Development 129

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development 129 pyrolite Documentation Release 0.3.0+88.g052ca43 Morgan Williams Sep 23, 2021 Getting Started 1 Introduction 1 2 Why pyrolite? 3 3 Getting Started 5 4 Development 129 5 Reference 157 Bibliography 297 Python Module Index 299 Index 301 i ii CHAPTER 1 Introduction pyrolite is a set of tools for making the most of your geochemical data. The python package includes functions to work with compositional data, to transform geochemical variables (e.g. elements to oxides), functions for common plotting tasks (e.g. spiderplots, ternary diagrams, bivariate and ternary density diagrams), and numerous auxiliary utilities. • On this site you can browse the API, or look through some of the usage examples. • There’s also a quick installation guide, a list of recent changes and some notes on where the project is heading in the near future. • If you’re interested in contributing to the project, there are many potential avenues, whether you’re experienced with python or not. Note: pyrolite has been published in the Journal of Open Source Software, and a recent publication focusing on using lambdas and tetrads to parameterise Rare Earth Element patterns has been published in Mathematical Geosciences! 1 pyrolite Documentation, Release 0.3.0+88.g052ca43 2 Chapter 1. Introduction CHAPTER 2 Why pyrolite? The name pyrolite is an opportunistic repurposing of a term used to describe an early model mantle composition proposed by Ringwood [Ringwood1962], comprised principally of pyr-oxene & ol-ivine. While the model certainly hasn’t stood the test of time, the approach optimises the aphorism “All models are wrong, but some are useful” [Box1976]. It is with this mindset that pyrolite is built, to better enable you to make use of your geochemical data to build and test geological models. 3 pyrolite Documentation, Release 0.3.0+88.g052ca43 4 Chapter 2. Why pyrolite? CHAPTER 3 Getting Started 3.1 Installation pyrolite is available on PyPi, and can be downloaded with pip: pip install --user pyrolite Note: With pip, a user-level installation is generally recommended (i.e. using the --user flag), especially on systems which have a system-level installation of Python (including *.nix, WSL and MacOS systems); this can avoid some permissions issues and other conflicts. For detailed information on other pip options, see the relevant docs. pyrolite is not yet packaged for Anaconda, and as such conda install pyrolite will not work. 3.1.1 Upgrading pyrolite New versions of pyrolite are released frequently. You can upgrade to the latest edition on PyPi using the --upgrade flag: pip install --upgrade pyrolite See also: Development Installation 3.1.2 Optional Dependencies Optional dependencies (dev, skl, spatial, db, stats, docs) can be specified during pip installation. For example: pip install --user pyrolite[stats] pip install --user pyrolite[dev,docs] 5 pyrolite Documentation, Release 0.3.0+88.g052ca43 3.2 Getting Started Note: This page is under construction. Feel free to send through suggestions or questions. 3.2.1 Getting Set Up Before you can get up and running with pyrolite, you’ll need to have a distribution of Python installed. If you’re joining the scientific Python world, chances are that the Anaconda distributions are a good match for you*0. Check PyPI for the most up to date information regarding pyrolite compatibility, but as of writing this guide, pyrolite is known to work well with Python 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7. When it comes to how you edit files and interact with Python, there are now many different choices (especially for editors), and choosing something which allows you to work the way you wish to work is the key aspect. While you can certainly edit python files (.py) in any text editor, choosing an editor designed for the task makes life easier. Choosing one is subjective - know that many exist, and perhaps try a few. Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) often allow you to quickly edit and run code within the same window (e.g. Spyder, which is typically included in the default Anaconda distribution). Through notebooks and related ideas the Jupyter ecosystem has broadened how people are interacting with code across multiple languages, including Python. For reference, pyrolite has been developed principally in Atom, leveraging the Hydrogen package to provide an interactive coding environment using Jupyter. Finally, consider getting up to speed with simple Git practises for your projects and code such that you can keep versioned histories of your analyses, and have a look at hosted repository services (e.g. GitHub, GitLab). These hosted repositories together with integrated services are often worth taking advantage of (e.g. hosting material and analyses from papers, posters or presentation, and linking this through to Zenodo to get an archived version with a DOI). 3.2.2 Installing pyrolite There’s a separate page dedicated to pyrolite installations, but for most purposes, the best way to install pyrolite is through opening a terminal (an Anaconda terminal, if that’s the distribution you’re using) and type: pip install pyrolite To keep pyrolite up to date (new versions are released often), periodically run the following to update your local version: pip install --upgrade pyrolite 3.2.3 Writing Some Code If you’re new to Python†0, or just new to pyrolite, checking out some of the examples is a good first step. You should be able to copy-paste or download and run each of these examples as written on your own system, or alterna- tively you can run them interatively in your browser thanks to Binder and sphinx-gallery (check for the links towards the bottom of each page). Have a play with these, and adapt them to your own purposes. 0 If you’re strapped for space, or are bloat-averse, you could also consider using Anaconda’s miniconda distributions. 0 If you’re completely new to Python, check out some of the many free online courses to get up to scratch with basic Python concepts, data structures and get in a bit of practice writing code (e.g. the basic Python course on Codecademy). Knowing your way around some of these things before you dive into applying them can help make it a much more surmountable challenge. Remember that the pyrolite community is also around to help out if you get stuck, and we all started from a similar place! There are no ‘stupid questions’, so feel free to ping us on Gitter with any questions or aspects that are proving particularly challenging. 6 Chapter 3. Getting Started pyrolite Documentation, Release 0.3.0+88.g052ca43 3.2.4 Importing Data A large part of the pyrolite API is based around pandas DataFrames. One of the first hurdles for new users is importing their own data tables. To make this as simple as possible, it’s best to organise - or ‘tidy’ - your data tables‡0. Minimise unnecessary whitespace, and where possible make sure your table columns are the first row of your table. In most cases, where these data are in the form of text or Excel files, the typical steps for data import are similar. A few simple examples are given below. To import a table from a .csv file: from pathlib import Path import pandas as pd filepath= Path('./mydata.csv') df= pd.read_csv(filepath) In the case of an excel table: filepath= Path('./mydata.xlsx') df= pd.read_excel(filepath) There is also a pyrolite function which abstracts away these differences by making a few assumptions, and enables you to import the table from either a csv or excel file: from pyrolite.util.pd import read_table df= read_table(filepath) 3.2.5 Gitter Community A Gitter Community has been set up to serve as a landing page for conversations, questions and support regarding the pyrolite python package and related activities. Here we hope to capture questions and bugs from the community such that these can be addressed quickly, and we can ensure pyrolite and its documentation are as useful as possible to the community. Please feel free to use this space to: • Ask questions or seek help about getting started with pyrolite or particular pyrolite features • Get tips for troubleshooting • Discuss the general development of pyrolite • Ask about contributing to pyrolite Items which are related to specific aspects of pyrolite development (requesting a feature, or reporting an identified bug) are best coordinated through GitHub, but feel free to touch base here first. See below and the contribution and development guides for more information. Note that users and contributors in online spaces (including Gitter) are expected to adhere to the Code of Conduct of this project (and any other guidelines of the relevant platform). 3.2.6 Bugs, Debugging & Bug Reporting This section provides some guidance for what to do when things don’t work as expected, and some tips for debugging issues and common errors associated with pyrolite. Note that the scope of these suggestions is necessarily limited, and specific issues which relate more to matplotlib.pyplot, pandas, and numpy are often well documented elsewhere online. 0 Where each variable is a column, and each observation is a row. If you’re unfamiliar with the ‘Tidy Data’ concept, check out [Wickham2014]. 3.2. Getting Started 7 pyrolite Documentation, Release 0.3.0+88.g052ca43 • Checked the documentation, had a look for FAQ and examples here and still stuck? The maintainers are happy to answer questions and help you solve small bugs. It’s useful to know where people get stuck so we can modify things where useful, and this is an easy way to contribute to the project. Consider posting a question on Gitter, and if you think it’s something others may run into or could be a problem related to use of another package, perhaps also consider posting a question on stackoverflow for visibility.
Recommended publications
  • The Eyes Have It
    news and views flow of heat and matter in the interior2. This Irifune and Isshiki1 have shown such transition to higher pressures (as can be seen flow, in turn, drives the tectonic evolution artificial separation to be misleading by in Irifune and Isshiki’s Fig. 3 on page 704), so of the surface, including the occurrence of experimentally demonstrating Mg–Fe ex- the onset of the transition in pyrolite is post- volcanism and seismicity. change between a, b, garnet and clino- poned to greater depths relative to that in Olivine, a solid solution of forsterite pyroxene. We have known5 for some time Fo89. On the other side of the phase change, b (Mg2SiO4) and fayalite (Fe2SiO4), has the that the proportions of these minerals vary does not partition Fe into garnet as strong- a b approximate composition (Mg0.89 Fe0.11)2SiO4 with depth, as shown by the bold white lines ly as does , so is not initially Mg-enriched, (called forsterite-89 or Fo89) in samples from in Fig. 1, but Irifune and Isshiki have now and the completion of the a–b transition the shallow mantle. It transforms from the measured the accompanying variations in is not postponed relative to Fo89. The net olivine (a) phase to wadsleyite (b), changing the compositions of coexisting minerals, effect of postponing onset but not co8m- again to ringwoodite (g) at greater depths shown by the colours. In isolated Fo89 pletion is to concentrate the transition into and eventually breaking down to a mixture of olivine, mineral compositions must remain a narrower range of depths, decreasing the silicate perovskite and magnesiowüstite.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone
    The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone Daniel J. Frost* DOI: 10.2113/GSELEMENTS.4.3.171 he upper mantle is the source of almost all magmas. It contains major body wave velocity structure, such as PREM (preliminary reference transitions in rheological and thermal behaviour that control the character Earth model) (e.g. Dziewonski and Tof plate tectonics and the style of mantle dynamics. Essential parameters Anderson 1981). in any model to describe these phenomena are the mantle’s compositional The transition zone, between 410 and thermal structure. Most samples of the mantle come from the lithosphere. and 660 km, is an excellent region Although the composition of the underlying asthenospheric mantle can be to perform such a comparison estimated, this is made difficult by the fact that this part of the mantle partially because it is free of the complex thermal and chemical structure melts and differentiates before samples ever reach the surface. The composition imparted on the shallow mantle by and conditions in the mantle at depths significantly below the lithosphere must the lithosphere and melting be interpreted from geophysical observations combined with experimental processes. It contains a number of seismic discontinuities—sharp jumps data on mineral and rock properties. Fortunately, the transition zone, which in seismic velocity, that are gener- extends from approximately 410 to 660 km, has a number of characteristic ally accepted to arise from mineral globally observed seismic properties that should ultimately place essential phase transformations (Agee 1998). These discontinuities have certain constraints on the compositional and thermal state of the mantle. features that correlate directly with characteristics of the mineral trans- KEYWORDS: seismic discontinuity, phase transformation, pyrolite, wadsleyite, ringwoodite formations, such as the proportions of the transforming minerals and the temperature at the discontinu- INTRODUCTION ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Transitions in Earth's Mantle and Mantle Mineralogy
    Phase transitions in Earth’s Mantle and Mantle Mineralogy Upper Mantle Minerals: Olivine, Orthopyroxene, Clinopyroxene and Garnet ~13.5 GPa: Olivine Æ Wadsrlyite (DE) transition (ONSET TRANSITION ZONE) ~15.5 GPa: Pyroxene component gradually dissolve into garnet structure, resulting in the completion of pyroxene-majorite transformation >20 GPa: High CaO content in majorite is unfavorable at high pressure, leading to the formation of CaSiO3 perovskite ~24 GPa: Division of transition zone and lower mantle. Sharp transition silicate spinel to ferromagnesium silicate perovskite and magnesiowustite >24 GPa: Most of Al2O3 resides in majorite at transition zone pressures, a transformation from Majorite to Al-bearing orthorhombic perovskite completes at pressure higher than that of post-spinel transformation Lower Mantle Minerals: Orthorhobic perovskite, Magnesiowustite, CaSiO3 perovskite ~27 GPa: Transformation of Al and Si rich basalt to perovskite lithology with assemblage of Al-bearing perovskite, CaSiO3, stishovite and Al-phases Upper Mantle: olivine, garnet and pyroxene Transition zone: olivine (a-phase) transforms to wadsleyite (b-phase) then to spinel structure (g-phase) and finally to perovskite + magnesio-wüstite. Transformations occur at P and T conditions similar to 410, 520 and 660 km seismic discontinuities Xenoliths: (mantle fragments brought to surface in lavas) 60% Olivine + 40 % Pyroxene + some garnet Images removed due to copyright considerations. Garnet: A3B2(SiO4)3 Majorite FeSiO4, (Mg,Fe)2 SiO4 Germanates (Co-, Ni- and Fe-
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Varying Subduction and Rollback Velocities in Slab Stagnation
    Phase transformation of harzburgite and stagnant slab in the mantle transition zone Y. Zh ang 1,2, Y. Wu1, Y. Wang2, Z. Jin1, C. R. Bina3 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources (GPMR), China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China 2Center for Advanced Radiation Sources, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 3Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Subducted materials play an important role in affecting chemical composition and structure of the mantle transition zone. Harzburgite is generally accepted as an important part of subducting slabs, overlain by a layer of basalt. Seismic tomography studies have detected widespread fast anomalies in the mantle transition zone (MTZ) and lower mantle around the circum-Pacific and the Mediterranean region. These anomalies have been interpreted as stagnant oceanic lithosphere materials as these regions are closely associated with subduction zones, where the oceanic lithosphere plunges deeply into the MTZ. However, experimental studies on the phase transformations of harzburgite have been very limited, and no experimental studies have been conducted on the physical properties of harzburgite under MTZ conditions. In this study, we conducted high-temperature and high-pressure experiments, using a 1000-ton Kawai-type multi-anvil apparatus at GPMR, on a natural harzburgite at 14.1-24.2 GPa and 1473-1673 K. At 1673 K, harzburgite transformed to wadsleyite + garnet + clinopyroxene below 19 GPa and further decomposed into an assemblage of ringwoodite + garnet + stishovite above 20 GPa. Some amounts of akimotoite were produced at still higher pressures (22-23 GPa), and finally perovskite and magnesiowustite were found to coexist with garnet at 24.2 GPa.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry
    GEOCHEMISTRY “Structure & Composition of the Earth” (M.Sc. Sem IV) Shekhar Assistant Professor Department of Geology Patna Science College Patna University E-mail: [email protected] Mob: +91-7004784271 Structure of the Earth • Earth structure and it’s composition is the essential component of Geochemistry. • Seismology is the main tool for the determination of the Earth’s interior. • Interpretation of the property is based on the behaviour of two body waves travelling within the interior. Structure of the Earth Variation in seismic body-wave paths, which in turn represents the variation in properties of the earth’s interior. Structure of the Earth Based on seismic data, Earth is broadly divided into- i. The Crust ii. The Mantle iii. The Core *Figure courtesy Geologycafe.com Density, Pressure & Temperature variation with Depth *From Bullen, An introduction to the theory of seismology. Courtesy of Cambridge Cambridge University Press *Figure courtesy Brian Mason: Principle of Geochemistry The crust • The crust is the outermost layer of the earth. • It consist 0.5-1.0 per cent of the earth’s volume and less than 1 per cent of Earth’s mass. • The average density is about “2.7 g/cm3” (average density of the earth is 5.51 g/cm³). • The crust is differentiated into- i) Oceanic crust ii) Continental crust The Oceanic crust • Covers approx. ~ 70% of the Earth’s surface area. • Average thickness ~ 6km (~4km at MOR : ~10km at volcanic plateau) • Mostly mafic in nature. • Relatively younger in age. The Oceanic crust Seismic study shows layered structural arrangement. - Seawater - Sediments - Basaltic layer - Gabbroic layer *Figure courtesy W.M.White: Geochemistry The Continental crust • Heterogeneous in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Structures of Minerals in the Lower Mantle
    6 Crystal Structures of Minerals in the Lower Mantle June K. Wicks and Thomas S. Duffy ABSTRACT The crystal structures of lower mantle minerals are vital components for interpreting geophysical observations of Earth’s deep interior and in understanding the history and composition of this complex and remote region. The expected minerals in the lower mantle have been inferred from high pressure‐temperature experiments on mantle‐relevant compositions augmented by theoretical studies and observations of inclusions in natural diamonds of deep origin. While bridgmanite, ferropericlase, and CaSiO3 perovskite are expected to make up the bulk of the mineralogy in most of the lower mantle, other phases such as SiO2 polymorphs or hydrous silicates and oxides may play an important subsidiary role or may be regionally important. Here we describe the crystal structure of the key minerals expected to be found in the deep mantle and discuss some examples of the relationship between structure and chemical and physical properties of these phases. 6.1. IntrODUCTION properties of lower mantle minerals [Duffy, 2005; Mao and Mao, 2007; Shen and Wang, 2014; Ito, 2015]. Earth’s lower mantle, which spans from 660 km depth The crystal structure is the most fundamental property to the core‐mantle boundary (CMB), encompasses nearly of a mineral and is intimately related to its major physical three quarters of the mass of the bulk silicate Earth (crust and chemical characteristics, including compressibility, and mantle). Our understanding of the mineralogy and density,
    [Show full text]
  • 2.02 Seismological Constraints Upon Mantle Composition C
    2.02 Seismological Constraints upon Mantle Composition C. R. Bina Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA 2.02.1 INTRODUCTION 39 2.02.1.1 General Considerations 39 2.02.1.2 Bulk Sound Velocity 40 2.02.1.3 Acoustic Methods 40 2.02.2 UPPER-MANTLE BULK COMPOSITION 41 2.02.2.1 Overview 41 2.02.2.2 Velocity Contrasts 42 2.02.2.3 Discontinuity Topography 42 2.02.2.4 Sharpness 43 2.02.2.5 Broadening and Bifurcation 43 2.02.3 UPPER-MANTLE HETEROGENEITY 45 2.02.3.1 Subducted Basalts 45 2.02.3.2 Plume Origins 46 2.02.4 LOWER-MANTLE BULK COMPOSITION 48 2.02.4.1 Bulk Fitting 48 2.02.4.2 Depthwise Fitting 49 2.02.5 LOWER-MANTLE HETEROGENEITY 51 2.02.5.1 Overview 51 2.02.5.2 Subducted Oceanic Crust 52 2.02.6 SUMMARY 54 REFERENCES 56 2.02.1 INTRODUCTION and lower mantle? What light can they shed upon 2.02.1.1 General Considerations the nature of velocity heterogeneities in both the upper and lower mantle? It is these questions that Direct sampling of mantle rocks and minerals is we shall seek to address in this chapter. limited to tectonic slices emplaced at the surface Most seismological constraints on mantle com- (see Chapter 2.04), smaller xenoliths transported position are derived by comparison of values of upwards by magmatic processes (see Chapter seismic wave velocities inferred for particular 2.05), and still smaller inclusions in such far- regions within the Earth to the values measured in traveled natural sample chambers as diamonds the laboratory for particular minerals or mineral (see Chapter 2.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Confirming a Pyrolitic Lower Mantle Using Self-Consistent Pressure
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth RESEARCH ARTICLE Confirming a pyrolitic lower mantle using self-consistent 10.1002/2016JB013062 pressure scales and new constraints Key Points: on CaSiO3 perovskite • Modeling the ρ and VΦ profiles of the lower mantle using self-consistent Ningyu Sun1, Zhu Mao1,2, Shuai Yan1, Xiang Wu3, Vitali B. Prakapenka4, and Jung-Fu Lin5,6 pressure scales and new constraints on Ca-Pv 1Laboratory of Seismology and Physics of Earth’s Interior, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Science and • Comparing with PREM, a pyrolitic 2 3 mantle is preferred over a chondritic Technology of China, Hefei, China, National Geophysics Observatory, Mengcheng, China, State Key Laboratory of 4 mantle Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China, Center for Advanced • The amount of Ca-Pv cannot be Radiation Sources, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 5Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of constrained based on the density and Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA, 6Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced bulk sound velocity profiles as its Research, Shanghai, China elasticity lies close to PREM Abstract In this study, we have examined the lower mantle composition and mineralogy by modeling the Correspondence to: density (ρ), bulk sound velocity (VΦ), and dlnρ/dlnVΦ profiles of candidate lower mantle minerals using Z. Mao, literature and new experimental equation of state (EoS) results. For CaSiO3 perovskite, complimentary [email protected] synchrotron X-ray diffraction measurements in a laser-heated diamond anvil cell were conducted up to 156 GPa between 1200 K and 2600 K to provide more reliable constraints on the thermal EoS parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Distribution of Recycled Oceanic Crust in The
    1 The evolution and distribution of recycled oceanic crust in the 2 Earth’s mantle: Insight from geodynamic models a b, a, c a 3 Jun Yan , Maxim D. Ballmer , and Paul J. Tackley a 4 Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland b 5 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom c 6 Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan 7 Corresponding author: Jun Yan ([email protected]) 8 Highlights: 9 • Compositional mantle layering is robustly predicted despite whole-mantle convection. 10 • Basalt-enhanced reservoir forms in the MTZ, independent of mantle viscosity profile. 11 • Basalt fraction in the MTZ is laterally variable, ranging from ~30% to 50%. 12 • A layer beneath the MTZ displays significant (40%~80%) enrichment in harzburgite. 13 • The bulk-silicate Earth may be enriched in basalt relative to upper-mantle pyrolite. 14 Keywords: recycled oceanic crust, compositional mantle layering, chemical heterogeneity, 15 mantle transition zone, thermochemical convection 16 Abstract 17 A better understanding of the Earth’s compositional structure is needed to place the geochemical 18 record of surface rocks into the context of Earth accretion and evolution. Cosmochemical 19 constraints imply that lower-mantle rocks may be enriched in silica relative to upper-mantle 20 pyrolite, whereas geophysical observations support whole-mantle convection and mixing. To 21 resolve this discrepancy, it has been suggested that subducted mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) 22 segregates from subducted harzburgite to accumulate in the mantle transition zone (MTZ) and/or 23 the lower mantle. However, the key parameters that control basalt segregation and accumulation 24 remain poorly constrained.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Relations in MAFSH System up to 21 Gpa: Implications for Water Cycles in Martian Interior
    minerals Article Phase Relations in MAFSH System up to 21 GPa: Implications for Water Cycles in Martian Interior Chaowen Xu 1,* and Toru Inoue 1,2,3 1 Geodynamics Research Center, Ehime University, 2-5 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan; [email protected] 2 Department of Earth and Planetary Systems Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan 3 Hiroshima Institute of Plate Convergence Region Research (HiPeR), Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-050-3699-0952 Received: 3 August 2019; Accepted: 14 September 2019; Published: 16 September 2019 Abstract: To elucidate the water cycles in iron-rich Mars, we investigated the phase relation of a water-undersaturated (2 wt.%) analog of Martian mantle in simplified MgO-Al2O3-FeO-SiO2-H2O (MAFSH) system between 15 and 21 GPa at 900–1500 ◦C using a multi-anvil apparatus. Results showed that phase E coexisting with wadsleyite or ringwoodite was at least stable at 15–16.5 GPa and below 1050 ◦C. Phase D coexisted with ringwoodite at pressures higher than 16.5 GPa and temperatures below 1100 ◦C. The transition pressure of the loop at the wadsleyite-ringwoodite boundary shifted towards lower pressure in an iron-rich system compared with a hydrous pyrolite model of the Earth. Some evidence indicates that water once existed on the Martian surface on ancient Mars. The water present in the hydrous crust might have been brought into the deep interior by the convecting mantle. Therefore, water might have been transported to the deep Martian interior by hydrous minerals, such as phase E and phase D, in cold subduction plates.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Transitions, Element Partitioning, and Density Changes in a Model Lower Mantle Composition T. Irifune
    Earth & Planetary Science Phase transitions, element partitioning, and density changes in a model lower mantle composition Pyrolite is the name of a hypothetical rock, which 75 vol%), (Mg,Fe)O ferropericlase (Fp; 17 vol%), and was proposed as a model mantle material nearly CaSiO 3-rich cubic perovskite (Ca-Pv; 8 vol%) in 50 years ago [1]. Detailed phase relations and virtually constant volume proportions down to a depth associated density changes in this composition have of 1200 km in the lower mantle, which is consistent been studied using a multianvil apparatus (MA), which with earlier reconnaissance studies with a laser- demonstrated that pyrolite is certainly an excellent heated diamond anvil cell (LHDAC). The density model for the upper mantle (3 0- 410 km), the mantle change of the pyrolite remarkably agrees with the transition region (41 0- 660 km), and the uppermost model density profile (PREM) based on seismological part of the lower mantle (66 0- 2900 km) of the Earth. observations, suggesting that this composition is a This kind of study, however, has been limited up to good model for the upper part of the lower mantle. about 30 GPa, equivalent to a depth of ~800 km in the The partition coefficients ( KD) of iron between Fp lower mantle, because of the limitation of pressures and Mg-Pv in pyrolite were determined as a function available in MA [2]. of pressure from the chemical composition data of Recent developments in high-pressure generation these phases, which are plotted in Fig. 2 , where in MA using sintered diamond (SD) anvils enabled us the KD values lower than 1 indicate that iron is to extend this pressure limit toward those approaching preferentially partitioned in Fp.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Revision 3: Phase Transformation of Hydrous Ringwoodite to the Lower
    Revision 3: Phase Transformation of Hydrous Ringwoodite to the Lower-Mantle Phases and the Formation of Dense Hydrous Silica Huawei Chen1, Kurt Leinenweber2, Vitali Prakapenka3, Martin Kunz4, Hans A. Bechtel4, Zhenxian Liu5 and Sang-Heon Shim1 1 School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. 2 Eyring Materials Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. 3 GeoSoilEnviroCars, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 4 Advanced Light Source Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California. 5 Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC. Keywords: stishovite, ringwoodite, bridgmanite, periclase, water, mantle ABstract In order to understand the effects of H2O on the mineral phases forming under the pressure-temperature conditions of the lower mantle, we have conducted laser-heated diamond-anvil cell experiments on hydrous ringwoodite (Mg2SiO4 with 1.1wt% H2O) at pressures between 29 and 59 GPa and temperatures between 1200 and 2400 K. Our experimental results show that hydrous ringwoodite (hRw) converts to crystalline dense hydrous silica, stishovite (Stv) or CaCl2-type SiO2 (mStv), containing 1 wt% H2O together with Brd and MgO at the pressure-temperature conditions expected for shallow lower-mantle depths between approximately 660 to 1600 km. Considering lack of sign for melting in our experiments, our preferred interpretation of the observation is that Brd partially breaks down to dense hydrous silica and periclase (Pc), forming Brd + Pc + Stv mineralogy. Our experiments may provide an explanation for the enigmatic coexistence of Stv and Fp inclusions in lower-mantle diamonds. Introduction Lines of evidence support that the lower mantle has a similar chemical composition to the upper mantle (Kurnosov et al., 2017; Shim et al., 2001a, 2017) that is likely peridotitic or pyrolitic (McDonough and Sun, 1995).
    [Show full text]