OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting Warsaw, 6

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting Warsaw, 6 HONORARY CHAIRMAN ADVISORY BOARD (CHAIR) PRESIDENT Yuri Orlov Karl von Schwarzenberg Ludmilla Alexeyeva EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VICE PRESIDENT Aaron Rhodes Sonja Biserko Ulrich Fischer Holly Cartner DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Bjørn Engesland TREASURER Bre Dufour Krassimir Kanev Stein-Ivar Aarsæther Andrzej Rzeplinski Wickenburgg. 14/7, A-1080 Vienna, Austria; Tel +43-1-408 88 22; Fax 408 88 22-50 e-mail: [email protected] – internet: http://www.ihf-hr.org Bank account: Bank Austria Creditanstalt, 0221-00283/00, BLZ 12 000 OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting Warsaw, 6-17 October 2003 _______________________ Interventions and Recommendations by the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) The IHF has consultative status with the United Nations and the Council of Europe. MEMBER AND COOPERATING* COMMITTEES IN: Albania – Austria – Azerbaijan*- Belarus – Bosnia-Herzegovina – Bulgaria – Canada – Croatia – Czech Republic – Denmark – Finland – France – Georgia* Germany – Greece – Hungary – Italy – Kazakhstan – Kosovo – Kyrgyzstan – Latvia – Lithuania – Macedonia – Moldova – Montenegro – The Netherlands Norway – Poland – Romania – Russia – Serbia – Slovakia – Slovenia – Sweden – Switzerland – Ukraine* – United Kingdom – United States – Uzbekistan* COOPERATING ORGANIZATIONS: THE EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTER – HUMAN RIGHTS WITHOUT FRONTIERS The International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) is a non-governmental organization that seeks to promote compliance with the human rights provisions of the Helsinki Final Act and its follow-up documents. In addition to supporting and providing liaison among 41 Helsinki committees and cooperating organizations, the IHF has direct links with human rights activists in countries where no Helsinki committees exist. It has consultative status with the United Nations and the Council of Europe. The IHF represents member and cooperating committees in Albania, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States and Uzbekistan. Other cooperating organizations include the European Roma Rights Centre (Budapest) and Human Rights without Frontiers (Belgium). President: Ludmilla Alexeyeva Vice President: Ulrich Fischer Executive Director: Aaron Rhodes Deputy Executive Director/Legal Counsel: Brigitte Dufour In addition to the IHF member committees and partner organizations, the following persons contributed to the preparation of this publication: Brigitte Dufour, Joachim Frank, Janna Khloudneva, Ilana Much, Lamija Muzurovic, Ann-Sofie Nyman, Aaron Rhodes, Peter Svedberg, Paula Tscherne-Lempiäinen and Nicole Watson Chief Editor: Paula Tscherne-Lempiäinen International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights Wickenburggasse 14/7, A-1080 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 408 88 22 Fax: (+43-1) 408 88 22-50 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.ihf-hr.org Bank account: Bank Austria Creditanstalt, 0221-00283/00 BLZ 12 000 2003 by the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights and IHF Research Foundation. All rights reserved. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS This set of interventions and recommendations has been arranged to mainly follow the schedule of the 2003 OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting. The IHF wishes to emphasize that these interventions do not cover all areas of its concern. For further reference, please see www.ihf- hr.org. page Monday, 6 October: Democratic institutions: Democratic elections 5 Kosovo 9 Tuesday, 7 October: Fundamental freedoms I: Freedom of expression, free media and Information 10 Human rights defenders 17 Freedom of association and peaceful assembly 21 Fundamental freedoms II: Freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief 25 Wednesday, 8 October: Tolerance and non-discrimination I: Roma and Sinti 29 Tolerance and non-discrimination II: Equal opportunities for women and men 35 Thursday, 9 October: Rule of law I: Independence of the judiciary and fair trial 38 Anti-terrorism measures 42 Turkmenistan 47 Rule of law II: Capital punishment 49 Prevention of torture, ill-treatment and police misconduct 51 Friday, 10 October: Humanitarian issues: Trafficking in human beings 56 Migration, refugees and displaced persons: EU 59 Displaced persons 63 International humanitarian law 67 Tuesday, 14 October: Specifically selected topic: Discrimination, racism, xenophobia, and anti-Semitism 69 Racism and discrimination in Europe 74 Hate Speech in Greece 77 Proposal for ad-hoc inter-agency meeting on racism 80 Wednesday, 15 October: Specifically selected topic: National minorities 81 3 4 IHF intervention and recommendations to the 2003 OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS: Democratic elections (Monday, 6 October 2003) Despite international reports to the contrary, the 23 March 2003 constitutional referendum in Chechnya was neither free nor fair, and the official results lacked credibility. According to official Russian information, 89.48 percent of the Chechen electorate went to the polls and almost unanimously voted for the constitution affirming that Chechnya will remain a part of the Russian Federation. In reality, most Chechens interviewed by NGO observers were against the referendum and it appeared clear to all independent observers that the voter turnout was far below those cited by Russian officials. The entire process of drafting a new constitution and of organizing the referendum was among the most illegal and manipulative electoral exercises in the entire post-Soviet period, demonstrating a total lack of transparency in the process and no civil control. Most importantly, the referendum failed to address the main problems in and around Chechnya. Neither security procedures nor open adequate public debate were sufficient to allow for a free and fair referendum. The Chechen people were subjected to a barrage of official propaganda in the lead-up to the referendum implying that a failure to approve the new Constitution would result in continuing violence and war. Local authorities threatened citizens with penalties if they did not go to the polls and internally displaced Chechens in Ingushetia were threatened with the loss of benefits, including humanitarian aid, if they failed to register to vote. The Russian Ministry of Justice forbade NGOs in Chechnya and Ingushetia from campaigning in relation to the referendum. The organization of the referendum, including the transport of ballots to and from voting stations, was carried out by the Russian military. In some localities, soldiers reportedly surrounded the villages and forced villagers to go to polling stations and vote.1 Serious violations of the democratic process have taken place during the registration of candidates and the pre-election campaign leading up to the presidential elections on 15 October 2003 in Azerbaijan. Ayaz Mutallibov, former president of Azerbaijan, and Rasul Quliyev, former speaker of parliament, both in exile, were denied registration. While the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe demanded on 26 June to secure their participation in the electoral process, law enforcement agencies threatened to arrest them should they decide to return to Azerbaijan. Other presidential candidates were also harassed: for example, on two occasions in July, police stopped the cars of the bodyguards of Isa Qambar and Ali Kerimov, both registered presidential candidates representing the opposition. The bodyguards were arrested for allegedly having resisted police officers. It is believed that the allegations were fabricated.2 In Armenia, presidential elections were held in February/March 2003, and the parliamentary elections as well as a referendum on constitutional changes were held in May. The referendum was unlawful insofar as Armenian law does not provide for a referendum to be held simultaneously with elections. 1 IHF, “The Constitutional Referendum in Chechnya Was Neither Free Nor Fair, Official Results Are Not Credible,” 28 March 2003, at http://www.ihf-hr.org/viewbinary/viewhtml.php?doc_id=3372; IHF, “Constitutional Referendum in Chechnya Should be Postponed,” 11 March 2003. 2 Human Rights Center of Azerbaijan, July 2003. 5 Both elections fell seriously short of international standards despite some improvements since previous elections. With regard to both elections, equal conditions were not provided for all candidates, particularly with regard to access to the mass media. Other registered irregularities related to voting, counting and tabulation processes. Ballot box stuffing was widespread. Authorized representatives of the opposition in election commissions and at polling stations were arrested and placed in administrative detention during the presidential elections without meeting due process standards. Opposition candidates faced intimidation during both elections. Prior to the presidential election, state media showed clear bias in favor of the incumbent president. In addition, opposition candidates of the parliamentary elections faced problems with registration -- some could not register at all. The subsequent attempts to restore the right to be elected in court did not yield any positive results. The constituencies of the parliamentary elections were drawn to profit the candidates favored by the authorities and
Recommended publications
  • Who's Who in Politics in Turkey
    WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY Sarıdemir Mah. Ragıp Gümüşpala Cad. No: 10 34134 Eminönü/İstanbul Tel: (0212) 522 02 02 - Faks: (0212) 513 54 00 www.tarihvakfi.org.tr - [email protected] © Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, 2019 WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY PROJECT Project Coordinators İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Editors İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Authors Süreyya Algül, Aslı Aydemir, Gökhan Demir, Ali Yalçın Göymen, Erhan Keleşoğlu, Canan Özbey, Baran Alp Uncu Translation Bilge Güler Proofreading in English Mark David Wyers Book Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Cover Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Printing Yıkılmazlar Basın Yayın Prom. ve Kağıt San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Evren Mahallesi, Gülbahar Cd. 62/C, 34212 Bağcılar/İstanbull Tel: (0212) 630 64 73 Registered Publisher: 12102 Registered Printer: 11965 First Edition: İstanbul, 2019 ISBN Who’s Who in Politics in Turkey Project has been carried out with the coordination by the History Foundation and the contribution of Heinrich Böll Foundation Turkey Representation. WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY —EDITORS İSMET AKÇA - BARIŞ ALP ÖZDEN AUTHORS SÜREYYA ALGÜL - ASLI AYDEMİR - GÖKHAN DEMİR ALİ YALÇIN GÖYMEN - ERHAN KELEŞOĞLU CANAN ÖZBEY - BARAN ALP UNCU TARİH VAKFI YAYINLARI Table of Contents i Foreword 1 Abdi İpekçi 3 Abdülkadir Aksu 6 Abdullah Çatlı 8 Abdullah Gül 11 Abdullah Öcalan 14 Abdüllatif Şener 16 Adnan Menderes 19 Ahmet Altan 21 Ahmet Davutoğlu 24 Ahmet Necdet Sezer 26 Ahmet Şık 28 Ahmet Taner Kışlalı 30 Ahmet Türk 32 Akın Birdal 34 Alaattin Çakıcı 36 Ali Babacan 38 Alparslan Türkeş 41 Arzu Çerkezoğlu
    [Show full text]
  • Here All Continue to Defend Human Rights in Turkey, Despite the Increasing Difficulty and Mounting Pressure Posed by the Government
    Imagine being attacked by the police for dancing in the streets for women’s rights or peacefully marching for LGBTI+ rights. Imagine being arrested for tweeting disapproval of your government; protesting to save a park; signing a peace petition. Imagine your professor being fired, or your doctor being arrested. These are all examples from Turkey’s reality. This series highlights stories of twenty individuals who have chosen to stand up for human rights. The individuals presented here all continue to defend human rights in Turkey, despite the increasing difficulty and mounting pressure posed by the government. Learn more about the everyday people taking everyday actions in Turkey to stand up for human rights. Read DEFENDING HUMAN RIGHTS IN TURKEY their stories, each one a story that needs to be heard. STORIES THAT NEED TO BE HEARD Defending Human Rights in Turkey Not long ago, Turkey was considered a success story of democratic transformation. Today human rights in Turkey are at risk. Turkey displays an increasingly restrictive environment with a distorted system of checks and balances, where the rule of law is undermined. Thousands of journalists, academics, lawyers, and government critics have been sacked, imprisoned, and charged with terror-related or libel crimes. Defending human rights doesn’t have to be a profession; it comes from a belief that all people have the right to live in peace and be treated equally. From doctors to teachers, from plumbers to journalists, everyone can defend human rights. Sustained attention and a proactive strategy by the European Union and its Member States, and the international community as a whole are needed to defend the space in which human rights defenders can continue their peaceful human rights work without risk of reprisals and unfounded litigation for their work.
    [Show full text]
  • State Security Courts, Police Impunity, and the Intimidation of Human Rights Defenders in Turkey
    FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY 22 Fordham Int'l L.J. 2129 Fordham International Law Journal June, 1999 Special Report *2219 JUSTICE ON TRIAL: STATE SECURITY COURTS, POLICE IMPUNITY, AND THE INTIMIDATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN TURKEY Copyright (c) 1999 Fordham University School of Law Report of the Joseph R. Crowley Program/Lawyers Committee for Human Rights: Joint 1998 Mission to Turkey [FNa1] INTRODUCTION In recent years, Turkey's human rights record has emerged as a critical issue in its relations with its allies in Europe and North America. The Turkish government has been criticized for serious violations of human rights ranging from restrictions on *2130 speech and association to the use of torture. [FN1] To its credit, the government has expressed a commitment to improving its human rights record, despite difficult domestic problems including violent confrontation with the Kurdish Workers Party (“PKK”) in southeastern Turkey. [FN2] Reflecting this commitment, Turkey has ratified a number of important human rights treaties including the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“European Convention” or ‘Convention ‘) and the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“Convention Against Torture”). [FN3] Notwithstanding the government's expressed commitment to ending abuses and its international obligations to do so, serious human rights violations persist. Although this report documents a number of these violations directly, it focuses on obstacles*2131 within the Turkish legal system to the improvement of Turkey's human rights record more generally. These obstacles include the existence of specialized political courts, police impunity for human rights violations, and the harassment of lawyers and human rights advocates who seek to hold the state accountable for these violations.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey COI Compilation 2020
    Turkey: COI Compilation August 2020 BEREICH | EVENTL. ABTEILUNG | WWW.ROTESKREUZ.AT ACCORD - Austrian Centre for Country of Origin & Asylum Research and Documentation Turkey: COI Compilation August 2020 The information in this report is up to date as of 30 April 2020, unless otherwise stated. This report serves the specific purpose of collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. It is not intended to be a general report on human rights conditions. The report is prepared within a specified time frame on the basis of publicly available documents as well as information provided by experts. All sources are cited and fully referenced. This report is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Every effort has been made to compile information from reliable sources; users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. © Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD An electronic version of this report is available on www.ecoi.net. Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD Wiedner Hauptstraße 32 A- 1040 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43 1 58 900 – 582 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.redcross.at/accord TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gefährdung Von IHD- Mitgliedern, Vorgehen Gegen «Samstagsmütter»
    Türkei: Gefährdung von IHD- Mitgliedern, Vorgehen gegen «Samstagsmütter» Schnellrecherche der SFH-Länderanalyse Bern, 7. April 2020 Diese Recherche basiert auf Auskünften von Expertinnen und Experten und auf eigenen Recherchen. Entspre- chend den COI-Standards verwendet die SFH öffentlich zugängliche Quellen. Lassen sich im zeitlich begrenzten Rahmen der Recherche keine Informationen finden, werden Expertinnen und Experten beigez ogen. Die SFH do- kumentiert ihre Quellen transparent und nachvollziehbar. Aus Gründen des Quellenschutzes können Kontaktper- sonen anonymisiert werden. Impressum Herausgeberin Schweizerische Flüchtlingshilfe SFH Postfach, 3001 Bern Tel. 031 370 75 75 Fax 031 370 75 00 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.fluechtlingshilfe.ch Spendenkonto: PC 30-1085-7 Sprachversionen Deutsch COPYRIGHT © 2020 Schweizerische Flüchtlingshilfe SFH, Bern Kopieren und Abdruck unter Quellenangabe erlaubt. Fragestellung Der Anfrage an die SFH-Länderanalyse sind die folgenden Fragen entnommen: 1. Besteht für Mitglieder und Führungspersonen der «İnsan Hakları Derneği» (Human Rights Association of Turkey, IHD) in der Türkei eine Gefährdung? Hat sich diese Gefährdung seit Herbst 2017 verschärft? 2. Gibt es Informationen zum Vorgehen gegen die «Samstagsmütter»? Die Informationen beruhen auf einer zeitlich begrenzten Recherche (Schnellrecherche) in öf- fentlich zugänglichen Dokumenten, die der SFH derzeit zur Verfügung stehen, sowie auf den Informationen von sachkundigen Kontaktpersonen. 1 Gefährdung von Menschen, die in «İnsan Hakları Derneği» (IHD) aktiv sind IHD. «İnsan Hakları Derneği» (IHD, in englischer Sprache Human Rights Association of Tur- key) ist nach eigenen Angaben die älteste Menschenrechtsorganisation in der Türkei. Nach eigenen Angaben ist IHD unter den Hauptakteuren in der Türkei, die im Menschenrechtsbe- reich tätig sind. IHD wurde 1986 gegründet und unterhielt im Juni 2019 insgesamt 26 Zweig- stellen und fünf sogenannte «Representatives Offices» und hatte knapp 8000 Mitglieder.
    [Show full text]
  • WEATHERING the STORM Defending Human Rights in Turkey’S Climate of Fear
    WEATHERING THE STORM Defending human rights in Turkey’s climate of fear AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL 1 “I have a small bag ready at home. Every morning I Flowers on the Human Rights sculpture, Yuksel contact two people [to let them know I am still here]. Street Ankara: Since May 2017 the sculpture, which depicts a woman reading I am prepared for what may come.” the UN Declaration of Human Rights, has been Şebnem Korur Fincancı, human rights defender and forensic doctor, facing prosecution for participating encircled by police barriers, in the solidarity campaign for the Kurdish newspaper Özgür Gündem, February 2018. to prevent it being used as location for protests. © Private A chilling climate of fear emergency and during the crackdown after society actors in smear campaigns are is sweeping across Turkish the coup attempt, for example on the arbitrary often a precursor for arrest or prosecution. dismissal of numerous public sector workers As a result, sections of society most at risk society as the Turkish in No end in sight – Purged public sector of human rights abuses – such as women government continues workers denied a future in Turkey as well as and girl survivors of sexual and gender- on the serious allegations of the use of torture based violence, LGBTI people, refugees and to use the state of in the immediate aftermath of the attempted migrants – are denied crucial support and emergency to shrink the coup, Independent monitors must be allowed solidarity as they struggle to defend their space for dissenting or to access detainees amid torture allegations. rights. The climate of fear that exists leads to self-censorship, with activists being afraid to alternative views.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the 2020 International Peace Delegation to İmralı Full Text
    ! REPORT OF 2020 INTERNATIONAL PEACE DELEGATION TO İMRALI International Initiative “Freedom for Öcalan - Peace in Kurdistan”: http://www.freeocalan.org/ 2020 International Peace Delegation to İmralı ! Opening Press Conference at HDP Headquarters Ankara with Pervin Buldan, Julie Ward, Hişyar Özsoy, Melanie Gingell, Ögmundur Jónasson, Shavanah Taj and Felix Padel. Introduction The İmralı Peace Delegation visited Turkey between 11th and 16th February 2020, witnessing and gathering evidence about the state of civil society and human rights in the country. The delegation sought to visit the imprisoned leader of the Kurdish freedom movement Abdullah Öcalan in order to assess his situation and conditions of detention. The annual delegation reports have provided a base measure of human rights in Turkey over the last decade and enabled a diverse group of academics, politicians, lawyers, faith leaders, journalists and trade unionists to visit various locations and assess the situation for themselves. The International Initiative organises the delegations with the primary purpose of keeping the cruel situation of Öcalan’s detention in the public eye, and as part of a wider campaign to highlight the need to reinstitute a peace process in Turkey. The delegation this year consisted of Ögmundur Jónasson, former Justice Minister of Iceland and Honorary Associate of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Julie Ward, UK MEP until January 2020, Shavanah Taj, Leader of the Trade Union Congress in Wales, Felix Padel, sociologist and anthropologist, affiliate of Oxford University, and Melanie Gingell, Barrister, Associate Tenant Doughty Street !1 Chambers, London. It held a series of meetings in Ankara with Ms Pervin Buldan Co- Chair of the People’s Democratic Party (HDP) and Hişyar Özsoy Deputy Co-Chair of HDP, Leaders of the Human Rights Association of Turkey, Liberationist Lawyers Association, the Human Rights Foundation of Turkey, and the Confederal Trade Union of Public Workers.
    [Show full text]
  • General Country of Origin Information Report Turkey
    General Country of Origin Information Report Turkey October 2019 1 General Country of Origin Information Report October 2019 Publication details Location The Hague Prepared by Country of Origin Information Reports Section (DAF/AB) Disclaimer: The Dutch version of this report is leading. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands cannot be held accountable for misinterpretations based on the English version of the report. 2 General Country of Origin Information Report October 2019 Table of Contents Publication details ......................................................................................... 2 1 Politics and security .................................................................................... 5 1.1 Political developments ................................................................................... 5 1.2 The security situation .................................................................................... 9 1.2.1 The attempted coup ...................................................................................... 9 1.2.2 South-east .................................................................................................. 10 1.2.3 Turkish Hizbollah and the Hüda-Par Party ........................................................ 12 2 Human rights ............................................................................................. 14 2.1 Legislation and regulations ............................................................................ 14 2.2 Compliance and violations ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Restrictive Laws, Arbitrary Application - the Pressure on Human Rights Defenders
    Turkey Restrictive laws, arbitrary application - the pressure on human rights defenders Introduction Despite recent legal and constitutional reforms in Turkey, human rights defenders in that country continue to be targeted for harassment and intimidation by state officials, and their activities are still restricted through a huge number of laws and regulations. Those used against human rights activists include Anti-Terror laws, public order legislation, laws on associations and foundations and press laws, with the result that the rights to freedom of association, assembly and expression cannot be exercised fully and freely. Infringement of these rights can also lead to activists suffering violations of other rights, such as to liberty, to security of the person and to a fair trial. The broad restrictions in law on the activities of human rights defenders give state officials many pretexts to exert pressure on such activists, including through arbitrarily detaining them, prosecuting them, and prohibiting their actions. The existence of these restrictive laws and regulations, their abusive interpretation in ways that curtail the rights of human rights defenders, and the failure to implement in practice relevant legislative reforms play out in a pattern of harassment that sits at odds not only with Turkey's international obligations but also with the current reform agenda that has produced positive legislative change in other areas. Human rights defenders continue to face a pattern of harassment. T Human rights defenders hey are placed under surveillance by police officers, and their offices are searched on spurious grounds. Small demonstrations and meetings where press releases are read out are surrounded by largehuge numbers of riot police, who sometimes outnumber the participants, while other police officers record and photograph those attending.
    [Show full text]
  • Defend Human Rights Defenders
    HUMAN RIGHTS AGENDA ASSOCIATION TURKEY: DEFEND HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS 2008 HRAA/Public/ENG-001-2008/Human Rights Defenders ANKARA Guniz Sok. 38/8 06700 Kavaklidere-Ankara/TURKEY Tel: +90312 428 06 10-11 Fax: +90312 428 06 13 E-mail: [email protected] www.rightsagenda.org IZMIR 859 Sok. No:4/605 Sogutlu Ish. Ahmetaga Mah. 35250 Konak-Izmir/TURKEY Tel: +90232 489 55 28 Faks: +90232 489 70 39 DİYARBAKIR Lise Cad. 1. Sok. Gunes Plaza, Kat:3/9 Diyarbakir/TURKEY Tel:+90412 228 79 42 Faks: +90412 228 79 36 Turkey: Defend Human Rights 2008 Human Rights Agenda Association Defenders www.rightsagenda.org CONTENTS Summary …………………………………………………………............... ..p.3 Introduction………………………………………………………………… p.4 - para. 1-3 A- Frame of Definition: Who is a human rights defender? ……………….p. 4-5 para. 4-8 B- Historical Background………………………………………………….p. 5-7 para. 9-14 C- Cases of human right defenders v. Turkey at the ECtHR…………. p. 7-9 para.15- 24 D- Freedom of Association and Human Rights Defenders…………….p. 9-11 para. 25- 31 E- Actions of pressure, violence, demoralization and intimidation of human rights activists in Turkey between 2006 and 2008……………………………...p.11-19 para.32-72 F- Protection of Human Rights Defenders in National and International Law……………………………………………………………………….. p.19-24 para.73-82 Recommendations and Call for Solidarity …………………………….p. 24-25 para. 83-96 2 Turkey: Defend Human Rights 2008 Human Rights Agenda Association Defenders www.rightsagenda.org Summary In particular with the reforms since 2001 as part of the harmonization procedure with the European Union (EU) Turkey has taken positive steps to develop and institutionalize human rights and basic freedoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Asylum Seekers from Turkey Ii
    ASYLUM SEEKERS FROM TURKEY II by David McDowall (a revised, updated edition of the report of a mission to Turkey, October 2000) November 2002 2 Acknowledgement for first edition We are particularly grateful to the Avenue Trust for the major donation that made this mission possible, and to those law firms which also supported the mission financially. We should also like to record our debt to those who helped us prepare, or who gave us useful material: Marion Ellingworth of Amnesty International, Sherman Carroll of the Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture, Veronica Forwood of Reporters Sans Frontieres, Pro Asyl, Izmir War Resister's Association (ISKD), Guido van Leemput of the Study Centre on Turkey and Tina Devadasan of the Kurdish Human Rights Project, Konrad Hirschler and Murvet Ozkan. Others helped but preferred to remain anonymous. We are also grateful to numerous individuals and the staff of organisations who provided advice, information, contacts and other assistance in Turkey, and arranged for us to meet those who had experienced serious violations. These informants are named on page 4. Most of all, we would record our gratitude to those who screwed up their courage to retell their stories of State persecution and whose statements form a vital part of this report. This report was written for, and not by, Asylum Aid, which had no control over the contents. The Mission consisted of Navita Atreya took degrees in chemistry and management at King's College London before qualifying as a barrister. She has been practising since 1995, and has specialised in immigration and asylum law.
    [Show full text]
  • Version 3.0 Rapporten Är Utgiven Av Nationella Samordningsavdelningen, Migrationsanalys – Migrationsverkets Funktion För Land- Och Omvärldsanalys
    1 Landinformation: Turkiet – Lägesbild och påverkan på särskilda grupper 2020-06-08, version 3.0 Rapporten är utgiven av Nationella samordningsavdelningen, Migrationsanalys – Migrationsverkets funktion för land- och omvärldsanalys. Rapporten har publicerats i Migrationsverkets databas för landinformation, Lifos, © Migrationsverket (Swedish Migration Agency), 2020. Publikationen kan laddas ner från http://lifos.migrationsverket.se 2 3 4 1 2 1 Lifos, Lägesanalys: Turkiet: i kölvattnet av kuppförsöket den 15 juli 2016 (version 1.0), 2016-12-09, https://lifosintern.migrationsverket.se/dokument?documentSummaryId=38662 s. 5–6 (Hämtad 2020-03-23) 2 Lifos, Turkiet: Lägesbild två åt efter kuppförsöket (version 2.0), 2019-01-28, https://lifosintern.migrat- ionsverket.se/dokument?documentSummaryId=42606, s.32 (Hämtad 2020-03-23) 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 BBC News, Turkey referendum grants President Erdogan sweeping new powers, 2017-04-16, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39617700 (Hämtad 2020-03-23) 4 Guardian (The), Turkish Referendum: All you need to know, 2017-04-10, https://www.theguard- ian.com/world/2017/apr/10/turkish-referendum-all-you-need-to-know (Hämtad 2020-03-24) 5 New York Times (The), Erdogan tries to ease the pain of Turkey’s bad economy. It’s still hurting, 2019- 03-04, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/world/europe/turkey-economy-erdogan.html (Hämtad 2020- 03-24) 6 Al-Monitor, Erdogan’s war in Idlib faces uphill battle on the home front, 2020-03-11, https://www.al- monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/03/turkey-syria-russia-erdogan-face-uphill-battle-on-home-
    [Show full text]