DOCSLIB.ORG

Mixed Freight and Higher-Speed Passenger Trains: Framework for Superelevation Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mixed Freight and Higher-Speed Passenger Trains: Framework for Superelevation Design U.S. Department of Transportation Mixed Freight and Higher-Speed Passenger Trains: Federal Railroad Administration Framework for Superelevation Design Office of Research, Development and Technology Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-19/42 Final Report October 2019 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided in this report, please contact the COR listed in the Report Documentation Page. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED October 2019 Technical Report, September 2015 – May 2016 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Mixed Freight and Higher-Speed Passenger Trains: Framework for Superelevation Design 6. AUTHOR(S) DTFR53-15-C-00023 Tyler Dick, Conrad Ruppert 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign REPORT NUMBER 205 North Mathews Avenue, MC-250 1245A Newmark Civil Engineering Laboratory Urbana, IL 61801 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING U.S. Department of Transportation AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Policy and Development DOT/FRA/ORD-19/42 Office of Research, Development and Technology Washington, DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES COR: Cameron Stuart 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public through the FRA eLibrary. 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) As the demand for higher-speed passenger trains increases, the disparity between freight and passenger operations also increases. On mixed-use rail corridors, the result is a bi-modal distribution of train speeds that complicates design of curve superelevation. To aid in making informed curve superelevation decisions on mixed-use rail corridors, this report synthesizes industry knowledge and tools used to evaluate curve superelevation. This report develops the superelevation bandwidth concept into a framework to optimize superelevation on mixed-use corridors. The framework is presented as both a graphical approach and a mathematical model that can be applied to select superelevation design parameters for multiple curves on a rail corridor. Five case studies illustrating typical design situations encountered in the development of mixed-use corridors are highlighted. Each case study demonstrates how the selection of actual superelevation results in trade-offs between the operation of slower trains with overbalance and imposing curve speed restrictions on faster trains. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Superelevation, high-speed rail, freight operations, passenger operations 65 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Overall Approach ........................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Scope ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Organization of the Report .......................................................................................... 2 2. Physics of Superelevated Railway Curves .................................................................. 4 2.1 Basic Quasi-Static Curving Analysis .......................................................................... 4 2.2 Distribution of Lateral and Vertical Wheel Forces ..................................................... 6 2.3 Consideration of In-Train Forces on Ascending and Descending Grades .................. 8 2.4 Maintenance and Safety Considerations ................................................................... 15 3. Design Guidelines and Standards .............................................................................. 17 3.1 FRA Regulations and AREMA Recommended Practices ........................................ 17 3.2 Class I Freight Railway Standards ............................................................................ 18 3.3 Passenger and Commuter Standards ......................................................................... 21 3.4 Summary and Comparisons of U.S. Practice ............................................................ 25 3.5 International Practice ................................................................................................. 31 3.6 Other Practical Constraints ........................................................................................ 32 4. Selection of Superelevation for Multiple Train Speeds ............................................ 34 4.1 Difficulties in Handling Multiple Train Speeds ........................................................ 34 4.2 Running Time and Curve Speed Restrictions ........................................................... 35 4.3 Superelevation Bandwidth ........................................................................................ 36 4.4 Bandwidth and Distribution of Train Speeds: Graphical Approach ......................... 38 4.5 Superelevation Optimization Framework ................................................................. 38 5. Case Studies............................................................................................................... 42 5.1 Freight Corridor with Passenger Traffic ................................................................... 43 5.2 Freight Corridor with Advanced Passenger Trainset ................................................ 44 5.3 Freight Corridor with Higher-Speed Passenger Trains ............................................. 46 5.4 Higher-Speed Passenger Corridor with Local Freight Service ................................. 48 5.5 High-Speed Passenger Corridor with Local Freight Service .................................... 50 6. Summary.................................................................................................................... 53 6.1 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................ 53 6.2 Research Needs ......................................................................................................... 53 7. References ................................................................................................................. 55 Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................................... 58 i Illustrations Figure 1: Forces on rail vehicle at equilibrium condition produce resultant centripetal force ....... 5 Figure 2: Illustration of (a) forces acting on a rail vehicle while curving at different speeds and (b) vector force addition to produce required centripetal resultant for circular motion ......... 7 Figure 3: Variation in vertical and lateral wheel loads over a range of cant deficiency (a & c) and speed (b & d) for a 286,000 pound railcar on a 3-degree curve ............................................. 9 Figure 4: Influence in-train forces on required superelevation for (a) upgrade and (b) downgrade conditions at the same train speed ........................................................................................ 10 Figure 5: Variation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Prototype of Track Gauge and Cant Measurement Device for Curved Railroad by Using Microcontroller
    Advances in Engineering Research, volume 193 2nd International Symposium on Transportation Studies in Developing Countries (ISTSDC 2019) A Prototype of Track Gauge and Cant Measurement Device for Curved Railroad by Using Microcontroller Rony Alvin Alfatah Wahyu Tamtomo Adi Line Building Engineering and Railways Line Building Engineering and Railways Indonesia Railway Polytechnique Indonesia Railway Polytechnique Madiun, Indonesia Madiun, Indonesia [email protected] [email protected] Dwi Samsu Al Musyafa Septiana Widi Astuti Line Building Engineering and Railways Line Building Engineering and Railways Indonesia Railway Polytechnique Indonesia Railway Polytechnique Madiun, Indonesia Madiun, Indonesia [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—The purpose of this study is to create a tool for (track gauge) and the difference in elevation between the measuring track gauge and cant in the curved railroad with outer rail and the inner rail which is called can’t on the digital systems which can improve railroad maintenance with railroad curvature using a vernier caliper sensor and an automatic recording system for more efficient and easy to gyroscope to get the parameters of the track gauge, cant of use. This tool uses Arduino IDE as an application the arch, and the temperature of the measuring instrument. programming language and microcontroller board combined with several sensors to measure many parameters of track The data can be processed and monitored directly through an gauge and cant. Android devices with a Wi-Fi connection can android device using node MCU as a liaison of an android display the measurement results display real-time data on the device with a measuring instrument via wifi connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Sept 2015 - August 2016 Annual Report 2015-2016
    Annual Report Sept 2015 - August 2016 Annual Report 2015-2016 Rail Transportation Program Vision: “Develop leaders and technologies for 21st century rail transportation.” Mission: “To participate in the development of rail transportation and related engineering skills for the 21st century through an interdisciplinary and collaborative program that aligns Michigan Tech faculty and students with the demands of the industry.” 2 Director’s Message One of the easiest tasks for the Michigan Tech’s Rail Transportation Program Director is writing the message for the annual report. We never seem to be short of stories and while much of our work is about consistency from year to year, each one of them also contains highlights that are special for the year in question, and 2015-2016 was no exception. Perhaps the greatest achievement for the year was the approval of our Rail Transportation minor to the university curriculum. The minor follows our RTP vision by being multidisciplinary and flexible and we’re hoping that our first graduate with the minor will be during next academic year. The second special moment of the year took place in mid-August when we hosted the 4th Annual Michigan Rail Conference for the first time in the Upper Peninsula. The conference (held in Marquette with field visits to Escanaba) had a record participation and sponsorship levels and our field trips turned out as an experience beyond belief. For two days, it was great to be a “Yooper railroader”. From the projects/research perspective, we were pleased to have our first two projects with the greatest industry supporter of our program, CN Railway.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH WEST Freight Transport Strategy
    NORTH WEST Freight Transport Strategy Department of Infrastructure NORTH WEST FREIGHT TRANSPORT STRATEGY Final Report May 2002 This report has been prepared by the Department of Infrastructure, VicRoads, Mildura Rural City Council, Swan Hill Rural City Council and the North West Municipalities Association to guide planning and development of the freight transport network in the north-west of Victoria. The State Government acknowledges the participation and support of the Councils of the north-west in preparing the strategy and the many stakeholders and individuals who contributed comments and ideas. Department of Infrastructure Strategic Planning Division Level 23, 80 Collins St Melbourne VIC 3000 www.doi.vic.gov.au Final Report North West Freight Transport Strategy Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i 1. Strategy Outline. ...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Strategy Outcomes.................................................................................................................1 1.3 Planning Horizon.....................................................................................................................1 1.4 Other Investigations ................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Sopkin to Lead '49 Drive; UJA Caravan Train Here
    ----- ·empl e Bt: th- EL. Broad & Gl cnh~m St$. Only An51lo-Jewi1h Serving 30,000 Newspaper in This State in Rhode Island VOL. XXXIV, NO. 5 FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 1949 PROVIDENCE. R. I . TWENTY-FOUR PAGES 7 CENTS THE COPY Sopkin to Lead '49 Drive; UJA Caravan Train Here Li'I Abner Creator, Miss America Here Sun. Speakers ·Stress Capacity Crowd Need of U. S. Aid Attends Rally The a ppointment of Alvin A. j know that you will not refuse. Sopkin as chairman of the 1949 ; ' "We have it within our power fund-ra ising campa ign of the I to make "Homecoming-1949" the General J ewish Committee of realization of our dreams and Providence was announced Tues­ hopes of the past decade." day during the visit of the "Cara- I Economy In Danger van of Hope" train to this city. The need of United States aid This will m ark the fifth straight i to Israel and the DP's was the year that Sopkin has headed the keynote of the addresses delivered GJC's annual drive, which will by the speakers at Tuesday even­ start on Labor Day. ing's rally. Max Lerner, noted In his acceptance address, made columnist , author and lecturer, Tuesd ay evening at the Rhode told the packed throng that the Island School of Design auditor­ DP camps of Europe must be ium, where the "Caravan of Hope" e m p t i e d this year. Terming program was held before a capa­ Europe a cemetery, Lerner asserted city audience, Sopkin urged all , that if we fail to get the DP's contributors to the 1948 campaign f out of the camps, "their blood to pay their pledges at once, in I ALVIN A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signal Bridge
    THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Volume 18 NEWSLETTER OF THE MOUNTAIN EMPIRE MODEL RAILROADERS CLUB Number 5B MAY 2011 BONUS PAGES Published for the Education and Information of Its Membership NORFOLK & WESTERN/SOUTHERN RAILWAY DEPOT BRISTOL TENNESSEE/VIRGINIA CLUB OFFICERS LOCATION HOURS President: Secretary: Newsletter Editor: ETSU Campus, Business Meetings are held the Fred Alsop Donald Ramey Ted Bleck-Doran: George L. Carter 3rd Tuesday of each month. Railroad Museum Meetings start at 7:00 PM at Vice-President: Treasurer: Webmaster: ETSU Campus, Johnson City, TN. John Carter Duane Swank John Edwards Brown Hall Science Bldg, Room 312, Open House for viewing every Saturday from 10:00 am until 3:00 pm. Work Nights each Thursday from 5:00 pm until ?? APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Page 2 APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE Page 3 APRIL 2011 THE SIGNAL BRIDGE II scheme. The "stripe" style paint schemes would be used on AMTRAK PAINT SCHEMES Amtrak for many more years. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Phase II Amtrak paint schemes or "Phases" (referred to by Amtrak), are a series of livery applied to the outside of their rolling stock in the United States. The livery phases appeared as different designs, with a majority using a red, white, and blue (the colors of the American flag) format, except for promotional trains, state partnership routes, and the Acela "splotches" phase. The first Amtrak Phases started to emerge around 1972, shortly after Amtrak's formation. Phase paint schemes Phase I F40PH in Phase II Livery Phase II was one of the first paint schemes of Amtrak to use entirely the "stripe" style.
    [Show full text]
  • Track Inspection – 2009
    Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Track Maintenance Planning / Cost Evaluation for the Santa Cruz Branch Watsonville Junction, CA to Davenport, CA Prepared for Egan Consulting Group December 2009 HDR Engineering 500 108th Avenue NE, Suite 1200 Bellevue, WA 98004 CONFIDENTIAL Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Section 1.0 Introduction 10 Section 1.1 Description of Types of Maintenance 10 Section 1.2 Maintenance Criteria and Classes of Track 11 Section 2.0 Components of Railroad Track 12 Section 2.1 Rail and Rail Fittings 13 Section 2.1.1 Types of Rail 13 Section 2.1.2 Rail Condition 14 Section 2.1.3 Rail Joint Condition 17 Section 2.1.4 Recommendations for Rail and 17 Joint Maintenance Section 2.2 Ties 20 Section 2.2.1 Tie Condition 21 Section 2.2.2 Recommendations for Tie Maintenance 23 Section 2.3 Ballast, Subballst, Subgrade, and Drainage 24 Section 2.3.1 Description of Railroad Ballast, Subballst, 24 Subgrade, and Drainage Section 2.3.2 Ballast, Subgrade, and Drainage Conditions 26 and Recommendations Section 2.4 Effects of Rail Car Weight 29 Section 3.0 Track Geometry 31 Section 3.1 Description of Track Geometry 31 Section 3.2 Track Geometry at the “Micro-Level” 31 Section 3.3 Track Geometry at the “Macro-Level” 32 Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Page 2 of 76 Santa Cruz Branch Maintenance Study CONFIDENTIAL Section 3.4 Equipment and Operating Recommendations 33 Following from Track Geometry Section 4.0 Specific Conditions Along the 34 Santa Cruz Branch Section 5.0 Summary of Grade Crossing
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Engineering and Operations
    Annotation Railway Systems MSc Programme Railway Engineering and Operations Shaping the future of Introduction New Master Annotation Railways are complex systems. Infrastructure, The annotation Railway Systems has been railways worldwide rolling stock, operations and policy all need to developed to provide the industry with be integrated. The rail network is one of the scientifically trained engineers. Knowledge of Diploma Master of Science fastest and most reliable ways of transportation the entire railway system is vital to deal with and used more than any other way of public the challenges of today and tomorrow. Due Annotation Certificate transport worldwide. Keeping the system up to retirements, the railway sector is losing Railway Systems and running, brings many challenges each its skilled professionals rapidly. Therefore, Credits 120 ECTS, 24 months day. Anticipating on the changing demands a significant demand exists for well-trained asks for continuous innovation, co-operation engineers that can create, test and validate Starts in September and a long-term vision. our future railway networks. International 35% students Our rail network facilitates passenger and Delft University of Technology is well known Language of freight transportation, within cities and on for its wide range of railway education and English instruction both national and international scale. To stay research. This new rail annotation provides competitive to other ways of transportation, an opportunity for students of various it must be fast, safe, reliable, comfortable Master’s profiles to add a fundamental set of Faculties involved and cost effective. Railway engineers can railway courses to their curriculum. From a • Civil Engineering and Geosciences only address this permanent challenge when systems approach, integrating operations and • Technology, Policy and Management they are equipped with integral knowledge, engineering, you will be prepared to become • Mechanical, Maritime, Materials Engineering covering all involved disciplines and aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtd Light Rail Design Criteria
    RTD LIGHT RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA Regional Transportation District November 2005 Prepared by the Engineering Division of the Regional Transportation District Regional Transportation District 1600 Blake Street Denver, Colorado 80202-1399 303.628.9000 RTD-Denver.com November 28, 2005 The RTD Light Rail Design Criteria Manual has been developed as a set of general guidelines as well as providing specific criteria to be employed in the preparation and implementation of the planning, design and construction of new light rail corridors and the extension of existing corridors. This 2005 issue of the RTD Light Rail Design Criteria Manual was developed to remain in compliance with accepted practices with regard to safety and compatibility with RTD's existing system and the intended future systems that will be constructed by RTD. The manual reflects the most current accepted practices and applicable codes in use by the industry. The intent of this manual is to establish general criteria to be used in the planning and design process. However, deviations from these accepted criteria may be required in specific instances. Any such deviations from these accepted criteria must be approved by the RTD's Executive Safety & Security Committee. Coordination with local agencies and jurisdictions is still required for the determination and approval for fire protection, life safety, and security measures that will be implemented as part of the planning and design of the light rail system. Conflicting information or directives between the criteria set forth in this manual shall be brought to the attention of RTD and will be addressed and resolved between RTD and the local agencies andlor jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Curves for Railways
    NOTES ON CURVES FOR RAILWAYS BY V B SOOD PROFESSOR BRIDGES INDIAN RAILWAYS INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PUNE- 411001 Notes on —Curves“ Dated 040809 1 COMMONLY USED TERMS IN THE BOOK BG Broad Gauge track, 1676 mm gauge MG Meter Gauge track, 1000 mm gauge NG Narrow Gauge track, 762 mm or 610 mm gauge G Dynamic Gauge or center to center of the running rails, 1750 mm for BG and 1080 mm for MG g Acceleration due to gravity, 9.81 m/sec2 KMPH Speed in Kilometers Per Hour m/sec Speed in metres per second m/sec2 Acceleration in metre per second square m Length or distance in metres cm Length or distance in centimetres mm Length or distance in millimetres D Degree of curve R Radius of curve Ca Actual Cant or superelevation provided Cd Cant Deficiency Cex Cant Excess Camax Maximum actual Cant or superelevation permissible Cdmax Maximum Cant Deficiency permissible Cexmax Maximum Cant Excess permissible Veq Equilibrium Speed Vg Booked speed of goods trains Vmax Maximum speed permissible on the curve BG SOD Indian Railways Schedule of Dimensions 1676 mm Gauge, Revised 2004 IR Indian Railways IRPWM Indian Railways Permanent Way Manual second reprint 2004 IRTMM Indian railways Track Machines Manual , March 2000 LWR Manual Manual of Instructions on Long Welded Rails, 1996 Notes on —Curves“ Dated 040809 2 PWI Permanent Way Inspector, Refers to Senior Section Engineer, Section Engineer or Junior Engineer looking after the Permanent Way or Track on Indian railways. The term may also include the Permanent Way Supervisor/ Gang Mate etc who might look after the maintenance work in the track.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Track Maintenance Guide Winter Safety
    Customer Track Maintenance Guide Winter Safety Safety is of the utmost importance at CN, not only for our employees but Our goal is to move your products as quickly and safely as possible. also for you, our customers. Please contact your service delivery representative or account manager if you have any questions. We’ve developed this Customer Track Maintenance Guide in order to help bring attention to the additional hazards that are present during the winter Additional information on our seasonal safety guidelines can be found at: months, especially for our crews performing switching activities. www.cn.ca/seasonalsafety Winter is a challenging time for a railroad; many of the service disruptions are caused by accumulations of snow and ice. On the track, problems with switches and crossings are mainly caused by snow — so clearing the snow solves the problem. 3 Flangeways wheel flange Be particularly vigilant where flangeways can be become contaminated with snow, ice, or other material, or where any trackage is covered by excessive amounts of snow or ice, or other material. Ensure equipment can be carefully operated through flangeway over such track. flangeway Be especially aware at crossings, as these are prone to these types minimum of 1.5” clear rail of conditions. of ice, snow, mud, etc. At a minimum, flangeways must be cleared to a depth of 1.5”. Acceptable: Not acceptable: 4 Switches Be aware that switches can become very difficult to line due to cold weather and snow/ice build-up in the switch points. Attempting to line a stiff switch can and does lead to back, leg and arm injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation: Request for Passenger Rail Bonding -- Agenda Item II
    Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 • Madison, WI 53703 • (608) 266-3847 • Fax: (608) 267-6873 Email: [email protected] • Website: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb October 31, 2019 TO: Members Joint Committee on Finance FROM: Bob Lang, Director SUBJECT: Department of Transportation: Request for Passenger Rail Bonding -- Agenda Item II REQUEST On October 3, 2019, the Department of Transportation (DOT) submitted a request under s. 85.061 (3)(b) of the statutes for approval to use $13,248,100 BR in GPR-supported, general obligation bonding from DOT's passenger rail route development appropriation to fund the required state match for a recently awarded Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) grant for the purchase of six single-level coach cars and three cab-coach cars to be placed into service in the Milwaukee- Chicago Hiawatha corridor. BACKGROUND DOT is required to administer a rail passenger route development program funded from a transportation fund continuing appropriation (SEG) and a general fund-supported, general obligation bonding appropriation (BR). From these sources, DOT may fund capital costs related to Amtrak service extension routes (the Hiawatha service, for example) or other rail service routes between the cities of Milwaukee and Madison, Milwaukee and Green Bay, Milwaukee and Chicago, Madison and Eau Claire, and Madison and La Crosse. Under the program, DOT is not allowed to use any bond proceeds unless the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) approves the use of the proceeds and, with respect to any allowed passenger route development project, the Department submits evidence to JFC that Amtrak, or the applicable railroad, has agreed to provide rail passenger service on that route.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Vehicle Performance at High Speed and High Cant Deficiency
    Proceedings of the ASME/ASCE/IEEE 2011 Joint Rail Conference JRC2011 March 16-18, 2011, Pueblo, Colorado, USA JRC2011-56066 EXAMINATION OF VEHICLE PERFORMANCE AT HIGH SPEED AND HIGH CANT DEFICIENCY Brian Marquis Jon LeBlanc U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Volpe Innovative Technology Administration, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States Ali Tajaddini U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Rail Road Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington D.C., United States ABSTRACT The research for this paper was part of work done for the FRA In the US, increasing passenger speeds to improve trip time to support the FRA Railroad Safety Advisory Committee usually involves increasing speeds through curves. Increasing (RSAC) Track Working Group’s Vehicle Track Interaction speeds through curves will increase the lateral force exerted on (VTI) Task Force. The mission of the VTI task force was to track during curving, thus requiring more intensive track update Parts 213 and 238 of the Code of Federal Regulations maintenance to maintain safety. These issues and other (CFR) regarding rules for high speed (above 90mph) and high performance requirements including ride quality and vehicle cant deficiency (about 5 inches) operations. The task force stability, can be addressed through careful truck design. focused on a number of issues including refinement of VTI Existing high-speed rail equipment, and in particular their safety criteria, track geometry standards, vehicle qualification bogies, are better suited to track conditions in Europe or Japan, procedures and requirements and track inspection in which premium tracks with little curvature are dedicated for requirements, all with a focus on treating the vehicle and track high-speed service.
    [Show full text]