DOCSLIB.ORG

Evidence Report (Version 24)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evidence Report (Version 24) Towards a Liverpool City Region European Sites Recreation Mitigation & Avoidance Strategy –Evidence Report (Version 24) July 2021 The evidence base contained within this draft report will be periodically updated when new data and evidence is available. It has been prepared by Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service and draws on the unpublished and draft work of Footprint Ecology, Holbury Consultancy Services and Verdant Streets, for the Recreation Mitigation Strategy Steering Group. The project has been overseen by a Steering Group comprising local officers of Halton Borough Council, Liverpool City Council, Metropolitan Borough of Knowsley, Metropolitan Borough of St. Helens, Metropolitan Borough of Sefton and Wirral Borough Council, Natural England and National Trust. 1 Issue and Revision Record Version Date Author Approved by Description v23 12th Dr Alan February Jemmett 2021 v24 21st June Daniel Dr Alan Jemmett Steering Group 2021 Finegan comments, including revision of housing numbers and SANG sites 2 Itemised Document Changes Section/Paragraph Requested by who Matter Actioned Outcome (Y/N) Front Cover to A.B., Natural England Y Version control record Acknowledgements: pgs. and detailed document 3-4 change tables introduced Various throughout A.B., Natural England Y Alteration of ‘cumulative’ Evidence Report to ‘in-combination’ terminology Section 3: 3.4- A.B., Natural England Y Amended text Conservation Packages Section 4: 4.1- A.B., Natural England Y Amended text Coastal access at Hale & Oglet Section 4: 4.10 & 4.11- A.B., Natural England Y Text amended to include English Coastal Path hyperlink and updated information Section 4: 4.15- M.E., Liverpool City Y Text amended to Removal of Festival Council promote LCC Gardens as SANG option greenspaces, inc. Sefton Park Section 7: Table 4 I.L., Sefton Council Y Table 4, column heading and remaining unconsented housing number amended Section 7: Table 5 I.L., Sefton Council Y Table 5, remaining requirement for new dwellings within inner zone total amended Section 7: 7.51- A.B., Natural England Y Para 7.51 added for Inner and Outer zones explanation of inner and outer zones Section 7: 7.20, 7.31, 7.32 J.E., Wirral Council Y Amended Text (and assoc. Plan-level HRA text box) Section 8: Table 8, 8.29 I.L., Sefton Council Y Sefton & Liverpool SANG 8.32 M.E., Liverpool City lists updated SANG list (inc. removal of Council Festival Gardens) Section 9: text box A.B., Natural England Y Viability text box preceding 9.5- amended Viability and HRA Appendix 6: 6.16, 6.17, I.L., Sefton Council Y 6.16 & 6.22 deleted. 6.17, 6.19, 6.20, 6.22 6.18, 6.19, 6.20 text amended and updated Section 3: Paragraph 3.2 N.M., West Lancashire Y Text amended to include Council West Lancashire (other insertions to follow once details finalised) Section 7: Table 5 A.J., MEAS Y Disclaimer re. Knowsley housing figures and SANGs. 3 Executive Summary Why has this study been prepared? The coastal sites in the Liverpool City Region, which are internationally important for nature conservation, are under increasing pressure from recreation. There is evidence that the sites are already being damaged, and the condition of different areas are deteriorating. This is acknowledged in the formal conservation advice for these European Sites (Conservation Advice Packages and Site Improvement Plans) and the Habitats Regulations Assessments of the Local Plans for each of the 6 Local Authorities. All the Local Plans across the LCR include housing targets and policies for housing and tourism which have the potential to increase the recreation pressure on the European Sites. This raises the prospect of further damage and significant effects on the nature conservation features of the European sites including site integrity. The Local Authorities have a legal responsibility under the Habitats Regulations to demonstrate that their housing growth aspirations and changes in the patterns of development and pressure on the coast, will not have an adverse effect on the European Sites. The statutory nature conservation advisor, Natural England, has made it clear that it expects the Local Authorities to collaborate and deliver an effective strategic solution to issues across the Liverpool City Region. Recent Examination Hearings for Local Plans have also scrutinised the local and LCR response to recreation pressure. A clear commitment and timetable to complete and implement a strategic solution (termed Recreation Mitigation Strategy or RMS) is therefore required. If the Local Authorities are unable to demonstrate no adverse effects on integrity of the European Sites, then planning consent cannot be legally given for such development or alternatively, the Local Authorities would need to fund the avoidance and mitigation measures themselves. Clearly, neither of these options are likely in the current and foreseeable financial position of Local Government. This Project has therefore been commissioned by the Local Authorities and National Trust in close consultation with Natural England as the initial step in preparing a strategic response to protect the coast and comply with the requirements of the Habitats Regulations. This draft Evidence Report is an important milestone for the Project as it moves all the Liverpool City Region Local Authorities forwards to agreeing and completing the strategic response – the RMS. This Evidence Report describes the status of knowledge on recreation pressure in the Liverpool City Region and collates available evidence on this issue. Currently, planning applications for housing and/or tourism development are considered on a case by case basis with little strategic response which is inefficient and time-consuming. Not having 4 a consistent, strategic approach to the issue is a risk for progress of Local Plans also. It is the intention that this draft Evidence Report will be developed, once key data gaps have been filled. The intended output will be the RMS as a strategic response across the Liverpool City Region that will be used, in due course, to inform for example Local Plan and other policy, planning decisions, site management and investment in coastal visitor infrastructure. The draft Evidence Report sets out a clear timetable for this in Section 11. The evidence base contained within this draft report will be periodically updated when new data and evidence is available. It has been prepared by Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service and draws on the unpublished and draft work of Footprint Ecology, Holbury Consultancy Services and Verdant Streets, for the Steering Group. Introduction When the Steering Group appointed the consultancy team, headed by Footprint Ecology, to prepare the RMS it is was thought that the process would take 12 to 18 months to complete. The Steering Group and consultants worked on an iterative draft basis with iterative drafts being completed (28-3-18, 6-7-18 and 15-10-19). The Steering Group agreed a risk-based response that the project be paused until such time as the evidence base gaps were addressed sufficiently to meet planning tests. It was also agreed that the draft Evidence Report and a proposed integrated set of interim measures as a separate report be prepared and published to bridge the gap. The focus is housing. Tourism development has been removed from the scope of the Project for the time being. Work to prepare the draft Evidence Report fell to MEAS as project managers for the study. It was also agreed that the existing consultancy team should be retained until such time as new evidence was collected for completion of the RMS. The study timetable has been revised further following the Covid-19 outbreak because social distancing measures meant that face to face site surveys were not possible and the data collected was likely to be heavily skewed to the local community given travel restrictions. This is explained in greater detail in Section 10. Whilst this timescale appears lengthy at first glance, experience elsewhere across England has shown that is often takes 5 – 10 years to complete a strategy such as that envisaged for the RMS including putting in place the implementation and monitoring measures and systems. This draft Evidence Report has collated the current evidence-base for a proposed strategic response by the 6 Local Authorities in the Liverpool City Region to meet their legal requirements to protect European wildlife sites from the implications of growth. It should be used to underpin Local Plan and development management responses in the interim to facilitate sustainable housing development, whilst securing sustainable, long term protection of the internationally important wildlife from recreation impacts. 5 All the Local Planning Authorities have a clear intention to develop the RMS to provide a tested, evidence based and strategic solution to meet their legal duties under the Habitats Regulations, resolving issues from the growing recreation pressure on the internationally important coast of the Liverpool City Region. The solutions proposed will not be compulsory but will provide planning services and developers with a potential solution which they may choose to use (opt-in). This is likely to be more efficient, reducing time, costs and risks during the planning process compared to completing site-based impact assessments, consulting and agreeing mitigation packages on a bespoke basis. The emerging RMS also presents an opportunity to provide coastal site owners and managers with evidence and mechanisms to develop their own site-specific and coastal gateway-specific recreation management and visitor infrastructure plans. The RMS will adopt a strategic coast-wide approach. It is the intention to focus interventions towards areas of greatest vulnerability including key gateway and coastal access locations where recreation pressure is greatest (duration, frequency and number of visits). The European sites (the network of these sites is now called National Sites Network following withdrawal from the E.U.) are subject to strict legal protection which conveys specific duties and stringent tests to be met before Local Plans can be adopted and projects can be permitted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of Speed in Ormond Beach
    The History of Speed in Ormond Beach ORMOND BEACH, Fla. - In 1903, the smooth, hard-packed sands of Ormond Beach became a proving ground for automobile inventors and drivers. These first speed tournaments in the US earned Ormond the title “Birthplace of Speed.” Records set here during speed trial tournaments for much of the next eight years would be the first significant marks recorded outside of Europe. Motorcycle and automobile owners and racers brought vehicles that used gasoline, steam and electric engines. They came from France, Germany, and England as well as from across the United States. The Ormond Garage, the first gasoline alley before Indianapolis Speedway, was built in 1905 by Henry Flagler, owner of the Ormond Hotel, to accommodate participating race cars during the beach races. The Ormond Garage would house the drivers and mechanics during the speed time trials. Owners and manufacturers stayed, of course, at Flagler’s Ormond Hotel. Pictured: The Ormond Garage in 1905, with Louis Ross in his steam-powered "Wogglebug" No. 4 and other racers. Tragically, the Ormond Garage caught fire and burned to the ground in 1976, destroying one of auto history’s most important landmarks as well as antique cars owned by local residents who used the Garage as a museum. Sadly, all that remains is a historic marker, in front of SunTrust Bank, built on its ashes on East Granada Boulevard. Racing on Ormond Beach started in 1902. But the city’s famous connection with racing began in 1903 when the Winton Bullet won a Challenge Cup against the Olds Pirate by two-tenths of a second.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-01-26 Houston Installation Contact Wire1
    Installation of Contact Wire (CW) for High Speed Lines - Recommendations Dr.-Ing. Frank Pupke Product Development Metal and Railways IEEE meeting - Houston, 25.01.2010 Frank Pupke 2010-01-25 Content 1. Material properties 2. Tension 3. Levelling Device 4. Examples for installation with levelling device 5. Quality check 6. Different Contact Wires in Europe 7. Recommendations Frank Pupke 2010-01-25 Examples – High speed Cologne- Frankfurt Spain Frank Pupke 2010-01-25 World Record Railway 574,8 km/h with nkt cables products The high-speed train TGV V150 reached with a speed of 574,8 km/h the world land speed record for conventional railed trains on 3 April 2007. The train was built in France and tested between Strasbourg and Paris The trials were conducted jointly by SNCF, Alstom and Réseau Ferré de France The catenary wire was made of bronze, with a circular cross-section of 116 mm2 and delivered by nkt cables. Catenary voltage was increased from 25 kV to 31 kV for the record attempt. The mechanical tension in the wire was increased to 40 kN from the standard 25 kN. The contact wire was made of copper tin by nkt cables and has a cross-section of 150 mm2. The track super elevation was increased to support higher speeds. The speed of the transverse wave induced in the overhead wire by the train's pantograph was thus increased to 610 km/h, providing a margin of safety beyond the train's maximum speed. Frank Pupke 2010-01-25 1. Material Properties - 1 Contact wire drawing: Frank Pupke 2010-01-25 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS)
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Designation date Site Reference Number Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY UK Telephone/Fax: +44 (0)1733 – 562 626 / +44 (0)1733 – 555 948 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: Designated: 16 February 1995 3. Country: UK (England) 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Ribble and Alt Estuaries 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Wirral Landscape Character Assessment 2019 B
    Chapter 3 Formative Influences Wirral Landscape Character Assessment October 2019 Summary of Landscape Issues LUC I 32 -Chapter 4 Summary of Landscape Issues Wirral Landscape Character Assessment October 2019 Chapter 4 Summary of Landscape Issues Wirral’s landscape is constantly changing through Approximately 11% of Wirral’s land area is currently at human activity and natural processes. The cumulative effects risk from flooding from the sea and/or from watercourses, of these processes can considerably alter the character of the including river valleys associated with the Fender, Birket, landscape. Arrowe Brook and Dibbin. Measures to provide river and coastal flood protection may lead to conflict between defences The descriptions of individual landscape character areas and wildlife value, particularly along coastlines as sea level include reference to key pressures derived from discussions rises threaten coastal towns and villages. with Council Officers and a review of relevant information relating to land use, agricultural trends and development pressures and previous public consultation10. The main Coastal processes pressures that have potential to influence the landscape Wirral’s coast has a major influence on the character of character of Wirral as a whole are set out below. the Borough and is a major asset for tourism. Whilst most of the Mersey coast is heavily developed, the natural character Climate change of Wirral’s undeveloped northern and western coastline is of considerable importance for recreation and nature Climate change is a major pressure on rural landscapes conservation. The inter-tidal foreshores and their supporting and is likely to result in increasingly unpredictable weather habitats are of national and international importance and form with hotter drier summers, more intense rainfall and longer dry one of the most significant wetland habitats for birds in periods resulting in the need for agriculture to adapt to grow western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Wirral Borough Council Draft Open Space Standards Paper January 2020
    WIRRAL BOROUGH COUNCIL DRAFT OPEN SPACE STANDARDS PAPER JANUARY 2020 QUALITY, INTEGRITY, PROFESSIONALISM Knight, Kavanagh & Page Ltd Company No: 9145032 (England) MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Registered Office: 1 -2 Frecheville Court, off Knowsley Street, Bury BL9 0UF T: 0161 764 7040 E: [email protected] www.kkp.co.uk WIRRAL BOROUGH COUNCIL DRAFT OPEN SPACE STANDARDS PAPER CONTENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 PART 2: ASSESSMENT REPORT SUMMARY ............................................................... 4 PART 3: SETTING PROVISION STANDARDS................................................................ 6 3.1 Developing and setting standards ........................................................................... 6 3.2 Quality ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Accessibility ............................................................................................................. 7 3.4 Quantity ................................................................................................................. 10 PART 4: APPLICATION OF PROVISION STANDARDS ............................................... 12 4.1: Quality and value.................................................................................................. 12 4.2: Accessibility .......................................................................................................... 13 4.3: Quantity
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Express
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN EXPRESS TEACHER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 A POSTCARD TO THE EDUCATOR 4 CHAPTER 1 ALL ABOARD! THE FILM 5 CHAPTER 2 THE NORTH AMERICAN DREAM REFLECTIONS ON THE RIBBON OF STEEL (CANADA AND U.S.A.) X CHAPTER 3 A RAILWAY JOURNEY EVOLUTION OF RAIL TRANSPORT X CHAPTER 4 THE LITTLE ENGINE THAT COULD THE MECHANICS OF THE RAILWAY AND TRAIN X CHAPTER 5 TALES, TRAGEDIES, AND TRIUMPHS THE RAILWAY AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES X CHAPTER 6 DO THE CHOO-CHOO A TRAIL OF INFLUENCE AND INSPIRATION X CHAPTER 7 ALONG THE RAILROAD TRACKS ACTIVITIES FOR THE TRAIN-MINDED 2 A POSTCARD TO THE EDUCATOR 1. Dear Educator, Welcome to our Teacher’s Guide, which has been prepared to help educators integrate the IMAX® motion picture ROCKY MOUNTAIN EXPRESS into school curriculums. We designed the guide in a manner that is accessible and flexible to any school educator. Feel free to work through the material in a linear fashion or in any order you find appropriate. Or concentrate on a particular chapter or activity based on your needs as a teacher. At the end of the guide, we have included activities that embrace a wide range of topics that can be developed and adapted to different class settings. The material, which is targeted at upper elementary grades, provides students the opportunity to explore, to think, to express, to interact, to appreciate, and to create. Happy discovery and bon voyage! Yours faithfully, Pietro L. Serapiglia Producer, Rocky Mountain Express 2. Moraine Lake and the Valley of the Ten Peaks, Banff National Park, Alberta 3 The Film The giant screen motion picture Rocky Mountain Express, shot with authentic 15/70 negative which guarantees astounding image fidelity, is produced and distributed by the Stephen Low Company for exhibition in IMAX® theaters and other giant screen theaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Lancashire Core Strategy
    Local Development Framework Central Lancashire Core Strategy Revised Habitat Regulations Screening Assessment Report November 2011 This page is intentionally left blank Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION Page Number Background 1 Habitat Regulations Assessment Process 1 Natura 2000 Sites 2 Report Structure 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF PLAN North West Regional Spatial Strategy 3 Central Lancashire Core Strategy 3 Strategic Objectives 3 - 4 Core Strategy Policies/ Summaries 3 - 13 3. IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SITES Introduction 14 Methodology 14 - 15 Identification of Natura 2000 Sites 14 - 17 4. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS/ PATHWAYS Direct Development 18 Air Quality 18 Water Quality 18 Hydrology 18 Water Supply 18 Habitat Species/ Disturbance 18 Recreational/ Visitor Pressure 18 Pathways 19 5. ASSESSMENT OF LIKELY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS Core Strategy Policies Matrix's 20 - 23 Assessment with Other Plans 24 6. CONCLUSIONS Page Number Conclusions 25 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Description of Natura 2000 Sites 26 - 31 Appendix 2 Core Strategy Policies Initial Assessment Screening Matrix 32 - 50 Appendix 2a Core Strategy Policies Initial Assessment Screening Matrix 51 - 52 (changes post Examination in Public June/ July 2011) Appendix 3 Core Strategy Policies Potential Impacts 53 - 65 Avoidance/ Mitigation Matrix Appendix 3a Core Strategy Policies Potential Impacts Avoidance/ 66 - 70 Mitigation Matrix (changes post Examination in Public June/ July 2011) Appendix 4 'Other Plans' 71 - 78 1. INTRODUCTION Background 1.1 The Central Lancashire Core Strategy is a Development Plan Document (DPD) which will set out the vision, strategic objectives, general principles and the strategy for development and protection of land within Central Lancashire, until 2026. The Core Strategy forms part of the statutory development plan for Central Lancashire which includes the Districts of Chorley, South Ribble and Preston and once adopted will become the main DPD within the wider suite of planning policy documents; the Local Development Framework (LDF).
    [Show full text]
  • 1757.007B Thurstaston and Arrowe Country Park Wooded Hills.Cdr
    Thurstaston and Arrowe Park Wooded Hills Sandstone Ridgeline Key Characteristics Series of wooded hills From high ground the character area appears almost totally wooded Undulating farmland often shows long and linear patterns bordered by mature hedgerows and trees and small belts of woodland Prominent sandstone ridgeline with heathland and establishing woodland on its slopes Expansive views across Wirral towards Liverpool, Frodsham and North Wales possible from high ground Formal parkland at Arrowe Country Park and Royden Park Frequent areas of informal open space Rising roofline of housing appears nestled within woodland Small villages within character area with larger urban areas beyond generally well screened along the character area boundary Arrowe Park Hospital visible above woodland vegetation on high ground Landscape Character This area is within the northern part of the Wirral and Larger open spaces include parkland at Arrowe Country includes land between Caldy, Heswall, Greasby and Park and Royden Park and informal recreational land, extending to the north of Frankby. managed for its heathland and nature conservation value, at Thurstaston Common. Arrowe Park Golf The area includes some of the highest land in the Course is to the south of Arrowe Country Park and there borough and forms a series of small hills and a is a small cemetery to the south west of Frankby. prominent sandstone ridgeline. High points are 91m AOD at Thurstaston Common, 77m AOD at Caldy and A series of small wooded brooks and streams flow 55m AOD south of Greasby and lower-lying land at 25m through the northern part of the character area and to adjacent to Greasby Brook.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Didn't the Supersonic Car Fly?
    Why Didn't The Supersonic KENNETH MORCAN C.Math.FIMA, OUBAY HASSAN AND NICEL WEATHERILL C.Math.FIMA University of Wales Swansea The supersonic car, ThrustSSC, took the World Land Table 1. The World Land Speed Record: major milestones achieved before 1997 Speed Record beyond the speed of sound on the Black Year Driver Nationality Speed Attained (mph) Rock Desert in Nevada in October 1997. To achieve this 1898 Gaston de Ch-Laubat France 39 feat, many challenging technological problems had to be 1904 Louis Rigolly France 103 addressed. One such problem was the aerodynamic de- 1927 Henry Segrave UK 203 sign of the vehicle to ensure that it could be safely oper- 1935 Malcolm Campbell UK 301 1964 Donald Campbell U K 403 ated and, in particular, that it remained in contact with 1964 Craig Breedlove USA 526 the ground at all speeds. Here we outline the role that 1965 Craig Breedlove USA 600 was played by computational fluid dynamics in assisting 1983 Richard Noble U K 633 the process of aerodynamic design. get was 700 mph, but as this was not too far distant from the speed of sound at ground level, which is around 760 mph, he INTRODUCTION decided that he would assemble a team to attempt to take the he first World Land Speed Record was set by Count Record to supersonic speed, ie faster than the speed of sound. Gaston de Chasseloup-Laubat in Acheres, France on Experience had shown, and we'll touch upon this again shortly, TDecember 12 1898. Driving an electric vehicle, he set the that this was not just going to be a matter of making minor mod- Record at 39 mph.
    [Show full text]
  • 57. Sefton Coast Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 57. Sefton Coast Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 57. Sefton Coast Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Supporting Habitat Liverpool Docks Aug 2015
    Assessment of Supporting Habitat (Docks) for Use by Qualifying Features of Natura 2000 Sites in the Liverpool City Region Ornithology Report Report Ref: 4157.005 August 2015 Assessment of Supporting Habitat (Docks) for Use by Qualifying Features of Natura 2000 Sites in the Liverpool City Region Ornithology Report Document Reference: 4157.005 Version 3.0 August 2015 Prepared by: TEP Genesis Centre Birchwood Science Park Warrington WA3 7BH Tel: 01925 844004 Fax: 01925 844002 e-mail: [email protected] for: Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service First floor Merton House Stanley Road Bootle Merseyside L20 3DL Written: Checked: Approved: MW TR TR CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SURVEY METHODS .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SUMMARY SURVEY FINDINGS ............................................................................ 17 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 82 6.0 DISCUSSION OF IMPLICATIONS RELATING TO NATURA 2000 SITES.............. 83 7.0 REFERENCES & FURTHER READING ................................................................. 86 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Examples of Survey Sheets Appendix 2: Vantage Point Survey Coverage Appendix 3: Tabulated Raw Data Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]