DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Wheat Aphid: Tactics for Future Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Wheat Aphid: Tactics for Future Control RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID: TACTICS FOR FUTURE CONTROL A RESOURCE FOR AUSTRALIAN GRAIN GROWERS AND ADVISERS JULY 2017 SOUTH Title: Russian Wheat Aphid: Tactics for Future Control Project Code: ACO00020-B Authors: AgCommunicators ©Grains Research and Development Corporation 2017 ISBN: 978-1-921779-41-1 (online only) Contact • Telephone: 02 6166 4500 • Email: [email protected] • Internet: www.grdc.com.au • Facebook: www.facebook.com/theGRDC/ • Twitter: https://twitter.com/theGRDC All Rights Reserved This publication is copyright. Except as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (Commonwealth) and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or otherwise, without the specific permission of the copyright owner. Disclaimer Any recommendations, suggestions or opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily represent the policy or views of the Grains Research and Development Corporation. No person should act on the basis of the contents of this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. The Corporation and contributors to this Fact Sheet may identify products by proprietary or trade names to help readers identify particular types of products. We do not endorse or recommend the products of any manufacturer referred to. Other products may perform as well as or better than those specifically referred to. The GRDC will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the information in this publication. CAUTION: RESEARCH ON UNREGISTERED AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL USE. Any research with unregistered agricultural chemicals or of unregistered products reported in this document does not constitute a recommendation for that particular use by the authors or the authors’ organisations. All agricultural chemicals must accord with the currently registered label for that particular agricultural chemical, crop, pest and region. Authors Paul Umina1,2, Greg Baker3, Owain Edwards4 1 cesar, 293 Royal Parade, Parkville, VICTORIA 2 The University of Melbourne, School of BioSciences, Parkville, VICTORIA 3 South Australian Research and Development Institute, Waite Campus, Adelaide, SA 4 CSIRO Land & Water, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Underwood Ave, Floreat, WA Editors Belinda Cay, Deanna Lush AgCommunicators, 272 Magill Road, Beulah Park, SA Acknowledgements Tony Craddock, Mick Faulkner, Maarten van Helden, Garry McDonald, Julia Severi, Samantha Ward, and Craig Ruchs. 2 RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID: TACTICS FOR FUTURE CONTROL Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................5 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................7 2.0 Global distribution ..............................................................................8 3.0 Incursion into Australia ........................................................................9 4.0 Identification .....................................................................................10 5.0 Hosts ..............................................................................................12 6.0 Feeding behaviour ............................................................................12 7.0 Symptoms ........................................................................................15 8.0 Vector for disease .............................................................................16 9.0 Yield loss .........................................................................................18 10.0 Reproduction ....................................................................................19 11.0 Dispersal .........................................................................................21 12.0 Environmental influences ...................................................................22 13.0 Monitoring ......................................................................................23 14.0 Case study - RWA dynamics in 2016 .....................................................24 15.0 Management for 2017 and beyond ......................................................26 15.1 Assessment of risks ..........................................................................26 Weather ..........................................................................................26 Crop agronomy ................................................................................26 15.2 Controlling volunteers and alternative plant hosts ...................................26 15.3 Natural enemies ............................................................................... 27 15.4 Chemical management ......................................................................28 15.5 Insecticide seed treatments ................................................................29 15.6 Genetic resistance ............................................................................30 16.0 Ongoing monitoring of spread ............................................................32 17.0 FAQs .............................................................................................. 34 18.0 References .....................................................................................36 RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID: TACTICS FOR FUTURE CONTROL 3 Russian Wheat Aphid management – An integrated approach to control in Australia based on assessment of risk Monitoring • Monitor crops regularly throughout the season, checking • Preserve populations of predators and other beneficials to and recording population trends. help control aphid numbers. • Crops can be infested under warmer conditions in autumn, • Managing the green bridge over summer and autumn will during the early stages of establishment, from wingless reduce the refuges which enable aphids to carry over from aphids walking off nearby senescing hosts. one season to the next. Grass weeds and cereal volunteers • Intensive monitoring of early-sown crops, including cereals should be targeted. sown as pasture, should occur for the first 4-8 weeks after sowing. Chemical management • Populations frequently start to increase as temperatures • Adopt a threshold-based management strategy. Chemical warm in spring or typically from tillering onwards. control is warranted if infestations exceed thresholds of 20 • Stressed areas of the paddock are often the first to be per cent of seedlings infested up to the start of tillering and infested and hence monitoring may specifically target these 10 per cent of tillers infested thereafter. Crop/yield loss may areas first. be minimised through protection of the top three (major yield contributing) leaves. Symptoms • If spraying is warranted, use softer chemistry (e.g. • Russian wheat aphid (RWA) can be detected in cereal pirimicarb) where possible to encourage natural predators crops by visual examinations. Plants will show characteristic and beneficial insects, especially early in the season. symptoms such as chlorosis; necrosis; wilting, stunting; leaf • Avoid prophylactic insecticide applications. streaking with whitish, yellow and purple longitudinal leaf • Chlorpyrifos and pirimicarb are currently registered for markings; trapped awns (which give a hooked appearance); control under two Australian Pesticides and Veterinary stunted growth; rolled leaves and heads that fail to flower. Medicines Authority (APVMA) Emergency Use Permits. • Growers should first inspect inside the leaf rolls and newest Keep chlorpyrifos for heavy infestations. Good spray leaves for aphid infestations. coverage and consideration of weather conditions (temperature, rainfall) in the 24 hours prior and shortly after Environmental conditions application are important. • RWA is primarily associated with cereal production regions characterised by warmer, drier climates. Seed treatments • It is less prevalent in higher rainfall areas, with heavy rainfall • Neonicotinoid seed treatments are expected to provide reported to cause 50 per cent mortality. effective early season control of RWA. Preliminary evidence • Despite having a significantly higher tolerance to cold indicates the length of protection is expected to be temperatures than other cereal aphids, the population equivalent to that observed for other cereal aphid species. growth of RWA will be reduced with the onset of cold and • Prophylactic use of neonicotinoid seed treatments is wet conditions. discouraged and use should be targeted at those situations • Frequent spring rainfall and dry/hot summer conditions (no deemed to be of higher risk (early sowing, especially early green bridge) will lower the risk of RWA infestations. sown barley crops; or areas where volunteer cereals and/or live aphids are identified prior to sowing). Management • Wherever possible, save pesticide options until periods Report sightings of peak aphid activity, during early crop establishment in • Grain growers and advisers across Australia should remain autumn or during spring when populations are likely to vigilant and keep a look out for unusual aphid activity in increase and protection of the flag leaf is vital to maximise cereal crops. suspected infestations in areas where RWA grain fill. Currently registered foliar applied insecticide has not been confirmed should be reported to your state sprays do not provide any meaningful preventative activity. or territory’s department of agriculture or primary industries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russian Wheat Aphid
    Fact sheet Russian wheat aphid What is Russian wheat aphid? Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) is a soft bodied insect that feeds mainly on wheat and barley, but can attack most cereal crops. If this pest enters Australia, it has been estimated that it could cause significant damage to crops, resulting in up to 75% yield losses. è è What does it look like? The aphid is small (up to 1.8 mm long), has a ‘needle-like’ mouthpart, and is light green in colour. The body is elongated compared with other cereal Bugwood.org Frank Peairs, Colorado State University, Wingless adult Russian wheat aphid, showing lack of aphid species. Adults can be winged or wing-less. siphuncles (‘exhaust pipes’ – circled) and presence of a Juveniles (nymphs) look similar to adults but lack ‘double tail’ end (cauda – arrowheads) wings. Characteristic features include dual structures at the rear (cauda) of the insect giving it a ‘double-tail’ appearance (see arrowheads in image top right) and lack visible siphuncles (‘exhaust pipes’ – circles in images on right) that are characteristic for most aphids. What can it be confused with? If it were present, Russian wheat aphid could be found with other cereal aphids on crops. The elongated body shape and lack of ‘exhaust SARDI pipes’ distinguish this aphid from common cereal Adult Oat aphid, with siphuncles (‘exhaust pipe’) structures species (compare top image to middle image). (circled) and no double tail What should I look for? Whilst feeding, the aphid injects salivary toxins into the plant tissue causing the leaves to roll up and white, purple or yellowish streaks to form.
    [Show full text]
  • Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Panhandle Research and Extension Center Agricultural Research Division of IANR 2008 Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA Kristopher Giles Oklahoma State University, [email protected] Gary L. Hein University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Frank Peairs Colorado State University - Fort Collins Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/panhandleresext Part of the Agriculture Commons Giles, Kristopher; Hein, Gary L.; and Peairs, Frank, "Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA" (2008). Panhandle Research and Extension Center. 33. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/panhandleresext/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural Research Division of IANR at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Panhandle Research and Extension Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 19 Areawide Pest Management of Cereal Aphids in Dryland Wheat Systems of the Great Plains, USA KRISTOPHER GILES, 1 GARY HEIN2 AND FRANK PEAIRS3 1Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA 2Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska Panhandle R&E Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska, USA 3Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA Introduction: Description of the Problem and Need for an Areawide Pest Management Approach In the Great Plains of the USA from Wyoming to Texas, dryland winter wheat either is regularly grown continuously or is followed by a year of fallow in semi-arid locales (Royer and Krenzer, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Weeds of the Appalachian Region
    $10 $10 PB1785 PB1785 Invasive Weeds Invasive Weeds of the of the Appalachian Appalachian Region Region i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………...i How to use this guide…………………………………ii IPM decision aid………………………………………..1 Invasive weeds Grasses …………………………………………..5 Broadleaves…………………………………….18 Vines………………………………………………35 Shrubs/trees……………………………………48 Parasitic plants………………………………..70 Herbicide chart………………………………………….72 Bibliography……………………………………………..73 Index………………………………………………………..76 AUTHORS Rebecca M. Koepke-Hill, Extension Assistant, The University of Tennessee Gregory R. Armel, Assistant Professor, Extension Specialist for Invasive Weeds, The University of Tennessee Robert J. Richardson, Assistant Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, North Caro- lina State University G. Neil Rhodes, Jr., Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, The University of Ten- nessee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank all the individuals and organizations who have contributed their time, advice, financial support, and photos to the crea- tion of this guide. We would like to specifically thank the USDA, CSREES, and The Southern Region IPM Center for their extensive support of this pro- ject. COVER PHOTO CREDITS ii 1. Wavyleaf basketgrass - Geoffery Mason 2. Bamboo - Shawn Askew 3. Giant hogweed - Antonio DiTommaso 4. Japanese barberry - Leslie Merhoff 5. Mimosa - Becky Koepke-Hill 6. Periwinkle - Dan Tenaglia 7. Porcelainberry - Randy Prostak 8. Cogongrass - James Miller 9. Kudzu - Shawn Askew Photo credit note: Numbers in parenthesis following photo captions refer to the num- bered photographer list on the back cover. HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE Tabs: Blank tabs can be found at the top of each page. These can be custom- ized with pen or marker to best suit your method of organization. Examples: Infestation present On bordering land No concern Uncontrolled Treatment initiated Controlled Large infestation Medium infestation Small infestation Control Methods: Each mechanical control method is represented by an icon.
    [Show full text]
  • Turfgrass Selection Ryegrasses
    Extension W159-F Turfgrass Selection Ryegrasses Tom Samples, Professor and John Sorochan, Associate Professor Plant Sciences Due to rapid seed germination and seedling growth, ryegrasses were once planted as nurse Varieties grasses in seed ‘Florida 80’ (1982, Florida AES), ‘Gulf’ (1958, mixtures with Texas AES and Plant Research Division ARS), slower-growing, ‘Jackson’ (1989, Mississippi AFES), ‘Marshall’ perennial cool- (1980, Mississippi AFES) and ‘TAM 90’ (1991, season species Texas AES) continue to be used to temporarily including the control soil erosion in the South. ‘Axcella,’ fescues and evaluated as ABT-99-3-268 and recently (2001) Kentucky released by the Texas AES, Overton, Texas, is the bluegrass. first turf-type variety marketed for winter over- Unfortunately, seeding of bermudagrass turfs. This variety is an ryegrasses early-maturing, dwarf-type and is darker than can be very other annual ryegrasses. Axcella has finer leaves, aggressive in greater stand density and a slower vertical growth mixed stands, and may dominate a preferred rate than many other annual ryegrasses. Seeds turfgrass species by competing for nutrients, of Axcella annual ryegrass are about 25 percent sunlight, water and space. Intermediate (Lolium larger than perennial ryegrass seeds. When over- hybridum) and perennial (Lolium perenne L.) seeded alone or with varieties of intermediate ryegrasses are sometimes used to over-seed and perennial ryegrasses, Axcella matures quickly dormant bermudagrass. Annual ryegrass (Lolium and transitions from the stand as bermudagrass multiflorum Lam.) is widely used to provide resumes growth in spring. temporary ground cover and soil erosion control until a perennial turf can be planted. Intermediate Ryegrass Annual Ryegrass Intermediate or transitional ryegrass is a hybrid Annual ryegrass, also known as Italian ryegrass, of annual and perennial ryegrass.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Parasitism by Aphelinus Certus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a Parasitoid of Aphis Glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Author(S): Andrew J
    Development and Parasitism by Aphelinus certus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a Parasitoid of Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Author(s): Andrew J. Frewin, Yingen Xue, John A. Welsman, A. Bruce Broadbent, Arthur W. Schaafsma, and Rebecca H. Hallett Source: Environmental Entomology, 39(5):1570-1578. 2010. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: 10.1603/EN09312 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/EN09312 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is an electronic aggregator of bioscience research content, and the online home to over 160 journals and books published by not-for-profit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. BEHAVIOR Development and Parasitism by Aphelinus certus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a Parasitoid of Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) ANDREW J. FREWIN,1 YINGEN XUE,1 JOHN A. WELSMAN,2 A. BRUCE BROADBENT,3 2 1,4 ARTHUR W. SCHAAFSMA, AND REBECCA H. HALLETT Environ. Entomol. 39(5): 1570Ð1578 (2010); DOI: 10.1603/EN09312 ABSTRACT Since its introduction in 2000, the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura) has been a serious pest of soybean in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Hippodamia Variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Detected in Michigan Soybean Fields
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ValpoScholar The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 38 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2005 Numbers 3 & Article 8 4 - Fall/Winter 2005 October 2005 Hippodamia Variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Detected in Michigan Soybean Fields Mary M. Gardiner Michigan State University Gary L. Parsons Michigan State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gardiner, Mary M. and Parsons, Gary L. 2005. "Hippodamia Variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Detected in Michigan Soybean Fields," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 38 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol38/iss2/8 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Gardiner and Parsons: <i>Hippodamia Variegata</i> (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) D 164 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 38, Nos. 3 & 4 HIPPODAMIA VARIEGATA (GOEZE) (COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE) DETECTED IN MICHIGAN SOYBEAN FIELDS Mary M. Gardiner1 and Gary L. Parsons2 ABSTRACT Since its initial detection near Montreal, Canada in 1984, the variegated lady beetle Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera:Coccinellidae) has spread throughout the northeastern United States. In 2005, this immigrant Old World species was detected in Michigan for the first time. Twenty-nine adults were found in soybean fields in 4 counties: Ingham, Gratiot, Kalamazoo, and Saginaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon City Nuisance Plant List
    Nuisance Plant List City of Oregon City 320 Warner Milne Road , P.O. Box 3040, Oregon City, OR 97045 Phone: (503) 657-0891, Fax: (503) 657-7892 Scientific Name Common Name Acer platanoides Norway Maple Acroptilon repens Russian knapweed Aegopodium podagraria and variegated varieties Goutweed Agropyron repens Quack grass Ailanthus altissima Tree-of-heaven Alliaria officinalis Garlic Mustard Alopecuris pratensis Meadow foxtail Anthoxanthum odoratum Sweet vernalgrass Arctium minus Common burdock Arrhenatherum elatius Tall oatgrass Bambusa sp. Bamboo Betula pendula lacinata Cutleaf birch Brachypodium sylvaticum False brome Bromus diandrus Ripgut Bromus hordeaceus Soft brome Bromus inermis Smooth brome-grasses Bromus japonicus Japanese brome-grass Bromus sterilis Poverty grass Bromus tectorum Cheatgrass Buddleia davidii (except cultivars and varieties) Butterfly bush Callitriche stagnalis Pond water starwort Cardaria draba Hoary cress Carduus acanthoides Plumeless thistle Carduus nutans Musk thistle Carduus pycnocephalus Italian thistle Carduus tenufolius Slender flowered thistle Centaurea biebersteinii Spotted knapweed Centaurea diffusa Diffuse knapweed Centaurea jacea Brown knapweed Centaurea pratensis Meadow knapweed Chelidonium majou Lesser Celandine Chicorum intybus Chicory Chondrilla juncea Rush skeletonweed Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle Cirsium vulgare Common Thistle Clematis ligusticifolia Western Clematis Clematis vitalba Traveler’s Joy Conium maculatum Poison-hemlock Convolvulus arvensis Field Morning-glory 1 Nuisance Plant List
    [Show full text]
  • RYEGRASSES the 17Th in a Series by R.W
    UNDERSTANDING TURF MANAGEMENT RYEGRASSES the 17th in a series by R.W. Sheard, P. Ag. yegrass originally developed as a grass is more difficult to mow than other are formed. The stems will resist mowing Rpasture grass which would withstand turfgrass species. A whitish appearance, by reel mowers giving the sports field a close grazing and had a superior ability to due to shredded, mutilated leaves, may be ragged appearance. produce meat and milk. Even today nitro- observed if the mower becomes dull. A second disadvantage is the lack of cold gen-fertilized ryegrass is the preferred A second advantage of ryegrass is the tolerance. More recent cultivar introduc- animal feed for cattle in the Netherlands. relatively rapid germination and emer- tions of turf type perennial ryegrass, how- The early settlers in New Zealand fell and gence rate. Under favourable temperature ever, have increase cold tolerance. Unless burnt the forests, then threw Ryegrass seed conditions of 12 - 25°C, ryegrass will good snow cover can be assure in areas in the ashes to develop one of great intro- emerge in 5 to 8 days. Thus ryegrass is the with severe winters winter kill can be a duced grazing environments in the world. preferred species for oversee ding in the serious problem. late spring or early fall. In oversee ding Ryegrass is susceptible to leaf rusts. In The Ryegrass Family operations rapid germination of the rye- August and early September rust can re- grass increases its competition potential duce the vigour and quality of pure rye- There are about ten species of ryegrass with weed species, such as annual blue- grass stands growing at low levels of which have been botanically identified, grass, which may also be germinating.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Grass Notes Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium Perenne)
    Forage Grass Notes Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) Introduction Perennial ryegrass is a cool season bunch grass High quality perennial, the choice for pasture where adapted – best adjusted to wet mild temperate climates (New Zealand and Great Britain) Perennial ryegrass can withstand considerable grazing management and remain productive Growth and Morphology Root system is very fibrous, leaves are prominently ribbed on the upper side and shiny on the bottom Leaves are folded in the bud as compared to the fescues which are rolled in the bud Leaf sheaths are red to purple at the base Optimum growth occurs at temperatures 20°- 25°C Grows best on fertile, well-drained soils - does best on soil with pH 6 -7 Much less persistent than orchardgrass, meadow fescue, timothy or bromegrass - susceptible to winter kill and crown r ust- major reasons why its not more highly utilized in Eastern Canada Importance and Use Considered a premier quality grazing species Perennial ryegrass has greater dry matter digestibility than other temperate perennial grass species Produces good dairy pasture, though excellent for all classes of livestock Graze between 20-25 cm tall down to 5 cm stubble - Yield and persistence better under rotational grazing Perennial ryegrass can also be harvested as silage or hay Rapid germination and quick establishment make it a preferred species for sod seeding where adapted Culture and Management Recommended seeding rat es are 7 kg/ha in mixture with 8 kg/ha meadow fescue, 3 kg/ha white clover and 5 kg/ha timothy for pasture Seed in early spring for best results Persistence is best under rotational grazing rather than continuous grazing Apply P&K based on soil test - Nitrogen should be applied in split applications at rates relative to legume content.
    [Show full text]
  • Cereal Aphids G
    G1284 (Revised August 2005) Cereal Aphids G. L. Hein, Extension Entomologist, J. A. Kalisch, Extension Technologist, and J. Thomas, Research Coordinator to living young. A female may produce two to three young Identification and general discussion of the cereal per day under warm conditions, and females may mature in aphid species most commonly found in Nebraska small 7-10 days. This tremendous reproduction potential can result grains, corn, sorghum and millet. in rapid aphid population buildup. Males of some species are seldom if ever seen. Cereal aphids can be a serious threat to several Nebraska Both winged and wingless aphids may be present in the crops. Aphid feeding may cause direct damage to the plant or field. Winged forms are produced when the quality of the host result in transmission of plant diseases. Aphids also may cause plant declines, such as at maturity. Other factors, including damage by injecting toxic salivary secretions during feeding. temperature, photoperiod or seasonality, and population density In Nebraska the most serious cereal aphid problems result also may be involved. The ability of aphids to use flight for from Russian wheat aphid infestations on wheat and barley dispersal is an important factor that contributes to the status and greenbug infestations on sorghum and to a lesser extent of these insects as pests. on wheat. Growers must monitor their crops for these aphids. Greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) Several other cereal aphid species also may be present, but they seldom cause significant damage. Accurate aphid identi- The greenbug is a light green aphid with a dark green fication is necessary to make the best management decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Variation of Flowering Time and Vernalization Responsiveness in Brachypodium Distachyon
    Bioenerg. Res. (2010) 3:38–46 DOI 10.1007/s12155-009-9069-3 Natural Variation of Flowering Time and Vernalization Responsiveness in Brachypodium distachyon Christopher J. Schwartz & Mark R. Doyle & Antonio J. Manzaneda & Pedro J. Rey & Thomas Mitchell-Olds & Richard M. Amasino Published online: 7 February 2010 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010 Abstract Dedicated bioenergy crops require certain char- Keywords Biomass . Bioenergy. Brachypodium . acteristics to be economically viable and environmentally Flowering time . Vernalization sustainable. Perennial grasses, which can provide large amounts of biomass over multiple years, are one option being investigated to grow on marginal agricultural land. Introduction Recently, a grass species (Brachypodium distachyon) has been developed as a model to better understand grass Biomass yield is an important component to consider in any physiology and ecology. Here, we report on the flowering program designed to derive energy from plant material. time variability of natural Brachypodium accessions in Plant size and architecture are important biomass yield response to temperature and light cues. Changes in both parameters, and these parameters are often quite variable environmental parameters greatly influence when a given within a given species. Intraspecies variation in biomass accession will flower, and natural Brachypodium accessions yield can be a product of many factors. One such factor is broadly group into winter and spring annuals. Similar to the timing of the transition from vegetative to reproductive what has been discovered in wheat and barley, we find that growth. The switch to flowering causes a diversion of a portion of the phenotypic variation is associated with resources from the continual production of photosynthetic changes in expression of orthologs of VRN genes, and thus, material (leaves) to the terminal production of reproductive VRN genes are a possible target for modifying flowering tissue (flowers, seeds, and fruit).
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Multispectral Remote Sensing for Russian Wheat Aphid
    AIRBORNE MULTI-SPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING FOR RUSSIAN WHEAT APHID INFESTATIONS Norm Elliott1, Mustafa Mirik2, Zhiming Yang3, Tom Dvorak4, Mahesh Rao3, Jerry Michels2, Vasile Catana2, Mpho Phoofolo2, Kris Giles2, and Tom Royer2 1USDA-ARS-PSRL 1301 N. Western Rd., Stillwater, OK 74074 [email protected] 2Texas Agricultural Experiment Station 2301 Experiment Station Rd., Bushland, TX 79012 [email protected], [email protected] 3Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078 [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] 4University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52243 [email protected] ABSTRACT The Russian wheat aphid (RWA) is a severe pest of wheat in the High Plains region of the United States. Remote sensing could be effective for detecting RWA infestations for pest management decision-making. We evaluated an airborne multi-spectral remote sensing system for its ability to differentiate varying levels of injury caused by RWA infestation in winter wheat fields. Two study fields were located in southeastern Colorado in spring 2004, and two fields were located in far western Oklahoma in spring 2005. In each field, RWA density and plant damage were determined for 20-24 3x3 m plots with varying levels of RWA damage. Prior to sampling plots, multi-spectral imagery was obtained using an SSTCRIS® multi-spectral imaging system mounted NADIR in a Cessna 172 aircraft. The multi-spectral data were used to compare with RWA infestation level for each plot. Correlations between vegetation indices and the proportion of RWA damaged wheat tillers per plot were negative for all vegetation indices calculated.
    [Show full text]