Výroční Zpráva Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Výroční Zpráva Annual Report Zoo Ostrava Zoo Ostrava VÝROČNÍ ZPRÁVA ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2016 VÝROČNÍ ZPRÁVA 2016 l ANNUAL REPORT VÝROČNÍ ZPRÁVA Zoologická zahrada Ostrava / Zoological Garden Ostrava Sídlo: Zoo Ostrava, Michálkovická 197, 710 00 Address: Zoo Ostrava, Michálkovická 197, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic Právní forma: příspěvková organizace, IČO: 00373249, DIČ: CZ00373249 tel.: +420 596 241 269, fax: + 420 596 243 316 Internet: www.zoo-ostrava.cz, e-mail: [email protected] Zřizovatel zoo / Founder: statutární město Ostrava/Statutory City of Ostrava Sídlo/Headquarters: Prokešovo nám. 8, 729 30 Ostrava Právní forma: územně správní celek, IČO: 00845451 Primátor / Lord Mayor: Ing. Tomáš Macura, tel: +420 599 443 131, fax: +420 596 118 861, [email protected] Ředitel zoo / Executive Director: Ing. Petr Čolas, tel. + fax: +420 596 243 316, [email protected] Sekretariát ředitele / Director’s Office: Mgr. Adéla Jonáková, [email protected] 1. zástupce ředitele a vedoucí dendrologického oddělení / Vice Director and Head of Horticulture: VÝROČNÍ ZPRÁVA Ing. Tomáš Hanzelka, [email protected] 2. zástupce ředitele a vedoucí zoologického oddělení / Head of Zoological Department: Mgr. Jiří Novák, [email protected] Zoologové a inspektoři chovu / Curators: ANNUAL REPORT Mgr. Adéla Obračajová, [email protected] Mgr. Jana Pluháčková, [email protected] Bc. Yveta Svobodová, [email protected] Ing. Ivo Firla, [email protected] Asistent zoologa, registrátor / Animal Registrar: Mgr. Jana Michálková, [email protected] Krmivář / Animal Feeding & Nutrition: Lenka Lindovská, [email protected] Vedoucí ekonomického oddělení/Head of Finance Ing. Pavlína Konečná, [email protected] Vedoucí technického oddělení / Head of Operations & Maintenance Ing. Tomáš Dvořák, [email protected] Vedoucí oddělení pro kontakt s veřejností / Head of Public Relations Ing. Enrico Gombala, [email protected] Tisková mluvčí / Spokeswoman: 2016 Mgr. Šárka Nováková, [email protected] Vzdělávání a osvěta / Conservation Education: Mgr. Dana Škorňáková, [email protected], Mgr. Adéla Jonáková, [email protected], Mgr. Barbara Krzyžanková, [email protected] Mgr. Vladimír Adámek, [email protected], Mgr. Jiří Šimon, [email protected] Grafika/Designer: Mgr. Zdeněk Berger, [email protected] Marketing/Marketing: Bc. Monika Ondrušová, [email protected] Vědecko-výzkumná činnost / Research: RNDr. Jan Pluháček PhD., [email protected], Ing. František Příbrský, [email protected] Zpracovatelé výroční zprávy / The 2016 Annual Report co-produced by: Petr Čolas, Jiří Novák, Šárka Nováková, Monika Ondrušová, Dana Škorňáková Grafická úprava/ Design by: Lukáš Pracný, OFTIS Ostrava Autoři fotografií / Photos by: Pavel Vlček, Světlana Kurbaškina, Klaus Rudloff, Jiří Novák, Jan Pluháček, Markéta Rejlková, Tomáš Hulík, Lukáš Kovár, L. Frgelecová a archiv Zoo Ostrava Neprošlo jazykovou korekturou. Obsah Content Úvodní slovo ředitele ................................................................................... 5 Turning the zoo’s in situ vision into reality ................................................. 53 Director’s opening words ............................................................................ 7 Výzkum v Zoologické zahradě Ostrava v roce 2016 ................................... 54 Chov zvířat v roce 2016 .............................................................................. 9 Research in Ostrava Zoo in 2016 .............................................................. 56 Animal collection update ........................................................................... 17 Budky v Zoo Ostrava ................................................................................. 59 Chov ary horského (Primolius couloni) v Zoo Ostrava ................................ 25 Bird boxes at Ostrava Zoo ......................................................................... 59 The review of keeping the blue -headed macaw Vzdělávání a osvěta .................................................................................. 60 (Primolius couloni) at Ostrava Zoo ............................................................. 25 Education and awareness raising .............................................................. 62 Další ostravský orlosup putoval do španělské Andalusie ............................ 26 Propagace zoo .......................................................................................... 64 One more bearded vulture travelled to Andalusia ...................................... 27 Promotion and publicity ............................................................................ 65 Návrat orla skalního (Aquila chrysaetos) do České republiky – 11 let projektu ......................................................... 29 Běh Zoo Ostrava pro Kukang ..................................................................... 66 The Returning the golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Running for Kukang at Ostrava Zoo ........................................................... 67 to the Czech Republic project: year 11 ...................................................... 30 Natáčení reportáží z prostředí Zoo Ostrava ................................................ 68 Damani pralesní (Dendrohyrax dorsalis) – duchové noční Afriky ................ 31 Making videos about Ostrava Zoo ............................................................. 69 Western tree hyraxes (Dendrohyrax dorsalis) – the ghosts of the African night ................................................................................... 32 Dendrologické oddělení v roce 2016 ......................................................... 71 Úhyn mláděte slona indického (Elephas maximus) .................................... 35 Dendrology in 2016 .................................................................................. 71 Death of a young Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) ................................. 35 Rostliny krásné i užitečné v Zoo Ostrava ................................................... 72 Umělé oplodnění u wapiti sibiřských ......................................................... 37 Plants in Ostrava Zoo: beautiful & useful ................................................... 73 Artifi cial insemination in Siberian wapitis .................................................. 39 Ekonomika, návštěvnost, údržba, investice a dárcovství v roce 2016 ......... 75 Ráj lemurů v Zoo Ostrava .......................................................................... 40 Financial operations in 2016 ..................................................................... 84 The Lemur Paradise at Ostrava Zoo .......................................................... 41 Seznam zaměstnanců Zoo Ostrava (k 31. 12. 2016) .................................. 85 Rekonstrukce a zprovoznění expozice Noční Tanganika ............................. 43 The list of employees of the Ostrava Zoo (as of December 31, 2016)......... 85 Night Tanganyika redesigned and put into service! .................................... 45 Stav zvířat 2016 ....................................................................................... 88 Výměna chovného samce u hulmanů posvátných Census of Animals 2016 ........................................................................... 88 (Semnopithecus entellus) v expozici Čitván ............................................... 48 A breeding male replaced in the group of entellus langur (Semnopithecus entellus), the Chitwan exhibit .......................................... 49 Nová chovná skupina šimpanzů hornoguinejských v Zoo Ostrava .............. 50 A new breeding group of Western chimpanzees at Ostrava Zoo ................. 51 Lev indický (Panthera leo persica) / Asian lion Proměna in situ vize Zoo Ostrava v realitu ................................................. 52 Úvodní slovo ředitele Petr Čolas Vážení příznivci Zoo Ostrava, vážení přátelé, vypuštění do volné přírody jsme bezplatně poskytli 17 sov pálených, po roce opět otvíráte Výroční zprávu ostravské zoologické zahrady, kde šest sýčků obecných a jednoho orlosupa bradatého. Kromě toho pod- Vám představíme nejdůležitější události roku 2016. A byl to rok nadmíru poruje Zoo Ostrava i několik záchranných programů, které probíhají úspěšný a na události bohatý. přímo v místě výskytu vybraných druhů ohrožených zvířat (tzv. in situ projekty). Podrobněji dále v kapitole pod názvem „Proměna in situ vize Kromě mnohého jiného jsme si připomněli již 65 let od založení naší Zoo Ostrava v realitu“. zoologické zahrady. V roce 2016 nás navštívilo celkem 509 336 lidí a podruhé v historii se podařilo překonat magickou hranici půl milionu V srpnu se v zoo ve spolupráci s atletickým klubem SSK Vítkovice návštěvníků. Potvrzuje se tak, že naše instituce je jedním z nejvýznam- uskutečnil historicky první charitativní běh, jehož výtěžek byl použit nějších turistických cílů nejen v rámci Moravskoslezského kraje, ale na fi nancování jednoho ze záchranných projektů – The Kukang Rescue i v celé České republice. Program. Hlavním cílem tohoto projektu je ochrana vyhubením ohrože- ného primáta – poloopice outloně váhavého na Sumatře. Klíčovým historickým mezníkem na poli ochrany přírody je projekt Koruna ze vstupu, který naši zoo zařadil mezi nejvýznamnější zoo České Z dalších akcí a aktivit bych jen v krátkosti zmínil uskutečnění jubilejního republiky i Evropy. Zastupitelstvo města Ostravy ho schválilo na sklonku 10. ročníku odborné konference pro pedagogické pracovníky,
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Speciose Family Characidae
    Oliveira et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:275 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/275 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Phylogenetic relationships within the speciose family Characidae (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Characiformes) based on multilocus analysis and extensive ingroup sampling Claudio Oliveira1*, Gleisy S Avelino1, Kelly T Abe1, Tatiane C Mariguela1, Ricardo C Benine1, Guillermo Ortí2, Richard P Vari3 and Ricardo M Corrêa e Castro4 Abstract Background: With nearly 1,100 species, the fish family Characidae represents more than half of the species of Characiformes, and is a key component of Neotropical freshwater ecosystems. The composition, phylogeny, and classification of Characidae is currently uncertain, despite significant efforts based on analysis of morphological and molecular data. No consensus about the monophyly of this group or its position within the order Characiformes has been reached, challenged by the fact that many key studies to date have non-overlapping taxonomic representation and focus only on subsets of this diversity. Results: In the present study we propose a new definition of the family Characidae and a hypothesis of relationships for the Characiformes based on phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences of two mitochondrial and three nuclear genes (4,680 base pairs). The sequences were obtained from 211 samples representing 166 genera distributed among all 18 recognized families in the order Characiformes, all 14 recognized subfamilies in the Characidae, plus 56 of the genera so far considered incertae sedis in the Characidae. The phylogeny obtained is robust, with most lineages significantly supported by posterior probabilities in Bayesian analysis, and high bootstrap values from maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist of CITES Listed Coral Species Part II
    CoP16 Doc. 43.1 (Rev. 1) Annex 5.2 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of CITES listed Coral Species Part II CORAL SPECIES AND SYNONYMS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED IN THE UNEP‐WCMC DATABASE 1. Scleractinia families Family Name Accepted Name Species Author Nomenclature Reference Synonyms ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrolhosensis Veron, 1985 Veron (2000) Madrepora crassa Milne Edwards & Haime, 1860; ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrotanoides (Lamarck, 1816) Veron (2000) Madrepora abrotanoides Lamarck, 1816; Acropora mangarevensis Vaughan, 1906 ACROPORIDAE Acropora aculeus (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora aculeus Dana, 1846 Madrepora acuminata Verrill, 1864; Madrepora diffusa ACROPORIDAE Acropora acuminata (Verrill, 1864) Veron (2000) Verrill, 1864; Acropora diffusa (Verrill, 1864); Madrepora nigra Brook, 1892 ACROPORIDAE Acropora akajimensis Veron, 1990 Veron (2000) Madrepora coronata Brook, 1892; Madrepora ACROPORIDAE Acropora anthocercis (Brook, 1893) Veron (2000) anthocercis Brook, 1893 ACROPORIDAE Acropora arabensis Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora aspera Dana, 1846; Acropora cribripora (Dana, 1846); Madrepora cribripora Dana, 1846; Acropora manni (Quelch, 1886); Madrepora manni ACROPORIDAE Acropora aspera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Quelch, 1886; Acropora hebes (Dana, 1846); Madrepora hebes Dana, 1846; Acropora yaeyamaensis Eguchi & Shirai, 1977 ACROPORIDAE Acropora austera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora austera Dana, 1846 ACROPORIDAE Acropora awi Wallace & Wolstenholme, 1998 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora azurea Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora batunai Wallace, 1997 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bifurcata Nemenzo, 1971 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora branchi Riegl, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora brueggemanni Brook, 1891; Isopora ACROPORIDAE Acropora brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) Veron (2000) brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bushyensis Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) Acropora fasciculare Latypov, 1992 ACROPORIDAE Acropora cardenae Wells, 1985 Veron (2000) CoP16 Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Divergence and Polyphyly in the Octocoral Genus Swiftia [Cnidaria: Octocorallia], Including a Species Impacted by the DWH Oil Spill
    diversity Article Genetic Divergence and Polyphyly in the Octocoral Genus Swiftia [Cnidaria: Octocorallia], Including a Species Impacted by the DWH Oil Spill Janessy Frometa 1,2,* , Peter J. Etnoyer 2, Andrea M. Quattrini 3, Santiago Herrera 4 and Thomas W. Greig 2 1 CSS Dynamac, Inc., 10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 300, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA 2 Hollings Marine Laboratory, NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Sciences, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 331 Fort Johnson Rd, Charleston, SC 29412, USA; [email protected] (P.J.E.); [email protected] (T.W.G.) 3 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th and Constitution Ave NW, Washington, DC 20560, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Dr, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Mesophotic coral ecosystems (MCEs) are recognized around the world as diverse and ecologically important habitats. In the northern Gulf of Mexico (GoMx), MCEs are rocky reefs with abundant black corals and octocorals, including the species Swiftia exserta. Surveys following the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill in 2010 revealed significant injury to these and other species, the restoration of which requires an in-depth understanding of the biology, ecology, and genetic diversity of each species. To support a larger population connectivity study of impacted octocorals in the Citation: Frometa, J.; Etnoyer, P.J.; GoMx, this study combined sequences of mtMutS and nuclear 28S rDNA to confirm the identity Quattrini, A.M.; Herrera, S.; Greig, Swiftia T.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Biota Colombiana Vol
    Biota Colombiana Vol. 9 (2), 2008 Una publicación del / A publication of: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt En asocio con / In collaboration with: Instituto de Ciencias Naturales de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - Invemar BIOTA COLOMBIANA Missouri Botanical Garden ISSN 0124-5376 Volumen 9 - Número 2, diciembre de 2008 Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia • Listado de especies espinosas de Solanum L. (Leptostemonum, Solanaceae) • Anfibios y reptiles en el departamento del Valle del Cauca, Colombia • Peces del Oriente de Antioquia, Colombia • Una nueva especie de Liotyphlops Peters, 1881 (Serpentes, Scolecophidia, Anomalepidae) del sur de la Amazonia Colombiana • Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia • Listado de LISTADOS TAXONÓMICOS / TAXONOMIC LIST especies espinosas de Solanum L. (Leptostemonum, Solanaceae) • Anfibios y reptiles en el departamento del Valle del Cauca, Colombia • Peces del Oriente de Antioquia, Colombia • Una nueva especie de Liotyphlops Peters, 1881 (Serpentes, Scolecophidia, Anomalepidae) del sur de la Amazonia Listados Nacionales / National Lists Colombiana • Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia • Listado de especies espinosas de Solanum L. (Leptostemonum, Solanaceae) • Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia – J. A. Maldonado-Ocampo, R. P. Vari & J. S. Usma......................143 Anfibios y reptiles en el departamento del Valle del Cauca, Colombia • Peces del Oriente de Antioquia, Colombia • Una nueva especie deLiotyphlops Peters, 1881 (Serpentes, Scolecophidia, Anomalepidae) del sur de la Amazonia Colombiana • Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia • Listado de especies espinosas de Solanum L. (Leptostemonum, Solanaceae) – C. I. Orozco, Listado de especies espinosas de Solanum L. (Leptostemonum, Solanaceae) • Anfibios y reptiles en el departamento del Valle del Cauca, Colombia G.
    [Show full text]
  • Cnidarian Immunity and the Repertoire of Defense Mechanisms in Anthozoans
    biology Review Cnidarian Immunity and the Repertoire of Defense Mechanisms in Anthozoans Maria Giovanna Parisi 1,* , Daniela Parrinello 1, Loredana Stabili 2 and Matteo Cammarata 1,* 1 Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.G.P.); [email protected] (M.C.) Received: 10 August 2020; Accepted: 4 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: Anthozoa is the most specious class of the phylum Cnidaria that is phylogenetically basal within the Metazoa. It is an interesting group for studying the evolution of mutualisms and immunity, for despite their morphological simplicity, Anthozoans are unexpectedly immunologically complex, with large genomes and gene families similar to those of the Bilateria. Evidence indicates that the Anthozoan innate immune system is not only involved in the disruption of harmful microorganisms, but is also crucial in structuring tissue-associated microbial communities that are essential components of the cnidarian holobiont and useful to the animal’s health for several functions including metabolism, immune defense, development, and behavior. Here, we report on the current state of the art of Anthozoan immunity. Like other invertebrates, Anthozoans possess immune mechanisms based on self/non-self-recognition. Although lacking adaptive immunity, they use a diverse repertoire of immune receptor signaling pathways (PRRs) to recognize a broad array of conserved microorganism-associated molecular patterns (MAMP). The intracellular signaling cascades lead to gene transcription up to endpoints of release of molecules that kill the pathogens, defend the self by maintaining homeostasis, and modulate the wound repair process.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY. LIBRARY OF THE MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. GIFT OF ALEXANDER AGASSIZ. S.(, \'\o6' JU •5 1 / NMNTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NEW YORK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY CHARTERED IN lS95 OBJECTS OF THE SOCIETY A PUBLIC ZOOLOGICAL PARK THE PRESERVATION OF OUR NATIVE ANIMALS THE PROMOTION OF ZOOLOGY 1904 NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE SOCIETY. 11 WALL STREET JANUARY, 190 5 Copyright, 1905, nv THE NEW YORK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY (Cbc (Crow press, Beu> Roch Contentji* PAGE The Board of Managers 6 Officers of the Society 7 List of Members 9 Report of the Executive Commhiee 31 I>andscape and Forestry 41 Trees and Shruhs in the Zoolo(;ical Park ..... 44 Treasurer's Reports 47 Park Improvement Fund 47 General Fund 48 Animal Fund 49 Maintenance Fund 50 Balance Sheet of Ground Improvement Fund . 51 Balance Sheet of Aquarium Improvement Fund ... 54 Aquarium Fund 55 Report of the Director IV. T. Honiaday 57 A New White Bear \V. T. Honiaday 81 Aquarium Report Charles H. Toumserui 89 Notes on Ceriain Pinnipeds . Cliarhs H. Tinvnseiui 105 List of Fishes 117 List of Gifts to the New York Zoological Society . .123 Osteomalacia of Primates in Captivity Har/oiv Brooks atid I J'. Reid Blair 135 Observations on Poisonous Serpents Raymond L. Ditmars i-j-j A New Species of Rattlesnake , , Raymond L. Ditmars 197 An Unusual Variation of Crotalus Lucifer Raymond L. Ditmars 200 The Ostriches and Their Allies . C. IVilliam Bcebe 203 The Rocky Mountain Goat Madison Grant 231 Documents : By-Laws 262 Index 268 Wt of 3iUu)Strationj3. PAGE The Rockefeller Fountain Frontispiece.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonia+ and Pandora+
    Appendix A Harmonia+PL – procedure for negative impact risk assessment for invasive alien species and potentially invasive alien species in Poland QUESTIONNAIRE A0 | Context Questions from this module identify the assessor and the biological, geographical & social context of the assessment. a01. Name(s) of the assessor(s): first name and family name 1. Henryk Okarma 2. Izabela Wierzbowska – external expert 3. Karolina Mazurska acomm01. Comments: degree affiliation assessment date (1) prof. dr hab. Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy 28-01-2018 of Sciences in Cracow (2) dr Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian 06-02-2018 University, Cracow (3) mgr Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy 08-02-2018 of Sciences in Cracow a02. Name(s) of the species under assessment: Polish name: Maral (jeleń mandżurski) Latin name: Cervus elaphus sibiricus English name: Altai wapiti acomm02. Comments: Taxonomy of Cervus class is very complex and the experts cannot agree on its classification into species and subspecies. In recent years a view has been adopted, based on phylogenetic molecular studies, that maral belongs to the subspecies of wapiti Cervus canadensis, which has been lately recognized as the separate species (Lorenzini and Garofalo 2015 – P). According to the current state of knowledge, maral is the subspecies of (Cervus canadensis) and it should be called Cervus canedensis sibiricus in Latin, and not Cervus elaphus sibiricus. Significant changes in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and wapiti (Cervus canadensis) size and build were the base for defining them as two separate species (Brook et al. 2016 – P, Long 2003 – P, Wilson and Mittermeier 2011 – P).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guides Birding Tours: Philippines
    Field Guides Tour Report PHILIPPINES Feb 26, 2011 to Mar 20, 2011 Dave Stejskal & Mark Villa I really enjoyed getting back to the Philippines again this year with our group. We had some fantastic birding moments together on this rather demanding and sometimes challenging trip, even to the very end. Every time I come back to these islands, I worry about how much more habitat has been lost in the intervening time since my last visit. As usual, lots had been lost, but much good habitat still remains, albeit more difficult to access. Despite the habitat loss, we were able to find, and to see very, very well, an impressive number of Philippine endemic birds. Perhaps first and foremost of these was the Great Philippine Eagle on Mt. Kitanglad. We had a couple of good looks, though they were a little distant. Still, to see this critically endangered eagle at all is a marvelous achievement! Other highlights of this three-week tour are many, but I feel compelled to mention: --that gorgeous male Palawan Peacock-Pheasant at St. Paul's NP --our close flyby looks at Bukidnon Woodcock Azure-breasted Pitta...a beauty seen well at --a flock of seven Philippine Cockatoos near Sabang PICOP (Photo by guide Dave Stejskal) --those bizarre Scale-feathered and Red-crested malkohas --our outstanding Luzon Scops-Owl --the delightful Silvery Kingfisher and the scarce Blue-capped Kingfishers at PICOP on Mindanao --all of those huge Rufous Hornbills --our surprise trio of Wattled Broadbills at dusk --our skulky Russet Bush-Warbler --and those strange Apo Mynas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of Biological Resources in the Philippines
    : -.^,rhr:"-i-3'^^=£#?^-j^.r-^a^ Sj2 r:iw0,">::^^'^ \^^' Cfl|*ti-»;;^ THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES IN THE PHILIPPINES A RRF'OHT V^Y THK lUCN CONSKRVATION MONITORING CENT:-!E PfcparGd by Roger Cox for the lnLf5rnaLion?.l InsLituLo Cor Knvironment and Development (IIED) February 1988 / fgrMsa^jnt-^'-agyga-- •r-r- ;.«-'> t ^-' isr* 1*.- i^^s. , r^^, ^».|;; ^b-^ ^.*%-^ *i,r^-v . iinnc [ '»/' C'A'. aSM!': Vi - '«.;s^ ; a-* f%h '3;riti7;.:- n'^'ji K ;ii;!'r ' <s:ii.uiy.. viii. K A xo.^ jf^'r;.' 3 10 ciJuJi i\ Ji\{ :::) Jnj:kf- .i. n ( im'.i) •V'lt r'v - -V.-^f~^?fl LP-ife- f^^ s.:.... --11 -^M.jj^^^ riB CC./Sfc^RvAriON .<*TC.rj^. OF EI3U:i' "I.VJ, JbO'TSOURCES ^^a THE PHILIPPlVl'fC ;j^...^..-r'^^ I ilRPOHT BY THK ILCJJ CGJJSIiKVA'ilCN M0N:.V:..):;1NG CKNT ^ Pc'jpas-fjr' ')y Roto* C(/X for the TiKD). {'obruary 1988 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge http://www.archive.org/details/conservationstat88coxr . 7' CONTENTS List of Figures, Appendices and Tables iii Summary iy Acknowledgements vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 3 2 METHODS 4 3. FLORA, VEGETATION AND FOREST COVER 3.1 Description of the natural vegetation 4 3.1.1 The forests 4 3.1.2 Other vegetation types 7 3 2 Conservation status of the Philippine flora 8 3.2.1 Introduction 8 3.2.2 Causes of habitat destruction 9 3.2.3 Threatened plant species 11 3. 2. A Centres of plant diversity and endemism 12 4 COASTAL AND MARINE ECOSYSTEMS 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Mangroves 18 4.3 Coral reefs 19 4.4 Seagrass beds 22 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Species of Malarial Parasite in a West African Lizard
    Oecologia (1994) 97:326-332 Springer-Verlag 1994 ORIGINAL PAPER ? Joseph J. Schall Carl R. Bromwich Interspecific interactions tested: two species of malarial parasite in a West African lizard Received: 25 June 1993 / Accepted: 14 December 1993 Abstract Plasmodium giganteum and P. agamae, para- affecting communities of free-living species (competition sites of the rainbow lizard, Agama agama, in West Africa for resources, interference, mutualism, historical chance were studied to determine the nature of any interspecific events), but must also include the influence of the host's interactions between the two malaria species. The plas- immune system which is unique to parasites. The litera- modia are distributed in A. agama throughout the mesic ture on community ecology of free-living organisms has zone of Africa; P. agamae is sometimes found as a soli- long included debate on the relative importance of spe- tary malaria species in populations of the lizard, but P. cies interactions (especially competition) and random giganteum has not been found alone. In 3170 lizards events. This discussion is mirrored in the parasitological from Sierra Leone the prevalence of lizard malaria at 22 literature. Some workers hold that parasite communi- sites varied considerably (8-90% of lizards were infect- ties are structured primarily by competition and there ed), but the ratio of the two species was similar among are "assembly rules" governing coexisting parasite spe- sites (52-91% P. agamae). Larger lizards were more of- cies (Holmes 1961; Esch et al. 1990), whereas others ten infected. Mixed infections occurred 2-5 times more present evidence that these communities are noninterac- often than expected by chance.
    [Show full text]