Voters in Blue: the Citizen Soldiers of the Civil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Voters in Blue: the Citizen Soldiers of the Civil VOTERS IN BLUE : THE CITIZEN SOLDIERS OF THE CIVIL WAR By T. AY WIIAMS I 86 e secioa cooesy wic a e e aio ee a ooy cii wa ega o oe a ecae e eoe o e oe saes a eae e issue wic symoie e ieeces ewee e secios — e issue o saey Downloaded from oe uic oiio was iie i is aiue owa e ecuia isiuio ee was e eae-i-aoe aiue o may emocas e ge-i-o-i-gauay oosa o cose- aie euicas a e aois-i-immeiaey ema o http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/ aica euicas a aoiioiss e gea mass o iii- uas i e o suscie i ayig quaiaie egees o ese ee ieig iewois we osiiies sae A o ese coicig aiues wee caie oe io e amies a e goeme o e Uio ceae e soy ae e wa sae e saey issue ae u aew ow e cooesy was as o wee e esucio o saey sou at :: on October 29, 2012 e mae oe o e wa aims e aica euicas emae emaciaio maskig ei ea esigs ei e o o miiay ecessiy ico e coseaie euicas a e Wa emocas eie a e esoaio o e Uio mus e e soe oecie o e wa e eace emocas cie o a uce a e ecosucio o e aio wi sou- e igs guaaee e woe couy eae e quesio Agumes a coueagumes esoue i Cogess i e ess o e sum a i cossoas soes A i e cams o e amies e oices o cooesy aose as ouy as o e ome o as e me i ue oug eay wi eac oe oe e gea issue o e ay e eea amies wee com- ose oewemigy oices a iaes o ciie soies o me aw emoaiy om ciiia ie o ig a wa ese me wee oiicias a oes i ciiia ie a ey i o se ei oiica ieas o amiios we ey oe a uiom ey coiue o ik a ak i ems o ei 8 88 THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY HISTORICAL REVIEW ewa eisece ey emaie oiicias a oes is was a aua eeome u i iese e oe amies wi ceai caaceisics a oay o oe miiay ag- gegaio ee maiese: coiua camie eae aou e wa aims o e goeme ie acioaism amog oices a ioe osiiy ewee geeas a commo soies egeee y ieeces o oiica oiios Uouey e suy Ameica sii o emocacy ouce ese ca- aceisics emocaic suc quaiies mig e u ey ie- ee seiousy wi miiay eiciecy y esoyig uiy a co-oeaio Wose a a ee seeme a imes a ossi- Downloaded from iiy a e ciie amy wou ecome so eage i aisasi a so imesse wi e coecess o is oi- ica oios a i wou seek o imose is wi uo e couy y oce o ea o oce us sueig emocaic go- eme http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/ e sii o oiics mae is is aeaace i e esoe o e oices o e amy om e egiig ays o e wa oiicias o a aies wace e miiay aoage as geeiy as ey i cii os a wi e same aisa mo- ies I uy o 86 eeseaie Wiiam A icaso o Iiois a ougas emoca comaie i e ouse a e at :: on October 29, 2012 goeme a commissioe as geeas ou me wo wee aiiae wi e eckiige wig o e ay wie o a sige aoime a goe o a ougas ma e wae e amiisaio o aao is misguie oicy e ouees wo wee ockig o e coos i e Wes wee ougas emo- cas a ey wae o e commae y ougas oices I ey wee o ey wou o suo e wa O e oe sie o e oiica ece a ae coesoe o e ew Yok rbn se i a isac o is ae aou e eoa- e emocaic comosiio o e oices o e Oio oos : "Goeo eiso as aoie o e ee-yeas seice wey-ee cooes o iay egimes wee o wom wee emocas ie euicas oe Ameica a oe wose oiica aiiaio is ukow" 2 Cnrnl Glb, Cn S 24 tnl Intllnr (Whntn l 24 86 2 New York rbn, September 1, 1861. OES I UE: CIIE SOIES O E CII WA 8 I e is yea o e wa e gea maoiy o e geea oices wee emocas isgue euicas esimae a eigy o e 0 igaie geeas a ou-is o a e igaie a mao geeas eoge o e oosiio ay e ee mos imoa commas wee e y emo- caic geeas : Geoge McCea ey W aeck a o Caos ue e age ume o emocas i e ige aks was e esu o isoica accie Mos o e geea oices wee Wes oi gauaes a mos o e Wes oies aee o e emocas u e siuaio agee a aame euica eaes ey a isuig isios o Downloaded from e emocaic mases o e amy macig ei oss o Wasigo o oeow e amiisaio ey susece may o e emocaic geeas o ouisig a sece sym- ay wi e Sou a o acig easoae as o e- http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/ e a Uio icoy 4 Ae 862 e euicas eae a ie easie McCea a ue wee emoe om comma a may oe esse emocaic oices me e same ae o wee eegae o uimoa osiios e aica eu- icas oug aou e owa o a ume o emocas y ceaig e oweu Cogessioa agecy e Commiee o e Couc o e Wa wic aoe uceasigy o oiso at :: on October 29, 2012 icos mi agais a oices o emocaic ai 5 ee- eess a age ooio o emocas emaie amog e geeas a ui e e o e wa ese me wee eouce iey y euica ewsaes a eee aey y emocaic oes e ess wa oe e geeas assumes a saig sigii- cace we oe ememes a e ewsaes cicuae eey i e amy a wee ea o oy y e oices cocee a 3 Seao ey Wiso Congressional Globe, Cog 2 Sess 64 eesea- ie Mai Coway ibid., 8 eeseaie Geoge W uia Speeches on Political Questions: 1850-1868 (ew Yok 82 202-204 eeseaie usi S Moi quoe i ew Yok Tribune, May 2 862 4 ose Mei o Ewi M Sao auay 2 862 Edwin M. Stanton Papers, iay o Cogess Ca Scu o Aaam ico oeme 8 20 862 eeick aco (e Speeches, Correspondence, and Political Papers of Carl Schurz (6 os ew Yok I 20-20 26- uy o o Sema auay 0 86 John Sherman Papers, iay o Cogess 5 ay Wiiams " e Commiee o e Couc o e Wa" The Journal of the American Military Institute (Wasigo C III -6 0 E MISSISSII AEY ISOICA EIEW ei ies u aso y e commo soies wo see ue em aica euica eios cosay ue e ugy cage a emocaic geeas symaie wi e Sou a i o wa o eea e Coeeacy "ey wa o sae e uio i suc mae as o o u is eay assaias is imacae oes" eaie oace Geeey "ece ey sike iesouey uiousy ieeciey ey wai o e assue a ei ow wi o eac oo a ui e ime o sikig as asse" 6 e aica ouas emae e isgace a emoa o eey oice wo oose emaciaio as a aim o e wa Ui is was oe emocaic easo wou o Downloaded from ack e amies a e ay o icoy 7 Some emocas e aicas aise sou e cou-maiae a eecue "e sooig o a a oe imecies a semi-aios wose soues gise wi sie sas wou sae seams o http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/ ecious eia oo" woe e ew Yok rbn Was- igo coesoe e emocaic aes eie o e aica cages wi coueaccusaios a e euicas wae o ou om e amy a e caae Wes oies a u i ei aces icomee euica oiica ge- eas Wa mus ae ee e eacios o e eise me wo ea a ei commaes wee aios o oos e at :: on October 29, 2012 eec o moae a isciie ca e imagie e saey issue iie euica a emocaic oices io iey osie acios Oe euica cooe woe i- igay o is wie : "Yeseay I a quie a Sa wi e C ais — ou iissio [] Commae — e is a osaey Geea a e is ow o e Aoiioiss I a some ai ak wi im a o im wa I oug o osaey Ge- eas — I ae o goo eeig o im a I ae mae u my 6 ew Yok Independent, Ai 86 7 New Yok Tribune, auay 862 eioia ibid., uy 2 862 oso coesoece ibid., Augus 862 amy coesoece ibid., Seeme 2 862 eioia ibid., auay 22 86 eioia ibid., euay 2 86 os- o Traveler, quoe i eoi Free Press, auay 86 ew Yok Independent, May 26 864 Wilkes' Spirit of the Times (New Yok Ocoe eceme 2 86 a Mac 26 Ai 2 864 8 ew Yok Tribune, eceme 862 2 9 ew Yok World, auay 86 eoi Free Press, auay 24 86 ew Yr Journal of Commerce, td n ibid., nr 2 86 OES I UE : CIIE SOIES O E CII WA 191 mi a I wi o go io aoe ae ue is com- ma" 4 euica oices cosay woe ees o ei Cogess- me eoucig emocas ue wom ey see o ei oosiio o emaciaio a emaig a Cogess oce e emoa o suc oices a secue e aoime o goo euicas i ei aces" Oices wo wae omoio o wo e a ei meis a ee sige asee o assue iueia euica oiicias a ey wee ig o e saey issue A geea wose seimes a ee quesioe woe o Seceay o Wa Ewi M Sao: "My maim as Downloaded from aways ee o eace wi saey a my oiio is a eace o ay oe ems is ow imossie" 13 Someimes ies o a asiig oice wou wie o euica Co- gessme o ouc o e oices euicaism A ew Yok http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/ ake ugig a omoio o Geea o M Scoie o Seao Wiiam essee ae aisig Scoies mii- ay aiiies "I ca aswe o im o e saey quesio oo e is a aoiiois a emaciaiois" " I e is a o e wa euica oices e iey a ei meis wee igoe a ei omoios e ack ey ame is o icos acice o aig ou imoa at :: on October 29, 2012 commas o emocas i oe o aac memes o a ay o e suo o e wa a o e McCea-ue co- o o e amy 15 Woe oe isgue euica geea o 0 as C eg o Ms eg auay 2 86 eooe C Iege (e h Civil War Letters of Colonel Hans Christian.
Recommended publications
  • General Joseph “Fightin' Joe” Wheeler
    General Joseph “Fightin’ Joe” Wheeler By Wil Elrick September 10, 1836 was an ordinary day that saw the birth of an ordinary child in Augusta, Georgia. The boy was the youngest of four children born to Joseph and Julia Hull Wheeler. The name bestowed upon the ordinary child would go on to be known throughout the United States as that of an excellent soldier and statesman – that name was Joseph Wheeler. In addition to an unremarkable birth, Joseph went through his early life in a similar ordinary state. Joseph senior was a merchant banker and landowner who had built for himself a small fortune only General to see it all taken away in the bank Joseph “Fightin” Joe” Wheeler failures and financial panic of 1837. (Wikipedia) Soon after the family’s fortune was received his appointment to West lost, Julie unexpectedly passed Point at the age of seventeen. away. Unable to raise the young boy On July 1, 1854, Joseph Wheeler on his own, Joseph senior sent entered West Point which at the Joseph to Connecticut to live with time was under Superintendent his two aunts and attend the Robert E. Lee. While at West Point, Cheshire Academy boarding school Joseph Wheeler was once again in 1842. considered unremarkable. He had There is little recorded about his very high scores in the subject of time at Cheshire, but he did seem to Deportment, but otherwise, he was be an average youth who enjoyed in the bottom of his class during his reading about wars and learning five years at the military academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactical Errors: Union and Confederate Armies Were Hampered by Atlanta's Landscape
    Civil War Book Review Winter 2001 Article 25 Tactical Errors: Union And Confederate Armies Were Hampered By Atlanta's Landscape Philip L. Secrist Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Secrist, Philip L. (2001) "Tactical Errors: Union And Confederate Armies Were Hampered By Atlanta's Landscape," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol3/iss1/25 Secrist: Tactical Errors: Union And Confederate Armies Were Hampered By At Review TACTICAL ERRORS Union and Confederate armies were hampered by Atlanta's landscape Secrist, Philip L. Winter 2001 McMurry, Richard M. Atlanta 1864: Last Chance for the Confederacy. University of Nebraska Press, 2000-08-01. ISBN 803232128 In Atlanta 1864, Richard McMurry ably retraces the familiar scholarly analysis of Confederate command interplay during the Atlanta campaign, in which wartime field tent strategies collided with the long distance meddling of Richmond. Disappointingly, nothing fresh and new rises from McMurry's effort. In the author's account of the depressing and petty quarrelling among Confederate generals and leaders during Atlanta's defense - a saga that features Joseph E. Johnston, John Bell Hood, William J. Hardee, Braxton Bragg, and Jefferson Davis - Johnston takes the biggest "hit." He earns much of the criticism he gets, especially when his style of leadership is compared against the tactical daring of Lee in Virginia. McMurry does his usual scholarly work in this regard and his case is strong. Where Atlanta 1864 suffers most is McMurry's failure to appreciate how command decisions were influenced by topography, undergrowth, other natural landscape features (rivers and small streams), incomplete or incorrect information, and extremely poor roads along the 100-mile route of the Atlanta campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Failure of the Chicago School of Antitrust Mark Glick
    Antitrust and Economic History: The Historic Failure of the Chicago School of Antitrust Mark Glick1 Working Paper No. 95 May 2019 ABSTRACT This paper presents an historical analysis of the antitrust laws. Its central contention is that the history of antitrust can only be understood in light of U.S. economic history and the succession of dominant economic policy regimes that punctuated that history. The antitrust laws and a subset of other related policies have historically focused on the negative consequences resulting from the rise, expansion, and dominance of big business. Antitrust specifically uses competition as its tool to address these problems. The paper traces the evolution of the emergence, growth and expansion of big business over six economic eras: the Gilded Age, the Progressive Era, the New Deal, the post-World War II Era, the 1970s, and the era of neoliberalism. It considers three policy regimes: laissez-faire during the Gilded Age and the Progressive Era, the New Deal, policy regime from the Depression through the early 1970s, and the neoliberal policy regime that dominates today and includes the Chicago School of antitrust. The principal conclusion of the paper is that the activist antitrust policies associated with the New Deal that existed from the late 1 Professor, Department of Economics, University of Utah. Email: [email protected]. I would like to thank members of the University of Utah Competition Group, Catherine Ruetschlin, Marshall Steinbaum, and Ted Tatos for their help and input. I also benefited from suggestions and guidance from Gérard Duménil’s 2019 seminar on economic history at the University of Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Lincoln Papers
    Abraham Lincoln papers 1 From Abraham Lincoln to Henry W. Halleck [Draft] , February 16, 1862 1 Fort Donelson in Tennessee fell unconditionally to Ulysses Grant early on February 16, giving the Union its first decisive victory in the West. In exultation but also some apprehension, Lincoln here displays his early passion for military detail by counseling Halleck, in command at St. Louis, about what threats faced him next, and what next moves he ought to make. He also urges joint action on the part of Halleck and Don Carlos Buell, in command at Louisville, as he had done previously. See Lincoln to Buell, January 6, 1862, January 7, 1862, January 13, 1862. Executive Mansion, Washington, Feb. 16, 1862 You have Fort Donelson safe, unless Grant shall be overwhelmed from outside, to prevent which latter will, I think, require all the vigilence, energy, and skill of yourself & Buell, acting in full co- 2 operation. Columbus will not get at Grant, but the the force from Bowling-Green will— They hold the Railroad from Bowling-Green to within a few miles of Donelson, with the Bridge at Clarksburg 3 undisturbed— It is unsafe to rely that they will not dare to expose Nashville to Buell. A small part of their force can retreat slowly towards Nashville, breaking up the Railroad as they go, and keep Buell out of that City twenty days— Mean time Nashville will be abundently defended by forces from 4 all South & perhaps from here at Manassas— Could not a cavalry force from Gen. Thomas on the upper Cumberland, dash across, almost unresisted, at and cut the Railroad at or near Knoxville, Tenn.? In the midst of a bombardment at Donnelson, why could not a Gun-boat run up and destroy the Bridge at Clarksburg? Our success or failure at Donnelson is vastly important; and I beg you to put your soul in the effort— I send a copy to Buell— 2 Confederate forces at Columbus and Bowling Green, Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Gen. Braxton Bragg and Two Texas Ghost Stories
    Gen. Braxton Bragg and Two Texas Ghost Stories Norman Dasinger, Jr., August 7, 2020 blueandgrayeducation.org Braxton Bragg grew up in North Carolina. The rumor was that his mother was in prison for killing a free Black man, and she gave birth to him there. Young Braxton was a smart boy. He managed to get to the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, and he graduated fifth in the 1837 class. He served bravely in the Mexican War and returned to his hometown a hero receiving cheers from the very people that had maligned him for his family history while growing up Soon, he met the daughter of a rich Louisiana sugar cane plantation owner, Eliza Ellis. They were married, and Bragg decided to leave the army. He resigned and moved to Thibodaux and bought a 1,600-acre sugar cane plantation of his own. He used his superior talents of organization to make the endeavor profitable When Louisiana seceded from the United States, Braxton Bragg Bragg was made a brigadier general in the new Confederate States Army and commanded the Department of West Florida headquartered in Pensacola. Following the battle of Shiloh, he was made a full general and given command of the Army of Tennessee. He led a campaign into Kentucky, and his soldiers fought at the battles of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, and Chickamauga, Georgia. By December 1863, Bragg was removed from army command and given an advisory role in Richmond’s War Department. On May 9, 1865, Bragg was captured near Monticello, Georgia, and upon his release he moved into his brother’s house in Lowndesboro, Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • John W. Foster, Soldier and Politician by DANIELW
    John W. Foster, Soldier and Politician By DANIELW. SNEPP Indiana’s sons have occupied a number of important gov- ernmental offices in Washington and diplomatic posts abroad. No Hoosier, however, has served his country longer or more faithfully than John Watson Foster. His public life spans a half century of diplomatic conflict in which the United States rose to the undisputed position of a world power. In the pres- ent generation, few, except students of diplomatic history and international law, have heard the name of John W. Foster or read his scholarly works on diplomacy and world peace. No published biography has yet recorded his achievements and no monument has been raised to perpetuate his memory. Nevertheless this obscure man was regarded by Ambassador James Bryce as “the most distinguished diplomat of our time,” and by Secretary of State Frelinghuysen as the most valuable man in foreign service in his day. Mr. Foster represented the United States upon more different missions of first rank than any other person, and was accordingly called by Chauncey M. DePew, “the handy-man of the State Department.” Andrew Johnson excepted, Foster served in one capacity or another under every president from Abraham Lincoln to Theodore Roosevelt. Diplomacy was to Foster not merely a calling, it was a profession. This article, however, is concerned only with that part of his life spent in Indiana. Foster’s English ancestry may be traced to the hardy tradespeople on his mother’s side and to the staunch yeoman class on his father’s side. The strain of the depression which followed on the heels of the Napoleonic Wars in England, fell most severely upon the middle class, great numbers of whom migrated to America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crime Against Kansas. the Apologies for The
    THE CHIME AGAINST KANSAS. THE APOLOGIES FOR THE CRIME, THE TRUE REMEDY. SPEECH OF HON. CHARLES SUMNER, IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES, 19th and 20th May, 1856. BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY JOHN P. JEWETT & COMPANY. CLEYELAND, OHIO: . JEWETT, PROCTOR & WORTHINGTON. NEW YOKE: SHELDON, BLAEEMAN & CO. 1856. /? (^ /Lo.^-, - ^'^<^'^^ THE CRIME AGAIKST KANSAS. THE APOLOaiES FOK THE CRIME. THE TRUE REMEDY. SPEECH OF HON. CHARLES SUMNEE, IN T H S SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES, 19th and 20th May, 1856. BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY JOHN P. JEWETT & COMPANY. CLEVELAND, OHIO: JEWETT, PROCTOR, & WORTHINGTON. NEW YORK : SHELDON, BLAKEMAN & CO 1856. In the Senate, 13th March, 1856, Mr, Douglas, from the Committee on Territories, presented and read a very long Report on affairs in Kansas. Mr. CoLLAMER also presented and read a Minority Report. As soon as the reading was completed, Mr. Sumner took the floor, and made the following remarks : ]Mr. Somner. In those two reports, the whole subject is presented character- istically on both sides. In the report of the majority, the true issue is smoth- ered ; in that of the minority, the true issue stands forth as a pillar of fire to guide the country. The first report proceeds from four senators ; but against it I put, fearlessly, the report signed by a single senator [Mr. Collamer], to whom I offer my thanks for this service. Let the two go abroad together. Error is harmless, while reason is left free to combat it. I have no desire to precipitate the debate on this important question, under which the country already shakes from side to side, and which threatens to scatter from its folds civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lincoln- Mcclellan Relationship in Myth and Memory
    The Lincoln- McClellan Relationship in Myth and Memory MARK GRIMSLEY Like many Civil War historians, I have for many years accepted invita- tions to address the general public. I have nearly always tried to offer fresh perspectives, and these have generally been well received. But almost invariably the Q and A or personal exchanges reveal an affec- tion for familiar stories or questions. (Prominent among them is the query “What if Stonewall Jackson had been present at Gettysburg?”) For a long time I harbored a private condescension about this affec- tion, coupled with complete incuriosity about what its significance might be. But eventually I came to believe that I was missing some- thing important: that these familiar stories, endlessly retold in nearly the same ways, were expressions of a mythic view of the Civil War, what the amateur historian Otto Eisenschiml memorably labeled “the American Iliad.”1 For Eisenschiml “the American Iliad” was merely a clever title for a compendium of eyewitness accounts of the conflict, but I take the term seriously. In Homer’s Iliad the anger of Achilles, the perfidy of Agamemnon, the doomed gallantry of Hector—and the relationships between them—have enormous, uncontested, unchanging, and almost primal symbolic meaning. So too do certain figures in the American Iliad. Prominent among these are the butcher Grant, the Christ-like Lee, and the rage- filled Sherman. I believe that the traditional Civil War narrative functions as a national myth of central importance to our understanding of ourselves as Americans. And like the classic mythologies of old, it contains timeless wisdom about what it means to be a human being.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862
    Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862 Table of Contents User Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Container List Processed by Emily Hershman 27 June 2011 Thomas Balch Library 208 W. Market Street Leesburg, VA 20176 USER INFORMATION VOLUME OF COLLECTION: 2 folders COLLECTION DATES: 1862 PROVENANCE: W. Roger Smith, Midland, TX. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS: Collection open for research USE RESTRICTIONS: No physical characteristics affect use of this material. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained in writing from Thomas Balch Library. CITE AS: W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection, 1862 (SC 0084), Thomas Balch Library, Leesburg, VA. ALTERNATE FORMATS: None OTHER FINDING AIDS: None TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: None RELATED HOLDINGS: None ACCESSION NUMBERS: 1995.0046 NOTES: Formerly filed in Thomas Balch Library Vertical Files 2 HISTORICAL SKETCH From its organization in July 1861, the Army of the Potomac remained the primary Union military force in the East, confronting General Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) Army of Northern Virginia in a series of battles and skirmishes. In the early years of the Civil War, however, the Army of the Potomac suffered defeats at the Battle of the First Bull Run in 1861, the Peninsula Campaign and the Battle of Fredericksburg in 1862, as well as the Battle of Chancellorsville in 1863. Historians attribute its initial lack of victories to poor leadership from a succession of indecisive generals: Irvin McDowell (1818-1885), George McClellan (1826-1885), Ambrose Burnside (1824-1881), and Joseph Hooker (1814-1879). When General George Meade (1815-1872) took command of the Army of the Potomac in June 1863, he was successful in pushing the Army of Northern Virginia out of Pennsylvania following the Battle of Gettysburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Sumner (1811–1874)
    Charles Sumner (1811–1874) Charles Sumner, a U.S. senator from ith his large head, thick hair and muttonchops, and Massachusetts and a passionate aboli- broad torso, abolitionist Charles Sumner presented tionist, was born in Boston. After law school he spent time in Washington, D.C., where a powerful image. This likeness of Sumner by Walter he met with Chief Justice John Marshall and Ingalls resembles in several regards an 1860 “Impe- listened to Henry Clay debate in the Senate rial” photograph (24 x 20 inches) by Mathew Brady. Chamber. Unimpressed with the politics of The photograph, like the painting, shows Sumner facing left. His body Washington, he returned to Massachusetts, W where he practiced law, lectured at Har- is at a three-quarter angle so that the torso opens up, revealing an expanse vard Law School, and published in the of white waistcoat, watch fob, and folding eyeglasses suspended from American Jurist. Following a three-year study tour of Europe, Sumner resumed his a slender cord or chain. However, Ingalls repositioned the head into law practice with little enthusiasm. Then, profile and also placed the disproportionately short left thigh parallel in 1845, he was invited to make a public to the picture plane. The conflict of the planar head and thigh with the Independence Day speech in Boston. This event was a turning point in his career, angled torso is awkward and distracting. The profile head (with less and he soon became widely known as unruly hair than in the photograph) is, however, calm and pensive, and an eloquent orator.
    [Show full text]