2.02 Seismological Constraints Upon Mantle Composition C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2.02 Seismological Constraints Upon Mantle Composition C 2.02 Seismological Constraints upon Mantle Composition C. R. Bina Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA 2.02.1 INTRODUCTION 39 2.02.1.1 General Considerations 39 2.02.1.2 Bulk Sound Velocity 40 2.02.1.3 Acoustic Methods 40 2.02.2 UPPER-MANTLE BULK COMPOSITION 41 2.02.2.1 Overview 41 2.02.2.2 Velocity Contrasts 42 2.02.2.3 Discontinuity Topography 42 2.02.2.4 Sharpness 43 2.02.2.5 Broadening and Bifurcation 43 2.02.3 UPPER-MANTLE HETEROGENEITY 45 2.02.3.1 Subducted Basalts 45 2.02.3.2 Plume Origins 46 2.02.4 LOWER-MANTLE BULK COMPOSITION 48 2.02.4.1 Bulk Fitting 48 2.02.4.2 Depthwise Fitting 49 2.02.5 LOWER-MANTLE HETEROGENEITY 51 2.02.5.1 Overview 51 2.02.5.2 Subducted Oceanic Crust 52 2.02.6 SUMMARY 54 REFERENCES 56 2.02.1 INTRODUCTION and lower mantle? What light can they shed upon 2.02.1.1 General Considerations the nature of velocity heterogeneities in both the upper and lower mantle? It is these questions that Direct sampling of mantle rocks and minerals is we shall seek to address in this chapter. limited to tectonic slices emplaced at the surface Most seismological constraints on mantle com- (see Chapter 2.04), smaller xenoliths transported position are derived by comparison of values of upwards by magmatic processes (see Chapter seismic wave velocities inferred for particular 2.05), and still smaller inclusions in such far- regions within the Earth to the values measured in traveled natural sample chambers as diamonds the laboratory for particular minerals or mineral (see Chapter 2.05). Because of such limited direct assemblages, with such comparisons being made access to mantle materials, knowledge of mantle under comparable regimes of pressure (P) and structure, composition, and processes must be temperature (T ). The primary parameters of augmented by geophysical remote sensing. What interest, then, are the compressional (or P-) wave can various seismological observations tell us velocities (VP)andtheshear(orS-) wave about the major-element composition of the upper velocities ðVSÞ: These wave velocities are simply mantle? How can they constrain possible differ- related to the density (r) and to the two isotropic ences in chemical composition between the upper elastic moduli, the adiabatic bulk modulus (KS) 39 40 Seismological Constraints upon Mantle Composition 2 and the shear (or “rigidity”) modulus (G), via VP ¼ provide independent constraints upon Vf (Bina = 2 = ; ½KS þð4 3ÞG=r and VS ¼ G r respectively. and Helffrich, 1992). Again, chemical composition in regions of Earth’s interior is primarily constrained by mapping 2.02.1.2 Bulk Sound Velocity values of seismic velocities in those regions and Straightforward measurements of elastic prop- comparing the values to those determined for erties of materials can be made via high-pressure various candidate mineral assemblages. The pri- static compression experiments, in which X-ray mary observables in the seismological studies diffraction (XRD) is used to measure the molar consist of measured travel times of various P-and volume (V), or equivalently the density (r), of a S-waves, some of which can in principle constrain material as a function of pressure (P). The density contrasts (Shearer and Flanagan, 1999)from pressure dependence of volume is expressed a large enough set of which values of VP and VS can by the “incompressibility” or isothermal bulk be determined through mathematical inversion. modulus (K ), where K ¼ 2Vð›P=›VÞ : Secondary observables include the measured ampli- T T T tudes of various arriving P-andS-waves, some of This isothermal bulk modulus ðKT Þ measured by static compression differs slightly from the afore- which can in principle constrain density contrasts mentioned adiabatic bulk modulus ðK Þ defining (Shearer and Flanagan, 1999) but these are much S more sensitive to complex properties such as seismic velocities in that the former ðKT Þ describes resistance to compression at constant temperature, anelasticity than are simple travel times. Seismological observables, then, directly yield VP such as is the case in a laboratory device in which a ; sample is slowly compressed in contact with a and VS but static compression experiments directly large thermal reservoir such as the atmosphere. yield Vf. It is common, therefore, to seek to combine seismological VP and VS models to generate a Vf The latter ðKSÞ; alternatively describes resistance to compression under adiabatic conditions, such as model for a region, for comparison to mineralogi- those pertaining when passage of a seismic wave cally constrained Vf values. Such combinatoric causes compression (and relaxation) on a time- procedures can introduce additional errors, how- scale that is short compared to that of thermal ever, in that the VP and VS profiles used may often conduction. Thus, the adiabatic bulk modulus reflect seismic ray paths or frequency bands that generally exceeds the isothermal value (usually by differ from one another. Indeed, special source– a few percent), because it is more difficult to receiver geometries (such as those whose epicentral compress a material whose temperature rises upon distances are so small as to ensure nearly overlap- compression than one which is allowed to conduct ping ray paths) may be necessary to obtain robust away any such excess heat, as described by a estimates of Vf values (Bina and Silver, 1997). ¼ ð þ Þ Nonetheless, comparisons to Vf, rather than to VP simple multiplicative factor KS KT 1 Tag , ; where a is the volumetric coefficient of thermal and VS are commonly used to constrain compo- expansion and g is the thermodynamic Gru¨neisen sitions in the deep interior, because (as noted below) parameter. mineralogical values for G (and hence for VS) Experimentally, the bulk modulus is the become more problematic with increasing depth. simplest parameter to measure, but the seismo- ; logical parameters of primary interest, VP and VS 2.02.1.3 Acoustic Methods both involve the shear modulus as well. It is convenient, therefore, to define a new parameter, Direct laboratory measurements of VP and VS the “bulk sound velocity” (Vf), which eliminates for materials can be made through acoustic all dependence upon the shear modulus (G) methods, such as Brillouin spectroscopy and through a judicious linear combination of the ultrasonic techniques. Brillouin spectroscopy (or 2 squares of the two seismic wave velocities: Vf ¼ “Brillouin scattering”) determines acoustic velo- = 2 = 2: KS r ¼ VP 2 ð4 3ÞVS This new parameter (some- cities in a single crystal through measurements of times thought of as the P-wave velocity of an the Doppler shifts experienced by visible light “equivalent” fluid, for which G ¼ 0) can be scattering off the faces of a single crystal in which determined directly from static compression thermally induced acoustic waves are propaga- 2 = = data: Vf ¼ KS r ¼ð1 þ TagÞð›P ›rÞT . The bulk ting. Because the technique employs single sound velocity possesses another desirable fea- crystals, full elasticity tensors (rather than just ture, in that it can also be constrained indirectly isotropic VP and VS) can be determined, which are through chemical equilibrium experiments. useful in studies of velocity anisotropy. The Chemical equilibria describe free energy minima; technique requires only small samples, and the pressure dependence of free energy is because visible light is employed, the samples described by the molar volume, and the pressure may be placed in an optically transparent dependence of volume (or density) is described diamond-anvil cell (DAC) in order to make by KT and hence Vf. Thus, experimental deter- measurements at elevated pressures and tempera- minations of equilibrium phase boundaries can tures. DAC studies yielding VP and VS may be Upper-mantle Bulk Composition 41 combined with XRD analyses yielding r, to allow the compositions of mantle-derived melts (see for direct determination of KS and G (and hence Chapter 2.08), various cosmochemical arguments Vf) for single crystals (Zha et al., 1998a). (see Chapters 2.01 and 2.15), and simple geophy- The second group of acoustic methods, the sical considerations, the mineralogy of the upper ultrasonic techniques, require larger samples but mantle is commonly concluded to resemble that of can be performed on either single crystals or some sort of peridotite (McDonough and Rudnick, polycrystalline aggregates. They require experi- 1998). Perhaps the most frequently invoked model mental measurement (via interferometry) of the composition is that of “pyrolite” (Ringwood, travel times of two consecutive ultrasonic echoes 1975, 1989), which contains ,60% olivine by from the ends of a shaped sample, combined with volume, the depth-varying properties of which are measurement of the length of the sample. These dominated by progressive high-pressure phase measurements directly yield VP and VS; rather than transitions from olivine (a) to wadsleyite (b, also full anisotropic elasticity tensors, but this is usually called “modified spinel”) to ringwoodite (g, also sufficient (unless patterns of seismic velocity called “silicate spinel”) and thence to a mixture of anisotropy are to be used to map strain fields in silicate perovskite (pv) and magnesiowu¨stite (mw, the mantle). Samples may be placed in a multi- also called “ferropericlase”). The remaining, anvil cell (MAC) to make measurements at nonolivine, components are orthopyroxene elevated pressures and temperatures, and simul- (opx), clinopyroxene (cpx), and garnet (gt), and taneous (usually synchrotron) XRD analysis can these undergo more gradual high-pressure tran- then be used to keep track of associated changes in sitions as the pyroxenes dissolve into the garnet, sample length. Again, MAC studies yielding VP with the resulting “garnet–majorite” solid solu- and VS may be combined with r measurements tion (gt–mj) eventually transforming to silicate from the XRD analyses to directly yield KS and G perovskite as well (Figure 1).
Recommended publications
  • Mantle Transition Zone Structure Beneath Northeast Asia from 2-D
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Mantle Transition Zone Structure Beneath Northeast 10.1029/2018JB016642 Asia From 2‐D Triplicated Waveform Modeling: Key Points: • The 2‐D triplicated waveform Implication for a Segmented Stagnant Slab fi ‐ modeling reveals ne scale velocity Yujing Lai1,2 , Ling Chen1,2,3 , Tao Wang4 , and Zhongwen Zhan5 structure of the Pacific stagnant slab • High V /V ratios imply a hydrous p s 1State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and/or carbonated MTZ beneath 2 3 Northeast Asia Beijing, China, College of Earth Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, CAS Center for • A low‐velocity gap is detected within Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing, China, 4Institute of Geophysics and Geodynamics, School of Earth the stagnant slab, probably Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, 5Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of suggesting a deep origin of the Technology, Pasadena, California, USA Changbaishan intraplate volcanism Supporting Information: Abstract The structure of the mantle transition zone (MTZ) in subduction zones is essential for • Supporting Information S1 understanding subduction dynamics in the deep mantle and its surface responses. We constructed the P (Vp) and SH velocity (Vs) structure images of the MTZ beneath Northeast Asia based on two‐dimensional ‐ Correspondence to: (2 D) triplicated waveform modeling. In the upper MTZ, a normal Vp but 2.5% low Vs layer compared with L. Chen and T. Wang, IASP91 are required by the triplication data. In the lower MTZ, our results show a relatively higher‐velocity [email protected]; layer (+2% V and −0.5% V compared to IASP91) with a thickness of ~140 km and length of ~1,200 km [email protected] p s atop the 660‐km discontinuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Earth Structure: Lower Mantle and D"
    This article was originally published in Treatise on Geophysics, Second Edition, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Lay T Deep Earth Structure: Lower Mantle and D″. In: Gerald Schubert (editor-in-chief) Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edition, Vol 1. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 683-723. Author's personal copy 00 1.22 Deep Earth Structure: Lower Mantle and D T Lay, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA ã 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1.22.1 Lower Mantle and D00 Basic Structural Attributes 684 1.22.1.1 Elastic Parameters, Density, and Thermal Structure 684 1.22.1.2 Mineralogical Structure 685 1.22.2 One-Dimensional Lower Mantle Structure 686 1.22.2.1 Body-Wave Travel Time and Slowness Constraints 687 1.22.2.2 Surface-Wave/Normal-Mode Constraints 688 1.22.2.3 Attenuation Structure 688 1.22.3 Three-Dimensional
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Research of the Sco Countries: Synergy and Integration 上合组织国家的科学研究:协同和一体化
    SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF THE SCO COUNTRIES: SYNERGY AND INTEGRATION 上合组织国家的科学研究:协同和一体化 Materials of the Date: International Conference November 19 Beijing, China 2019 上合组织国家的科学研究:协同和一体化 国际会议 参与者的英文报告 International Conference “Scientific research of the SCO countries: synergy and integration” Part 1: Participants’ reports in English 2019年11月19日。中国北京 November 19, 2019. Beijing, PRC Materials of the International Conference “Scientific research of the SCO countries: synergy and integration”. Part 1 - Reports in English (November 19, 2019. Beijing, PRC) ISBN 978-5-905695-74-2 这些会议文集结合了会议的材料 - 研究论文和科学工作 者的论文报告。 它考察了职业化人格的技术和社会学问题。 一些文章涉及人格职业化研究问题的理论和方法论方法和原 则。 作者对所引用的出版物,事实,数字,引用,统计数据,专 有名称和其他信息的准确性负责 These Conference Proceedings combine materials of the conference – research papers and thesis reports of scientific workers. They examines tecnical and sociological issues of research issues. Some articles deal with theoretical and methodological approaches and principles of research questions of personality professionalization. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of cited publications, facts, figures, quotations, statistics, proper names and other information. ISBN 978-5-905695-74-2 © Scientific publishing house Infinity, 2019 © Group of authors, 2019 CONTENTS ECONOMICS 可再生能源发展的现状与前景 Current state and prospects of renewable energy sources development Linnik Vladimir Yurievich, Linnik Yuri Nikolaevich...........................................12 JURISPRUDENCE 法律领域的未命名合同 Unnamed contracts in the legal field Askarov Nosirjon Ibragimovich...........................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • INTERIOR of the EARTH / an El/EMEI^TARY Xdescrrpntion
    N \ N I 1i/ / ' /' \ \ 1/ / / s v N N I ' / ' f , / X GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 532 / N X \ i INTERIOR OF THE EARTH / AN El/EMEI^TARY xDESCRrPNTION The Interior of the Earth An Elementary Description By Eugene C. Robertson GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 532 Washington 1966 United States Department of the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary Geological Survey H. William Menard, Director First printing 1966 Second printing 1967 Third printing 1969 Fourth printing 1970 Fifth printing 1972 Sixth printing 1976 Seventh printing 1980 Free on application to Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey 1200 South Eads Street, Arlington, VA 22202 CONTENTS Page Abstract ......................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................... 1 Surface observations .............................................. 1 Openings underground in various rocks .......................... 2 Diamond pipes and salt domes .................................. 3 The crust ............................................... f ........ 4 Earthquakes and the earth's crust ............................... 4 Oceanic and continental crust .................................. 5 The mantle ...................................................... 7 The core ......................................................... 8 Earth and moon .................................................. 9 Questions and answers ............................................. 9 Suggested reading ................................................ 10 ILLUSTRATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • The Eyes Have It
    news and views flow of heat and matter in the interior2. This Irifune and Isshiki1 have shown such transition to higher pressures (as can be seen flow, in turn, drives the tectonic evolution artificial separation to be misleading by in Irifune and Isshiki’s Fig. 3 on page 704), so of the surface, including the occurrence of experimentally demonstrating Mg–Fe ex- the onset of the transition in pyrolite is post- volcanism and seismicity. change between a, b, garnet and clino- poned to greater depths relative to that in Olivine, a solid solution of forsterite pyroxene. We have known5 for some time Fo89. On the other side of the phase change, b (Mg2SiO4) and fayalite (Fe2SiO4), has the that the proportions of these minerals vary does not partition Fe into garnet as strong- a b approximate composition (Mg0.89 Fe0.11)2SiO4 with depth, as shown by the bold white lines ly as does , so is not initially Mg-enriched, (called forsterite-89 or Fo89) in samples from in Fig. 1, but Irifune and Isshiki have now and the completion of the a–b transition the shallow mantle. It transforms from the measured the accompanying variations in is not postponed relative to Fo89. The net olivine (a) phase to wadsleyite (b), changing the compositions of coexisting minerals, effect of postponing onset but not co8m- again to ringwoodite (g) at greater depths shown by the colours. In isolated Fo89 pletion is to concentrate the transition into and eventually breaking down to a mixture of olivine, mineral compositions must remain a narrower range of depths, decreasing the silicate perovskite and magnesiowüstite.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone
    The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone Daniel J. Frost* DOI: 10.2113/GSELEMENTS.4.3.171 he upper mantle is the source of almost all magmas. It contains major body wave velocity structure, such as PREM (preliminary reference transitions in rheological and thermal behaviour that control the character Earth model) (e.g. Dziewonski and Tof plate tectonics and the style of mantle dynamics. Essential parameters Anderson 1981). in any model to describe these phenomena are the mantle’s compositional The transition zone, between 410 and thermal structure. Most samples of the mantle come from the lithosphere. and 660 km, is an excellent region Although the composition of the underlying asthenospheric mantle can be to perform such a comparison estimated, this is made difficult by the fact that this part of the mantle partially because it is free of the complex thermal and chemical structure melts and differentiates before samples ever reach the surface. The composition imparted on the shallow mantle by and conditions in the mantle at depths significantly below the lithosphere must the lithosphere and melting be interpreted from geophysical observations combined with experimental processes. It contains a number of seismic discontinuities—sharp jumps data on mineral and rock properties. Fortunately, the transition zone, which in seismic velocity, that are gener- extends from approximately 410 to 660 km, has a number of characteristic ally accepted to arise from mineral globally observed seismic properties that should ultimately place essential phase transformations (Agee 1998). These discontinuities have certain constraints on the compositional and thermal state of the mantle. features that correlate directly with characteristics of the mineral trans- KEYWORDS: seismic discontinuity, phase transformation, pyrolite, wadsleyite, ringwoodite formations, such as the proportions of the transforming minerals and the temperature at the discontinu- INTRODUCTION ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiography of the Seafloor Hypsometric Curve for Earth’S Solid Surface
    OCN 201 Physiography of the Seafloor Hypsometric Curve for Earth’s solid surface Note histogram Hypsometric curve of Earth shows two modes. Hypsometric curve of Venus shows only one! Why? Ocean Depth vs. Height of the Land Why do we have dry land? • Solid surface of Earth is Hypsometric curve dominated by two levels: – Land with a mean elevation of +840 m = 0.5 mi. (29% of Earth surface area). – Ocean floor with mean depth of -3800 m = 2.4 mi. (71% of Earth surface area). If Earth were smooth, depth of oceans would be 2450 m = 1.5 mi. over the entire globe! Origin of Continents and Oceans • Crust is formed by differentiation from mantle. • A small fraction of mantle melts. • Melt has a different composition from mantle. • Melt rises to form crust, of two types: 1) Oceanic 2) Continental Two Types of Crust on Earth • Oceanic Crust – About 6 km thick – Density is 2.9 g/cm3 – Bulk composition: basalt (Hawaiian islands are made of basalt.) • Continental Crust – About 35 km thick – Density is 2.7 g/cm3 – Bulk composition: andesite Concept of Isostasy: I If I drop a several blocks of wood into a bucket of water, which block will float higher? A. A thick block made of dense wood (koa or oak) B. A thin block made of light wood (balsa or pine) C. A thick block made of light wood (balsa or pine) D. A thin block made of dense wood (koa or oak) Concept of Isostasy: II • Derived from Greek: – Iso equal – Stasia standing • Density and thickness of a body determine how high it will float (and how deep it will sink).
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Subduction Zones on the Structure of the Small-Scale Currents at Core-Mantle Boundary
    Effect of Subduction Zones on the Structure of the Small-Scale Currents at Core-Mantle Boundary. Sergey Ivanov1, Irina Demina1, Sergey Merkuryev1,2 1St-Petersburg Filial of Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio wave Propagation (SPbF IZMIRAN) 2Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences Universitetskaya nab., 7-9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia [email protected] Abstract. The purpose of this work is to compare kinematics of small-scale current vortices located near the core-mantle boundary with high-speed anomalies of seismic wave velocity in the lowest mantle asso- ciated with the subduction zones. The small-scale vortex paths were early obtained by the authors in the frame of the macro model of the main geomagnetic field sources. Two sources were chosen whose kine- matics are characterized by the complete absence of the western drift and whose paths have a very com- plex shape. Both sources are located in the vicinity of the subduction zones characterized by the extensive coherent regions with increased speed of seismic waves in the lowest mantle. One of them is geograph- ically located near the western coast of Canada and the second one is located in the vicinity of Sumatra. For this study we used the global models of the heterogeneities of seismic wave velocity. It was obtained that the complex trajectories of the vortices is fully consistent with the high-speed anomalies of seismic wave velocity in the lowest mantle. It can be assumed that mixing up with the matter of the lowest man- tle, the substance of the liquid core rises along the lowest mantle channel and promotes its further in- crease.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Transitions in Earth's Mantle and Mantle Mineralogy
    Phase transitions in Earth’s Mantle and Mantle Mineralogy Upper Mantle Minerals: Olivine, Orthopyroxene, Clinopyroxene and Garnet ~13.5 GPa: Olivine Æ Wadsrlyite (DE) transition (ONSET TRANSITION ZONE) ~15.5 GPa: Pyroxene component gradually dissolve into garnet structure, resulting in the completion of pyroxene-majorite transformation >20 GPa: High CaO content in majorite is unfavorable at high pressure, leading to the formation of CaSiO3 perovskite ~24 GPa: Division of transition zone and lower mantle. Sharp transition silicate spinel to ferromagnesium silicate perovskite and magnesiowustite >24 GPa: Most of Al2O3 resides in majorite at transition zone pressures, a transformation from Majorite to Al-bearing orthorhombic perovskite completes at pressure higher than that of post-spinel transformation Lower Mantle Minerals: Orthorhobic perovskite, Magnesiowustite, CaSiO3 perovskite ~27 GPa: Transformation of Al and Si rich basalt to perovskite lithology with assemblage of Al-bearing perovskite, CaSiO3, stishovite and Al-phases Upper Mantle: olivine, garnet and pyroxene Transition zone: olivine (a-phase) transforms to wadsleyite (b-phase) then to spinel structure (g-phase) and finally to perovskite + magnesio-wüstite. Transformations occur at P and T conditions similar to 410, 520 and 660 km seismic discontinuities Xenoliths: (mantle fragments brought to surface in lavas) 60% Olivine + 40 % Pyroxene + some garnet Images removed due to copyright considerations. Garnet: A3B2(SiO4)3 Majorite FeSiO4, (Mg,Fe)2 SiO4 Germanates (Co-, Ni- and Fe-
    [Show full text]
  • Label and Describe the Earth Diagram
    Name_________________________class______ Label and Describe the Earth Diagram Read the definitions then use the information to color code, label and describe IN YOUR OWN WORDS each section of the diagram below. Definitions: crust – (green) the rigid, rocky outer surface of the Earth, composed mostly of basalt and granite. The crust is the thinnest of all layers. It is thicker on continents & thinner under the oceans. inner core – (gray) the solid iron-nickel center of the Earth that is very hot and under great pressure. mantle – (orange) a rocky layer located under the crust - it is composed of silicon, oxygen, magnesium, iron, aluminum, and calcium. Convection (heat) currents carry heat from the hot inner mantle to the cooler outer mantle. outer core – (red) the molten iron-nickel layer that surrounds the inner core. ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________ Name_________________________________cLass________ Label the OUTER LAYERS of the Earth This is a cross section of only the upper layers of the Earth’s surface. Read the definitions below and use the information to locate label and describe IN TWO WORDS the outer layers of the Earth. One has been done for you. continental crust – thick, top Continental Crust – (green) the thick parts of the Earth's crust, not located under the ocean; makes up the comtinents. Oceanic Crust – (brown) thinner more dense parts of the Earth's crust located under the oceans. Ocean – (blue) large bodies of water sitting atop oceanic crust. Lithosphere– (outline in black) made of BOTH the crust plus the rigid upper part of the upper mantle.
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Varying Subduction and Rollback Velocities in Slab Stagnation
    Phase transformation of harzburgite and stagnant slab in the mantle transition zone Y. Zh ang 1,2, Y. Wu1, Y. Wang2, Z. Jin1, C. R. Bina3 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources (GPMR), China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China 2Center for Advanced Radiation Sources, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 3Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Subducted materials play an important role in affecting chemical composition and structure of the mantle transition zone. Harzburgite is generally accepted as an important part of subducting slabs, overlain by a layer of basalt. Seismic tomography studies have detected widespread fast anomalies in the mantle transition zone (MTZ) and lower mantle around the circum-Pacific and the Mediterranean region. These anomalies have been interpreted as stagnant oceanic lithosphere materials as these regions are closely associated with subduction zones, where the oceanic lithosphere plunges deeply into the MTZ. However, experimental studies on the phase transformations of harzburgite have been very limited, and no experimental studies have been conducted on the physical properties of harzburgite under MTZ conditions. In this study, we conducted high-temperature and high-pressure experiments, using a 1000-ton Kawai-type multi-anvil apparatus at GPMR, on a natural harzburgite at 14.1-24.2 GPa and 1473-1673 K. At 1673 K, harzburgite transformed to wadsleyite + garnet + clinopyroxene below 19 GPa and further decomposed into an assemblage of ringwoodite + garnet + stishovite above 20 GPa. Some amounts of akimotoite were produced at still higher pressures (22-23 GPa), and finally perovskite and magnesiowustite were found to coexist with garnet at 24.2 GPa.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry
    GEOCHEMISTRY “Structure & Composition of the Earth” (M.Sc. Sem IV) Shekhar Assistant Professor Department of Geology Patna Science College Patna University E-mail: [email protected] Mob: +91-7004784271 Structure of the Earth • Earth structure and it’s composition is the essential component of Geochemistry. • Seismology is the main tool for the determination of the Earth’s interior. • Interpretation of the property is based on the behaviour of two body waves travelling within the interior. Structure of the Earth Variation in seismic body-wave paths, which in turn represents the variation in properties of the earth’s interior. Structure of the Earth Based on seismic data, Earth is broadly divided into- i. The Crust ii. The Mantle iii. The Core *Figure courtesy Geologycafe.com Density, Pressure & Temperature variation with Depth *From Bullen, An introduction to the theory of seismology. Courtesy of Cambridge Cambridge University Press *Figure courtesy Brian Mason: Principle of Geochemistry The crust • The crust is the outermost layer of the earth. • It consist 0.5-1.0 per cent of the earth’s volume and less than 1 per cent of Earth’s mass. • The average density is about “2.7 g/cm3” (average density of the earth is 5.51 g/cm³). • The crust is differentiated into- i) Oceanic crust ii) Continental crust The Oceanic crust • Covers approx. ~ 70% of the Earth’s surface area. • Average thickness ~ 6km (~4km at MOR : ~10km at volcanic plateau) • Mostly mafic in nature. • Relatively younger in age. The Oceanic crust Seismic study shows layered structural arrangement. - Seawater - Sediments - Basaltic layer - Gabbroic layer *Figure courtesy W.M.White: Geochemistry The Continental crust • Heterogeneous in nature.
    [Show full text]