Dr James Popple — Principal Reviewer — Canberra

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Dr James Popple — Principal Reviewer — Canberra James has had 23 years’ experience in government and administrative law, including extensive experience reviewing and investigating a wide range of complex and difficult legal issues. For three years, James was a Senior Member of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal where he conducted independent merits reviews of administrative decisions made by Ministers, departments and agencies under Commonwealth laws. Prior to his work with the AAT, James was the inaugural Australian Freedom of Information Commissioner (SES Band 3) from 2010 until 2014. In that role he conducted merits reviews of a significant number of FOI decisions, provided advice to government and agency leaders and investigated complaints about FOI processing. James worked for 12 years in the Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department - including six years as a Division Head (SES Band 2). At AGD, he worked in a variety of areas including privacy law; tribunal reform; administrative law; legal aid; Indigenous justice; personal property securities law; Commonwealth legal services; bankruptcy and personal insolvency; copyright; classification; international legal services; and support for the Attorney-General in the performance of his First Law Officer role. Prior to his work with the AGD, James was Deputy Registrar of the High Court of Australia and before that served as a judge's associate. James has a PhD in artificial intelligence and law and is an Honorary Professor of the Australian National University (in the College of Law and the College of Engineering and Computer Science). He also has degrees in law and arts, and is admitted as a legal practitioner in the High Court of Australia and the Supreme Courts of the ACT, NSW and Victoria. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Australian Law Librarian
Australian Law Librarian Vol 19 No. 4 2011 ALLJ Vol.19 No.4.indd 1 24/11/11 12:57:26 PM Australian Law Libarian Published on behalf of the Australian Law Librarians’ Association and printed and distributed compliments of Thomson Reuters The Australian Law Librarian is the official journal Subscriptions of the Australian Law Librarians’ Association. It Australian Law Librarian (ISSN 1039-6616) is contains articles of interest to those working within published quarterly in March, June, September the field of legal librarianship and publishing and December. The subscription price includes fields. It also provides a vehicle for information delivery. sharing amongst divisions of the ALLA as well as serving as a forum for discussion of issues related Subscribers may send orders directly to the Journal to legal publishing. or use a subscription agent. Notes for Contributors Current subscriptions rates are: The Journal welcomes the contribution of articles, book reviews and notes. Acceptance and $A115.00 within Australia & New Zealand. publication of contributions is at the discretion $A130.00 Overseas Airmail. of the Editorial Board. More information on $A30.00 for individual and back issues. contributing to the Journal, as well as the Editorial Prices include GST. Policy, is available at <http://www.alla.asn.au/allj/ allcontributors>. For existing subscribers renewals are sent out in December each year and the 2012 Subscription Articles should generally be 1500 to 3000 words Form is available on the ALLA website. in length, but consideration will be given to longer and shorter articles that deal with issues relevant Copying to the practice of law librarianship.
[Show full text]
Making a Difference 40 Years of the Commonwealth Ombudsman © Commonwealth of Australia, Represented by the Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman, 2017
Making a difference 40 years of the Commonwealth Ombudsman © Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman, 2017. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 or unless otherwise expressly indicated all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be sent to [email protected] While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman, nor any of the contributors, participating in its production in any capacity, shall have liability to any person or entity with respect to any liability, loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused, directly or indirectly, by the information contained in, or omitted from, this book. Unless otherwise specified, images in the book were sourced from the Ombudsman’s office collection – many were drawn from annual reports. The Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman thanks the copyright owners who have given permission to have their photographs used. Every effort has been made to identify copyright and locate owners to obtain permission. Published by the Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman, 2017. TITLE: Making a Difference – 40 years of the Commonwealth Ombudsman ISBN: 978-0-9875235-4-9 Author: Carmel Meiklejohn Designer: David Foira Publisher: Bytes ‘n Colours, Canberra 40 years Making a difference The Office of the Commonwealth But the core values set from the very beginning of the office – Ombudsman celebrates its independence, integrity, accessibility and professionalism – remain 40th anniversary in 2017. the same and will continue to guide the office into its fifth decade. Part of the ‘new administrative law’ On behalf of Commonwealth Ombudsmen past and present, I reforms of the 1970s and early 1980s, would like to thank the staff of the office over the past 40 years the Ombudsman was established whose leadership, dedication and enthusiasm have ensured that to provide an avenue for citizens to the office has and is always making a difference.
[Show full text]
Seventh National Court Technology Conference Courts Online
Seventh National Court Technology Conference Page 1 of 15 Seventh National Court Technology Conference Baltimore, Maryland August, 2001 Education Article Courts Online - Privacy and Public Access in Australian and United States' Courts By Anne Wallace, Karen Gottlieb I. Introduction The transformation of court records from paper to electronic began over two decades ago with the introduction of basic office software, databases and case management systems. Over the past five years, the advent of electronic filing with digital signatures, the use of imaging technology and XML mark-up language, and the rapid development of the Internet have begun to further transform the court record. Some jurisdictions have already reached the point where there is a seamless integration from electronically filed documents to electronic court files which are available to be used, in that form, in the courtroom. Courts in Australia are following the lead of the United States in implementing these systems, and their use is predicted to become widespread in coming years. [1] Computerized records have already made it far easier to compile, search, retrieve and present data from court records. However, the most recent developments have the potential to greatly increase public access to information about court cases. Once documents are filed in electronic form, they can be made available for the public to search on the Internet, via the court’s website, or a third party service provider. As several US judicial bodies, including the US Judicial Conference, the Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators, have identified, the transition to electronic case file systems raises important legal and policy issues that are not addressed explicitly in current law or access policies.
[Show full text]
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner Annual Report 2014–15
Annual Report 2014 –15 Annual Report 2014-15 ISSN 1839-5155 Creative Commons With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this report, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en). Content from this publication should be attributed as: Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, Annual Report 2014–15. Enquiries regarding the licence and any use of the Annual Report are welcome at: Office of the Australian Information Commissioner GPO Box 5218 Sydney NSW 2001 Telephone: 1300 363 992 Email: [email protected] Senator the Hon George Brandis QC Attorney-General Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Attorney I am delighted to provide to you, for presentation to the Parliament, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner’s (OAIC) Annual Report for the year ending 30 June 2015. Subsection 63(1) of the Public Service Act 1999 requires that I give this report to you to be tabled in the Parliament. Section 30 of the Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 (AIC Act) requires the Australian Information Commissioner to prepare an annual report under section 46 of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 on the OAIC’s operations, including a report on freedom of information matters (defined in section 31 of the AIC Act) and privacy matters (defined in section 32 of the AIC Act). The Annual Report includes reports on data collected from Australian Government ministers and agencies in relation to activity under the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
[Show full text]
2013 Conference Handbook and Program
AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF ARCHIVISTS 2013 CONFERENCE ARCHIVES • THE FUTURE CANBERRA • 15 – 18 OCTOBER 2013 contents PAGE 3 CONFERENCE ORGANISATION PAGE 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PAGE 4 SPONSORS PAGE 5 WELCOME PAGE 6 GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE 8 PROGRAM PAGE 12 SPEAKER & moderator BIOGRAPHIES CONFERENCE ORGANISATION The Australian Society of Archivists Canberra Conference is proudly hosted by the ACT Branch of the ASA. CONVENOR Michael Piggott COMMITTEE Tatiana Antsoupova (National Archives of Australia) Gina Grey (National Archives of Australia) Emma Jolley (National Library of Australia) Lorien Milligan (National Archives of Australia) Colleen McEwen Linda Macfarlane (National Archives of Australia) Liz Nannelli (AusAid) Michael Piggott Shirley Sullivan (National Archives of Australia) Lynda Weller (Territory Records Office) Stephen Yorke (Novar Collection) PROCEEDINGS EDITOR Maggie Shapley (ANU Archives) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Conference Committee would like to thank all those who have contributed to the organisation of the Conference, including relevant Council members. A special thanks is given to ASA member Barbara Hoffman for designing an inspirational Conference logo, the Program and for developing various promotion products. 2013 CONFERENCE • AustRAliAN sOCiEty OF ARChivISTS 3 SPONSORS The Australian Society of Archivists Council and 2013 Conference Organising Committee wish to acknowledge and thank the following sponsors for their generous contribution towards the 28th Australian Society of Archivists National Conference. PRINCIPAL SPONSOR SPONSORS 4 AustrAliAn society of ArchivISTS • 2013 CONFERENCE WELCOME messAGE FROM KYLIE PERCIVAL President, Australian Society of Archivists Welcome to Canberra and to Archives – The Future! This conference of the Australian Society of Archivists is the centrepiece of an annual program of activity designed to build the archives profession in Australia and benefit members of the ASA.
[Show full text]
Entries from the Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia
THE OXFORD COMPANION TO THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA Edited by TONY BLACKSHIELD MICHAEL COPER GEORGE WILLIAMS Research Assistants FRANCESCA DOMINELLO SUSAN PRIEST TROY SIMPSON OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Information technology election, by the use of advisory judicial appointment com- judgments. Database applications and web browsers are used missions, by a requirement for senate approval of appoint- to assist in research by Justices' staff and by the library. Other ments, or by a process of independent assessment of applications (for example, accounting packages) are used by proposed appointees. Whether any of these systems would be staff in the management of the Court. an improvement on the present system in Australia remains The Court's Registry uses a purpose-built case manage- open to debate. ment system that tracks matters from the time the first doc- NINIAN STEPHEN uments are filed until a decision is handed down and (if necessary) costs are taxed. The system also generates stan- Information technology. The Court has come a long way in dard correspondence from Registry staff to parties, as well as its use of information technology, or in the old terminology, providing statistical data for the Court's annual reports. The 'equipment', since 1903. A perusal of correspondence between case management system also holds contact information for the District Registrar in NSW and the Principal Registrar in the firms that represent parties in cases and for litigants in Melbourne reveals that office requisites then included such person, and a database of legal practitioners (barristers and items as ink wells, steel nibs for wooden pens, chalk (presum- solicitors).
[Show full text]
AIAL FORUM No. 78
Incorporating the 2014 National Lecture on Administrative Law by The Hon Wayne Martin AC, Chief Justice of Western Australia Editor: Elizabeth Drynan 78 Number MarchNovember 200 92014 Number 7860 a i a l FORUM Australian InstituteAustralian of Administrative Institute Lawof Incorporated. Administrative Law Inc. Editors:Editor:Alice Mantel Elizabeth Drynan EDITORIAL BOARD:BOARD: JusticeMr John Michael Carroll Barker ProfessorMr Mark Robin Robinson Creyke MsMr Alison Peter Playford Boyce Dr GeoffMr Chris Airo-Farulla Finn Dr Susan Kneebone Mr Rick Snell Professor Bill Lane Contributors are advised that articles published in the AIAL Forum are also reproduced on the AIAL website http://www.aial.org.au Contributors are advised that articles published in the AIAL Forum and the AUSTLII website http://www.austlii.edu.au are also reproduced on the AIAL website http://law.anu.edu.au/aial TheThe AIALAIAL ForumForum isis publishedpublished byby AustralianAustralian InstituteInstitute ofof AdministrativeAdministrative LawLaw Inc.Inc. ABNABN 9797 054054 164164 064064 POPO BoxBox 83,83, DeakinDeakin WestWest ACTACT 26002600 Ph:Ph: (02)(02) 62906290 15051505 Fax:Fax: (02)(02) 62906290 15801580 www.aial.org.auwww.aial.org.au ThisThis issueissue ofof thethe AIALAIAL ForumForum shouldshould bebe citedcited asas (2014)(2014) 7877 AIALAIAL Forum.Forum. TheThe InstituteInstitute isis alwaysalways pleasedpleased toto receivereceive paperspapers fromfrom writerswriters onon administrativeadministrative lawlaw whowho areare interestedinterested inin publicationpublication inin thethe AIALAIAL Forum.Forum. ItIt isis recommendedrecommended thatthat thethe stylestyle guideguide publishedpublished byby thethe FederalFederal LawLaw ReviewReview bebe usedused inin preparingpreparing manuscripts.manuscripts. ManuscriptsManuscripts shouldshould bebe sentsent toto thethe Editor,Editor, AIALAIAL ForumForum,, atat thethe aboveabove address.address. ArticlesArticles markedmarked ## havehave beenbeen refereedrefereed byby anan independentindependent academicacademic assessor.assessor.
[Show full text]
The State of the Judicature: a Statistical Profile of Australian Courts and Judges
The State of the Judicature: A Statistical Profile of Australian Courts and Judges Brian Opeskin∗ Abstract In 1977 Chief Justice Barwick gave one of the first statistical snapshots of the Australian courts as a ‘judicial system’ in his inaugural ‘State of the Australian Judicature’ address. Since then, there has been no detailed statistical examination of the characteristics of the Australian judicature, due in part to the paucity of reliable data. After the passage of 36 years, this article provides a second examination of Australian courts and judges using data from the Productivity Commission and other sources. The article describes and analyses key attributes and observable trends in the judicature from the perspectives of both the supply side (judicial labour) and the demand side (court lodgements). This is done across six domains: size and growth; tiers of the court hierarchy; state versus federal systems; civil versus criminal subject matter; regional dynamics; and gender composition. What emerges is a complex picture of a dynamic judicial system that does not always comport with common assumptions about its structure and organisation. There is a critical need for the collection of additional data on the judicature, and for research that provides a better understanding of the forces that will shape the evolution of the Australian judicial system over the coming decades. I Introduction In 1977 Chief Justice Barwick gave an inaugural address to the Australian Legal Convention on ‘The State of the Australian Judicature’,1 a practice that was followed at the biennial conference with few exceptions until the Conventions were abandoned in 2009 (see appendix).2 The address was intended as both an account of the distinctive features of the Australian judicial system and a call for reform in areas needing correction or development.
[Show full text]
The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia: Seniority
THE OXFORD COMPANION TO THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA Edited by TONY BLACKSHIELD MICHAEL COPER GEORGE WILLIAMS Research Assistants FRANCESCA DOMINELLO SUSAN PRIEST TROY SIMPSON OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Seniority In any event, while Rowell & Muston established that the Barwick's reasoning in Sprattv Hermes-using the applica- seat of government must be a 'place', the Court has remained tion of section 75(v) of the Constitution to decisions taken in unable to determine its precise location, and has usually the seat of government to exclude the conclusion that Chap- sidestepped the issue. Though Windeyer agreed in Rowell & ter III does not apply in the territories-is perhaps an excep- Muston that the seat of government is a 'place, a locality', he tion. In August 1999, when motorists passing the Indonesian also recalled his earlier view in Spratt v Hermes that it means Embassy repeatedly honked their horns in protest at violence 'a capital city'. As such, he said, it 'has never been taken to in East Timor, it was suggested that, if prosecuted, they might mean a precise area of the earth's surface delineated by metes invoke the constitutional freedom of political communica- and bounds, any more than has a seat oflearning, meaning a tion as a defence; and that idea, too, might gain weight from university town, or a place described as the seat of a bishop'. the fact that such protests are commonly directed to national He conceded that 'a power to make laws with respect to a embassies at the seat of government. place, if it be understood as a power
[Show full text]
Maverick Litigants.Indb
Maverick Litigants Maverick Litigants A History of Vexatious Litigants in Australia 1930–2008 Simon Smith Maverick Publications 2009 Published in Melbourne by Maverick Publications ABN 91374120334 13 Scott Street Elwood, Victoria 3184 Australia T: 03 9531 5278 E: [email protected] Copyright © Simon Smith 2009 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise) without the prior permission of the publisher. While every effort has been made to trace copyright in photos, copyright owners who have not been acknowledged should contact the publisher. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Smith, Simon. Maverick Litigants: a history of vexatious litigants in Australia 1930–2008 / Simon Smith. 1st ed. ISBN 978 0646514642 (pbk). Includes index. Bibliography. Actions and defences — Australia — History. Civil procedure — Australia — History. Pro se representation — Australia — History. Frivolous suits (Civil procedure) — Australia — History. 347.9405 Edited and indexed by Sandra McCullough, Kyneton Typeset by Last Word, Melbourne Printed and bound by BPA Print Group Pty Ltd, Burwood, Victoria, 3125 Australia Cover: Supreme Court building, corner of William and Little Bourke Streets, Melbourne. Melbourne Truth 1931. Courtesy State Library of Victoria. Design by Dominique Hanlon, Motion Advertising and Design Pty
[Show full text]