Evidence for the Role of Infectious Disease in Species Extinction and Endangerment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evidence for the Role of Infectious Disease in Species Extinction and Endangerment Review Evidence for the Role of Infectious Disease in Species Extinction and Endangerment KATHERINE F. SMITH,∗‡ DOV F. SAX,∗ AND KEVIN D. LAFFERTY† ∗University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Athens, GA 30602, U.S.A. †USGS Channel Islands Field Station, University of California Santa Barbara, Marine Science Institute, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, U.S.A. Abstract: Infectious disease is listed among the top five causes of global species extinctions. However, the majority of available data supporting this contention is largely anecdotal. We used the IUCN Red List of Threatened and Endangered Species and literature indexed in the ISI Web of Science to assess the role of infectious disease in global species loss. Infectious disease was listed as a contributing factor in <4% of species extinctions known to have occurred since 1500 (833 plants and animals) and as contributing to a species’ status as critically endangered in <8% of cases (2852 critically endangered plants and animals). Although infectious diseases appear to play a minor role in global species loss, our findings underscore two important limitations in the available evidence: uncertainty surrounding the threats to species survival and a temporal bias in the data. Several initiatives could help overcome these obstacles, including rigorous scientific tests to determine which infectious diseases present a significant threat at the species level, recognition of the limitations associated with the lack of baseline data for the role of infectious disease in species extinctions, combining data with theory to discern the circumstances under which infectious disease is most likely to serve as an agent of extinction, and improving surveillance programs for the detection of infectious disease. An evidence-based understanding of the role of infectious disease in species extinction and endangerment will help prioritize conservation initiatives and protect global biodiversity. Keywords: IUCN, wildlife disease Evidencia del Papel de Enfermedades Infecciosas en la Extinci´on y Puesta en Peligro de Especies Resumen: Las enfermedades infecciosas estan´ consideradas entre las cinco causas principales de la ex- tincion´ global de especies. Sin embargo, la mayor´ıa de los datos disponibles que sustentan esta afirmacion´ son anecdoticos.´ Utilizamos la Lista Roja de Especies Amenazadas y en Peligro de la IUCN y literatura indexada en la Red ISI de Ciencia para evaluar el papel de las enfermedades infecciosas en la p´erdida global de especies. Las enfermedades infecciosas fueron identificadas como un factor contribuyente a <4% de las extinciones conoci- das desde 1500 (833 especies de plantas y animales) y como un factor contribuyente al estatus de cr´ıticamente en peligro en <8% de los casos (2852 especies de plantas y animales en peligro cr´ıtico). Aunque parece que las enfermedades infecciosas juegan un papel menor en la p´erdida global de especies, nuestros hallazgos sub- rayan dos limitaciones importantes en la evidencia disponible: incertidumbre acerca de las amenazas a la supervivencia de especies y un sesgo temporal en los datos. Varias iniciativas podr´ıan ayudar a sobreponer esos obstaculos,´ incluyendo pruebas cient´ıficas rigurosas para determinar qu´e enfermedades infecciosas son una amenaza significativa al nivel de especie, reconocimiento de las limitaciones asociadas con la ausencia de datos basicos´ del papel de enfermedades infecciosas en la extincion´ de especies, combinacion´ de datos con teor´ıa para discernir las circunstancias bajo las cuales es mas´ probable que una enfermedad infecciosa funja como agente de extincion´ y mejoramiento de los programas de vigilancia para la deteccion´ de enfermedades infecciosas. El entendimiento, basado en evidencia, del papel de las enfermedades infecciosas en la extincion´ ‡email [email protected] Paper submitted August 23, 2005; revised manuscript accepted March 14, 2006. 1349 Conservation Biology Volume 20, No. 5, 1349–1357 C 2006 Society for Conservation Biology DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00524.x 1350 Infectious Disease and Species Extinction Smith et al. y puesta en peligro de especies ayudara´ a priorizar iniciativas de conservacion´ y proteger la biodiversidad global. Palabras Clave: enfermedades de vida silvestre, IUCN Introduction conservation concern and those documented to have be- come extinct in the past 500 years. It has been used re- Recent studies suggest that infectious diseases in wildlife peatedly to assess the impact of individual and multiple populations are emerging at unusually high rates (Harvell threats in the global loss of biodiversity and for specific et al. 1999, 2002; Epstein 2001). Emerging infectious dis- groups (e.g., Butchart et al. 2004; Gurevitch & Padilla eases (EIDs) are those caused by parasites and pathogens 2004; Clavero & Garcia-Berthou 2005). The IUCN Red that have recently increased in incidence, occupied host List reports more than 38,000 plants and animals whose species or geographic extent; have been newly discov- status is categorized based on a defined set of criteria as ered; or are caused by a newly evolved agent (Lederberg extinct, extinct in the wild, critically endangered, endan- et al. 1992; Daszak et al. 2000). The diversity of EIDs af- gered, vulnerable, lower risk, near threatened, data defi- flicting wildlife, coupled with the fear that an increased cient, or of least concern (IUCN 2004). The database is frequency of outbreaks will occur in the future, have a searchable classification of major species threats (e.g., raised concern that infectious disease may play a strong habitat loss, overexploitation, invasive species) ordered role in species extinction (Holmes 1996; Daszak et al. in a hierarchical manner and reported as “summary doc- 2000; Harvell et al. 2002). Indeed, infectious diseases can umentation” for each species case. “Pathogens and par- extirpate local populations, mediate community dynam- asites” (referred to hereafter as infectious diseases) are ics, and shrink host ranges (McCallum & Dobson 1995; classified as threat types under “invasive alien species” Daszak et al. 1999; Lafferty 2003; Walsh et al. 2003). (threat 2.4) and “changes in native species dynamics” Given the effects of infectious diseases on wildlife, it is (threat 8.5) (IUCN 2004). Because this classification sys- not surprising that a survey of biologists listed infectious tem has only been applied to a fraction of species in disease among the top five causes of species extinctions the database (Clavero & Garcia-Berthou 2004), we in- in the United States (Wilcove et al. 1998). However, the dividually examined the “detailed documentation” of all majority of available data supporting this contention is records of extinct and critically endangered plants and largely anecdotal. Moreover, epidemiological theory pre- animals in the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2004) to deter- dicts that infectious diseases should only drive species mine those threatened by infectious disease. We included to extinction under specific circumstances—most com- the 60 species listed as extinct in the wild (those that monly when pre-epidemic population size is small, reser- exist only in captivity) in our tally of extinct species. voir hosts are available, or when the infectious agent can Given the breadth of the IUCN Red List, we focused on survive in the abiotic environment (de Castro & Bolker these threat categories because they are most informa- 2005). In response to a growing interest in global species tive to our goals and arguably of greatest conservation loss and emerging infectious diseases, it is worth inves- concern. tigating the generalization that infectious diseases play a The IUCN Red List reports only threats that trigger list- widespread role in species extinction. ing of the taxon concerned and does not rank or fully elu- We used the World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red cidate the relative importance of individual threats (IUCN List of Threatened and Endangered Species (IUCN 2004) 2004). Threats are reported as having occurred in the past and the Science Citation Index Expanded (ISI Web of Sci- and/or present and/or future, based on a time frame of ence) to compile the most comprehensive information three generations or 10 years, whichever is longer (not available on the causal role of infectious disease in species exceeding 100 years in the future) (IUCN 2004). A threat extinction. In doing so, we sought to accomplish three that occurred in the past, is occurring in the present, or goals. First, to discern what the available evidence sug- may occur in the future is cited as ongoing (IUCN 2004). gests about the causal role of infectious disease in species For each species account, we recorded the time frame extinction and critical endangerment. Second, to uncover of the threat. Based on the information reported in the limitations of the data that may influence these results. detailed documentation, we tallied a fourth category: hy- Third, to use this knowledge to suggest priority areas for pothesized threat. For example, the summary documen- future research on wildlife infectious diseases. tation often reported infectious disease as a contempo- rary or ongoing threat, whereas the detailed documenta- tion made it clear that the threat was only a hypothesis, IUCN Database and Literature Search that no evidence existed to support the claim, or that on- going research was attempting to discern the threat of Designed for global taxon assessments, the IUCN Red List infectious disease (e.g., descriptions for the critically
Recommended publications
  • SDG Indicator Metadata (Harmonized Metadata Template - Format Version 1.0)
    Last updated: 4 January 2021 SDG indicator metadata (Harmonized metadata template - format version 1.0) 0. Indicator information 0.a. Goal Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss 0.b. Target Target 15.5: Take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats, halt the loss of biodiversity and, by 2020, protect and prevent the extinction of threatened species 0.c. Indicator Indicator 15.5.1: Red List Index 0.d. Series 0.e. Metadata update 4 January 2021 0.f. Related indicators Disaggregations of the Red List Index are also of particular relevance as indicators towards the following SDG targets (Brooks et al. 2015): SDG 2.4 Red List Index (species used for food and medicine); SDG 2.5 Red List Index (wild relatives and local breeds); SDG 12.2 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation) (Butchart 2008); SDG 12.4 Red List Index (impacts of pollution); SDG 13.1 Red List Index (impacts of climate change); SDG 14.1 Red List Index (impacts of pollution on marine species); SDG 14.2 Red List Index (marine species); SDG 14.3 Red List Index (reef-building coral species) (Carpenter et al. 2008); SDG 14.4 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation on marine species); SDG 15.1 Red List Index (terrestrial & freshwater species); SDG 15.2 Red List Index (forest-specialist species); SDG 15.4 Red List Index (mountain species); SDG 15.7 Red List Index (impacts of utilisation) (Butchart 2008); and SDG 15.8 Red List Index (impacts of invasive alien species) (Butchart 2008, McGeoch et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Critically Endangered - Wikipedia
    Critically endangered - Wikipedia Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Critically endangered From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents This article is about the conservation designation itself. For lists of critically endangered species, see Lists of IUCN Red List Critically Endangered Featured content species. Current events A critically endangered (CR) species is one which has been categorized by the International Union for Random article Conservation status Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.[1] Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store As of 2014, there are 2464 animal and 2104 plant species with this assessment, compared with 1998 levels of 854 and 909, respectively.[2] Interaction Help As the IUCN Red List does not consider a species extinct until extensive, targeted surveys have been About Wikipedia conducted, species which are possibly extinct are still listed as critically endangered. IUCN maintains a list[3] Community portal of "possibly extinct" CR(PE) and "possibly extinct in the wild" CR(PEW) species, modelled on categories used Recent changes by BirdLife International to categorize these taxa. Contact page Contents Tools Extinct 1 International Union for Conservation of Nature definition What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 2 See also Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 3 Notes Upload file Threatened Special pages 4 References Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent
    [Show full text]
  • Table 5: Threatened Species in Each Country (Totals by Taxonomic Group)
    IUCN Red List version 2020-1: Table 5 Last updated: 19 March 2020 Table 5: Threatened species in each country (totals by taxonomic group) * Reptiles, fishes, molluscs, other invertebrates, plants, fungi & protists: please note that for these groups, there are still many species that have not yet been assessed for the IUCN Red List and therefore their status is not known (i.e., these groups have not yet been completely assessed). Therefore the figures presented below for these groups should be interpreted as the number of species known to be threatened within those species that have been assessed to date, and not as the overall total number of threatened species for each group. AFRICA Other Fungi & North Africa Mammals Birds Reptiles* Amphibians Fishes* Molluscs* Plants* Total* Inverts* Protists* Algeria 14 15 8 3 45 12 30 26 2 155 Egypt 18 14 13 0 62 1 56 8 0 172 Libya 10 8 6 0 38 1 4 8 0 75 Morocco 18 18 13 2 55 38 33 56 5 238 Tunisia 14 11 6 1 42 8 13 10 2 107 Western Sahara 10 5 1 0 39 2 1 0 0 58 Other Fungi & Sub-Saharan Africa Mammals Birds Reptiles* Amphibians Fishes* Molluscs* Plants* Total* Inverts* Protists* Angola 22 33 7 0 55 7 4 43 0 171 Benin 16 12 7 1 46 2 1 21 0 106 Botswana 11 16 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 33 Burkina Faso 11 12 3 0 4 1 0 5 0 36 Burundi 16 14 0 1 17 3 3 134 0 188 Cabo Verde 4 7 6 0 38 13 0 51 0 119 Cameroon 47 29 13 57 126 13 13 592 0 890 Central African Republic 19 16 5 0 4 0 0 29 0 73 Chad 16 16 5 0 1 4 0 6 0 48 Comoros 5 14 5 0 17 0 77 9 0 127 Congo 18 7 6 1 60 7 0 56 0 155 Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 42
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Appropriate Uses of Iucn Red List Data
    GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF IUCN RED LIST DATA Incorporating, as Annexes, the 1) Guidelines for Reporting on Proportion Threatened (ver. 1.1); 2) Guidelines on Scientific Collecting of Threatened Species (ver. 1.0); and 3) Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the IUCN Red List by Business (ver. 1.0) Version 3.0 (October 2016) Citation: IUCN. 2016. Guidelines for appropriate uses of IUCN Red List Data. Incorporating, as Annexes, the 1) Guidelines for Reporting on Proportion Threatened (ver. 1.1); 2) Guidelines on Scientific Collecting of Threatened Species (ver. 1.0); and 3) Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of the IUCN Red List by Business (ver. 1.0). Version 3.0. Adopted by the IUCN Red List Committee. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ GUIDELINES FOR APPROPRIATE USES OF RED LIST DATA The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is the world’s most comprehensive data resource on the status of species, containing information and status assessments on over 80,000 species of animals, plants and fungi. As well as measuring the extinction risk faced by each species, the IUCN Red List includes detailed species-specific information on distribution, threats, conservation measures, and other relevant factors. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is increasingly used by scientists, governments, NGOs, businesses, and civil society for a wide variety of purposes. These Guidelines are designed to encourage and facilitate the use of IUCN Red List data and information to tackle a broad range of important conservation issues. These Guidelines give a brief introduction to The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ (hereafter called the IUCN Red List), the Red List Categories and Criteria, and the Red List Assessment process, followed by some key facts that all Red List users need to know to maximally take advantage of this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT of 13 July 2012
    THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES: STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-2020 Citation: IUCN Red List Committee. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Strategic Plan 2017 - 2020. Prepared by the IUCN Red List Committee. Cover images (left to right) and photographer credits: IUCN & Intu Boehihartono; Brian Stockwell; tigglrep (via Flickr under CC licence); IUCN & Gillian Eborn; Gianmarco Rojas; Michel Roggo; IUCN & Imene Maliane; IUCN & William Goodwin; IUCN & Christian Winter The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM Strategic Plan 2017 – 2020 2 THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES: STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-2020 January 2017 The IUCN Red List Partnership ............................................................................................ 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 The IUCN Red List: a key conservation tool ....................................................................... 6 The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Strategic Plan 2017-2020 ......................... 7 Result 1. IUCN Red List taxonomic and geographic coverage is expanded ............. 8 Result 2. More IUCN Red List Assessments are prepared at national and, where appropriate, at regional scales .......................................................................................... 8 Result 3. Selected species groups are periodically reassessed to allow the IUCN Red List Index to be widely used as an effective biodiversity indicator. ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Harlequin Frogs (Anura: Atelopus) from the Andes of Northern Peru Pablo J
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Publications Department of Zoology 2008 Two New Harlequin Frogs (Anura: Atelopus) from the Andes of Northern Peru Pablo J. Venegas Alessandro Catenazzi Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Karen Siu Ting Jorge Carrillo Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/zool_pubs Published in Salamandra , Issue 44 (2008) at http://www.salamandra-journal.com/ index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=66 Recommended Citation Venegas, Pablo J., Catenazzi, Alessandro, Siu Ting, Karen and Carrillo, Jorge. "Two New Harlequin Frogs (Anura: Atelopus) from the Andes of Northern Peru." (Jan 2008). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Zoology at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Two new harlequin frogs from Peru SALAMANDRA 44 3 163-176 Rheinbach, 20 August 2008 ISSN 0036-3375 Two new harlequin frogs (Anura: Atelopus) from the Andes of northern Peru Pablo J. Venegas, Alessandro Catenazzi, Karen Siu-Ting & Jorge Carrillo Abstract. Two new species of Atelopus (harlequin frogs) are described from the Andes of northern Peru, one from the northern Cordillera de Huancabamba (Departamento de Piura), 2,950 m elevation, and the other from an inter-Andean valley of the upper Marañon basin, Cordillera Central (Departamento de La Libertad), 2,620 m elevation. We also suggest the possible link between infection by the chytrid fungus and mortality of harlequin frogs in the upper Marañon basin in 999. Key words. Bufonidae, Atelopus patazensis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis in Peru
    xvi AMPHIBIAN DISEASES MUTHS, E., B. S. PEDERSEN, AND F S. PEDERSEN. 2009. How relevant is op- LITERATURE CITED portunistic Bd sampling: Are we ready for the big picture? Herpe- tol. Rev. 40(2):183–184. BOYLE, D. G., D. B. BOYLE, V. OLSEN, J. A. T. MORGAN, AND A. D. HYATT. 2004. OUELLET, M., I. MIKAELIAN, B. D. PAULI, J. RODRIGUE, AND D. M. GREEN. Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytri- 2005. Historical evidence of widespread chytrid infection in North um dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman American amphibian populations. Conserv. Biol. 19:1431–1440. PCR assay. Dis. Aquat. Org. 60:141–148. RODRIGUEZ, E. M., T. GAMBLE, M. V. HIRT, AND S. COTNER. 2009. Presence BREM, F., J. R. MENDELSON III, AND K. R. LIPS. 2007. Field-Sampling Pro- of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis at the headwaters of the Mis- tocol for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis from Living Amphib- sissippi River, Itasca State Park, Minnesota, USA. Herpetol. Rev. ians, Using Alcohol Preserved Swabs. Version 1.0 (18 July 2007). 40(1):48–50. Electronic document accessible at <http://www.amphibianark. SADINSKI, W., M. ROTH, S. TRELEVEN, J. THEYERL, AND P. DUMMER. DETECTION org/resources/other-documents/#Chytrid>. Conservation Inter- OF THE CHYTRID FUNGUS BATRACHOCHYTRIUM DENDROBATIDIS, ON RECENTLY national, Arlington, Virginia. METAMORPHOSED AMPHIBIANS IN THE NORTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES. HERPE- HYATT, A. D., D. G. BOYLE, V. OLSEN, D. B. BOYLE, L. BERGER, D. OBENDORF, TOL. REV. 41(2):170–175. A. DALTON, K. KRIGER, M. HERO, H. HINES, R. PHILLOT, R. CAMPBELL, G. STEINER, S. I., AND R. M. LEHTINEN.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Procedure for IUCN Red List Assessments 2017–2020
    Rules of Procedure for IUCN Red List Assessments 2017–2020 Version 3.0 Citation: IUCN. 2016. Rules of Procedure for IUCN Red List Assessments 2017–2020. Version 3.0. Approved by the IUCN SSC Steering Committee in September 2016. Downloadable from: http://cmsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/keydocuments/Rules_of_Procedure_for_Red_List_2017- 2020.pdf Rules of Procedure for IUCN Red List Assessments 2017–2020 Version 3.0 Contents The IUCN Red List Assessment Process Establishment and Appointment of Red List Authorities Types of Red List Authority Red List Authority Roles and Responsibilities The Red List Authority Coordinator Red List Authority Coordinator Responsibilities Overlapping Red List Authority Jurisdictions Resources Nomenclature Annex 1: Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments Annex 2: Schematic Illustration of the IUCN Red List Assessment Process Annex 3: Details of the Steps Involved in the IUCN Red List Process Annex 4: IUCN Red List Assessment Resources Annex 5: Procedure for Handling of Petitions against Current Listings on the IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM Annex 6: Policy on Use of Pre-Publication IUCN Red List Data Annex 7: Sensitive Data Access Restrictions Policy for the IUCN Red List 1 A. The IUCN Red List Assessment Process The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC), the IUCN Global Species Programme and the Red List Partnership. In order to maintain the credibility of the IUCN Red List, the process by which species can be included on the Red List has been formalized. In particular, this process includes the designation of Red List Authorities (RLAs) and Red List Authority Coordinators, under the auspices of the SSC, the responsibilities of which (and whom) are outlined in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Nature Report
    STATE OF NATURE Foreword by Sir David Attenborough he islands that make up the The causes are varied, but most are (ButterflyHelen Atkinson Conservation) United Kingdom are home to a ultimately due to the way we are using Twonderful range of wildlife that our land and seas and their natural is dear to us all. From the hill-walker resources, often with little regard for marvelling at an eagle soaring overhead, the wildlife with which we share them. to a child enthralled by a ladybird on The impact on plants and animals has their fingertip, we can all wonder at been profound. the variety of life around us. Although this report highlights what However, even the most casual of we have lost, and what we are still observers may have noticed that all is losing, it also gives examples of how not well. They may have noticed the we – as individuals, organisations, loss of butterflies from a favourite governments – can work together walk, the disappearance of sparrows to stop this loss, and bring back nature from their garden, or the absence of where it has been lost. These examples the colourful wildflower meadows of should give us hope and inspiration. their youth. To gain a true picture of the balance of our nature, we require We should also take encouragement a broad and objective assessment of from the report itself; it is heartening the best available evidence, and that is to see so many organisations what we have in this groundbreaking coming together to provide a single State of Nature report.
    [Show full text]
  • (International Trade Restrictions) on Endangered Species Populations
    An Econometric Analysis of the CITES (International Trade Restrictions) on Endangered Species Populations Leah Martindill The College of New Jersey Economics Department Advisor: Dr. Subarna Samanta January 2015 Abstract: The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) restricts the trade of endangered specimens to ensure international trade does not threaten the survival of the species. This international agreement has been around for 40 years and yet there has been no analysis of the effects these trade restrictions actually have on endangered animal populations. This is a preliminary study on the relationship between CITES and the trend of endangered species populations. The purpose of this paper is to start a conversation about ensuring that our animal conservation methods do not just sound good, but produce their intended results. As the World continues to become more global, the need for conservation methods that work becomes more critical. In order to ensure the efficacy of such methods, a definitive way to measure their effects must be established. This study attempts to draw initial conclusions about the success of the CITES convention. Contents Introduction 3 Review of Literature 6 Data & Methodology 7 Econometric Results 10 Conclusion 12 Bibliography 14 Appendix 15 2 Introduction In the last five hundred years, over eight hundred species of plant and animal have been forced into extinction due to human activity.1 As more of the World develops, so do concerns for the environment. For the past several decades conservation has been given international attention. Global World-leaders and scientists have made issues of environmental conservation and protection priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species PROGRAMME Threatened Species: a Guide to Red Lists and Their Use in Conservation LIST of ABBREVIATIONS
    Threatened Species PROGRAMME Threatened Species: A guide to Red Lists and their use in conservation LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AOO Area of Occupancy BMP Biodiversity Management Plan CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species DAFF Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EOO Extent of Occurrence IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature NEMA National Environmental Management Act NEMBA National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act NGO Non-governmental Organization NSBA National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment PVA Population Viability Analysis SANBI South African National Biodiversity Institute SANSA South African National Survey of Arachnida SIBIS SANBI's Integrated Biodiversity Information System SRLI Sampled Red List Index SSC Species Survival Commission TSP Threatened Species Programme Threatened Species: A guide to Red Lists and their use in conservation OVERVIEW The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)’s Red List is a world standard for evaluating the conservation status of plant and animal species. The IUCN Red List, which determines the risks of extinction to species, plays an important role in guiding conservation activities of governments, NGOs and scientific institutions, and is recognized worldwide for its objective approach. In order to produce the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™, the IUCN Species Programme, working together with the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and members of IUCN, draw on and mobilize a network of partner organizations and scientists worldwide. One such partner organization is the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), who, through the Threatened Species Programme (TSP), contributes information on the conservation status and biology of threatened species in southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator-Prey Interactions Between Hellbenders
    PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HELLBENDERS (CRYPTOBRANCHUS ALLEGANIENSIS ALLEGANIENSIS AND C. A. BISHOPI) AND NATIVE AND NONNATIVE FISHES A Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Biology By Brian G. Gall August 2008 PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HELLBENDERS (CRYPTOBRANCHUS ALLEGANIENSIS ALLEGANIENSIS AND C. A. BISHOPI) AND NATIVE AND NONNATIVE FISHES Department of Biology Missouri State University, August 2008 Masters of Science Brian G. Gall ABSTRACT The introduction of nonnative fishes often results in the local extinction of native amphibians due to a lack of evolutionary history and therefore, minimally-adapted antipredator behaviors toward the introduced fishes. Populations of hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) in Missouri have declined considerably since the 1980’s, coinciding with a rapid increase in trout introductions for recreational angling. I examined hellbender and fish predator-prey interactions by: (1) examining the foraging behavior of predatory fishes in response to a hellbender secretion; (2) comparing the number of secretion and control-soaked food pellets consumed by trout; and (3) comparing the response of larval hellbenders to chemical stimuli from introduced (trout) and native fish predators. Brown trout, walleye and large banded sculpin respond to hellbender secretions with increased activity while small banded sculpin responded by decreasing activity. In addition, brown trout ingested more hellbender secretion-soaked food pellets than control pellets, while rainbow trout expelled secretion-soaked food pellets. Finally, larval hellbenders exhibited weak fright behavior in response to chemical stimuli from nonnative trout relative to their responses to native predatory fish stimuli. These combinations of responses indicate that predation by nonnative fishes may be a plausible hypothesis for the decline of hellbender populations in Missouri.
    [Show full text]