DOCSLIB.ORG

A Conversation with Shuli and Michal Rand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Conversation with Shuli and Michal Rand A Conversation For halachic reasons, Shuli insisted that his real-life wife, Michal Bat-Sheva, who with Shuli and had never acted before, star opposite him in Ushpizin. Shuli won the Israeli Film Academy’s 2004 Best Actor Award, the Israeli equivalent of the Oscar. Photos courtesy of New Line Home Michal Rand Entertainment BY DOV PARIS Shuli and Michal Bat-Sheva Rand don’t look like your typical movie stars. Sure, they recently starred in a groundbreaking Israeli film that has won acclaim far beyond the Jewish community. But this middle-aged couple is anything but your typical image of celebrity, and that’s because this former actor and his wife are Breslov Chassidim. Ushpizin, a box-office hit in Israel and one of the highest grossing foreign films in America last year, was a rare collaboration between secular and Orthodox Israelis. Screenwriter/actor Shuli Rand won the Israeli Film Academy’s 2004 Best Actor Award, the Israeli equivalent of the Oscar, for his role in Ushpizin. Dov Paris sat down with the Rands to discuss the movie, their return to Judaism and their plans for the future. In what follows, unless otherwise indicated, the answers are credited to the Rands, rather than to Shuli or Michal separately, since they were both present at the interview and answered the questions together. Ed. JA: Do you view your stage and movie reasons. [Shuli would not play opposite superficial understanding of the career primarily as an opportunity for a woman other than his wife.] Orthodox world. We did not aim [at personal development, or as a means to We did not want to appear as if reaching] only the non-observant, but impact our largely secular society and we are out to proselytize. Nor do we rather we hoped to foster unity, to bring people back to the fold? think that we are suited for that role, or enhance mutual understanding between that the movie would have had such a religious and non-religious. Shuli: Answering this question is not positive impact [had our agenda been to easy. Personal development came second “convert” the audience]. Because of my JA: Could you name a particular mis- at most; certainly for Michal, who had demanding work, I do not learn as conception you wished to dispel? never been involved in acting before much Torah as other members of our The Rands: Well, take, for example, the and joined the cast because of halachic Breslov community and do not consider supposed oppression of women in tradi- Rabbi Dr. Paris was born in Israel, educated in myself qualified to preach. We had a tional Jewish communities. Two earlier Israeli yeshivot and attended Brown University more modest aim: to expose people, via Israeli movies spread the false notion where he earned a PhD in economics. He has the medium of movies, to the treasures that Chareidi women are little more taught both Chassidic thought and economics in and beauty of Judaism, to Rabbi the United States and in Israel. He lives in than baby-making machines, and are Jerusalem with his wife and four children. The Nachman’s ideas and to the Breslov cast aside if they cannot have children. interview was conducted in Hebrew and trans- world. We hoped to dispel misconcep- In Ushpizin, Malli has difficulty becom- lated by Dr. Paris. tions that are rooted in the media’s ing pregnant. Yet Moshe, her husband, 44 JEWISH ACTION Fall 5767/2006 treats her with the utmost love and care, rience but also a way of life; Breslov intellectual pursuit, that it means com- insisting that he wants to have children Chassidut is highly creative in numerous mitment, actually observing the mitzvot. but only with her. Moshe buys the “dia- ways, and it offers a unique perspective As we became more observant we also mond,” the most expensive etrog in on life. It provides overall life direction saw that my acting career was not con- town, for the exorbitant price of 1,000 as well as guidance in daily matters. sistent with a genuine Torah life. I quit shekalim—about a quarter of his and Naturally, we want to convey to others the theater to study Torah full time. Malli’s miraculous windfall—because it what worked so well for us—the movie I only became Breslov after I might mystically trigger another miracle is one way of doing so. returned to observant life. Breslov is and help Malli become pregnant. Some quite fashionable in Israel even among critics noted that the movie portrays the JA: What attracted you to Orthodoxy, the non-observant—in fact, a recent modesty and love found in Chareidi and specifically to Breslov? Which one Khan Theater show based on Rabbi marriages, as Moshe and Malli show came first? Nachman’s “The Seven Beggars” was a such affection for each other without Shuli: It is hard to say what attracted us tremendous success—and like many ever touching on screen. Israelis, we had already been acquainted with Breslov before we began JA: Do you feel you keeping the mitzvot. Now, have been suc- like others in the process of cessful in dis- doing teshuvah, we experi- pelling these ence ups and downs in misconceptions? our search for answers. The Rands: We have found that Beyond our Rabbi Nachman’s writ- wildest dreams. ings are more attuned to We certainly did our needs than others, not expect the that he offers in-depth film to elicit such advice regarding the very a warm response problems that bother us; among viewers. A he infuses our certain Israeli-owned Jewishness with mean- web site announced it ing. would be showing Ushpizin for free for JA: How do you a short period of explain the interest in time. The site drew Breslov, and why some 20,000 visi- Shuli Rand (as Moshes Bellanga) Breslov attracts so stars in Ushpizin, a movie about a Breslov many people? Does this interest actual- tors, several times its ba’al teshuvah whose faith is challenged usual number. It also when people from his past arrive unan- ly lead significant numbers to embrace generated 1,353 responses to a ques- nounced at his sukkah. Orthodoxy? tionnaire about the movie. A compre- The Rands: The interest is indeed hensive analysis of the data is yet to amazing, for two reasons. Firstly, since come, but some of the results are to Orthodoxy because we returned Rabbi Nachman’s death [in 1810], astounding. For example, 670 respon- gradually. It did not happen overnight; Breslov has not had a living rebbe, yet it dents expressed an interest in learning we did not “see the light” and return in attracts more ba’alei teshuvah—from all more about Judaism, 540 were surprised a flash. Unlike Michal, I grew up in a walks of life—than the Lithuanian by how women are treated in the religious home and had a religious edu- yeshivot and most other Chassidic Breslov community, and 275 reported cation. At a certain point, I lost my groups put together. Breslov Chassidut is that the movie caused them to begin to faith, as happens with many youth, but so attractive, perhaps because it makes observe Shabbat. we made our way back to the fold room for everybody, even beginners. together. True, Breslov, like Chassidut generally, is JA: How important are Rabbi I was still working in the theater based on the paradoxical maxim that Nachman and Breslov Chassidut in full time when we began learning Jewish man can become something only by your Yiddishkeit? texts. At some point, we felt that some- considering himself nothing—relative to The Rands: Very important. Being a thing was lacking; we realized that God—thereby attaching himself to Breslover is not just an intellectual expe- Judaism is about life itself, not just an Him. At the same time, Breslovers treat Fall 5767/2006 JEWISH ACTION 45 everyone with respect: One may belittle nity follows Rabbi Nachman’s teachings. money are capable of genuinely over- himself, but not others. Breslov is very Rabbi Nachman was not merely a deep coming the desire for money. inclusive and believes that everybody— and abstract thinker as many believe; he Hence he encouraged his disci- scholar or not—can have a deep rela- was also a leader of a community, teach- ples—even his very son-in-law—to tionship with Hashem and can join in ing that the way of a Torah life is in the become financially independent by avodat Hashem. details. Thus, when dealing with print- engaging in business, exhorting them to Secondly, it is amazing that Rabbi ing the Likutei Maharan—which he do so honestly and only for a few hours Nachman himself was surrounded by regarded as heralding the Era of a day, as learning Torah should be their highly pious and learned disciples, sort Mashiach—he inquired about even the primary occupation. This is an example of an elite society, yet his writings are most mundane details, such as the of the Breslov holistic approach, relevant very well attuned to beginners and to minute expenses. to everybody, at all times. ba’alei teshuvah today. He actually Rabbi Nachman struggled exten- stressed that he was writing for future sively with the issue of materialism and JA: What has been the response of the generations, and he deals with the very developed a dualistic approach to it. He Chareidi community to the movie? issues that bother modern despised and sharply criticized material- The Rands: Officially, people. Rabbi Nachman’s the movie was shown writings, which are at the only to non-Chareidi same time both logical and audiences, since that poetical, reveal how multi- was the condition dimensional he was.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHELM in JERUSALEM by R. Seliger
    CHELM IN JERUSALEM By R. Seliger It’s Sukkot, the holiday that requires observant Jews to feel the fragility of our existence by eating in the sukkah – the fragile temporary outdoor booth, exposed to the elements of early fall. I wrote this film review two years ago. If you have the opportunity, you should consider the delights of this unusual film. “Ushpizin” resembles an Isaac Bashevis Singer tale in its rendering of totally sincere (or naive) characters immersed in religious observances, a belief in miracles, and a personal relationship with the Almighty. The world of Jerusalem’s Hasidim is largely a ghetto in its isolation from the rest of modern Israel, but not quite. Two convicts, evading the law, show up at the doorstep of our hero, Moshe Bellanga, and his good wife Malli, on erev Sukkot. It turns out that one criminal was a friend from Moshe’s wayward days in Eilat before he became a Baal Tshuva [a newly observant Jew] as a Breslover Hasid. The Bellangas are overjoyed that the two can be their ushpizin – Aramaic for “holy guests” – for the holiday, as traditional lore enjoins. But there is nothing holy in how their low-life guests behave. That the virtually destitute Bellangas have a sukkah and the money to celebrate the festival at all are “miracles.” Actually, they are the result of perfectly explainable events, but the pious couple understands their dramatic change of fortune as divine intervention, as an answer to their devotion and a part of their ongoing dialogue with Hashem. Similarly, when bad fortune strikes, they are rendered bereft not only by the event itself, but also by the notion that they have done something displeasing in the eyes of God or, even more painfully, that their suffering has meaning they cannot fathom in the sacred scheme of things.
    [Show full text]
  • The Difference Between Blessing (Bracha) and Prayer (Tefilah)
    1 The Difference between Blessing (bracha) and Prayer (tefilah) What is a Bracha? On the most basic level, a bracha is a means of recognizing the good that God has given to us. As the Talmud2 states, the entire world belongs to God, who created everything, and partaking in His creation without consent would be tantamount to stealing. When we acknowledge that our food comes from God – i.e. we say a bracha – God grants us permission to partake in the world's pleasures. This fulfills the purpose of existence: To recognize God and come close to Him. Once we have been satiated, we again bless God, expressing our appreciation for what He has given us.3 So, first and foremost, a bracha is a "please" and a "thank you" to the Creator for the sustenance and pleasure He has bestowed upon us. The Midrash4 relates that Abraham's tent was pitched in the middle of an intercity highway, and open on all four sides so that any traveler was welcome to a royal feast. Inevitably, at the end of the meal, the grateful guests would want to thank Abraham. "It's not me who you should be thanking," Abraham replied. "God provides our food and sustains us moment by moment. To Him we should give thanks!" Those who balked at the idea of thanking God were offered an alternative: Pay full price for the meal. Considering the high price for a fabulous meal in the desert, Abraham succeeded in inspiring even the skeptics to "give God a try." Source of All Blessing Yet the essence of a bracha goes beyond mere manners.
    [Show full text]
  • March Chronicle.Indd
    CONGREGATION NEVEH SHALOM March 2008/ADAR I/Adadr II 5768 CHRONICLE No. 6 This newsletter is supportedpp by y the Sala Kryszek y Memorial Publication Fund From the Pulpit Esther: The Paradigm of the Diaspora Jewish Existence If we accept the Exodus epic as our Jewish master story, then the drama contained in the scroll of Esther constitutes the paradigmatic story of Jewish existence in the Diaspora. A master story of an ethnic, religious or national entity is the central historical event or series of events that informs that society about its guiding values and principles. Clearly the Exodus from Egyptian bondage followed by the receipt of God’s revelation and wandering 40 years in the wilderness on their way to the Promised Land serves that primary purpose for Jews. God heard the cry of the oppressed and chose Moses as God’s instrument in challenging Pharaoh to liberate God’s own people. Once free, the Children of Israel came to Mt. Sinai where God gave them laws to live by in order to establish a moral society. Together they persevered until they were worthy of inheriting the land that God promised them as an everlasting inheritance. However instructive our master story is in defi ning our most highly treasured values, nearly 2000 years of our history were spent far from our ancestral home in lands of the Jewish Diaspora. We lived in foreign lands as a subject minority population. We did our best to simultaneously be loyal residents (because not until the French Revolution and the American experience were we considered full citizens) and maintain our distinct identity as Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassidus on the Chassidus on the Parsha +
    LIGHTS OF OUR RIGHTEOUS TZADDIKIM בעזרת ה ' יתבר A Tzaddik, or righteous person , makes everyone else appear righteous before Hashem by advocating for them and finding their merits. Kedushas Levi, Parshas Noach (Bereishis 7:1) VA’ES CHA NAN _ CHASSIDUS ON THE PARSHA + Dvar Torah Deciphered Messages The Torah tells us ( Shemos 19:19) that when the Jewish people gathered at Mount Sinai to receive the Torah , “Moshe spoke and Hashem answered him with a voice.” The Gemora (Berochos 45a) der ives from this pasuk the principle that that an interpreter should not speak more loudly than the reader whose words he is translating. Tosafos immediately ask the obvious question: from that pasuk we see actually see the opposite: that the reader should n ot speak more loudly than the interpreter. We know, says Rav Levi Yitzchok, that Moshe’s nevua (prophecy) was different from that of the other nevi’im (prophets) in that “the Shechina was speaking through Moshe’s throat”. This means that the interpretation of the nevuos of the other nevi’im is not dependent on the comprehension of the people who hear it. The nevua arrives in this world in the mind of the novi and passes through the filter of his perspectives. The resulting message is the essence of the nevua. When Moshe prophesied, however, it was as if the Shechina spoke from his throat directly to all the people on their particular level of understanding. Consequently, his nevuos were directly accessible to all people. In this sense then, Moshe was the rea der of the nevua , and Hashem was the interpreter.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] (You Know, the Ones That Took the 126 That It Will Never Work
    ב''ה 230 hale lane , edgware middx, ha8 9pz Volume 29 • Tishrei 5775 HOLIDAYGUIDEHOLIDAYGUIDE HOWHOW WILLWILL HEHE EARNEARN AA LIVINLIVINGG FFIDDLERIDDLER’S’S QQUEUESTSTIONION Table of Contents 8 24 10 7 featured 7 That’s alright, you can do it . 8 How will he earn a living? 10 Holiday Guide 14 Tishrei Calendar 20 Fiddler’s question 24 Yusta regular From the Editor 4 Message from the Rebbe 5 Lubavitch of Edgware News 16 Candle Lighting Times and Blessings 19 Lubavitch of Radlett News 22 Letters 26 20 3 Editorial Torah PUBLISHER Chadron Ltd on behalf of Lubavitch of Edgware. A division of Chabad Lubavitch UK Registered Charity No. 227638 EDITORIAL Editor: Mrs. Feige Sudak JUST A PINHOLE rom my earliest days i had a knows that to us the whole concept of ADVERTISING fascination for science and Teshuva – return is daunting and leaves To advertise please call technology. i was only eight years us very scared. particularly, as we come 020 8905 4141 F old when i managed to collect enough close to rosh hashanah and then even to SUBSCRIPTIONS ‘cigarette vouchers’ from my father’s Yom Kippur, the notion that we can repair Phone: smoking habit (in those days smoking our past and come to be close with g-d 020 8905 4141 was an acceptable form of behaviour) to is so distant from us that we just do not Email: exchange for a Kodak instamatic Camera believe it. so, we fight it off with excuses [email protected] (you know, the ones that took the 126 that it will never work.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Hitbodedut</I> for a New Age: Adaptation of Practices Among the Followers of Rabbi Nachman of Bratslav
    Hitbodedut for a New Age Adaptation of Practices among the Followers of Rabbi Nachman of Bratslav Tomer Persico AbstrAct: The quest for personal and inner spiritual transformation and development is prevalent among spiritual seekers today and constitutes a major characteristic of contemporary spirituality and the New Age phenomenon. Religious leaders of the Bratslav community endeavor to satisfy this need by presenting adjusted versions of hitbodedut meditation, a practice that emphasizes solitary and personal connection with the divine. As is shown by two typical examples, popular Bratslav teachers today take full advantage of the opportunity to infuse the hitbodedut with elements not found in Rabbi Nachman’s teachings and to dispense with some elements that were. The article addresses the socio-political rationale at the root of these teachers’ novel interpretation of Bratslav hitbodedut and the ways they attempt to deal with the complications that arise out of their work. Keywords: acculturation, Bratslav, contemporary spirituality, hitbodedut, Israel, mysticism, New Age, Rabbi Nachman The Bratslav Hasidic community is currently experiencing an unprece- dented burgeoning. As one of the primary sites for welcoming secular Jews “back into the fold” of observant Judaism, as a fruitful wellspring of contemporary cultural creation, and as the organizing and operating force behind the annual Rosh Hashanah pilgrimage to Uman, Ukraine, the field of its influence is wide (Baumgarten 2012; Mark 2011). The sect was founded by Rabbi Nachman (1772–1810) from the town of Bratslav (Bres- lov) in Ukraine, an early Hasidic leader. As might be expected, just as the flowering of this old Hasidic commu- nity is itself new and surprising, many of the phenomena characteristic of Israel Studies Review, Volume 29, Issue 2, Winter 2014: 99–117 © Association for Israel Studies doi: 10.3167/isr.2014.290207 • ISSN 2159-0370 (Print) • ISSN 2159-0389 (Online) 100 | Tomer Persico current Bratslav practices are novel and would surprise a veteran Bratslav Hasid.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamorphoses of a Platonic Theme in Jewish Mysticism
    MOSHE IDEL METAMORPHOSES OF A PLATONIC THEME IN JEWISH MYSTICISM 1. KABBALAH AND NEOPLATONISM Both the early Jewish philosophers – Philo of Alexandria and R. Shlomo ibn Gabirol, for example – and the medieval Kabbalists were acquainted with and influenced by Platonic and Neoplatonic sources.1 However, while the medieval philosophers were much more systematic in their borrowing from Neoplatonic sources, especially via their transformations and transmissions from Arabic sources and also but more rarely from Christian sources, the Kabbalists were more sporadic and fragmentary in their appropriation of Neoplatonism. Though the emergence of Kabbalah has often been described by scholars as the synthesis of Neoplatonism and Gnosticism,2 I wonder not only about the role attributed to Gnosticism in the formation of early Kabbalah, but also about the possi- bly exaggerated role assigned to Neoplatonism. Not that I doubt the im- pact of Neoplatonism, but I tend to regard the Neoplatonic elements as somewhat less formative for the early Kabbalah than what is accepted by scholars.3 We may, however, assume a gradual accumulation of Neoplatonic 1 G. Scholem, ‘The Traces of ibn Gabirol in Kabbalah’, Me’assef Soferei Eretz Yisrael (Tel- Aviv, 1960), pp. 160–78 (Hebrew); M. Idel, ‘Jewish Kabbalah and Platonism in the Middle Ages and Renaissance’, in Neoplatonism and Jewish Thought, ed. L. E. Goodman (Albany: SUNY Press, 1993), pp. 319–52; M. Idel, ‘The Magical and Neoplatonic Interpretations of Kabbalah in the Renaissance’, Jewish Thought in the Sixteenth Century, ed. B. D. Cooperman (Cambridge, MA, 1983), pp. 186–242. 2 G. Scholem, Origins of the Kabbalah (tr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mattos Chassidus on the Massei ~ Mattos Chassidus on the Parsha +
    LIGHTS OF OUR RIGHTEOUS TZADDIKIM בעזרת ה ' יתבר A Tzaddik, or righteous person , makes everyone else appear righteous before Hashem by advocating for them and finding their merits. Kedushas Levi, Parshas Noach (Bereishis 7:1) MATTOS ~ MASSEI _ CHASSIDUS ON THE PARSHA + Dvar Torah – Mattos Keep Your Word The Torah states (30:3), “If a man takes a vow or swears an oath to G -d to establish a prohibition upon himself, he shall not violate his word; he shall fulfill whatever comes out of his mouth.” In relation to this passuk , the Midrash quotes from Tehillim (144:4), “Our days are like a fleeting shadow.” What is the connection? This can be explained, says Rav Levi Yitzchok, according to a Gemara ( Nedarim 10b), which states, “It is forbidden to say, ‘ Lashem korban , for G-d − an offering.’ Instead a person must say, ‘ Korban Lashem , an offering for G -d.’ Why? Because he may die before he says the word korban , and then he will have said the holy Name in vain.” In this light, we can understand the Midrash. The Torah states that a person makes “a vow to G-d.” This i s the exact language that must be used, mentioning the vow first. Why? Because “our days are like a fleeting shadow,” and there is always the possibility that he may die before he finishes his vow and he will have uttered the Name in vain. n Story The wood chopper had come to Ryczywohl from the nearby village in which he lived, hoping to find some kind of employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Nachman of Breslev and Cognitive Therapy: a Short
    2020-3882-AJSS Rabbi 1 Nachman of Breslev and Cognitive Therapy: A Short Comparison 2 of Conceptual and Psycho-Educational Similarities 3 4 The 5teachings of Rabbi Nachman of Breslev (1772-1810) focused on a number of key concepts 6 . He taught his followers that deviant past actions result from perceiving illusions 7 which contorted reality. In addition, these illusions which led in the past to transgressions 8 and deviant religious and social behavior, need to be rationally understood 9 in order to erase them. The individual needs to focus on the rational present 10 in order to improve his or her perceptions and actions and to live according to god 's11 will. Unlike classical depth psychology which dwells on problematic key personality 12 issues linked to the individual's past and are usually embedded in the subconscious 13 or the unconscious, cognitive therapy suggests that problematic issues affecting 14 the individual can be dealt with by helping the individual to rationally overcome 15 difficulties by identifying and changing dysfunctional thinking, beliefs, behavior, 16 and emotional responses. The conceptual definitions used by Rabbi Nachman 17 in his theological model expounded in the latter part of the eighteenth century 18 and by those espousing the model underlying cognitive therapy in the 20th and 21st 19centuries are remarkably similar and seem to have evolved from the same psychological 20 assumptions. The similarities between the principles underlying two theories 21 are analyzed and discussed in the present paper. 22 Keywords: 23 Chassidic (Piety) movement; Likutey Moharan; Tzaddik, (holy man); Rabbi 24 Nachman's guiding principles; Guiding principles of cognitive therapy 25 26 Introduction 27 28 29The Chassidic (Piety) movement was founded in the early 18th-century Eastern 30 Europe as a reaction against traditional Orthodox Judaism that traditionally 31 focused almost solely on legalistic and intellectual aspects of the Jewish 32 religion till that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Jewish at Burning Man: a Scholarly Personal Narrative On
    DOING JEWISH AT BURNING MAN: A SCHOLARLY PERSONAL NARRATIVE ON IDENTITY, COMMUNITY, AND SPIRITUALITY By Becca Grumet ________________________________________________________________________ Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Jewish Nonprofit Management Hebrew Union College - Jewish Institute of Religion Spring 2016 HEBREW UNION COLLEGE - JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION LOS ANGELES SCHOOL ZELIKOW SCHOOL OF JEWISH NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT DOING JEWISH AT BURNING MAN: A SCHOLARLY PERSONAL NARRATIVE ON IDENTITY, COMMUNITY, AND SPIRITUALITY By Becca Grumet Approved By: ______________________ Advisor _______________________ ZSJNM Director Table of Contents Abstract 1 Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 3 Methodology 7 Background Overview of Burning Man 9 Religion and Spirituality in Popular Culture 11 Spirituality by the Numbers at Burning Man 14 Jews at Burning Man 15 What is Jewish Spirituality? 17 Chapter 1: Welcome Home 19 Chapter 2: Hitbotdedut 25 Chapter 3: Honey Moo-Moos Jewish identity among Honeys 30 Milk + Honey camp identity 34 Chapter 4: Let’s Get Spiritual Friday Night Shabbat 43 Spirituality Among Honey Moo-Moos 56 Spirituality at The Temple 59 Spirituality at The Man 62 Conclusions & Recommendations Milk + Honey as Valuable for Jewish Identity and Community 64 Burning Man as Spiritual Hub 66 No Tent Jewish Community 68 Outcomes of No Tent Jewish Community 71 Accepting of Fluid Organizational Identity 73 References 76 1 Abstract On August 30th, 2016, I boarded a tiny plane at LAX to Reno, Nevada, and then a packed bus to the Burning Man Festival in the Black Rock Desert. I stayed with a theme camp called Milk + Honey for one week, which is known for its giant Friday night Shabbat service and dinner open to all.
    [Show full text]
  • Sefer Devekut the Book of Attachment (To G-D) a Selection from the Book, “Walking in the Fire”
    KosherTorah.com Sefer Devekut The Book of Attachment (To G-d) A Selection from the book, “Walking In The Fire” The Prophetic/Meditative Traditions (Kabbalah) of Bonding With G-d A Work by HaRav Ariel Bar Tzadok Copyright © 2004 by Ariel Bar Tzadok. All rights reserved. Yeshivat Benei Nviim – KosherTorah.com 18375 Ventura Blvd. Suite 314 Tarzana, CA. 91356 USA email: [email protected] Phone: (818) 345-0888 1 Copyright © 1993 - 2004 by Ariel Bar Tzadok. All rights reserved. KosherTorah.com Operations of the Mind/Soul and Its Cleansing Introduction, Part 1 – The Concept & The Halakha "And you who bond to HaShem your G-d are all alive day.” (Devarim 4, 4) "Respect HaShem your G-d, Him shall you serve, to Him shall you bond and His Name shall you praise." (Devarim 10, 20) "You shall walk after HaShem your G-d, Him shall you respect, His mitzvot shall you observe, to His Voice shall you listen, Him shall you serve, and to Him shall you bond.” (Devarim 13, 5) These pasukim and others like it outline for us the Torah commandment to bond with G-d. Now, as one can imagine the idea of bonding with G-d is rather nebulous and subject to various interpretations. Yet, our Sages have been quiet precise in explaining to us the meaning of the bonding. On one hand, being that G-d is called a Consuming Fire (Dev 4:24, 9:3), and one who draws too close to the flames can be burnt, one should instead bond with the Sages of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Sivan 1807.Dwd
    SIVAN Life's splendor forever lies in wait 1 Sivan about each one of us in all its fullness, but veiled from view, deep down, Day Forty-five, making six weeks and three days, of the invisible, far off. It is there, though, Omer not hostile, not reluctant, not deaf. If Rosh Hodesh Sivan Hillula of Bohemian-born Austrian writer Franz Kafka, you summon it by the right word, by its pictured at right. Kafka was an admirer of right name, it will come. –Franz Kafka anarcho-communist theoretician Pyotr Kropotkin. As an elementary and secondary school student, Kafka wore a red carnation in his lapel to show his support for socialism. (1 Sivan 5684, 3 June 1924) Hillula of Polish-born U.S. labor lawyer Jack Zucker. When Senator Joseph McCarthy impugned Zucker’s patriotism, Zucker retorted, “I have more patriotism in my little finger than you have in your entire body!” (1 Sivan 5761, 23 May 2001) Hillula of Samaritan High Priest Levi ben Abisha ben Pinhas ben Yitzhaq, the first Samaritan High Priest to visit the United States (1 Sivan 5761, 23 May 2001) Hillula of U.S. labor leader Gus Tyler, pictured at right. Born Augustus Tilove, he adopted the sur- name Tyler as a way of honoring Wat Tyler, the leader of a 14th-century English peasant rebellion. (1 Sivan 5771, 3 June 2011) Hillula of Annette Dreyfus Benacerraf, niece of 1965 Nobel laureate in Physiology or Medicine Jacques Monod and wife of 1980 Nobel laureate in Physiology or Medicine Baruj Benacerraf (1 Sivan 5771, 3 June 2011) 2 Sivan Day Forty-six, making six weeks and four days, of the Omer Hillula of Rebbe Israel Hager of Vizhnitz, pictured at near right.
    [Show full text]