard B. Russell Federal Building and United States Courthouse Ceremonial Courtroom, 23rd Floor 75 Ted Turner Drive S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303

SCHEDULED MATTERS: Matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session are listed on the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session.

- 2 -

For those matters listed on Section A of the Schedule, the "Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument" must be filed in this office no later than March 12, 2018. The procedures governing Panel oral argument (Panel Rule 11.1) are attached. The Panel strictly adheres to these procedures.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel cc: Clerk, United States District for the Northern District of Georgia Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 3 of 20

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

HEARING SESSION ORDER

The Panel issues the following orders in connection with its next hearing session,

IT IS ORDERED that on March 29, 2018, the Panel will convene a hearing session in Atlanta, Georgia, to consider the matters on the attached Schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel may, on its own initiative, consider transfer of any or all of the actions in those matters to any district or districts.

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

______Sarah S. Vance Chair

Marjorie O. Rendell Charles R. Breyer Lewis A. Kaplan Ellen Segal Huvelle R. David Proctor Catherine D. Perry Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 4 of 20

SCHEDULE OF MATTERS FOR HEARING SESSION March 29, 2018 !! Atlanta, Georgia

SECTION A MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2822 ! IN RE: FIRST DATABANK PRESCRIPTION INFORMATION LITIGATION

Motion of defendant First Databank, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of California

EXELTIS USA, INC. v. FIRST DATABANK, INC., C.A. No. 4:17!04810

Northern District of Georgia

ACELLA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. FIRST DATABANK, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!05013

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

WOMEN'S CHOICE PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. FIRST DATABANK, INC., C.A. No. 2:17!03725

MDL No. 2824 ! IN RE: GOLD KING MINE RELEASE IN SAN JUAN COUNTY, COLORADO, ON AUGUST 5, 2015

Motion of defendant Environmental Restoration, LLC, to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico:

District of New Mexico

STATE OF NEW MEXICO v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, C.A. No. 1:16!00465 NAVAJO NATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!00931 MCDANIEL, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00710 Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 5 of 20

District of Utah

STATE OF UTAH, THE v. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00866

MDL No. 2825 ! IN RE: ALTERYX, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff David Kacur to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Central District of California:

Central District of California

KACUR v. ALTERYX, INC., C.A. No. 8:17!02222

District of Nevada

FOSKARIS v. ALTERYX, INC., C.A. No. 2:17!03088

District of Oregon

JACKSON v. ALTERYX, INC., C.A. No. 3:17!02021

MDL No. 2826 ! IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Steven Agans, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of Alabama

GRICE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., C.A. No. 5:17!01975

Central District of California

FLORES v. RASIER, LLC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!08503 HELLER, ET AL. v. RASIER, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!08545

Northern District of California

WEBBER, ET AL. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!06758

-2- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 6 of 20

AGANS, ET AL. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., C.A. No. 3:17!06759 BURNETT, ET AL. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., C.A. No. 4:17!06835

Northern District of Illinois

HARANG, ET AL. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!08500 FRANKLIN, ET AL. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., C.A. No.1:17!08510 WEST v. UBER USA, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!08593 PATNI, ET AL. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!08709

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

DESIGNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!05289

MDL No. 2827 ! IN RE: APPLE INC. DEVICE PERFORMANCE LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Nicole Gallmann to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Central District of California

BOGDANOVICH, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!09138 MAILYAN v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 2:17!09192

Northern District of California

HARVEY v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 5:17!07274 GALLMANN v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 5:17!07285 HAKIMI v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 5:17!07292 BATISTA, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 5:17!07355

Southern District of California

COOK v. APPLE INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02579

Southern District of Florida

ABUROS v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!24712

Northern District of Illinois

MANGANO, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!09178 NEILAN v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!09296

-3- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 7 of 20

Southern District of Indiana

SCHROEDER v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!04750

Eastern District of Louisiana

LANASA v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 2:17!17878

Southern District of Mississippi

MCINNIS, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!00358

Western District of Missouri

BURTON, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 2:17!04257

Eastern District of New York

DRANTIVY v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!07480 LAZARUS, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!07485

Southern District of New York

RABINOVITS, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!10032

District of South Carolina

BRAND, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 2:17!03453

Eastern District of Texas

MILLER, ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 4:17!00889

MDL No. 2828 ! IN RE: INTEL CORP. CPU MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Stephen Garcia, et al., and Richard Reis, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of California

GARCIA, ET AL. v. INTEL CORPORATION, C.A. No. 5:18!00046 REIS, ET AL. v. INTEL CORPORATION, C.A. No. 5:18!00074

-4- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 8 of 20

Southern District of Indiana

JONES v. INTEL CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:18!00029

Eastern District of New York

STERN v. INTEL CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:18!00065

District of Oregon

MANN v. INTEL CORPORATION, C.A. No. 6:18!00028

MDL No. 2829 ! IN RE: MT. GOX BITCOIN EXCHANGE LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Anthony Motto to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

Central District of California

LACK v. MIZUHO BANK, LTD., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00617

Northern District of Illinois

GREENE, ET AL. v. MTGOX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14!01437

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

PEARCE v. MIZUHO BANK, LTD., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00306

MDL No. 2830 ! IN RE: UNILOC USA, INC., AND UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A., HPE PORTFOLIO PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Uniloc USA, Inc., et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas:

Northern District of California

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. LOGITECH, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!06733 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 3:18!00358 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 3:18!00360 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 3:18!00363 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 3:18!00572

-5- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 9 of 20

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 4:18!00359 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 4:18!00365

District of Delaware

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!01526 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!01527 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. PEEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!01552 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. WINK LABS, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!01656 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!01657 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!01658

Southern District of Indiana

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. EXCLUSIVE GROUP LLC, C.A. No. 1:17!03962

Eastern District of Texas

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00707 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00714 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00722

Northern District of Texas

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00825 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00826 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00827 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00828 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00858

Western District of Washington

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. HTC AMERICA, INC., C.A. No. 2:17!01558 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. HTC AMERICA, INC., C.A. No. 2:17!01561 UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL. v. HTC AMERICA, INC., C.A. No. 2:17!01562

-6- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 10 of 20

MDL No. 2831 ! IN RE: AM RETAIL GROUP, INC., FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA) AND WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION

Motion of defendant AM Retail Group, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California:

Eastern District of California

WATKINS, ET AL. v. AM RETAIL GROUP, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!01287

Northern District of California

SANCHEZ v. AM RETAIL GROUP, INC., C.A. No. 3:18!00287

MDL No. 2832 ! IN RE: LIQUID TOPPINGS DISPENSING SYSTEM ('447) PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Guillermo Canedo and Icetastic Enterprises, LLC, to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

District of Arizona

KONA ICE, INC. v. MESSIER, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!03298

District of Colorado

KONA ICE, INC. v. LIU, C.A. No. 1:17!02301 KONA ICE, INC. v. SILVA!ROMERO, C.A. No. 1:17!02302

Northern District of Florida

KONA ICE, INC. v. BAILEY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00698

Southern District of Florida

KONA ICE, INC. v. CANEDO, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:17!61842 TIKIZ FRANCHISING, LLC, ET AL. v. KONA ICE, INC., C.A. No. 0:18!60237

Western District of Louisiana

KONA ICE, INC. v. NAVARRE, C.A. No. 2:17!01208

-7- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 11 of 20

District of Maryland

KONA ICE, INC. v. SNEE, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!02809

Western District of North Carolina

KONA ICE, INC. v. BUMGARNER, C.A. No. 3:17!00563

Eastern District of Texas

KONA ICE, INC. v. HODGSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00667

Southern District of Texas

KONA ICE COMPANY v. CROWDER, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!02837

Western District of Texas

KONA ICE, INC. v. DETAVERNIER, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!00931

-8- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 12 of 20

SECTION B MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR CONSIDERATION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2291 - IN RE: WESSON OIL MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Conagra Brands, Inc., to reassign this MDL, comprised of the following cases, from the United States District Court for the Central District of California to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

Central District of California

BRISENO v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., C.A. No. 2:11!05379 TOOMER v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., C.A. No. 2:11!06127 MCFADDEN v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., C.A. No. 2:11!06402 RUIZ v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., C.A. No. 2:11!06480 KREIN v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., C.A. No. 2:11!07097 VIRR v. CONAGRA FODS, INC., C.A. No. 2:11!08421 SCARPELLI, ET AL. v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., C.A. No. 2:11!08513 ( D. New Jersey, C.A. No. 2:11!04038) ANDRADE v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., C.A. No. 2:11!09308

MDL No. 2295 ! IN RE: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA) LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, to transfer the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California:

Middle District of Florida

WILLIAMS v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, C.A. No. 6:17!02064

MDL No. 2406 ! IN RE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Reva, Inc., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama:

Southern District of Florida

REVA, INC. v. HEALTHKEEPERS INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!24158

-9- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 13 of 20

MDL No. 2433 ! IN RE: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C!8 PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION

Oppositions of defendants E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company to transfer of the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio:

Southern District of West Virginia

RISER v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!03795 GREGG v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!03926 BRAGG v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!04228 STOVER v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!04375 ANDERSON, ET AL. v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:17!04400

MDL No. 2557 ! IN RE: AUTO BODY SHOP ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Government Employees Insurance Company to transfer the following action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida:

District of Oregon

LEIF'S AUTO COLLISION CENTERS, LLC v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:17!01822

MDL No. 2590 ! IN RE: NAVISTAR MAXXFORCE ENGINES MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Christopher Moser to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

Eastern District of Texas

MOSER v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!00598

-10- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 14 of 20

MDL No. 2599 ! IN RE: TAKATA AIRBAG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Arthur L. Bustos, et al., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

District of New Mexico

BUSTOS, ET AL. v. LUCERO, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00058

MDL No. 2613 ! IN RE: TD BANK, N.A., DEBIT CARD OVERDRAFT FEE LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiff Britney Lawrence and Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs, et al., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:

District of New Jersey

LAWRENCE v. TD BANK N.A., C.A. No. 1:17!12583

MDL No. 2627 ! IN RE: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS CHINESE!MANUFACTURED FLOORING PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Kaleigh Craig, et al., and Bryan Gaus, et al., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia:

District of Nebraska

CRAIG, ET AL. v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., C.A. No. 8:17!00480

Northern District of West Virginia

GAUS, ET AL. v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!00177

-11- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 15 of 20

MDL No. 2738 ! IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Darren Cartwright, et al.; Maureen Kassimali, et al.; Janice M. Callahan, et al.; and Phyllis D. Smith, et al., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey:

Eastern District of Missouri

CARTWRIGHT, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:17!02851 KASSIMALI, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00014

Middle District of Pennsylvania

CALLAHAN, ET AL. v. ACME MARKETS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00022 SMITH, ET AL. v. GIANT FOOD STORES, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00023

MDL No. 2741 ! IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Joseph Shible and Richard Heinzen, et al., and defendant Monsanto Company to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Eastern District of Arkansas

WINDLE, ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 4:18!00023

District of Delaware

SHIBLE v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:18!00080

Eastern District of Missouri

HEINZEN, ET AL. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 4:17!02881

-12- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 16 of 20

MDL No. 2754 ! IN RE: ELIQUIS (APIXABAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

District of Delaware

BAGINSKI v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01607 MORROW v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01608 BATES v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01609 RISNER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01610 GREEN v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01611 HASSENPFLUG v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01644 BEECHIM v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01666 BISHOP v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01667 WALLS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01694 EDMONDSON v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01695 HAGEDORN v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01708 ARDEN v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01709 CARTER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01715 LOONEY v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01716 SWEENEY v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01756 WOLFE v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01757 HOWARD v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01759 CALLAIS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01760 MELSER v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01761 DOLLAR v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01762 JENNINGS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01763 TOUPS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01764 RUGGLES v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01765 JENKINS v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01766 DOWELL v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01767 FRIDDLE v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01768

-13- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 17 of 20

MDL No. 2777 ! IN RE: CHRYSLER!DODGE!JEEP ECODIESEL MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Chrysler Automobiles N.V., FCA US LLC, Sergio Marchionne, Scott Kunselman, Michael Dahl, Steve Mazure, and Robert E. Lee to transfer the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Southern District of New York

PIRNIK v. FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES N.V., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:15!07199

MDL No. 2782 ! IN RE: ETHICON PHYSIOMESH FLEXIBLE COMPOSITE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Janice Gilmore to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia:

Southern District of Indiana

GILMORE v. HOWARD, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00087

MDL No. 2800 ! IN RE: EQUIFAX, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Ashley Abramson, et al.; Katiushka Rebeca Acosta-Smith, et al.; City of Chicago; Kevin L. Cofield, Sr., et al.; Craig Ward, et al.; and Craven Randall Casper and defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc., and Trans Union, LLC to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia:

Central District of California

ABRAMSON, ET AL. v. EQUIFAX INC., C.A. No. 8:17!02201 ACOSTA!SMITH, ET AL. v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00005

Northern District of Illinois

CITY OF CHICAGO v. EQUIFAX, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!07798

District of Maryland

COFIELD, SR., ET AL. v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!03119 WARD, ET AL. v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!03246

-14- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 18 of 20

Middle District of North Carolina

CASPER v. EQUIFAX, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!01004

MDL No. 2804 ! IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION

Oppositions of certain plaintiffs and defendants KVK-Tech, Inc., and Bloodworth Wholesale Drugs, Inc., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio:

Southern District of Alabama

THE ESTATE OF BRUCE BROCKEL, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH DONNA BROCKEL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00521

Northern District of Georgia

THE COUNTY OF FULTON v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!04757

Eastern District of Kentucky

THE COUNTY OF FLOYD v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 7:17!00186 PIKE v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 7:17!00193 KNOTT v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 7:18!00006

Middle District of Louisiana

LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE & INDEMNITY COMPANY D/B/A BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF LOUISIANA, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01766

District of New Jersey

CITY OF PATERSON v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!13433

Southern District of Ohio

JEFFERSON COUNTY, OHIO v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00037

District of Oregon

COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02010

-15- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 19 of 20

Northern District of West Virginia

BROOKE COUNTY COMMISSION v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00009 HANCOCK COUNTY COMMISSION v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00010 HARRISON COUNTY COMMISSION v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00011 LEWIS COUNTY COMMISSION v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00012 MARSHALL COUNTY COMMISSION v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00013 OHIO COUNTY COMMISSION v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00014 TYLER COUNTY COMMISSION v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00015 WETZEL COUNTY COMMISSION v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00016

Western District of Wisconsin

ST. CROIX CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF WISCONSIN v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00914

MDL No. 2823 ! IN RE: BERNZOMATIC AND WORTHINGTON BRANDED HANDHELD TORCH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Jason Lou Peralta and Kurtis M. Bailey to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Central District of California:

District of Arizona

PERALTA v. WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!03195

Central District of California

MARMONT, ET AL. v. BERNZOMATIC CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!00848

Northern District of Illinois

BAILEY v. BERNZOMATIC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!07548

District of South Carolina

LOFTON v. IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01358

-16- Case MDL No. 2291 Document 43 Filed 02/15/18 Page 20 of 20

RULE 11.1: HEARING SESSIONS AND ORAL ARGUMENT

(i) The parties affected by a motion to transfer may agree to waive oral argument. The Panel will take this into consideration in determining the need for oral argument.

(i) the dispositive issue(s) have been authoritatively decided; or (ii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

Unless otherwise ordered, the Panel shall consider all other matters, such as a motion for reconsideration, upon the basis of the pleadings.

May 31, 2018 Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

NOTICE OF HEARING SESSION

DATE OF HEARING SESSION: May 31, 2018

LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Courtroom No. 2525, 25th Floor 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604

SCHEDULED MATTERS: Matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session are listed on the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session.

- 2 -

For those matters listed on Section A of the Schedule, the "Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument" must be filed in this office no later than May 14, 2018. The procedures governing Panel oral argument (Panel Rule 11.1) are attached. The Panel strictly adheres to these procedures.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel cc: Clerk, United States District for the Northern District of Illinois Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 3 of 20

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

HEARING SESSION ORDER

The Panel issues the following orders in connection with its next hearing session,

IT IS ORDERED that on May 31, 2018, the Panel will convene a hearing session in Chicago, Illinois, to consider the matters on the attached Schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel may, on its own initiative, consider transfer of any or all of the actions in those matters to any district or districts.

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

______Sarah S. Vance Chair

Marjorie O. Rendell Charles R. Breyer Lewis A. Kaplan Ellen Segal Huvelle R. David Proctor Catherine D. Perry Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 4 of 20

SCHEDULE OF MATTERS FOR HEARING SESSION May 31, 2018 !! Chicago, Illinois

SECTION A MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2833 ! IN RE: FEDLOAN STUDENT LOAN SERVICING LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Adam Morris, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania:

Northern District of Illinois

ROCKWELL, ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, C.A. No. 1:18!00367

Northern District of Ohio

FORD, ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!00049

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

MORRIS, ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, C.A. No. 2:18!00031 CLANCY v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, C.A. No. 2:18!00753

Middle District of Pennsylvania

SALVATORE v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, C.A. No. 1:17!00385 GALLAGHER v. PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, C.A. No. 1:17!02416 Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 5 of 20

MDL No. 2834 ! IN RE: PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Personal Web Technologies, LLC, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of California

PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. AIRBNB, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00149 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. AMICUS FTW, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00150 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. ATLASSIAN, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00154 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. CLOUD 66, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00155 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. CUREBIT,INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00156 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. DOXIMITY, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00157 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. FANDOR, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00159 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. GOLDBELY, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00160 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. GOPRO, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00161 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. HEROKU, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00162 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. LEAP MOTION, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00163 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. MELIAN LABS, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00165 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. MYFITNESSPAL, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00166 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00169 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. REDDIT, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00170 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. ROBLOX CORPORATION, C.A. No. 5:18!00171 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. STITCHFIX, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00173

-2- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 6 of 20

PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. STUMBLEUPON, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00174 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. TEESPRING, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00175 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. TOPHATTER, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00176 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. VENMO, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00177 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. WEBFLOW, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00178 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. SQUARE, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00183 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. VEND, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00196 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. MERKLE, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!00409 AMAZON.COM, INC., ET AL. v. PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00767

District of Delaware

PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. CAPTERRA, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00133 PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. KARMA MOBILITY INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00134 PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. LIVECHAT SOFTWARE SA, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00135 PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. MATCH GROUP, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00136 PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. WEDDINGWIRE, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00137

Eastern District of New York

PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. ATLAS OBSCURA, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00164 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. KICKSTARTER, PBC, C.A. No. 1:18!00206 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. CLOUD WARMER INC., C.A. No. 2:18!00205

-3- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 7 of 20

Southern District of New York

PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. BDG MEDIA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00212 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. BITLY, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00216 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. BLUE APRON, LLC, C.A. No. 1:18!00217 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. CENTAUR MEDIA USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00219 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. FAB COMMERCE & DESIGN, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00220 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. FOOD52, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00222 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. PANJIVA, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00223 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. GROUP NINE MEDIA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00268 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. FANDUEL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00269 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. ROCKETHUB, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00271 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. SPONGECELL, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00272

Eastern District of Texas

PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. YOTPO LTD, C.A. No. 4:18!00045 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. LESSON NINE GMBH, C.A. No. 4:18!00046 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. FIVERR INTERNATIONAL LTD., C.A. No. 4:18!00047 PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL. v. MWM MY WEDDING MATCH LTD., C.A. No. 4:18!00049

-4- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 8 of 20

MDL No. 2835 ! IN RE: IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Microsoft Corporation to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas:

District of Delaware

IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01153

Eastern District of Texas

IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00744

Northern District of Texas

IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. FUJITSU AMERICA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16!03319 IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16!03320 IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16!03322 IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01259 IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02699 IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. ZTE CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!03112 MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, C.A. No. 3:18!00222

Western District of Texas

IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. DELL INC., C.A. No. 1:17!00999 IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. HP INC., C.A. No. 1:17!01068 IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!00143

-5- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 9 of 20

MDL No. 2836 ! IN RE: ZETIA (EZETIMIBE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund and Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York:

Eastern District of New York

UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00763 PHILADELPHIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01216

Eastern District of Virginia

FWK HOLDINGS, LLC v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00023 FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00035 CESAR CASTILLO, INC. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00039 ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00071 SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00108

MDL No. 2838 ! IN RE: BROILER CHICKEN GROWER ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Haff Poultry, Inc., et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma:

Eastern District of North Carolina

HAFF POULTRY, INC., ET AL. v. KOCH FOODS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 7:18!00031

Eastern District of Oklahoma

HAFF POULTRY, INC., ET AL. v. TYSON FOODS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!00033

-6- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 10 of 20

MDL No. 2839 ! IN RE: LURASIDONE PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey:

District of Delaware

SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD., ET AL. v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, C.A. No. 1:18!00256 SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD., ET AL. v. FIRST TIME US GENERICS, LLC, C.A. No. 1:18!00369

District of New Jersey

SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD., ET AL. v. EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., C.A. No. 2:18!02065 SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD., ET AL. v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02620

Eastern District of New York

SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD., ET AL. v. INVAGEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., C.A. No. 1:18!01444

Middle District of North Carolina

SUMITOMO DAINIPPON PHARMA CO., LTD., ET AL. v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00185

MDL No. 2840 ! IN RE: COMERICA BANK WOODBRIDGE INVESTMENT LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Mark Baker, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Central District of California

JAY BEYNON FAMILY TRUSTED DTD 10/23/1998, ET AL. v. COMERICA BANK, C.A. No. 2:18!00103 PRINCE, ET AL. v. COMERICA BANK, C.A. No. 2:18!00430 LANDMAN, ET AL. v. COMERICA BANK, C.A. No. 2:18!00471 GORDON, ET AL. v. COMERICA BANK, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01298

-7- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 11 of 20

Southern District of Florida

BAKER, ET AL. v. COMERICA BANK, C.A. No. 0:18!60524

MDL No. 2841 ! IN RE: MONAT HAIR CARE PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Amber Alabaster and Crystal Merritt to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas:

Southern District of Florida

SOHOVICH v. MONAT GLOBAL CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!20624 WHITMIRE, ET AL. v. MONAT GLOBAL CORP., C.A. No. 1:18!20636 MCWHORTOR, ET AL. v. MONAT GLOBAL CORP., C.A. No. 1:18!20870

Western District of Oklahoma

ALABASTER, ET AL. v. MONAT GLOBAL CORP., C.A. No. 5:18!00224

Northern District of Texas

MERRITT v. MONAT GLOBAL CORP., C.A. No. 3:18!00657

MDL No. 2842 ! IN RE: CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE VOLATILITY INDEX MANIPULATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Eric J. Levy, Living Trust UA dated 1/21/10, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

Northern District of Illinois

TOMASULO v. CBOE EXCHANGE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02025

Southern District of New York

SAMUEL v. JOHN DOES, C.A. No. 1:18!01593 QUINT v. DRW HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01980 MUSSO v. JOHN DOES, C.A. No. 1:18!02269 LEVY, LIVING TRUST UA DATED 1/21/10, ET AL. v. JOHN DOES, C.A. No. 1:18!02552

-8- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 12 of 20

MDL No. 2843 ! IN RE: FACEBOOK, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY USER PROFILE LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Theresa Beiner, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of California

PRICE v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!01732 RUBIN v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!01852 O'KELLY v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!01915 BEINER, ET AL. v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!01953 GENNOCK, ET AL. v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01891

Northern District of Illinois

COMFORTE, ET AL. v. CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02120

District of New Jersey

MALSKOFF, ET AL. v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!04451

Southern District of Texas

LODOWSKI v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00907

MDL No. 2844 ! IN RE: FLORIDA, PUERTO RICO, AND U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS 2016 AND 2017 HURRICANE SEASONS FLOOD CLAIMS LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Marcia Samuelson, et al., and Felix Guardiola,, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Middle District of Florida

NETKA v. FIRST COMMUNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 3:18!00180 ACKER, ET AL. v. TOWER HILL PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:17!00439 BATISTA, ET AL. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 8:17!02081 GUARDIOLA, ET AL. v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, C.A. No. 8:17!02208 AUNER, ET AL. v. TOWER HILL PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 8:17!02209

-9- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 13 of 20

GUARDIOLA, ET AL. v. AMERICAN STRATEGIC INSURANCE, C.A. No. 8:17!02211 WASSEN, ET AL. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 8:17!02213 SAMUELSON, ET AL. v. TOWER HILL PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 8:17!02214 SHELDON, ET AL. v. TOWER HILL PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 8:17!02215 CONNERS v. TOWER HILL PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 8:17!02937

Northern District of Florida

CEDAR KEY MARINA II INC. v. WRIGHT NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:17!00236 PATE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:17!00238

-10- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 14 of 20

SECTION B MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR CONSIDERATION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2047 ! IN RE: CHINESE!MANUFACTURED DRYWALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Andre Amorin, et al., and defendants Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., and Tai’an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd., to remand, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Eastern District of Louisiana

AMORIN, ET AL. v. TAISHAN GYPSUM CO., LTD., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:11-01672 (S.D. Florida, C.A. No. 1:11!22408)

MDL No. 2158 ! IN RE: ZIMMER DUROM HIP CUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs David Foscue, et al., for remand, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), of the following action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas:

District of New Jersey

FOSCUE, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:12!07491 (W.D. Arkansas, C.A. No. 1:12!01083)

MDL No. 2187 ! IN RE: C.R. BARD, INC., PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Noetic Specialty Insurance Company to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia:

Eastern District of Virginia

NOETIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. MEDTRONIC PLC, C.A. No. 1:18!00139

-11- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 15 of 20

MDL No. 2244 ! IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of relators Dr. Antoni Nargol and Dr. David Langton to transfer the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas:

District of Massachusetts

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:12!10896

MDL No. 2428 ! IN RE: FRESENIUS GRANUFLO/NATURALYTE DIALYSATE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Josephine Gallardo Hernandez, et al., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts:

Southern District of Texas

GALLARDO HERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. KIDNEY SPECIALISTS OF SOUTH TEXAS, P.A., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00056

MDL No. 2543 ! IN RE: GENERAL MOTORS LLC IGNITION SWITCH LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Richard Ronquillo, et al., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

Western District of Texas

RONQUILLO, ET AL. v. BRAVO SOUTHWEST, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00016

MDL No. 2575 ! IN RE: FLUIDMASTER, INC., WATER CONNECTOR COMPONENTS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of defendant Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

District of Massachusetts

FLUIDMASTER, INC. v. MERRIMACK MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:18!10260

-12- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 16 of 20

MDL No. 2599 ! IN RE: TAKATA AIRBAG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiff William Hogan, Jr., and defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Middle District of Florida

HOGAN v. GOMEZ, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00134

Northern District of Georgia

MAESTRI v. MERCEDES!BENZ USA, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01070

MDL No. 2738 ! IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey:

Northern District of Illinois

FRYE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00940

Eastern District of Missouri

GAVIN, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00212 REISING, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00380

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

STORM, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01049

MDL No. 2741 ! IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Ralph A. Applegate transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Southern District of Ohio

APPLEGATE v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:18!00045

-13- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 17 of 20

MDL No. 2775 ! IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Francis Gregg Proudfoot, II, to transfer of the Proudfoot action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland and motions of plaintiffs Michael Tipsord, et al., to transfer the Tipsord action and defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc., to transfer the Lafountain, McAnneny, Bucalo, and Shuker actions to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland:

District of Connecticut

LAFOUNTAIN v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!01598 MCANNENY v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., C.A. No. 3:17!00012 PROUDFOOT v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., C.A. No. 3:17!01106

Central District of Illinois

TIPSORD, ET AL. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., C.A. No. 1:16!01339

Northern District of Illinois

BUCALO, ET AL. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!06911

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

SHUKER, ET AL. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, PLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:13!06158

MDL No. 2800 ! IN RE: EQUIFAX, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Deborah Walton and Cedric Forrest to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia:

Southern District of Indiana

WALTON v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00225

Southern District of Texas

FORREST v. EQUIFAX INC., C.A. No. 4:18!00817

-14- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 18 of 20

MDL No. 2804 ! IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs and defendant Mylan Inc., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio:

District of Delaware

STATE OF DELAWARE v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00383

Middle District of Florida

THE COUNTY OF OSCEOLA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00164

Eastern District of Kentucky

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ET AL. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, C.A. No. 3:18!00010

Eastern District of Louisiana

ST. BERNARD PARISH GOVERNMENT v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02717

District of Maryland

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00519

District of Montana

STATE OF MONTANA v. PURDUE PHARMA, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00033

Eastern District of Oklahoma

THE CHEROKEE NATION v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00056

Eastern District of Texas

COUNTY OF VAN ZANDT v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00064

-15- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 19 of 20

Southern District of Texas

COUNTY OF HARRIS v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00490

Southern District of West Virginia

THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF CLAY COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00413

-16- Case MDL No. 2047 Document 517 Filed 04/16/18 Page 20 of 20

RULE 11.1: HEARING SESSIONS AND ORAL ARGUMENT

(i) The parties affected by a motion to transfer may agree to waive oral argument. The Panel will take this into consideration in determining the need for oral argument.

(i) the dispositive issue(s) have been authoritatively decided; or (ii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

Unless otherwise ordered, the Panel shall consider all other matters, such as a motion for reconsideration, upon the basis of the pleadings.

July 26, 2018 Case MDL No. 2847 Document 42 Filed 07/09/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: HUDSON'S BAY COMPANY CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION Antranik Mekerdijian v. Saks Fifth Avenue LLC, et al., ) S.D. New York, C.A. No. 1:18-05844 ) MDL No. 2847 (Formerly C.D. California, C.A. No. 2:18-02649) )

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED JUNE 15, 2018

This action (Mekerdijian), bearing the Central District of California civil action number of 2:18-02649, was included in plaintiff Latusha Vains' motion to transfer several actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The matter is scheduled to be heard at the Panel's July 26, 2018, hearing in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

The Panel has now been advised that this action was transferred from the Central District of California to the Southern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), by the Honorable John F. Walker in an order filed on June 26, 2018. Coincident to this transfer, Mekerdijian was assigned a new Southern District of New York civil action number of 1:18-05844.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all documents filed with the Panel's CM/ECF system under C.A. No. 2:18-02649 will be re-designated as C.A. No. 1:18-05844.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Order and Schedule filed on June 15, 2018, is likewise amended to reflect the new Southern District of New York civil action number of 1:18-05844.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2848 Document 42 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED JUNE 15, 2018

IT IS ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and attached Schedule filed by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on June 15, 2018, are amended to include the following additional civil actions on Section A of the Schedule for the hearing session on July 26, 2018, in Santa Fe, New Mexico:

MDL No. 2848 IN RE: ZOSTAVAX (ZOSTER VACCINE LIVE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Merck & Co., Inc., and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida or the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York:

Middle District of Florida

ERICKSON v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17-0562 PILLITTERI v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18-0037

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 26

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

NOTICE OF HEARING SESSION

DATE OF HEARING SESSION: July 26, 2018

LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: Santiago E. Campos United States Courthouse Aspen Courtroom, 2nd Floor 106 South Federal Place Santa Fe, New Mexico

SCHEDULED MATTERS: Matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session are listed on the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session.

ORAL ARGUMENT:

• The Panel carefully considers the positions advocated in filings with the Panel when it allocates time to attorneys presenting oral argument. The Panel, therefore, expects attorneys to adhere to those positions including those concerning an appropriate transferee district. Any change in position should be conveyed to Panel staff before the beginning of oral argument. Where an attorney thereafter advocates a position different from that conveyed to Panel staff, the Panel may reduce the allotted argument time and decline to hear further from that attorney. Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 2 of 26

- 2 -

For those matters listed on Section A of the Schedule, the "Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument" must be filed in this office no later than July 9, 2018. The procedures governing Panel oral argument (Panel Rule 11.1) are attached. The Panel strictly adheres to these procedures.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel cc: Clerk, United States District for the District of New Mexico Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 3 of 26

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

HEARING SESSION ORDER

The Panel issues the following orders in connection with its next hearing session,

IT IS ORDERED that on July 26, 2018, the Panel will convene a hearing session in Santa Fe, New Mexico, to consider the matters on the attached Schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel may, on its own initiative, consider transfer of any or all of the actions in those matters to any district or districts.

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

______Sarah S. Vance Chair

Marjorie O. Rendell Charles R. Breyer Lewis A. Kaplan Ellen Segal Huvelle R. David Proctor Catherine D. Perry Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 4 of 26

SCHEDULE OF MATTERS FOR HEARING SESSION July 26, 2018 !! Santa Fe, New Mexico

SECTION A MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2845 ! IN RE: REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado:

Central District of California

REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. HULU, LLC, C.A. No. 2:17!07611

District of Colorado

REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. SLING TV LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!02097 REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. POLYCOM, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!02692 REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. APPLE INC., C.A. No. 1:17!02869

District of Delaware

REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. BRIGHTCOVE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01519 REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. HAIVISION NETWORK VIDEO INC., C.A. No. 1:17!01520 REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. NETFLIX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01692 REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., C.A. No. 1:17!01693

District of Massachusetts

REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., C.A. No. 1:18!10355 Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 5 of 26

Eastern District of Texas

REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!00549 REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., C.A. No. 6:17!00591 REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00113

MDL No. 2846 ! IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Stephen Silber, et al.; Gladys Broyles; Marianna Coussas; Tyler Lyon; Michael Heili; Phyllis Manuel; Gregory Rowe; Wayne Ogle; Thomas Spencer; Steven Zemko; Gerald Lane; Pauline R. Currey; Kelli Abshire, et al.; Josephene Williams; and Shane Wade to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri:

District of Arizona

BOURLOKAS v. DAVOL INCORPORATED, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00615

Eastern District of California

SILBER, ET AL. v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00479 GRESCHNER v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:15!01663 HANSEN v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00495

Southern District of Florida

DAWSON-WEBB v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:17!62012 BARBAREE v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 9:18!80243

Central District of Illinois

MCGINNIS v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!01255

Northern District of Illinois

COLEMAN v. DAVOL, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!01706

-2- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 6 of 26

Eastern District of Kentucky

MOORE v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:17!00132

Western District of Kentucky

WHITEHOUSE v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00020

Eastern District of Louisiana

STIPELCOVICH v. C.R. BARD, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!09656 MCMANUS v. C.R. BARD, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!11836 BAPTIST v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!12718 ROBERTS, SR., ET AL. v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!13657 SANDERS, ET AL. v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02884

Southern District of Mississippi

DOVE v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00003

Eastern District of Missouri

GREENWOOD v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00039 BROYLES v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00513

Western District of Missouri

COUSSAS v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!04015 POWELL v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!05019 LYON v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00039 ELI v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00116 ELLIOT v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00125 HEILI v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00130 MANUEL v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00131 POWELL v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00156 SCHAPELER v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00169 CHRISSAN v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00171 ROWE v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!03019 LEE v. C.R. BARD, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!03075

-3- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 7 of 26

District of New Jersey

OGLE v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00819 BURGESS v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01390 SPENCER v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01692 GALLOW v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02533 VOLPE v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02602 ZEMKO v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02742 NEWLAND, ET AL. v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02915

District of New Mexico

NANCE v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00003

Eastern District of New York

FURLEITER v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01229

Northern District of Ohio

KNAUSS, ET AL. v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00316

Southern District of Ohio

LANE v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00164 CURREY v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00222 ABSHIRE, ET AL. v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00268

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

WROTEN, ET AL. v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!04546 GORDON v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!04553

District of South Carolina

BROWN v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00580 CAMPBELL, ET AL. v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00581 ADAMS v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00582 BRUGGER, ET AL. v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00228

-4- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 8 of 26

Middle District of Tennessee

TERRELL v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01575

Eastern District of Texas

WILLIAMS v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00151

Southern District of Texas

BECERRA v. C.R. BARD, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00023 WADE v. DAVOL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01112

MDL No. 2847 ! IN RE: HUDSON'S BAY COMPANY CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Latusha Vains to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

Central District of California

MEKERDIJIAN v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02649

District of Delaware

BEEKMAN v. LORD & TAYLOR, LLC, C.A. No. 1:18!00521

Southern District of New York

TAFET, ET AL. v. HUDSON'S BAY COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02980 VAINS v. HUDSONS'S BAY COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!03366

-5- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 9 of 26

MDL No. 2848 ! IN RE: ZOSTAVAX (ZOSTER VACCINE LIVE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Middle District of Florida

BELL v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!01320 MCRAE v. MERCK & CO., INC., C.A. No. 3:18!00483 BLANCHARD v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00038 JONES, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00144 ERICKSON, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!01672 SMITH v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00043 PATTERSON v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00092 ALFORD v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00093 GRENIER v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00407 MELENDEZ v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00408 KELLY v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00604 MALBERG v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00034 BENCIVENGA v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00156 BOWMAN, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00434 STEPHENS v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00512 DEKER v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00650 DOLAN v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00651 MELUCCI v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00695 BOCKUS v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00715

Northern District of Florida

HIRAM v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00051 ADAMS v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00155 SHEPPARD, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00200 GREEN v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00007

Southern District of Florida

ENDRESEN-WORTHY v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!14095 SOROKO v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 9:18!80021

-6- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 10 of 26

District of Massachusetts

VERGE v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!30036

District of New Jersey

GASPI v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!12849 SMART, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!12853 KIRK v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!13689 GRACE, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01844 WARD, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO.,INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!03811 GASPARD v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!11483 SYKES, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!11657 SEIGMAN v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!12210 PINKSTAFF, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!12212 FARRINGTON v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!13496 TEMPLET, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00457 WAGGONER, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00987 BROWN, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02460 CASSIDY, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02527 GEISHEKER v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02544

Eastern District of New York

BRAVO, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00687 BRUMFIELD, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!06526 ZACCANELLI, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!07106 ALBISANO, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00365 CLARK, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01592

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

DOTTER, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!04686 ESTATE OF CARMEN RODRIGUEZ v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00485 BILLECI, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00486 BENTLEY v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01122 DOHERTY, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01415 MOLOUKI v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01983 ELMEGREEN v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!02044

-7- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 11 of 26

Western District of Pennsylvania

LEE v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00419

Eastern District of Wisconsin

EVERTS, ET AL. v. MERCK & CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00020

MDL No. 2849 ! IN RE: STARBUCKS CORPORATION ACCESS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Starbucks Corporation to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California:

Central District of California

JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00717

Eastern District of California

JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 2:16!02489 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 2:16!02792 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 2:16!02797 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 2:16!02820 JOHNSON v. VALLEY MACK PLAZA CO. L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01125 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 2:17!01718 JOHNSON v. BRIXTON SHERWOOD, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!02082 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 2:17!02521 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 2:18!00395

Northern District of California

JOHNSON v. LOS GATOS GATEWAY, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16!03495 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 3:16!06792 JOHNSON v. BLACKHAWK CENTERCAL, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!02454 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 3:17!06836 JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 3:18!01134 JOHNSON v. GOODHUE, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:16!00724 JOHNSON v. SEBANC, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00585 JOHNSON v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00972 JOHNSON v. LET IT FLHO, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01293

-8- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 12 of 26

JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, C.A. No. 5:18!01595 JOHNSON v. MONTEREY FISH COMPANY, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!01985

MDL No. 2850 ! IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Dustin Theobald to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania:

District of Maryland

ARCURI, ET AL. v. KNORR-BREMSE AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01191

Western District of Pennsylvania

CARRUTH v. KNORR-BREMSE AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00469 THEOBALD v. KNORR-BREMSE AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00526

MDL No. 2851 ! IN RE: GREAT PLAINS LENDING, LLC, LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Great Plains Lending, LLC, to transfer certain claims in the following actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas:

Northern District of California

BRICE, ET AL. v. REES, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!01200

Middle District of North Carolina

GRANGER, ET AL. v. GREAT PLAINS LENDING, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00112

Eastern District of Virginia

GIBBS, ET AL. v. PLAIN GREEN, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!00495

-9- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 13 of 26

MDL No. 2852 ! IN RE: GIANT EAGLE, INC., FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA) LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Giant Eagle, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania:

Southern District of Indiana

FITCH v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!01236

Western District of Pennsylvania

JONES v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., C.A. No. 2:18!00282

MDL No. 2853 ! IN RE: SAMSUNG PLASMA TELEVISION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Best Buy Stores, L.P.; Sears Holding Management; and Sears Roebuck and Co. to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida:

Northern District of California

BRONSON v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02300

Northern District of Florida

HOWE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., C.A. No. 1:16!00386

Northern District of Illinois

WARE, ET AL. v. BEST BUY STORES, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00886

District of Utah

MCCALLON v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00114

-10- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 14 of 26

MDL No. 2854 ! IN RE: EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA) AND WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee or the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas:

Northern District of Alabama

BASCOMB, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00064

Eastern District of Arkansas

BARNETTE, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00004

Northern District of Florida

MARSHALL, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00048

Northern District of Georgia

RYTE, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00186

Western District of Kentucky

BELL, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00011

Eastern District of Louisiana

CARTER, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00156

Eastern District of Missouri

BARBER, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00010

-11- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 15 of 26

Northern District of Mississippi

CAMPBELL, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00011

Western District of North Carolina

ALLEN, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00028

Northern District of Oklahoma

NICKS, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00030

District of South Carolina

BRANDON, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00128

Middle District of Tennessee

ACKLIN, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00028

Southern District of Texas

ARROYO, ET AL. v. EXPRESS COURIER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00010

MDL No. 2855 ! IN RE: ABA LAW SCHOOL ACCREDITATION LITIGATION

Motion of defendants American Bar Association (ABA), The ABA Council of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, and The ABA Accreditation Committee of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina:

District of Arizona

ARIZONA SUMMIT LAW SCHOOL LLC, ET AL. v. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01580

-12- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 16 of 26

Middle District of Florida

FLORIDA COASTAL SCHOOL OF LAW, INC., ET AL. v. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00621

Western District of North Carolina

CHARLOTTE SCHOOL OF LAW, LLC, ET AL. v. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00256

MDL No. 2856 ! IN RE: LOUISIANA COASTAL ZONE LAND LOSS LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Chevron U.S.A., Inc.; Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc.; The Texas Company; The Union Oil Company of California; Chevron Pipe Line Company; ConocoPhillips Company; Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP; The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company LLC; Exxon Mobil Corporation; Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc.; Atlantic Richfield Company; BP America Production Company; and BP Products North America Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana:

Eastern District of Louisiana

PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. ROZEL OPERATING COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05189 JEFFERSON PARISH, ET AL. v. DESTIN OPERATING COMPANY, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05206 PARISH OF PLAQUEMINES, ET AL. v. HILCORP ENERGY COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05210 JEFFERSON PARISH, ET AL. v. ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05213 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. EXCHANGE OIL & GAS CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05215 PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. RIVERWOOD PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05217 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. JUNE ENERGY, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05218 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05220 ST. BERNARD PARISH, ET AL. v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05222 JEFFERSON PARISH, ET AL. v. CHEVRON U.S.A. HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05224

-13- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 17 of 26

PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. GREAT SOUTHERN OIL & GAS CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05227 PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. NORTHCOAST OIL COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05228 PLAQUEMINES, ET AL. v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05230 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. LINDER OIL COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05231 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05234 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. GOODRICH PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05238 PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. APACHE OIL CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05240 JEFFERSON PARISH, ET AL. v. EQUITABLE PETROLEUM CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05242 JEFFERSON PARISH v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05246 JEFFERSON PARISH v. CANLAN OIL COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05252 PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. TOTAL PETROCHEMICALS & REFINING USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05256 JEFFERSON PARISH v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05257 PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. BEPCO, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05258 PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. PALM ENERGY OFFSHORE, L.L.C., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05259 PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. HELIS OIL & GAS COMPANY, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05260 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. CASKIDS OPERATING COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05262 PLAQUEMINES PARISH v. HHE ENERGY COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05263 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. CAMPBELL ENERGY CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05264 PLAQUEMINES PARISH, ET AL. v. LLOG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05265

Western District of Louisiana

CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. AUSTER OIL & GAS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00677 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. BALLARD EXPLORATION CO., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00678

-14- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 18 of 26

CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. BRAMMER ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00679 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS CO. LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00682 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. ALPINE EXPLORATION COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00684 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. BAY COQUILLE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00685 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00686 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00687 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. APACHE CORP. OF DELAWARE, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00688 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. ANADARKO E & P ONSHORE LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00689 CAMERON PARISH, ET AL. v. BEPCO, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00690 STUTES, ET AL. v. GULFPORT ENERGY CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00691

MDL No. 2857 ! IN RE: CREDIT SUISSE VELOCITYSHARES DAILY INVERSE VIX SHORT TERM EXCHANGE TRADED NOTES SECURITIES LITIGATION

Motion of defendants Credit Suisse AG, Credit Suisse Group AG, David R. Mathers, Tidjane Thiam, and Janus Index & Calculation Services LLC, to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

Northern District of Alabama

HALBERT, ET AL. v. CREDIT SUISSE AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00615

Southern District of New York

CHAHAL v. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02268 EISENBERG v. CREDIT SUISSE AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02319 QIU v. CREDIT SUISSE AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04045

-15- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 19 of 26

SECTION B MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR CONSIDERATION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2391 ! IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Elaine Gift to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana:

Northern District of Illinois

GIFT v. BIOMET, INC. D/B/A ZIMMER BIOMET, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!50132

MDL No. 2504 ! IN RE: AMAZON.COM, INC., FULFILLMENT CENTER FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA) AND WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION

Motions of defendants Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.; Amazon.com, Inc.; and Golden State FC LLC to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky:

Central District of California

HAGMAN, ET AL. v. AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00024

Eastern District of California

TREVINO v. GOLDEN STATE FC LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00120

MDL No. 2591 ! IN RE: SYNGENTA AG MIR162 CORN LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Kenneth P. Kellogg, et al., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas:

District of Minnesota

KELLOGG, ET AL. v. WATTS GUERRA, LLP, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01082

-16- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 20 of 26

MDL No. 2599 ! IN RE: TAKATA AIRBAG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Yossi Shimshi, Mitra Bazzal, Abraham Hirschel, and Joshua Kopple to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Central District of California

SHIMSHI v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC., C.A. No. 2:18!02432 BAZZAL v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA,INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02437 HIRSCHEL, ET AL. v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02454 KOPPLE v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02460

MDL No. 2642 ! IN RE: FLUOROQUINOLONE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Angela Renee Kester to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota:

Eastern District of Oklahoma

KESTER v. JANSSEN SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS, C.A. No. 6:18!00041

MDL No. 2672 ! IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL" MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Wright Law Aspen, LLP to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

District of Colorado

WRIGHT LAW ASPEN, LLP v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00973

-17- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 21 of 26

MDL No. 2734 ! IN RE: ABILIFY (ARIPIPRAZOLE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida:

Central District of California

WYLE, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!03753

Northern District of California

DAVIS, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!02584 GREEN, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!02588 EVANS, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!02614

District of Nevada

JOHNSON, ET AL. v. BRISTOL!MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00143

MDL No. 2738 ! IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey:

Northern District of Illinois

CABEZA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02091 LEACH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02095 LYMAN III v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02123 TORRES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02126 GOMES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02130 SCHULTZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02206 COHN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02262

-18- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 22 of 26

JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02281 O'HALLORAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02410

Southern District of Illinois

MIHALICH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., C.A. No. 3:18!01027

Eastern District of New York

JIMINEZ v. DUANE READE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02152

MDL No. 2782 ! IN RE: ETHICON PHYSIOMESH FLEXIBLE COMPOSITE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs William Perry Newhouse, et al., and defendants Johnson & Johnson; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.; and Ethicon, Inc., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia:

Southern District of West Virginia

NEWHOUSE, ET AL. v. ETHICON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!02735

MDL No. 2800 ! IN RE: EQUIFAX, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Jose D. Iraheta and Valerie D. Morgan to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia:

Western District of Louisiana

IRAHETA v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!01363

Eastern District of Virginia

MORGAN v. EQUIFAX INC., C.A. No. 3:18!00173

-19- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 23 of 26

MDL No. 2804 ! IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION

Oppositions of certain plaintiffs and defendants Paul Madison; Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Aurolife Pharma LLC; Cross Lanes Family Pharmacy, Inc.; MRNB, Inc.; and American Pain Society, Inc., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio:

Southern District of Alabama

AMERICAN RESOURCES INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00145

Central District of California

MASOUD BAMDAD, M.D. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!03662 BURNS v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00745

Northern District of California

ROBINSON RANCHERIA v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02525 HOPLAND BAND OF POMO INDIANS v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02528 SCOTTS VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02529 ROUND VALLEY INDIAN TRIBES, ET AL. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02530 REDWOOD VALLEY OR LITTLE RIVER BAND OF POMO INDIANS OF THE REDWOOD VALLEY RANCHERIA v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02531 GUIDIVILLE RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02532 COYOTE VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02533 CONSOLIDATED TRIBAL HEALTH PROJECT, INC. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02534 CENTER POINT, INC. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02535 BIG VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS OF THE BIG VALLEY RANCHERIA v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02536

-20- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 24 of 26

BIG SANDY RANCHERIA OF WESTERN MONO INDIANS v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02537 CHU v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02576

Northern District of Illinois

RIVERS v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!03116

Northern District of Indiana

CITY OF GARY, INDIANA v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00117

Eastern District of Kentucky

ATTORNEY GENERAL v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 7:18!00050

Western District of Kentucky

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY v. CARDINAL HEALTH 5, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00184

District of Massachusetts

GRACE v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10857

Northern District of Mississippi

NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER, INC., ET AL. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:18!00078

District of New Jersey

COUNTY OF HUDSON v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!09029 SARDELLA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08706

Southern District of New York

KLODZINSKI v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!03927

-21- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 25 of 26

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

THE CITY OF NEW CASTLE, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01472

Southern District of West Virginia

THE COUNTY COMMISSION OF MINGO COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00476 BURTON, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00478 CITY OF HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA, ET AL. v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00580

Western District of Wisconsin

LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00286

MDL No. 2827 ! IN RE: APPLE INC. DEVICE PERFORMANCE LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Carter Donahoe to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of Ohio

DONAHOE v. APPLE, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00763

-22- Case MDL No. 2391 Document 1200 Filed 06/15/18 Page 26 of 26

RULE 11.1: HEARING SESSIONS AND ORAL ARGUMENT

(i) The parties affected by a motion to transfer may agree to waive oral argument. The Panel will take this into consideration in determining the need for oral argument.

(i) the dispositive issue(s) have been authoritatively decided; or (ii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

Unless otherwise ordered, the Panel shall consider all other matters, such as a motion for reconsideration, upon the basis of the pleadings.

September 27, 2018 Case MCP No. 154 Document 5 Filed 09/18/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED AUGUST 16, 2018

IT IS ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and attached Schedule filed by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on August 16, 2018, are amended to include the following multicircuit petition for review on Section B of the Schedule for the hearing session on September 27, 2018, in San Francisco, California:

MCP No. 154 IN RE: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; STATION GVR ACQUISITION, LLC D/B/A GREEN VALLEY RANCH RESORT SPA CASINO AND INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 501, AFL-CIO; 366 NLRB NO. 175, ISSUED ON AUGUST 27, 2018.

Opposition of International Union of Operating Engineers Local 501, AFL-CIO, to the Notice of Multicircuit Petitions for Review filed by the National Labor Relations Board.

SCHEDULE OF PETITIONS

CIRCUIT NO. CASE CAPTION

D.C. Circuit, No. 18-1236 Station GVR Acquisition, LLC d/b/a/ Green Valley Ranch Resort Spa Casino v. NLRB Ninth Circuit, No. 18-72434 International Union of Operating Engineers Local 50, AFL-CIO v. NLRB

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2865 Document 35 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED AUGUST 16, 2018

IT IS ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and attached Schedule for the hearing session on September 27, 2018, in San Francisco, California, filed by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on August 16, 2018, are amended to update the following matter on Section A of the Schedule.

MDL No. 2865 - IN RE: CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK (SKAT) TAX REFUND SCHEME LITIGATION:

Strike the following from District of New Jersey:

SKAT v. AMERICAN INVESTMENT GROUP OF NEW YORK, L.P., ET. AL., C.A. No. 3:18-08876

and insert the following under District of Utah:

SKAT v. AMERICAN INVESTMENT GROUP OF NEW YORK, L.P., ET. AL., C.A. No. 2:18-00678

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MCP No. 153 Document 9 Filed 08/31/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED AUGUST 16, 2018

IT IS ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and attached Schedule filed by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on August 16, 2018, are amended to include the following multicircuit petition for review on on Section B of the Schedule for the hearing session on September 27, 2018, in San Francisco, California:

MCP No. 153 IN RE: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC, 164 FERC 61, 100, ISSUED ON AUGUST 10, 2018

Motion of Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, to reconsider the Panel's order consolidating judicial review of this matter in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

SCHEDULE OF PETITIONS

CIRCUIT NO. CASE CAPTION

D.C. Circuit, No. 18-1224 Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. FERC Fourth Circuit, No. 18-1956 Appalachian Voices, et al. v. FERC

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2865 Document 28 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED AUGUST 16, 2018

MDL No. 2865 - IN RE: CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK (SKAT) TAX REFUND SCHEME LITIGATION:

Strike the following from

District of Connecticut:

SKAT v. AEROVANE LOGISTICS LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL.,C.A. No. 3:18-00757 SKAT v. RANDOM HOLDINGS 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18-00758 SKAT v. EDGEPOINT CAPITAL LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL.,C.A. No. 3:18-00877 SKAT v. HEADSAIL MANUFACTURING LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18-00984

and insert the following under

Southern District of New York

SKAT v. AEROVANE LOGISTICS LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18-7828 SKAT v. RANDOM HOLDINGS 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18-7829 SKAT v. EDGEPOINT CAPITAL LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18-7827 SKAT v. HEADSAIL MANUFACTURING LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18-7824

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 24

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

NOTICE OF HEARING SESSION

DATE OF HEARING SESSION: September 27, 2018

LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: Phillip Burton United States Courthouse Ceremonial Courtroom, 19th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102

SCHEDULED MATTERS: Matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session are listed on the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session.

ORAL ARGUMENT:

- 2 -

For those matters listed on Section A of the Schedule, the "Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument" must be filed in this office no later than September 10, 2018. The procedures governing Panel oral argument (Panel Rule 11.1) are attached. The Panel strictly adheres to these procedures.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel cc: Clerk, United States District for the Northern District of California Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 3 of 24

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

HEARING SESSION ORDER

The Panel issues the following orders in connection with its next hearing session,

IT IS ORDERED that on September 27, 2018, the Panel will convene a hearing session in San Francisco, California, to consider the matters on the attached Schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel may, on its own initiative, consider transfer of any or all of the actions in those matters to any district or districts.

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

______Sarah S. Vance Chair

Marjorie O. Rendell Charles R. Breyer Lewis A. Kaplan Ellen Segal Huvelle R. David Proctor Catherine D. Perry Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 4 of 24

SCHEDULE OF MATTERS FOR HEARING SESSION September 27, 2018 !! San Francisco, California

SECTION A MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2858 ! IN RE: JUMPSPORT, INC., ('845 & '207) PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of defendants WalMart, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores East, LP; Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC; Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC; Sam’s East, Inc.; Sam’s West, Inc.; Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.; American Sports Licensing, LLC; Dick’s Merchandising & Supply Chain, Inc.; Amazon.com; Amazon.com LLC; Academy, Ltd.; BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc.; J. C. Penney Company, Inc.; J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc.; J. C. Penney Purchasing Corporation; and JCP Logistics, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas:

Northern District of Georgia

JUMPSPORT, INC. v. J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01598 JUMPSPORT, INC. v. BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!01689

Eastern District of Texas

JUMPSPORT, INC. v. ACADEMY, LTD DBA ACADEMY SPORTS & OUTDOORS, C.A. No. 6:17!00414 JUMPSPORT, INC. v. WAL!MART STORES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!00645 JUMPSPORT, INC. v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!00663 JUMPSPORT, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 6:17!00666 Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 5 of 24

MDL No. 2859 ! IN RE: ZIMMER M/LTAPER HIP PROSTHESIS OR M/L TAPER HIP PROSTHESIS WITH KINECTIV TECHNOLOGY AND VERSYS FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Elizabeth Hackett, et al., and David Pastor to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota:

District of Alaska

HICKEY, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16!00045 DERIFIELD, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00021

Northern District of California

ROBERTS v. ZIMMER BIOMET, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!03564

Middle District of Florida

HEINEMAN v. ZIMMER BIOMET, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:17!02420

District of Maine

MILLER, ET AL. v. ZIMMER BIOMET, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00265 LLOYD, ET AL. v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00352 MYRICK v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00480 WALDEIER v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00004 PRIDE, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00108 GRAHAM-FORTIN v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00204

Eastern District of Michigan

PASTOR v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!11461

District of Minnesota

HOLLENKAMP, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01304 LAUKKA, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01305 METZGER, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01310 NESS, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01326 HARMS, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01378 HACKETT, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01407

-2- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 6 of 24

Eastern District of New York

VIANIA v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!01641

Southern District of New York

SHAW v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!02119 LUCKASAVAGE, ET AL. v. ZIMMER, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!07451

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

ADAMS v. ZIMMER US, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!00621

Eastern District of Wisconsin

LIESCH, ET AL. v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01036

MDL No. 2860 ! IN RE: MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Manetirony Clervrain to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia:

Eastern District of California

CLERVRAIN v. MITCHELL, C.A. No. 2:18!01716

Southern District of Georgia

CLERVRAIN v. STONE, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00028 CLERVRAIN v. JOHNS, C.A. No. 5:18!00038

District of Kansas

CLERVRAIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!03194 CLERVRAIN v. SESSIONS, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!03039

Southern District of Mississippi

CLERVRAIN v. JULIAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00051

-3- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 7 of 24

Western District of Pennsylvania

CLERVRAIN v. KUTA, C.A. No. 3:18!00083

Eastern District of Texas

CLERVRAIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00313 CLERVRAIN v. CHAPA, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00452 CLERVRAIN v. MELLADY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00058 CLERVRAIN v. SAMUEL, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00059 CLERVRAIN v. MELLENDICK, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00060 CLERVRAIN v. KELLER, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00061

MDL No. 2861 ! IN RE: CUSTARD INSURANCE ADJUSTERS, INC., FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA) AND WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Armen Abgaryan and defendant Custard Insurance Adjusters, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Central District of California

ABGARYAN v. CUSTARD INSURANCE ADJUSTERS, INC., C.A. No. 8:17!01849

Northern District of California

WADLER, ET AL. v. CUSTARD INSURANCE ADJUSTERS, INC., C.A. No. 3:17!05840

MDL No. 2862 ! IN RE: DIISOCYANATES ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Utah Foam Products, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania:

Eastern District of Michigan

ISAAC INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BASF CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!12089

District of New Jersey

C.U.E., INC. v. BASF AG, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!11439

-4- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 8 of 24

Western District of Pennsylvania

UTAH FOAM PRODUCTS, INC. v. BAYER A.G., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00858

MDL No. 2863 ! IN RE: [24]7.AI, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Michael Ford, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Central District of California

PICA v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02876

Northern District of California

FORD, ET AL. v. 24/7, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!02770

Northern District of Georgia

MCGARRY v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02794

MDL No. 2864 ! IN RE: ROUTE 91 HARVEST FESTIVAL SHOOTINGS IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, ON OCTOBER 1, 2017

Motion of MGM Resorts International; Mandalay Bay, LLC; Mandalay Resort Group; MGM Resorts Venue Management, LLC; and MGM Resorts Festival Grounds, LLC, to transfer the following actions to a single United States District Court:

District of Alaska

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. CORBIN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00168

District of Arizona

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. BOOTH, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02250

-5- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 9 of 24

Central District of California

RAMIREZ, ET AL. v. MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05564 PEREDA v. MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05570 MAGGIORE v. MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05640 MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. AASE, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!06113 MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. ABNER, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!06197

Southern District of Florida

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. BRASFIELD, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!22883

District of Nevada

SHEPPARD, ET AL. v. MANDALAY BAY, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01120 MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. ACOSTA, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01288

Southern District of New York

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. SOCCI, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!06451

Southern District of Texas

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. ARCHAMBEAULT, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!02465

District of Utah

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL. v. EARDLEY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00567

-6- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 10 of 24

MDL No. 2865 ! IN RE: CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK (SKAT) TAX REFUND SCHEME LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff SKAT to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

District of Connecticut

SKAT v. AEROVANE LOGISTICS LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00757 SKAT v. RANDOM HOLDINGS 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00758 SKAT v. EDGEPOINT CAPITAL LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00877 SKAT v. FEDERATED LOGISTICS LLC 401K, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00983 SKAT v. HEADSAIL MANUFACTURING LLC ROTH 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00984 SKAT v. TVETER LLC PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00985 SKAT v. VALERIUS LLC SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00987

Southern District of Florida

SKAT v. THE FWC CAPITAL LLC PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!21801 SKAT v. THE RDL CONSULTING GROUP LLC PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!22070

Northern District of Illinois

SKAT v. COLE ENTERPRISES USA RETIREMENT PLAN & TRUST, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!03206 SKAT v. BLUE OCEAN EQUITY LLC RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!03207 SKAT v. KK LAW FIRM RETIREMENT PLAN TRUST, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04082

Eastern District of Kentucky

SKAT v. SRH FARMS LLC 401(K) PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00395 SKAT v. MGH FARMS LLC 401(K) PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00396 SKAT v. JSH FARMS 401(K) PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00397 SKAT v. TRITON FARMS LLC 401(K) PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00398 SKAT v. KRH FARMS LLC 401(K) PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00399 SKAT v. TEW, LP RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00400

-7- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 11 of 24

SKAT v. TEW ENTERPRISES, LLC RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00401 SKAT v. INDUSTRIAL PENSIONS GROUP TRUST, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00402 SKAT v. CASTING PENSIONS GROUP TRUST, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00403 SKAT v. SV HOLDINGS, LLC RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00404 SKAT v. CENTRAL TECHNOLOGIES PENSIONS GROUP TRUST, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00405 SKAT v. BLUEGRASS RETIREMENT GROUP TRUST, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00406 SKAT v. BLUEGRASS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00407 SKAT v. AUTOPARTS PENSIONS GROUP TRUST, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00408 SKAT v. MSJJ RETIREMENT GROUP TRUST, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00409

District of Massachusetts

SKAT v. THE 78 YORKTOWN PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10890 SKAT v. THE CAMBRIDGE TOWN LINE PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10891 SKAT v. THE DIAMOND SCOTT CAPITAL PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10892 SKAT v. THE HOTEL FROMANCE PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10893 SKAT v. THE MOUNTAIN AIR LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10894 SKAT v. THE SKSL LLC PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10895 SKAT v. THE SNOW HILL PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10896 SKAT v. THE WESTRIDGE AVE LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10897 SKAT v. THE SHAPIRO BLUE MANAGEMENT LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!11008 SKAT v. THE PATRICK PARTNERS CONGLOMERATE PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!11011 SKAT v. CSCC CAPITAL PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!11012

District of New Jersey

SKAT v. AMERICAN INVESTMENT GROUP OF NEW YORK, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08876 SKAT v. THE CARDINAL CONSULTING PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08878 SKAT v. THE EGRET ASSOCIATES LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08880 SKAT v. THE CROW ASSOCIATES PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08881 SKAT v. THE HERON ADVISORS PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08882

-8- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 12 of 24

SKAT v. THE HOBOKEN ADVISORS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08883 SKAT v. THE JAYFRAN BLUE PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08884 SKAT v. THE JT HEALTH CONSULTING LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08885 SKAT v. THE LAKEVIEW ADVISORS 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08886 SKAT v. THE OSPREY ASSOCIATES LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08887 SKAT v. THE SANDPIPER PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08888 SKAT v. THE ZEN TRAINING LLC 401(K) PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!08889 SKAT v. THE EVERYTHING CLEAN LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!09439 SKAT v. THE JUMP GROUP LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!09442 SKAT v. THE OAKS GROUP PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!09444 SKAT v. THE WAVE MAVEN LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!09445 SKAT v. THE BALMORAL MANAGEMENT LLC 401K PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10098 SKAT v. THE BEECH TREE PARTNERS 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10108 SKAT v. THE BLACKBIRD 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10109 SKAT v. THE CHAMBERS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10110 SKAT v. FIFTYEIGHTSIXTY LLC SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10111 SKAT v. THE HAWK GROUP PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10112 SKAT v. THE HIBISCUS PARTNERS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10113 SKAT v. THE MAPLE ADVISORS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10114 SKAT v. ONEZEROFIVE LLC SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10115 SKAT v. THE ROBIN DANIEL PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10116 SKAT v. THE SEA BRIGHT ADVISORS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10117 SKAT v. THE TAG REALTY ADVISORS LLC 401K, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10118 SKAT v. THE THROCKMORTON REALTY ADVISORS 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10119 SKAT v. ACORN CAPITAL CORPORATION EMPLOYEE PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10464 SKAT v. CAMBRIDGE WAY LLC 401K PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10465 SKAT v. THE DINK14 LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10466 SKAT v. JML CAPITAL LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10468 SKAT v. NATOLI MANAGEMENT PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10469 SKAT v. NOVA FONTA TRADING LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10470 SKAT v. THE SKYBAX LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10592

-9- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 13 of 24

Southern District of New York

IN RE SKAT TAX REFUND SCHEME LITIGATION, C.A. No. 1:18!04047 SKAT v. THE DMR PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04049 SKAT v. THE HOUSTON ROCCO LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04050 SKAT v. THE PROPER PACIFIC LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04051 SKAT v. THE LBR CAPITAL PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04052 SKAT v. THE ATLANTIC DHR 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04430 SKAT v. THE STOR CAPITAL CONSULTING LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04434 SKAT v. THE BUSBY BLACK 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04522 SKAT v. THE CANADA ROCK LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04531 SKAT v. THE ISDB PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04536 SKAT v. THE MONIN AMPER PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04538 SKAT v. THE NYC STANISMORE PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04541 SKAT v. THE TEXAS ROCCO LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04543 SKAT v. SANFORD VILLA PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04767 SKAT v. THE ASTON ADVISORS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04770 SKAT v. THE SECTOR 230 LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04771 SKAT v. RAUBRITTER LLC PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04833 SKAT v. THE M2F WELLNESS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04890 SKAT v. THE MPQ HOLDINGS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04892 SKAT v. STERLING ALPHA LLC 401K PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04894 SKAT v. THE TKKJ LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04896 SKAT v. NYCATX LLC SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04898 SKAT v. SANDER GERBER PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04899 SKAT v. ACKVIEW SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04900 SKAT v. THE DOSMON BLY PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05045 SKAT v. THE GOLDSTEIN LAW GROUP PC 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05053 SKAT v. THE INDIA BOMBAY LLC 401K PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05057 SKAT v. THE ARIA PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05147 SKAT v. THE BELFORTE PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05150 SKAT v. THE BRAVOS ADVISORS 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05151 SKAT v. THE COSTELLO ADVISORS PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05158 SKAT v. THE ESKIN PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05164 SKAT v. THE FIELDCREST PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05180 SKAT v. THE WESTPORT ADVISORS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05183

-10- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 14 of 24

SKAT v. THE KODIAK CAPITAL PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05185 SKAT v. THE KYBER PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05186 SKAT v. THE LERICI CAPITAL PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05188 SKAT v. THE LUDLOW HOLDINGS 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05189 SKAT v. THE REGOLETH PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05190 SKAT v. THE SABA CAPITAL LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05192 SKAT v. THE WEST RIVER PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05193 SKAT v. THE STARK PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05194 SKAT v. THE PETKOV PARTNERS PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05299 SKAT v. THE PETKOV MANAGEMENT LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05300 SKAT v. THE SVP 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05305 SKAT v. THE KRABI HOLDINGS LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05307 SKAT v. THE SPKK LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05308 SKAT v. THE KASV GROUP PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05309 SKAT v. DEL MAR ASSET MANAGEMENT SAVING & RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05374

Southern District of Ohio

SKAT v. THE BELLA CONSULTANTS PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00309 SKAT v. THE MUELLER INVESTMENTS PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00310 SKAT v. THE GREEN GROUP SITE PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00311 SKAT v. THE SINCLAIR PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00351

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

SKAT v. NEWSONG FELLOWSHIP CHURCH 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!02459

Southern District of Texas

CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK v. BLACKRAIN PEGASUS LLC SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01889 CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK v. GYOS 23 LLC SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01895 CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK v. THE OAK TREE ONE 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01897 CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK v. THE JOANNE E. BRADLEY SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01898

-11- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 15 of 24

CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK v. DELGADO FOX LLC SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01899 CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK v. PEGASUS FOX 23 LLC SOLO 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01900

District of Utah

SKAT v. DW CONSTRUCTION, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00452 SKAT v. KAMCO INVESTMENTS, INC. PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00454 SKAT v. KAMCO LP PROFIT SHARING PENSION PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00455 SKAT v. LINDEN ASSOCIATES DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00456 SKAT v. MOIRA ASSOCIATES LLC 401K PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00458 SKAT v. RIVERSIDE ASSOCIATES DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00460

MDL No. 2866 ! IN RE: LUCA INTERNATIONAL GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Lei (Lily) Lei to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of California

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LUCA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:15!03101

Southern District of Texas

RANDY WILLIAMS, TRUSTEE OF THE LUCA LIQUIDATING TRUST v. LEI (LILY) LEI, ET AL., Bky. Advy. No. 4:17!03375

MDL No. 2867 ! IN RE: LOCAL TV ADVERTISING ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiff Clay, Massey & Associates, P.C. to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois:

Northern District of Illinois

CLAY, MASSEY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. v. GRAY TELEVISION, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05197

-12- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 16 of 24

District of Maryland

LAW OFFICES OF PETER MILLER, P.A. v. SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02316

MDL No. 2868 ! IN RE: LINEAR GADOLINIUM!BASED CONTRAST AGENTS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Hilary Davis; Srihari Munnuru; Susan Fischer; Kathleen Geisse, Ph.D., et al.; Patricia Young; Beth Winkler; Gena Norris, et al.; Debra Javens; Marcia Sabol; Nikki Esserman; Gail Montani; Stephen Goodell; Denise McGrath; Marcin Zelazny; Lori Combs; Sean Miller; and Dawn Walton to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts:

District of Arizona

DAVIS v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01157 MUNNURU v. GUERBET LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01159 FISCHER v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01778

Northern District of California

GEISSE, ET AL. v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:17!07026 YOUNG v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00811 WINKLER v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!03077 LEWIS v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!04146

District of Delaware

JAVENS v. GE HEALTHCARE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01030

Middle District of Florida

SABOL v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00850

-13- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 17 of 24

Southern District of Florida

ESSERMAN v. BRACCO DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!21396 MONTANI v. BRACCO DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!10054

District of Kansas

GERRITY, ET AL. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02245

District of Massachusetts

GOODELL v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10694 VIRUET v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!11611

Eastern District of New York

MCGRATH v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02134

Southern District of New York

ZELAZNY v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!03246

Northern District of Ohio

COMBS v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00802

Southern District of Ohio

WHITE v. GE HEALTHCARE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!00212 MILLER v. GE HEALTHCARE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00113

District of Oregon

WALTON v. GE HEALTHCARE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00605

Southern District of Texas

NORRIS, ET AL. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!02762

-14- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 18 of 24

MDL No. 2869 ! IN RE: COMPLYRIGHT CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Robert Bohannon, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Southern District of Florida

BOHANNON, ET AL. v. COMPLYRIGHT, INC., C.A. No. 0:18!61730 ROBERTS v. COMPLYRIGHT, INC., C.A. No. 0:18!61836

Northern District of Illinois

WINSTEAD v. COMPLYRIGHT, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!04990

District of Nevada

MORELLO v. COMPLYRIGHT, INC., C.A. No. 2:18!01480

-15- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 19 of 24

SECTION B MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR CONSIDERATION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2591 ! IN RE: SYNGENTA AG MIR162 CORN LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Kenneth P. Kellogg, et al., for reconsideration of the Panel’s ruling transferring the following action to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas:

District of Minnesota

KELLOGG, ET AL. v. WATTS GUERRA, LLP, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01082

MDL No. 2670 ! IN RE: PACKAGED SEAFOOD PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiff Bryan Anthony Reo to transfer of the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California:

Northern District of Ohio

REO v. BUMBLE BEE FOODS, LLC, C.A. No. 1:18!01415 REO v. CHICKEN OF THE SEA INTERNATIONAL, C.A. No. 1:18!01477 REO v. STARKIST CO., C.A. No. 1:18!01518

MDL No. 2672 ! IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL" MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Carlos Castellucci to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Eastern District of Virginia

CASTELLUCCI v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!00863

-16- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 20 of 24

MDL No. 2738 ! IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Thomas Rafferty and Cynthia Gibson, et al., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey:

Northern District of Illinois

RAFFERTY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!04199

Eastern District of Missouri

GIBSON, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01100

MDL No. 2775 ! IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Lori Spellman to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland:

District of Arizona

SPELLMAN v. SMITH & NEPHEW INCORPORATED, C.A. No. 3:16!08080

MDL No. 2792 ! IN RE: SAMSUNG TOP!LOAD WASHING MACHINE MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiffs Colleen Kennedy, et al., and Mitchell Orenstein, to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma:

District of New Jersey

KENNEDY, ET AL. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., C.A. No. 2:14!04987 ORENSTEIN v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., C.A. No. 2:15!04054

-17- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 21 of 24

MDL No. 2795 ! IN RE: CENTURYLINK SALES PRACTICES AND SECURITIES LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Neil TS Flanders; Tim Ault; and Michael Barbee, et al., and defendants CenturyLink, Inc.; Glen F. Post III; David D. Cole; Sunit S. Patel; Jeffrey K. Storey; Virginia Boulet; Peter C. Brown; Steven T. Clontz; T. Michael Glenn; W. Bruce Hanks; Mary L. Landrieu; Harvey P. Perry; Laurie A. Siegel; R. Stewart Ewing, Jr.; Martha H. Bejar; Michael J. Roberts; and Kevin P. Chilton to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota:

Western District of Louisiana

FLANDERS v. POST, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00753 AULT v. POST, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00755 BARBREE, ET AL. v. BEJAR, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00870

MDL No. 2800 ! IN RE: EQUIFAX, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and opposition of defendant Equifax Inc., to remand, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), of the Casper action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina:

Central District of California

KEROBYAN v. EQUIFAX INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!05401 ANDRUSS, ET AL. v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00943 ABDELRAZZAQ, ET AL. v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00945 ANDERSON, ET AL. v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00950 BREVEARD v. EQUIFAX INC., C.A. No. 8:18!00952 ACHERONTI, ET AL. v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00955 BELL, ET AL. v. EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00956 BERRY v. EQUIFAX INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!00957

Northern District of Georgia

CASPER v. EQUIFAX, INC., C.A. No. 1:18!1511 (M.D. North Carolina, C.A. No. 1:17!01004)

Southern District of Illinois

WEDDINGTON v. EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., C.A. No. 3:18!01380

-18- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 22 of 24

District of New Jersey

POTENTE v. EQUIFAX INFO. SERVICES, LLC, C.A. No. 2:18!10489

Eastern District of New York

LEE v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, C.A. No. 1:18!03133

Southern District of Texas

COWHERD v. EQUIFAX, INC., C.A. No. 4:18!02230

MDL No. 2804 ! IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION

Oppositions of certain plaintiffs and defendants Curtis V. Cooper Primary Health Care, Inc.; Pembroke Pharmacy, Inc.; and Willie C. Conley, Jr., RPH to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio:

Middle District of Florida

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00751

Northern District of Florida

LEVY COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00100

Southern District of Florida

PALM BEACH COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 9:18!80749

Southern District of Georgia

BOLTON, ET AL. v. BYNES, JR, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00136

District of New Jersey

THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!10842 MONMOUTH COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!10901

District of South Carolina

COUNTY OF ANDERSON v. RITE AID OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!01947

-19- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 23 of 24

Western District of Wisconsin

RED CLIFF BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00380

MDL No. 2841 ! IN RE: MONAT HAIR CARE PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Monat Global Corp., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

District of Nevada

MONAT GLOBAL CORP. v. MILLER, C.A. No. 2:18!00324

MDL No. 2843 ! IN RE: FACEBOOK, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY USER PROFILE LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff People of the State of Illinois, ex rel. Kimberly M. Foxx to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of Illinois

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, EX REL. KIMBERLY M. FOXX v. FACEBOOK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!02667

-20- Case MDL No. 2591 Document 795 Filed 08/16/18 Page 24 of 24

RULE 11.1: HEARING SESSIONS AND ORAL ARGUMENT

(i) The parties affected by a motion to transfer may agree to waive oral argument. The Panel will take this into consideration in determining the need for oral argument.

(i) the dispositive issue(s) have been authoritatively decided; or (ii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

Unless otherwise ordered, the Panel shall consider all other matters, such as a motion for reconsideration, upon the basis of the pleadings.

November 29, 2018 Case MDL No. 2874 Document 25 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HEARING SESSION ORDER AND ATTACHED SCHEDULE FILED OCTOBER 11, 2018

IT IS ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and attached Schedule for the hearing session on November 29, 2018, in New York, New York, filed by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on October 11, 2018, are amended to update the following matter on Section A of the Schedule.

MDL No. 2874 - IN RE: RAH Color Technologies LLC Patent Litigation:

Strike the following from Northern District of Illinois:

RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Xerox Corporation, C.A. No. 1:17-06813

and insert the following under Western District of New York:

RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Xerox Corporation, C.A. No. 6:18-06746

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 875 Document 10144 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. VI) Hoffeditz, et al. v. AM General, LLC, et al., ) E.D. Pennsylvania, C.A. No. 2:09-70103 ) MDL No. 875 (D. New Jersey, C.A. No. 2:09-00257) )

ORDER LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER AND VACATING THE NOVEMBER 29, 2018, HEARING SESSION ORDER

A conditional remand order was filed in this action on September 10, 2018. Prior to expiration of that order’s 7-day stay of transmittal, defendants Ford Motor Company and ArvinMeritor, Inc., filed notices of opposition to the proposed remand and subsequent motions and brief to vacate the conditional remand order. The Panel has now been advised that defendants wish to withdraw their oppositions to remand.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay of the Panel's conditional remand order filed on September 10, 2018, is LIFTED insofar as it relates to this action. The action is remanded to the District of New Jersey.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and the attached Schedule filed on October 11, 2018, are VACATED insofar as they relate to this matter.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

NOTICE OF HEARING SESSION

DATE OF HEARING SESSION: November 29, 2018

LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse Ceremonial Courtroom No. 9C, 9th Floor 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007

SCHEDULED MATTERS: Matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session are listed on the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session.

ORAL ARGUMENT:

- 2 -

For those matters listed on Section A of the Schedule, the "Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument" must be filed in this office no later than November 9, 2018. The procedures governing Panel oral argument (Panel Rule 11.1) are attached. The Panel strictly adheres to these procedures.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel cc: Clerk, United States District for the Southern District of New York Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 3 of 16

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

HEARING SESSION ORDER

The Panel issues the following orders in connection with its next hearing session,

IT IS ORDERED that on November 29, 2018, the Panel will convene a hearing session in New York, New York, to consider the matters on the attached Schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1407.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Panel may, on its own initiative, consider transfer of any or all of the actions in those matters to any district or districts.

PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

______Sarah S. Vance Chair

Marjorie O. Rendell Charles R. Breyer Lewis A. Kaplan Ellen Segal Huvelle R. David Proctor Catherine D. Perry Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 4 of 16

SCHEDULE OF MATTERS FOR HEARING SESSION November 29, 2018 !! New York, New York

SECTION A MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 2870 ! IN RE: PATRIOT NATIONAL, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Aric McIntire, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida:

Southern District of Florida

MCINTIRE, ET AL. v. MARIANO, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!60075 KANIKI v. MARIANO, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!62097

Southern District of New York

GINGELLO v. PATRIOT NATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01866 KAYCE v. PATRIOT NATIONAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!07164

MDL No. 2871 ! IN RE: DRY BEAN REVENUE PROTECTION CROP INSURANCE LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs Ackerman & Son LLC, et al., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan:

Eastern District of Michigan

ACKERMAN, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!11779

District of Minnesota

ELBERT, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:18!01574 Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 5 of 16

MDL No. 2872 ! IN RE: INFANTS BORN OPIOID-DEPENDENT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motion of plaintiffs to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois:

Northern District of Ohio

REES, ET AL. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!45252 WOOD v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!45264 SALMONS, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!45268 AMBROSIO, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!45375 FLANAGAN, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!45405 HUNT v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!45681

Southern District of West Virginia

MOORE, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01231

MDL No. 2873 ! IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Motions of defendants Tyco Fire Products LP; Chemguard, Inc.; and 3M Company to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

Northern District of Alabama

WEST MORGAN!EAST LAWRENCE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:15!01750 TENNESSEE RIVERKEEPER INC. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:16!01029 KING, ET AL. v. WEST MORGAN!EAST LAWRENCE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:17!01833 ARNOLD v. WEST MORGAN!EAST LAWRENCE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!01441

District of Colorado

BELL, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!02351 BELL, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!02352 DAVIS, ET AL. v. 3M CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!02394

-2- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 6 of 16

ADAMS, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00705 BRAUN, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00742 GORDON, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01065 SMITH, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01070 PARKER, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01090 MANN, JR., ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01091 BLEICHERT, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01101 GUTIERRES, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01140 RODERICK, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01145 CHISHOLM, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01152 GOKEY, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01153 SMITH, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01154 WOLFE, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01155 THOMAS, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01156 THOMPSON, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01157 KAHLER, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01158 BARKER, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01161 HICKS, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01163 BUTTS, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01164 HUTCHISON, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01165 INGEMANSEN, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01167 RICE, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01190 HARTLEY, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01191 HELM, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01192 STACY, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01193 CROW, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01196 PADILLA, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01199 TAYLOR, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01201 DILWOOD, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01202 SHERBAN, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01270 JOHNSON, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01271 GUTTENBERG, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01274 CASTRO, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01278 OQUENDO, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01281 GARCIA, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01282 MCCLOSKEY, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01285 NISKERN, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01288 GIBSON, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01294 HALL, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01298 KELLY, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01301 WALKER, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!01302

-3- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 7 of 16

District of Delaware

ANDERSON, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00769

Northern District of Florida

EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!01445

District of Massachusetts

TOWN OF BARNSTABLE v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!12351 BARNSTABLE COUNTY v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!40002 CIVITARESE, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!10747 CITY OF WESTFIELD v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!30027

Western District of Michigan

ZIMMERMAN, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01062

District of Minnesota

CITY OF LAKE ELMO v. 3M COMPANY, C.A. No. 0:16!02557

Eastern District of New York

GREEN, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!02566 SINGER, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!06962 SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!06982 AYO, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00373 HAMPTON BAYS WATER DISTRICT v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01996 SHIPMAN v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02496 PY, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!03225

Northern District of New York

LUCEY v. SAINT!GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01054 WICKENDEN, ET AL. v. SAINT!GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01056

-4- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 8 of 16

ANDRICK, ET AL. v. SAINT!GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORP., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:17!01058

Southern District of New York

ADAMO, ET AL. v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, ET AL., C.A. No. 7:17!07131 FOGARTY, ET AL. v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, ET AL., C.A. No. 7:17!07134 MILLER, ET AL. v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, ET AL., C.A. No. 7:17!07136 CITY OF NEWBURGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., C.A. No. 7:18!07057

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

BATES, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!04961 GRANDE, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!05380 YOCKEY, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!05553 FEARNLEY, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:16!06416 MENKES, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:17!00573 ZYSK, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02036 GILLEN v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02037 VOELKER, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02038 GENTLES v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02039 SATURNO v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02040 GRANDE v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02041 BURBIDGE, ET AL. v. THE 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!02043 EYNON v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!03387

Eastern District of Washington

ACKERMAN, ET AL. v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00117

MDL No. 2874 ! IN RE: RAH COLOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC PATENT LITIGATION

Motion of defendant Quad/Graphics, Inc., to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

Northern District of California

ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC. v. RAH COLOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC, C.A. No. 3:18!01612

-5- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 9 of 16

RAH COLOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., C.A. No. 3:18!03277

Northern District of Illinois

RAH COLOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. XEROX CORPORATION, C.A. No. 1:17!06813

Eastern District of Wisconsin

RAH COLOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. QUAD/GRAPHICS, INC., C.A. No. 2:18!00087

-6- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 10 of 16

SECTION B MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR CONSIDERATION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT

MDL No. 875 ! IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. VI)

Oppositions of defendants Ford Motor Company and Arvin-Meritor, Inc., to remand, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey:

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

HOFFEDITZ, ET AL. v. AM GENERAL, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:09!70103 (D. New Jersey, C.A. No. 2:09!00257)

MDL No. 2391 ! IN RE: BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of defendants Biomet, Inc.; Biomet Orthopedics, LLC; Biomet Manufacturing, LLC; and Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC, to remand, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), of the following actions to their respective transferor courts:

Northern District of Indiana

CHADWICK v. BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:12!00614 (D. New Jersey, C.A. No. 2:12!03136) CARTER v. BIOMET, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:12!00256 (S.D. New York, C.A. No. 1:13!01532) RICHARDS v. BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:14!00612 (S.D. Texas, C.A. No. 4:14!00232)

MDL No. 2437 ! IN RE: DOMESTIC DRYWALL ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania:

Northern District of Georgia

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. v. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC., C.A. No. 1:18!02839

-7- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 11 of 16

MDL No. 2738 ! IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Eleanor Barsh, et al.; Lisa Hittler, et al.; and Barbara Hinton to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey:

Eastern District of Missouri

BARSH, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01464 HITTLER, ET AL. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01474 HINTON v. PTI UNION, LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01602

MDL No. 2741 ! IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of defendant Monsanto Company to transfer of the following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California:

District of Arizona

LOPEZ v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 4:18!00360

District of Maine

POULIN v. MONSANTO COMPANY, C.A. No. 1:18!00318

MDL No. 2742 ! IN RE: SUNEDISON, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Carlos Domenech Zornoza to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:

District of Maryland

ZORNOZA v. TERRAFORM GLOBAL, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 8:18!02523

-8- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 12 of 16

MDL No. 2782 ! IN RE: ETHICON PHYSIOMESH FLEXIBLE COMPOSITE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Carlisa Nicholson to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia:

Eastern District of Arkansas

NICHOLSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00576

MDL No. 2795 ! IN RE: CENTURYLINK SALES PRACTICES AND SECURITIES LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiff Dennis Palkon and defendants CenturyLink, Inc.; Sunit S. Patel; David D. Cole;, R. Stewart Ewing, Jr.; Jeffrey K. Storey; Laurie A. Siegel; Glen F. Post III; Harvey P. Perry; Mary L. Landrieu; W. Bruce Hanks; Michael Glenn; Steven T. Clontz; Peter C. Brown; Virginia Boulet; Martha H. Bejar; Michael J. Roberts; and Kevin P. Chilton to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota:

Western District of Louisiana

PALKON v. CENTURYLINK, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00998

MDL No. 2800 ! IN RE: EQUIFAX, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs Davedia Sharmaine Lamar, Christopher J. Bordelon, and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia:

Central District of California

DAVEDIA SHARMAINE LAMAR v. EQUIFAX, INC., C.A. No. 5:18!01369

Western District of Louisiana

BORDELON v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, C.A. No. 6:18!01137

District of Puerto Rico

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO v. EQUIFAX, INC., C.A. No. 3:18!01424

-9- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 13 of 16

MDL No. 2804 ! IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION

Oppositions of plaintiffs and defendants Mark Cieniawski, M.D.; Michael B. Bruehl, M.D.; Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and Mylan N.V. to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio:

Northern District of California

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!04535

Northern District of Georgia

THE CITY OF ATLANTA v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!03508 HENRY COUNTY, GEORGIA v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!03899

Northern District of Illinois

VILLAGE OF MELROSE PARK, ET AL. v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05288 CITY OF HARVEY, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!05756

Eastern District of Kentucky

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ET AL. v. WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00126

District of Maine

CITY OF BANGOR v. PURDUE PHARMA LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00298 CITY OF PORTLAND v. PURDUE PHARMA LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00282 CITY OF LEWISTON v. PURDUE PHARMA LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00310

District of Massachusetts

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:16!10947

Eastern District of Missouri

JEFFERSON COUNTY, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!01477

-10- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 14 of 16

District of New Jersey

CAMDEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!11983

District of New Mexico

ROOSEVELT COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:18!00795

Southern District of Ohio

DOYLE v. ACTAVIS LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!00719 MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ET AL. v. CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!00295

Eastern District of Oklahoma

CHEROKEE NATION v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 6:18!00236

Northern District of Oklahoma

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, THE v. PURDE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00459 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, THE v. PURDE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00460 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, THE v. PURDE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00461 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OTTAWA COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, THE v. PURDE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 4:18!00466

Western District of Oklahoma

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARVIN COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. PURDUE PHARMA LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00820 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MCCLAIN COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. PURDE PHARMA LP, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:18!00857

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

DOE v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!03637

District of South Carolina

LEXINGTON, COUNTY OF v. RITE AID OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18!02357

-11- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 15 of 16

Southern District of West Virginia

MOORE, ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01231

MDL No. 2846 ! IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Opposition of plaintiff Linda Luks to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio:

District of Arizona

LUKS v. DAVOL INCORPORATED, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:18!01280

-12- Case MDL No. 875 Document 10139 Filed 10/11/18 Page 16 of 16

RULE 11.1: HEARING SESSIONS AND ORAL ARGUMENT

(i) The parties affected by a motion to transfer may agree to waive oral argument. The Panel will take this into consideration in determining the need for oral argument.

(i) the dispositive issue(s) have been authoritatively decided; or (ii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

Unless otherwise ordered, the Panel shall consider all other matters, such as a motion for reconsideration, upon the basis of the pleadings.