Ingemar Ståhl. a Market Liberal in the Swedish Welfare State Jonung, Lars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ingemar Ståhl. a Market Liberal in the Swedish Welfare State Jonung, Lars Ingemar Ståhl. A Market Liberal in the Swedish Welfare State Jonung, Lars; Jonung, Christina 2020 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Jonung, L., & Jonung, C. (2020). Ingemar Ståhl. A Market Liberal in the Swedish Welfare State. Stockholm: Dialogos. Total number of authors: 2 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 INGEMAR STÅHL A Market Liberal in the Swedish Welfare State Christina and Lars Jonung (eds.) INGEMAR STÅHL A Market Liberal in the Swedish Welfare State Dialogos Dialogos Förlag Odengatan 36 113 51 Stockholm [email protected] www.dialogosforlag.se Ingemar Ståhl – A Market Liberal in the Swedish Welfare State Christina and Lars Jonung (eds.) First edition First printing Copyright © 2020 by Dialogos Förlag 2020 Design: RPform, Richard Persson Jacket photo: Per Lindström Print: ScandBook AB, Falun 2020 ISBN 978-91-7504-371-5 List of contents Preface ........................................ 7 Introduction .................................... 9 LarS JoNuNg 1. Ingemar Ståhl 1938-2014. A Portrait. .............. 11 INgemar StåhL 2. The Rise and Fall of Index Loans in Sweden........ 65 INgemar StåhL 3. Ownership and Control in Business Enterprises ..... 77 INgemar StåhL 4. Problems of Information in Economic Policy ....... 105 INgemar StåhL 5. It Will Soon Be 1984 … ........................ 123 INgemar StåhL 6. What is Wrong with the Welfare State? ........... 135 INgemar StåhL 7. A Coasean Journey through Estonia – A Study of Property Rights and Transaction Costs .......... 155 Preface This is a book about Ingemar Ståhl, a prominent professor of eco- nomics in Sweden. We first met him as graduate students in Lund in the late 1960s. We became friends and eventually colleagues at the department of economics. The friendship soon involved our families. Our contact with Ingemar lasted until his passing in 2014. To honor Ingemar Ståhl we edited a book in Swedish, published in 2018, where former students and colleagues pay their tribute to him. In addition, the book contains a selection of reprinted articles by him. Eventually, we decided to also publish a book in English about Ingemar Ståhl, although much shorter than the Swedish version. Our aim with this volume is to present him to an international audience as he made significant contributions to economic policies and public debate in Sweden during the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, worth a wider attention. We have many debts concerning this volume. We are indebted to all those who contributed to the Swedish edition, to Alan Harkess for skillfully translating from Swedish chapter 1, 3 and 5 and to the Ståhl family for their help. We want to thank Adri De Ridder, Oskar Grevesmühl, Daniel Klein and David Warsh for insightful and constructive comments. We owe a special thanks to Kurt Schuler for adjusting our text to U.S. readers and to Geoffrey Wood for making it more accessible for UK readers. We are also grateful to our friend and publisher Torgny Wadensjö at Dialogos for his support. This book was made possible by generous financial assistance from Karl Staaffs fond, Sven och Dagmar Saléns stiftelse and Thora Ohlssons stiftelse. Lund in March 2020 Christina and Lars Jonung Introduction INgemar StåhL (1938–2014) made important contributions to eco- nomics and economic policy in Sweden. He is little known outside of Sweden as he mainly wrote in Swedish. This book gives a broad account of Ståhl’s life and works. It is based on our Swedish book, Ingemar Ståhl – en ekonom för blandekonomin, published in 2018 by the Swedish publisher Dialogos. The Swedish title means Ingemar Ståhl – an economist for the mixed economy. We chose it because one of Ståhl’s most prominent papers dealt with the proper economic theory for analyzing the mixed economy, that is, a market economy with a large public sector. However, the term “mixed economy” is little used today in Sweden or elsewhere; instead, the focus has shifted to the welfare state. For this reason, and because Ståhl studied many aspects of the welfare state, we have changed the title for the English version to Ingemar Ståhl – A Market Liberal in the Swedish Welfare State. The English volume is a condensed version of the Swedish one. Chapter 1 is a portrait of Ingemar Ståhl as an economist, describ- ing his engagement over time in many fields, and evaluating his contribution to Swedish economics and economic policies. Six papers by Ståhl follow, selected to give a flavor of his broad interests. Chapter 2 reflects his work on indexed loans in the 1960s, a source of inspiration for the successful Swedish system for student loans and subsidies designed by him. He also explained why a type of indexed loans for Sweden’s housing sector introduced in the 1970s failed. Chapter 3 contains Ståhl’s seminal critique of wage earner funds that were proposed by a study commissioned by Sweden’s powerful central trade union confederation in 1975. Here he employed the theory of contracts and transaction costs developed by economists such as Ronald Coase and Armen Alchian to explain the conse- quences of making trade unions the sole owners of Swedish firms. 10 Ingemar Ståhl – a market lIberal In the SwedISh welfare State In Chapter 4, Ståhl considers the challenges facing an econo- mist who wants to inform politicians and voters about “rational decisions” concerning economic policy. This chapter mirrors his experience as a member of various government commissions, as policy advisor and as a highly active participant in the public de- bate. He found that the advice of the enlightened economist was often ignored. Here he gives his explanation for this fact. Chapter 5 is a satirical newspaper article published on New Year’s Eve of 1979. It shows Ståhl as a witty debater, adopting new and unexpected perspectives. The article is a warning that the generous Swedish welfare state may turn into a hard Orwellian version of itself if it tries to combat tax evasion by the registration of all sales and purchases. In the 1970s and 1980s, the public sector grew rapidly in Sweden, reaching unprecedented levels. Ståhl was fascinated by this process, writing about it in numerous contributions in Swedish. Chapter 6 summarizes his explanation of the driving forces behind the ex- pansion of the welfare state. To him, the Swedish public sector was too big. It might be reduced by a constitutional reform introducing qualified majorities for decisions by the parliament. Ever since his work in the 1960s for the research institute of the Swedish defense, Ståhl had a deep interest in the Baltic states. They provided the military bases for the Soviet Union that would be used for any military operation against Sweden. Following the collapse of the Soviet empire, he travelled to the Baltics in the early 1990s. Chapter 7 is a report from his journey “through the Estonian economic landscape”, using as his guide the work by Ronald Coase on property rights and transaction costs. Chapter 7 reflects Ståhl’s interest in property rights, contracts and law and economics. He tried to introduce these concepts in his teaching at the department of economics at Lund University. Eventually, he became so focused on the relationship between economics and law that he spent his last years as professor at the university’s Faculty of Law. LarS JoNuNg Chapter 1. Ingemar Ståhl 1938-2014. A Portrait For many decades, Ingemar Ståhl was a well-known economist in Sweden. He introduced new perspectives into economic debate, research and teaching. He made his presence felt in areas as di- verse as defense economics, rent controls, energy policy, financial economics, industrial policy, higher education, wage earner funds, environmental economics, law and economics, healthcare econom- ics and taxation. His intellectual curiosity led him to question prevailing ideas and to put forward new solutions. He found traditional welfare theory too limited to provide an understanding of the political process. Instead, he advocated a public choice perspective, which in his view would provide a more realistic interpretation of the goals of politicians and bureaucrats than that offered by traditional wel- fare economics. Ståhl also introduced the work of Ronald Coase on contracts and property rights in Sweden by applying it on various policy issues in public debate and by promoting it in his teaching. In his view, the study of economics should start from the study of contracts and property rights. Ståhl was appointed professor at Lund University at the young age of 33, in 1971. Over more than thirty years, he left his mark in many fields, retiring in 2004. He worked to introduce health eco- nomics, environmental economics, human capital, public choice, the economics of contracts and property rights, financial economics and law and economics in the curriculum. He embodied a sense of open academic enquiry.
Recommended publications
  • Regional Integration and the Location of Knowledge Intensive Multinational Firms
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Braunerhjelm, Pontus Working Paper Regional Integration and the Location of Knowledge-Intensive Multinational Firms: Implications for Comparative Advantage and Welfare of Outsiders and Insiders IUI Working Paper, No. 404 Provided in Cooperation with: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm Suggested Citation: Braunerhjelm, Pontus (1993) : Regional Integration and the Location of Knowledge-Intensive Multinational Firms: Implications for Comparative Advantage and Welfare of Outsiders and Insiders, IUI Working Paper, No. 404, The Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IUI), Stockholm This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/94695 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung
    [Show full text]
  • Is a Strong Indigenous Industrial Base a Necessary Condition For
    Responding to the crisis: Are policies aimed at a strong indigenous industrial base a necessary condition for sustainable economic growth? Bernadette Andreosso-O’Callaghan and Helena Lenihan1 Abstract We examine whether a strong indigenous manufacturing base is a necessary condition for sustainable economic growth in the case of two small, open economies, Ireland and Sweden. Sweden has been impacted by the economic crisis to a lesser degree than Ireland; we explore (through a manufacturing activity lens) the reasons for the asymmetric impacts and ask if the nature of the shock is related to ‘Economic Sovereignty’ and to the type of industrial policy. We argue Sweden was less affected given that its indigenous firms control the highly export-focussed and technology- based engineering sector whereas in Ireland high-technology sectors are controlled by foreign firms. In terms of policy implications, we suggest that industrial policy should aim for sustainable economic activity and growth such that industrial activity within the economy should be able to minimise the impact of asymmetric shocks such as the current global economic recession. keywords: manufacturing base; economic vulnerability; shock; economic crisis; industrial policy. 1 Department of Economics, Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Ireland. Corresponding author. Email; [email protected] 1 Introduction High-profile Multinational Enterprise (MNE) job losses have featured regularly in the Irish news of late contributing significantly to Ireland’s unemployment rate (13.4 per cent in December 2010; CSO 2010). Such developments have put into question the sustainability of Ireland’s industrial policy which, we argue, has focused most of its efforts on FDI/MNEs to the detriment of an indigenous (largely SME) sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Swedish Approach Regarding COVID-19 Successful in the Term of Economics?
    Was Swedish approach regarding COVID-19 successful in the term of economics? 1 Abstract On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared that Covid-19 is a pandemic. At that time the total number of cases were 118,000 and virus was spread over 110 countries. After that a lot of European countries imposed draconian restrictions. Italy, Spain, France, the United Kingdom and other European countries believed that “Great Lockdown” and strict measures would help to prevent the spread of the virus, but unlike all these countries Sweden chose another way in response to Covid-19. Swedish authorities primarily relied on their citizens' responsibility and didn’t decide to close restaurants, schools, bars, shops and other places of peoples gathering, like the other European countries did. In this paper I can't prove or disprove was this approach successful because it is still an ongoing process and the paper is not about “how successful was Swedish strategy”, in this paper i want to examine the notion “was Swedish approach successful in terms of economics”. To do it, in the first part, I am going to discuss Swedish approach to COVID-19 and its health outcomes, in order to see the whole picture we have to analyse what really this approach means and how it has been different from other European countries approaches. Health outcomes are also very interesting factor, because a lot of scholars believe that Sweden approach failed because country has seen high mortality rate and the cost of it was “saved economics”, but we have examples of countries with draconian restrictions and at the same time with the mortality rate much more higher than Sweden has and finally with help of data, diagram and comparison with other European countries I want to check if this model has been really effective regarding economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing the Efficiency of the Cooperation Between Business and Science – Moving Away from Silos Through a Mission-Orientated STI Policy
    Enhancing the efficiency of the cooperation between business and science – Moving away from silos through a mission-orientated STI policy Final Report Project funded under the call for tenders No SRSS/C2019/065 Dr Jelena Angelis Dr Lisa Cowey Dr Agnė Paliokaitė Elžbieta Jašinskaitė Alasdair Reid Kimmo Halme 17 December 2020 The project was funded by the European Union via the Structural Reform Support Programme and implemented i by EFIS Centre and Visionary Analytics in cooperation with the European Commission's Directorate General for Structural Reform Support. Table of content 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 2 Bottlenecks and drivers for business-science cooperation in Lithuania ................. 4 2.1 Strategic business-science collaboration context in Lithuania ...................................... 4 2.2 Health technologies and Biotechnologies (Life sciences) ............................................. 7 2.3 Information and Communication Technology ............................................................. 15 2.4 Engineering (focus on photonics and laser technologies) .......................................... 21 2.5 Agro-innovation and Food technologies ..................................................................... 27 2.6 Drivers and barriers for business-science collaboration in STI ................................... 33 3 Review of international experience from Ireland, Sweden and the Netherlands .. 37 3.1 Economic and innovative
    [Show full text]
  • The Swedish Innovation Strategy
    The Swedish Innovation Strategy Produced by: the Swedish Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Illustrations: Johan Hallnäs/Svenska Grafikbyrån Photos: Elliot Elliot/Johnér, cover, Morgan Karlsson/Johnér, page 4, Kari Kohvakka/Johnér, page 8, Plattform/Johnér, page 12, Mats Hallgren/Johnér, page 18, Lina Karna Kippel/Johnér, page 20, Susanne Kronholm/Johnér, page 50 Printed by: Åtta 45 Art. no.: N2012.33 Foreword Innovation begins with the human being. Human beings have ideas and develop know- ledge. Human beings use their knowledge, skills and experience in new solutions in their businesses, in their workplaces, in their spare time or as consumers. Sweden’s innovation capacity is essential to meet the challenges and opportunities of the global economy. Policy must therefore be based on a holistic view of how Sweden’s innova- tion capacity can be maintained and strengthened over time. This is the starting point for the Government’s national innovation strategy. The world today is undergoing fundamental changes. Many countries in the EU and the OECD, as well as emerging countries such as China, India, Russia and Brazil, have an increased focus on developing the innovation climate of their countries. Sweden stands relatively strong in most international comparisons of countries’ innovation capacities and competitiveness. However, global competition is increasing between companies and nations. The rising pressure on the earth’s resources also requires new solutions that combine ecological, social and economic sustainability. In Sweden, we need to be more innovative to meet the global societal challenges, to increase the competitiveness and to renew the future welfare and public services.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation of the Polish Economy in Comparison with the EU Member States
    www.ees.uni.opole.pl ISSN paper version 1642-2597 ISSN electronic version 2081-8319 Economic and Environmental Studies Vol. 18, No 2 (46/2018), 971-993, June 2018 Innovation of the Polish economy in comparison with the EU member states Magdalena WĘGLARZ Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland Abstract: In the paper, the change in the innovation level of the Polish economy over the years 2007-2016 will be presented and a comparison of the innovation level between the Polish economy and those of the EU member states over the years 2010-2016 will be made. The aim of the paper is to find the answer to the question what the reason of the relatively low innovation level of the Polish economy is in comparison with other countries. In 2016, the Polish economy took the fourth place from the last among all the EU member states, reaching the innovation level of less than 55% relative to that of the EU in 2010. In the first part, a measurement of innovation of the Polish economy will be presented. The measurement will use indicators that were described in three different reports of the Central Statistical Office. In the next part, the innovation level of all the EU member states will be described and the innovation level of the Polish economy will be compared with the innovation level of the EU member states’ economies, such as: Sweden (SE), the Czech republic (CZ), Slovenia (SI) Lithuania (LT) and the European Union. The analysis will be made on the basis of data from European Innovation Scoreboard 2017 (EIS).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Welfare State in Norway
    ساعت: امضاء صفحه آرا: ساعت: امضاء مسئول صفحه: ساعت: امضاء ادیتور:ADVERTISEMENTS ساعت: امضاء سردبیر: I N T E R N A T I O N A L D A I L Y APRILAPRIL 28, 2019 ANALYSISADVERTISEMENT & INTERVIEW 7 The role of welfare state in Norway sixth largest import partner and its total imports References By Hanif Ghaffari to Norway in 2015 amounted to $ 4.4 billion or 5.7 1)Carlgren, Fredrik. (28 September 2012). TEHRAN — Norway is located in Northern Europe percent of Norway’s total imports. South Korea “Snabba fakta om svensk export”, available at: and is one of the Nordic countries and a member of was seventh import partner for Norway in 2015, http: //www. ekonomifakta.se/Artiklar/2012/ NATO. The country has long borders with Sweden which accounted for 4.2% of Europe’s imports. September/Snabba-fakta-om-svensk-export/ and in other sides with Finland.30% of the work- After South Korea, the Netherlands is the eighth (Retrieved on 2015-01- 29) forces in Norway are working in the public sector, import partner and 3.6 percent of the country’s 2)Carlgren, Fredrik. (30 May 2016). “BNP per which rate is highest among the Organization for imports are made from Netherlands. capita”, Available at: http://www. ekonomifak- Economic Cooperation and Development (Statis- France and Poland are the ninth and tenth ta. se/Fakta/Ekonomi/Tillvaxt/BNP-per-capita/ tics Norway, 2014: 24). The Norwegian govern- import partners of Norway, accounting for 3.3 (Retrieved at: 27 July 2016). ment is large owners in key industries such as the and 3 percent of total imports in 2015 respective- 3)Ipsen, Erik.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Swedish Success 85
    The Political Economy of Swedish Success 85 the government will be responsive to the desires and demands of the citizens. At the same time, however, all governments' legitimacy is based on their efficacy. Can they get things done? These conflicting principles/ demands present rather difficult tensions in all democratic states. The more responsive the political elite is to the short-term preferences of the citizens, the less likely the government will be to make choices that are 4 in the interest of the whole of society and/or in the system's long-term self-interest. It is my contention that, for particular contingent historical Governing as an Engineering Problem: reasons, Sweden was able to find a balance between these competing goals of efficiency and efficacy. The Political Economy of Swedish Success In sum, if we step back from the particular choices and specific public Sven Steinmo policies pursued by Sweden and Swedish elites over the past decades, this country's success must be understood as a product of the fortuitous combination of the fact that (a) the institutional design has offered the elite enormous political and policy autonomy and (b) an elite political culture worked to build a largely egalitarian, efficient and universalist welfare state. Sweden is once again attracting the attention of scholars and pundits In the first part of this chapter, I will discuss several of Sweden's his­ from around the world because of its apparent ability to pull together toric policy initiatives, demonstrating that these institutional innovations high levels of economic growth and remarkably egalitarian outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Slash-And-Burn in the History of Swedish Forests
    Slash-and-Burn in the History of the Swedish Forests Henning Hamilton Introduction Today, the economy of Sweden is heavily dependent on forests. Trees provide 40% of all net export earnings, and Swedish companies are among the world leaders in industrial forestry. The welfare of the Swedish population has, to a very significant extent, been built on timber, wood pulp, and paper-based industries. Strict forest laws have helped foster the growth of high levels of production within the industry (moderated somewhat in recent years by the growth of the conservation lobby). The Swedish timber industry is now one of the most mechanised and industrialised in the world. In this situation it is easily forgotten that slash-and-burn agriculture was for many centuries a central feature of Swedish forest management. Slash-and-burn had an important place in the colonisation of the North and in the development of Nordic culture and economy. It was practised in areas of central and southern Sweden well into the 20th century. For a time, such facts were neglected even by economic historians. Today, however, interest and respect for this old practice – for centuries the key to survival in the wilderness, and the most economic use of a harsh and stony land – is increasing among the Swedish population. The Stone Age Economy Land use in Sweden has changed dramatically over the centuries. Ten thousand years ago, at the end of the Ice Age, a barren stony landscape of lakes and bogs was revealed by the receding ice. Forests began to reappear. First, slow growing birch and willows, later pines, aspen, alder and other broadleaves, and finally, spruce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Euro Crisis and Swedish GDP Growth – a Study of Spillovers by Pär Österholm and Pär Stockhammar
    Working Paper No. 134. March 2014 The Euro Crisis and Swedish GDP Growth – A Study of Spillovers By Pär Österholm and Pär Stockhammar National Institute of Economic Research, Kungsgatan 12-14, Box 3116, SE-103 62 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 453 59 00, Fax: +46 8 453 59 80, [email protected], www.konj.se ISSN 1100-7818 National Institute of Economic Research The Euro Crisis and Swedish GDP Growth – A Study of Spillovers Pär Österholm. and Pär Stockhammar March 2014 . National Institute of Economic Research, Box 3116, 103 62 Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] Phone: +46 8 453 59 48 National Institute of Economic Research, Box 3116, 103 62 Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] Phone: +46 8 453 5910 WORKING PAPER NO 134, MARCH 2014 PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH (NIER) NIER prepares analyses and forecasts of the Swedish and international economy and conducts related research. NIER is a government agency accountable to the Ministry of Finance and is financed largely by Swe- dish government funds. Like other government agencies, NIER has an independent status and is responsible for the assessments that it publish- es. The Working Paper series consists of publications of research reports and other detailed analyses. The reports may concern macroeconomic issues related to the forecasts of the institute, research in environmental economics, or problems of economic and statistical methods. Some of these reports are published in their final form in this series, whereas oth- ers are previews of articles that are subsequently published in interna- tional scholarly journals under the heading of Reprints.
    [Show full text]
  • Strenthening Opportunities of Economic Relations Between Lithuania and Sweden Within the Perspective of It Startup Company's D
    BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION ISSN 2029-7491 / eISSN 2029-6169 2017, 15(1): 57–76 doi:10.3846/bme.2017.357 STRENTHENING OPPORTUNITIES OF ECONOMIC RELATIONS BETWEEN LITHUANIA AND SWEDEN WITHIN THE PERSPECTIVE OF IT STARTUP COMPany’S DEVELOPMENT Živilė TUNČIKIENĖ1, Gabrielė SINKEVIČIŪTĖ2 1Department of Social Economics and Management, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, 10223, Vilnius, Lithuania 2Department of International Economics and Management, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, 10223, Vilnius, Lithuania E-mails: [email protected] (corresponding author); [email protected] Received 20 February 2017; accepted 11 April 2017 Abstract. Cooperation with Sweden – one of the key priorities of Lithuania. Eco- nomic cooperation potential is promising. One of the priority areas of economic activity, in which Sweden invests in Lithuania, is information and communica- tion. In order to develop and utilize the potential for economic cooperation in the IT field, it is relevant to structuralize IT startup business success factors and to jointly develop base for decisions, execution of which would help ensure effective, economic co-operation development based with Sweden, beginning of IT startup business and such business’s continuity. To achieve the objective, following tasks were resolved: concepts of startup business and the startup company were puri- fied, specifics inconcept’s application in the context of the parties were defined; systematized the startup business success factors and ways of strengthening them, focusing on the factors relevant for strengthening economic ties between Lithu- ania and Sweden within the perspective of IT startup company’s development.
    [Show full text]
  • MOSES: Model for Studying the Economy of Sweden.∗
    MOSES: Model for Studying the Economy of Sweden. Gunnar Bårdseny, Ard den Reijerz, Patrik Jonassonxand Ragnar Nymoen¶ January 2012 Abstract MOSES is an aggregate econometric model for Sweden, estimated on quarterly data, and intended for policy simulations and short-term forecasting. After a presen- tation of qualitative model properties, the econometric methodology is summarized. The model properties, within sample simulations, and forecast evaluations are pre- sented. We also address methodology and practical issues relating to building and maintaining a macro model of this type. The detailed econometric equations are reported in an appendix. “I think it should be generally agreed that a model that does not gen- erate many properties of actual data cannot be claimed to have any ‘policy implications’...” Clive.W. J. Granger (1992, p. 4). 1 Introduction MOSES is a small aggregate econometric model for Sweden. The model is actively used by the Swedish Riksbank, both for policy analysis and short-term forecasting. This paper first gives a presentation of qualitative model properties, with the aid of graphics and references to macroeconomic theory. The theory behind some key aspects of the model are then discussed in more detail, before the econometric methodology used in the specification of the model is summarized. A presentation of the model properties follows in the form of simulations. Forecasts from the model for the period 2010(1)-2013(4) are presented together with outcomes for 2010(1)-2010(3). Finally, a forecast comparison with two other models in use by the Riksbank is conducted. The results of the econometric modelling are reported in detail in an Appendix.
    [Show full text]