Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 562–568
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Hazardous Materials
j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhazmat
Improvement of the cloud point extraction of uranyl ions by the
addition of ionic liquids
∗
Song Gao, Taoxiang Sun, Qingde Chen, Xinghai Shen
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), Radiochemistry and Radiation Chemistry Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science, College of
Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
h i g h l i g h t s g r a p h i c a l a b s t r a c t
•
CnmimNTf2 improves cloud point
2+
extraction of UO2 with neutral extractant.
•
The extraction efficiency keeps high
at both nearly neutral and acidic con- dition.
•
The addition of C4mimNTf2 increases
2+
the separation factor of UO2 and La3+.
•
The interaction of the IL anion with
micelle induces the synergistic effect.
• − −
TOPO, NTf2 and NO3 establish a soft
2+
template for UO2 in the micelle.
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The cloud point extraction (CPE) of uranyl ions by different kinds of extractants in Triton X-114 (TX-114)
Received 27 April 2013
micellar solution was investigated upon the addition of ionic liquids (ILs) with various anions, i.e., bromide
Received in revised form 22 August 2013 − − −
(Br ), tetrafluoroborate (BF4 ), hexafluorophosphate (PF6 ) and bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide
Accepted 8 October 2013 − −
(NTf ). A significant increase of the extraction efficiency was found on the addition of NTf based ILs
Available online 16 October 2013 2 2
when using neutral extractant tri-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO), and the extraction efficiency kept high
at both nearly neutral and high acidity. However, the CPE with acidic extractants, e.g., bis(2-ethylhexyl)
Keywords:
phosphoric acid (HDEHP) and 8-hydroxyquinoline (8-HQ) which are only effective at nearly neutral con-
Uranium 19
dition, was not improved by ILs. The results of zeta potential and F NMR measurements indicated that
Cloud point extraction −
the anion NTf2 penetrated into the TX-114 micelles and was enriched in the surfactant-rich phase during Ionic liquids
− 2+
the CPE process. Meanwhile, NTf2 may act as a counterion in the CPE of UO2 by TOPO. Furthermore,
2+ 3+
the addition of IL increased the separation factor of UO2 and La , which implied that in the micelle
− − 2+
TOPO, NTf2 and NO3 established a soft template for UO2 . Therefore, the combination of CPE and IL
2+
provided a supramolecular recognition to concentrate UO2 efficiently and selectively.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction to several advantages including high efficiency and concentration
factor, low cost, safety, environmentally friendly nature and versa-
Cloud point extraction (CPE), a micelle-mediated process, has tility offered by this particular technique [1–4]. The methodology
become one of the most preferred preconcentration and separation used is based on the fact that the micellar solution of non-ionic sur-
methods improving the sensitivity in trace metal ions determina- factants becomes turbid and separates into a concentrated phase
tion and acting as an alternative to liquid–liquid extraction, owing containing most of the surfactant and a dilute aqueous phase,
when heated beyond a temperature called cloud point (CP). The
hydrophobic metallic chelates can remain preferentially in the
∗ micellar phase, thus being extracted into the surfactant-rich phase
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 10 62765915; fax: +86 10 62759191.
at a temperature above CP [2,4].
E-mail address: [email protected] (X. Shen).
0304-3894/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.014
S. Gao et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 562–568 563
−
−
Scheme 1. The structures of the IL cations, the IL anion NTf2 , the surfactant TX-114, and the extractants used in this work.
CPE has been used to design efficient extraction procedures 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (CnmimBF4)
for the separation, preconcentration or purification of a variety [30–32] and hydrophobic ILs, e.g., 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium
of metal ions, such as transition metal ions (e.g., Pb(II), Cu(II)) hexafluorophosphate (C4mimPF6) [33,34], were utilized in the
[5–7] and rare earth metal ions (e.g., Gd(III), Eu(III)) [8,9]. Fur- modification of the physicochemical properties of the aqueous
thermore, it can be incorporated into several analytical techniques solutions of surfactants [29–37]. Also, the interaction mechanisms
such as Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS) and Induc- between ILs and micelles have been investigated. It was found
tively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) [2]. that the properties of micellar solution such as critical micelliza-
Uranium is a significant element acting as nuclear fuel for elec- tion concentration (CMC), aggregation number, aggregate size,
tricity production in power plants, which is also known to cause and dipolarity of micellar pseudo-phase can be altered by the
acute toxicological effects for human [10]. Hence, for both econ- addition of ILs. Although the modifications of these properties are
omy and environmental safety, it needs monitoring and recovering significant, their practical applications are very few. Besides, ILs
from the aqueous solution derived from both fabrication and repro- have received increasing attention in liquid–liquid extraction of
cessing of spent nuclear fuel, which is usually controlled at a high metal ions because of their unique properties and they can provide
acidic [11]. CPE has been used in the preconcentration of U(VI) an ionic environment for metal complexes, which improves the
for analysis and recovery [10,12–15]. The hydrophobic chelating extraction efficiency [23–28]. A possible strategy is to introduce ILs
agents, such as dibenzoylmethane (DBM) [10], 8-hydroxyquinoline in CPE to improve the extraction of metal ions. As far as we know,
(8-HQ) [13] and 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN) [14] have been the IL C4mimPF6 was reported to synergistically enhance the CPE
introduced into the CPE procedure of U(VI). The extraction effi- of Ni(II) using diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) as extractant [38].
2+
ciency of UO2 by CPE using acidic extractants is usually very However, the system is only effective at pH above 6, and the
high at nearly neutral conditions but limited at high acidity [13]. mechanism is not clear [38].
The neutral extractant tributyl phosphate (TBP), which has high In this work, we try to study the influence of ILs with dif-
extraction efficiency at acidic condition in liquid–liquid extraction ferent anions and cations, e.g., C4mimBr, C4mimBF4, C4mimPF6,
2+ −
system, was also applied in the CPE of UO2 . But the maximum CnmimNTf2 (NTf2 is bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide, n = 4, 6,
2+
efficiency was only 60% at pH 4 and decreased to 10% at pH 2 [15]. 8, 10, 12) on CPE of UO2 . Different kinds of extractants are
Thus, an important improvement of the CPE method is to make it used, including tri-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO), 8-HQ and bis(2-
efficiently apply at both nearly neutral and acidic conditions. ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (HDEHP). The structures of the IL
−
It has been demonstrated that CPE can be improved by many cations, the IL anion NTf2 , the surfactant TX-114, and the extract-
methods, e.g., changing the micellization of surfactant, increasing ants used in this work are shown in Scheme 1. More importantly,
the solubility of micelles and optimizing the extractants. The first we try to give an understanding of the mechanism of CPE in the
two methods are related to the physicochemical properties of a conjunction with IL to separate metal ions.
non-ionic surfactant solution, which can be adjusted by adding
modifiers, e.g., ionic surfactants [16–22]. For example, a CPE proce-
dure based on a mixed surfactant medium consisting of the anionic 2. Experimental
surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and the non-ionic Triton
X-114 (TX-114) has been designed to extract Cr(III) [16]. The above 2.1. Materials
system combines both the hydrophobic and electrostatic interac-
tions within the same extraction system. TX-114 (>98%) was obtained from Alfa Aesar and used
Ionic liquids (ILs), which are composed of organic cations and as received. C4mimBr, C4mimBF4, C4mimPF6, LiNTf2, BuPyNTf2
+ +
organic/inorganic anions, have received increasing attention in (BuPy is 1-butylpyridinium), Py1,4NTf2 (Py1,4 is N-butyl-
+
many research fields because of their unique properties such as N-methylpyrrolidinium) and PP1,4NTf2 (PP1,4 is N-butyl-N-
low melting points, negligible vapor pressure, non-flammability, methylpiperidinium) were purchased from Lanzhou Institute
and environmental benign [23–28]. Recently, both hydrophilic of Chemical Physics, China, and their purities were all over
ILs, e.g., 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide (CnmimBr) [29], 99%. CnmimNTf2 (n = 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) were synthesized via
564 S. Gao et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 562–568
metathetical reaction and purified according to the method 90
in the literature [39]. HDEHP (CP, Sinopharm) was puri-
80
fied by copper salt crystallization [40]. TOPO (Acros), 8-HQ
(Sinopharm), SDS (Beijing Chemical Plant), sodium dodecyl 70
sulfonate (SDSN, Sinopharm), Cetyltrimethylammonium bro-
mide (CTAB, Sinopharm), UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (Chemapol) and 60
La(NO ) ·6H O (Beijing Chemical Plant) were of analytical grade
3 3 2 50
and used without further purification. /%
U 40
E
2.2. Instruments and methods
30
In a typical CPE process, 10 mL of the aqueous solution con- 20
−3 −3
taining TX-114 (10 mmol dm ), an IL (1 mmol dm ), NaNO3
−3 −3 10
(0.1 mol dm ), an extractant (0.5 mmol dm ), and UO2(NO3)2
−3
(0.05 mmol dm ) were shaken for 2 h followed by standing for
◦ 0
2 h at 70 C. These experimental conditions were chosen to min- 0123 4567891011
imize the volume of surfactant-rich phase and to obtain a suitable
A dditive
efficiency range to discuss (see ESI). Separation of the two phases
was achieved by centrifugation for 5 min at 4000 rpm. The aque- 2+
Fig. 1. The CPE efficiency of UO2 by TOPO in the absence (0) and presence
2+ −3
ous phase was removed and the content of UO2 was analyzed by of 1 mmol dm of C4mimBr (1), C4mimBF4 (2), C4mimPF6 (3), C4mimNTf2 (4),
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer (ICP- BuPyNTf2 (5), Py1,4NTf2 (6), PP1,4NTf2 (7), LiNTf2 (8), SDS (9), SDSN (10), CTAB (11).
AES, Leeman, USA). The extraction efficiency E was calculated by the following equations: C mimBr n
C mimNTf C V − C V
i i f f 80 n 2
E = × 100% C V
i i
where Ci is the initial concentration of metal ion in the micellar 60
solution, Cf is the final concentration of metal ion in aqueous phase
after CPE, V is the volume of the micellar solution and V is the
i f )
volume of aqueous phase after CPE. (%
40
U
The zeta potential experiments were performed on a Nano ZS90
19 E
instrument (Malvern, UK). F NMR spectra were recorded on an
AV400 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) and the concen-
− 20
tration of NTf2 in the surfactant-rich phase was obtained by the
19 −
area ratio of F NMR signal of NTf2 to the CF3 peak of ben-
zotrifluoride (C6H5CF3). In detail, the surfactant-rich phase was
0
diluted with ethanol to 1 mL. Then approximate 300 L samples
468 10 12
were added to an NMR tube within a stem coaxial capillary tube n
containing C6H5CF3 dissolved in d-acetone as external reference.
Area integral of each peak near −81.10 ppm, which referred to the 2+
− Fig. 2. The CPE efficiency of UO2 by TOPO in the presence of CnmimBr
− −
− 3 3
assigned value 1.00 of 63.90 ppm, was proportional to the NTf2 (1 mmol dm ) and CnmimNTf2 (1 mmol dm ) with the variation of the alkyl length
concentration. of imidazolium cation.
3. Results and discussion However, the addition of CTAB reduces the extraction efficiency to
34%.
3.1. Effect of ILs on CPE Fig. 2 shows the effect of the alkyl length of the imidazolium
cation on the extraction efficiency. In TOPO-CnmimNTf2 systems,
Four imidazolium based ILs with different anions, i.e., C4mimBr, while the extraction efficiency is enhanced greatly by the pres-
2+
C4mimBF4, C4mimPF6, C4mimNTf2 were tested for CPE of UO2 ence of ILs, it changes to a small extent within the scope from 70%
with a neutral extractant TOPO in TX-114 micellar solution and the to 80% as the alkyl moiety lengthens from C4 to C12. Especially,
results are shown in Fig. 1. The extraction efficiency is only about C10mimNTf2 and C12mimNTf2 increase the extraction efficiency
45% in the absence of ILs. C4mimBr and C4mimPF6 show little effect a little more obviously. In contrast, on the addition of CnmimBr
2+
on UO2 extraction and C4mimBF4 decreases the extraction effi- the extraction efficiency changes slightly when the alkyl moiety
ciency. On the contrary, the extraction efficiency shows an obvious changes from C4 to C8, but decreases when the alkyl chain length-
−
increase to nearly 75% as the hydrophobic IL C4mimNTf2 is added. ens to C10 and C12. Once again, one can see that NTf2 plays an
− + + 2+
Other NTf2 based ILs with different cations, i.e., BuPy , Py1,4 and important role in the improvement of CPE of UO2 by TOPO in
+
PP1,4 , provide similar effect on CPE. Meanwhile, the addition of TX-114 micellar solution.
LiNTf2 also improves the efficiency to 63%. All above results imply
−
that NTf2 plays an important role in the extraction. However, in 3.2. Effect of acidity on CPE
the absence of the extractant TOPO, the addition of C4mimNTf2
2+
shows no effect on the extraction (Fig. S3). For comparison, three The effect of ILs on CPE of UO2 by TOPO was also examined in
common ionic surfactants, i.e., SDS, SDSN and CTAB, were also used different concentrations of nitric acid (see Fig. 3a). In the absence
as additives at the same molar concentrations as the ionic liquids. of ILs, TOPO displays relatively low extraction efficiency in nearly
The additions of SDS and SDSN improve the extraction efficiencies neutral condition, and the extraction efficiency increases when the
to 64% and 49%, respectively, lower than that in CnmimNTf2 system. acidity becomes high, due to the increase of the concentration of
S. Gao et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 562–568 565
−
−
2+ 3+
C , Fig. 4. The extraction efficiency of UO2 and La depending on 0 HNO3 in the sep-
2+ 3+
aration of UO2 () and La () by TOPO in the absence (a) and presence (b) of
−3 2+ 3+
1 mmol dm of C4mimNTf2. UO2 and La coexist in aqueous phase and their
−3
initial concentrations are both 0.05 mmol dm .
2+
On the contrary, the extraction efficiency in the CPE of UO2
using 8-HQ and HDEHP decreases dramatically on the addition
−3
of acid and cannot be improved by the addition of 1 mmol dm
of C4mimNTf2 (Fig. 3b and c). The extraction efficiency of 8-HQ
is ∼90% when no extra acid exists, and decreases rapidly as only
−3
0.001 mol dm of HNO3 added, due to the fact that the neutral
species [UO2-(8-HQ)2] is very sensitive to the acidity and disso-
2+
ciates in acidic condition [13]. One can see that the CPE of UO2
using 8-HQ is only effective at pH over 4 (Fig. 3b, inset), in spite of
2+
Fig. 3. Effect of the acidity on the CPE efficiency of UO2 by different extractants
−3 the IL C4mimNTf2 added. In HDEHP system, though the efficiency
(TOPO (a), 8-HQ (b), HDEHP (c)) in the absence () and presence of 1 mmol dm −3
C < .
−3 increases at low acidity ( 0,HNO 0 05 mol dm ), it decreases
of C4mimNTf2 () or 1 mmol dm of SDS (). The inset is the magnifying plot from 3
−6 −3
3 × 10 to 0.015 mol dm of 8-HQ. rapidly with the increase of acidity, no matter whether C4mimNTf2 exists.
− 2+ 3+
the counterion NO3 . The extraction efficiency begins to decrease 3.3. Separation of UO2 /La
−3
at the 1 mol dm of acid concentration, owing to the competition
2+ +
between UO2 and H to coordinate with TOPO. As C4mimNTf2 In TRPO (trialkylphosphine oxide with alkyl chain from C6 to C8)
is added into TOPO system, the extraction efficiency keeps high process [41], TRPO has excellent extraction selectivity to tri-, tetra-
at both low and high acidities, with a trend similar to that in the and hexa-valent actinides and could extract tri-valent lanthanides
−3
absence of IL, except a lower HNO3 concentration corresponding to when the concentration of HNO3 lowers than 2 mol dm . To inves-
2+
the maximum of Eu. When no extra HNO3 is added, the extraction tigate the selectivity of TOPO in CPE, the separation of UO2 and
3+ 3+ 3+
efficiency is improved on the addition of SDS. However, as extra Ln was studied (La was selected as representative of Ln ).
2+ 3+
HNO3 is added, the added SDS shows little influence on the effi- Fig. 4 shows the extraction efficiency of UO2 and La depend-
2+ 3+
C , ciency. This may be attributed to the protonation of the anion of ing on 0 HNO3 in the separation of UO2 and La . In single TOPO
3+
SDS. system, the presence of La decreases the extraction efficiency
566 S. Gao et al. / Journal of Hazardous Materials 263 (2013) 562–568
−3 −3
of the system containing 10 mmol dm of TX-114, 0.2 mmol dm
−3
of TOPO and 1 mmol dm C12mimNTf2 is below 273.2 K, so the