DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Q1 Cryptocurrency Report by Coingecko

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Q1 Cryptocurrency Report by Coingecko CoinGecko Table of Content TABLE OF MAJOR Global Overview 11 CONTENT Regulatory Headlines 12 EVENTS CRYPTO MARKET G20 Summit Results 13 10 PERSPECTIVES 21 MARKET Market Snapshot 4 ICOs & Viewpoints 22 DYNAMICS Price Growth 6 AIRDROPS Developer Activity 24 3 Market Breakdown 8 14 Overview 15 Top-50 Crypto 25 (Industries) Funding 16 Top ICOs 17 Google Search Trends 26 Coin’s All-Time-High 27 JOIn US t.me/coingeckoofficial Industries 18 t.me/coingeckonews Airdrops Guide 19 Founder’s Notes 28 Copyright © 2017 CoinGecko. All Rights Reserved. All figures, charts and graphs are based on data from www.coingecko.com unless otherwise stated. Important Notice: While we have made every attempt to ensure our data and information are gleaned from reliable sources and presented in the most accurate manner, CoinGecko takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. 2 All information in this report is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or for the results obtained from the use of this information. Nothing implied within this report should substitute the sound technical and business judgement of the reader. CoinGecko Market Dynamics TOP-30 CRYPTOCURRENCIES BY MARKET CAP Copyright © 2017 CoinGecko. All Rights Reserved. All figures, charts and graphs are based on data from www.coingecko.com unless otherwise stated. Important Notice: While we have made every attempt to ensure our data and information are gleaned from reliable sources and presented in the most accurate manner, CoinGecko takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this report is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or for the results obtained from the use of this information. Nothing implied within this report should substitute the sound technical and business judgement of the reader. CoinGecko Market Dynamics - Crypto Market Snapshot Year-on-Year Market Cap vs Transaction Volume ( Top-30 Cryptocurrencies ) 800B 80B 700B Dramatic drop in market cap 70B following a massive build-up 600B Total Volume Traded 60B Total Market Cap 500B Best Fit Line (Volume Traded) Trading Volume 50B stabilizes starting Mar Best Fit Line (Market Cap) 400B 2018 after a choppy 40B previous quarter 300B 30B Market Cap (USD) 200B 20B 100B 10B Trading Volume (USD) Trading Volume M M Apr 2017 May 2017 Jun 2017 Jul 2017 Aug 2017 Sep 2017 Oct 2017 Nov 2017 Dec 2017 Jan 2018 Feb 2018 Mar 2018 Note: Trading volume includes exchanges with and without fees. Okcoin, Huobi BTC China started charging fees from 24 January 2017 onwards. Copyright © 2017 CoinGecko. All Rights Reserved. All figures, charts and graphs are based on data from www.coingecko.com unless otherwise stated. Important Notice: While we have made every attempt to ensure our data and information are gleaned from reliable sources and presented in the most accurate manner, CoinGecko takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. 4 All information in this report is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or for the results obtained from the use of this information. Nothing implied within this report should substitute the sound technical and business judgement of the reader. CoinGecko Market Dynamics - Crypto Market Snapshot Q1 Market Cap vs Transaction Volume ( Top-30 Cryptocurrencies ) 70B 700B Declining USD$326 bil Total Volume Traded trading volume Decrease in Total Market Cap 60B throughout Q1 Market Cap* 600B Best Fit Line (Volme Traded) Best Fit Line (Market Cap) 50B Top-30 Cryptocurrencies by Market Cap 500B (as at 31/03/2018) 1 Bitcoin (BTC) 16 Ethereum Classic (ETC) 400B 40B 2 Ethereum (ETH) 17 Qtum (QTUM) 4 Ripple (XRP) 18 VeChain (VEN) 5 Bitcoin Cash (BCH) 19 Binance (BNB) 300B 30B 6 Litecoin (LTC) 20 ICON (ICX) 7 EOS (EOS) 21 OmiseGo (OMG) 8 Cardano (ADA) 22 Lisk (LSK) Market (USD) Cap 200B 20B 9 Stellar Lumens (XLM) 23 Bitcoin Gold (BTG) 10 NEO (NEO) 24 RaiBlocks (XRB) 11 IOTA (IOT) 25 Zcash (ZEC) 100B 10B 12 Monero (XMR) 26 Ontology (ONT) Tron (TRX) Bytom (BTM) Trading Trading Volume (USD) 13 27 14 Dash (DASH) 28 Verge (XVG) M M 15 Tether (USDT) 29 Bitcoin Private (BTCP) 16 NEM (XEM) 30 DigixDAO (DGD) Jan 2018 Feb 2018 Mar 2018 Note: Trading volume includes exchanges with and without fees. Okcoin, Huobi BTC China started charging fees from 24 January 2017 onwards. *refers to total market cap of Top-30 cryptocurrencies Copyright © 2017 CoinGecko. All Rights Reserved. All figures, charts and graphs are based on data from www.coingecko.com unless otherwise stated. Important Notice: While we have made every attempt to ensure our data and information are gleaned from reliable sources and presented in the most accurate manner, CoinGecko takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. 5 All information in this report is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or for the results obtained from the use of this information. Nothing implied within this report should substitute the sound technical and business judgement of the reader. CoinGecko Market Dynamics - Crypto Price Growth Price 2018 Q1 Returns # Coin Name Q1 Top-5 Cryptocurrencies Price Growth (%) (as of 31/3/2018) (as of 31/3/2018) 1 Bitcoin (BTC) $ 6,897.27 -51% 2 Ethereum (ETH) $ 395.33 -49% 3 Ripple (XRP) $ 0.51 -78% 80% Bitcoin Ripple 4 Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 701.96 -72% 5 Litecoin (LTC) $ 118.73 -48% -51% -78% 6 EOS (EOS) $ 6.07 -21% 60% 7 Cardano (ADA) $ 0.15 -80% Ethereum Bitcoin Cash 8 Stellar Lumens (XLM) $ 0.19 -62% -72% 9 NEO (NEO) $ 50.70 -39% 40% -49% 10 IOTA (IOT) $ 1.12 -73% 11 Monero (XMR) $ 173.21 -52% Litecoin 12 Tron (TRX) $ 0.04 -19% 20% -48% 13 Dash (DASH) $ 313.26 -71% 14 Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 -1% 15 NEM (XEM) $ 0.22 -79% 0% 16 Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 14.51 -52% 17 Qtum (QTUM) $ 14.41 -76% 18 VeChain (VEN) $ 2.36 -36% 19 Binance (BNB) $ 10.46 18% -20% 20 ICON (ICX) $ 2.29 -65% 21 OmiseGo (OMG) $ 8.29 -58% 22 Lisk (LSK) $ 7.50 -66% -40% 23 Bitcoin Gold (BTG) $ 44.65 -84% 24 Nano (NANO) $ 5.23 -82% 25 Zcash (ZEC) $ 190.58 -68% -60% 26 Ontology (ONT) $ 2.32 76% 27 Bytom (BTM) $ 0.55 41% 28 Verge (XVG) $ 0.04 -78% -80% 29 Bitcoin Private (BTCP) $ 24.13 -29% 30 DigixDAO (DGD) 51% Jan 18 Feb 18 Mar 18 $ 245.80 Copyright © 2017 CoinGecko. All Rights Reserved. All figures, charts and graphs are based on data from www.coingecko.com unless otherwise stated. Important Notice: While we have made every attempt to ensure our data and information are gleaned from reliable sources and presented in the most accurate manner, CoinGecko takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this report is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or for the results obtained from the use of this information. Nothing implied within this report should substitute the sound technical and business judgement of the reader. CoinGecko Market Dynamics - Crypto Price Growth Year-on-Year Top-5 Cryptocurrency Price Growth (%) Significant Volatility entering May YoY Returns YoY Returns 16000% # Coin Name YoY Returns # Coin Name # Coin Name and Dec (as of 31/3/2018) (as of 31/3/2018) (as of 31/3/2018) 1 Bitcoin (BTC) 536% 11 Monero (XMR) 719% 21 OmiseGo (OMG) 2046% 14000% 2 Ethereum (ETH) 684% 12 Tron (TRX) 1643% 22 Lisk (LSK) 2325% XRP’s price 3 Ripple (XRP) 2156% 13 Dash (DASH) 349% 23 Bitcoin Gold (BTG) -68% growth 12000% 4 Bitcoin Cash (BCH) -9% 14 Tether (USDT) 0% 24 Nano (NANO) 15921% dwarfs other 5 Litecoin (LTC) 1571% 15 NEM (XEM) 1133% 25 Zcash (ZEC) 195% 6 EOS (EOS) 270% 16 Ethereum Classic (ETC) 426% 26 Ontology (ONT) 76% coins 10000% 7 Cardano (ADA) 447% 17 Qtum (QTUM) 22% 27 Bytom (BTM) 314% 8 Stellar Lumens (XLM) 7113% 18 VeChain (VEN) 788% 28 Verge (XVG) 83269% 9 NEO (NEO) 24644% 19 Binance (BNB) 9654% 29 Bitcoin Private (BTCP) -29% 8000% 10 IOTA (IOT) 85% 20 ICON (ICX) 379% 30 DigixDAO (DGD) 1232% 6000% XRP ETH BTC LTC BCH 4000% 2156% 684% 536% 1571% -9% 2000% 0% Apr 17 May 17 Jun 17 Jul 17 Aug 17 Sep 17 Oct 17 Nov 17 Dec 17 Jan 18 Feb 18 Mar 18 Copyright © 2017 CoinGecko. All Rights Reserved. All figures, charts and graphs are based on data from www.coingecko.com unless otherwise stated. Important Notice: While we have made every attempt to ensure our data and information are gleaned from reliable sources and presented in the most accurate manner, CoinGecko takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. 7 All information in this report is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or for the results obtained from the use of this information. Nothing implied within this report should substitute the sound technical and business judgement of the reader. CoinGecko Market Dynamics - Crypto Market Breakdown Market Cap Value Market Cap Distribution # Coin Name Quarterly Market Cap Distribution (%) (as of 31/3/2018) (as of 31/3/2018) 1 Bitcoin (BTC) $ 116,900,853,303 49.26% Top-30 Cryptocurrencies 2 Ethereum (ETH) $ 38,946,452,754 16.41% 100% 3 Litecoin (LTC) $ 6,632,729,023 2.79% 4 Monero (XMR) $ 2,750,880,227 1.16% 5 Ripple (XRP) $ 19,923,193,222 8.39% 90% 6 Dash (DASH) $ 2,498,780,904 1.05% 7 NEO (NEO) $ 3,295,492,204 1.39% 80% 8 Lisk (LSK) $ 775,382,175 0.33%
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Realizing the Potential of Blockchain Technologies in Genomics
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Perspective Realizing the potential of blockchain technologies in genomics Halil Ibrahim Ozercan,1 Atalay Mert Ileri,2 Erman Ayday,1 and Can Alkan1 1Department of Computer Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey; 2Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA Genomics data introduce a substantial computational burden as well as data privacy and ownership issues. Data sets generated by high-throughput sequencing platforms require immense amounts of computational resources to align to reference ge- nomes and to call and annotate genomic variants. This problem is even more pronounced if reanalysis is needed for new ver- sions of reference genomes, which may impose high loads to existing computational infrastructures. Additionally, after the compute-intensive analyses are completed, the results are either kept in centralized repositories with access control, or dis- tributed among stakeholders using standard file transfer protocols. This imposes two main problems: (1) Centralized servers become gatekeepers of the data, essentially acting as an unnecessary mediator between the actual data owners and data users; and (2) servers may create single points of failure both in terms of service availability and data privacy. Therefore, there is a need for secure and decentralized platforms for data distribution with user-level data governance. A new technology, block- chain, may help ameliorate some of these problems. In broad terms, the blockchain technology enables decentralized, im- mutable, incorruptible public ledgers. In this Perspective, we aim to introduce current developments toward using blockchain to address several problems in omics, and to provide an outlook of possible future implications of the blockchain technology to life sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Review A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets Nikolaos A. Kyriazis Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, 38333 Volos, Greece; [email protected] Abstract: This study is an integrated survey of GARCH methodologies applications on 67 empirical papers that focus on cryptocurrencies. More sophisticated GARCH models are found to better explain the fluctuations in the volatility of cryptocurrencies. The main characteristics and the optimal approaches for modeling returns and volatility of cryptocurrencies are under scrutiny. Moreover, emphasis is placed on interconnectedness and hedging and/or diversifying abilities, measurement of profit-making and risk, efficiency and herding behavior. This leads to fruitful results and sheds light on a broad spectrum of aspects. In-depth analysis is provided of the speculative character of digital currencies and the possibility of improvement of the risk–return trade-off in investors’ portfolios. Overall, it is found that the inclusion of Bitcoin in portfolios with conventional assets could significantly improve the risk–return trade-off of investors’ decisions. Results on whether Bitcoin resembles gold are split. The same is true about whether Bitcoins volatility presents larger reactions to positive or negative shocks. Cryptocurrency markets are found not to be efficient. This study provides a roadmap for researchers and investors as well as authorities. Keywords: decentralized cryptocurrency; Bitcoin; survey; volatility modelling Citation: Kyriazis, Nikolaos A. 2021. A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets. Journal of Risk and 1. Introduction Financial Management 14: 293. The continuing evolution of cryptocurrency markets and exchanges during the last few https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm years has aroused sparkling interest amid academic researchers, monetary policymakers, 14070293 regulators, investors and the financial press.
    [Show full text]
  • Gridcoin Rewarding BOINC Computation
    Gridcoin Rewarding BOINC computation What is Gridcoin? ● Gridcoin is a Proof of Stake cryptocurrency – Proof of stake requires significantly less electricity than Proof of Work to secure the Gridcoin network. – Users ability to stake blocks is dependant on their Gridcoin balance, as opposed to wasteful hashing compute power. ● Rewards BOINC computation – Rewards are issued on top of POS block rewards. – Currently only team ‘Gridcoin’ is eligible for rewards. – Only ‘whitelisted’ BOINC projects are eligible for rewards. Gridcoin whitelisting process ● Project must meet min requirements – Sufficient & sustained workload for volunteers – Basic counter-collusion/anti-cheating mechanisms implemented. – Daily user.xml.gz files available to public – Ideally HTTPS enabled ● Reach out to Gridcoin community admins for additional info/help. ● Create a Gridcoin poll (we can make one for you) – The Gridcoin community votes using their coins and their level of BOINC computation (gridcoin magnitude). ● If the poll passes a Gridcoin community admin will whitelist the project swiftly & your volunteers will become eligible for Gridcoin rewards. ● If there’s insufficient workload or sustained downtime the project will be temporarily ‘grey listed’ during which time users are not eligible for new rewards. Gridcoin community in the last year Some BOINC stats Top 10 teams RAC Gridcoin Czech National Team Sicituradastra. BOINC@Taiwan SETI.Germany L'Alliance Francophone Crunching@EVGA The Planetary Society SETI.USA BOINC@AUSTRALIA What’s the future of Gridcoin? ● Gridcoin devs are actively working on re-basing Gridcoin to the latest Bitcoin code base. – Several years of improvements to benefit Gridcoin. ● Removal of the team requirement – All BOINC users will be eligible for rewards.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain Consensus Algorithms: a Survey
    1 Blockchain Consensus Algorithms: A Survey Md Sadek Ferdous, Member, IEEE, Mohammad Jabed Morshed Chowdhury, Mohammad A. Hoque, Member, IEEE, and Alan Colman F Abstract—In recent years, blockchain technology has received unpar- of Bitcoin [1] that was introduced in 2008. While crypto- alleled attention from academia, industry, and governments all around currencies have emerged as the principal and the most pop- the world. It is considered a technological breakthrough anticipated to ular application of blockchain technology, many enthusiasts disrupt several application domains touching all spheres of our lives. from different disciplines have identified and proposed a The sky-rocket anticipation of its potential has caused a wide-scale plethora of applications of blockchain in a multitude of exploration of its usage in different application domains. This has resul- ted in a plethora of blockchain systems for various purposes. However, application domains [2], [3]. The possibility of exploiting many of these blockchain systems suffer from serious shortcomings blockchain in so many areas has created huge anticipation related to their performance and security, which need to be addressed surrounding blockchain systems. Indeed, it is regarded as before any wide-scale adoption can be achieved. A crucial component one of the fundamental technologies to revolutionise the of any blockchain system is its underlying consensus algorithm, which landscapes of the identified application domains. in many ways, determines its performance and security. Therefore, to A blockchain system is, fundamentally, a distributed address the limitations of different blockchain systems, several existing system that relies on a consensus algorithm that ensures as well novel consensus algorithms have been introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Insights Into the Development of Cryptocurrencies
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hanl, Andreas Working Paper Some insights into the development of cryptocurrencies MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 04-2018 Provided in Cooperation with: Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, University of Marburg Suggested Citation: Hanl, Andreas (2018) : Some insights into the development of cryptocurrencies, MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 04-2018, Philipps- University Marburg, School of Business and Economics, Marburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/175855 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics by the Universities of Aachen ∙ Gießen ∙ Göttingen Kassel ∙ Marburg ∙ Siegen ISSN 1867-3678 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Currency and Central Banking
    Digital currency and central banking Tony Yates Talk to Oxford University, May 2017 Me • Prof at Birmingham University. • Research: applied time series; monetary policy; macro dynamics. • Twitter: @t0nyyates • Blog: longandvariable Overview • Emergence of digital currencies and associated technologies like Bitcoin / distributed ledger. • Poses challenges/ presents opportunities for: – Monetary policy – Financial stability policy • …And perhaps even questions the existence of central banks. • What are these challenges and how should/will central banks respond to them? • What consequences would a response or lack of it have? Reading • Blogs [here and here] by David Andolfatto, St Louis Fed, also his slide show. • Ben Broadbent, BoE’s DG, 2016 speech ‘Central banks and digital currencies’ • BoE QB: Ali et al ‘The economics of digital currencies’, 2014 • BoE QB: Ali et al ‘Innovations in payment technologies and the emergence of digital currencies’, 2014 • LRB, John Lanchester ‘When Bitcoin grows up, where is money?’, 2016 • Yates, 2017 ‘India’s reverse helicopter drop’, FT Alphaville More reading • Viri Lehndonvirta, OII, ‘The blockchain paradox…’ • ‘The plan to unite Bitcoin with other online currencies’, Stefan Thomas, Wired. • Various posts on FT Alphaville; also follow @izakaminska, @DavidKeo, @M_C_Klein • My Bristol MSc monetary econ reading list inc. module on the zero bound. Our perennial Utopian/Dystopian technology preoccupations Elements of the distracting digital currency mystique • Pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin: ‘Satoshi Yakamoto’ • False revelation by Australian computer programmer, Craig Stephen Wright, or was it? • Cryptography; distributed remote computing on the internet • Fraud in Bitcoin exchanges • Disputes in the Bitcoin communities Pitfalls of the Bitcoin commentaries • Poorly understood technology • Allows us to fantasise or worry about Utopian or Dystopian transformation, sometimes simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • A Banking Blight Crypto-Currency
    Crypto-Currency; A Banking Blight By Kenneth J. Berke, PayQwick, LLC’s Co-Founder and CEO, and Sahar Ayinehsazian, PayQwick, LLC’s Manager of Regulatory and Governmental Affairs. he marijuana industry is a rap- by solving mathematical equations. Unlike appeals to state licensed marijuana businesses. idly expanding sector that has traditional currency, which has no finite limit Because of marijuana’s current status as a Sched- proven profitable for licensed and can be minted and multiplied as necessary, ule I controlled substance, many banks will marijuana businesses and the fi- once the maximum number of a type of crypto- not serve marijuana businesses. Consequently, Tnancial institutions that serve them. These currency has been mined, no new amount of these businesses rely heavily on cash, which is profits are often manifested by piles of cash that crypto-currency can be created. both cumbersome and extremely dangerous. that are costly and dangerous to handle. To To find a cash alternative, some marijuana busi- solve this problem, some marijuana busi- If this seems complicated, it is. In March 2014, nesses have turned to debit/credit card process- nesses have turned to crypto-currency as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released ing (swipe) machines that use crypto-currency. an alternative. However, crypto-currency Notice 2014-21 to explain “how existing 10 only complicates the marijuana industry general tax principles apply to transactions What are the Dangers? by exposing both crypto-currency users using virtual currency.” In Notice 2014-21, While crypto-currency may seem like a viable and the banks that serve them to liabil- the IRS stated that while “in some environ- cash alternative, in reality, it allows marijuana li- ity for money laundering and tax evasion, ments, [crypto-currency] operates like ‘real’ censees to launder money from illegal drug sales thereby putting Washington’s entire legal currency… it does not have legal tender sta- and avoid paying taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lightweight Hash-Based Blockchain Architecture for Industrial Iot
    applied sciences Article A Lightweight Hash-Based Blockchain Architecture for Industrial IoT Byoungjin Seok , Jinseong Park and Jong Hyuk Park * Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, Korea; [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (J.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-02-970-6702 Received: 27 May 2019; Accepted: 4 September 2019; Published: 7 September 2019 Abstract: Blockchain is a technology that can ensure data integrity in a distributed network, and it is actively applied in various fields. Recently, blockchain is gaining attention due to combining with the Internet of Things (IoT) technology in the industrial field. Moreover, many researchers have proposed the Industrial IoT (IIoT) architecture with blockchain for data integrity and efficient management. The IIoT network consists of many heterogeneous devices (e.g., sensors, actuators, and programmable logic controllers (PLC)) with resources-constrained, and the availability of the network must be preferentially considered. Therefore, applying the existed blockchain technology is still challenging. There are some results about the technique of constructing blockchain lightly to solve this challenge. However, in these results, the analysis in perspective of cryptographic performance (area, throughput, and power consumption) has not been considered sufficiently, or only focused on the architecture of the blockchain network. The blockchain technology is based on cryptographic techniques, and the main part is a cryptographic hash function. Therefore, if we construct the blockchain-based IIoT architecture, we have to consider the performance of the hash function. Many lightweight hash functions have been proposed recently for the resource-constrained environment, and it can also be used to the blockchain.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting Blockchain Technology for Scientific Computing Wei Li [email protected] Abstract Blockchain Stores Information Into A
    Adapting Blockchain Technology for Scientific Computing Wei Li [email protected] Abstract Blockchain stores information into a chain of “blocks”, whose integrity is usually guaranteed by Proof of Work (PoW). In many blockchain applications (including cryptocurrencies), users compete with each other to win the ownership of the blocks, a process commonly referred as “mining”. Mining activities consume huge amount of power, while the outcome appears to be useless besides validating a block. Here we discuss the requirements of designing a new PoW algorithm. We also propose a PoW scheme to help solve high-dimension, non-linear optimization problems. Simulation experiments of blockchains generated by three miners solved an instance of Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), a well-known NP-hard problem. The revised scheme enables us to address difficult scientific questions as a byproduct of mining. Introduction Blockchain is a de-centralized, peer-to-peer network of a ledger system that is inherently resistant to modification. Blockchain stores information (e.g., transactions) into a data structure called “blocks”, that are inter-connected as chains or networks [1]. To prove the integrity of a block and to increase the difficulty of modification and attack, each block usually includes proof-of-work (PoW), whose generation requires some computational resources. PoW is widely used in cryptocurrencies including BitCoin [1] and Ethereum [2]. The increasing popularity of cryptocurrency stimulates users to use dedicated hardware and consume huge amount
    [Show full text]
  • Rule Technologies
    Jose Julio Alferes · Leopoldo Bertossi Guido Governatori · Paul Fodor Dumitru Roman (Eds.) Rule Technologies LNCS 9718 Research, Tools, and Applications 10th International Symposium, RuleML 2016 Stony Brook, NY, USA, July 6–9, 2016 Proceedings 123 Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9718 Commenced Publication in 1973 Founding and Former Series Editors: Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan van Leeuwen Editorial Board David Hutchison Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK Takeo Kanade Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Josef Kittler University of Surrey, Guildford, UK Jon M. Kleinberg Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Friedemann Mattern ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland John C. Mitchell Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Moni Naor Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel C. Pandu Rangan Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India Bernhard Steffen TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany Demetri Terzopoulos University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Doug Tygar University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA Gerhard Weikum Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken, Germany More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7408 Jose Julio Alferes • Leopoldo Bertossi Guido Governatori • Paul Fodor Dumitru Roman (Eds.) Rule Technologies Research, Tools, and Applications 10th International Symposium, RuleML 2016 Stony Brook, NY, USA, July 6–9, 2016 Proceedings 123 Editors Jose Julio Alferes Paul Fodor Universidade Nova de Lisboa Stony Brook University Lisboa Stony Brook, NY Portugal USA Leopoldo Bertossi Dumitru Roman Carleton University SINTEF/University of Oslo Ottawa, ON Oslo Canada Norway Guido Governatori NICTA Queensland Brisbane, QLD Australia ISSN 0302-9743 ISSN 1611-3349 (electronic) Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN 978-3-319-42018-9 ISBN 978-3-319-42019-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-42019-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016943419 LNCS Sublibrary: SL2 – Programming and Software Engineering © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Gridcoin BOINC User 2
    Breaking and Fixing Gridcoin Martin Grothe, Tobias Niemann, Juraj Somorovsky and Jörg Schwenk Source: http://gaincryptocurrency.altervista.org/alterpages/10710353_865938750143391_6543553170888387417_o.jpg Bitcoin Bitcoin Block chain - details Breaking and fixing Gridcoin 3 Martin Grothe, Tobias Niemann, Juraj Somorovsky Bitcoin Block chain - details Block header Breaking and fixing Gridcoin 3 Martin Grothe, Tobias Niemann, Juraj Somorovsky Bitcoin Block chain - details Block header Hash prev. block header Breaking and fixing Gridcoin 3 Martin Grothe, Tobias Niemann, Juraj Somorovsky Bitcoin Block chain - details Block header Hash prev. block header Block Transaction TransactionTransaction TransactionTransaction Transaction Y Public key Z PublicTransaction key YTransaction Public key Z Public key Y Public key Z Public key Y Public key Z Public key Hash Hash Hash Hash Hash Hash Hash Hash X Signature Y Signature X Signature Y Signature X Signature Y Signature X Signature Y Signature Breaking and fixing Gridcoin 3 Martin Grothe, Tobias Niemann, Juraj Somorovsky Bitcoin Block chain - details Block header Hash prev. block header Compressed transactions Block Transaction TransactionTransaction TransactionTransaction Transaction Y Public key Z PublicTransaction key YTransaction Public key Z Public key Y Public key Z Public key Y Public key Z Public key Hash Hash Hash Hash Hash Hash Hash Hash X Signature Y Signature X Signature Y Signature X Signature Y Signature X Signature Y Signature Breaking and fixing Gridcoin 3 Martin Grothe, Tobias Niemann,
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking and Fixing Gridcoin
    Breaking and Fixing Gridcoin Martin Grothe, Tobias Niemann, Juraj Somorovsky, Jörg Schwenk Horst Görtz Institute for IT Security, Ruhr University Bochum {firstname.lastname}@rub.de Abstract cryptocurrencies, so called altcoins. These altcoins at- Bitcoin has been hailed as a new payment mechanism, tempt to establish new user communities by advertising and is currently accepted by millions of users. One of different technology improvements or tweaks. Nowa- the major drawbacks of Bitcoin is the resource intensive days, about 700 Bitcoin based cryptocurrencies exist [4]. Proof-of-Work computation. Proof-of-Work is used to establish the blockchain, but this proof of work does not Wasteful computation. One of the main drawbacks of bring any benefits and arguably is a waste of energy. To Bitcoin (and other Bitcoin based cryptocurrencies) is the use these available resources in a more meaningful way, resource expensive Proof-of-Work computation. Proof- several alternative cryptocurrencies have been presented. of-Work is used to establish the blockchain, which con- One of them is Gridcoin, which rewards the users for tains blocks with Bitcoin transactions. In order to con- solving BOINC problems. Gridcoin currently possesses struct a new valid block, the so called miners collect Bit- a market capitalization of $ 23,423,115. coin transactions. They attempt to hash data from the In our work we conducted the first security analysis of previous block together the transactions and some ran- Gridcoin. We identified two critical security issues. The domness so that the resulting SHA-256 value lies below first issue allows an attacker to reveal all email addresses a specific boundary (i.e., the hash value starts with a spe- of the registered Gridcoin users.
    [Show full text]