Radiology for Surgeons
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Melanoma of Urinary Bladder Presented As Acute Urine Retention. Nirmal Lamichhane1, Hari P Dhakal2 1Department of Surgical Oncology and 2Pathology, B
dd] fl] /on Sof fnf G;/ O] / c f : =s k L t k f = n L a B L . P A . T K I O P S IR O Nepalese Journal of Cancer (NJC) Volume 1 Issue 1 Page 67 - 70 A 2049BS/1992AD H BPKMCH LA BPKMCH,NEPAL R M CE EMORIAL CAN Case report Melanoma of Urinary Bladder presented as acute urine retention. Nirmal Lamichhane1, Hari P Dhakal2 1Department of Surgical Oncology and 2Pathology, B. P. Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital, Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal. ABSTRACT This report is of a 50-year-old man with a rare urinary bladder melanoma. He presented with hematuria followed by bladder outlet obstruction at the time of presentation. Ultrasonogram of the pelvis revealed a mass in the bladder outlet, suggestive of enlarged prostate. Suprapubic cystostomy was then performed. Subsequent transvesical exploration revealed a dark coloured mass at the outlet of bladder, which on histopathology confirmed to be melanoma. After ruling out other possible primary sites, he underwent radical cysto-urethrectomy with urinary diversion. Disease was confirmed with immunohistochemistry. Patient died after 3 months with bilateral lung metastasis. Keywords: Melanoma, Urinary bladder, Cystectomy, Prognosis. INTRODUCTION but was not successful. Sonography was performed Malignant melanoma of urinary bladder is a very rare which showed enlarged prostate and distended bladder. entity and scantly reported in medical literature. Wheelock Suprapubic cystostomy was performed that comforted was the first to report a primary melanoma of the urinary the patient. bladder in 1942, and Su et al. reported the next case in 1962.1, 2 Approximately 50 patients with this tumour On asking, he had voiding type lower urinary tract have been reported in the literature shown by Medline symptoms for 2 and half months, but had no haematuria search. -
Ureterolysis.Pdf
Information about your procedure from The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) This leaflet contains evidence-based information about your proposed urological procedure. We have consulted specialist surgeons during its preparation, so that it represents best practice in UK urology. You should use it in addition to any advice already given to you. To view the online version of this leaflet, type the text below into your web browser: http://www.baus.org.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/Patients/Leaflets/Ureterolysis.pdf Key Points • Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF), also known as chronic periaortitis, forms at the back of your abdominal (tummy) cavity and can block your ureters (the tubes that carry urine from your kidneys to your bladder) • Ureterolysis is used to free your ureters from the blockage caused by the RPF • In most patients, the procedure involves open surgery through a long incision in your abdomen (tummy) but it can sometimes be done by laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery • To prevent further obstruction, we wrap your ureters in omentum (the fatty envelope inside your abdomen) or in a synthetic material • The procedure is usually reserved for patients in whom medical treatment has been unsuccessful • Care of patients with RPF is multi-disciplinary with physicians, expert surgeons and other specialists collaborating in your care What does this procedure involve? Freeing your ureters from scar tissue at the back of your abdomen to relieve the blockage and restore urine drainage from your kidneys. To prevent recurrence, we wrap your ureters in omentum (a sheet of fatty tissue found in your abdomen); if your omentum has been removed or is too small to use, we may wrap the ureters in a synthetic material. -
Suprapubic Cystostomy: Urinary Tract Infection and Other Short Term Complications A.T
Suprapubic Cystostomy: Urinary Tract Infection and other short term Complications A.T. Hasan,Q. Fasihuddin,M.A. Sheikh ( Department of Urological Surgery and Transplantation, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi. ) Abstract Aims: To evaluate the frequency of urinary tract infection in patients with suprapubic cystostomy and other complications of the procedure within 30 days of placement. Methods: Patients characteristics, indication and types of cystostomy and short term (within 30 days); complications were analyzed in 91 patients. Urine analysis and culture was done in all patients to exclude those with urinary tract infection. After 15 and 30 days of the procedure, urine analysis and culture was repeated to evaluate the frequency of urinary tract infection. The prevalence of symptomatic bacteriuria with its organisms was assessed. Antibiotics were given to the postoperative and symptomatic patients and the relationship of antibiotics on the prevention of urinary tract infection was determined. Results: Of the 91 cases 88 were males and 3 females. The mean age was 40.52 ± 18.95 with a range of 15 to 82 years.Obstructive uropathy of lower urinary tract.was present in 81% cases and 17(18.6%) had history of trauma to urethra. All these cases had per-urethral bleeding on examination while x-ray urethrogram showed grade H or grade III injury of urethra. Eighty two of the procedures were performed per-cutaneously and 7 were converted to open cystostomies due to failure of per-cutaneous approach. Nine patients had exploratory laparotomy. Duration of catheterization was the leading risk factor for urinary tract infection found in 24.1% at 15 days and 97.8% at 30 days. -
Long-Term Indwelling Double-J Stent and Multiple Encrusted Stones in the Ureter and Bladder: a Case Report on Holmium Laser Treatment
Pediatr Urol Case Rep 2018; 5(6):161-164 DOI: 10.14534/j-pucr.2018645052 PEDIATRIC UROLOGY CASE REPORTS ISSN 2148-2969 http://www.pediatricurologycasereports.com Long-term indwelling double-J stent and multiple encrusted stones in the ureter and bladder: A case report on Holmium laser treatment Mehmet Hanifi Okur, Selcuk Otcu Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dicle University, School of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey ABSTRACT Double-J (D-J) stents are widely used in a variety of urological interventions. Forgotten D-J stents may lead to complications, such as migration, fragmentation and encrustation. We report the case of a forgotten stent, concomitant with ureteral and bladder stones. The forgotten D-J stent was placed four years prior to our intervention, during treatment for multiple right renal stones. Holmium laser lithotripsy was used to disrupt encrustations on a ureteral orifice and the ureteral stent. The percutaneous suprapubic cystostomy was removed without breaking the stent. The patient was discharged without further complications. Key Words: Double-J (D-J) stents; forgotten stent; encrustation; stone; Holmium laser lithotripsy. Copyright © 2018 pediatricurologycasereports.com Corresponding Author: Dr. Mehmet Hanifi Okur. endourological and open surgical methods Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dicle University, have been reported for the management of School of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey. forgotten D-J stents, there is no standardized E mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6720-1515 approach for their removal in adults and Received 2018-10-09, Accepted 2018-10-21 children [4]. Publication Date 2018-11-01 We report on a case of a forgotten D-J ureteral stent that had been placed during a Introduction percutaneous nephrolithotomy, four years Although Double-J (D-J) stents are widely prior to our intervention. -
An Unusual Consequence of Urinary Catheter Neglect: a Giant Bladder Stone
Int J Case Rep Images 2014;5(6):427–430. Agarwal et al. 427 www.ijcasereportsandimages.com CASE REPORT OPEN ACCESS An unusual consequence of urinary catheter neglect: A giant bladder stone Archana Agarwal, Justin Gould ABSTRACT How to cite this article Introduction: Indwelling urinary catheters cause Agarwal A, Gould J. An unusual consequence of a variety of complications including infections, urinary catheter neglect: A giant bladder stone. Int J pain and bleeding. Sometimes, the catheter Case Rep Images 2014;5(6):427–430. becomes encrusted and blocked. Case Report: A 66-year-old male was presented with increasing suprapubic pain for about two months because doi:10.5348/ijcri-201481-CR-10392 of a poorly draining Foley catheter. Two years earlier, the patient had undergone a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) gland. He was given a Foley catheter and asked to follow-up in a week. He did not follow-up or change the catheter INTRODUCTION for two years. The catheter could not be removed. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen Indwelling urinary catheters cause a variety of showed a large encrustation of 5.0x5.2x5.5 cm complications including infections, pain and bleeding [1]. surrounding the Foley. The patient underwent Sometimes, the catheter becomes encrusted and blocked open suprapubic cystostomy with intact retrieval [1]. We present a case of a giant bladder stone formation of stone along with the catheter. Conclusion: in a patient who did not change the catheter for more Indwelling Foley catheters frequently become than two years. encrusted and may become difficulty to remove. -
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach Ste´Fanie A
CASE REPORT Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach Ste´fanie A. Seixas-Mikelus, MD, Susan J. Marshall, MD, D. Dawon Stephens, DO, Aaron Blumenfeld, MD, Eric D. Arnone, BA, Khurshid A. Guru, MD ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Objectives: To evaluate our case of robot-assisted ureter- Ureteral obstruction secondary to extrinsic compression re- olysis (RU), describe our surgical technique, and review sults from both benign and malignant processes. Retroperi- the literature on minimally invasive ureterolysis. toneal fibrosis (RPF) and ureteral endometriosis (UE) are 2 uncommon conditions that cause ureteral obstruction.1–25 Methods: One patient managed with robot-assisted ure- terolysis for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis was identi- First described in 1905 by Albarran and then by Ormond fied. The chart was analyzed for demographics, operative in 1948, RPF is a chronic inflammatory process character- parameters, and immediate postoperative outcome. The ized by deposition of dense fibrous tissue within the surgical technique was assessed and modified. Lastly, a retroperitoneum.26–28 Possible causes of RPF include med- review of the published literature on ureterolysis managed ications, infections, malignancy, inflammatory conditions, with minimally invasive surgery was performed. trauma, prior surgeries, and radiation therapy. About two- thirds of cases are considered idiopathic.10,25 Results: One patient underwent robot-assisted ureteroly- sis at our institution in 2 separate settings. Operative time Endometriosis, defined by the ectopic presence of endo- (OR) decreased from 279 minutes to 191 minutes. Esti- metrium, is another entity that can cause ureteral obstruc- mated blood loss (EBL) was less than 50mL. The patient tion. -
EAU Guidelines on Bladder Stones 2019
EAU Guidelines on Bladder Stones C. Türk (Chair), A. Skolarikos (Vice-chair), J.F. Donaldson, A. Neisius, A. Petrik, C. Seitz, K. Thomas Guidelines Associate: Y. Ruhayel © European Association of Urology 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Aims and Scope 3 1.2 Panel Composition 3 1.3 Available Publications 3 1.4 Publication History and Summary of Changes 3 1.4.1 Publication History 3 2. METHODS 3 2.1 Data Identification 3 2.2 Review 4 3. GUIDELINES 4 3.1 Prevalence, aetiology and risk factors 4 3.2 Diagnostic evaluation 4 3.2.1 Diagnostic investigations 5 3.3 Disease Management 5 3.3.1 Conservative treatment and Indications for active stone removal 5 3.3.2 Medical management of bladder stones 5 3.3.3 Bladder stone interventions 5 3.3.3.1 Suprapubic cystolithotomy 5 3.3.3.2 Transurethral cystolithotripsy 5 3.3.3.2.1 Transurethral cystolithotripsy in adults: 5 3.3.3.2.2 Transurethral cystolithotripsy in children: 6 3.3.3.3 Percutaneous cystolithotripsy 6 3.3.3.3.1 Percutaneous cystolithotripsy in adults: 6 3.3.3.3.2 Percutaneous cystolithotripsy in children: 6 3.3.3.4 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) 6 3.3.3.4.1 SWL in Adults 6 3.3.3.4.2 SWL in Children 6 3.3.4 Treatment for bladder stones secondary to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in adult men 7 3.3.5 Urinary tract reconstructions and special situations 7 3.3.5.1 Neurogenic bladder 7 3.3.5.2 Bladder augmentation 7 3.3.5.3 Urinary diversions 7 4. -
Suprapubic Catheter Insertion Using an Ultrasound-Guided Technique and Literature Review BJUIBJU INTERNATIONAL Preman Jacob , Bhavan Prasad Rai * and Alistair W
Suprapubic catheter insertion using an ultrasound-guided technique and literature review BJUIBJU INTERNATIONAL Preman Jacob , Bhavan Prasad Rai * and Alistair W. Todd Department of Radiology , * Department of Urology, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK Accepted for publication 9 November 2011 Suprapubic catheter (SPC) insertion is a What ’ s known on the subject? and What does the study add? common method of bladder drainage in The conventional ‘ blind ’ technique for suprapubic catheter (SPC) insertion relies on contemporary urological practice. The adequate fi lling of the bladder to displace bowel away from the site of needle procedure involves insertion of a sharp puncture. However, in a small percentage of patients this fails to happen, which trocar into the bladder percutaneously, can occasionally lead to life-threatening bowel injury. Recently published British usually by palpation, percussion or Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) guidelines have recommended that cystoscopy for guidance. Although ultrasonography (US) may be helpful to identify bowel loops and recommends its generally considered a safe procedure, the usage whenever possible. risk of bowel injury is estimated at up to 2.4% with a mortality rate of 1.8%. This paper describes the technique of US-guided needle puncture and SPC insertion Recently published British Association of to reduce the likelihood of bowel injury. The paper addresses training, equipment Urological Surgeons (BAUS) guidelines have and logistical issues associated with this advice. We have reviewed the available recommended that ultrasonography (US) publications on the outcomes from this technique and also present our experience. may be helpful to identify bowel loops and recommends its usage whenever possible. -
Suprapubic Cystostomy and Nephrostomy Care This Brochure Will Help You Learn How to Care for Your Catheter
Northwestern Memorial Hospital Patient Education CARE AND TREATMENT Suprapubic Cystostomy and Nephrostomy Care This brochure will help you learn how to care for your catheter. The following are general guidelines. If you have any questions or concerns, please ask your physician or nurse. Wash your A suprapubic cystostomy is a surgical Figure 1. Suprapubic hands carefully opening made into the bladder directly cystostomy above the pubic bone. A tube (catheter) before and is inserted into the bladder. The catheter is held in place by a balloon or sutures. after changing Urine flows through the catheter into a Catheter drainage bag (Figure 1). the bandage or A nephrostomy tube works much the same way, except: Tape drainage bag. ■ The surgical opening is made into the kidney. Drainage bag ■ The catheter is held in place by sutures and/or a wax wafer with a catheter holder (Figure 2). Figure 2. Nephrostomy General guidelines It is important to keep the area around the catheter site clean. Change the gauze bandage every day or any time it comes off. Change the catheter tape when it becomes soiled or loose. When taping the catheter to your skin, make sure the catheter is not kinked. If your skin is sensitive to adhesive bandage tape, use a Catheter non-allergenic tape. Wash your hands carefully before and after changing the bandage Tape or drainage bags. Avoid pulling on the catheter or tube. Do not clamp your catheter or tube. You may notice dried crusts around the outside of the catheter. These can be removed by gently wiping with a wet washcloth. -
Urinary Tract Infection
Urinary Tract Infection Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a term that is applied to a variety of clinical conditions ranging from the asymptomatic presence of bacteria in the urine to severe infection of the kidney with resultant sepsis. UTI is one of the more common medical problems. It is estimated that 150 million patients are diagnosed with a UTI yearly, resulting in at least $6 billion in healthcare expenditures. UTIs are at times difficult to diagnose; some cases respond to a short course of a specific antibiotic, while others require a longer course of a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Accurate diagnosis and treatment of a UTI is essential to limit its associated morbidity and mortality and avoid prolonged or unnecessary use of antibiotics. Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of UTI, the development of new diagnostic tests, and the introduction of new antimicrobial agents have allowed physicians to appropriately tailor specific treatment for each patient. EPIDEMIOLOGY Approximately 7 million cases of acute cystitis are diagnosed yearly in young women; this likely is an underestimate of the true incidence of UTI because at least 50% of all UTIs do not come to medical attention. The major risk factors for women 16–35 years of age are related to sexual intercourse and diaphragm use. Later in life, the incidence of UTI increases significantly for both males and females. For women between 36 and 65 years of age, gynecologic surgery and bladder prolapse appear to be important risk factors. In men of the same age group, prostatic hypertrophy/obstruction, catheterization, and surgery are relevant risk factors. -
Contd... Supplementary Table 1: Contd
Supplementary Table1: Illustrates the main studies with ureteral endometriosis and their characteristics Author/year Journal Type of Number of Mean Ureteral Histological Management, n (%) study cases (n) age localization, n (%) type, n (%) Huang et al./2017 J Obstet RS 46 37.07 26 (56.5%) left, 22 (47.8%) 11 ureterolysis (23.9%), 28 (60.9%) Gynaecol Res 16 (34.8%) right, intrinsic, ureteroneocystostomy, 4 (8.7%) 4 (8.7%) bilateral 24 (52.2%) end‑to‑end ureteral anastomosis, extrinsic 3 (6.5%) nephrectomy Freire et al./2017 Urology RS 17 38 35.7% left, 14.3% 14.3% extrinsic, 7 distal ureterectomy, right, 10.7% bilateral 14.3% intrinsic 5 distal ureterectomy, and reimplantation (4 Lich‑Gregoir and 1 Lich‑Gregoir with psoas hitch), 3 ureteroureterostomy, 2 laparoscopic nephrectomy Kanno et al./2017 The Journal CR 1 25 100% right NR Laparoscopic segmental ureteral of Minimally resection and submucosal Invasive tunneling ureteroneocystostomy Gynecology with a psoas hitch and Boari flap Darwish et al./2017 J Minim RS 42 34.8 8 (19%) bilateral, 54.5% intrinsic 78% ureterolysis, 8% ureteral Invasive 17 (40.5%) right, resection followed by Gynecol 17 (40.5%) left end‑to‑end anastomosis, 14% ureteral resection and ureteroneocysostomy Alves et al./2017 J Minim RS 198 NR 7 (25%) left, 9 (32.1%) 76.9% intrinsic 100% ureterolysis, 6.06% Invasive right, 12 (42.9%) ureteral resection followed by Gynecol bilateral end‑to‑end anastomosis, 1 (0.5%) ureteroneocystostomy with Boari flap Abo et al./2016 Journal de RS 13 36 NR NR 11 (84.7%) advanced ureterolysis -
Urological Complications in Renal Transplantation
Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal Manuscript 2015 Urological Complications in Renal Transplantation Riad N. Farah Richard Klugo Thomas Mertz Joseph C. Cerny Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/hfhmedjournal Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Medical Specialties Commons, and the Public Health Commons Henry Ford Hosp Med Journal Vol 26, No 3, 1978 Urological Complications in Renal Transplantation Riad N. Farah, MD,* Richard Klugo, MD,* Thomas Mertz, MD,* and Joseph C. Cerny, MD' There were 116 renal transplants performed on 108 patients RAFT survival after renal transplantation depends upon over a five-year period at Henry Ford Hospital with three the vascular and urinary anastomosis as well as control of major urological complications. The rate of 2.6% compares graft rejection. Numerous factors contribute to good results favorably with that reported in other series. Careful pre in transplantation, among which are immediate function of operative urological evaluation together with technically the homograft, high degree of histocompatibility, the avoid precise ureteroneocystostomy are factors that minimize the ance of excessive immunosuppression, and minimal wound incidence of urological complications. and urological complications. There have been several reportsof urological complications following renal transplantation (See Table). Complication rates as high as 25.7%' have been reported with ureteropyelostomy, while the rates for ureteroneocystos tomy range from 15%^ to less than 1%.' In our review of 116 renal transplants we found three urological complications (2.6%). This rate compares favorably wfth that reported in earlier series and underscores the importance ofthe urolo gist in the work-up and management of the transplant recipient.